Reforms of the Armenian army stall

Vestnik Kavkaza
Dec 6 2021
 6 Dec in 19:30  Factor TV

Although a year has passed since the Prime Minister of Armenia, Nikolai Pashinyan, stated that the country’s armed forces should be modernized, non-governmental organizations working in the defence sector see no progress in this matter. It is mentioned in the report of the Armenian Internet channel Factor TV.

On November 18, 2020, the Prime Minister spoke for the first time about the post-war reform of the army, when a road map for the transformation of the Armed Forces of Armenia was presented. Three months later, at the end of February 2021, Pashinyan announced the creation of a working group on army reform. Although a separate concept for the country’s military reform was never published, government officials have noted some of the proposed changes in their interviews.

Thus, the first factor of Armenia’s security was called “the modernized Armenian army”, then the “strategic alliance with Russia” and “membership in the CSTO” were noted. The Government’s five-year programme reflected many of the priorities of army construction. In particular, the reduction of the period of military service for conscripts, an active transition to a contract basis and stage-by-stage creation, the purchase of new weapons and military equipment, the development of military education, etc.

However, as reported by the Vanadzor office of the Helsinki Assembly, since then there is no information about what concrete steps have been taken towards the reforms of the Armenian army. Also, it was not possible to find out anything from the secretary of the Armenian Security Council Armen Grigoryan. In response to a request from civil society representatives, he responded with only general phrases that “the discussions are continuing”, and there is no additional information for the public yet. The head of the Vanadzor office of the Helsinki Assembly Artur Sakunts believes that such an answer from Grigoryan may indicate that no work was carried out in principle. Meanwhile, Andranik Kocharyan, who chairs the parliamentary committee on security and defense, believes that “personnel changes in the government” in the military sphere speak of “modernization of the armed forces”.

In this context, it should be noted that four Defence Ministers have been replaced in Armenia since the 2020 44-day war. Also, since 2018, the Chief of the General Staff of Armenia has been replaced three times, and Artak Davtyan appointed to this position twice. According to the Vanadzor Office of the Helsinki Assembly, 19 personnel changes have been made in the General Staff in the last two years, most of them in the post-war period. Six of these personnel changes affected the military who signed the resignation letter of Nikola Pashinyan. Artur Sakunts also considers it “problematic” that Russia is considered the only partner for the modernization of the Armenian army. 

In his turn, Andranik Kocharyan, who is considered one of Nikol Pashinyan’s closest associates, emphasizes that partnership with Russia does not exclude Armenia’s opportunities to purchase weapons from third countries, including NATO countries. “The general public still does not know when the armed forces will begin noticeable reforms. High-ranking officials are still silent on this topic,” the NGO notes.

Armenia "discussing" demarcation committee with Russia, Azerbaijan

PanArmenian, Armenia
Dec 6 2021

PanARMENIAN.Net – The Chairman of the parliament’s Standing Committee on Foreign Relations Eduard Aghajanyan has said that discussions on forming a delimitation and demarcation committee are currently underway, and that “there is nothing new about it”.

“This road is naturally not smooth. The most important thing is that this work is underway, which is the best proof that all the parties are really interested in resolving the issue and coming up with acceptable options,” Aghajanyan said on Monday, December 6, according to Pastinfo.

Secretary of the Security Council Armen grigoryan said earlier that the Armenian, Russian and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Ministers were unable to reach agreements at a recent meeting in Moscow. According to him, the reason behind this is that “Azerbaijan hasn’t been constructive”.

Sports: 10 Armenian lifters headed to World Championships in Tashkent

PanArmenian, Armenia
Dec 6 2021

PanARMENIAN.Net – 10 Armenian lifters will compete in the 2021 World Weightlifting Championships scheduled to be held from 7 to 17 December in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, the Weightlifting Federation of Armenia reports.

In particular, Tatev Hakobyan (81 kg weight category), Rafik Harutyunyan (81 kg), Andranik Karapetyan (89 kg), Hakob Mkrtchyan, Davit Hovhannisyan (96 kg), Samvel Gasparyan, Arsen Martirosyan (102 kg), Simon Martirosyan (109 kg), Varazdat Lalayan and Gor Minasyan (+109 kg) will represent Armena in the competition.

Several nations will not compete at the event due to travel restrictions to Uzbekistan as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Weightlifters competing at the event are exempt from the required quarantine when visiting Uzbekistan.

Armenpress: NK conflict should be resolved in the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group. Eduard Aghajanyan

NK conflict should be resolved in the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group. Eduard Aghajanyan

Save

Share

 20:28, 6 December, 2021

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 6, ARMENPRESS. The resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue should take place in the framework of the Co-chairmanship of the OSCE Minsk Group, ARMENPRESS reports Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee of the National Assembly of Armenia Eduard Aghajanyan told the journalists.

“Armenia will not step back from its position, in particular will be loyal to the resolution of the issue in the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs’ format. This circumstance must also be highlighted in our domestic political discourse, because it is a position, which is shared by almost all important subjects of the international community, in particular the Co-chair countries of the OSCE Minsk Group, OSCE Member States. This is an important factor” said Eduard Aghajanyan.

Referring to the border situation of both Armenia and Artsakh, killings of civilians by the armed forces of Azerbaijan, Eduard Aghajanyan mentioned that the Government of the Republic of Armenia uses all possible instruments to reach de-escalation and exclude such cases.

Armenpress: The road is not smooth and easy – Eduard Aghajanyan about the work of the trilateral group of Deputy Prime Ministers

The road is not smooth and easy – Eduard Aghajanyan about the work of the trilateral group of Deputy Prime Ministers

Save

Share

 20:42, 6 December, 2021

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 6, ARMENPRESS. The meetings of the trilateral working group co-chaired by the Deputy Prime Ministers of Armenia, Russia and Azerbaijan are of a regular nature, ARMENPRESS reports Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee of the National Assembly of Armenia Eduard Aghajanyan told the journalists.

“The co-chairing countries and their representatives are trying to find mutually acceptable solutions, and this path is not smooth and easy. The most important record at the moment is that this work is ongoing, which is the best proof that all parties are interested in resolving the issue and moving to mutually acceptable options”, Aghajanyan said.

Turkish press: Turkey makes final touches to minority election regulations

Armenian clergy attend a religious service at Meryem Ana (Virgin Mary) Church, in Istanbul, Turkey, April, 26, 2018. (AA Photo)

After consultations with the representatives of minorities, the Turkish government aims to resolve a dispute over board elections for minority foundations. The thorny issue is vital for minorities, from Armenians to Assyrians, whose places of worship and historical importance are run by these foundations.

Burhan Ersoy, head of the state-run Directorate of Foundations, told Anadolu Agency (AA) last week that a new regulation on elections is expected to be implemented in April. “We held discussions with representatives of non-Muslim community foundations and heard their demands, and eventually, a draft text was formed based upon these meetings,” he said. The previous regulation allowing elections was annulled in 2013, with the government promising a better, more comprehensive regulation. However, Ersoy said some minorities asked for the reinstatement of the old regulations while others asked for a new one. He added that the draft regulation would be presented to the government for approval.

Süleyman Can Ustabaşı from the Assyrian community, the representative for all minorities at the Assembly of Foundations, said the structure of foundations and their membership profiles changed over time. “We request the directorate and the government to exchange views with foundations one last time before the regulation is implemented. This is what most foundations ask for. We certainly want elections but the final draft of the regulation should be created after (communities) express their final opinions on the issue,” he said.

Foundations of non-Muslim minorities have a legal status under the Lausanne Peace Treaty of 1923, which granted them equality before laws and freedom to establish and run “religious and social institutions.”

Turkey boosted its outreach to minorities in the past two decades and mostly resolved the issue of properties seized by the state and other entities in the past to minority foundations. Some 1,084 properties were returned to those foundations between 2003 and 2018, while 20 places of worship were restored and handed over to the communities.

A 1936 charter has paved the way for foundations to acquire properties but a 1974 court ruling reversed the process, enabling the state to seize the properties minorities acquired after 1936. Properties were mostly returned to their original owners and in the absence of owners, they were taken by the treasury.

New regulations in the 2000s enacted in compliance with Turkey’s harmonization packages for European Union membership, helped the return of properties to foundations. Turkey is home to some 167 minority foundations. The Turkish Greek community referred to as “Rums” have the highest number of foundations at 77 while the Armenian community has 54 and the Jewish community has 19 foundations.

Turkish press: Turkey’s STM to exhibit naval platforms, UAVs at Expodefensa 2021

STM modernized the Turkish Naval Forces’ submarines. (Courtesy of STM)

Turkish defense firm STM will showcase its naval platforms and tactical mini-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems at Expodefensa 2021 being held in Colombia next week.

“Under the leadership of our parent institution, the Presidency of Defense Industries (SSB), we will be attending Expodefensa 2021 to share our experience in projects in which we are proud to have participated as a trusted solution partner of various world navies, including Pakistan and Ukraine,” STM said in a statement.

The firm said it will introduce its tactical mini-UAV product family – which includes Alpagu, Kargu and Togan – to South America, along with its MILGEM (National Ship) Ada-class corvette as well as the I-class frigate, which is Turkey’s first national frigate project.

Alpagu is a portable fixed-wing strike UAV while Kargu is a portable rotary-wing variant. Togan is a portable rotary-wing spotter UAV.

Kargu, which has been in the arsenal of the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK), achieved its first export success this year. While the deliveries of the exported drones continue, negotiations with different countries showing interest in the product are also ongoing. This particular UAV, which has managed to prove itself on different battlefields, performs its duties under human control with the principle of “Man-in-the-loop.”

Alpagu, on the other hand, stands out with its light structure, diving velocity, low radar cross-sectional area and speed as well as its ability to cause pinpoint damage to targets. Alpagu, which can be carried by a single soldier and fired from a launcher, has a low weight of 1.9 kilograms (4.2 pounds).

Having already completed test shots, Alpagu is expected to enter the Turkish army’s arsenal in the coming weeks.

The naval platforms designed by STM are also closely followed by South American countries. In addition to the Offshore Patrol Ship (OPV), which is designed to perform surface defense warfare, effective uninterrupted reconnaissance, surveillance and patrol missions in the open sea and on the coast, MILGEM class ships are also turning heads.

The company’s CF3500 frigate, which it has designed in the form of a MILGEM boat for the Colombian Navy, will also be on display at the fair.

“The systems that continue to be used successfully in the field by the Turkish Navy are brought overseas as quality, affordable and modern engineering solutions,” the company statement said.

Expodefensa 2021, one of the most important defense industry fairs in Latin America and the Caribbean, will be held in Colombia’s capital Bogota from Nov. 29 to Dec. 1.

STM carries out collaborations, technology transfer and business development activities in more than 20 countries from South America to the Far East. Within the scope of design, construction and modernization activities, STM produces unique and flexible engineering solutions for the surface and submarine platforms of the Turkish Navy, which is a NATO member and also one of the most active navies in the world.

STM also undertakes important tasks in the submarine modernization and construction projects of the Turkish Navy. The firm successfully carried out the modernization of two type 209-class submarines of which it was the main contractor and took part as the leading contractor in the modernization of four Preveze class submarines. STM also fulfills important duties within the scope of the New Type Submarine Project for air-independent propulsion-system, namely Reis Class submarines, which will be an important stage in the realization of Turkey’s National Submarine Project. Accordingly, Section 50, the head section containing submarine torpedo tubes, which only a limited number of countries in the world can manufacture, was produced for the first time in Turkey by STM, marking a historic success.

STM earlier this year started the construction of corvettes for the Ukrainian Navy within the scope of cooperation that includes technology transfer. The company has already built and delivered Sea Supply Ship, PNS MOAWIN, Turkey’s largest tonnage military shipbuilding project, designed for the Pakistan Navy, to Karachi. Continuing its activities as the main contractor in the modernization of Agosta 90B Khalid class submarines, which are also owned by Pakistan, STM has gained the trust of the Pakistan Navy with these successful projects.

Turkish press: 4 Turkish firms display defense products at Colombia’s Expodefensa

Visitors try out guns and weapons during the Defense and Security Industry Fair “Expodefensa,” in Bogota, Colombia, Nov. 30, 2021. (EPA Photo)

Turkish defense giants STM, Aselsan, Machinery and Chemical Industry (MKE) and Otokar are showcasing their latest products at the Expodefensa 2021, one of the largest defense industry fairs in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The three-day exhibition in Bogota, Nov. 29-Dec. 1, is organized in association with the Colombian Defense Ministry.

Its aim is to “help governments and armed forces face their operational and capability challenges while playing a role in building a safer Latin America.” International exhibitors present their systems and products to respond to a growing regional demand. Expodefensa’s first edition was held in 2009.

In an earlier statement, the STM said it will promote its naval platforms and tactical mini-unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The firm said it will introduce its tactical mini-UAV product family – which includes Alpagu, Kargu and Togan – to South America, along with its MILGEM (National Ship) Ada-class corvettes as well as the I-class frigate, which is Turkey’s first national frigate project.

Colombian Defense Minister Diego Molano Aponte visited the STM booth at the event, and was briefed on the ongoing projects.

Colombian President Iván Duque also paid a visit to the fair with an accompanying delegation, receiving information from Aselsan on their products.

“We are proud to host the President of Colombia and foreign delegations in our booth at Expodefensa 2021, Bogota, Colombia,” read a tweet shared by the Aselsan’s Twitter account on Nov. 30.

Otokar, a company of Turkish conglomerate Koç Holding, meanwhile has presented its armored land vehicles at the fair.

Otokar General Manager Serdar Görgüç said in an earlier statement that Otokar, which achieves new successes in the world defense industry day by day, continues to make a name for itself with its global knowledge, engineering, research and development (R&D) and technology transfer.

“By participating in fairs held in five continents, we represent Turkey’s defense industry in the best way around the world, and we see these fairs as an important tool to come together with our current and potential users,” he said.

Turkish press: Why poke the bear if you are not a grizzly?

Dr. Karen Donfried appears before a Senate Committee on Foreign Relations hearing for her nomination to be an Assistant Secretary of State, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 20, 2021. (Reuters Photo)

Writing for Sputnik International, British journalist Finian Cunningham portrays U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Karen Donfried’s actions as “poking the bear.” Recently rehabilitated George W. Bush-era neo-con Donfried said that “all options were on the table as far as Russia’s policy towards Ukraine.”

“As you can appreciate, all options are on the table, and there’s a toolkit that includes a whole range of options.”

The term “all options” is a not-so-diplomatic nomenclature for war. Donfried was recently in Turkey and, speaking on tensions between the two NATO allies Turkey and Greece, said she regretted that the U.S. presence in Greece caused uneasiness in Ankara. Like “all options,” the term “regret” in diplomatic parlance is a very subtle way to accuse the other party. You made me put all my options on the table. If you hadn’t threatened Ukraine, I wouldn’t be considering all these options … or – Why are you making so much fuss about our turning practically one third of the dry land in Greece into our military base? See what you did? Now we are so sad, so disappointed in you … Shame, shame…

Donfried has worked at several intelligence and strategy offices and agencies that are open to civilians in the U.S. government. She collected as many academic degrees and honors, awards and praises as possible. Her last stint was at the German Marshall Fund. She belongs to the cohort appointed by U.S. President Joe Biden to the White House and State Department that allegedly represents new American militarism (national security adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Wendy Sherman the former adviser to secretaries of state Madeleine Albright/Hillary Clinton, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland, et. al.)

As all International Politics-101 students around the world know: (a) The U.S. cannot attack Russia as long as Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) is there as a military doctrine that warrants “a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two or more opposing sides would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender” and (b) Russia has nothing to win in occupying Ukraine. Yet Donfried uttered the “all options” idiom, which was not used by the chairperson of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, after talking to his Russian counterpart about Ukraine a few days earlier.

Milley, after discussing with Gen. Valery Gerasimov the increasing tensions over the Ukraine conflict and Black Sea region, went back to his business of defusing the tension by saying nothing. But, no! The White House and State Department faction was not satisfied, and Donfried had to bring every option to the table. This is only helping a Kyiv regime that has been amassing $3 billion worth of arms since 2014. They even bought Turkish aerial attack drones and tested them in a provocative assault against Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine, causing a Kremlin spokesperson to warn Turkey about its arms sales to Ukraine.

Turkey’s only motive in those sales was hot cash; yet its NATO membership was immediately misused by Russian (as well as the U.S.) media as if Turkey was taking part in this new scheme of American militarism, which, unlike Turkey’s policies, has many motives unrelated to foreign trade. They want to poke the Russian bear, as Cunningham points out, by interpreting “the menacing formula of words” that Washington deploys to mean a military attack on targeted nations like Iran, North Korea and Venezuela.

American movie maker Bill Standish used to warn that one should not poke the bear unless one is a grizzly oneself! The U.S. is not a bear, let alone a grizzly, yet. Former U.S. President Donald Trump played along with Bush and Barack Obama’s leftovers for a while, but he never invested billions of dollars in the Pentagon as his predecessors did. Biden himself has been complaining about the overspending in those endless wars that have actually deprived the U.S. of its vital striking power. Biden’s $2 trillion spending bill will eventually restore that power as well as the infrastructure, but the U.S. is not there yet. Besides, the 1998 evaluation of the “flexible response” defense strategy, authored by John F. Kennedy in 1961, showed that the U.S. can hardly fight multiple wars simultaneously. Now, on the one hand, conscripting India and Australia against China, and on the other, agitating poor Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a Ukrainian comedian-turned-politician who is still wondering how he became the president against the Russian bear, would be too much for Biden.

It is plausible for the people at the White House and the State Department to ignite the fuse before Vice President Kamala Harris and like-minded progressives take over in case Mr. Biden retires unexpectedly. We know how easily a brushfire on the shores of the Black Sea could easily engulf the entire democratic establishment, liberal and socialist alike; Kamala, the “squad,” even Bernie Sanders and others will be on the war wagon eventually.

But there are grown-ups in the U.S. Senate, the Pentagon and other places who aren’t aware that Ms. Donfried’s reckless rhetoric towards Russia needs to be stopped before it leads to war hysteria. One only hopes that if Biden really has a phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin that this provocation will come to an end.

Turkish press: Russia denies role in Donbass crisis after Erdoğan mediation offer

A Ukrainian soldier keeps watch at a position on the frontline with Russia-backed separatists not far from Gorlivka, Donetsk region, Ukraine, Nov. 25, 2021. (AFP Photo)

Russia is not part of the crisis in Donbass, the Kremlin said on Monday after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan had indicated Turkey could mediate between Kyiv and Moscow in solving increasing tensions.

“The fact is that Russia is not a party to the conflict in Donbass, it will be impossible to find solutions to the problem at such a summit,” Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told journalists in the capital Moscow, dismissing Ankara’s offer.

On his return flight from an official visit to Turkmenistan, Erdoğan told journalists: “It is our desire that the attitude in this matter develops in a positive direction. There could be a mediation about this, we will discuss this issue with them, we would like to have a share in the solution of this by developing these talks both with Ukraine and with Mr. Putin.”

Ukraine, on the other hand, welcomed the president’s statements.

“We will welcome any efforts that can help us to put an end to this war, to return Ukraine’s territories which are currently under Russian control,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba told a news briefing.

He also said that if Russia decides to invade, Ukraine is ready to repel any attack.

Ukraine’s military intelligence said last week that Russia had amassed more than 92,000 troops around Ukraine’s borders and was preparing for an attack by the end of January or the beginning of February.

NATO member Turkey has good ties with both Kyiv and Moscow, though it opposes Russian policies in Syria and Libya. It has forged energy and defense cooperation with Russia, while opposing Russia’s 2014 annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea peninsula.

Last month, Moscow said Ukraine’s Turkish-made drones risked having a destabilizing impact in east Ukraine, after Kyiv deployed one to hit a position controlled by Russian-backed separatists. Turkey has said it cannot be blamed for Ukraine’s use of the drones.

Fighting between Ukrainian government forces and pro-Russian separatists in Donbass has killed more than 13,000 people since 2014, according to the United Nations.

The region is one of the several sources of friction between Russia and Ukraine.