Artur Vanetsyan: The claims by authorities about captives are false and despicable

Panorama, Armenia
March 5 2021

The authorities, who lost the war, signed an humiliating agreement with Azerbaijan and do not represent  Armenia’s interests, have neither moral nor legal capacity to solve the issue of the captives,” former Chief of the National Security Service (NSS) Artur Vanetsyan told reporters on Friday.  

Vanetsyan, who is now the leader of Homeland opposition party, insisted only the new authorities may negotiate with Azerbaijani government through other lenses and solve the matter and return the captives within a short period of time.

“The false claims voiced by current leaders that the protests organised by the opposition Homeland Salvation Movement impede the process of returning the captives, are simply despicable and are aimed to cover up own incapacity while putting the blame on others,” said Vanetsyan. 

The former NSS Chief emphasized that the captives can return within days once there is a change of power in Armenia and when the authorities are replaced by national forces who can represent Armenia’s interests, have the capacity and possibility to form good relations with influential circles in third countries.  

Azerbaijani press: Azerbaijan’s State Tax Service registers Fuzuli Airport LLC

BAKU, Azerbaijan, March 2

By Fidan Babayeva – Trend:

The State Tax Service under the Ministry of Economy of Azerbaijan registered Fuzuli Airport LLC in January 2021, Trend reports citing the service.

According to the State Tax Service, the authorized capital of Fuzuli Airport LLC amounted to over 35.3 million manat ($20.7 million).

On January 14, President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev laid the foundations of the Fuzuli-Shusha road on the 27th kilometer of the Ahmadbeyli-Fuzuli-Shusha road and the airport in Fuzuli district.

The runway of the new airport is planned to be commissioned in 2021.

The construction of two international airports is planned in the territories of Azerbaijan liberated from the Armenian occupation.

Turkish press: Time stands still in Egypt’s century-old watchmaker shop

TelAviv: An open letter in defense of the good name of Armenia and its people by Israeli Academics

Arutz Sheva, Israel
March 4 2021
 Tags: Prof. Reuven Amitai

We the undersigned are Jewish and Israeli scholars in the field of Near and Middle Eastern studies. We are writing this open letter in defense of the honor and good name of a people and their country near our homeland: Armenia. We are writing this because there has been a campaign in the Israeli and Jewish press, we suspect funded by the government of Azerbaijan, to slander and defame the Armenians. One such article appeared on the Arutz Sheva website,(which, it should be added, also posted several articles explaining the Armenian viewpoint) in an article by Paul Miller on 23 February 2021, in the Jerusalem Post and Tablet.

The Armenians are an ancient civilization, and were the first to accept Christianity as their national faith. The Armenian Quarter in the Old City of our national capital, Jerusalem, has existed for fifteen hundred years. For sixteen centuries Armenians have written their language, which is distantly related to Greek, in a unique phonetic alphabet whose shape a scholar-saint perceived in a mystical vision. They carve delicate filigree crosses of volcanic stone. They have illuminated manuscripts that are treasures of world art.

The Armenians love to get together for sumptuous, hospitable dinners. They are a very sad people: as the nations around them converted to Islam and they did not, they became an island ravaged by invasions and depopulated by exile. Having lost independence, without political and military power, they created, as our people did, a kingdom of creativity, of good deeds. The far-flung Armenian community excelled in business, in medicine, and in the arts and letters— their name for diaspora comes from the Hebrew word galut. Although Armenia has no indigenous Jewish community, the presence of Hebrew religious terminology in Armenian suggests some very early connections.

A century ago, Ottoman Turkish nationalists used the First World War as a pretext to exterminate the Armenians, who were accused, as Jews often are, of being a disloyal fifth column. Some of the Turks’ Azerbaijani cousins participated in anti-Armenian pogroms in various places including a region called Mountainous Karabagh. A generation after the events, a Polish Jewish lawyer, Raphael Lemkin, coined the term “genocide” to describe what had been done to the Armenians and what was happening in the Second World War to our own people in Europe.

A Czech Jewish novelist, Franz Werfel, wrote The Forty Days of Musa Dagh, a bestseller about the successful armed resistance of Armenian villagers to Turkish deportation orders. The book inspired both our Warsaw Ghetto fighters in 1943 and our Haganah as it prepared to fight a last stand on Carmel if the Nazis broke through to the Land of Israel.

In the wake of World War I, the Western powers courted Turkish friendship in the crusade against Communism. The United States abandoned its policy of advocacy of the destitute, homeless survivors of the Armenian massacres. At the eastern edge of historical Armenia, in the Soviet-ruled Transcaucasus, a little Soviet Armenian survivor state was founded.

It used to be said of Israel that it had more nightmares per square block than any other country. Armenia was somewhat like this: broken people beset by memories of horror, trying to plant trees, build cities, and make a new life. In Israel, we made the desert bloom; the Armenians did the same on their rocky soil, but they had to contend with collectivization, Stalinist purges, the heavy hand of Big Brother to the north, and the attentive ear of the secret police.

When the Soviet Union broke up, extreme nationalist ideologies and religious extremism rushed into minds vacated by seven decades of enforced Communist dogma. Pent up ethnic tensions erupted into war both inside and between many former Soviet republics, including the neighbors Armenia and Azerbaijan. The two newly-independent countries went to war over the Armenian-majority enclave of Karabagh in Azerbaijan, whose population had demanded autonomy. Some thirty thousand lives were lost; and the Armenians gained both Karabagh and a wide strategic buffer zone of the surrounding districts. Nearly a million Azerbaijani refugees were forced to flee their homes and farms.

Oil-rich, pro-Western Azerbaijan, which borders Iran, meanwhile became a trading partner and ally of Israel, offering our air force parking space near the Iranian border. The present Iranian regime spews anti-Semitic calumny and vows to destroy Israel: after World War II it would be insane not to take such existential threats seriously. Moreover, there is a large and very old Jewish community in Azerbaijan. We stress here that we do not take issue with the vital national interests of our country and we offer no apology to anyone on earth for defending ourselves.

In the autumn of 2020, Azerbaijan launched a war to retake Karabagh. Russia sold arms to both sides; Turkey massively supported Azerbaijan with men and materiel, including high-tech drones; and Israel, too, sold drones and other materiel to its ally. Russia has a defense pact with Armenia, but since Armenia proper was not invaded, Putin chose to stand aside. In this way he was perhaps pursuing a longer-term strategy of wooing Turkey away from NATO.

Azerbaijan inflicted a crushing and total defeat on the Armenians: Russia stepped in at the last moment to broker a ceasefire agreement and station some peacekeeping forces of its army in the area. This was not Israel’s war. We have correct relations with Armenia. We should not be taking sides.

Antisemitism is deep-rooted and endemic in Armenia, though no more so than it is in most Christian societies. Several of us, scholars in Armenian studies, have experienced such prejudice first hand and on numerous occasions. Unsurprisingly, the recent war served as a pretext for such attacks on Israel, notably in social media. Azerbaijan took advantage of this to mount a propaganda offensive in the Jewish and Israeli media. Articles ostensibly by various authors from different places seem, interestingly, all to harp on the same two or three points.

These articles mention recent vandalism of the modest Holocaust memorial in the Armenian capital, Erevan. That is true; but it would be hard to name a country, sadly, whose Holocaust memorials have not been vandalized. Not to justify vandalism at all, one still must point out that the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial and research center in Israel carefully avoids all mention of the Armenian Genocide in its exhibits, despite the fact that Hitler was inspired by it in making his plans for the Final Solution. The more we know about the history of the Nazi movement, the more important a prototype – the murder of the Armenians – becomes.

The other main point the articles make is that Armenia erects statues and otherwise reveres the memory of Garegin Nzhdeh, a leader of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, or Dashnaktsutyun, who formed and commanded an Armenian unit in the Nazi army. In America in the 1930s, the Dashnaks organized a youth movement called the Race Worship Society. Although the party had a wide popular base and most Dashnaks did not participate in terrorist acts, its policies were often extremist. Dashnak hit men stabbed to death a survivor of the Armenian Genocide, Archbishop Ghevont Tourian, in his church in New York while he was celebrating Mass on Christmas. His crime? He had voiced support for tiny, newborn Soviet Armenia. Thousands of Armenian Americans were outraged by the murder, many were in uniform fighting Hitler a few years later.

But here’s the thing. An Armenian boy, also a survivor, was among the thousands of horrified worshippers who witnessed the murder in the Holy Cross Church of Armenia in upper Manhattan. His name was Avedis Derounian, and the crime inspired him to vow to fight fascism in his adopted country, America. Using the name John Roy Carlson, he infiltrated a number of extreme right-wing, antisemitic organizations: the America Firsters, the Silver Shirts, the German-American Bund, the supporters of Father Coughlin and Charles Lindbergh. His book, Under Cover, became a bestseller and wakened Americans to the menace of Nazi sedition at home. After the war, Derounian went to the Middle East: his book From Cairo to Damascus exposes the close ties of the corrupt Arab regimes to escaped Nazi war criminals hoping to finish the job by destroying Israel. Derounian, hounded by red-baiting Dashnaks during the McCarthy era (the Dashnaks have since rebranded themselves as “leftist” and “progressive”), lived out his remaining years in quiet obscurity, often spending his days in the B’nai Brith library. The Azeri propagandists prefer to forget Derounian. But should we?

We agree that what Nzhdeh did was criminal. But he is being commemorated in Armenia, not for his record in World War II but for his previous military role in the defense of the nascent first Armenian Republic after the Genocide of 1915.

And it’s easy to twist a story: most of the Armenians who were recruited into the Nazi Wehrmacht were Red Army prisoners of war who would have been killed in concentration camps, had they not joined his unit. For most of them it was the only way to avoid certain death; and many used it to escape back to the Soviet lines. These desertions made Hitler so mistrustful of the Armenian division of the Wehrmacht that he had it assigned the dangerous and important task… of guarding vineyards in the south of France. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of Soviet Armenians gave their lives in the fight against Hitler, rolling into battle in tanks with the name of the medieval Armenian epic hero David of Sasun painted on their sides. Many fought under Marshal Baghramian, commander of the Byelorussian front.

And back in France, north of those vineyards, a poet, factory worker, and survivor of the Armenian Genocide named Missak Manouchian was tasked by the Communist party with forming a unit to carry out especially dangerous missions for the Resistance. His comrades were Polish Jews and Spanish Civil War refugees. Manouchian and his fellow fighters for freedom were captured by the Gestapo, tortured, and killed. For years, Manouchian and his men were not thought “French” enough to be recognized by the country they died for. Now the propagandists of Azerbaijan, in painting the Armenians as Nazis, desecrate their memory anew.

It is easy to use a fact to tell a lie, as the Azerbaijan apologists do. We prefer to provide the truthful context to those facts, and to record the other facts that they omit. That is the difference between scholarship and propaganda, between truth and lies.

Azerbaijan is presented in this propaganda campaign as the best friend of the Jewish people. Again, that is not the true picture. We will adduce but one instance in which an Azeri community acted with deliberate and gratuitous hostility towards a defenceless Jew. Lev Nussimbaum grew up in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, and moved after the Russian Revolution to Berlin. He converted to Islam, took the name Kurban Said, and published a romantic novel, Ali and Nino. The hero is a Muslim boy; and the villain of the book is a rich Armenian with a big, black, long, powerful… car. During the years of the Nazi regime, the local Azerbaijani community in Germany kept fingering poor Mr. Said to the Gestapo as a Jew. He escaped to Italy and survived there, miraculously, in hiding. You will not find this unedifying incident in the panegyrics to Azerbaijani philo-Semitism.

We cannot address all the misinformation streaming out of Baku. But we would like to declare here that we, precisely as Jews and Israelis, support the right of the Armenian people to live as a free nation in their home land. We respect their ancient, honorable, unique culture. We condemn the hateful slander directed against them. We also condemn all expressions of antisemitism, regardless of their pretext. We oppose aggression against the Armenians and believe our country should have no part of it. We will stand by their side.

The first casualty of war is truth. We know this; and we know, too, the old Hasidic saying that the truth is ubiquitous because wherever it tries to live, people run it out of town. And we can add to the dossier this Armenian proverb: If you tell the truth, keep one foot in the stirrup. (That is, so you can make a fast getaway.)

There have been many wars, and they keep on happening because truth is a casualty in all of them. But the truth, rather like us, the People of the Book, can’t be killed. It keeps coming back. The dictators Putin and Erdogan can do what they please in their unhappy countries, sacrificing the innocents to play their dirty games, but not here. We will not let Azerbaijan’s propaganda factory, however much oil money it pays its agents, run the truth out of Israel. And we have both feet out of the stirrups and planted firmly on this ground: we will continue to bear witness to the truth and we are not going anywhere, either.

Signed:

James Russell, Mashtots Professor emeritus of Armenian Studies, Harvard University

Michael Stone, Professor emeritus of Armenian Studies and of Comparative Religion, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Yoav Loeff, Instructor in Armenian Studies, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Oded Steinberg,, Lecturer in International Relations and European Studies, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Reuven Amitai, Professor of Middle Eastern History, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem


  

Azerbaijani press: Azerbaijan, Iran negotiating to open customs post on border, in Khudaferin village

BAKU, Azerbaijan, Mar.4

By Elchin Mehdiyev, Jeyhun Alakbarov – Trend:

Negotiations are underway on the opening of the customs post on the border between Azerbaijan and Iran in Khudaferin village, Chairman of the Azerbaijani State Customs Committee Safar Mehdiyev said at a briefing, Trend reports on Mar.4.

“The negotiations are being held between the customs authorities and other structures of the two countries. It’s difficult to name a specific date for the post’s opening, but work is underway in this direction,” added Mehdiyev.

The village is located in Azerbaijan’s Jabrayil district liberated from Armenian occupation during the 44-day war (from late Sept. through early Nov.2020).

Azerbaijani press: Long-awaited end to Karabakh conflict creates new opportunities – Former US ambassador to Azerbaijan

BAKU, Azerbaijan, March 4

By Nargiz Sadikhova – Trend:

The long-awaited end of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict creates a number of new opportunities for both Azerbaijan and the entire region, Former US Ambassador to Azerbaijan Matthew Bryza said.

Bryza made the remark during an online webinar, Trend reports on March 4.

“The first such opportunity is to build the long-term peace,” former US ambassador to Azerbaijan added. “However, the current anti-government sentiments in Armenia and the possible dismissal of Nikol Pashinyan from the post of Armenian prime minister could become obstacles on the way to it.”

“The second opportunity is the implementation of West-East big transport projects and the attraction of all regional countries to them,” Bryza added. “This will also provide a good opportunity to involve Armenia in big regional projects, to which it was not previously involved because of the occupation of the Azerbaijani territories.”

Bryza also touched upon the importance of the recent signing of an agreement on the Dostlug oil and gas field.

“The fact that Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan have agreed on the joint development of this field is incredibly important and will undoubtedly have a positive effect on bilateral relations between the two countries,” former US ambassador to Azerbaijan said.

Azerbaijani press: US congressman Steve Cohen issues statement on Khojaly tragedy’s anniversary

BAKU, Azerbaijan, March 5

Trend:

Democrat Steve Cohen, co-chairman of the working group on Azerbaijan in the US Congress, representing Tennessee in the House of Representatives, made a statement on the 29th anniversary of the Khojaly tragedy, Trend reports on Mar.5 referring to the Azerbaijani Embassy in the country.

According to the statement, the murder of hundreds of residents of the city of Khojaly during the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict was the largest act of massacre against ethnic Azerbaijanis.

Stressing that 7,000 residents lived in Khojaly town, located in the Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, before the massacre of people by Armenian forces, the member of the US Congress noted that more than 600 civilians, including 106 women and 83 children, were killed, more than 100 children lost one of their parents, 25 children lost both parents, and 8 families were exterminated.

“Despite the 1994 ceasefire, the conflict wasn’t resolved. Hopefully, the parties will be able to achieve peace after the 2020 war,” said the statement, emphasizing that long-term peace, security and regional cooperation serve the interests of the South Caucasus region, as well as the whole world.

Following over a month of military action to liberate its territories from Armenian occupation from late Sept. to early Nov. 2020 (the second Karabakh war), Azerbaijan has pushed Armenia to sign the surrender document (and liberated the occupied territories). A joint statement on the matter was made by the Azerbaijani president, Armenia’s PM, and the president of Russia. A complete ceasefire and a cessation of all hostilities in the zone of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict were introduced on Nov. 10, 2020.

The congressman noted in his statement that Azerbaijan is a strong partner of the US and the country’s allies, as well as stressed the role of Azerbaijan in preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the service of Azerbaijani troops together with the US troops in the Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan, Azerbaijan’s provision of its territory for the transit of goods in order to provide coalition forces in Afghanistan, providing Europe with alternative energy sources through construction The Southern Gas Corridor from the Caspian Sea to Italy, as well as Azerbaijan’s provision of about 40 percent of the oil consumed by Israel.

The statement also paid special attention to cooperation with the Jewish community of Azerbaijan and Israel.

In conclusion, the member of the Congress once again revered the memory of the people who died as a result of the Khojaly tragedy, noting that he shares the grief of the Azerbaijanis.

Turkish press: Armenia destroyed Karabakh’s cultural heritage: Azerbaijani envoy

Russian peacekeepers and Azerbaijani servicepeople patrol the area at the entrance to the town of Shusha, Azerbaijan, Nov. 26, 2020. (Photo by Getty Images)

The total material damage Armenia inflicted on Azerbaijan amounts to more than $50 billion, Azerbaijan’s ambassador to Turkey told Anadolu Agency (AA) in an interview, also underlining Yerevan’s violation of international law through the destruction of cultural heritage in the Karabakh region.

“Apart from the occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent regions, and war crimes committed during the wars, Armenia violated the international law among others through the efforts of the destruction of cultural heritage, ecocides and theft of our natural wealth,” Khazar Ibrahim said on Thursday.

The two former Soviet republics experienced tense relations for three decades after the Armenian military started occupying Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent regions in 1991.

When new clashes erupted last September, the Armenian army launched attacks on civilians and Azerbaijani forces and violated several humanitarian cease-fire agreements.

During the six weeks of conflict, Azerbaijan liberated several cities and nearly 300 settlements and villages, which made up about 20% of the country’s territory, from occupation after almost 30 years.

“After the liberation, the sceneries in our historical lands seemed devastated,” Ibrahim said.

According to estimates, besides Azerbaijan’s residential and administrative buildings, 700 historic and cultural monuments, 927 libraries, 808 cultural centers, 85 music and art schools, 22 museums with over 100,000 artifacts, four art galleries, four theatres and two concert halls were damaged or destroyed by Armenian forces over the last three decades, the envoy said.

He mentioned that Azerbaijan has “large-scale post-war reconstruction plans” for restoring the liberated territories, adding that demining processes have been launched to realize these plans safely.

He stated that the transportation and infrastructure projects play a “crucial role” in the area, noting that in this context, right after the liberation of the city of Shusha, the construction of the international airport along with a new hundred kilometers highway from Fuzuli, involving three companies from Azerbaijan and Turkey, was announced.

Reconstruction in the liberated territories is being carried out in a way that reflects the historical and authentic heritage of the region while embracing modern technological innovations, Ibrahim said.

Modern smart cities built with cutting-edge technologies, infrastructure projects, agricultural activities, and energy supplies based on renewable resources are among the developmental goals of the region, he added.

The head of the diplomatic mission highlighted that apart from Azerbaijan, companies from Turkey, the U.K., Italy, Hungary, Japan, Israel, Iran and other states have already shown interest in contributing to the recently liberated lands.

He went on to say that as a result of the tripartite agreement signed last November, a corridor to Azerbaijan’s landlocked exclave Nakhchivan through Armenia was established. This corridor “engendered novel opportunities” for regional cooperation.

The two countries signed a Russian-brokered agreement on Nov. 10 to end the fighting and work toward a comprehensive resolution.

Azerbaijan plans to construct a highway and railway to Nakhchivan that will directly connect the country to “brotherly” Turkey, the envoy said.

Furthermore, Ibrahim said the restoration of the cultural and religious monuments destroyed and desecrated by Armenian forces during the occupation period has a “salient place” on the reconstruction agenda.

“Contrary to some popular disillusionment, Azerbaijan as a multi-confessional country will be involved in the restoration of cultural heritage belonging not only to Muslims but also Christians that have also been looted by Armenians,” he said.

“Indeed, there is too much work ahead in order to overcome the destructive burden of the occupation and it may require serious reconstruction efforts to make it possible for the internally displaced people to get back home. Only after the developmental plan is accomplished may the people return to their homes.”

Ibrahim said that as seen in previous attacks of the Armenian forces against Azerbaijani people, Armenia also continued “committing war crimes” in the recent 44-day war too.

“The Armenian army, which was incapacitated by our armed forces, did not hesitate to target civilians in cities that were not in the conflict zone. As a result, 100 of our citizens were killed, 416 were injured and serious damage to civilian infrastructure was caused,” he said.

He stated that the officials of the Armenian government “acknowledged their involvement” in the civilian attacks “once again,” adding that it was “another turn of events” happening in front of the world with its evidence and confessions.

Ibrahim said that during the second Nagorno-Karabakh war, some countries, international organizations and media outlets “turned a blind eye” to the real facts and “preferred the fabricated ones.”

“Certainly, infiltrating into the countries and societies where Armenian diaspora enrooted itself for decades and has omnipresence in almost all power circles is difficult yet achievable,” he said.

“In order to be heard, we need to perpetuate our work on reaching the world with the truth and destruct the prejudicial illusion constructed about the ‘victimhood’ of Armenians and ‘savageness’ of Turks.”

Quoting George Washington, “Truth will ultimately prevail where there are pains to bring it to light,” Ibrahim said in this regard, adding that they need “nothing more than really being heard and seen.” This requires more efficient diaspora activities among not only the ones who they like but also among those who “ignore and even have prejudices” against the Azerbaijani nation.

Turkish press: Human rights, mock fights and taking US seriously

U.S. President Joe Biden speaks during a meeting with Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and the chairs of the House committees to discuss a coronavirus relief package in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., Feb. 5, 2021. (EPA Photo)

Aletter from members of the U.S. House of Representatives last week for Secretary of State Anthony Blinken demanded that President Joe Biden increase the pressure on alleged human rights abuses in Turkey.

In February last month, U.S. senators, this time in a letter to Biden, criticized Turkey’s fight against the terrorist organizations PKK/YPG and again demanded that it stop operations in Syria over the same so-called human rights rhetoric.

There are many reasons to think that these letters to the Biden administration from members of Congress are a good cop, bad cop game. In fact, they appear to be an act of consultation that seem to be a mock fight between the U.S. Congress, the Senate, the White House and the State Department.

However, every time Turkey says that a controversial issue between the two countries should be resolved through dialogue and calls on the Washington administration to “talk,” it is very doubtful that Congress will receive the opposite statement. So it is possible to say that this bad policing of Congress has given the Biden administration time and comfort in relation to Turkey.

How can it be explained that the U.S. Congress, on one hand, is trying to lecture Turkey on human rights, which played a key role in solving the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, and on the other hand, is turning its back to the facts in U.S. intelligence reports?

How can Turkey’s state, intelligence, judiciary, police and media, as well as its role and effort in shedding light on this murder, be ignored?

Although all the findings in the U.S. intelligence report indicated that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) was behind the Khashoggi murder, the world did not hear from Biden about a sanctions decision against him. However, perhaps one of the most inhumane murders of this century was committed against a journalist, and the U.S. Congress could not even pass or even appeal for a sanction resolution against MBS.

What about the human rights of civilians killed by the PKK terrorist organization and its Syrian branch, the YPG, who continue to slaughter innocent people in Syria? Did the U.S. Congress pay tribute to the 13 unarmed Turkish citizens the PKK massacred after holding them captive for six years? Now that a U.S. Congress that is so selective about human rights is criticizing Turkey, it brings to mind that famous Indian proverb: “’If you point a finger at someone, three fingers are pointing back at you.”

All these hypocritical stances actually allow us to understand the answer to the questions of “who, what and why” Congress puts an emphasis on human rights. If the debate were really for human rights, a strong and decisive counter-stance would be expected from the U.S. administration and Congress against terrorist organizations and states or persons using terrorist methods.

Moreover, if democracy was the real issue here, wouldn’t the United States be expected to condemn the coup attempt in Armenia? Whether or not the U.S. State Department wants Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian to be overthrown by the Armenian military, it should be supported by democratic principles and moral norms – but the U.S. has not offered such support. Instead, he declared that there were not enough conditions to describe the events in Armenia as a coup.

It is clear Washington will run with the hare and hunt with the hounds in the coming period. For instance, the initial statement of the U.S. State Department spokesperson against the Turkish citizens who were massacred by the PKK, and his following statements could be explanatory evidence of this situation. Spokesperson Ned Price hinted that they could condemn the massacre if they were certain that the PKK had killed the 13 Turkish citizens. On one hand, the U.S. government cannot be sure that the PKK/YPG has killed them, and on the other hand, he can openly say that Turkey and the U.S. share interests and signaled for cooperation in Syria where the U.S. is still a major guarantor of the PKK/YPG’s presence in there.

In addition, the same spokesperson issued a condemning statement on behalf of the U.S. government over the brutal attack by forces loyal to Bashar Assad’s regime that killed 34 Turkish soldiers in northwestern Syria’s Idlib province a year ago.

Another striking statement this week came from Blinken. In the statement, he said that using people as pawns for political purposes is unacceptable behavior, no matter what the country does.

Based on this explanation, the list of people, nonstate actors or groups that the U.S. has used as a pawn against other countries in the past is quite bulky. Turkey has a long list relating to this issue, including the leaders of the Gülenist Terror Group (FETO) and the PKK/YPG.

In this regard, Biden’s confession to supporting opposition groups in Turkey during the elections remains fresh. Based on all this, it seems necessary that future messages from Washington about human rights, the fight against terrorism, alliances, common interests and relations with Turkey should first be submitted to a polygraph.

In the coming period, we will see whether the future messages from the U.S. Congress, the White House and the State Department toward Turkey are really a difference of opinion or good police, bad police diplomacy.