PAC Launches ‘Yes, It’s Genocide’ Online Grassroots Petition



Yes It’s Genocide

GLENDALE—The Pan Armenian Council of Western United States and its member organizations have launched an online petition urging President Joseph R. Biden to honor his pledge to reaffirm U.S. recognition of the Armenian Genocide in his annual remembrance statement by properly acknowledging the mass murder of 1.5 million Armenian men, women, and children by the Ottoman Turkish government as genocide.

The online petition, hosted on change.org—an activism portal —provides a simple form to take action. The petition aims to collect thousands of signatures by April 24, 2021.

The campaign calls on the White House to end this shameful chapter of U.S. complicity in Turkey’s denial of this unpunished crime against humanity and unequivocally affirm the official U.S. policy established in a near unanimous historic bipartisan _expression_ by Congress in 2019 through the passage of H.Res.296 and S.Res.150.  Individuals are strongly urged to add their names to the petition to ensure that their voices are heard.

To sign the petition, please visit yesitsgenocide.org.

The Pan Armenian Council of Western USA is a community wide coalition of 23 organizations. It serves as a meeting ground for influential leading organizations to foster mutual understanding, coordination of efforts and consensus-building, all in the name of collective community interests and the welfare of Armenia and Artsakh.

Pan Armenian Council of Western United States of America and its member organizations:
Armenian Assembly of America
Armenian Bar Association
Armenian Catholic Eparchy of Our Lady of Nareg of North America
Armenian Democratic Liberal Party Western District
Armenian General Benevolent Union, Western District
Armenian Evangelical Union of North America
Armenian Missionary Association of America
Armenian National Committee of America, Western Region
Armenian Relief Society of Western USA
Armenian Revolutionary Federation of Western USA
Armenian Society of Los Angeles – Iranahay Miutyun
Armenian Youth Association of California – Irakahay Miutyun
Armenian Youth Federation of Western USA
Hamazkayin Armenian Educational and Cultural Society of the Western USA
Homenetmen Western USA
Iraqi Armenian Family Association of Los Angeles
Kessab Educational Association
Organization of Istanbul Armenians
Service Employees International Union – Armenian Caucus
Southern California Armenian Democrats
Tekeyan Cultural Association
Unified Young Armenians
Western Diocese of the Armenian Church of North America
Western Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America 





Armenian president discusses snap election with head of ruling parliamentary bloc

TASS, Russia
Earlier in the day, the president and premier held a meeting to focus on the political situation in the country

YEREVAN, March 13. /TASS/. Armenian President Armen Sarkissian and Lilit Makunts, the leader of the My Step ruling parliamentary bloc, focused on the current situation in the country, the solutions to the political crisis and an early parliamentary election at their meeting on Saturday, the presidential press service said.

“Today during the talks with parliamentary and non-parliamentary political forces, President of the Republic of Armenia Armen Sarkissian held a meeting with Lilit Makunts, the leader of the My Step ruling parliamentary faction,” the statement says. “They discussed the situation in the country and the ways to resolve it and end the internal political crisis. In this context, the sides emphasized the significance of agreements to call an early parliamentary election.”

Earlier in the day, Sarkissian and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan held a meeting to focus on the political situation in the country and considered holding snap parliamentary elections, the presidential press service said.

Moscow Declines to Comment on Aliyev’s ‘Zangezur is Armenian’ Comment



The Gates of Zangezur in Armenia

Putin Holds Phone Conversation with Aliyev, Pashinyan

The Russian foreign ministry of Friday declined to comment on Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s revisionist and threatening declaration that Armenia’s Zangezur is a “historic Azerbaijani territory.”

Aliyev made the statement on March 5 during a speech at an economic summit, saying that a so-called corridor linking mainland Azerbaijan to Nakhichavan would run through Zangezur.

A reporter for Armenia’s Public Television channel on Friday asked Russian foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharove whether Moscow considered Aliyev’s statement about Zangezur a gross violation of international law and an infringement of Armenia’s sovereignty, and whether it was a violation of the tripartite statement signed on November 9 on the unblocking of regional transport communications and routes, reported the Arka news agency.

Zakharova sidestepped the question and instead praised the “generally constructive approach demonstrated by both Baku and Yerevan within the framework of the trilateral working group chaired by the vice-premiers of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan,” Arka reported.

Zakharova stressed that the main task of the working group has been to find ways for unblocking all economic and transport links in the region.

“We hope that the same focus on positive and mutually acceptable points of contact will prevail both in official comments and in Armenian and Azerbaijani mass media,” added Zakharova.

With such a provocative statement, calling Zangezur an ‘historic Azerbaijani territory’ and making reference to an imaginary corridor, the President of Azerbaijan deliberately undermines the implementation of the November 9 and January 11 trilateral statements,” said Armenia’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Anna Naghdalyan last week. She stressed that “Article 9 of the November 9 trilateral statement does not mention the establishment of a corridor.”

“Such rhetoric contradicts Azerbaijan’s obligations. It is a blatant challenge to international law, and in no way does it contribute to the stability of the region and threatens all states in the region,” added Naghdalyan last week.

 

On Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin held telephone conversations with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Aliyev.
The Kremlin reported that Putin discussed practical aspects of the implementation of the November 9 and January 11 agreements on Karabakh and observed that the ceasefire was strictly being respected and the regional situation remained stable and calm.
The Kremlin statement added that Pashinyan and Aliyev reportedly praised “the productive activities of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in the contact line and along Lachin corridor.”

Issues related to unblocking economic and transport links in the South Caucasus were also discussed, with the sides saying they were satisfied with the activities of the working group co-chaired by the deputy prime ministers of the three countries.
Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan held a telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
A readout of the call from Pashinyan’s office also added that he and Putin discussed Armenia-Russia cooperation issues.

Protesters and police clash outside Presidential residence in Armenia

TASS, Russia
Earlier, the presidential administration announced that the president was scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on March 13 to discuss ways out of the crisis

YEREVAN, March 13. /TASS/. Clashes between opposition supporters and the police took place on Saturday outside of the residence of Armenian President Armen Sarkissian, where he met with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

The protesters tried to break through the police cordon, but were pushed back by law enforcement officers. The protesters were chanting “Armenia without Nikol” and “Nikol is a traitor”.

Earlier, the presidential administration announced that the president was scheduled to meet with Pashinyan on March 13 to discuss ways out of the crisis.

L.A. City Council Reaffirms Support for Artsakh; Suspends L.A.-Shushi Friendship City



L.A. City Councilmember Paul Krekprian at the inauguration of the LA-Shushi friendship park in Artsakh

The Los Angeles City Council unanimously voted to reaffirm the city’s support for the people of Artsakh and temporarily suspend the LA-Shushi Friendship City agreement, “for as long as it is illegally controlled by Azerbaijan.”

The resolution was introduced by Councilmember Paul Krekorian and seconded by Councilmember Mitch O’Farrell, before the City Council voted to unanimously adopted a resolution reaffirming the support of the City of Los Angeles towards the people of the Republic of Artsakh.

“The historic struggle of the people of Artsakh, including the 1991-94 war, is similar to the struggle of all peoples who created a democratic state/nation, that adhere to the values of liberty and self-determination through free and fair elections, including the United States of America,” said the resolution.

The resolution referenced the City Council’s 2013 recognition of Artsakh as an independence and sovereign state, as well as a December 2020 decision to support “the struggle of the Republic of Artsakh and its people for self-determination, and called upon the United States federal government to do likewise.”

In addressing last fall’s Artsakh War, the L.A. City Council resolution stressed that “throughout the brutal invasion, Azerbaijan terrorized civilians by targeting them with munitions that are widely banned and condemned by the international community, including cluster bombs and white phosphorus.” The resolution further states that “major combat operations ended on November 9, 2020, although Azerbaijan’s forces have continued to engage in violence, aggression and cruelty even after that date.”

“Therefore, be it resolved that by the adoption of this resolution the City of Los Angeles honors and mourns the thousands of lives lost in this attack, and declares November 9, 2020 a day of remembrance and commemoration of the victims of Azerbaijan’s aggression against the Republic of Artsakh,” the city council affirmed.

The city council also voted to “temporarily suspend its ‘Friendship City’ relationship with Shushi for as long as it is illegally controlled by Azerbaijan, and will renew that status when Shushi is again free of Azeri conquest and oppression and restored to democratic governance as part of the Republic of Artsakh.”

“Having been abandoned by the international community, and facing an existential threat to Artsakh and the very real potential for another genocide of the Armenian people, Armenia signed a cease-fire statement brokered by Russia that allows Azerbaijan to control much of Artsakh, specifically including the city of Shushi,” said the resolution, which also recalled the city council’s April 24, 2012 decision to adopt Shushi as a “Friendship City.”

“The City Council of Los Angeles extends its warm greetings, support and best wishes for safety and security to Shushi’s Mayor Artsvik Sargsyan and the entire democratically elected leadership of Shushi, and the City Council further looks forward to the day that Shushi is once again liberated from Azeri occupation,” said the LA City Council.

Asbarez: ‘Meeting Around One Table Doesn’t Seem Feasible,’ Says President



President Armen Sarkissian

President Armen Sarkissian has concluded that a meeting he proposed to discuss the deepening political crisis in Armenia with the country’s major political players would not be feasible, given the varying responses his office has received about the invitation.

“Taking into account that the My Step and the Bright Armenia parliamentary factions have accepted the President’s invitation for a meeting, the Prosperous Armenia faction and the Homeland Salvation Movement proposed their own agenda for the meeting and presented conditions, at this moment meeting around one table does not seem feasible, a statement issued by the president’s office late Friday.

In addition to the aforementioned participants cited in the statement, the president had also invited Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who did not respond to Sarkissian’s proposal.

“President Armen Sarkissian will continue his efforts. He is ready to have separate meetings both with those invited, as well as with members of parliament not included in the factions of the National Assembly, with the representatives of different extra-parliamentary political forces,” said the Friday statement.

“These meetings will provide an opportunity, once again, to hear everyone’s views, to further clarify positions, and to formulate a working agenda based on results,” said the president’s office. “The President of the Republic reaffirms his conviction that the only way to resolve differences is through negotiations and dialogue, and that everything must be done to keep the country from tremors.”

The Liberal Project and Its Relevance for Armenia

Modern Diplomacy

By Dr. Andrey KORTUNOV

The relatively recent (2017) Hollywood blockbuster Thor: Ragnarok has a memorable scene of the heavenly kingdom of Asgard collapsing. A happenstance witness to and participant in Ragnarok, the last battle between the good and the evil, King of Asgard and God Thor, finds himself unable to avert this disaster. Suddenly, when everything seems hopelessly lost, he has a revelation: “Asgard’s not a place, it’s a people.” And he sets about evacuating his people from the collapsing city.

At this point, Thor recasts himself from an aloof autocratic deity into a dynamic liberal leader. Certainly, he is no neoliberal postmodernist of the early 21st century, but rather a classical liberal of the late 18th century. He realizes that the main value of his kingdom is not the land, the state, property or mystical artifacts, but its people. Men and women. Old and young. All of them together and each of them individually. If the people remain, a new Asgard could be built, even at the other rim of the universe.

The latest events in Armenia are certainly not a Ragnarok yet, nor a trump of doom or the harbinger of a collapsing Armenian state. But amid the recent military defeat aggravated by a calcifying divide in the Armenian society coupled with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and an economic recession, the situation in the country is extremely precarious. It is no longer merely a question of whether Nikol Pashinyan will stay in power, or what the relations between the civil authorities and the military leadership will look like, or in what terms the status of Nagorno-Karabakh will be ultimately defined. The question now concerns the future of the Armenian statehood, it being more serious than ever before in the 30 years of Armenia’s post-Soviet history.

The situation is further exacerbated by the fact that the prospects of Armenia embarking on a path of liberal democracy have lost much of their lustre over the last couple of years. Many hopes had been pinned on Nikol Pashinyan’s tenure, but it brought Armenia neither the promised prosperity nor stability. Pessimism, social apathy and cynicism, as well as disillusionment with democratic institutions and the path of democratic development, are therefore on the rise. It is no accident that calls for transferring power to a technical “government of national accord” are increasingly heard in Yerevan. Some even go on to suggest it would be a good idea to bring the military into power for a while.

Yet, is there a viable alternative to the liberal project in Armenia? From the traditional Realpolitik perspective, Armenia is doomed. The country, with a population of about three million and a territory smaller than the Moscow Region, has no significant oil and gas reserves like the neighbouring Azerbaijan, nor does it have fertile lands like Georgia, Armenia’s another neighbours. The geopolitical situation is dispiriting for Armenia: the country does not even share a common border with Russia, its ally, and is surrounded by an openly hostile alliance of Turkey and Azerbaijan as well as two rather ‘backhanded’ partners, Iran and Georgia. Going back to the “pre-Pashinyan” era would mean Armenia having to get used to the role of a humble petitioner camping on the doorsteps of the faraway Kremlin offices year in and year out.

The liberal democratic paradigm is Armenia’s best chance for a future. The first, most urgent and most important task is not to merely reform the political system but to design a new national idea that would lead society away from the pernicious temptations of endless irredentism. Obsessive ideas of continuing the confrontation with Azerbaijan and taking back the lands lost last year must become a thing of the past.

Like Asgard, Armenia is not a place, it is a people. Apart from the three million Armenians living within their nation-state, the notion also includes some seven or eight million that live beyond its borders, yet do, in some manner, feel that they belong to the “Armenian world.”

Armenia’s main comparative advantage has always been its diaspora, something unique its neighbours do not have. Until now, the diaspora has treated Armenia much in the same way that successful young urbanites tend to treat their aging parents who live out the rest of their days in a ramshackle village somewhere far away: Money transfers (sometimes quite generous), trips home to soak up the nostalgia, traditional “kebab and cognac” get-togethers, declarative support for the “Armenian cause”—little else ties the diaspora with its historical homeland of global “Armenian-ness.”

If Armenia reverts to the “pre-Pashinyan” era, even this level of support will be very hard to sustain. And transforming the country into an attractive investment hub for the diaspora’s substantial funds will be nigh on impossible. Radically new development priorities are required to transform Armenia from the eternal “relation in need” into a country of opportunity. A country that lives not only by its past, but also by its future. Public discussions should focus on the continued search for such development priorities, rather than on some chimeric scenarios of “taking Artsakh back.”

Today, Armenia’s technocrats speak of the prospects of developing the country as a transportation and logistics corridor for the South Caucasus. However, here the country will face tough competition in the form of alternative transit projects, including those that involve the trans-Caspian route. There are plans to transform Armenia into a giant Caucasus mining farm, but Georgia has already beaten it to the punch. Armenia could still become a regional leader in developing the “green energy” sector, especially since there are many areas that abound in sun and wind and are short on rain and snow, areas with high mountains and unpopulated plateaus.

In any case, Armenia is now facing the task of reviving its scientific and technological potential, dramatically improving the quality of its “human capital” and warding off the emerging provincialism. All this requires the public spirit to be radically “demilitarized,” while preserving democratic institutions and procedures as a sine qua non.

The liberal project for Armenia by no means demands that Yerevan turn away from Moscow and pin all its hopes on the West. However, Russia–Armenia relations should be built as relations between two equal partners rather than on the basis of patron-client ties. Being a member of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), Armenia may just become the principal venue for Russia to promote its multilateral developmental projects in the Caucasus, involving Georgia and Azerbaijan.

Given its unique geopolitical situation, Armenia could also claim the role of a bridge between Russia and Europe, between the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union.

Armenia’s potential role in long-term “Greater Caucasus” integration projects is no less important. Given the region’s ethnic and religious diversity, lasting peace and development in the Caucasus are only possible if it is gradually and steadily transformed from a set of states into a community of regions (which, historically, the Caucasus has nearly always been). This single ecosystem could also include Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia, South Ossetia and other historically shaped areas with their unique identities.

Such models do exist in today’s world. For example, the Swiss Confederation, where individual cantons are not united into a Swiss Germany, a Swiss France and a Swiss Italy, while enjoying considerable autonomy within a single ecosystem. Clearly, conservative groups among the national elites will be against such a “Caucasus of the regions,” being mostly interested in exerting as much control as possible over their states, both recognized and unrecognized. They are in no way interested in delegating even some of their powers to the regional level. Therefore, a stable and harmonious ecosystem in the Caucasus will hardly emerge in the near future. The Swiss Confederation did take a few centuries to emerge, though.

From our partner RIAC

Armenpress: President Sarkissian undergoing medical examinations at Asghik Medical Center

President Sarkissian undergoing medical examinations at Asghik Medical Center

Save

Share

 18:05,

YEREVAN, MARCH 12, ARMENPRESS. President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian has complications caused by coronavirus, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the President’s Office.

”The President has complications caused by coronavirus and now he is undergoing medical examination at Astghik Medical Center”, a press service official said.

Sarkissian tested positive for the coronavirus days after travelling to the United Kingdom in late December to spend New Year’s Eve with his sons and grandchildren living in London.

The presidential office announced on January 13 that Sarkissian was hospitalized there after developing double pneumonia and showing other symptoms of COVID-19. It said on January 26 that he has been discharged from hospital but has not yet fully recovered from the disease.




Artsakh’s President appoints Vahan Badasyan President’s representative on special assignments

Artsakh’s President appoints Vahan Badasyan President’s representative on special assignments

Save

Share

 17:32,

YEREVAN, MARCH 12, ARMENPRESS. President of Artsakh Arayik Harutyunyan signed a decree on March 12, appointing Vahan Badasyan President’s representative on special assignments, who will be engaged in issues related to security and displaced people, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the President’s Office of Artsakh.

After nearly 40 years, man who assassinated Turkish consul in L.A. is getting parole

Los Angeles Times

An Armenian American man convicted of killing a Turkish official in Los Angeles in the 1980s will be released into ICE custody after a parole board’s determination that he is not currently dangerous, his attorney said Friday.

Hampig “Harry” Sassounian’s pending release comes after the Los Angeles County Superior Court last month vacated Gov. Gavin Newsom’s decision reversing that parole, and over the objections of the U.S. State Department. For years, lawyers and advocates for Sassounian have argued that he has shown remorse for his crime and that he should be released after serving nearly 40 years in prison.

On Jan. 28, 1982, Sassounian and a crime partner approached Turkish Consul General Kemal Arikan’s car when it stopped at an intersection on the Westside and fired multiple shots, killing the diplomat while he was on his way to work. The pair fled, according to media reports at the time, and Sassounian, then 19, was later apprehended. A jury found him guilty of first-degree murder and found that Sassounian killed Arikan because of his nationality.

The second suspect left the country and was never tried for the crime. A group calling itself the Justice Commandos of the Armenian Genocide called news outlets a few minutes after the assassination to claim responsibility, media reports said. Sassounian denied being a member of that group.

Advertisement

Court records show that Sassounian said that he killed Arikan because he and the other suspect were seeking revenge for the Turkish government’s refusal to acknowledge its role in the Armenian genocide.

In Southern California, home to the largest Armenian community outside of Armenia, news of Sassounian’s impending release set off a communal sigh of relief after years of advocacy on his behalf.

“This is something that everybody rallied around when it happened, and over the last 40 years,” said Nora Hovsepian, chair of the Armenian National Committee of America’s Western region. “Not because anyone condones violence — that’s not the point. .. he did his time. He rehabilitated himself.”

She added: “It’s not the specific act that he engaged in, but it’s an understanding of what led to it. He was so young when he was arrested, and he kind of became a symbol of the ongoing injustice that we as a community continue to suffer at the hands of the Turks.”

Armen Karaoghlanian, 33, of Glendale said that he has been following Sassounian’s case for about a decade, reading the court transcripts and conducting his own research.

For him, Sassounian’s release represents a symbolic triumph for a community that sees itself fighting an “uphill battle” against a nation with greater political and financial clout. Bitter memories of the 1915-1923 massacre carried out by the Ottoman Turks continue to profoundly shape Armenian and Armenian American identity.

As recently as last September, Armenian and Azerbaijani forces began fighting what escalated into a bloody six-week war over a border region known as Nagorno-Karabakh — referred to as the Republic of Artsakh by Armenians. Azerbaijan, supported by its close ally Turkey, recovered significant territory it ceded to Armenia in a previous war over the region that ended in 1994.

The cease-fire brokered in November lingers as a wound for many in the local Armenian community.

“We constantly feel like this underdog trying to fight for what’s right,” Karaoghlanian said. “So I think this is a [win] for us all, because we feel like we finally got something right. And we’re just disappointed that it took so long to get to this point.”

But Sassounian’s upcoming release has provoked outrage in Turkey and among some in the U.S. Turkish community.

Can Oguz, Turkey’s current consul general to Los Angeles, condemned the decision, calling it a dangerous precedent that jeopardizes the security of diplomats around the world.

It’s “based on political considerations, rather than the fundamental principles of the law,” Oguz said by phone. “Hampig Sassounian has shown no remorse for the heinous crime he committed and is not rehabilitated.”

Sassounian’s attorney disputed that claim.

According to a 2020 executive report on parole review decisions from Newsom, the Board of Parole Hearings found Sassounian “suitable for parole, noting that as a child he was subjected to the trauma of war and political strife, that he has participated in self-help programming in prison, he has developed extensive parole plans, he has taken responsibility for the harm that he has caused, he has demonstrated a history of change and increased maturity, and he has given serious thought to how his actions are perceived by others.”

The board also concluded that he possessed the tools necessary to avoid resorting to violence. Sassounian has an active ICE detainer, the report noted, and is subject to deportation if released on parole.

Representatives from the Turkish government expressed their opposition to both state and federal officials, and Oguz said he hopes that federal authorities will intervene to overturn the decision.

Turkey memorialized its “martyred diplomat Kemal Arikan” on the anniversary of the murder earlier this year, and claimed that “Armenian terrorists” have assassinated around 30 Turkish diplomats through the decades all over the world, according to Turkey’s Anadolu news agency.

Arikan “will be remembered with respect as a distinguished diplomat,” Serdar Kilic, who was Turkey’s ambassador to the U.S. until this month, said on the occasion, the news agency said.

A spokesperson for Newsom’s office said that he “has carefully weighed the factors in this case” and that he will not pursue an appeal.

Newsom wrote in his 2020 executive report that he had considered the circumstances that shaped Sassounian’s life when determining whether he should be paroled. The governor pointed to “significant challenges in his family of origin, including the consequences of intergenerational trauma, poverty, and instability resulting from the Armenian genocide in which Mr. Sassounian’s family members were killed.”

After forced deportation from Anatolia, Newsom wrote, Sassounian’s family lived in exile in Lebanon where he “grew up in a war zone and regularly witnessed extreme violence and killings, an experience that had a significant impact on his life.”

In prison, he said, Sassounian participated in self-help programs including substance abuse treatment, nonviolent communication and anger management. He has not, he noted, been disciplined for “serious misconduct” in nearly 20 years.

“I commend Mr. Sassounian for his rehabilitative efforts in prison, but I find they are outweighed by negative factors that show he remains unsuitable for parole at this time,” Newsom said at the time.

Sassounian was granted parole in December 2019, according to the governor’s office, and Newsom reversed the parole grant last May. L.A. County Superior Court Judge William C. Ryan vacated the governor’s reversal in February.

On Thursday, U.S. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken released a statement saying that the Department of State is “deeply disappointed by the expected grant of parole.”

“Attacking a diplomat is not only a grave crime against a particular individual, it is also an attack on diplomacy itself,” Blinken said. “To ensure the safety of the dedicated U.S. diplomats serving around the world, it has been the long-standing position of the United States to advocate that those who assassinate diplomats receive the maximum sentence possible, and that they serve those sentences without parole or early release.”

Sassounian’s attorney, Susan L. Jordan, said he has been “appropriately punished.”

“Yes, he committed a horrible crime and caused damage, but at end of the day it boils down to whether he’s currently dangerous,” Jordan said. “And if he’s not, when he has served his time, the law says at that point he is ready to be released.”