Two suspected novel coronavirus cases in Artsakh pending test results

Save

Share

 14:50, 5 March, 2020

YEREVAN, MARCH 5, ARMENPRESS. There are no novel coronavirus cases in Artsakh, the country’s chief epidemiologist Karine Balayan told ARMENPRESS.

“Monitoring continues in Artsakh both towards locals and tourists”, she said, adding that they are closely cooperating with Armenia’s healthcare authorities.

Meanwhile, Artsakh’s State Sanitary and Anti-Epidemic Inspection Agency Chief Ofelya Harutyunyan told ARMENPRESS that they have two suspected cases in the Martuni region. She said the two persons have arrived from Iran two weeks ago and have been under monitoring since because they have fever. “They have been tested and the samples have been sent to Yerevan pending results. It may turn out to be the simple flu, but we have suspicions because they’ve arrived from Iran,” Harutyunyan said.

She said the persons are a husband and wife and are feeling well.

Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan




Number of coronavirus cases in Azerbaijan reaches 6

Save

Share

 15:10, 5 March, 2020

YEREVAN, MARCH 5, ARMENPRESS. Number of people infected with the novel coronavirus in Azerbaijan has reached 6, the country’s authorities said, RIA Novosti reported.

Earlier three cases of Covid-19 were confirmed in Azerbaijan. One of the patients is a citizen of Russia.

“Three other people, who came from Iran, were infected with the coronavirus”, an official said, adding that one of them is a German national, the other two are citizens of Azerbaijan.

Edited and translated by Aneta Harutyunyan




Putin, Erdogan start Syria talks in Kremlin

Save

Share

 15:49, 5 March, 2020

YEREVAN, MARCH 5, ARMENPRESS. Russian and Turkish Presidents Vladimir Putin and Recep Tayyip Erdogan started their talks on Syria in the Kremlin on March 5, reports TASS.

The talks are focusing on the situation in Syria’s Idlib de-escalation area. As Russian Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov earlier told reporters, the Kremlin expects both leaders to reach common understanding on the causes and the consequences of the Idlib crisis and to work out “a set of necessary joint measures to subsequently stop it.”

Russia, Turkey and Iran signed a memorandum in May 2017 that included the Idlib province in one of four de-escalation areas in Syria. In September 2018, the Russian and Turkish presidents agreed at their talks in Sochi to set up a de-militarized zone in that province 15-20 km deep along the contact line between the Syrian government troops and the armed opposition.

Despite the accords reached, radical militants were not withdrawn from Idlib and they continued shelling the government troops’ positions. The situation in the Idlib province has escalated several times since then, including at the beginning of 2020.

Turkish state news agency distorts the facts: ECHR called the Khojaly events into question

Save

Share

 16:54, 5 March, 2020

Turkish state news agency “Anadolu” distorted the provisions of the verdict related to the Khojaly events. Along with the fake propaganda thesis by Azerbaijan, the article published on February 26 illuminated the official verdict of “Fatullayev vs Azerbaijan” case completely out of the context and obviously distorted.

According to their claims, ECHR stated that “what happened in Khojaly amounts to a war crime or a crime against humanity”. These false claims were later on spread by an Arabic website – Albosala.com.

Fatullayev VS Azerbaijan

In 2007 Azerbaijan’s law enforcement organs opened a criminal case against the editor-in-chief of the “Real Azerbaijan” journal Eynula Fatullayev accusing him of “statements of defamations” related to the Khojaly events. Taken as the basis to launch a criminal case were Fatullayev’s critical articles about the state officials published on the pages of “Real Azerbaijan” as well as the articles containing evidence contradicting the official thesis about the events in Khojaly (ECHR verdict, 1st paragraph). In February 2005, the editor of the journal started his thread of articles under “Karabakh diary” name, summing up his thoughts after his 10-day visit to the Republic of Artsakh.

“I have visited this town [Naftalan] where I have spoken to hundreds (I repeat, hundreds) of refugees who insisted that there had been a corridor and that they had remained alive owing to this corridor … [They were killed] not by [some] mysterious [shooters], but by provocateurs from the NFA battalions … [The corpses] had been mutilated by our own …”(1,2,3).

He was sentenced to a prison term by the Azerbaijani court and appealed the decision of the court in ECHR where the verdict of the court was assessed as an act of violation of Fatullayev’s rights in a number of provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights, ordering the immediate release of the journalist from the Azerbaijani authorities.

ECHR verdict and the Khojaly events

On the 87th paragraph of the official verdict of the ECHR on Khojaly states, “Moreover, the Court notes that it is an integral part of freedom of _expression_ to seek historical truth. At the same time, it is not the Court’s role to arbitrate the underlying historical issues which are part of a continuing debate between historians that shapes opinion as to the events which took place and their interpretation. Court accordingly considers that it is not its task to settle the differences in opinions about the historical facts relating to the Khojaly events”. This being said, the Court has never made such a decision in connection with the contradictory views or facts and has never included the statement published by Anadolu in his verdict.

Another statement of the verdict reads, “However, apart from this aspect, there appears to be a lack of either clarity or unanimity in respect of certain other aspects and details relating to the Khojaly events. For example, there are conflicting views as to whether a safe escape corridor was provided to the civilians fleeing their town. Likewise, there exist various opinions about the role and responsibility of the Azerbaijani authorities and military forces in these events, with some reports suggesting they could have done more to protect the civilians or that their actions could have somehow contributed to the gravity of the situation. Questions have arisen whether the proper defence of the town had been organized and, if not, whether this was the result of a domestic political struggle in Azerbaijan.

In view of the above Court considers the various matters related to the Khojaly events “to be open to ongoing debate among historians” and “as such should be a matter of general interest in modern Azerbaijani society.

In this regard, the Court noted that a democratic society should tolerate discussion of topics that may be perceived in this society as a war crime or a crime against humanity.

Anadolu agency distorted the content of the decision rendered in the case, tearing out part of the said sentence of the 87th paragraph from the context and presenting it as a “conclusion of the court”. In fact, the Court actually found that the contradictory information related to the Khojaly events did not allow to make a final conclusion and, at the same time, clarified that as an arbiter the solution of such case does not fall into its responsibilities.

ECHR called into question the theses about Khojaly that were spread by Azerbaijan and underlined the uncertainty of the parts that need to be studied, stating: “Rather, the applicant [Fatullayev] was supporting one of the conflicting opinions in the debate concerning the existence of an escape corridor for the refugees and, based on that, expressing the view that some Azerbaijani fighters might have also borne a share of the responsibility for the massacre”. Besides this, the Court also stated that “the role and responsibility of the Azerbaijani authorities in either failing to prevent or contributing to the Khojaly events is the subject of ongoing debate”.

Fatullayev was released on a presidential pardon in 2011 and established Azerbaijan’s Haqqin.az (Azerbaijani version – Virtualaz.org) website which currently serves as a propaganda platform for Aliyev. Fatuallayev’s case is a vivid example of how everyone who speaks or acts against the authorities is treated unless they don’t act the way the Azerbaijani authorities command.

When it comes to the media that carry out anti-Armenian propaganda on behalf of the Azerbaijani authorities – they have constantly faced justified arguments from the Armenian side, and regardless of whether the Turkish or other media sources become another tool for Azerbaijani propaganda, the reality remains the same. In 2012 Ilham Aliyev declared that “Armenians spread all over the world are our main enemies”, approving that anti-Armenian propaganda has become the main policy of present-day Azerbaijan.

Turkish state news agency “Anadolu” distorted the provisions of the verdict related to the Khojaly events. Along with the fake propaganda thesis by Azerbaijan, the article published on February 26 illuminated the official verdict of “Fatullayev vs Azerbaijan” case completely out of the context and obviously distorted.

According to their claims, ECHR stated that “what happened in Khojaly amounts to a war crime or a crime against humanity”. These false claims were later on spread by an Arabic website – Albosala.com.

Fatullayev VS Azerbaijan

In 2007 Azerbaijan’s law enforcement organs opened a criminal case against the editor-in-chief of the “Real Azerbaijan” journal Eynula Fatullayev accusing him of “statements of defamations” related to the Khojaly events. Taken as the basis to launch a criminal case were Fatullayev’s critical articles about the state officials published on the pages of “Real Azerbaijan” as well as the articles containing evidence contradicting the official thesis about the events in Khojaly (ECHR verdict, 1st paragraph). In February 2005, the editor of the journal started his thread of articles under “Karabakh diary” name, summing up his thoughts after his 10-day visit to the Republic of Artsakh.

“I have visited this town [Naftalan] where I have spoken to hundreds (I repeat, hundreds) of refugees who insisted that there had been a corridor and that they had remained alive owing to this corridor … [They were killed] not by [some] mysterious [shooters], but by provocateurs from the NFA battalions … [The corpses] had been mutilated by our own …”(1,2,3).

He was sentenced to a prison term by the Azerbaijani court and appealed the decision of the court in ECHR where the verdict of the court was assessed as an act of violation of Fatullayev’s rights in a number of provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights, ordering the immediate release of the journalist from the Azerbaijani authorities.

ECHR verdict and the Khojaly events

On the 87th paragraph of the official verdict of the ECHR on Khojaly states, “Moreover, the Court notes that it is an integral part of freedom of _expression_ to seek historical truth. At the same time, it is not the Court’s role to arbitrate the underlying historical issues which are part of a continuing debate between historians that shapes opinion as to the events which took place and their interpretation. Court accordingly considers that it is not its task to settle the differences in opinions about the historical facts relating to the Khojaly events”. This being said, the Court has never made such a decision in connection with the contradictory views or facts and has never included the statement published by Anadolu in his verdict.

Another statement of the verdict reads, “However, apart from this aspect, there appears to be a lack of either clarity or unanimity in respect of certain other aspects and details relating to the Khojaly events. For example, there are conflicting views as to whether a safe escape corridor was provided to the civilians fleeing their town. Likewise, there exist various opinions about the role and responsibility of the Azerbaijani authorities and military forces in these events, with some reports suggesting they could have done more to protect the civilians or that their actions could have somehow contributed to the gravity of the situation. Questions have arisen whether the proper defence of the town had been organized and, if not, whether this was the result of a domestic political struggle in Azerbaijan.

In view of the above Court considers the various matters related to the Khojaly events “to be open to ongoing debate among historians” and “as such should be a matter of general interest in modern Azerbaijani society.

In this regard, the Court noted that a democratic society should tolerate discussion of topics that may be perceived in this society as a war crime or a crime against humanity.

Anadolu agency distorted the content of the decision rendered in the case, tearing out part of the said sentence of the 87th paragraph from the context and presenting it as a “conclusion of the court”. In fact, the Court actually found that the contradictory information related to the Khojaly events did not allow to make a final conclusion and, at the same time, clarified that as an arbiter the solution of such case does not fall into its responsibilities.

ECHR called into question the theses about Khojaly that were spread by Azerbaijan and underlined the uncertainty of the parts that need to be studied, stating: “Rather, the applicant [Fatullayev] was supporting one of the conflicting opinions in the debate concerning the existence of an escape corridor for the refugees and, based on that, expressing the view that some Azerbaijani fighters might have also borne a share of the responsibility for the massacre”. Besides this, the Court also stated that “the role and responsibility of the Azerbaijani authorities in either failing to prevent or contributing to the Khojaly events is the subject of ongoing debate”.

Fatullayev was released on a presidential pardon in 2011 and established Azerbaijan’s Haqqin.az (Azerbaijani version – Virtualaz.org) website which currently serves as a propaganda platform for Aliyev. Fatuallayev’s case is a vivid example of how everyone who speaks or acts against the authorities is treated unless they don’t act the way the Azerbaijani authorities command.

When it comes to the media that carry out anti-Armenian propaganda on behalf of the Azerbaijani authorities – they have constantly faced justified arguments from the Armenian side, and regardless of whether the Turkish or other media sources become another tool for Azerbaijani propaganda, the reality remains the same. In 2012 Ilham Aliyev declared that “Armenians spread all over the world are our main enemies”, approving that anti-Armenian propaganda has become the main policy of present-day Azerbaijan.

Vanuhi Karapetyan




Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 05-03-20

Save

Share

 17:43, 5 March, 2020

YEREVAN, 5 MARCH, ARMENPRESS. The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 5 March, USD exchange rate up by 0.48 drams to 479.60 drams. EUR exchange rate up by 1.40 drams to 535.91 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate down by 0.06 drams to 7.23 drams. GBP exchange rate up by 7.33 drams to 619.74 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price вup by 431.23 drams to 25316.5 drams. Silver price вup by 7.05 drams to 265.99 drams. Platinum price вup by 244.60 drams to 13522.9 drams.

French Armenians alarm about links between Paris Mayor candidate and Azerbaijani authorities

Save

Share

 17:44, 5 March, 2020

YEREVAN, MARCH 5, ARMENPRESS. Rachida Dati, nominated as a candidate for Paris Mayor, has close links with Azerbaijani authorities, ARMENPRESS reports Co-chairs of the Coordination Council of Armenian organizations of France Murad Papazian and Ara Toranyan (Editor-in chief of Nouvelles d’Arménie, member of Ile-de-France City Council Patrick Caram raised the concerns in an article published in the online platform called Marianne.

The article notes that Dati is known for her close links with authoritarian and non-democratic Azerbaijani authorities. She has been member of Assembly of the Friends of Azerbaijan, which was thought of as the main tool for Azerbaijan’s “caviar policy” in France.

“Is it worth reminding that Dati, who declares about her support to Baku, was against the investigation in the European Parliament in 2017 into the incidents of exerting illegal pressures against European politicians?”, reads the article.

Rachida Dati’s friendship with Aliyev’s regime was obvious still in 2011, when she organized a huge dinner in honor of 1st Lady of Azerbaijan Mehriban Aliyeva. The candidate of Paris Mayor made announcements against the Armenians living in Nagorno Karabakh (Artsakh) particularly after the April war of 2016.  

The elections of local self-government bodies in France will be held on March 15-22. Incubent Mayor Anne Hidalgo is a favorite.

Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan

Armenia cancels participation in London AI & Big data EXPO due to coronavirus dangers

Save

Share

 17:01, 5 March, 2020

YEREVAN, MARCH 5, ARMENPRESS. The Ministry of High Tech Industry has said that it is cancelling the Armenian delegation’s scheduled participation at the AI & Big data EXPO in London March 17-18 due to risks and dangers associated with the novel coronavirus outbreak.

Meanwhile, the ministry is now discussing the possibility of the Armenian delegation participating in the eponymous expo scheduled for November in Santa Clara, USA.

 

Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan




Artsakh’s President convenes consultation on preventing spread of novel coronavirus

Save

Share

 18:48, 5 March, 2020

YEREVAN, MARCH 5, ARMENPRESS. Artsakh Republic President Bako Sahakyan convened a working consultation on March 5 to discuss issues related to the process of activities aimed at preventing the spread of acute respiratory infections and new coronavirus in the republic, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of Artsakh President’s Office.

The heads of the relevant spheres participating in the consultation delivered corresponding reports on their activities. The situation regarding the measures taken against the coronavirus was analyzed. The members of the Interdepartmental Commission, established in the republic pursuant to the Government resolution, including the public administration bodies, being in constant contact with the relevant structures of the Republic of Armenia, carry out a joint policy in this matter.

The President underscored the necessity of controlling the epidemic situation in the republic and taking all preventive measures. The public should be constantly informed by state authorities about all the specific cases associated with the acute respiratory infections, including the new coronavirus, and this information should always be accessible to citizens. The Head of the State gave appropriate assignments towards carrying out the activities in an organized and coordinated manner, highlighting in this context the need of close cooperation between all the state structures. Artsakh Republic minister of state Grigory Martirosyan, Security Council Secretary Arshavir Gharamyan, and other officials participated in the consultation.

Helping hands bring laser light to Armenia

Harvard Gazette
March 6 2020

Rox Anderson (left) and Lilit Garibyan are leading an ongoing project that provides laser surgery to children in Armenia affected by port-wine stain and hemangioma.

Photos by Jon Chase/Harvard Staff Photographer

hen Lilit Garibyan left her native Armenia in 1991, the Eurasian nation was at war with neighboring Azerbaijan, and Garibyan was a 12-year-old who knew she would go back someday, but, she later decided, not before she had something to offer.

Garibyan returned in 2013, bringing medical expertise and high-tech lasers to the capital, Yerevan. On that first trip, she and the two doctors who accompanied her worked long days treating disfiguring skin conditions, including scarring, the bright-red vascular tumor called hemangioma, and the capillary malformation that results in the discoloration known as port-wine stain.

Garibyan, a Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) dermatologist and assistant professor of dermatology at Harvard Medical School, has since visited annually and worked with U.S. and Armenian partners to secure donated lasers, train local physicians to run them, and establish a nonprofit, Face of Angel, to foster the work.

“It was emotional to go back after being away for 22 years, to see the country you came from. I saw my relatives,” Garibyan said. “I hadn’t gone back because I wanted to go back when I could give something back. I didn’t just want to go say, ‘Hi, I’m Lilit. Nice to see you again.’”

Garibyan, a physician-scientist at MGH’s Wellman Center for Photomedicine, said that the targeted conditions can have serious complications, including blindness when they occur near the eye, cognitive issues if in the brain, or bleeding and functional difficulties in affected body parts, particularly the hand and foot. But, she added, the most common — and often most debilitating — effects are often psychological.

“The psychological impact is huge,” Garibyan said. “Kids don’t want to go outside. They don’t want to interact with others as they feel embarrassed. They’re ostracized because they appear different from others.”

In the U.S., port-wine stains are typically treated with lasers when patients are young, as are hemangiomas when they fail to fade over time, as often occurs. The precision laser treatment, given over the course of several months, can effectively erase them, Garibyan said. In developing and middle-income nations, however, both the sophisticated lasers used to seal off leaky, malformed blood vessels and knowledge of how to run them are scarce. Those barriers to treatment are what Garibyan and a team from the Wellman Center, including the center’s director, Professor of Dermatology R. Rox Anderson — who ran a similar program in Vietnam — seek to clear.

Statistics aren’t available about how widespread the conditions are in Armenia, in part because, without effective treatment, individuals tend to keep to themselves or hide affected skin under clothing, according to Khachanush Hakobyan, executive director of the Armenian American Wellness Center, one of two centers collaborating with the American doctors. Seven years into the program, demand for treatment shows no signs of lessening. The Armenian American Wellness Center — which charges nothing to treat children — is actively reaching out, advertising on Facebook, and appearing on local television programs, and the patients keep coming.

Hovik Stepanyan, an Armenian physician whom the MGH team trained to use the lasers, said the center sees about 20 new patients a month, and the yearly totals have increased to about 220 today and are still rising.

Stepanyan, who has become a local expert in the laser treatment and is consulted widely in the region, said that what has been helpful to him has been not only the initial training, but also the ongoing collaboration, which allows him to send images and consult with the MGH physicians on tricky cases. He’s also traveled to Boston several times for the Harvard continuing medical education laser conferences.

Mary Aloyan, 14, from the village of Gyumri, 160 miles from Yerevan, is about 90 percent through the treatment for port-wine stain on her face. She said the laser procedures can be painful, but not intolerably so, and her parents said the results have been worth it.

“As my child was growing, she was feeling unconfident and ashamed. We decided to apply for laser treatment,” said A. Aloyan, Mary’s father. “We haven’t finished treatment yet, but the results are obvious, and we plan to continue the interventions until my daughter will have a port-wine-stain-free face. My child is more confident and does not concentrate on the port-wine stain on her face. We are happy.”

Aloyan said he’d definitely recommend the treatment for others, as it improves the quality of life for patients and their families.

“As a parent, it’s hard when your daughter goes through all of this, but the results are encouraging,” Aloyan said.

Garibyan is no stranger to family sacrifice. Her parents left Armenia for Glendale, Calif., fearing that her younger brother would be pressed into service amid their nation’s widening war with Azerbaijan. They choose Glendale because of its large Armenian community.

Garibyan arrived at Los Angeles International Airport speaking not a word of English, and she still recalls the confusion and dislocation of her first months in America — especially in the classroom — as she wrestled with a new language. Garibyan’s mother thought their stay would be brief, but months became years, laden with cultural and financial challenges. As Garibyan’s English improved, so did her grades. Against the advice of a high school guidance counselor who thought community college was her best bet, Garibyan applied to the University of California, Los Angeles, and was admitted. She studied science and spent a consequential summer at the University of California at San Francisco lab of Donald Ganem, a Harvard Medical School alumnus who urged her to apply to Harvard’s M.D./Ph.D. program.

Garibyan graduated with a doctorate from Harvard’s Biological and Biomedical Sciences program in 2007, and then earned her M.D. from HMS in 2009. After her residency in dermatology, Garibyan encountered a high school friend, Ray Jalian, who was working as a fellow with Anderson at MGH’s Wellman Center. Drawn by the promise of conducting translational research that could have a direct impact on patients’ lives, Garibyan joined the lab. Now she’s conducting studies on an injectable coolant that she and her team invented and developed in the lab. They intend to use this for removing disease-causing fat tissue in the body and for treating pain. This coolant is able to reduce pain by numbing nerves without resorting to the extreme cold typically used in cryotherapy. Garibyan hopes her discovery will reduce or eliminate the need for opioids to treat pain, thus helping fight the deadly epidemic of drug abuse ravaging the nation.

The Armenia program grew out of Anderson’s earlier efforts in Vietnam, where he and colleagues performed laser surgery for the same vascular problems as in the Armenia program. Garibyan met an Armenian plastic surgeon who was visiting Boston University and who’d spent some time at Anderson’s lab. After seeing their work, he urged them to bring their expertise with laser surgery for vascular abnormalities to Armenia.

“Rox said, ‘OK, let’s go,’” Garibyan said. “I was like, ‘What? I have to ask my boss.’ He said, ‘I am your boss.’ So I said, ‘Yes, we should go.’”

“There were people who felt that they couldn’t work or face anybody with this problem. It’s a real social concern. One of them found out I was the one who sent the laser, and she started crying. It was such an easy thing. You do these treatments, and the results are so amazing.”
— Christine Avakoff, dermatologist

That first trip, in 2013, coincided with a plastic surgery conference in the capital, and included Garibyan, Anderson, and Jalian. They brought a borrowed laser and focused on treating scars, port-wine stains, and hemangiomas.

“The first day we saw over 70 consultations. There were so many people wanting to be seen for scars and vascular anomalies,” Garibyan said. “We had to use our creativity and imagination. We were only given the dentist’s room to work out of, so we divided the room into three sections: pre-op, treatment, and post-op.”

In addition to consulting with patients and treating those they could, they also taught local physicians to use the lasers and gave lectures at the plastic surgery conference.

“I was really happy because I had now created something where I could meaningfully give back,” Garibyan said. “We decided that we will do this every year, and we could make it into the same program that the Vietnam project had become.”

The program benefited early on from the involvement of California dermatologist Christine Avakoff and her husband, physician John Poochigian, who have traveled regularly to Armenia since 2000. It was Avakoff who introduced Garibyan to the Armenian American Wellness Center, which, along with Arabkir Hospital, has become one of the collaboration’s primary sites in Armenia. Avakoff, who was retiring, donated the first laser to the center — six have been donated so far, with the major donors being the Candela and Quanta laser companies. Garibyan also worked with Avakoff and Poochigian to establish Face of Angel to support the work there.

Avakoff and Poochigian are of Armenian ancestry and were struck on their travels by the number of people with visible vascular abnormalities that are relatively easily treated in the U.S. Avakoff said she recalled one boy who had a port-wine stain on his feet, which bled when he walked. Others had gone blind because the condition had been untreated, while still others had suffered disfiguring surgeries using 1970s-era lasers, Avakoff said.

While Garibyan is planning a trip with several colleagues to Yerevan this spring, word is spreading about the program and its predecessor in Vietnam. Avakoff said the program has begun to draw patients from neighboring countries, including Russia. A lawmaker in Montenegro heard about the program through one of the participating physicians and asked whether they’d bring it there.

“We might go there for a few days on the way back from Armenia, do an assessment, and see what they need,” Garibyan said.

Armenia Parliament approves reform for education in schools

News.am, Armenia
March 6 2020

23:12, 06.03.2020
                  

Today, in the second and final reading, the National Assembly of Armenia unanimously voted in favor of the package of bills on making amendments and supplements to the law on public education and related laws, reports Armenian News-NEWS.am’s correspondent.

As Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sport of Armenia Arayik Harutyunyan stated, the bill forms a part of the reforms in the education system that are aimed at introducing the distance learning system.

The minister stated several issues in the public education system, including the lack of specialists and the distance between schools in villages which causes problems with attendance.

Another innovation is the introduction of a credit system that will apply to 10th-12th graders and envisages assessment of knowledge through credits. The bill also envisages the creation of Student Councils in schools.