CIVILNET.End of an era: Bangladesh’s last Armenian dies

CIVILNET.AM

09:02

The article was originally published on the Bangkokpost.com

DHAKA – Michael Joseph Martin, Bangladesh’s last Armenian, has died aged 89, bringing an end to the more than 300-year presence of the once thriving and powerful minority Christian community. 

Martin spent decades as custodian of the Armenian Church of the Holy Resurrection which was founded in 1781 in what was once the heart of the Armenian community in Dhaka.

Armen Arslanian, the church’s warden who is based abroad, said Martin “was instrumental in maintaining the survival of the Armenian Church in Dhaka.

 “Without the many personal sacrifices and complete devotion to the church, the premises and the history of the Armenians in Dhaka would not have survived today,” he added as he announced Martin had died on April 11.

The Bangladeshi capital was once home to hundreds of Armenians who first arrived in the 16th century and became major traders, lawyers and public officials in the city.

Martin came to Dhaka in 1942 following in the footsteps of his father who had settled in the region decades earlier. He was originally a trader.

Martin — whose Armenian name was Mikel Housep Martirossian — went on to look after the church and its graveyard where 400 people are buried, including his wife who died in 2006.

When their children left the country, Martin became the sole remaining Armenian in Dhaka and lived alone in a mansion in the church grounds.

“When I walk, sometimes I feel spirits moving around. These are the spirits of my ancestors. They were noble men and women, now resting in peace,” Martin told AFP in an interview published in January 2009.

– Palatial homes –

The marble tombstones he tended display family names such as Sarkies, Manook and Aratoon from a time when Armenians were Dhaka’s wealthiest merchants with palatial homes who traded jute, spices, indigo and leather.

“The earliest surviving Armenian tombstone is that of Khojah Avietes Lazar who died in Dhaka on June 7, 1714, this makes the known Armenian presence in Bangladesh to be over 300 years, similar to that of the community in Kolkata,” Liz Chater, who did extensive research on the Armenian presence in South Asia, told AFP.

Martin had said the Armenians, persecuted elsewhere, were embraced in what is now Bangladesh first by the Mughals in the 16th and 17th centuries and then by the British Empire.

“Their numbers fluctuated with the prospects in trading in Dhaka,” Muntasir Mamun, a historian at Dhaka University, told AFP in 2009.

But they dominated business. “They were the who’s who in town. They celebrated all their religious festivals with pomp and style,” he said.

The decline came after the British left India and the subcontinent was partitioned in 1947 with Dhaka becoming the capital of East Pakistan and then Bangladesh after it gained independence in 1971.

In his last years Martin worried about who would take over as the church caretaker after his death.

“This is a blessed place and God won’t leave it unprotected and uncared for,” Martin said.

“When I die, maybe one of my three daughters will fly in from Canada to keep our presence here alive,” Martin said, speaking broken Bengali with a thick accent.

“Or perhaps other Armenians will come from somewhere else.”

The present warden of the Armenian Church visits Bangladesh every two to three months.

CIVILNET.Armenia Ratifies Lanzarote Convention Amid International Pressure, Angering Far Right and Opposition Groups

CIVILNET.AM

09:37

By Mark Dovich

On May 11, Armenia’s National Assembly voted to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse. More commonly known as the Lanzarote Convention, it is the first international treaty that addresses child abuse within the home and requires state parties to take specific measures to protect minors from sexual abuse.

The Armenian government, then led by President Serzh Sargsyan, signed the Lanzarote Convention in 2010, but failed to ratify it. Before the National Assembly’s vote this week, Armenia and Ireland were the only two Council of Europe member states—out of a total of 47 countries—that had not ratified the treaty. In addition, all three of Armenia’s neighbors that belong to the organization had already ratified the convention: Turkey in 2011, Georgia in 2014, and Azerbaijan in 2019.

The National Assembly voted 79-12 in favor of the convention’s ratification, with several representatives of the ruling My Step alliance abstaining. These abstentions are likely a reflection of fierce opposition to the treaty by Armenia’s emerging far right groups, whose members were seen protesting outside the legislature as the vote was called.

In 2018, Armenia’s Investigative Committee opened 76 criminal cases involving sexual violence against children, while the country’s police force reported 50 cases in the same period. This discrepancy has arisen because Armenia does not have a single, unified system for reporting sexual assault. Compounding issues involving this lack of reliable data, sexual assault cases in Armenia often go unreported due to strong cultural taboos that frequently involve the blaming and shaming of victims. As a result, the number of reported cases is almost certainly lower than the number of assaults actually committed.

Receiving messages of support from the influential Armenian Apostolic Church, and gaining significant exposure on media platforms controlled by figures connected with the prerevolutionary government, Armenia’s far right groups have become well-known for criticizing Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan through xenophobic, antifeminist, and homophobic rhetoric.

These activities mirror the ongoing smear campaign against Pashinyan’s administration organized by media groups associated with controversial businessman Mikayel Minasyan, son-in-law of former President Serzh Sargsyan and former ambassador of Armenia to the Vatican. Last month, Armenia’s National Security Service announced indictments against Minasyan on charges of illegal enrichment and money laundering, which Minasyan, who now lives abroad, has denied.

In the case of the Lanzarote Convention, Pashinyan’s critics have leveled charges that the treaty’s ratification undermines the traditional family unit and imposes ‘alien values’ on Armenia. By suggesting that Pashinyan is ‘betraying national values’, these groups attempt to discredit his entire administration—manipulating divisive issues in Armenia’s ongoing culture wars to their own political benefit.

In response, Olya Azatyan, a prominent Armenian civil society activist, denounced the far right groups and opposition media platforms which have come out against the convention’s ratification.

Meanwhile, Arman Tatoyan, Armenia’s Human Rights Defender, placed blame squarely on the government itself, which he says failed to “ensure proper public awareness” of the convention’s purpose, contents, and goals.

The anti-Pashinyan opposition’s response to the Lanzarote Convention’s ratification will remind any Armenia watcher of the controversy that erupted last year after the country’s authorities announced their intent to ratify the Istanbul Convention, another Council of Europe treaty. Known officially as the Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence, the treaty legally defines violence against women and requires state parties to take specific measures to combat gender-based violence.

The parallels are numerous: both treaties were signed, but not ratified by the Armenian government prior to the 2018 Velvet Revolution; both treaties address human rights issues involving the family unit; and both treaties have become lightning rods for government criticism by far right groups and opposition media platforms. It may be precisely for that reason that the previous government avoided bringing the issue before the legislature.

As of this writing, Armenia’s National Assembly has yet to ratify the Istanbul Convention. Armenia’s neighbors Turkey and Georgia have already ratified the convention, while Azerbaijan has neither signed nor ratified it.

Though it remains unclear why Armenia’s government chose to ratify the Lanzarote Convention now, the move does come amid mounting pressure by international organizations on the post-Velvet Revolution government to ratify long-stalled treaties.

In fact, since 2018, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Dunja Mijatovic, has repeatedly called on the Armenian government to ratify both the Lanzarote and the Istanbul Conventions, amid other recommendations. Mijatovic reiterated those points during a visit to Armenia that September. The Council of Europe expects all member countries to rigorously support basic human rights, even if that means giving the state the right to intervene if there is evidence of crimes committed within the family unit.

Additionally, the Council of Europe announced last year that it selected Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Ukraine as pilot countries for a program that seeks to combat online sexual exploitation of children in the Caucasus, Southeastern Europe, Turkey, and Ukraine. It is not clear why the Council of Europe selected these particular countries as pilots for the program.

In light of this pressure, the Armenian government issued a pledge to the UN Human Rights Office in 2019, exactly 30 years after it acceded to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, that it would undertake the “necessary measures for the ratification of the” Lanzarote Convention.

Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 12-05-20

Save

Share

 17:47,

YEREVAN, 12 MAY, ARMENPRESS. The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 12 May, USD exchange rate up by 1.13 drams to 487.15 drams. EUR exchange rate up by 0.84 drams to 527.05 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate up by 0.04 drams to 6.63 drams. GBP exchange rate down by 0.45 drams to 600.56 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price up by 41.55 drams to 26668.87 drams. Silver price up by 7.82 drams to 241.9 drams. Platinum price up by 11.87 drams to 11856.31 drams.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov infected with coronavirus

Save

Share

 17:01,

YEREVAN, MAY 12, ARMENPRESS. Russian presidential spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has been infected with the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), he personally confirmed the news, reports TASS.

“Yes, I have fallen ill”, he said, answering a corresponding question. “I am receiving treatment”.

Peskov informed TASS that he had seen Russian President Vladimir Putin in person for the last time over a month ago.

“Over a month [ago]”, the spokesman said, answering a question on when he last saw Putin in person.

Erdogan called the Armenian lobby an evil that Turkey intends to confront

Arminfo, Armenia

ArmInfo.Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in his address by TV following a meeting of the country’s Cabinet of Ministers announced the actions of the  authorities to counter the consequences of the new type of  coronavirus pandemic.

In his speech, the Turkish leader also touched upon attempts at  economic and other pressure on Turkey. According to him, Ankara is  “well aware of the insidious goals behind the” traps “for the economy  of the country.

“We will continue to reflect threats and aggression directed against  our borders. Terrorist organizations hostile to Turkey’s forces will  be defeated in their lairs. Turkey will fully defend its interests in  the Mediterranean, Cyprus and the Aegean. We will not give up before  the forces of evil, either FETO, the RKK, the Armenian and Greek  lobbies, or centers of hostility in the Persian Gulf, ” Anadolu cites  the Turkish leader  as saying.

A protest against Lanzarote Convention going on in front of President`s residence

Arminfo, Armenia

ArmInfo.In Yerevan, a protest rally against the Lanzarote Convention is going on in front of the residence of the President of the Republic of Armenia.  Participants  of the rally demand that President Armen Sarkissian not sign the  relevant document, stating that this Convention contradicts national  values. In addition, dissatisfaction is also voiced with the fact  that the Convention implies the use of a number of mechanisms in the  educational sector , which, according to the protesters, may lead to  an teaching the basics of sexual education in schools. 

To note, the protest is small in number quantity, and at the moment  there are more law enforcement officers than the protesters  themselves.

To recall, on May 11, the Armenian parliament approved a bill on  ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of  Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse signed in  Lanzarote. The CE Convention was adopted on October 25, 2007, and  entered into force on July 1, 2010. It is signed by 47 countries and  has entered into force in 45 states. The Republic of Armenia signed  the Convention on September 29, 2010. The Convention, setting common  standards and definitions applicable in all European countries, is  designed to protect children from sexual exploitation and use. The  objectives of the convention are the prevention and combating of  sexual exploitation of children and sexual violence, the protection  of the rights of children affected by sexual crimes, and the  promotion of domestic and international cooperation in combating  sexual exploitation and sexual violence against children.

By ratifying this Convention, the Republic of Armenia undertakes to  take the necessary legislative or other measures to prevent all forms  of sexual exploitation and use of children, as well as protect  children, including the development and implementation of appropriate  mechanisms, especially in the fields of education, health care,  social services, as well as in law enforcement and judicial  authorities. Cooperation between the States Parties to the Convention  will be carried out with the aim of preventing and combating the  sexual exploitation and abuse of children, protecting and assisting  victims of violence, conducting investigations and proceedings  provided for in the Convention.

Thus, ratification of the Convention will create an opportunity to  introduce relevant legislative amendments to the Republic of Armenia  aimed at combating the sexual exploitation of children and sexual  violence, protecting the rights of children affected by sexual  exploitation and sexual abuse. Moreover, the ratification of the  Convention will promote priority attention to ensuring the best  interests of the child in all actions regarding children, and  stimulate international cooperation between the parties to the  Convention. 


Arman Tatoyan to Vagharshak Hakobyan: Don`t you ever threaten the Ombudsman of Armenia!

Arminfo, Armenia

ArmInfo.The next scandal with the participation of MP from the “My Step” bloc Vagharshak Hakobyan and Armenian Ombudsman Arman Tatoyan nearly flared up in the Armenian parliament. The parliamentary correspondent of ArmInfo reported this.   It all started with the fact that Hakobyan began to criticize the  report of the Ombudsman. In particular, the MP did not like the fact  that the Ombudsman devoted little attention to the rights of women in  the report. 

Then the latter began to develop his thought and indicate to the  Ombudsman what he should have indicated in his report what could be  omitted and what should be given special attention.  In turn, Arman  Tatoyan noted that no one has the right to talk with the Ombudsman of  Armenia from a position of power. , the  Ombudsman concluded. 

Armenia. From fists and swearing to systemic politics

Arminfo, Armenia

ArmInfo.On May 11, after being signed by the President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian, the law “On Confiscation of Illegally Acquired Property” entered into force. From  now on, any incumbent or former government official, who failed to  prove the lawfulness of the acquired property worth over 50 million  drams, is deprived of it by a court decision. Meanwhile, earlier law  enforcement officers had to prove the lawfulness of the property  acquired by state officials.

This event, by and large, is the main news of recent weeks. Even  though it was expected, it sidelined the most publicly discussed  street and parliamentary fights of the Armenian lawmakers. It was  this law that became the root cause of the inappropriate behavior of  the “adequate” hooligans and the dense behavior of “bright”  politicians. In fact, it was a rather provocative behavior, bait,  which the representatives of the “stepping” majority so recklessly  took, up to the level of the deputy speaker of the parliament. And  the leadership of the ruling party itself, judging by the statements  of individual lawmakers, the head of the parliamentary faction Lilit  Makunts and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan himself, is well aware of  the essence of the situation.

This is evidenced by the lightning-fast signing by the president of  the law “On the confiscation of illegally acquired property” after a  fight in parliament and the accompanying wave of fists. Meanwhile,  before that, Armen Sarkissian, was not in particular hurry to sign  it, observing all the terms and procedural framework necessary in  such cases. It was the entry into force of the law that became the  most painful and therefore the best response of the authorities to  the ”willy-nilly” brawlers and most importantly to the ”patrons”  of fistfights. It was a response to ”son-in-law” Mikael Minasyan  (the latter’s most popular title). It was a response to his  father-in-law – former president Serzh Sargsyan, a response to the  environment of another former president Robert Kocharian. A response  to dozens of robbers of state assets of the republican scale, a  response to hundreds of lower-level robbers. It is clear that the law  was developed and adopted by no means with the aim of confiscating  from small election fraudsters of garages and ugly booths built in  the “green zones”. And not even the mansions of the “republican”  bureaucrats who gave permits for illegal construction to their  “stooges” for their loyal service. The law was adopted in relation to  specific individuals, several dozen families that have appropriated  the national wealth of the Armenian people over the past two decades.

In this light, it is noteworthy that the accelerated implementation  of the Judicial and Legal Reform (Vetting) Strategy for 2019-2023  adopted in 2019, follows the law “On Confiscation of Illegally  Acquired Property”. Very briefly, the essence of the vetting is to  clean up the judges who still continue to work, protecting the  “formers” from fair punishment and to replace them with young judges  who are ready, , to take verdicts in cases relating to the  confiscation of looted state property.

According to Prosecutor General Artur Davtyan, in the recent decade  alone, the turnover of illegal economic activity in Armenia amounted  to hundreds of millions of dollars. Moreover, all these cases under  investigation are interconnected, and unprecedented in scope. Illegal  business was carried out through hundreds of formal business  entities, however, it was coordinated from one or two centers. So  far, only certain parts of this complex of cases have been published  regarding Mikael Minasyan and Gagik Khachatryan.

The state apparatus, in particular its force sector, acts extremely  slowly and indecisively. The main reason is the affiliation of a  number of “agents”, investigators, judges, why not, the heads of  departments with people, whom they have to dispossess and put in  jail. The last manifestation of this unpleasant phenomenon was the  escape of the actual owner of Ucom Gurgen Khachatryan from the  investigation. The son of the former super minister Gagik Khachatryan  became aware of the change of the measure of restraint against him to  arrest long before it was announced. The hastened appointment of  Argishti Kharamyan as deputy director of the National Security  Service testified that the authorities are aware of such a situation.  The compelled reason for the appointment of a 29-year-old  non-systemic worker to this post is obvious: Prime Minister Pashinyan  simply does not trust the director of the National Security Service  Eduard Martirosyan, recently appointed by him. It is clear that under  such conditions, radical reform + shake-up of personnel in the NSS,  the Police, the Prosecutor General’s Office, the Special  Investigation Service, and all other “bodies” is a necessity. Without  this, there will simply be no one to implement the law “On  Confiscation of Illegally Acquired Property”. 

Nevertheless, we see that, the law enforcement system urged on by the  prime minister, who, in turn, is urged by the society, with the  support of parliament, nevertheless grabbed the criminal corruption  octopus by the ends of its limbs. And the octopus immediately began  to move all the limbs it had: all those Danielyans, Marukyans and  other servants of the former comprador regime, which is slowly but  surely transforming into the fifth column. There is no point in  responding to this demagoguery, hysterical cries of this entire hired  public, let alone beating them. This will only lead in the future to  the transformation of an empty space into a political factor. Prime  Minister Pashinyan’s attempts to justify the broken nose of an  adequate (member of the Adequate movement) and slam to the  ”political corpse” with “psychological pressure” on the authorities  are completely meaningless.

“My step”, especially Pashinyan, should have been prepared for such  provocations and pressure, respectively, they just do not deserve  justification for the weakness shown. Any in-depth reforms are always  paid for by the loss of popularity of those who carry them out. Given  the specifics of the Armenian realities, young reformers need to be  prepared not only to lose the rating, but also to similar theatrical  performances. The only alternative is the surrender of power to the  “formers”, the methods of which against predecessor successors will  be far from being velvet.

In this light, the main thing for the authorities is to continue to  go all the way along the planned path. To go steadily,  systematically, not paying attention to debris lying under their feet  and even biting. In the end, the authorities simply have no other  choice. Deprivation of the robbers of the loot is the landmark and,  accordingly, the last possibility of revenge has been obviously  chosen correctly. Along the way, it is necessary to take total  control of all major financial flows in the country, from the  country, and even into the country. The activities of the Tsarukians,  Aleksanyans, and other oligarchs newly-reincarnated into businessmen  should be taken under the control of, the regulator at least. It is  necessary to adopt and implement several more initiatives and laws,  including, of course, the reform of the Constitution. If this task is  finally formed, or even achieved, all these ”bright adequates” will  automatically sink into the swamp, as quickly as they emerged from  there. And finally, new people, new political forces, new ideas, a  new opposition to the authorities, and accordingly, a new future for  Armenia will take the place of ”Marukyans”.  After all, in the 21st  century, the technologies are the one to make politics and not  obscene and slap-blows.  The ruling majority bears full  responsibility for the transition from fists and swearing to  systemic, fundamental, institutional policies and the consequences of  the absence of this transition. And it is time for the ruling  majority and, of course, the “face” of the authorities- Prime  Minister Pashinyan to realize this. 

MFA: Artsakh Republic confirms its commitment to exclusively peaceful settlement of the Karabakh conflict

Arminfo, Armenia

ArmInfo. The ceasefire is the only tangible achievement in the process of resolving the  Azerbaijani-Karabakh conflict, which was the result of full-fledged  trilateral negotiations with the direct and full participation of one  of its main parties, the Republic of Artsakh. This is stated in the  comment of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh  in connection with the 26th anniversary of the entry into force of  the Agreement on the cessation of hostilities.

As noted in the commentary, the path to an indefinite truce was not  easy. Previous attempts to put an end to the war were frustrated due  to the position of Azerbaijan, which, being confident in its  military-technical superiority, hoped for a forceful solution of the  conflict. Diplomatic success became possible only after the Artsakh  Defense Army repelled the armed aggression of Azerbaijan and ensured  the safe borders of the republic and thereby seriously undermined the  potential of Baku, aimed at resolving the conflict through military  force.

Another obstacle to the agreement on the establishment of an  indefinite truce was the unwillingness of Azerbaijan to conduct  direct negotiations with the Republic of Artsakh. However, after a  significant weakening of its military potential, the Azerbaijani  leadership not only ceased to hinder the full involvement of official  Stepanakert in the negotiation process, but also repeatedly initiated  direct contacts with the Artsakh authorities, including at the  highest level. Removing the main obstacle to direct negotiations  allowed us to concentrate on substantive issues and thereby lay the  foundation for subsequent diplomatic success – the establishment of  an unlimited ceasefire and military operations.

, the comment says. 

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 05/12/2020

                                        Tuesday, 
Armenian President Signs Bill On Asset Seizures
Armenia -- President Armen Sarkissian (R) and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
attend a conference in Dilijan, June 8, 2019.
President Armen Sarkissian has signed into law a controversial government bill 
allowing the confiscation of private properties and other assets deemed to have 
been acquired illegally, while warning against its “unscrupulous enforcement” by 
the authorities.
The bill passed by the Armenian parliament last month allows prosecutors to 
investigate individuals in case of having “sufficient grounds to suspect” that 
the market value of their assets exceeds their “legal incomes” by at least 50 
million drams ($103,000). Should the prosecutors find such discrepancies they 
can ask courts to nationalize those assets even if their owners are not found 
guilty of corruption or other criminal offenses.
The latter will have to prove the legality of their holdings if they are to 
retain them. They will also be given the option of reaching an out-of-court 
settlement with the prosecutors, which would require them to hand over at least 
75 percent of their assets in and outside Armenia to the state.
The government says that current and former state officials facing corruption 
charges will be the main targets of the legal mechanism for asset forfeiture. 
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian has repeatedly portrayed it as a major 
anti-corruption measure that will help the authorities recover “wealth stolen 
from the people.” Pashinian has indicated in recent weeks his intention to use 
it against the country’s former rulers and their cronies repeatedly branded by 
him as “plunderers.”
The two opposition parties represented in the parliament have backed the bill in 
principle while proposing various amendments to it and voicing other 
reservations.
But other, more hardline opposition groups and figures have condemned the bill 
as unconstitutional and accused Pashinian of planning a far-reaching 
“redistribution of assets” to cement his hold on power. They claim that this 
will only discourage Armenian and foreign entrepreneurs from investing in the 
country.
Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigorian likewise warned that the bill could scare 
away investors and lead to capital flight from Armenia when the government 
discussed and approved it in December.
Some of the critics, among them supporters of the former government, urged 
Sarkissian last month to ask the Constitutional Court to rule on the bill’s 
conformity with the Armenian constitution.
The president decided to sign the bill into law, however. In a lengthy 
explanatory note released on Monday, his office said that “numerous” Armenian 
non-governmental organizations, legal experts and even foreign investors have 
voiced concern over the legislation and its possible negative impact on the 
domestic business environment. It said the presidential administration has 
discussed those concerns with Justice Minister Rustam Badasian and received 
“clarifications” from him.
“The president of the republic attaches great importance to the fight against 
crime,” read the statement. “At the same time, it is expected that the law must 
be implemented in strict conformity with the legitimate aim of its passage.”
“An unscrupulous enforcement of the law could undermine trust in the state and 
jeopardize its effectiveness,” it said.
Sarkissian’s office specifically warned the authorities against arbitrarily 
accessing and using citizens’ personal data, breaching bank secrecy or hampering 
business activity and competition.
The statement did not clearly explain why Sarkissian chose not to request a 
Constitutional Court judgment on the legality of asset seizures sought by the 
government.
Meanwhile, Pashinian met with Badasian later on Monday to discuss practical 
modalities of the law’s implementation. The justice minister, who is the main 
author of the legislation, confirmed that the process will be handled by a new 
division that will be set up within the Office of the Prosecutor-General in the 
coming months.
Kocharian Has Another Operation
Armenia -- Former President Robert Kocharian is brought to a courtroom in 
Yerevan, May 8, 2020.
Armenia’s jailed former President Robert Kocharian underwent surgery on Tuesday 
for the second time in seven months.
Kocharian’s office said that the operation went according to plan and that he is 
now in a “satisfactory” condition. It did not reveal the medical condition he 
suffered from.
Kocharian, who is standing trial on corruption and coup charges strongly denied 
by him, was already operated on at Yerevan’s Izmirlian Medical Center in 
October. He was again the taken to the private hospital on April 28 for what one 
of his lawyers described as a “post-operative checkup.”
Earlier this spring, Kocharian spent more than three weeks in another hospital 
after complaining of blood pressure fluctuations. He was sent back to prison on 
April 3.
Kocharian’s lawyers have since repeatedly demanded his release from custody on 
health grounds, saying that he risks being infected with coronavirus. They say 
that 65-year-old is in a COVID-19 high-risk group because of his age and health 
problems.
The lawyers reiterated their demands on Friday when a Yerevan court resumed the 
high-profile trial of Kocharian and three other former officials prosecuted on 
charges mostly stemming from the 2008 post-election unrest in the Armenian 
capital.
Three former Armenian prime ministers also attended the court hearing to ask the 
presiding judge, Anna Danibekian, to free Kocharian pending the outcome of the 
trial. Danibekian is scheduled to respond to these petitions on Wednesday.
Kocharian rejects all charges leveled against him as politically motivated.
Government Won’t Rule Out Renewed Coronavirus Restrictions
        • Robert Zargarian
Armenia -- A COVID-19 patient and a medic at the intensive care unit of Surp 
Grigor Lusavorich hospital, Yerevan, . (A photo by the Armenian 
Mnistry of Health)
The government could re-impose restrictions on people’s movements if coronavirus 
cases continue to spread in Armenia, a senior official said on Tuesday.
“We may again tighten restrictions if need be,” Vahan Hunanian, a spokesman for 
Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinian, told RFE/RL’s Armenian service.
Hunanian said that the government has still not decided whether to extend a 
coronavirus-related state of emergency which ends on Thursday. “When a final 
decision is made we will announce it,” he added.
The government declared the state of emergency on March 16 and imposed a 
nationwide lockdown a few days later in a bid to contain the coronavirus 
epidemic. It began easing the resulting restrictions already on April 13.
The lockdown was largely lifted by May 4 despite increased daily numbers of new 
COVID-19 infections and Health Minister Arsen Torosian’s warnings that the 
authorities will soon be unable to hospitalize or isolate all infected people.
The Armenian Ministry of Health reported 146 coronavirus cases on Tuesday 
morning, raising the country’s total to 3,538. It also said that one more person 
died from the virus in the past 24 hours. The official death toll from the 
epidemic thus reached 47.
The ministry has also reported the deaths of 19 other individuals infected with 
the COVID-19. It claims that they died as a result of other, pre-existing 
conditions.
Hasmik Ghazinian, an epidemiologist, said that the number of cases and 
fatalities is continuing to rise rapidly because the lockdown restrictions were 
not strict enough and were not taken seriously by many Armenians. “The 
restrictions that were put in place were not really restrictions,” she said.
Some restrictions such as a ban on public transport and the closure of schools 
and universities remain in force. Also, supermarkets, other shops and small 
businesses must require customers to wear face masks and gloves. Many of them do 
not comply with this requirement.
Ghazinian suggested that supermarkets’ failure to enforce social distancing and 
hygiene rules is one of the main causes of the continuing spread of the virus.
Opposition Party Boycotts Armenian Parliament After Violence
        • Tatevik Lazarian
Armenia -- Empty seats of deputies from the opposition Bright Armenia Party 
boycotting sessions of parliament, Yerevan, .
Deputies representing the opposition Bright Armenia Party (LHK) continued to 
boycott on Tuesday sessions of the parliament in protest against the violent 
conduct of their pro-government colleagues which they say is encouraged by Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian.
They walked out of the National Assembly last Friday following a brawl involving 
LHK leader Edmon Marukian and several deputies from Pashinian’s My Step bloc. 
One of those lawmakers, Sasun Mikaelian, punched Marukian while the latter spoke 
on the parliament in the presence of Pashinian and government ministers.
Pashinian deplored the violence but effectively blamed it on the LHK. Marukian’s 
party charged in response that he thereby “justified, legitimized and 
encouraged” violence against his political opponents. It also demanded the 
resignation of Mikaelian and two other My Step deputies who also hit Marukian 
during the fight.
The ruling bloc responded by saying that they will resign from the parliament 
only if Marukian and two other LHK deputies quit too.
Marukian shrugged off the proposal in a video address livestreamed on Facebook 
overnight. He claimed that Pashinian wants to get rid of his “last opponents” in 
the parliament.
“Why should we hand our mandates?” said Marukian. “Who did we punch? Sasun 
Mikaelian must definitely give up his mandate because he has nothing to do with 
politics.”
“We are victims of violence whereas you are its perpetrators and initiators,” he 
added, appealing to the ruling bloc.
“They are not victims, they are a party to the conflict,” countered Lilit 
Makunts, the bloc’s parliamentary leader.
“I am calling on my esteemed colleague to return to the political field and to 
put the work of the National Assembly back on a substantive track,” she told 
reporters.
Makunts also said that My Step has “drawn our conclusions” from the ugly 
incident and expects the same from the opposition party.
None of the 17 deputies representing the LHK showed up for Tuesday’s session of 
the 132-member parliament. The boycott led speaker Ararat Mirzoyan to postpone a 
planned debate on two LHK bills by two months.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.