Category: 2020
"Media Advocate" initiative issues statement against Armenia PM Chief of Staff’s insulting remarks
The “Media Advocate” initiative has issued the following statement regarding the insulting remarks that Chief of Staff of the Prime Minister of Armenia Eduard Aghajanyan made in regard to media outlets on his Facebook page:
“Eduard Aghajanyan, the Chief of Staff of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, made insulting remarks regarding media outlets on his Facebook page, going beyond borders of politeness.
“Media Advocate” initiative considers such behavior of the state official and the chosen formulations unacceptable. Each individual has the right to demand a denying statement, each state official may deny the article written about him, but it does not mean that he or she may allow himself/herself to insult and label the work of the news outlet.
“Media Advocate” initiative urges Eduard Aghajanyan not to go beyond the limits of politeness and to behave in a manner typical of a high-ranking state official.”
Media Advocate slams Eduard Aghajanyan’s ‘insulting’ remarks on media outlets
Media Advocate initiative strongly condemns the “offensive” Facebook post of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s Chief of Staff Eduard Aghajanyan regarding media outlets. A statement issued by the initiative reads:
“Eduard Aghajanyan, the Chief of Staff of the Armenian Prime Minister, made insulting remarks regarding media outlets on his Facebook page, going beyond the boundaries of politeness.
Media Advocate initiative considers such behavior of the state official and the chosen wordings unacceptable. Each individual has the right to demand a denying statement, each state official may deny the article written about him, but it does not mean that he or she may allow himself/herself to insult and label the work of the news outlet.
Media Advocate initiative urges Eduard Aghajanyan not to go beyond the limits of politeness and to behave in a manner typical of a high-ranking state official.”
Vesti.ru: ECHR opinion favors ex-Armenian President Robert Kocharyan
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has responded to the complaints filed by former Armenian President Robert Kocharyan’s lawyers. The court found that the legislation has undergone changes, while the authorities seek to try Kocharyan under a stricter article, which has been introduced much later, deeming the process as “unacceptable”, Russian media outlet Vesti.ru reported.
The media outlet reminds that Kocharyan was initially arrested in July 2018 on charges of “overthrowing the constitutional order” while dispersing the 2008 post-election protests.
The ex-president was freed in May 2019 to be arrested again in June as the Court of Appeals overturned the lower court ruling.
Kocharyan dismisses the charges as “fabricated and politically motivated”.
Currently the former Armenian president is recovering from a surgery at a Yerevan hospital.
CIVILNET.A Talk with Paolo Spantigati, Director of the ADB in Armenia
CIVILNET.Spread of Coronavirus-Related Misinformation in Armenia Underscores Ongoing Problems with Media Regulation
By Mark Dovich
As the world grapples with the ongoing spread of the novel coronavirus, it also faces a parallel surge in misinformation, fake news, and conspiracies theories about the virus. In recent months, the Chinese, Russian, and U.S. governments have openly promoted coronavirus-related conspiracy theories for political gain. Meanwhile, the proliferation of fake news about the disease continues to accelerate on social media networks and other platforms.
Armenia has been far from immune to these developments. At present the country faces not only an ongoing public health emergency and an economic crisis, but also a flood of fake news and a rise in far right activity, both of which predate the appearance of the disease in the country earlier this year. Together these factors have created fertile ground for coronavirus-related conspiracy theories to take root in Armenia.
These fake news stories and conspiracy theories come from numerous sources. Aside from social media posts by ordinary citizens, coronavirus-related misinformation in Armenia has been linked to media organizations and civil society groups associated with the country’s prerevolutionary political elite, the Russian government, and the U.S. government.
Though numerous fake news stories about the virus have proliferated in Armenia, several have become quite widespread. One line of thought, for instance, holds that every Armenian man is “healthy and strong” and is therefore immune to the coronavirus, ignoring longstanding health issues among this segment of the population, including obesity and high smoking rates.
Other conspiracy theories target the government for alleged wrongdoing and cover-ups. One news story inaccurately claims that the Armenian government is actually paying citizens to contract the coronavirus—ostensibly in an effort to inflate the number of reported cases and thereby attract more international aid. A similar conspiracy theory alleges that the Armenian government has been offering money to relatives of the deceased if they report their loved ones’ cause of death as coronavirus—again, supposedly, to raise more aid.
The state-run National Center for Disease Control (NCDC) has also emerged as a frequent target for misinformation in Armenia. Numerous articles published in recent weeks falsely suggest that the coronavirus is a man-made biological weapon that was accidentally or purposefully disseminated in Armenia through NCDC facilities.
The claims leveled against Armenia’s NCDC, which have appeared primarily in Russian government-linked media platforms, echo similar allegations long made by the Kremlin that the Richard Lugar Center for Public Health Research, a U.S. government-funded laboratory in Tbilisi, serves as a base in Georgia for the U.S. to launch biological weapons at Russia.
Coronavirus-related misinformation has even been promoted by Armenian government officials themselves. In one noteworthy case, Armenian Health Minister Arsen Torosyan accused the Georgian government of both underreporting coronavirus-related deaths and purposefully testing at low rates in an effort to artificially lower the number of confirmed infections in Georgia.
Though the Armenian Health Ministry later apologized on Torosyan’s behalf, his remarks reflect a widespread conspiracy theory in Armenia that Georgia, which has reported dramatically fewer cases than Armenia, is covering up the true number of infections.
Other conspiracy theories that have gained widespread attention around the world have also made their way to Armenia. They include claims that the pandemic has been engineered by U.S. businessman Bill Gates to cover up plans to implant trackable microchips in humans; allegations that the spread of the virus is somehow connected to the construction of 5G cellphone towers across the globe; and anti-vaccination articles urging Armenians not to get vaccinated for the coronavirus if or when a vaccine is developed.
The latter conspiracy theory has been promoted by the website medmedia.am, which was recently revealed by the London-based media platform openDemocracy to receive U.S. funding. Aside from noting that “these opinions do not reflect the views of the U.S. government”, the U.S. Embassy in Yerevan has refused to comment on the matter, which has attracted attention in the international press.
Though several Armenian government officials, including Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, have denounced the spread of coronavirus-related fake news in the country, the government has so far refrained from taking effective steps in this regard.
In fact, a failed attempt at limiting the spread of fake news about the virus in March and April—by banning the publication of information on the disease that did not come from the Armenian government— backfired when police began requesting citizens remove social media posts critical of the government’s handling of the pandemic. Such incidents prompted a group of prominent media organizations to issue a joint statement calling the measures “ineffective, disproportionate, unreasonable, and not in the public interest.”
The explosion in coronavirus-related misinformation that Armenia now faces only further complicates an already fraught situation: media regulation of any form raises uncomfortable questions about freedom of speech and the potential abuse of regulatory laws by the government to exert political pressure.
Recently, the country has seen calls for increased media education. For instance Shushan Doydoyan, President of the Freedom of Information Center of Armenia, has stated the best way to address fake news is by promoting media literacy among the general public. In an interview with CivilNet, Armenian-American nuclear scientist Areg Danagoulian expressed similar sentiments, calling Armenia’s low levels of media education an “epidemic of ignorance.”
CIVILNET.US Defunds Armenian Website Spreading Misinformation
ECHR advisory opinion on Kocharyan case not subject to interpretation but translation – Gevorg Kostanyan
Armenia’s former Prosecutor General, Doctor of Law Gevorg Kostanyan is concerned with the fact that acting Prosecutor General has commented on the ECHR advisory opinion concerning charges brought against former President Robert Kocharyan. “The Constitutional Court of Armenia is the only and unique addressee of the ECRH advisory opinion and only the Constitutional Court may assess the decision of the European Court,” Kostanyan told an online interview on the 2nd TV Channel on Monday.
In Kostanyan’s words, the Prosecutor General’s Office and the Prosecutor General himself have no capacity to elaborate on the decision of the European court. He then suggested that the ECHR advisory opinion is not subject to interpretations but to translation only.
“There is no need to interpret the advisory opinion as the document clearly sets all the principles, resolutions and approaches the Constitutional Court should consider to apply. Any interpretation – be it from attorneys, state bodies or any other figure – has no relevance,” stressed Kostanyan, who served as Representative of the Republic of Armenia before the Court from 2004 to 2017.
He next noted that the advisory opinion contains references to precedents and previous judgements thus providing the scope for the Constitutional Court in analyzing the case. In his words, the Constitutional Court may not go beyond the scope of those precedents which have been developed over the past 50 years and outline the main approaches.
To note, Robert Kocharyan has been charged under Article 300.1 of the 2009 Criminal Code ( “Overthrow of the Constitutional order”) with offences which were alleged to have been committed in relation to events which took place in February and March 2008, when protests broke out over a disputed presidential election. At that time, a different provision of the former Criminal Code, Article 300 (“usurpation of power”), was in force.
Speaking of the provisions set out in the advisory opinion, Kostanyan recalled the ECHR reference to the Criminal Code article that cites another legal act, the Constitution which means that the requirements of clarity and foreseeability should be applicable to respective norms of the Constitution.
“It is explicit that the Article 300.1 contained a reference to Articles 1 to 5 and 6 § 1 of the Armenian Constitution of 2015. In the version of 2008 Constitutions, those articles didn’t exist in their current sequence and content. Thus it is unacceptable to speak of the clarity and foreseeability of the mentioned Article,” said Kostanyan.
Another restriction set by the ECHR for interpretation refers to the practical implementation of the legal norm.
“That is to say no derivation should for the application of Article 300.1 on the basis of formed practice in the country. In Armenia, we had the application of Article 301.1 when in 2009 or 2010 the Prosecutor General’s Office quitted the criminal prosecution and the Court acquitted the defendants. We have the practice, and the ECHR set the rule for the Constitutional Court to not leave that practice,” said Kostanyan.
To remind, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered an on former Armenian President Robert Kocharyan’s case sought by the Constitutional Court of Armenia on May 29.
Ex-prosecutor general slams Armenian authorities’ coronavirus response as ‘inefficient’
“Thanks God, I have not been infected, I am not sick. I wish good health to everyone,” Armenia’s former Prosecutor General, Doctor of Law Gevorg Kostanyan told an online interview on the 2nd TV Channel on Monday, dismissing reports that he has contracted coronavirus.
Reflecting on the situation with coronavirus in Armenia, Kostanyan stressed that many issues will inevitably receive legal and criminal assessments.
“If I’m not mistaken, we have recorded more than 270 deaths, therefore all this is subject to discussions and evaluations from the criminal and legal point of view. For example, would it have been possible to prevent these deaths if the state of emergency had been declared earlier? Would it have been possible to curb the spread of the infection and to reduce the fatalities if tougher and more efficient restrictions had been in place? These are crucial issues,” he said.
Kostanyan blasted the government’s response to the pandemic as “totally inefficient”, citing the spike in the Covid-19 cases and high death rate.
“When we impose restrictions which are supposed to be effective and there are new cases and deaths of such a rate, what’s the reason for it? Maybe they are inefficient or wrongly applied in the public life. To put it simply, Sweden is the only country in Europe that has opted against any restrictions to contain the spread of coronavirus. If I’m not mistaken, Armenia has the second highest number of infections per one million population after Sweden. Therefore, a question arises that the restrictions have zero efficiency,” he stated.
Sports: Russian Football Union to exempt Armenian footballers from ‘legionnaires’ quota
The Executive Board of the Russian Football Union (RFU) will exclude footballers from Armenia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan from the list of foreign athletes, often called as the legionnaires, allowed to play for Russia’s football clubs. As sports.ru reports, the decision will be adopted during RFU Board meeting on Tuesday.
The decision is explained by the fact that Russia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Belarus are EAEU member states and their citizens are not considered legionnaires in the Russian Premier League. Earlier, a similar decision was adopted with regard to football players from Belarus.
To note, the Russian Premier League (RPL) is currently exploiting the ‘6+5’ quota, which means that not more than six foreign players could be simultaneously playing for one club on the field during the match time.
‘legionnaires’-quota/2306821