Turkish press: Turkish defense industry to back Azerbaijan with UAVs, tech and knowledge

Bayraktar TB2 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are seen parked at an airfield in Istanbul, Turkey, June 11, 2020. (AA Photo)

The Turkish defense industry will always back Azerbaijan with its unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAV), ammunition, missiles and electronic warfare (EW) systems, Defense Industries Presidency (SSB) Chairman Ismail Demir said, noting the two countries are also set to work together on modernizing the existing systems of the Caspian country.

Demir made the statement via his Twitter account on Friday following a meeting with Ramiz Tahirov, Azerbaijan’s deputy defense minister and the commander of the air force, and the Army commander of Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, Kerem Mustafayev.

Demir noted that at a time when the duo had to show the world that those brotherly countries are again in full unity, mutual work on the defense industry was also on the agenda, saying that the Turkish defense industry, with its knowledge, technology and capabilities in all fields, will always be ready to cooperate with Azerbaijan.

“In addition to bringing new systems to the Azerbaijani army, we will work together on the modernization of existing systems, maintenance and training activities,” Demir said.

Azerbaijan has recently been witnessing border clashes that have erupted between archfoes Azerbaijan and Armenia, which have killed at least 16 people on both sides since Sunday.

The two ex-Soviet republics have been locked for decades in a conflict over Armenia’s illegal occupation of Azerbaijan’s Nagorno-Karabakh region. The territory was seized by ethnic Armenian separatists in a 1990s war that claimed 30,000 lives, though the recent fighting broke out on a northern section of their shared border far from Nagorno-Karabakh.

Earlier in June, the Azerbaijani government announced that it would purchase UCAVs from Turkey after receiving approval from its Parliament.

Speaking to a local TV broadcaster about the purchase of new weapons and military vehicles for the armed forces, Azerbaijan’s Minister of Defense Zakir Hasanov said his country sought to purchase Turkish-made combat drones after their success was demonstrated in Syria and Libya. Turkey’s use of armed drones in those countries has also been dubbed successful in terms of the use of new technologies in an ever-changing environment of defense by several international media reports, along with officials abroad.

Turkey realized its program of developing and producing drones over a short span of 10 years. The Bayraktar TB2 armed drones, produced by the country’s leading unmanned aerial platform developer Baykar, have been operationally used since 2015. They have continued to support Turkey’s fight against terrorism in other regions while providing effective surveillance, reconnaissance and fire support.

In 2019, Ukraine also bought six Turkish-produced reconnaissance and strike drones for its army, while purchasing another batch of drones from Turkey was again on the agenda, according to recent news reports.

Turkish press: Armenia targets Azerbaijan’s strategic infrastructure, lawmaker says

Armenian army attempted to attack Azerbaijani positions with artillery fire in the direction of the northwestern Tovuz border district, June 14, 2020. (AA Photo)

Arecent attempted cross-border attack by Armenian troops on northwestern Azerbaijan targeted joint energy and transport projects conducted by Baku and Ankara, an Azerbaijani lawmaker said Friday.

Parliament member Ganira Pashayeva told Anadolu Agency (AA) that the only road connecting Azerbaijan with the West through Georgia passed through the country’s Tovuz district, where Armenian forces violated a cease-fire with Azerbaijan last Sunday, martyring 12 soldiers, including high-ranking officers, and one civilian, besides wounding four other troops.

“If Armenia captures strategic points, with only one main road that connects Azerbaijan and Turkey, the two countries joint energy and transportation lines may be shot at any moment by their armed forces. This is one of the aims of occupant Armenia in targeting Tovuz,” Pashayeva said.

Noting also that Armenia opened fire on civilian settlements, she said Yerevan sought to sow panic in the region.

“But, the people did not leave their homes. Their attack on civilians will cost Armenia dearly.”

Despite international calls for restraint, Armenian troops also opened fire on residential areas in the villages of Agdam and Dondar Kuscu. A 76-year-old Azerbaijani man lost his life in the attacks by Armenia, which Baku has accused of hiding losses.

Pashayeva underlined that Baku expects a “harsh reaction” from the world and international organizations on Armenia’s attacks.

“An international organization that has not reacted to this issue will have revealed its true face. International human rights organizations should notice the rights of these people,” she said.

Pashayeva stressed that human rights groups that had advocated attacks by terrorists and coup plotters in Turkey in the defeated July 15, 2016 coup attempt also do not respond to the attacks on civilians in Azerbaijan.

The defeated coup attempt in Turkey left 251 people martyred and nearly 2,200 injured. Ankara accuses the Gülenist Terrorist Organization (FETÖ) of being behind a long-running campaign to overthrow the legitimate state apparatus through infiltrations into Turkish institutions, particularly the military, police and judiciary.

Pashayeva also highlighted that the situation in the region was under the control of the Azerbaijani army.

Last Sunday, the Armenian army attempted to attack Azerbaijani positions with artillery fire toward the northwestern Tovuz border district, withdrawing after suffering losses following retaliation from the Azerbaijani military.

Azerbaijan has blamed Armenia for the “provocative” actions, with Turkey throwing its weight behind Baku and warning Yerevan that it would not hesitate to stand against any kind of attack on its eastern neighbor.

The Armenian military had since 1991 illegally occupied the Nagorno-Karabakh region, an internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan.

Four U.N. Security Council and two U.N. General Assembly resolutions, as well as decisions by many international organizations, refer to this fact and demand the withdrawal of the occupational Armenian forces from Nagorno-Karabakh and seven other occupied regions of Azerbaijan.

Turkish press: Turkey’s missiles, drones at Azerbaijan’s service: Official – Turkey News

Turkey has declared military assistance to Azerbaijan amid the country’s border clashes with Armenia, in the second day of talks with Azeri defense officials in the capital Ankara on July 17.

“Our armed unmanned aerial vehicles, ammunition and missiles with our experience, technology and capabilities are at Azerbaijan’s service,” said İsmail Demir, the head of Presidency of Defense Industries, an affiliate of the Turkish Presidency in a statement.

“We need to show the world that the two brother countries are in full unity. One nation, two states,” Demir wrote on Twitter after the meeting with Azerbaijani Deputy Defense Minister Ramiz Tahirov and Army Commander of the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic Kerem Mustafayev.

He stressed that Turkey will lend new defense systems to Azerbaijan and will work together with Baku for the modernization, maintenance and repair of the country’s defense systems.

The show of support comes a day after Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar met Ramiz Tahirov in Ankara on July 16.

“Armenia will pay for what they have done and be brought to account,” said Akar after the meeting, showing full support to Azerbaijan.

Recent border clashes with Armenia have resulted in the killing of 11 Azerbaijani soldiers and injured four. In retaliatory attacks, Azerbaijani officials said nearly 100 Armenian troops were killed.

Turkish press: Emerging power vacuums and Turkey’s new activism

The French weekly magazine Le Point was the latest publication to join the chorus. A photograph of Erdoğan aboard the TCG Kınalıada, an anti-submarine warfare (ASW) corvette, was placed on its cover, which read: “Hagia Sophia, Syria, Libya, the Mediterranean … Erdoğan, war at our gates.”

Le Point’s editorial board appears to have translated French President Emmanuel Macron, who has been bewildered by Turkey’s Libya initiative, into text. By the “war at our gates,” they meant French interests being placed at risk in North Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean. The magazine aimed to portray Erdoğan as “destructive, belligerent and imperial” – as one of their 2019 covers suggested.

Their topics of choice – Hagia Sophia, Syria, Libya and the Mediterranean – were not coincidental either. Those were the sites of Turkey’s post-July 15 foreign policy moves – along with Hagia Sophia. All those issues reflect Turkey’s claim of independence and active agency in the international system over the last four years. Western media outlets have been calling Erdoğan an Islamist, a neo-Ottomanist, an authoritarian and a “sultan” since the Davos moment in 2009. Those labels became more commonly used after 2013, and reached a whole new level after 2016.

Erdoğan’s critics account for his emergence as an active leader in the international system through his rhetoric and new initiatives, with a “yearning for empire.” They sometimes talk about Turkey, once a secular, democratic and Western nation, turning into an Islamist, authoritarian and Oriental country. Other times, they attempt to fuel ideological polarization by referring to revanchism against the Republic and Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. All of those labels are merely intended to sentence Turkey’s newfound agency. After all, European governments must watch what Turkey is saying and doing with regard to various issues now. The European Union’s members are appalled by this new Turkey. They cannot terminate Turkey’s membership talks, threaten sanctions or offer the Turks more money.

Anti-Turkish groups within the EU nowadays fuel an Ottoman fear, which we imagined to be an exclusively Greek obsession, and threaten to punish Turkey. People like Josep Borrell, the EU’s minister for foreign affairs, who are still in touch with reality, highlight shared strategic interests by ruling out fresh crusades. There are many areas where Europe could cooperate with Turkey by redefining this ever-meaningless alliance: refugees, counterterrorism, energy, Syria, Libya, the Eastern Mediterranean, North Africa, NATO, Russia, etc.

It is unfair to describe the Justice and Development Party’s (AK Party) 18-year-old government and the People’s Alliance’s four-year history as a yearning for an empire. The age of empires is long gone. This is the time of strong nation-states rising. Global and regional turbulence clearly force Turkey to embrace fresh military activism. For the record, Turkey was the last country to become militarily involved in Syria, Iraq, the Eastern Mediterranean and Libya. The country has no expansionist or imperial agenda in any of those places. It merely seeks to protect its national security interests proactively. In response to military impositions to undermine diplomacy, Turkey resorts to hard power for negotiation purposes.

So what are the reasons behind Turkey’s new activism? The emerging power vacuum in the Middle East and North Africa due to the U.S.’ withdrawal. Turkey’s Western allies abandoning Ankara and forcing it to work with Russia in the Syrian theater. Washington’s decision to arm the terrorist organization YPG/PKK, and the EU surrendering to Greece and France’s maximalist objectives.

There is no shortage of regional players turning to activism to fill that power vacuum. Notwithstanding Iran’s 40-year-old policy of ideological expansionism, Russia has been at the forefront in recent years. The Kremlin is preparing to set foot in Libya, after Syria, to dominate North Africa. At the same time, with the Armenian attack on Azerbaijan, it adds a new link to the chain between Syria, the Eastern Mediterranean and Libya. Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) plays a destabilizing role in Yemen, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Mauritania and Somalia – as dictated by Israel’s Middle East policy.

Either way, the strong nation-state promises to be our neighborhood’s top reality for a long time.

Coronavirus could cause US to lose Iraqi Kurdish region to China

Aljazeera
Since the start of the COVID-19 crisis, China has been working to
expand its influence over the KRG through medical aid.
By Yerevan Saeed
16 Jul 2020
The coronavirus pandemic created an opportunity for China to
strengthen its burgeoning relations with Iraq's semi-autonomous oil
and gas-rich Kurdish region of northern Iraq (KRI) through medical
aid.
On March 8, the Chinese government sent 200,000 face masks to KRI to
help the Kurdish Regional Government's (KRG) efforts to stem the
spread of the virus in the region.
In the following weeks, Beijing delivered several other large batches
of medical aid containing different types of personal protective
equipment (PPE), medical devices and COVID-19 testing kits to the KRI.
The aid shipments were highly publicised and widely celebrated in the
KRI. On April 20, for example, China's Consul General to Erbil Ni
Ruchi and KRG Health Minister Saman Barzinji held an hourlong news
conference to announce the arrival of a new shipment of aid.
Speaking in front of Chinese cargo planes at the Erbil International
Airport, Ruchi said China was going to be "a friend of the people of
the Kurdistan region during hard times". At the height of the crisis,
the Chinese Consul General also appeared on local TV channels in KRI,
offering advice to the Kurdish people on how to take the necessary
measures to contain the virus.
China also sent a medical team to the Kurdish region to help the KRG.
During their four-day visit, Chinese doctors visited local hospitals
and held panels to share their experience in treating coronavirus
infections with their Kurdish counterparts.
Chinese companies also chipped in to help the Kurdish region during
the COVID-19 crisis. On April 1, China Oil HBP group, a Beijing-based
oil and gas resource development company, donated 30,000 masks and
5,400 COVID-19 testing kits to the KRG.
Sino-Kurdish relations are relatively new despite the overwhelming
influence communist China's founding father Mao Zedong's political
thoughts had on the Kurdish freedom movement.
China only started to become a real diplomatic and trade partner to
Iraqi Kurds after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's government in
2003.
Jalal al-Talabani, then leader of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan
(PUK) who would later become president of Iraq, paid an informal visit
to China in early August 2003. Subsequently, delegations from the PUK
and the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) visited China. These visits
were promptly reciprocated by senior Chinese officials.
In December 2014, when the ISIL (ISIS) group was at the peak of its
strength in Iraq, China showed its support for the Kurdish people and
the regional government by opening a consulate general in Erbil. China
chose to send delegates to the region at such a dangerous time because
it believed the economic gains it would make as a result of the move
outweighed the risks. At the time, the KRG had already taken control
of the oil-rich province of Kirkuk and built a link to connect the
oilfields there to its newly built pipeline to Turkey, raising its oil
production to 400,000 barrels per day.
Last year, China visibly increased its efforts to strengthen ties with
the region.
In April 2019, Li Jun from Communist Party of China's (CPC) Central
Committee paid a visit to Erbil and officially invited KRI President
Nechirvan Barzani to Beijing. Li told Barzani that China's President
Xi Jinping "recognises the vital role the Kurdistan Region played in
combating terrorism and defeating the so-called Islamic State".
A few months later, in August, the Chinese Consul to Erbil, Ruchi,
launched the official Facebook page of the consulate with a video
message. In the Kurdish language message, Ruchi said the Chinese
government is eager to develop its relations with the KRG,
highlighting the two peoples' historic "friendship" that dates back to
the ancient Silk Road.
In October 2019, a delegation from the Chawy Kurd Center for Political
Development, a Kurdish political education NGO, visited China on the
invitation of the Chinese government to promote Sino-Kurdish ties. The
same month, the centre published  "China's Governance", a two-volume
book authored by President Xi in which he highlights his thoughts on
governance, economic development, and leadership.
Also in October, the KRC's first Chinese language department was
opened at Erbil's Salahadin University. Subsequently, in November
2019, a Chinese cultural and commercial centre was established in the
region for the first time.
Despite these efforts, China's relationship with the KRG remained
limited and superficial until recently. The COVID-19 crisis, however,
finally provided China with the opportunity to deepen and expand its
relationship with the region and emerge as a strong strategic partner
that could offer crucial help in times of need.
Indeed, during the coronavirus crisis, Beijing's image and prominence
in the Kurdish region have improved significantly. Common Kurds who
previously viewed China solely as an exporter of cheap but poor
quality goods and products started to perceive Beijing as a global
power that could provide the region with much needed economic and
structural support. Moreover, more and more Kurds started to
acknowledge China as an effective and powerful actor in the Middle
Eastern political arena that could influence the KRG's future
international prospects.
China has a lot to gain from strengthening its ties with Erbil. If
Beijing succeeds in becoming a prominent player in the KRG, it can not
only make significant trade gains, but also use it as leverage against
Turkey.
In recent years, Turkey has become a sanctuary for political
organisations and NGOs that are working to end the persecution of the
Turkic Uighur minority in China. The Turkish government has also been
vocal on the issue, calling on international organisations and other
states to sanction China for its human rights abuses against Uighurs
and other minorities.
China can try to use its growing influence over the Iraqi Kurdish
region to silence Turkey through engagement with Kurdish organisations
and groups defending Kurdish rights in Turkey. Although there is no
indication of such cooperation yet, Beijing's investment in
cultivating stronger political, economic, and cultural ties with the
Kurds could pay off in the long run.
China's rapid move into Iraqi Kurdish region could well be an
opportunity for the KRG, but it presents a problem for Washington.
The United States has been the primary provider of financial,
security, military and political support to Kurds in Iraq since 1991.
However, recent events significantly damaged the relationship between
Erbil and Washington.
In 2017, after Iraqi Kurds overwhelmingly voted for independence in a
referendum rejected by the central Iraqi government as
"unconstitutional", US President Donald Trump failed to support the
Iraqi Kurds. Consequently, Iraqi forces and Shia armed groups known as
Popular Mobilization Forces drove Kurds out of Kirkuk. And some two
years later, the Trump administration disappointed Kurds in Iraq once
again by abandoning their brethren as they were facing an existential
threat in Syria. All this led to Kurds viewing the US as an
increasingly untrustworthy ally, and starting to look for other
supporters.
Today, China appears to be capitalising on Washington's fading
popularity in the Iraqi Kurdish region. Eventually, Beijing's
multipronged outreach strategy that is clearly already increasing
economic, cultural and political ties between KRI and China, could
allow it to claim the role of primary global power in the region.
The Iraqi Kurdish region is one of the US's most successful
state-building projects to date, despite its failures and shortcomings
in the rest of Iraq. Moreover, the KRI, with its vast natural and
human resources, has immense geopolitical importance for the US and
its allies. Washington, which is already at loggerheads with China on
many issues, cannot afford to lose the KRG to Beijing.
But the coronavirus crisis that allowed China to make significant
inroads into the KRG also offers the same opportunity to the US.
Erbil still needs significant financial and medical assistance to
manage the ongoing public health emergency. The Kurdish enclave is in
dire straits due to the decline in oil prices and Baghdad's decision
to cut its share of the national budget.
Washington can easily improve its image in the KRG by sending medical
help and helping Erbil and Baghdad reach an acceptable financial
agreement.
Today, Washington may well think Iraqi Kurdish region is not one of
its priorities. But if it does not take swift action to assure Iraqi
Kurds that the US still has their back, China can easily take its
place as the primary benefactor - and decision-maker - in the region.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not
necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
 

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 07/17/2020

                                        Friday, 
Fighting Eases On Armenia-Azerbaijan Border
        • Sargis Harutyunyan
ARMENIA -- A view shows a house, which locals said was damaged during a recent 
shelling by Azerbaijani forces, in armed clashes on the border between 
Azerbaijan and Armenia, in the village of Aygepar, Tavush Province, July 15, 2020
Armenia and Azerbaijan reported no serious ceasefire violations along their 
border on Friday after several days of heavy fighting that left at least 16 
soldiers dead and dozens of others wounded.
The Armenian military said late in the afternoon Azerbaijani forces only fired 
small arms at its positions in Tavush province, the scene of the fighting, and 
did not targeted local border villages in the past day.
“No artillery or other heavy weapons were used,” a military spokesman, Artsrun 
Hovannisian, told a news briefing in Ijevan, Tavush’s administrative center.
Hovannisian said that “tension has eased considerably.” “In essence, things are 
calm and there is no gunfire right now,” he said.
The Azerbaijani Defense Ministry spokesman, Vagif Dargahli, also described the 
situation in Azerbaijan’s Tovuz district bordering Tavush as “calm.” The 
Armenian army has stopped shelling Azerbaijani villages but is “continuing to 
shoot at our frontline positions,” he said, according to Azerbaijani news 
agencies.
Azerbaijan -- A local woman shows damage in her house after shelling by Armenian 
forces in the Tovuz region, July 14, 2020
The hostilities broke out at a Tavush-Tovuz border section on Sunday in still 
unclear circumstances. Each side accused the other of attacking its army posts 
in the mountainous area.
At least 12 Azerbaijani servicemen, including a general and a colonel, were 
killed in the clashes. The Armenian army reported four combat deaths within its 
ranks.
Hovannisian said 36 other Armenian soldiers were wounded in the clashes. Only 
ten of them are currently in hospital, he said, adding that one soldier remains 
in a critical condition.
ARMENIA -- A woman stays inside a house, which locals said was damaged during a 
recent shelling by Azerbaijani forces, in armed clashes on the border between 
Azerbaijan and Armenia, in the village of Aygepar, Tavush Province, July 15, 2020
The provincial town of Berd and several Tavush villages were shelled by the 
Azerbaijani side during what was the worst flare-up in the Nagorno-Karabakh 
conflict zone in years. Many local residents spent nights in basements and bomb 
shelters. A resident of the village of Chinari was seriously wounded in Thursday 
in what Armenian officials described as an Azerbaijani drone attack on his car.
The mayor of another Tavush village, Nerkin Karmiraghbyur, told reporters on 
Friday that about a dozen local houses were seriously damaged by Azerbaijani 
artillery fire. Other locals said some of the women and children living in the 
community were evacuated for security reasons earlier this week.
Azerbaijani authorities have reported, for their part, Armenian mortar and 
howitzer fire on Azerbaijani villages located across the heavily militarized 
border.
Putin ‘Very Concerned’ By Armenian-Azeri Clashes
        • Emil Danielyan
Russia -- Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a Security Council meeting via 
teleconference at the Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow, .
President Vladimir Putin and other top Russian officials on Friday voiced 
serious concerns over deadly hostilities on Armenia’s border with Azerbaijan and 
offered to help ease tensions between the two South Caucasus states.
They discussed the latest flare-up in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone during 
a session of Russia’s Security Council headed by Putin.
A statement by the Kremlin said participants of the meeting engaged in a 
“detailed exchange of views regarding the situation on the Armenian-Azerbaijani 
border” and expressed “deep concern” over heavy fighting that broke out there on 
July 12.
They stressed the “urgent need” for Armenia and Azerbaijan to respect the 
ceasefire and expressed Moscow’s “readiness for mediation activities,” added the 
statement. It did not give further details.
Putin’s press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, made identical comments to the Russian 
press after the meeting attended by the speakers of both houses of Russia’s 
parliament, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Federal Security Service Director 
Aleksandr Bortnikov, Foreign Intelligence Service Director Sergey Naryshkin and 
other officials.
Lavrov already telephoned his Armenian and Azerbaijani counterparts on Monday to 
call for an immediate end to the skirmishes involving artillery fire and drone 
attacks. The fighting continued in the following days, however, with the 
conflicting parties putting the blame on each other.
A Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Thursday that Moscow is “working 
with” the parties to prevent a further escalation. Neither side has reported 
serious ceasefire violations since then. According to the Armenian Defense 
Ministry, the situation at a border section where at least 16 soldiers from both 
sides have been killed since July 12 was “relatively calm” on Friday.
Armenia -- Priest Ter Abel prays for peace outside the village of Movses on the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani border, July 15, 2020
The United States, the European Union as well as Iran have also urged Baku and 
Yerevan to show restraint without holding either side responsible for the 
escalation.
By contrast, Turkey, Azerbaijan’s closest ally, has blamed the Armenian side and 
promised military aid to Baku, raising the prospect of a more direct Turkish 
involvement in the Karabakh conflict.
“Our armed unmanned aerial vehicles, ammunition and missiles are at Azerbaijan’s 
service along with our experience, technology and capabilities,” Ismail Demir, 
the head of a state body overseeing the Turkish defense industry, tweeted after 
meeting with a high-ranking military delegation from Azerbaijan in Ankara on 
Friday.
For his part, Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar said on Thursday that Armenia 
will be “brought to account” for its “attack” on Azerbaijan.
Armenia has close military ties with Russia and hosts Russian troops on its soil 
mainly because of a perceived security threat from Turkey. The latter refuses to 
establish diplomatic relations with Armenia and keeps the Turkish-Armenian 
border closed out of solidarity with Azerbaijan.
In a possible reference to Ankara, Lavrov said on Monday that all countries 
making up the OSCE Minsk Group should “avoid statements and actions that could 
provoke a further rise in tensions” in the Karabakh conflict zone.
Russian, U.S. and French diplomats co-heading the group have long been 
spearheading international efforts to broker a solution to the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani dispute.
Aliyev Again Threatens To End ‘Meaningless’ Talks With Armenia
Azerbaijan -- President Ilham Aliyev speaks with newly appointed Foreign 
Minister Jeyhun Bayramov via video link, Baku, .
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has again threatened to withdraw from further 
negotiations with Armenia, accusing it of obstructing a resolution of the 
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict sought by Azerbaijan.
Aliyev also renewed his criticism of the U.S., Russian and French mediators 
co-heading the OSCE Minsk Group, saying that they should strive to not only 
maintain the ceasefire in the conflict zone but also make Armenian-Azerbaijani 
talks “substantive.”
“We are not going to hold negotiations and meaningless video conferences for the 
sake of imitation,” he told his newly appointed Foreign Minister Jeyhun 
Bayramov, on Thursday. “There has to be a meaning.”
Aliyev went on to accuse Yerevan of “undermining the negotiating process.” “If 
we see that negotiations are meaningless we will act and come up with statements 
accordingly,” he warned.
The Armenian Foreign Ministry scoffed at the comments on Friday. “If Azerbaijan 
is now refusing to negotiate with Armenia it is not clear with whom it is going 
to negotiate on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,” said the ministry spokeswoman, 
Anna Naghdalian.
Naghdalian denounced “war threats” which she said have emanated from Baku 
lately. “If the threat to pull out of negotiations is part of the same effort 
then we are neither surprised nor impressed with that,” she said in written 
comments.
Aliyev already threatened to withdraw from the talks and lambasted the mediators 
on July 7. “[The mediators’] main point is that the problem cannot be solved 
militarily. Who said that?” he told Azerbaijani television.
Five days later, heavy fighting involving artillery fire and drone attacks broke 
out on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border in disputed circumstances. At least 
twelve Azerbaijani servicemen and four Armenian soldiers were killed in the 
clashes that prompted serious concern from the international community.
The fighting appeared to have largely ground to a halt by Thursday evening. The 
conflicting parties reported no major truce violations overnight and the 
following morning.
In a statement issued late on Wednesday, the mediators said the Armenian and 
Azerbaijani foreign ministers have pledged to “hold substantive negotiations on 
crucial aspects of a Nagorno-Karabakh settlement as soon as possible.” The 
Azerbaijani minister, Elmar Mammadyarov, was sacked and replaced by Bayramov on 
Thursday.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

Renewed Armenian-Azerbaijani Fighting Threatens to Escalate Further

Jamestown Foundation
(Source: Reuters)

Armenian and Azerbaijani military forces are engaged in their most serious armed confrontation since the so-called Four-Day War of April 2016, when hundreds of soldiers on both sides were reportedly killed and wounded along the Line of Contact, which marks the frontier of Azerbaijan’s occupied territories in and around Karabakh (see , May 5, 2016). This time, the fighting began on July 12, 2020, on the internationally recognized Azerbaijani-Armenian border, well north of Karabakh. During the Nagorno-Karabakh War in the 1990s, Yerevan refused to acknowledge its direct involvement with the forces of the breakaway self-proclaimed “Nagorno-Karabakh Republic”—until then an autonomous region in Soviet Azerbaijan and mostly populated by Armenians. Large-scale fighting in Karabakh ended in 1994, with a ceasefire and a decisive Armenian victory. Armenian forces took over all of Karabakh as well as occupied a surrounding buffer zone that was previously populated by ethnic Azerbaijanis. All attempts to broker a political solution to the conflict by the so-called Minsk Group, co-chaired by the United States, Russia and France, or efforts by Moscow separately, have been deadlocked since. Skirmishes between Azerbaijani and Armenian forces have occurred regularly up and down the LoC; but as long as they remained low-key, the outside world paid little attention.

In the latest clashes (see , July 14), both sides have reportedly used mortars, missiles and heavy guns. The Azerbaijani military has employed Israeli-made drones over Armenia for reconnaissance missions and, reportedly, for aerial attack. Yerevan demonstrated footage of what appeared to be the destruction of at least one Israeli-made Erbit Hermes 900 drone. Both sides have reported casualties, including one Azerbaijani general. Each government has accused the other of “aggression and provocation.” To date, there have been no verified reports of civilian casualties, and neither side has tried to cross the border or occupy any enemy territory in recent days. Azerbaijan and Armenia have both reported a lull in the fighting on July 15; but on July 16, mutual artillery shelling resumed (Militarynews.ru, July 16).

The two South Caucasus rivals have been building up their respective armed forces for years, in anticipation of a possible full-scale showdown. Azerbaijan has the advantage of a constant stream of oil and natural gas export revenues, allowing for a much larger defense budget compared to its neighbor. Armenia was buying almost exclusively Russian hardware on credit, while Azerbaijan has purchased weapons from Russia and other countries, including modern Israeli-made drones and precision-guided, semi-ballistic long-range LORA missiles that can hit any target inside Armenia or occupied Karabakh. Azerbaijan wields drones and third-generation Israeli and South Korean anti-tank missiles that neither Armenia nor Russia have in their inventories. The Armenian military (together with the proxy Karabakh army) possesses a large number of mostly Soviet-era tanks and other heavy weapons; but its Azerbaijani opponent holds a serious qualitative edge. Armenia additionally has Soviet-made R-17 (Scud-B) ballistic missiles as well as some more modern and accurate Iskander semi-ballistic missiles that could hit sensitive targets deep inside Azerbaijan, including oil and gas installations. However, the Azerbaijani military command has announced that such attacks would result in retaliatory targeting of the Armenian nuclear power plant at Metsamor, 36 kilometers west of Yerevan, probably using precision-guided LORA missiles. A precision strike at Metsamor—the only nuclear plant in the South Caucasus—could possibly cause a 1986 Chernobyl-style radioactive contamination disaster (Interfax, July 16).

Armenia is largely regionally isolated and semi-surrounded by hostile Azerbaijan and Turkey. The country does have a relatively close and friendly relationship with Iran, its main trading partner and home to a large and influential Armenian community (as well as a sizeable ethnic-Azerbaijani minority). But Iran’s international pariah status puts a stigma on Armenia in Israel and in the United States. At the same time, Armenia is a long-time Russian ally, a member of the Russia-dominated Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). Yet, the sitting Armenian leader, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who came to power two years ago, in a popular protest revolt that overthrow a Moscow-friendly regime, is seen in Russia with serious suspicion as a pro-Western revolutionary. Moscow has good relations with the autocratic regime of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and wants to dominate the entire region up to the former Soviet border with Turkey and Iran—a strategy requiring alliances not exclusively with Yerevan, but also with Baku and Tbilisi. Its presumed CSTO obligations notwithstanding, Russia resists being pulled into a conflict with Azerbaijan. Since the fighting is on Armenia’s state border, Yerevan requested an emergency CSTO council meeting, which was planned for July 13, but then called off without explanation. The Armenian embassy in Moscow called for CSTO support and solidarity “in deterring Azerbaijani attacks and possible hostile Turkish intervention” (TASS, July 14). On July 14, in Moscow, the CSTO council gathered for a regular meeting and announced, “The member nations were informed by the Armenian representative about the armed clashes and acknowledged the fact of being briefed” (RIA Novosti, July 14). Yerevan was only able to encourage its treaty allies to make a call for a ceasefire.

It seems neither Aliyev nor Pashinyan wants further escalation, but public opinion in both countries appears to be more belligerent. Angry demonstrations have broken out in Baku, with participants calling for war and the “liberation of Nagorno-Karabakh.” Azerbaijani police used water cannons to disperse the crowds (RBC, July 15). Under heightened public pressure, an uncontrolled escalation of tit-for-tat strikes may begin expanding the fighting along the border to Karabakh, and attacks against strategic targets could commence. Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar announced that Turkey’s military will support Azerbaijan against “Armenian aggression” (Lenta.ru, July 14). Russia has a military base in Armenia, which hosts several thousand ground troops, plus armor, fighter jets and anti-aircraft missiles. These forces are not there to fight Azerbaijan but to deter Turkey (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). But if push comes to shove, the massive Turkish military would have the upper hand in the South Caucasus, while sending Russian military reinforcements to Armenia through Georgia would be a problem. If the present Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict is not stopped soon by a serious ceasefire, a nightmare scenario could suddenly emerge out of the recently published Russian nuclear doctrine: A devastating attack against Russia (or its allies) that warrants the practical use of nuclear deterrence to deescalate (see , June 4).

Henrikh Mkhitaryan offers support to Armenian soldiers

Public Radio of Armenia

Residents of Armenia’s Chinari say they aren’t afraid of anything and won’t leave village

News.am, Armenia
Residents of Armenia’s Chinari say they aren’t afraid of anything and won’t leave village Residents of Armenia’s Chinari say they aren’t afraid of anything and won’t leave village

00:37, 18.07.2020
                  

Wounded resident of Armenia’s Chinari says he and other villagers won’t give up

News.am, Armenia
Wounded resident of Armenia’s Chinari says he and other villagers won’t give up Wounded resident of Armenia’s Chinari says he and other villagers won’t give up

00:27, 18.07.2020
                 

We’re not going to give up. Our villagers don’t give up. This is what resident of Chinari village Aramayis Hovakimyan, who was wounded after being struck by Azerbaijan’s unmanned combat aerial vehicle yesterday, said in the video disseminated by the Armenian Unified Information Center today. “Nine years ago, I became disabled after losing a leg, but I’ll stand with the Armenian army, if necessary,’ Aramyis Hovakimyan said and added the following:

“We have brave men who proved that they are stronger than us. I’ll always stand with them, even in this condition, if necessary. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again — there’s no turning back. This is our sacred place, our village.”

Yesterday resident of Chinari village Aramayis Hovakimyan was wounded after being struck by Azerbaijan’s unmanned combat aerial vehicle. He is currently at the hospital, and doctors say his condition is stable.