Azerbaijani press: Azerbaijani scientist talks underground water channels under Armenian occupation

BAKU, Azerbaijan, Aug. 12

By Ilhama Isabalayeva– Trend:

There is a serious need in Azerbaijan for carrying out scientific research works in qanats (underground water channel), Director of the Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry of the Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences (ANAS) Alovsat Guliyev told Trend.

One of the important issues in terms of the efficient use of water resources is the protection and operation of qanats as water sources.

“Back in 1938, there were 1,500 qanats in Azerbaijan, of which 885 were officially registered, and these channels were used as sources of drinking and irrigation water,” Guliyev noted.

He added that more than 500 million cubic meters of water were used annually through the qanats.

“Currently, 332 of these qanats are under Armenian occupation,” he said.

“Based on the agreement concluded with ANAS and Azersu OJSC, the qanats are being studied in the territory of Azerbaijan,” the director added.

“At present, the restoration of the qanats is underway in the Hasansu village of the Aghstafa district. Since the restoration of the qanats and the design of new ones are quite a costly work from a financial point of view, finding new sources of financing is the most important issue. But not everything should be left to the state. Patriotic businessmen should also support this activity,” Guliyev said.

Azerbaijani press: Azerbaijan, Serbia mull cooperation in fight against organized crimes [VIDEO]

By Akbar Mammadov

Azerbaijan’s Interior Minister Vilayat Eyvazov and the visiting Serbian counterpart Nebojsa Stefanovic have discussed cooperation in fight against transnational organized crime, the ministry reported on August 11.

During the meeting, Eyvazov said that only join efforts can effectively combat this type of crimes. In his words, the fight against drug trafficking, international terrorism, human trafficking, illegal migration and cyber-crime, which are the main types of transnational organized crime, is in the spotlight.

Eyvazov informed his Serbian counterpart about the reforms implemented in the law enforcement agencies, reminding that Azerbaijan has adopted new laws regulating the activities of the police, based on democratic principles.

The minister added that the implementation of these laws is of special importance. Eyvazov, also highlighted that one of the important changes in this direction is to advance the activities in accordance with the best world practices.

Over the past 10 years, about 8,000 employees and servicemen have been involved in numerous pieces of training and exercises through a number of international organizations.

Eyvazov said that these training and exercises have a positive effect on the improvement of the professionalism and training level of staff. He also noted that the most modern information technologies are widely used in terms of taking urgent measures against illegal actions to which citizens are exposed.

In turn, expressing gratitude for the warm reception, Stefanovic said that relations between the two countries had expanded and deepened in recent years.

The two countries suffering from similar conflicts take the same position on a number of issues at the international level, said the Serbian minister. He also underlined that his country is interested in the further development of cooperation with the Interior Ministry of Azerbaijan that is considered a close friend for Serbia.

A number of other issues of mutual interest were also discussed at the meeting.

It should be noted that Stefanovic is also Serbia’s deputy prime minister and Secretary of the National Security Council.

Stefanovic visited Azerbaijan on August 11. Before the meeting with the Azerbaijani Interior Minister, the Serbian delegation also met with senior Azerbaijani officials – Secretary of the Security Council under the President of Azerbaijan Ramil Usubov, Presidential Aide and Head of the Foreign Policy Department of the Presidential Administration Hikmet Hajiyev, Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov and Azerbaijani Ambassador to Serbia Eldar Hasanov.

During the meeting, Serbia and Azerbaijan discussed security cooperation and reached an agreement in expanding cooperation in the exchange of sensitive information, counter-terrorism and other significant fields.

The Serbian delegation’s visit to Baku follows the phone conversation held between President Ilham Aliyev and Serbian President Alexandar Vučić on August 7. During the phone call, Vučić said that a high-level Serbian delegation would be sent to Azerbaijan in the near future to investigate Armenia’s use of Serbian-made weapons during the recent cross-border clash with Azerbaijan.

President Ilham Aliyev noted that Armenia’s use of Serbian-made ammunition in shelling Azerbaijani military and civilian positions that killed servicemen and a civilian has caused concern among the Azerbaijani public.

Earlier, on July 20, Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry summoned Serbia’s Chargé d’Affaires Danica Veinovic over the delivery of a large amount of military ammunition and mortar from Serbia to Armenia.

The cross-border clashes between Azerbaijan and Armenia started on July 12 noon after Armenian troops fired artillery at Azerbaijani military post in Tovuz region. 

Azerbaijani armed forces retaliated destroying a stronghold, bombshells, vehicles and servicemen on the territory of Armenia’s military unit by using artillery, mortars and tanks. Azerbaijan has also downed six Armenian UAVs.  

Azerbaijan lost 12 servicemen, including an army general, as well as a civilian during cross-border clashes from July 12 till July 16. 

Akbar Mammadov  is AzerNews’ staff journalist, follow him on Twitter: @AkbarMammadov97

Follow us on Twitter @AzerNewsAz

Azerbaijani press: Armenia’s Metsamor nuclear power plant poses threat to region

By Akbar Mammadov

Armenia poses a threat to regional security not only through its military provocations and policy of occupation but also with its outdated Metsamor nuclear power plant (NPP), which experts consider to be dangerous. 

“Armenia’s Metsamor nuclear power plant, which is located in a seismic region, poses a threat to the region,” Azerbaijani Ambassador to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Galib Israfilov has said in an interview with the weekly edition of the Nuclear Intelligence Weekly of the energy company Energy Intelligence Group.

Israfilov said that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) does not have mechanisms to address these concerns as Armenia is unwilling to consider these issues.

“Firstly, the Armenian government must demonstrate the political intention and will to be more transparent with its neighbours in the region, and also to be more forthcoming regarding concerns about the safety of the NPP,” he said.

Israfilov also stressed that IAEA, which has only a bilateral agreement with Armenia, cannot trigger any mechanism to enforce Armenia to do it.

“In the meantime, you cannot address the concerns regarding Metsamor outside the context of security in the region. And the security is seriously undermined by the Armenians’ armed aggression unleashed against Azerbaijan, and its continued occupation of our territories,” said Israfilov.

Israfilov reiterated the position of the Azerbaijani side, emphasizing that the Azerbaijani Armed Forces do not target any civilian objects and infrastructure in Armenia. No such task has been set for the Azerbaijani Armed Forces, and all speculations on this issue are unfounded, he said.

Israfilov also spoke about Azerbaijan’s cooperation within the IAEA, mechanisms for controlling the peaceful use of nuclear energy by the international organization, opportunities for action in a multi-territorial framework and other topics. 

In the meantime, despite Metsamor NPP’s risk to the region, Armenia seeks to operate this nuclear plant until 2026. The Armenian government has agreed with Russian nuclear agency Rosatom to keep the plant running beyond its original closing date of 2016. 

Experts have long been voicing concerns over Metsamor’s danger to the region.

Antonia Wenisch of the Austrian Institute of Applied Ecology in Vienna has called Metsamor ‘among the most dangerous’ nuclear plants still in operation, saying that a rupture ‘would almost certainly immediately and massively fail the confinement,’ in an article published at National Geographic.

“There is an open reactor building, a core with no water in it, and accident progression with no mitigation at all”.

“It is in the midst of a strong seismic zone that stretches in a broad swath from Turkey to the Arabian Sea near India,” the article said.

Polish politician and Member of the European Parliament Anna Fotyga also raised the questions about the possible threat of the nuclear power plant to the regional security in 2017.

“Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant in Armenia is the last of its kind outside Russia that still uses an outdated model from the 1960s. The Soviet model of using a pressurised water reactor is often cited as the most dangerous kind of nuclear power plant, as it does not meet the minimum required safety standards. In addition, Metsamor is situated in an active earthquake zone just 30 km from Yerevan, and as such poses a potential threat to the Armenian capital and the whole South Caucasus region,” Fotyga said.

MEP Fotyga noted that smuggling of nuclear and radioactive materials from Armenia was observed, thus Georgia’s security services could prevent a number of such cases such as smuggling of highly enriched uranium.

Metsamor, which was built in 1969 during the USSR and now is the only VVER 440, Model 230, operating outside of Russia, is still functioning.  

It should be noted that the Metsamor nuclear plant does not have any containment vessel. Its VVER-440 reactor lacks a shell that would contain radiation in the event of an accident.

The US government has called the NPP “ageing and dangerous, while the EU envoy had called Metsamor “a danger to the entire region”. Armenian expert on energy at the UNDP Ara Marjanyan told “BBC” that “the design of our VVR-type reactors is rather old. For instance, they do not have concrete containment domes to contain possible explosion debris.”

Five years ago, the Members of the EU Parliament Heidi Hautala and Ulrike Lunacek, who served as Vice President of the EUP as well, also questioned the threat and out-of-dated design of the Metsamor NPP in a parliament session and reminded that in 2012, the parliament adopted a resolution recommending the closure of the Metsamor plant before 2016.

Akbar Mammadov  is AzerNews’ staff journalist, follow him on Twitter: @AkbarMammadov97

Follow us on Twitter @AzerNewsAz

Turkish press: Armenia has proven it is not trustworthy, Turkey’s foreign minister says

Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu with Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov in Ankara, Aug. 11, 2020. (AA Photo)

Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu has criticized Armenia for refusing to establish a dialogue to resolve the problems in Nagorno-Karabakh, reiterating Turkey’s determination to support Azerbaijan in the dispute.

“Armenia has proven it is not a trustworthy country,” Çavuşoğlu told reporters at a joint news conference with Azerbaijani counterpart Jeyhun Bayramov on Tuesday. He added that Yerevan has hesitated to establish dialogue in order to solve its dispute with Azerbaijan.

“Azerbaijan is not alone,” the minister continued, “We work under the notion of ‘one nation, two states,’ and we have conducted our meeting today with the same understanding.”

“Armenia for years has been occupying 20% of Azerbaijani territory as well as the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Despite all the decisions given until today, that is, by the U.N., the European Council and the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), Armenia has not neared solving the problem while the latest attack proved to the world that it is not a reliable partner for negotiations,” Çavuşoğlu stated, referring to the border clashes between Baku and Yerevan in the northwestern Tovuz border region on July 12.

As a result, at least 12 Azerbaijani soldiers, including a major general and a colonel, were killed and another four soldiers wounded. A 76-year-old Azerbaijani citizen also lost his life.

Rather than in the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which constitutes the main source of tensions between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Yerevan this time attacked the Tovuz region – an area with strategic and economic significance in terms of energy, hosting strategically important pipelines.

Nagorno-Karabakh, an internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan, has been under illegal Armenian occupation since 1991.

International organizations, including the U.N., have demanded the withdrawal of the occupational forces.

The OSCE Minsk Group – co-chaired by France, Russia and the U.S. – was formed in 1992 to find a peaceful solution to the conflict, but to no avail.

“There are clear decisions. Why has this problem not been solved despite these decisions? The reason is that the international community, especially the Minsk group, has not engaged in honest efforts. Within the scope of Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity, we wish for this problem to be solved with diplomacy and dialogue,” the top diplomat said.

“However, the OSCE has to get its act together; it has to put effort apart from the routine announcements,” Çavuşoğlu said, reminding that OSCE visited Turkey ahead of the Armenian attack and that Ankara stated these problems openly.

“Though we have clearly stated our thoughts, underlined that this problem has to be solved with diplomacy, in a peaceful manner and within the framework of international law, we will stand by Azerbaijan whichever way they prefer,” he added.

Bayramov, for his part, thanked Turkey for support during the recent border tensions. “Brotherly Turkey always categorically supports Azerbaijan’s position in line with international law,” he said, adding that Baku also always supported Turkey’s “just stand.”

The meeting marked Bayramov’s first visit abroad in his capacity as foreign minister. The politician, 47, who had served as education minister since April 2018, was appointed to the post by decree of Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev on July 16. Longtime Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov was dismissed from his position in July in the wake of the border conflict.

The sacking of Mammadyarov, who held the post since 2004, came a day after Aliyev publicly criticized him at a government session for his approach in dealing with the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict.

Bilateral cooperation enhanced

Çavuşoğlu further underlined that cooperation in all fields would continue to be enhanced and that Azerbaijan was now the primary natural gas supplier for Turkey. Meanwhile, he added, both countries would continue to work to reach the target of a $15 billion trade volume set by the two countries’ presidents.

“Mutual investment increases, especially in the field of energy, Azerbaijan is carrying out its greatest projects in Turkey while Turkey is the biggest investor country in Azerbaijan apart from the energy sector,” Çavuşoğlu stated, adding that cooperation will also be enhanced in the fields of culture, education and consulates.

“Azerbaijan-Turkey relations, which are based on historical roots and brotherhood, are developing in all areas, including the political, economic, humanitarian and military fields,” Bayramov continued, adding that the development of relations with strategic partner Turkey is Azerbaijan’s foreign policy priority.

Bayramov pointed out that the trade volume increased by 33% in 2019 compared with the previous year. Stating that 2020 had been a difficult year for the whole global economy, Bayramov added that the trade volume between Turkey and Azerbaijan had still increased by 20% in the first five months of the year.

Çavuşoğlu also reiterated that visa obligations had been mutually removed between the two countries and that efforts were ongoing to increase the visa exemption period from 30 days to 90.

“This is not enough. Turkish and Azerbaijani citizens should not need passports for mutual visits. We have realized this ability in our cooperation with Georgia and Ukraine. Since our new IDs include all kinds of information, we have presented proposals to pave the way for travel via ID,” Çavuşoğlu stated.

Bayramov also met with President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan later in the day.

Turkish press: Azerbaijani lawmaker: Turkey-Azerbaijan military drills demonstrate power, courage

People demonstrate their support for Azerbaijan against the recent Armenian attacks, in Turkish capital Ankara, Aug. 8, 2020. (AA Photo)

Recent large-scale military drills performed jointly by Turkey and Azerbaijan have demonstrated the power, bravery and defense capabilities of both nations’ armed forces, according to an Azerbaijani lawmaker.

“The military partnership constitutes an important vector of Azerbaijan-Turkey strategic cooperation,” Sevil Mikayilova, an Azerbaijani parliamentarian, told Anadolu Agency (AA) Tuesday.

Referring to the 13-day joint military exercises – which ended on Monday – a “source of pride” for both nations, Mikayilova said the drills, which involved both air and ground forces, were not the first of their kind, as the two countries have been holding such exercises on a regular basis since 2015, sometimes in partnership with neighboring Georgia.

Cooperation between Azerbaijan and Turkey is not directed against any other country or group, she stressed, referring to cooperation as “for the sake of peace and partnership” springing from the two states’ historical and cultural roots and ethnic identity.

“For Azerbaijan, Turkey is the closest ally and fraternal country,” Mikayilova said.

Turkey and Azerbaijan, with the participation of the countries’ air and ground forces, launched joint military drills in the wake of recent Armenian attacks on Azerbaijani border points.

The war exercises began on July 29, with Aug. 5 being the last day of ground engagements – including artillery, armored vehicles and mortars striking simulated targets – in the capital Baku and the exclave of Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan’s autonomous region bordering Turkey. Air combat drills involving jets and helicopters continued in Baku, Nakhchivan, Ganja, Kurdamir and Yevlakh until Monday.

Mikayilova also underlined that Ankara had always supported Baku’s “fair position” on resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh issue between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

“We are grateful to brotherly Turkey for the immediate support it demonstrated during the last attacks,” she said.

“Turkey has many times stated that they regard the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as a domestic issue and that Ankara would never change its position on this problem.”

Last month, Armenia attacked Azerbaijani troops in the northwestern Tovuz border region. As a result, at least 12 Azerbaijani soldiers, including a major general and a colonel, were killed and another four soldiers wounded. A 76-year-old Azerbaijani citizen also lost his life.

Azerbaijan accused Armenia of taking “provocative” actions, with Ankara warning Yerevan it would not hesitate to stand against any kind of attack on Azerbaijan.

Nagorno-Karabakh, an internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan, has been under illegal Armenian occupation since 1991.

International organizations, including the United Nations, have demanded the withdrawal of the occupational forces.

Relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan are seen as “exemplary worldwide” and are developing at a high level in almost every sphere, she said.

Unity between the two countries lays the groundwork for all regional cooperation formats, Mikayilova said, adding that this unity promotes regional peace and cooperation.

Following the recent skirmishes on the frontier, there is currently “a relative calm” on the border between Azerbaijan and Armenia, but overall, the situation remains “highly tense,” she said.

The lawmaker highlighted that frequent armistice breaches on the line of contact were another “source of tension” showing how “fragile” the cease-fire agreement remained.

“So we feel a colossal threat to our western borders from the part of Armenia, and war could flare up any moment due to Armenia’s unpredictable behavior and provocations.”

The recent attacks on Azerbaijani positions in Tovuz were not random but had “precise aims,” said Mikayilova.

Mikayilova stressed that the unresolved Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was a threat to regional security.

She said over the last quarter-century the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group had been “quite an ineffective platform” for resolving the conflict.

The OSCE Minsk Group, co-chaired by France, Russia and the United States, was formed in 1992 to find a peaceful solution to the conflict but to no avail.

“The OSCE Minsk Group failed to create an available mechanism or initiate any proposal to push the peace diplomacy from the deadlock. Organizing talks between the conflicting sides just for the sake of talks and making a declarative statement just for the sake of a statement could not change the status quo in the negotiation process,” she said.

Mikayilova urged the group to impose “strict sanctions” on the aggressor country – Armenia – to fulfill its international obligations.

“The OSCE Minsk Group needs to distinguish an aggressor country from a country subjected to aggression.”

Turkish press: Joe Biden’s foreign policy and Turkey

As the U.S. presidential election on Nov. 3 approaches, arguments between U.S. President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden have reached a climax. As we all know, Biden is leading in all polls. Many people and institutions even say that it is already over for Trump, and Biden will win, yet I think it is better to be wary, as Nov. 3 is a long way off.

One of the most common questions is: “What is Biden’s foreign policy going to be?” It is better not to have high expectations, as Biden is expected to adopt a policy in line with former U.S. President Barack Obama’s foreign policy. Biden, who was the vice president during Obama’s presidency, played a pioneering role in Afghanistan, Iraq and Ukraine. Let us remind you that he was a longtime member of the Foreign Relations Committee when he was a senator from 1973 to 2009. Biden has an extensive foreign policy background.

During his speech at a university in New York in 2019, Biden said: “In my opinion, foreign policy is domestic policy, and domestic policy is foreign policy. They are deeply connected.” He added that U.S. security was directly dependent on having “the strongest possible network of partners and allies working with one another.”

Let’s take a look at Biden’s possible foreign policy. When we look at his Asia policy, the first thing that comes to mind is China. Characterizing Trump’s tariffs against China as self-determined and irregular, he is expected to take a more globalist approach, lowering the tariff on some products and imposing sanctions according to international trade rules. Criticizing the treaty of commerce in January, he stressed that China is the top winner. He is expected to invigorate the naval assets of the U.S. in the Asia Pacific and establish closer ties with Indonesia, Japan, South Korea and Australia. He says he will fight against China’s persecution of 1 million Muslims in China and that Washington thinks the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) will condemn China. North Korea is also another issue in the region, and Biden says diplomatic relations should continue and North Korea must cease with its use of nuclear weapons, adding that he will not meet North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in person.

The Middle East is one of the top foreign policy agendas for the U.S. The U.S.-Israel relationship in particular is the most important item when we talk about issues in the Middle East. Biden, who describes himself as a Zionist, says he will continue to have good relations with Israel but believes in the two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian issue. He has said he would appreciate it if the U.S. embassy remains in Jerusalem. He states that he opposes the idea of Israel unfairly expanding to residential areas of Palestine and that he is open to financial support for Palestine, which Trump has cut off.

Regarding Iran, he sides with the return to the nuclear deal – that is to say, he adopts a soft policy on Iran, but he is also against the manufacturing of nuclear weapons there. Moreover, he states that the murder of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani has triggered the tension with Iran in a cruel manner. Regarding the Syria issue, he thinks that the YPG/PKK terrorist group should be supported and that it is wrong for the U.S. to withdraw its troops from Syria, as it only advances the humanitarian crisis and the potential gains of Daesh terrorists.

Biden does not have warm feelings when it comes to Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is held responsible for the murder of Saudi dissident and journalist Jamal Khashoggi and for the civil war in Yemen; hence, Biden has had a distant relationship with the Saudis since 2014.

European Union and Russia

Biden, who is of Irish origin, wants to establish closer relations with some countries, and especially with France. He also sides with the return of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) as a partnership in 5G against China. Greeks have full support for Biden, and he is well aware of the demands of the Greeks and answers to their problems.

When it comes to Russia, he has stated that Putin is attacking Western democracy and trying to weaken NATO. Biden sides with establishing a special investigation commission on Russia’s attack on U.S. democracy and putting more pressure on Russia with the support of NATO and the European Union. Ukraine also sides with boosting military aid against Russia.

Biden’s views on Turkey include:

– He is against storing nuclear weapons at the İncirlik Air Base.

– He is against Turkey’s military operations in Syria and stated that YPG/PKK was betrayed by the U.S.

– He made statements relating to concerns about freedom of the press and human rights in Turkey.

– He emphasizes that, in collaboration with its allies in the Eastern Mediterranean, Turkey must be isolated.

– He sides with Turkey’s withdrawal of Russian S-400 missiles; otherwise, he demands sanctions.

– He has not made any statements about the Gülenist Terror Group (FETÖ) or the extradition of its members to Turkey, and nothing was done on the issue during his vice presidency.

– He criticized the decision to turn Hagia Sophia into a mosque.

– He said that he would recognize the so-called Armenian genocide.

Biden, in an interview with The New York Times in January, clearly expressed that the U.S. should interfere in Turkey’s domestic policy and should support these efforts by taking a certain side, as Washington was involved in such activities in the past.

He has visited Turkey four times. He made his first visit in December 2011, during the Arab Spring, and his second visit took place just after the U.S. air bombardments against Daesh terrorists in November 2014. Following his third visit in January 2016 for meetings against Daesh, he visited Turkey for the fourth time after the failed coup attempt in August 2016.

Biden has made two apologies to Turkey so far. He described Turkey as the most problematic country in the Middle East in a speech at Harvard University in October 2014. After witnessing the reactions to his speech, he called President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to apologize. The second apology took place on his last visit after the 2016 failed coup attempt. Barack Obama was one of the first people Erdoğan called after the attack, and the American president had said, “The American people stand by you.” But Biden wanted to apologize for not coming soon enough following the failed coup attempt, saying: “But I do want to apologize. I wish I could have been here earlier.”

Apart from this, he is expected to take steps such as lifting the ban on immigrants from Muslim countries, improving relations with the World Health Organization (WHO), stopping the efforts to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, and rejoining UNESCO and the United Nations Human Rights Commission.

As I always say, whoever becomes the president of the U.S. should not break ties with Ankara due to Turkey’s NATO membership and strategic position. Ankara will continue to discuss and solve problems through diplomacy.

If Trump wins the election again, relations between Turkey and the U.S. will remain pretty much the same. If Biden wins, yes, it still will not be an easy relationship, and some new problems will be added to the current issues, but the ties will not break completely.

Let’s remember what famous American statesman Dean Gooderham Acheson said: “Effective leaders don’t just look after their own interests; they also care for the interests of their allies genuinely.”

Whoever wins the elections in November, the international reputation of the U.S. will continue to deteriorate if they do not relearn how to care for the general interest in their relations, not only with Turkey but also with other allies.

*Senior foreign policy expert, a 2019 Ellis Island Medal of Honor recipient

Turkish press: Excavation underway around Anatolia’s first Turkish mosque

A young man is seen at the excavation site at Ebu’l Manuçehr Mosque, Kars, eastern Turkey.

Excavation and restoration work at Ebu’l Manuçehr, the first Turkish mosque in Anatolia, has entered its second month. The mosque, located at the Ani Ruins in eastern Turkey’s Kars, will be opened to worshippers once the restoration is complete.

It was built by Ebu’l Manuçehr Bey, after Seljuk Sultan Alparslan won the Battle of Manzikert in 1071. Situated near the middle of two deep bottlenecks of the Arpaçay River on the Turkish-Armenian border, Ani Ruins is recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

The mosque is named after Ebu’l Manuçehr Bey who built it.

Ani was ruled by the Bagrationi dynasty from 884 to 1045 and by the Byzantine Empire from 1045 to 1064. It became Turkish territory after it was seized by Sultan Alparslan on Aug. 16, 1064. Having served as home to at least 23 different civilizations since its foundation, Ani consists of religious buildings, including mosques, churches and cathedrals, which all share different beauty and historical value. The site is also home to numerous invaluable historical buildings and cultural treasures. Ani is of particular importance as the first gateway from the Caucasus to Anatolia.

Excavation work at and around Ebu’l Manuçehr, which is one of the most significant mosques in Ani, began in July with the permission of the General Directorate of Cultural Assets and Museums of the Culture and Tourism Ministry. The project is headed by the Kars Museum Directorate, under the scientific supervision of Muhammet Arslan, head of the Department of Art History at Kars University. Currently, work continues at four different points in the area.

The excavation site around Ebu’l Manuçehr Mosque, Kars, eastern Turkey, Aug. 10, 2020. (AA PHOTO)

Islamic-era coins

Arslan, the academic advisor of the excavation, told journalists that the scientific excavations at the Ani Ruins started on July 6 and will continue until Sept. 10.

He added that they are carrying out excavations with a team of 42 people from various universities. “Under a protocol, signed by the Culture and Tourism Ministry and the General Directorate of Development Agencies, the Ebu’l Manuçehr Mosque will be restored. Meanwhile, a team of archeologists continues excavation work to prepare Ebu’l Manuçehr for detailed restoration. Glazed and unglazed ceramic pieces, ornamented and patterned ceramics have been found during excavations. We’ve also found coins from Bagrationi, Seljuk and Islamic eras.”

A photo from the interior of the Ebu’l Manuçehr Mosque, Kars, eastern Turkey, Aug. 10, 2020. (AA PHOTO)

Arslan said they have unearthed the remains of another mosque, which they think belonged to the Seljuk period. “We have unearthed the mosque, with some parts of its walls and mihrab (a semicircular niche in the wall of a mosque that indicates the direction of the Kaaba in Mecca). We continue to work with the license and financing from the General Directorate of Cultural Assets and Museums. In addition, Serhat Development Agency is also supporting our work to a large extent,” he said.

Asbarez: President, Prime Minister Discuss Pressing Issues Facing Armenia

August 12,  2020


President Armen Sarkissian (left) and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan meet on August 11

President Armen Sakissian and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan met Tuesday at the presidential headquarters to discuss pressing issues facing Armenia, among them last month’s aggression by Azerbaijan on Armenia’s borders, Turkey’s recent threats to Armenia, as well as the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and the economic fallout from the crisis.

Azerbaijan-Turkey
In the wake of the escalation of aggression by Azerbaijan along the Armenian border last month, President Sarkissian expressed his complete support to the government, and to Pashinyan, the Defense Ministry and the Armed Force, saying he will do everything in his power to be of service.

“I was in Tavush—in the border village of Chinari,” said Sarkissian. “I was very pleased to see the local population in high spirits. Everyone, both adults and children, were self-confident, full of energy and optimism. I came back convinced that our people will continue to stand by our soldiers and our army,” said Sarkissian.

“I do believe that these difficult days should become the start of future achievements. Today we should build the strong groundwork for our future successes,” said Sarkissian. “Everyone needs to be disciplined, hardworking and highly dedicated in order to overcome all these challenges.”

“We witnessed a flagrant act of aggression by Azerbaijan against the sovereign territory of Armenia,” Pashinyan told the president.

“It is important to note that the military rhetoric being advanced by the leadership of Azerbaijan for years that advanced the myth that the Azerbaijani army had superiority over the Armenian armed forces, collapsed in a flash following [last month’s] incidents. To my mind, this has led to a completely new geopolitical and military-political situation in the region,” continued Pashinyan.

“By and large, this comes to strengthen Armenia’s long-standing position, which has been adhered to by all Armenian authorities and governments, namely that the Karabakh conflict has no military solution—it can be resolved exclusively through peaceful means. This is a reality that must be reckoned with,” added Pashinyan.

Armenia’s Armed Forces stand ready to defend the territorial integrity of our country, its borders, and the reforms carried out in the security and defense sectors over the past two years in pursuit of the government’s priorities have yielded the desired result. And I am pleased to stress that no time was wasted in this respect,” explained Pashinyan.

The prime minister acknowledged that this year has seen its share of hardships, serious challenges and incidents, citing last week’s explosion in Beirut as an example. Pashinyan said the development in Lebanon will have a direct impact on Armenia.

“I share your view that Azerbaijan’s offensive has no human or moral explanation. At a time when the world is fighting against the common enemy [the pandemic], Azerbaijan undertakes its military exploits,” Sarkissian told Pashinyan.

“As an experienced person who follows the developments in Azerbaijan, Turkey, Russia and Europe, I am concerned about several factors. First of all, the moral compass that they violated by undertaking these exploits during the global pandemic. Second, Azerbaijan is trying to give the impression that Armenia poses threats to international infrastructure in its territory. This is complete nonsense. This infrastructure has existed for over 20 years, and Armenia has never shown any intention to destroy it,” said Sarkissian. “Their propaganda seeks to present Armenia as an aggressor in order to justify their own aggression in the future. I am proud to state that our armed forces lived up to the task set before them.”

“In the early 1990s, when I served as ambassador to many European countries, including NATO,” Sarkissian said “many diplomats and military experts told me that our efforts were doomed to failure, since we are a small country, we do not have a powerful army, while Azerbaijan has a huge army and is being backed by the neighboring country. A few years later the same people told me that Armenia has the most powerful army in the South Caucasus.”

“Recent events have shown that Armenia has the most powerful army in the South Caucasus, which cannot be defeated. The army is not only weapons, discipline and readiness; the Armenian army boasts a high spirit that no one has in the region. I am happy that those people’s suspicions about the Armenian army were dispelled,” said Sarkissian.

The president expressed concern over Azerbaijani official statements threatening to strike Armenia’s Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant.

“This is inadmissible by all international norms,” said Sarkissian. “I have been a member and chairman of the World Energy Security Commission, which considers such statements to be calls for nuclear terrorism. I think those who make such calls should understand very well that this will be a great tragedy for everyone—not only for Armenia. The international community should intervene to prevent such irresponsible statements from recurring again,” added Sarkissian.

The president also took not of the recent threats and bellicose statements coming from Ankara, calling them “unacceptable.”

“Turks should remember that their state was behind the Armenian Genocide 105 years ago. Any such statement calls for a return to the 105-year-old history, which is inadmissible not only for our people, but for all mankind, in general,” said Sarkissian.

COVID-19 and its Economic Implications
President Sarkissian said he was pleased at the drop in the coronavirus infections in Armenia and expressed hope that the downward trend will continue. The president added, however, that the authorities should not let their guard down, warning that if the population comes in contact with the virus, it could mean a second wave for Armenia.

“I agree with you that we must strictly observe the anti-pandemic rules—I mean personal hygiene, social distancing and proper behavior,” said Sarkissian, who added that the current economic difficulties stem from the pandemic, as is the case around the world.

“The global setback indirectly affects the Armenian economy. It will have a strong impact on some sectors, including the hospitality industry, tourism, jobs, social services. We are in dire economic straits in fact; we are facing big problems,” said Sarkissian.

In response, Pashinyan concurred with the president about the seriousness of the COVID-19 crisis in Armenia.

“Looking back on what happened I can say that in late April we noticed that while the restrictions apparently were being carried in public venues, they did not work behind the scenes—in courtyards and at close quarters. We failed to meet the target, and as a result, we lost 70,000 jobs in April alone,” reported Pashinyan.

The prime minister also said that despite the UN Secretary General’s appeal to observe a universal ceasefire during the pandemic, Azerbaijan’s continued rhetoric made his government realize that the country could not stand idly by in the face of a possible escalation.

He told the president that the government formulated capacity building in the healthcare sector to ensure that citizens were not left without proper medical care. Pashinyan said the government’s extra spending on more medical equipment and suppliers made it possible to restore 50,000 jobs in June and and a slightly higher mark in July compared with the same period last year.

“It was obvious to me that if we had been guided solely by health considerations, we would have faced a social collapse,” said Pashinyan.

The prime minister lamented the high death toll from the COVID-19 crisis, but told the president that there has been a steady decline in the number of deaths, adding, however, that the fatality rate is not at zero due to past developments.

“I regret that we have more than 800 deaths at this point of time,” said Pashinyan saying individual behavior is the only guarantee to ensure a decline in deaths and cases.

Saying that other countries are currently restoring tougher restrictions after having declared that they had overcome the pandemic, Pashinyan expressed optimism about Armenia situation in the fall.

“Yes, you are right,” Pashinyan told the president. “We are facing serious economic problems, and we are trying to find case-sensitive solutions. Our main task is to save the jobs. This is the preliminary target, but it means boosting exports, production and consumption.”

The prime minister said that the government has implemented more than 20 anti-crisis measures, within the framework of which it has already invested more than 100 billion drams in various social and economic programs through the banking system and the state budget.

This process will continue for the private sector to ensure that economic competitiveness and jobs are salvaged in order to quickly recover from the economic crisis,” said Pashinyan.

In response to Pashinyan’s explanations about the coronavirus crisis, Sarkissian said the two were on the same page about the approaches needed to contain the spread of the virus.

“Even if we do not have new infections or deaths tomorrow, we must be very careful. In no way can we declare our country to be free of the coronavirus,” said Sarkissian, touching on the travel restriction imposed by Armenia after due COVID-19.

“Should even a single person coming from abroad be infected, then this process will start again. I hope that even if there is a second wave, we will be able to overcome it, since we already have the necessary experience,” said Sarkissian.

The president pointed out that certain sectors of the economy will suffer greater losses due to the pandemic. Saying he was happy that the government had implemented certain programs, state and government backing would be needed to combat the economic effects of the pandemic.

“I think that these steps should continue, because it will take a long time to overcome the current situation, which has not only an economic dimension, but a social component as well. There are problems with jobs, which in turn can trigger demographic problems,” said Sarkissian adding that people who used to work outside Armenia for many years are unable to do so now.

“Many people who had a jobs yesterday or the day before, do not have them today. Therefore, we must mobilize all our potential to solve these problems,” advised the president who also reaffirmed his personal commitment to addressing these concerns.

Asbarez: Yerevan Blasts Ankara Over Sèvres Treaty Remarks

August 12,  2020


Representatives of the Ottoman Empire sign the Treaty of Sèvres on August 10, 1920

Official Yerevan blasted Ankara for a statement its foreign ministry issued regarding the marking of the 100th anniversary of the Treaty of Sèvres on Monday, saying Turkey, once again, has demonstrated its inability to face its past.

Armenia’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Anna Naghdalyan asserted that “the Treaty of Sèvres has been and will remain a historical fact, which cannot be edited or wiped away.”

Turkey’s statement was especially belligerent and accused Armenia of having “sneaky goals” in marking the anniversary of the landmark treaty.

“Today, it is absurd that a government, which is unable to feed its own people, dares to bring up the Treaty of Sèvres which the Turkish nation overturned 100 years ago,” said the Turkish Foreign Ministry.

“Those who have the idea of achieving ‘sneaky goals’ should know that they will fail against Turkey’s determination to maintain its survival and national existence,” added the Ankara.

“The lesson given by the noble Turkish nation to those who dare to invade Anatolia and the heavy blow it dealt on imperialism is taught as lessons in history books. This glorious struggle has set an example for other oppressed nations,” added the Turkish foreign ministry.

Yerevan countered by saying: “Surprisingly, the current authorities of Turkey, who never miss an opportunity to praise their Ottoman heritage, are nervously reacting to the reference of the Treaty of Sèvres which the very Ottoman Empire signed with a number of states including the Republic of Armenia.”

“While refusing to face its past and urging others to ‘take lessons from history instead of animosity,’ Turkey continues its traditional policy of justifying the Armenian Genocide and threatening the Armenian people with new atrocities,” said Naghdalyan in her response.

“Turkey’s steps toward undermining the peace and security in our region and its military posturing against Armenia are part of the expansionist policy of the Turkish government which is aimed at destabilizing its neighboring regions,” added Naghdalyan.

Only the reconsideration of such policy and the capacity to face the past by Turkey will pave a way for genuine reconciliation between the peoples in our region,” concluded the foreign ministry spokesperson.

Asbarez: Bourdj Hammoud Is Me, Beirut Is You, Lebanese-Armenians Are Us

August 12,  2020


The author, Garo Ghazarian, pictured in Bourdj Hammoud

BY GARO B. GHAZARIAN, ESQ.

By mere  fortuitousness, I find myself in Los Angeles, where though I live without the challenges of those I’ve left behind 42 years ago, it is not lost on me, and it can not really be lost on anyone, that wherever we have ended up, anywhere we live that is not Armenia, it is so, as a direct consequence of the Armenian Genocide.

When you say to yourself, I live in LA, but I once lived in Beirut, and, “but for” my parents and their parents not having ended up in Beirut, I very well could be among those who live in and make up the Armenian Community of Lebanon, then and only then does it become crystal clear why it is imperative to rally everyone around you to donate to #HyeAidLebanon.

Yes, I no longer live there. But what would I have been hoping for if, JUST IF, as fate would have had it, I lived there today, on August 3 or 4, or this week, or more to the point, after the catastrophic explosion at the Port of Beirut.

While I spent my early years in the United States pondering why is it that I was the unlucky one to no longer be living in the midst of the warmest and fiercest Diasporan Armenian Community, I find myself this August, 42 years since the August which saw me leave the only place I had known as home—Bourdj Hammoud—pondering over and over again, why have I since 1978, no longer am physically there while others continue to live there?

They could’ve been me.  But, they are not.  I am not in their midst.  Yet, I am one of them.  I AM them.  And one thing has been beyond certain to me from early on in life.  Some call it street smarts.  I call it “Armenian survival instincts.”  If we do not help ourselves, if we do not stand up for our own, and fight for and beyond our mere survival, no one else will.

Today, more than ever before we must empower one another to rise fiercely for ourselves, by donating to “HyeAidLebanon,” a Pan Armenian Council of Western United States initiative to provide assistance to the Armenians in Lebanon.  After all, who are we, and what’s in a name?  Frankly, everything!

Say our name.  Call me Bourdj Hammoud because I have never stopped really seeing my true self and feeling the most comfortable in my skin more so than when I am in Bourdj Hammoud.

Bourdj Hammoud is me.  Beirut is you. And, the Lebanese-Armenians are us.

Donate today and let’s give them hope.