Soldier in Iconic Photo Killed on Artsakh Frontline

October 8,  2020



The photo of Artsakh soldier Albert Hovhannisyan became an iconic image of the current war

The photo of Armenian artilleryman Albert Hovhannisyan fighting on the frontlines of Artsakh immediately became an iconic image used by hundreds of media outlets around the world covering the most recent attacks by Azerbaijan on Artsakh.

Hohannisyan died on the battlefield joining the roster of our fallen heroes who gave their lives protecting our homeland and our nation.

Honhannisyan’s father, Artak, broke the news in a heartfelt Facebook post on Thursday, saying his son, Albert, “stepped into immortality.”

“My son, Albert Hovhannisyan, whose photo became widespread all over the world these days, stepped into immortality. My pain and the pain of my family is indescribable,” Artak Hovhannisyan wrote on Facebook.

“My grief is heavy, but I am even more proud to be the father of a patriotic Armenian, a real modern-day Hero. I realize that my Albert is not only my Hero, he is the Hero of all of us, he is the example of the Hero Armenian of present and future generations, who followed the path of his heroic ancestors and became immortal,” Hovhannisyan wrote.

The photo, which was distributed on September 29 by Armenia’s Ministry of Defense, has been published by media outlets around the world.

Iran on edge as Azeri minority backs Karabakh war

Asia Times
By Kourosh Ziabari
October 8, 2020 
Ethnic Azerbaijanis who make up 25% of Iran's population are now
calling for the 'liberation of Karabakh'
RASHT – Tensions flaring up between the Republic of Azerbaijan and
Armenia over the intractable Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, deemed to be
Europe’s oldest “frozen war,” have spilled over into the neighboring
Iran, which shares borders and longstanding amicable relations with
both nations.
When the exchange of fire started on September 27 to reignite a
three-decade-old battle on the sovereignty of a mountainous enclave
both Azerbaijan and Armenia claim to be part of their territory, it
was scarcely expected that the skirmish involving two Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe member states would degenerate into
ethnic chaos in Iran, which has mostly been preoccupied with its own
economic pains and global isolation.
But Iran, home to nearly 20 million ethnic Azeris and about 200,000
Armenians, has been shaken by the repercussions of the tussle in South
Caucuses and appears to be prodded into taking sides, rowing back from
an initial position of neutrality.
Ali Rabiei, the spokesperson for the government of Iran, said in a
press conference on Tuesday that the official stance of Iran is that
Armenia should evacuate the “occupied regions of the Republic of
Azerbaijan,” respect its sovereignty and uphold the United Nations
Charter.
In recent days, widespread protests broke out in some of Iran’s major
Azeri-speaking cities including Tabriz, Urmia, Ardabil and Zanjan.
Demonstrators called for the “liberation of Karabakh” and voiced anger
at rumors that the Islamic Republic had dispatched truckloads of
military aid to Armenia.
According to some accounts, 60 people have been arrested in these cities.
Racially-charged slogans
The demonstrations also became a venue for the expression of
racially-charged and secessionist sentiments, with some participants
chanting slogans decrying Iran’s Persian-speaking majority and other
ethnic communities as the nemesis of the Azeri people.
In one instance, large groups of protesters in Tabriz chanted “Kurds,
Persians and Armenians are the enemies of Azerbaijan.”
In a rare move, widely criticized by Iran’s pro-reform newspapers and
social media users, representatives of the Supreme Leader in four
Azeri-speaking provinces unconditionally threw their weight behind the
Republic of Azerbaijan. They emphasized in a joint statement that
“there is no doubt that Karabakh belongs to Azerbaijan, that it is
being occupied and that these territories need to be returned to
Azerbaijan.”
The four influential clerics – Seyed Mohammad Ali Al-e Hashem, Seyed
Hassan Ameli, Ali Khatami and Seyed Mehdi Ghoreishi – attributed their
decision to issue the statement to the verses of the Quran and the
“philosophy of Islamic Republic” necessitating the “protection of the
oppressed.”
They also called those Azerbaijani troops and civilians killed in the
clashes “martyrs.”
Shargh, a major reformist newspaper, warned that the clerics having a
political axe to grind in a dispute which is the jurisdiction of
Iran’s foreign ministry will “undermine the position of the
administration to further the role of an intermediary” between
Azerbaijan and Armenia, while giving a pretext to ethnic extremists to
stoke sectarianism.
Many Iranians have been posting patriotic comments on social media
since then, in reaction to what they perceive to be machinations to
put Iran’s independence and territorial integrity in jeopardy.
Iran’s Azeris
Iran’s Azeris, represented in high political offices, large businesses
and key economic and social sectors, share cross-border cultural ties
with the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey, intermarry with families
in the region, travel to the two countries frequently, watch Azeri and
Turkish movies on satellite TV and some view themselves as successors
of a historic Ottoman civilization.
In extreme cases, fans of Iran’s football clubs from Azeri-speaking
cities have been seen carrying the flags of Azerbaijan and Turkey to
the stadiums, to the chagrin of authorities in Tehran.
This latent Azeri Turkic nationalism has at times unsettled the
Islamic Republic leadership that has been struggling for some 40 years
to preserve the territorial integrity of a multi-ethnic country in
which minorities of Azeris, Arabs, Kurds, Lurs, Turkmens, Balochs,
Armenians and Gilaks make up more than half the population.
Emil Aslan, a researcher at the Institute of International Relations
in Prague, says Iran’s Azerbaijanis have become increasingly exposed
to ethnic nationalism over the past two decades, and it is against
this backdrop that they are wading into the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,
which to them is a largely symbolic cause.
“Available evidence suggests that a significant portion of Iran’s
urban Azerbaijani community has come to politically side with
Azerbaijan in a nationwide process of return to ethnic roots,” he
said.
“For youth that are more educated, secular and hedge against
increasingly strong Persian nationalism, Karabakh has become a
cornerstone of their Turkic Azerbaijani nationalism, partly due to
their larger exposition to Azerbaijani and Turkish media,” he told
Asia Times.
Yet Aslan believes a predisposition to independence from Iran or
annexation with either Azerbaijan or Turkey is quite uncommon among
Iran’s Azeris, even though nationalistic tendencies are markedly
powerful.
“My experience from fieldwork in Iran’s Azerbaijan (community)
suggests that even in the midst of nationalist urban youth, the
attitudes toward the idea of Iranian statehood are quite strong, with
only a minority, albeit vocal, being in favor of attaining
independence from Iran,” he said.
“Most wish to coexist with Persians, which is particularly the case
amid more religiously-minded Azerbaijanis, who equate Shiite Islam
with Iranian statehood,” he said.
Professor Brenda Shaffer, a foreign policy specialist and faculty
member of the US Naval Postgraduate School, echoed those views, ruling
out the unification of Iran’s Azeri-speaking provinces with Azerbaijan
or Turkey as a possibility.
“While Turkey and Azerbaijan, especially through their TV broadcasts
widely viewed among the Azerbaijanis in Iran, are important cultural
magnets, I don’t see any meaningful interest of unification with
either among the Azerbaijanis in Iran,” she said.
“In parallel, Turkey and the Republic of Azerbaijan are interested in
the welfare and fulfillment of rights of the Azerbaijanis in Iran, but
neither seeks a change in Iran’s borders nor to incorporate the
territories populated by the Azerbaijani group,” she told Asia Times.
Warning the neighbors
But while separatist attitudes might be inconsequential, there are
media and political elites in the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey
who refer to Iran’s Azeri-speaking provinces as “South Azerbaijan,”
holding conferences and events in Baku and Istanbul from time to time
advocating the separation of these provinces, featuring speakers from
Iran and elsewhere.
The Southern Azerbaijan National Awakening Movement, based in Baku,
was founded in 2002 and claims to represent the interests of Iran’s
Azeris, seeking to unify Azerbaijanis “living on both sides of the
Aras river.”
Iran’s Azeris also have their own grievances. They complain about
being sometimes belittled by the national media, being the target of
racist jokes and not being entitled to use their language for
education in schools and universities.
Shaffer believes these grievances and the simmering Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict will not pit Iran’s ethnic groups against each other, even
though Tehran’s policies with each of its neighbors can have domestic
implications since the country’s ethnic minorities mostly reside in
border provinces.
“The Azerbaijani community numbers approximately 28 million, while the
Armenians number close to 200,000. In Tabriz, which is an almost all
Azerbaijani city, there is an Armenian community and the leaders of
the protest movement in Tabriz have openly stated that they want no
harm to come to this community,” she told Asia Times.
It is difficult to predict the outcome of the Nagorno-Karabakh
dispute, especially given that Turkey is openly backing Azerbaijan,
and major powers such as Russia and France may also wade in with
conflicting interests.
Yet Tehran’s role in the fighting may become more explicit with time
as it works to moderate the tensions raging in close proximity to its
borders.
Several rockets and some shelling have been reported to have
inadvertently hit Iranian soil since fighting broke out between
Azerbaijan and Armenia. At least 20 mortar shells have landed in
villages of the border city of Aslan Duz in Ardabil Province, while
three rockets have fallen inside the villages of Khoda Afarin County,
injuring a six-year-old child.
Iran’s Defense Minister Amir Hatami stated these mistaken firings are
not acceptable and that “necessary and serious warning” was given to
both countries to ensure Iran’s territory is not encroached on while
they fight.
 

A tour of Transcaucasia’s troubles

Asia Times
By MK Bhadrakumar
October 7, 2020
Nagorno-Karabakh's explosion of hostilities is much more than a
Turkish-Russian clash of wills
[The following is the first installment in a three-part series on the
regional power dynamics that produced the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh
and the diplomatic efforts to contain it.]
Early into the renewed conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh in the
Transcaucasian region – also known as South Caucasus – it is becoming
clear that the binary narrative dished out by Western commentators of
this being a Turkish-Russian clash of wills and strategies is either
simply naive or purposively deceptive.
The point is, Russia and Turkey – and Iran in a somewhat supportive
role – are already proactively talking of negotiations involving the
warring sides.
September 30 was a turning point of sorts. Tehran had on the previous
day called on Azerbaijan and Armenia to settle their differences
peacefully and offered that along with Turkey and Russia, it could
help the two countries to resolve their dispute.
President Hassan Rouhani repeated this offer in a phone conversation
with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. According to the Iranian
account, Pashinyan responded positively that “any tension and conflict
would be to the detriment of all countries in the region and welcomed
any practical initiative to stop the violence.”
Armenia is a landlocked country and it depends on Iran to provide a
vital transportation route to the outside world. On its part, Tehran
kept up a warm relationship with Armenia – although its rival
Azerbaijan is a Muslim country – even supplying it with natural gas.
Tehran stuck to the friendly track even after the “color revolution”
in Armenia in 2018 and Pashinyan’s steady gravitation to the American
camp in the subsequent period, while also remaining a member of the
Moscow-led Collective Security Treaty Organization.
Iran has profound security concerns over Pashinyan’s recent diplomatic
exchanges with Israel – at the initiative of the White House – which
of course has brought the famed Israeli intelligence apparatus Mossad
right on to Iran’s northern borders, in addition to the potential
Mossad presence in the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Oman on
Iran’s southern flank.
Turkey too has reason to be concerned over Israel’s activities in
Transcaucasia. Israel is virtually piggy-backing on the US-sponsored
color revolutions in Transcaucasia. After the US-sponsored color
revolution in Georgia in 2003, Israel overnight made its appearance in
Tbilisi. And the Israel-Georgia ties have since become very close.
Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu (R) is being welcomed by
officials upon his arrival at an airport in Baku, Azerbaijan, on
October 06, 2020. Photo: AFP/Resul Rehimov/Anadolu Agency
Despite the failure of the color revolution in Azerbaijan in mid-2005
and the sporadic attempts since then, Israel has developed close
“security cooperation” with that country.
Further north, Israel has developed special relations with Ukraine,
another progeny of the color revolution, which also has a president
who is an ethnic Jew who is actively involved also in the ongoing
color revolution in Belarus.
(The strange part is that notwithstanding the company that Israel
keeps in the Black Sea region, which is virulently anti-Russian, it
still enjoys exceptionally close ties with Russia.)
Both Turkey and Iran understand perfectly well why Israel attributes
such excessive importance to the three small countries of
Transcaucasia – total population 11 million – to establish a security
presence in that region with a view to create a “second front” against
its regional enemies – Ankara and Tehran.
(Israel has a record of links with Kurdish separatist groups too who
have ethnic links with Transcaucasia.)
Iran openly voiced its disquiet over Pashinyan’s decision to open
Armenia’s embassy in Israel, which in turn inspired then-US national
security adviser John Bolton to travel all the way to Yerevan, where
he openly took aim at Iran – and Russia. By the way, the Armenian
diaspora in the US is an influential constituency that Pashinyan
cannot ignore, either.
At any rate, demonstrations broke out in front of the Armenian Embassy
in Tehran soon after and senior Iranian officials cautioned Pashinyan.
An Iranian commentary remarked: “Tehran’s considerations … must be
taken into account.… On the other hand, Russia will undoubtedly oppose
the idea of using Armenia to promote security and economic influence.
It had already severely criticized Israel’s arms deal with Georgia and
the Republic of Azerbaijan.”
Clearly, Western analysts are obfuscating the US-Israeli nexus at work
in Transcaucasia. Both Ankara and Tehran have cause to worry that the
US might be the Israeli proxy in the Transcaucasia region – as has
been the case in the Middle East for decades – to weaken and roll back
the rising aspirations of the two regional powers.
Turkey-Iran axis in the making
With the destruction of Iraq and Syria and the weakening of Egypt,
Turkey (under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan) and Iran are the only
two authentic regional powers left standing in the Muslim Middle East
to defy the US regional strategies and to challenge Israel’s military
pre-eminence.
Significantly, the surge of the US-Israeli nexus in Transcaucasia
comes in the wake of the recent US-sponsored “peace agreements”
between Israel and three Gulf Arab states (the United Arab Emirates,
Bahrain and Oman). Indeed, both Turkey and Iran have reacted strongly
to the development in the Persian Gulf region.
Just this week, the chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces,
Major-General Mohammad Hossein Baqeri, explicitly warned the UAE that
Tehran would view that country as an “enemy” and act accordingly if
Abu Dhabi allowed any Israeli security presence on its soil.
Within a month of the Israel-UAE agreement, Erdogan held a
videoconference with Rouhani where he made a big opening statement
that “Turkey and Iran dialogue has a decisive role in the solution of
many regional problems. I believe that our cooperation will return to
its previous levels as the pandemic conditions alleviate.”
Rouhani responded that Turkish-Iranian relations are built on solid
foundations throughout history and the border between the two
“friendly and brotherly countries” has always been “the borders of
peace and friendship.” He stated that especially in the past seven
years, both governments had made great efforts based on bilateral,
regional and international cooperation.
Significantly, Rouhani added that the two countries are located in a
“sensitive region” of the Middle East and they are “the two great
powers of the region. There was hostility and vindictiveness towards
both countries. It also exists today. There is no way to be successful
against such conspiracies other than by reinforcing friendly relations
between the two countries.”
Sure enough, Israel has taken note of the nascent Turkey-Iran axis,
which also includes Qatar. A commentary in The Jerusalem Post noted
that in recent years Turkish-Iranian ties have “grown closer due to
joint opposition to the US and also Israel. Iran and Turkey both back
Hamas, for instance.” It wryly observed that the Middle Eastern
geopolitics built around the Shia-Sunni sectarian strife may have
outlived its utility.
Again, the Turkish state news agency Anadolu featured a commentary
last week titled New strategic design of Middle East, which pointed
out that the peace agreements in the Gulf bring out the schism between
the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain on one side and Qatar and Kuwait on
the other side. (Qatar is an ally of Turkey while Kuwait has friendly
ties with Iran.)
The commentary noted: “Arab countries seem to have lost both
confidence and a sense of unity; when the sense of confidence is
seriously damaged, it will be easier to put them at odds, and this
regional division, as everywhere, makes Arab countries and their
leaders dependent on external forces for their security and
existence.”
The Anadolu commentary then warmed up to its main theme, that the
so-called “normalization” agreement between the UAE and Israel “may be
a veiled effort not only to expand the imperial space but also to form
a bloc against Iran and Turkey in the Middle East.”
“Iran is a non-Arab country and seems an arch-enemy of the US and
Israel; Iran collaborates with Russia and China, the US’s arch-rivals,
and sometimes with Turkey, which may threaten both the US imperial
interest and Israeli security in the region. Hence Iran’s regional
power and influence should be jettisoned and driven into a corner.
“Turkey is a NATO country and seems a close US ally, [but] US policy
towards Turkey in the region is ambivalent, unclear, and elusive in
the sense that the US still continues to support the [Kurdish] YPG/PKK
terrorist group in Syria that has been carrying out terrorist acts
against Turkey and killing civilians for decades.
“Moreover, the US and Israel, though they seem friendly, do not want a
strong Turkey because a strong Turkey may influence Arab countries
particularly using Islam and then turn them against the exploitation
of the Middle East and its oil and resources by neo-imperial powers,
yet the US and other imperial power will never allow Turkey to easily
stand on its feet in the region.
“What they may prefer is that a weak and fragile Turkey, grappling
with its internal conflicts, will always serve their purpose.”
In the chronicles of the great game, seldom it is that the
protagonists speak up and opt for public diplomacy. The game,
historically, is played out quietly in the shade outside the pale of
public view. Turkey and Iran have decided otherwise.
Can it be a mere coincidence that the conflict in Transcaucasia, a
faraway region that borders both Turkey and Iran where Israel is
consolidating a security presence against them, erupted in such a
backdrop of new alignment that promises to redraw the geopolitics of
the Middle East?
M K Bhadrakumar is a former Indian diplomat.
 

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 10/08/2020

                                        Thursday, October 8, 2020
Putin Pushes For End To Karabakh Fighting
RUSSIA -- Russian President Vladimir Putin addresses participants of the 7th 
Forum of the Regions of Russia and Belarus via video feed at the Novo-Ogaryovo 
state residence, outside Moscow, September 29, 2020
After what the Kremlin described as a series of phone calls with the leaders of 
Armenia and Azerbaijan, Russian President Vladimir Putin urged the warring sides 
in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict on Thursday night to stop hostilities.
In a written statement, Putin said they should do so “for humanitarian 
considerations with the aim of exchanging prisoners and the bodies of dead 
soldiers.”
“The foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan are invited to Moscow on 
October 9 for holding consultations on these issues mediated by the Russian 
Foreign Minister [Sergei Lavrov,]” concluded the statement.
Yerevan and Baku did not immediately react to the extraordinary appeal.
The Armenian Foreign Ministry said earlier on Thursday that face-to-face talks 
between Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanian and his Azerbaijani counterpart 
Jeyhun Bayramov are “not yet planned in any format.”
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova announced afterwards that 
Lavrov has offered to host a trilateral meeting with Mnatsakanian and Bayramov. 
She said the Russian, U.S. and French mediators co-heading the OSCE Minsk Group 
would also be in attendance.
“We are holding consultations with the parties regarding possible dates for the 
start of negotiations in this format,” Zakharova told journalists.
Putin issued his statement a few hours later.
Mnatsakanian was scheduled to travel to Moscow for an official visit on Monday. 
For his part, Bayramov was due to meet with the Minsk Group co-chairs in Geneva 
on Thursday.
The three world powers leading the group have persistently pressed the parties 
to restore a ceasefire regime since the large-scale hostilities in the Karabakh 
conflict zone broke out on September 27. Unlike Azerbaijan, Armenia has backed 
their calls for an unconditional halt to the fighting that has left hundreds of 
soldiers dead.
As recently as on Wednesday, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev continued to 
make the ceasefire conditional on Armenia presenting a “timetable for 
withdrawing its troops from the occupied territories.” Yerevan has rejected this 
precondition.
Another Journalist Wounded In Karabakh
NAGORNO-KARABAKH -- A photo shows damage to Ghazanchetsots church caused by 
shelling, October 8, 2020
A Russian journalist was gravely wounded on Thursday during a reported 
Azerbaijani missile strike on Nagorno-Karabakh’s largest Armenian church.
News reports from Karabakh said the Holy Savior Cathedral located in the town of 
Shushi (Shusha) was twice hit by rockets and seriously damaged as a result. 
Photographs taken at the scene showed a gaping hole on the roof of the church 
and debris scattered inside it.
Karabakh officials said Yuri Kotenok, who writes for the Segodnia.ru news 
service, was wounded as he inspected, together with another Russian reporter, 
damage caused to the church by the first missile strike.
The Nagorno-Karabakh Information Center said Kotenok was rushed to a hospital in 
Stepanakert and was undergoing surgery there in the evening. “Karabakh doctors 
are fighting to save his life,” it said in a statement.
The RIA Novosti news agency reported that the other journalist, identified as 
Levon Arzanov, and his Armenian companion suffered light injuries during the 
shelling of the 19th century church commonly known as Ghazanchetsots.
The Armenian Foreign Ministry condemned the shelling as a “war crime.” “With 
these actions Azerbaijan replicates the behavior of its newly acquired allies, 
infamous international terrorist organizations that are responsible for the 
destruction of numerous historical-cultural monuments in the Middle East,” it 
charged in a statement.
The Azerbaijani Defense Ministry claimed that its forces did not deliberately 
target the church.
Shushi, Stepanakert and other Karabakh towns have been heavily shelled since the 
outbreak on September 27 of large-scale hostilities along the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani “line of contact” around Karabakh.
Two French journalists working for Le Monde daily came under artillery fire and 
were wounded in one of those towns, Martuni, on October 2. One of them underwent 
life-saving surgery in Stepanakert.
Baku has also reported extensive Armenian shelling of Azerbaijani towns and 
villages which it said continued on Thursday.
Russian-Led Military Bloc Also Sees Foreign ‘Mercenaries’ In Karabakh War
        • Armen Koloyan
Armenia - Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian meets with CSTO Secretary General 
Stanislav Zas, February 28, 2020
The head of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) expressed concern 
on Thursday about the alleged participation of Syrian mercenaries in hostilities 
around Nagorno-Karabakh, saying that it poses a “challenge” to the Russian-led 
military alliance.
“It’s hard for me now to judge the scale and organization of militants’ transfer 
to the Karabakh conflict zone,” CSTO Secretary General Stanislav Zas told RT. 
“In all likelihood, it is the case, and militants and mercenaries emerge there.”
“Of course it does not help to normalize relations. It poses a certain challenge 
to the organization,” Zas said in remarks cited by the TASS news agency.
Russia last week implicitly accused Turkey of sending “terrorists and 
mercenaries” from Syria and Libya to fight in Karabakh on Azerbaijan’s side. It 
demanded their immediate withdrawal from the region.
The Russian foreign intelligence chief, Sergei Naryshkin, warned on Tuesday that 
the region could become a “launch pad” for Islamist militants to enter Russia.
French President Emmanuel Macron has also said that at least 300 “Syrian 
fighters from jihadist groups” were flown from Turkey to Azerbaijan ahead of the 
September 27 outbreak of fighting in Karabakh. Both Ankara and Baku strongly 
deny that.
The CSTO comprises Russia, Armenia, Belarus and three other ex-Soviet states. 
Zas said the bloc could intervene in the Karabakh conflict if Armenia’s 
sovereignty is threatened.
Russian President Vladimir Putin stressed on Wednesday that the CSTO statutes 
commit Moscow to defending Armenia against foreign aggression. “We have always 
fulfilled, are fulfilling and will fulfill our obligations,” he said in his 
first public comments on the Karabakh hostilities.
Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov noted afterwards that these “CSTO obligations do 
not extend to Karabakh.”
Armenian Security Chief Sacked
Armenia - Argishti Kyaramian, April 3, 2019
The director of Armenia’s National Security Service (NSS), Argishti Kyaramian, 
was sacked on Thursday after only four months in office.
President Armen Sarkissian relieved Kyaramian of his duties in a decree 
initiated by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian. The latter did not immediately make 
any statements on the development.
The 29-year-old Kyaramian headed an anti-corruption government body before being 
appointed as NSS director in June. He had never worked in Armenia’s most 
powerful security service before.
Kyaramian’s temporary replacement, Mikael Hambardzumian, is a long-serving NSS 
officer.
Hambardzumian is the fourth head of the former Armenian branch of the Soviet KGB 
appointed, albeit in an acting capacity, since Pashinian came to power in the 
2018 “Velvet Revolution.”
Artur Vanetsian, one of the former NSS chiefs fired last year, is now a bitter 
political opponent of Pashinian. Vanetsian set up an opposition party early this 
year.
More Fighting, Shelling In Karabakh Conflict Zone
        • Naira Nalbandian
Nagorno Karabakh - The Ghazanchetsots Cathedral in Shushi damaged by 
shelling,October 8, 2020
Nagorno-Karabakh towns again came under rocket fire on Thursday as heavy 
fighting continued in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict zone for a twelfth day.
The shelling by Azerbaijani forces of the Karabakh capital Stepanakert resumed 
late on Wednesday and continued periodically until the next morning. The city’s 
remaining residents mostly hiding in bomb shelters could hear powerful 
explosions and the sound of air raid sirens during the night.
One local man examined afterwards the damage to his home caused by recent day’s 
artillery fire. “No one is staying home,” he told RFE/RL’s Armenian service. “So 
they shouldn’t try in vain to kill us.”
“My sons are on the frontline,” he added. “They say that everything will be 
alright.”
Another Stepanakert resident said he is still not planning to take refuge in 
Armenia. “Either we should die or live on our land,” said the middle-aged man.
NAGORNO-KARABAKH -- A view shows a house damaged by recent shelling in 
Stepanakert, October 8, 2020.
The Azerbaijani army shelled the nearby town of Shushi (Shusha) and seriously 
damaged its famous Armenian cathedral in the afternoon. Photographs taken at the 
scene and posted on social media showed a gaping hole on the Ghazanchetsots 
church’s roof and debris scattered inside it.
According to officials in Stepanakert, 19 civilian residents of Karabakh have 
been killed and 80 others wounded since the September 27 outbreak of large-scale 
hostilities along the “line of contact” around Karabakh. The fighting has also 
left two residents of Armenian villages close to the Azerbaijani border dead.
Azerbaijani authorities reported, meanwhile, continued Armenian shelling of 
Azerbaijani towns and villages close to the frontlines, saying that the death 
toll among their residents rose to 31. They said one of those towns, Barda, was 
hit particularly hard on Thursday.
AZERBAIJAN -- Police block the area around destroyed cars and buildings, 
following a missile attack by Armenian forces, in the city of Barda, October 8, 
2020
There were no signs of imminent end to the worst hostilities in the Karabakh 
conflict zone since 1994. According to the Armenian Defense Ministry, the 
southern sections of the “line of contact” adjacent to Iran remained the 
epicenter of the deadly fighting.
A ministry spokeswoman said Karabakh Armenian forces repelled at least two 
attacks launched by Azerbaijani troops deployed in that area. The latter 
suffered “substantial losses,” she said.
There was no immediate reaction to those statements from the Azerbaijani side. 
The Defense Ministry in Baku said only that Armenian-backed forces had shelled 
several Azerbaijani villages overnight, causing casualties. It said Azerbaijani 
forces are "taking adequate measures."
Also, the Karabakh army publicized on Thursday the names of 30 more of its 
soldiers killed in action since September 27. The total number of confirmed 
Armenian combat deaths thus reached 350.
The Azerbaijani army still not released its casualty figures.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

CSTO to intervene if Armenia gets attacked, affirms Secretary General of 6-nation security bloc

Save

Share

 17:59, 8 October, 2020

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 8, ARMENPRESS. The Collective Security Treaty Organization, which Armenia is a member of, will provide Armenia with military assistance in case of a real threat to the country’s territorial integrity, the 6-member security bloc’s Secretary General Stanislav Zas said.

“When real threats are created for any CSTO member country’s security, stability, sovereignty and territorial integrity, then this country is entitled to apply to the CSTO, the inter-state, including emergency consultations mechanisms are activated and the necessary help or assistance is provided to that country in accordance to its request,” he said.

He said the other situation for it to intervene is an aggression, that is a military attack. Zas said an aggression on one member state of the CSTO is considered to be an attack on all members, and in this case based on the application of the country that is under attack the CSTO is providing any kind of assistance, including military.

“In such cases the CSTO response regime is initiated,” he said.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Dutch parliament adopts resolution condemning Turkey’s militaristic rhetoric

Save

Share

 18:16, 8 October, 2020

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 8, ARMENPRESS. The parliament of the Netherlands has adopted a resolution, urging the Government to condemn Turkey’s militaristic rhetoric that supports Azerbaijan fighting against Artsakh, ARMENPRESS reports the resolution was initiated by Sadet Karabulut, member of the Social Party of the Netherlands.

Given that the military operations have again flared up with great intensity in Nagorno Karabakh and that Turkey encourages Azerbaijan with its militaristic rhetoric to continue the war, the parliament urges the Government to condemn Turkey’s militaristic rhetoric and call on Turkey in the sidelines of the EU to make efforts for ceasefire and negotiations.

Azerbaijan, backed by Turkey , unleashed war against Artsakh on September 27. Turkey, in addition to various types of assistance to Azerbaijan, including using Turkish air force against Artsakh and Armenia, has also deployed thousands of mercenaries and terrorists from Syria in Azerbaijan to fight against Artsakh.

So far the Armenian side has reported 320 casualties among the military and 21 civilians, Azerbaijan’s manpower losses are nearly 4000, which includes both servicemen from the regular Azerbaijani army and terrorists.

President of Artsakh Arayik Harutyunyan called for an new coalition against international terrorism on October 6.

The Armenian side has reported 350 military casualties and 21 civilians. Azerbaijan’s manpower losses is over 4.000, which includes both regular army servicemen and jihadist terrorists.

Editing and translating by Tigran Sirekanyan

Moscow ready to host possible meeting between FMs of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia

Save

Share

 18:34, 8 October, 2020

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 8, ARMENPRESS. Russia holds consultations over organizing the possible meeting between Armenian and Russian FMs in Moscow, Official representative of the Russian MFA Maria Zakharova said in a briefing on October 8.

She noted that Russia actively continues mediations efforts for an immediate cessation of fire in Nagorno Karabakh conflict zone and resumption of peace process both at the national level and in the sidelines of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairmanship.

Reminding of the statement of the Presidents of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chair countries, Zakharova said, ‘’Different action plans are being developed, one of which is that our side has offered to provide the platform of Moscow for a meeting between the Foreign Ministers of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan with the participation of the Minsk Group Co-chairs. Consultations over the time for the possible meeting are underway’’, Zakharova said.

Foreign Minister of Armenia Zohrab Mnatsakanyan will pay an official visit to Russia on October 12.

Editing and translating by Tigran Sirekanyan

Azerbaijan no longer can make decisions over its fate, it’s Turkey who decides.

From now on Turkey decides Azerbaijan’s fate – PM Pashinyan

Save

Share

 18:40, 8 October, 2020

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 8, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan gave an interview to German ‘’Spiegel’’. ARMENPRESS reports Pashinyan stated that Armenia sees a task for Turkey to swallow Azerbaijan, and

Question – In fact, you claim that Turkey is not interested in the territory of Nagorno Karabakh, it just aims to create a corridor through the Armenian territory.

Answer – Yes, and we see Turkey is solving the task of swallowing the Azerbaijani state. From now on, it’s not Azerbaijan that decides its own fate, but Turkey does it.

Targeting religious worship sites and cultural monuments is war crime – MFA Armenia

Save

Share

 19:20, 8 October, 2020

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 8, ARMENPRESS. The Foreign Ministry of Armenia ahs issued a statement regarding the Azerbaijani regular bombing of Ghazanchetsots Cathedral in Shushi town of Artsakh. As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the MFA Armenia, the statement runs as follows,

‘’On October 8, the armed forces of Azerbaijan launched airstrikes at the masterpiece of the Armenian architecture – the  Ghazanchetsots Cathedral located in the cultural capital of Artsakh, Shushi, causing significant damages.

This is another crime of the military-political leadership of Azerbaijan, which reveals its inhuman essence. Nevertheless, this action fully fits into its policy of Armenophobia developed for decades. Azerbaijan, which has completely annihilated the Armenian cultural heritage in Nakhichevan and in other parts of the historical homeland of the Armenian people, now throughout the ongoing military aggression against Artsakh is trying to deprive Armenians of Artsakh of their homeland and historical memory.

With these actions Azerbaijan replicates behaviour of its newly acquired allies – the infamous international terrorist organizations, who are responsible for destruction of the numerous historical-cultural monuments in the Middle East. 

We condemn in the strongest way this heinous crime of Azerbaijan is also a challenge to the whole civilized humanity. 

In this regard, we remind the Azerbaijani military-political authorities that targeting religious worship sites and cultural monuments is war crime as enshrined in international humanitarian law, the responsibility for which has no statute of limitations’’.

A number of reporters were injured during the bombing, one of them, a Russian journalist, is in critical situation. Doctors of Artsakh are sparing no efforts to save his life.

Editing and translating by Tigran Sirekanyan