Constructive announcements of Armenian side, PM Pashinyan remain unresponded by Azerbaijan – MFA spokesperson

Constructive announcements of Armenian side, PM Pashinyan remain unresponded by Azerbaijan – MFA spokesperson

Save

Share

16:41, 9 March, 2019

YEREVAN, MARCH 9, ARMENPRESS. Armenia has always voiced about its committment to settle Nagorno Karabakh conflict exclusively peacefuly under the auspices of OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs, where the security and status of Artsakh are priorities, ARMENPRESS reports spokesperson of the Foreign Ministry of Armenia Anna Naghdalyan said in a comment regarding Nagorno Karabakh peace process.

‘In the recent period the announcments made by different Azerbaijani state officials over Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement have significantly toughened. The use of force or the threat to use, military settlement, maximalist and un-constructive announcements are maximally emphasized, which is condemnable. And this is reflected also in the recent statement of the Co-chairs.

We hear from Baku phrases like ‘The factor of force has always been and remains on our agenda’, ‘military factor plays a key role for the conflict settlement’, ‘Right comes from power’ and so on. Moreover, in the light of the announcement about the planned meeting of the leaders of the countries Azerbaijan launches offensive exercises, that have not been notified and are against the international obligations.

Under the conditions that the Prime Minister of Armenia announces at the European Parliament about the necessity to bring the culture of dialogue, tolerance and mutual concessions to our region, we hear threats from Baku threats that they can prepare their public not to peace, but other methods of solving the conflict.

Such rhetoric, as well as maximalist and non-constructive announcements do not foster the creation of appropriate atmosphere for negotiations. Armenia has announced numerous times that it does not succumb to such approaches, as well as to the forceful negotiations under rifles.

Armenia has always voiced about it commitment and support for the exclusively peaceful conflict settlement under the format of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs, where our priorities are the security and status of Artsakh. An excellent example of our commitment for peaceful settlement is that following the velvet revolution in Armenia the peace process did not stop, but obtained a new dynamic.

The establishment of atmosphere of peace, the mechanisms for reducing risks and preventing border incidents and the implementation of confidence-building measures, recorded in Dushanbe, as well as during the Vienna and St. Petersburg summits earlier, remain pivotal’, reads the statement.

Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan




Swedish Parliament Vice Speaker pays tribute at Tsitsernakaberd Armenian Genocide memorial complex

Swedish Parliament Vice Speaker pays tribute at Tsitsernakaberd Armenian Genocide memorial complex

Save

Share

16:48, 9 March, 2019

YEREVAN, MARCH 9, ARMENPRESS. The delegation led by Second Deputy Speaker of the Swedish parliament Lotta Johnsson Fornarve visited Armenian Genocide memorial complex accomponied by Vice Speaker of the Armenian parliament Lena Nazaryan on March 9.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the parliament of Armenia, Lotta Johnsson Fornarve laid a wreath at the monument eternalizing the memory of the Armenian Genocide victims and also put flowers at the Eternal fire, honoring the memory of the sacred victims with silence.

The guests also visited the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, got acquainted with documents proving the tragedy of the Armenian people and made a note in the commemorative book.

The Swedish Parliament Vice Speaker noted that her country’s parliament has recognized the Armenian Genocide, adding, ‘We always remember the great tragedy of Armenians and every year a commemorative event is held at our parliament. This year also a commemorative event dedicated to the Armenian Genocide will take place’.

Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan




Ashot Ghoulian met Dutch MPs

Title: Ashot Ghoulian met Dutch MPs

Federation of Armenian Organisations in The Netherlands (FAON)

Address: Weesperstraat 91 – 2574 VS The Hague, The Netherlands

Website: www.faon.nl

E-mail: [email protected]



Press Release



Chairman of Artsakh Parliament Ashot Ghoulian met Dutch MPs



The Hague, 5 March 2019 – On 5 March 2019 a delegation from Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) with Chairman of National Assembly of Artsakh Mr Ashot Ghoulian and deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Mrs Armine Aleksanyan, together with FAON chairman Mr Mato Hakhverdian and secretary of the FAON Mrs Inge Drost, participated in a Dutch parliament hearing about Artsakh.



At the parliamentary meeting were present also Mrs Irina Beglaryan, Mr Gegham Stepanyan from Artsakh and Mrs Karine Mkrttsjan as translator.



The hearing took place in a so-called “special procedure” of standing committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives of the Netherlands. It was requested in a letter by the Federation of Armenian Organisations in the Netherlands (FAON) to raise awareness for the situation in the Republic of Artsakh. The meeting was organised and chaired by the Member of Parliament Sadet Karabulut (Socialist Party). Dutch parliamentarians of 5 factions were present, among others Mr Joel Voordewind (Christian Union), who is the vice chairman of standing committee on Foreign Affairs.



After warm welcoming words by Mrs Karabulut, Mr Hakhverdian introduced the guests from Artsakh. He referred to earlier occasions, when the Armenian community in the Netherlands brought the situation in Artsakh to the attention of the Dutch Parliament and government in recent years, with the submission of petitions, letters and a special hearing in 2015 with participation of FAON and a delegation of European Friends of Armenia including Armenian MP Mr Tevan Poghosyan.



In his introduction Mr Ghoulian thanked Mrs Karabulut and her colleagues for their interest for Artsakh and presented the current situation in his country and what has led to it in the last 31 years. The Republic of Artsakh is convinced that the solution of the conflict with Azerbaijan can only be reached in a peaceful way. He also gave a brief account of the democratic development in Artsakh. He mentioned that 6 parliamentary and 5 presidential elections have been organised during past 25 years. He invited the Dutch parliamentarians to visit Artsakh, like their colleagues from other European countries.



After Mr Ghoulian’s introduction the Dutch MPs asked questions about the situation in Artsakh and the possible solution of the conflict. Mr Ghoulian answered all questions and talked about the long going peace process led by the co-chairs of OSCE Minsk Group. He explained the obstacles, which exist on the way for a fair solution of the conflict. He also pointed how the Netherlands with its important political and economical possibilities could effectively support the peace process. He spoke about the difficulties that Artsakh is facing for the solution of the economical problems. According to Mr Ghoulian following the recent contacts of new Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashynian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliev the situation at the boarder was relatively calm in the last few months.



The meeting took place in a friendly atmosphere.



On 27 February 2019 the Joint Armenian Organisations in the Netherlands (SAO) commemorated the pogroms of Sumgait by a protest march started from the Hague Peace Palace to the Azerbaijan Embassy with a rally in front the Embassy of Azerbaijan. On the same day the SAO submitted a letter addressed to the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Stef Blok and discussed the situation of Artsakh with director of Europe Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mrs Erica Schouten.


Federation of Dutch Armenian Organizations • FAON


Press release


Meeting of Artsakh Parliament Speaker Ashot Ghulyan with Dutch MPs


The Hague, March 5, 2019. – 2019 On March 5, the Speaker of the National Assembly of the Republic of Artsakh, Mr. Ashot Ghulyan and the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mrs. Armine Aleksanyan, accompanied by the President of the Federation of Dutch Armenian Organizations (FAON), Mr. Mato Hakhverdyan and the Secretary, Ms. Inga Drost, had a meeting with the deputies of the Parliament of the Netherlands to discuss issues related to Artsakh.


Mrs. Irina Beglaryan, Mr. Gegham Stepanyan and translator Mrs. Karine Mkrtchyan were also present at the meeting.


This session was organized within the framework of the so-called “special procedure” of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Dutch Parliament. In order to raise awareness of the situation in Artsakh, the Federation of Dutch Armenian Organizations (FAON) appealed to the parliamentary committee to have a direct hearing with high-ranking representatives of Artsakh. The session was organized and presided over by Ms. Sadet Karabulut (Socialist Party). Deputies from 5 factions of the Dutch Parliament were present, including the vice-chairman of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Joel Vorverndinde (Christian Union).


After Ms. Karabulut’s words of warm welcome, Mato Hakhverdyan introduced the guests of Artsakh to the deputies. He referred to the past relations with the Parliament related to the Artsakh issue, noting that the Dutch-Armenian community has repeatedly appealed to the Parliament of the Netherlands by presenting manifestos and brought the situation of the Artsakh conflict to the attention of the Parliament and the government, and in 2015 At the initiative of the Dutch-Armenian Federation, the Permanent Commissioner of Foreign Affairs of the Parliament listened to the information presented by the European friends of Armenia and RA NA MP Tevan Poghosyan about the Artsakh issue and current problems.


In his introductory speech, Mr. Ghulyan thanked Mrs. Karabulut and her colleagues for showing interest in Artsakh and presented the current situation of the country, as well as the successes achieved in Artsakh over the past 31 years. The Republic of Artsakh is convinced that the solution to the conflict can be achieved only in a peaceful way. He also briefly told about the democratic development process of Artsakh. He mentioned that 6 parliamentary and 5 presidential elections were organized during the last 25 years. He invited the Dutch parliamentarians, following the deputies of other European countries, to visit Artsakh.


After Mr. Ghulyan’s speech, the Dutch deputies asked questions about the situation in Artsakh and possible solutions to the conflict. Mr. Ghulyan answered all the questions and spoke about the long-term peace process led by the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group. He explained the obstacles that exist on the way to a fair resolution of the conflict. He also emphasized that the Netherlands with its important political and economic opportunities can effectively support the peace process. He also referred to the difficulties that exist in solving economic problems in Artsakh. According to Mr. Ghulyan, after several contacts between the new Prime Minister of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan, and the President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, the situation along the line of contact has been relatively calm in the last few months.


The meeting took place in a friendly atmosphere.


2019 on February 27, the Dutch-Armenian cooperating organizations honored the memory of the victims of the Sumgait pogroms, marched in protest from the Peace Palace in The Hague to the Embassy of Azerbaijan, in front of which a rally-demonstration took place. On the same day, Dutch-Armenian cooperating organizations addressed the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, Mr. Steph Blok, with a letter about the Artsakh issue, and discussed the Artsakh situation with the Director of the European Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ms. Erika Schouten.

Azerbaijan’s Folly in Tehran

March 9, 2019

By

David Davidian

The war between Armenia and Azerbaijan reached a peak just after the disintegration of the Soviet Union. In this battle for the sovereignty of the Armenian-majority populated region of Nagorno-Karabakh; many horrors of war occurred. One of those events happened in the town of Khojaly. Since late February 1992 Azerbaijanis refer to events in Khojaly as “genocide.”  Events in Khojaly were staged by leaders in Baku with Azerbaijani civilians as the first casualty. The truth was the second casualty. Today, the deaths of these civilians are used as a propaganda tool by the leaders of Azerbaijan.

Last week in the Iranian capital, Tehran, on the twenty-seventh anniversary of events in Khojaly, the Azerbaijani embassy held a photo exhibition. Not only were the events in Khojaly not genocidal but Azerbaijan again exhibited supposedly eye-witness photographs depicting acts of barbaric proportion that took place in Khojaly at the hands of Armenians, yet had nothing to do with the events in Khojaly in neither time nor space. The Iranian press exposed a picture presented by the Azerbaijani embassy as being from 1992 in Khojaly, but it was a picture taken sometime around 1915, as registered by the US Library of Congress submitted by American Near East Relief. Worse, the picture was of an Armenian woman grieving over the death of a child near Aleppo, Syria during a real genocide, the genocide of the Armenians.

The Iranian online news site exposed this folly and reinforced analyst claims of staged mutilation of Azerbaijani civilian corpses by Azerbaijanis as well as some new facts uncovered in this Persian language report. The first image below is the WWI photo presented last week by the Azerbaijani embassy as being from 1992. The second image is the US Library of Congress record of the same photo. The third image is from the cover of a new book, The Thirty-Year Genocide: Turkey’s Destruction of Its Christian Minorities, 1894–1924, by Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi which uses the same WWI photo the Azerbaijan embassy tried to pass off as being from Khojaly in 1992.

There was undoubtedly a considerable loss of Azerbaijani civilian lives who for days were told by their leaders to ignore megaphones announcements by Armenians to evacuate Khojaly, It’s bad enough when death is meaningless, but worse when a human tragedy is staged and then used for partisan political ends. The Azerbaijani president, Ayaz Mutalibov was conveniently blamed for the Khojaly massacre and ousted, and Azerbaijani-mutilated dead bodies used for anti-Armenian propaganda. The Iranian report mentioned an Azerbaijani video, released only last year, showing dead Azerbaijani bodies moved some 10-20 km from the Armenian side of the contact line well into Azerbaijani controlled land, then mutilated, with Baku subsequently calling regional press agencies to video the aftermath. 

There are many other fake photos used by Azerbaijan in its attempt to substantiate their claims that Armenians committed a wholesale massacre singling out civilians. Azerbaijanis use a photoof a mother grieving over the deaths of their children in Erzurum, Turkey during a massive earthquake, published in the Turkish newspaper Hurriyet on 30 October 1983, and claim it was a photo of dead Azerbaijani children in 1992 in Khojaly. This photo was on the official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan last year. Maybe it still is.

Many such fake photos are exhibited, and stories told in Azerbaijani government-sponsored commemorations that take place in embassies and, ironically in houses of worship such as in Los Angeles, other US states, while internationallyunder the guise of “Azerbaijani tolerance” and “Armenian horrors.” It is indeed odd that if Khojaly was one of “the worst tragedies of the 20th century”, why are there not enough photos of the actual event? Why would Azerbaijan take the chance of being exposed, such as by the Iranian press, by using photos from many years distant from 1992? The main reason for the lack of actual photos is that over the past twenty-five years or so reporters and analysis have exposed so many before and after photos of “dead on the Armenian side, moved, then subsequently mutilated on the Azerbaijani side” that Azerbaijan removed those photos from the public domain.

Press release – EBRD is responsible for the Amulsar crisis in Jermuk. EBRD / EBRD Shares Responsibility for the Amulsar Mine Crisis in Jermuk. AEF:

Good daydear media,

X:please publishattached Armenian and Englishthe articlepreserving all active links։
EBRD Shares Responsibility for the Amulsar Mine Crisis in Jermuk

Sincerely –Best regards,
Armenian Environmental Front (AEF) Civil Initiative

Website: channel:  http://www.youtube.com/user/armecofront
Facebook page: group: / Contact – tel./tel.+374 99 53 05 88, +374 93 53 49 59

Address: Yerevan, Spendiaryan 5, apt. 24:00
Address: 5 Spendiaryan str. apt. 24, Yerevan, Armenia



MS-Word document


EBRD_Arm.doc

MS-Word document


EBRD-Lydian.JPG

JPEG image

Co-Chairs urge not to “put some principles or elements over others”

MediaMax, Armenia
March 9 2019
 
 
Co-Chairs urge not to “put some principles or elements over others”
 
 
 
Yerevan /Mediamax/. Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group issued a press statement on the upcoming Meeting of President Aliyev and Prime Minister Pashinyan.
 
“The Co-Chairs, working closely with the two foreign ministers, have been making preparations for this important leaders’ meeting, which will be the first direct contact between the two leaders conducted under Co-Chair auspices”, the statement reads.
 
“The Co-Chairs underline the importance of maintaining an environment conducive to productive discussions and continue to assess positively the recent lack of casualties on the front lines. The Co-Chairs also welcome some initial steps being taken in the region to prepare the populations for peace and encourage the sides to intensify such efforts. At the same time, the Co-Chairs reiterate the critical importance of reducing tensions and minimizing inflammatory rhetoric. In this context, the Co-Chairs urge the sides to refrain from statements and actions suggesting significant changes to the situation on the ground, prejudging the outcome of or setting conditions for future talks, demanding unilateral changes to the format without agreement of the other party, or indicating readiness to renew active hostilities.
 
With reference to some contradictory recent public statements on the substance of the Minsk Group process, the Co-Chairs reiterate that a fair and lasting settlement must be based on the core principles of the Helsinki Final Act, including in particular the non-use or threat of force, territorial integrity, and the equal rights and self-determination of peoples.
 
It also should embrace additional elements as proposed by the Presidents of the Co-Chair countries in 2009-2012, including: return of the territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijani control; an interim status for Nagorno-Karabakh providing guarantees for security and self-governance; a corridor linking Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh; future determination of the final legal status of Nagorno-Karabakh through a legally binding _expression_ of will; the right of all internally displaced persons and refugees to return to their former places of residence; and international security guarantees that would include a peacekeeping operation.
 
The Co-Chairs stress their view that these principles and elements must be the foundation of any fair and lasting settlement to the conflict and should be conceived as an integrated whole. Any attempt to put some principles or elements over others would make it impossible to achieve a balanced solution”, the document says.
 
The Co-Chairs also noted that the “continuous and direct dialogue between Baku and Yerevan conducted under the auspices of the Co-Chairs remains an essential element in building confidence and advancing the peace process. The Co-Chairs will also continue to discuss, as appropriate, relevant issues with the interested parties directly affected by the conflict, recognizing that their views and concerns must be taken into account for any negotiated solution to succeed”, the statement reads.

Swallows & Armenians – reappraising a children’s classic

University of Leeds, UK
March 9 2019

John, Susan, Titty, Roger. The fictional Walker children are much-loved characters in Arthur Ransome’s Swallows and Amazons – a quintessentially English family in an archetypal children’s classic.

But it was an Anglo-Armenian family that provided the inspiration for the Walkers, and now a fellow Anglo-Armenian artist has embarked on a mission to firmly re-establish the connection, using correspondence found in a University of Leeds archive.

Taqui, Susan, Mavis (known to her family as Titty), Roger and Brigit Altounyan lived in Aleppo in Syria. They met Ransome during a summer holiday of sailing, fishing and camping in the Lake District in 1928. Their experiences of learning to sail on Coniston Water inspired the author to write a book for children.

Eldest daughter Taqui recalled how “Uncle Arthur” helped their Northern Irish-Armenian father Ernest buy two dinghies, naming them Swallow and Mavis.

The four older Altounyan children. Date unknown. © Guzelian family.

Ernest helped run his family’s renowned hospital in Aleppo, but the children knew the Lake District well, spending summer holidays at the home of their maternal grandfather William G Collingwood, a notable artist.

Leeds-born Ransome was himself a close family friend of the Collingwoods and had visited them in the Lakes from childhood. He learned to sail in their boat – also called Swallow.

Two years after that idyllic summer of 1928, the first edition of Swallows and Amazons was published. It bore the dedication: “To the six for whom it was written in exchange for a pair of slippers“, referring to a pair of Turkish slippers the Altounyans had given Ransome as a parting gift.

But Ransome went on to distance his characters and the Altounyan children, excising that dedication and emphasising the inspiration of his own childhood visits to Nibthwaite in the Lake District.

Arthur Ransome with four of the five Altounyan children and their mother, Dora. Date unknown. © Arthur Ransome Literary Estate

Now Cumbrian-based artist Karen Babayan, who herself left Iran as a teenager after the Islamic Revolution 40 years ago, wants to redress the balance.

Swallows and Amazons is the first of a series of masterpieces of childrens’ literature,” she said. “But what is not widely enough known is the part that Altounyan family played as the catalyst for the books, which are such an integral part of Lake District mythology.

“I want the contribution of the Altounyan family to be more widely acknowledged and celebrated, bringing positive awareness of different cultures in the area,” she said.

“In knowing the identity and ethnicity of the children, I believe young British readers of all cultural backgrounds would feel more connected to and excited by the works of Arthur Ransome and the timeless landscape of the Lake District.”

I want the contribution of the Altounyan family to be more widely acknowledged and celebrated, bringing positive awareness of different cultures in the Lake District.

KAREN BABAYAN, ARTIST

Ms Babayan’s Art Council England-funded project includes:

  • book of short stories, launched at Words by the Water, Keswick’s literature festival (9 March);
  • An exhibition of paintings, text works, sculptures, artists’ books and film on two floors at Theatre by the Lake (6 March-10 April);
  • A participatory Armenian circle dance event on the shores of Derwentwater with dancer Shakeh Major; Tchilingirian, in honour of Ernerst Altounyan – who loved to dance and in celebration of the survivors of the Armenian Genocide who were treated, employed and supported by the Altounyan family in Aleppo (9 March);
  • talk at the University of Leeds (21 March);
  • talk for the Armenian Institute (30 March) Nevarte Gulbenkian Hall, Iverna Gardens, London W8 6TP.

The book – Swallows and Armenians – explores the Altounyans’ lives in Coniston and Aleppo, bringing to life their cultural history, traditions and their relationship with the Ransomes.

Interviews with family members, curators and authors further inform the book, which reasserts the Middle Eastern cultural context, with links to the current war in Syria and the migrant crisis.

Another element of the project by this multi-disciplinary artist was a performance of children aged 8-13, working with Ms Babayan’s daughter, actor and director Persia Babayan-Taylor. They devised a performance based on the book of short stories and performed it at the Theatre by the Lake in February.

An exhibition using film, artists’ books, photography, painting, prints and objects, will explore the Altounyans in the context of Ms Babayan’s own family history. A limited edition map book produced by the University’s Wild Pansy Press, will link Aleppo to Coniston and the Altounyans to Ransome through the Leeds archive’s rich photographic history. Workshops with Leeds primary school children also fed into its creation.

A selection of family portraits by Dora Altounyan will also go on public show for the first time – including an iconic portrait of Titty as a child, which was in Ransome’s possession for many years.

Mystery has surrounded the reasons why the relationship between Ernest Altounyan and Ransome and his Russian wife Evgenia cooled after the publication of his most famous book.

It was thought the seeds for this were planted during a three month visit by the Ransomes to Aleppo in 1932, when it is suggested they offered to adopt Titty and give her a better life in England; an offer which would surely have caused offence to a distinguished family of doctors.

But while Ms Babayan points out that there is no evidence to confirm or refute this claim, clues to what happened lie in the boxes of letters and diaries that form part of the Arthur Ransome Archive held in Leeds University Library’s Special Collections.

She has drawn on this partially-unpublished material, which includes an emotionally-charged letter from Ernest Altounyan to Arthur Ransome, sent following the hasty departure of the couple from Aleppo.

In his autobiography, the reasons given for their departure are mainly put down to Ransome’s ongoing health problems, exacerbated by life in Aleppo. But Ernest’s letter suggests that Ransome accused him of “managing” his wife Dora (née Collingwood) and of “keeping her out in the East for too long”.

Ms Babayan believes that an element of jealousy – perhaps regret – may have fuelled this argument on Arthur Ransome’s part: as a young man he had proposed to Dora. 

“It was also a painful realisation by Ernest that his long friendship with Arthur, previously assumed to be on an equal footing, was in fact nothing of the sort,” she added.

The same revealing correspondence between author and doctor also claimed Ransome had suggested that the children would be “so out of it as to feel like savages”. The Ransomes were keen for the Altounyan children to receive a British education as they got older.

Ms Babayan asserts that the Ransomes underestimated the strength of, and pride in, the Armenian family bond.

“The prospect of being separated from his family was too painful for Ernest to contemplate,” she said. “Members of his family had died in the Armenian genocide, which began in 1915.

“They were unable to return to their home town of Sivas in Ottoman Turkey and lost their farms and house in the area of Souookolook in the Syrian mountains. The family were instrumental in the relief of Armenian refugees who flooded into Aleppo during this time and were living amongst, treating and employing orphans and survivors.”

But the relationship between the two families was patched up and correspondence continued, mainly between Dora and Arthur, right up to her death in 1964. When the three eldest girls were eventually sent to a school in Bowness-on-Windermere, Arthur and Evgenia assisted by hosting the girls and taking them for trips.

“The girls found they were not at all behind their peers, but boarding school in England was an inevitable shock to the children, used as they were to a more unstructured education,” added Ms Babayan.

“They also suffered from the kind of name-calling endemic in schools and were cruelly nicknamed the ‘Three Zulus’ by their classmates.

“As the Altounyan children matured they remained very fond of Arthur and Evgenia, often sailing with them on the Norfolk Broads. But whether it was the initial disagreement in Aleppo or Ransome’s irritation with Ernest – who enjoyed and boasted of their family’s link to the books – which prompted the author to deny the children’s role in the inspiration for Swallows and Amazons in his autobiography, we will never know.”

The four older Altounyan children in Aleppo. Date unknown. © Arthur Ransome Literary Estate

Further information

Karen Babayan was born in Iran to Armenian/British parents, moving to Leeds in 1978 just prior to the Islamic Revolution in 1979. Latterly she lived in the city’s Hyde Park area – a stone’s throw from the house in which Arthur Ransome was born. She has lived in Appleby, Cumbria since 2009. An established artist, Babayan has had more than 20 solo shows and participated in more than 50 group exhibitions since 1990, including The Tetley contemporary art gallery in Leeds and The Harris Art Gallery, Preston.

Main image: Mavis Guzelian (née Altounyan), the inspiration for Titty, on the lap of a nanny while boating on Coniston Lake in the early 1920s with her older sisters Taqui (l) and Susie and their maternal aunt Barbara. Credit: © Guzelian Ltd

For images of the Altounyan children and Arthur Ransome, interviews and further information, contact University of Leeds Media Relations Manager Gareth Dant on +44(0)113 343 3996 or email [email protected]

https://www.leeds.ac.uk/news/article/4381/swallows_and_armenians__reappraising_a_childrens_classic

Six-seven candidates wish to participate in elections of Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople: Ara Gochunyan

Aysor, Armenia
March 9 2019

Forty days after the death of Armenian Patriarch of Turkey Mesrop Mutafyan the preparation phase for the elections of new patriarch will start. As of now there are 6-7 candidates but everything will be clear after the 40-day mourn ends, editor of Istanbul-based Zhamanak paper Ara Gochunyan said, speaking to Aysor.am.

He stressed that the day of elections, the day of crowning and number of candidates as well as all other details are yet to be specified.

He said that today a session will be convened by Aram Ateshyan, who was replacing Mutafyan for these years, to clarify all the issues on funeral and burial procedure of the deceased Patriarch.

“The Patriarchate of Constantinople informed Holy See of St. Etchmiadzin which supposes their participation in the funerals. More probably the funerals will take place on March 17,” he said, adding that after 40-day mourning administrative processes will launch and the process of election of new Patriarch will start.

Gochunyan said for proper organization of elections the Patriarchate will closely cooperate with state bodies.

The editor said today 38 Armenian churches are functioning in the territory of Turkey which means as much electoral precincts will operate in the whole territory of the country.

He said in pre-electoral phase candidates will receive letters and respond to them, noting whether they want to participate in the elections or not.

As to the attitude of the Armenian community toward Aram Ateshyan, considering the dissatisfaction of him, Gochunyan said he would not like to generalize this attitude and said he treats Ateshyan normally.

Mutafyan died on March 8 at the age of 62. He was in hospital for the past 11 years suffering from incurable disease.

Swallows and Armenians: Arthur Ransome’s forgotten inspirations revealed

The Guardian, UK
March 9 2019
Swallows and Armenians: Arthur Ransome’s forgotten inspirations revealed

A new art project is exploring how the characters in the English children’s classic were modelled on a family from Aleppo

Azerbaijan’s drills "a response to Armenia’s resolve not to cede land"

PanArmenian, Armenia
March 9 2019

PanARMENIAN.NetAzerbaijan is holding major military drills on March 11-15 but has not notified the relevant international organizations of such plans, Armenian Defense Ministry spokesman Artsrun Hovhannisyan has said in a Facebook post.

Hovhhanisyan described the upcoming drills as “a pressure attempt” ahead of a possible meeting between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and “in response to the declaration that Armenia is not going to cede territory from the liberated lands to Azerbaijan.”

“Under the Vienna Document from 2011, notifications should be sent out on military drills if they involve at least 9,000 personnel, 250 tanks or 500 military armored vehicles or 250 self-propelled and towed artillery weapons, mortars and multiple rocket launchers,” the spokesman said.

The Vienna Document is an agreement between the participating states of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe which was intended to implement confidence and security building measures. Under the document, the participating states exchange annually informationto provide transparency about their intentions in the medium to long term as regards size, structure, training and equipment of its armed forces, as well as defense policy, doctrines and budgets related thereto.The information is provided to all other participating states not later than three months after the military budget has been approved by the competent national authorities.

He further revealed that 10,000 personnel, up to 500 tanks and other armored vehicles, at least 300 artillery equipment of various caliber, grenade launchers, missiles and reactive volley-fire systems, as well as 20 military planes and helicopters are going to be involved in the Azerbaijani drills.