Sports: Arsenal ready to leave Armenian Henrikh Mkhitaryan at home when they travel to Azerbaijan for Europa League final against Chelsea

Daily Mail, UK
  • Arsenal resigned to Mkhitaryan being unable to play in the Europa League final 
  • The Armenian has missed trips to Azerbaijan in the past due to political tensions
  • Assurances over the security of the midfielder were sought with UEFA last week

Arsenal are resigned to Henrikh Mkhitaryan being unable to play in the Europa League final.

The Gunners continued their preparations on Thursday for the clash with London rivals Chelsea in Azerbaijan on May 29.

But they face the prospect of leaving the Armenian midfielder at home when they travel to Baku for the final, according to the Guardian.

Mkhitaryan would be required to apply to the Azerbaijani government for a permit to make the trip to Baku.

The two countries have had no diplomatic relations since the Nagorno-Karabakh War, which ended in 1994.

Assurances over Mkhitaryan’s security were sought with UEFA last week, because of the ongoing political tensions.

Arsenal are expected to make a decision early next week, but they are not optimistic about the 30-year-old being able to make the trip. 

The midfielder missed the trip to face Qarabag in Baku earlier this season because of fears for his safety amid ongoing political tension between his native Armenia and host nation Azerbaijan.

In 2015, Mkhitaryan did not travel to Azerbaijan to face Gabala while with Borussia Dortmund despite being told by UEFA that he would get a visa.

There would be considerable safety risks if Mkhitaryan were to go to Baku given his standing as one of the Armenia’s most high-profile figures and the historical bad blood between the two nations. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-7038151/Arsenal-ready-leave-Mkhitaryan-home-travel-Baku-Europa-League-final.html

Sports: British-Armenian Arsenal fans prevented from attending Europa League final

Daily Cannon
 
 
British-Armenian Arsenal fans prevented from attending Europa League final
 
By Dan Critchlow –
 
Some Arsenal fans are finding themselves unable to attend the Europa League final in Baku, even if they have a ticket and flights booked, simply because of their nationality.

With every day, the decision to host the Europa League final in Baku appears more ridiculous.

The difficulty and cost of travel to reach Azerbaijan is so high that UEFA openly admit that’s why they’ve given Arsenal and Chelsea fans such tiny allocations (6,000 seats in a 68,700 capacity stadium).

Then there’s Henrikh Mkhitaryan, who may not be able to take part over concerns about his safety as an Armenian playing in Azerbaijan.

Guardian writer Amy Lawrence made the point that this is being rather brushed over because Mkhitaryan isn’t the most important member of Arsenal’s squad. If Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang couldn’t go, for example, you’d imagine this would be taken much more seriously.

It’s not only Mkhitaryan, though. There are reports all over social media of Armenian Arsenal members and season ticket holders who have been advised against attending or blocked completely due to their nationality.

It’s bizarre that this was considered an acceptable location to hold the final. The majority of top teams in the competition would have trouble getting their fans to Baku, not just because it’s far away, but because the airport is small and there are so few alternative travel options, before we get into the various visa problems for supporters.

Having been to Baku in the group stage, I can safely say the public transport between the airport and the stadium is limited at best. There’s one bus running a couple of times an hour, which could maybe get a few hundred fans to and from the ground, not thousands.

Arsenal have publicly stated their disappointment and described what has happened as ‘unacceptable’. Let’s hope Chelsea join them in expressing the same sentiment and UEFA puts the bare minimum amount of thought into their selection of future venues.


 
 
 
 
 

Sports: Why did Uefa hand Azerbaijan hosting rights for the Europa League final?

The Guardian, UK
 
 
Why did Uefa hand Azerbaijan hosting rights for the Europa League final?
 
Paul Doyle
The ruling body’s principle of rotating finals is a good one but the golden ticket has to be awarded for the right reasons

You had to admire Uefa’s steadfastness in the face of unfortunate timing. The decision to award the hosting rights for the Europa League final to Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, was made public in September 2017, just a few weeks after entirely unrelated revelations about a huge underhanded campaign to whitewash Azerbaijan’s international reputation.

The so-called Azerbaijani Laundromat scandal came to light thanks to bank leaks that showed about £2bn had been funnelled out of oil-rich Azerbaijan between 2012 and 2014 through various European financial institutions and companies, including some registered in Britain. It was primarily an elaborate money-laundering scam but some lolly found its way into the pockets of lobbyists and politicians who were encouraged to help polish the reputation of Azerbaijan.

In the aftermath of the revelations 13 members of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (Pace) were found to have accepted gifts or bribes from the Azerbaijani government and were expelled from the Council of Europe, an organisation set up in 1947 “to promote democracy and protect human rights and the rule of law in Europe”. The donations were made around the time Pace was compiling a report into institutionalised corruption and the suppression of politician dissent in Azerbaijan.

Ilham Aliyev, the country’s president since 2003, went on to win a third term in 2018, with an impressive 86% of the Azerbaijani electorate apparently convinced there was no better person for the job. Aliyev’s regime does not score so highly on Reporters Without Borders’ World Press Freedom Index, in which Azerbaijan has slipped this year to 166th, the lowest-ranked country in Europe, between Bahrain and Equatorial Guinea.

“Not content with crushing all forms of pluralism, president Ilham Aliyev has been waging a relentless war against his remaining media critics since 2014,” says Reporters Without Borders. “Independent journalists and bloggers are jailed on absurd grounds if they do not first yield to harassment, beatings, blackmail or bribes.”

Still, none of the above has anything to do with Uefa or football, so why not let Baku stage the final of Europe’s second most prestigious club competition. Right?

OK, let’s go with that line of thinking for a moment.

Uefa cannot avoid political considerations altogether because, unhappily for football’s not-for-profit governing body, it turns out that one of the teams who reached the final, Arsenal, have a player from Armenia. There are no diplomatic relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia because of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and although Azerbaijani authorities have said they will allow Henrikh Mkhitaryan into the country, Arsenal have yet to be satisfied by Uefa that their midfielder’s safety can be guaranteed. The club, therefore, may feel obliged to omit one of their top players from the most important match of their season.

Uefa is well aware of the depth of the tensions that exist between Azerbaijan and Armenia. There may even be some culture buffs at Uefa who read a report in February in the art journal Hyperallergic, which claimed that over the last 30 years the Azerbaijani government has engaged in the systematic destruction of traces of the country’s Armenian heritage, including Unesco-protected monuments, on a scale beyond that of the Islamic State’s dynamiting of Palmyra in the Syrian desert.

Because of its awareness of the enmity between the two governments, Uefa keeps Azerbaijan and Armenia apart in draws for competitions. But it looks as if it failed to plan for the eventuality of a team with an Armenia international reaching a final. One wonders what will happen if Armenia qualify for Euro 2020. Baku was awarded the right to host four matches in those finals, three group games and a quarter-final.

Uefa’s decision was a publicity coup for the Azerbaijani regime, with the country’s official media organ reacting to the award of the Europa Leaguefinal by hailing it as another chance for the country to showcase its ability to stage world-class events and to prove it is a major “Eurasian logistical hub”.

Alas, that last claim took a dent when Uefa said Arsenal and Chelsea would be allocated fewer than 13,000 tickets between them for a stadium with more than 68,000 seats because the airport serving Baku cannot cope with more travellers than that. “Offering more tickets to fans of the participating teams … was therefore not the responsible option,” wrote Uefa.

The tickets are very expensive, the venue is far away and, it turns out, the vast majority of fans could not get to the final even if they had the time and money to do so, just like, perhaps, Mkhitaryan.

All things considered, then, Baku was a bad choice. The principle of switching venues from year to year is a good one, however. If, as some have suggested, Uefa waited until the identity of the finalists was known so that it could choose a stadium close to both, then finals would probably be the exclusive preserve of western Europe because that is where most of the continent’s richest clubs are concentrated.

Since 1999, when two-leg finals were scrapped, only five of the 21 Uefa Cup/Europa League finals have had a participant from eastern Europe and there have been none from Scandinavia. Similarly, in the Champions League, there has not been a finalist from eastern Europe since 1991 and, in fact, every one since 2005 has come from Spain, England, Italy or Germany.

If clubs from the rest of the continent cannot realistically expect to reach a final, they should at least be allowed to hope their country hosts one. In the name of fairness. And not, of course, for the wrong reasons.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2019/may/16/uefa-handed-azerbaijan-europa-league-final-baku-chelsea-arsenal


Sports: Arsenal face prospect of having to leave Mkhitaryan at home for Baku final

The Guardian, UK
Arsenal face prospect of having to leave Mkhitaryan at home for Baku final

Anger that safety fears may cost Armenian in Europa League
Gunners release statement about ‘extreme’ travel issues


 Henrikh Mkhitaryan is set to miss out on the final in Baku due to ongoing political tensions between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Photograph: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC via Getty Images

Arsenal are preparing for the prospect of leaving their Armenian midfielder Henrikh Mkhitaryan at home for the Europa League final in Baku on 29 May. There is significant anger within the camp that one of their players feels effectively forced to miss such a major match over safety issues.

Assurances over Mkhitaryan’s security were sought with Uefa last week, because of the ongoing political tensions between Azerbaijan and neighbouring Armenia, and talks are ongoing. Arsenal’s decision will be confirmed by early next week at the latest, but they are not optimistic about a positive resolution.

Both club and player are deeply disappointed. Although Mkhitaryan has not been a starter in Arsenal’s recent matches in the Europa League, over the course of the campaign he has played in 11 of the 14 games, and not one of his midfield team-mates have been on the pitch in the competition for more minutes than he has. Mkhitaryan has previously scored in a Europa League final for Manchester United, two years ago in Stockholm.

It is not considered realistic for Arsenal to pull out of the competition in protest, with so much at stake in terms of a trophy and qualification for the Champions League that is predicted to be worth approximately £60m in terms of their potential transfer budget. The more important point is that a club should not be in a position where they feel obliged to ponder pulling out of a final, and a player under Uefa’s jurisdiction should not feel pushed to miss one of its showpiece finals because of his nationality.

Mkhitaryan’s team-mates are upset they might have to travel without him. The rest of the squad, including injured players like Aaron Ramsey, Héctor Bellerín, Rob Holding and Danny Welbeck, are all welcomed into the party to play the final against Chelsea.

This is not the only issue Arsenal have raised with Uefa over the final venue, as they released a statement about the “extreme” travel challenges that have made it so difficult for fans to attend. “We are bitterly disappointed by the fact that due to transport limitations Uefa can only make a maximum of 6,000 tickets available to Arsenal for a stadium with a capacity of well over 60,000,” it read. “Time will tell if it is even possible for 6,000 Arsenal fans to attend the match, given how extreme the travel challenges are.

The Fiver: sign up and get our daily football email.

“We have 45,000 season ticket holders and for so many fans to miss out due to Uefa selecting a final venue with such limited transport provision is quite simply not right. We have received many complaints about this and we fully share their concerns.

“On behalf of our fans, we would like to understand the criteria by which venues are selected for finals, and also how supporter requirements are taken into account as part of this. Moving forward we would urge Uefa to ensure that supporter logistics and requirements are a key part of any future decisions for final venues as what has happened this season is unacceptable, and cannot be repeated. We would be happy to join any future discussions to avoid this situation happening again.”

U.S. Envoy Sees Progress in Karabakh Talks, Discusses U.S.-Armenia Ties

U.S. Ambassador to Armenia Lynne Tracy addresses the American Chamber of Commerce of Armenia

In a policy speech presented Wednesday at the American Chamber of Commerce of Armenia, the United States Ambassador to Armenia Lynne Tracy praised the democratic changes taking place in Armenia and said she was encouraged by the recent movement on the Karabakh peace talks. She also commented on U.S.-Armenia relations and its implications on the region.

Below is the text of her speech.

I am honored to be representing the United States of America here in Armenia – and I have been keeping very busy during my first two and a half months here. I think I have now met with every minister as well as many other representatives from across the Armenian government and parliament. I have also met civil society groups, students and members of this Chamber. These meetings all helped me understand first-hand the incredible breadth of our bilateral relationship.

Just last week, our two governments recommitted to strengthening that relationship during the U.S.-Armenia Strategic Dialogue here in Yerevan. Foreign Minister Mnatsakanyan hosted a high-level U.S. delegation, with representation from the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Department of Commerce, as well as several State Department bureaus. Our talks focused on how we could deepen cooperation on a range of issues, from global and regional security to promoting mutual prosperity, and from law enforcement to assistance in support of democratic reforms. We had a positive agenda, focused on the opportunities, but also addressed the challenges.

Following the strategic dialogue, we were pleased to sign assistance agreements of up to $16 million. We also launched a new USAID initiative to support Armenia’s democratic reform agenda. We will develop the details of this initiative in consultation with stakeholders, but broadly speaking, we intend to offer technical assistance to the government, promote economic empowerment and community development, facilitate small-scale infrastructure and service delivery improvements, and strengthen information campaigns on Armenia’s reform and development process.

But that’s not all. During last week’s dialogue, we showed our commitment to assisting in the development of a transparent, fair, and independent criminal justice system by dedicating the Armenian-American Friendship Hallway in Armenia’s Justice Academy. We also committed to expanding English language training for Armenian students and teachers, and agreed to establish a Master’s degree program in American Studies at an Armenian university.

I am very pleased with the fruitful and frank discussions between our delegations last week, and I am proud that our dialogue resulted in a number of tangible outcomes. Of course the question now is, how do we continue to build upon this dialogue? Since my arrival, I have often been asked about my plan; about what I hope to accomplish as U.S. Ambassador to Armenia. The short answer is this: It is my job to represent the interests of the United States in Armenia, and it is in our interest to support the development of a sovereign, democratic nation.

The fact of the matter is the United States has supported democratic processes and institutions in Armenia for the last 27 years – ever since we officially established diplomatic relations. That priority has been consistent. What has changed is Armenia itself. I don’t need to tell you that democracy in Armenia is stronger than ever. And as the events of last spring showed us, change starts with and is driven by Armenians. It was the people of Armenia who flooded the streets last April. It was Armenians across the country who stood up and demanded the right to live in a free and democratic country; the right to live in a country where government, civil society, and businesses work together in a free, fair, and transparent manner to create a more prosperous future for all. And while I am proud that the United States was the first foreign country to provide elections assistance after the events of last spring, it was the people of Armenia who exercised their right to vote in a free and fair democratic election last December. I plan to continue to support the Armenian people as they make choices to develop and solidify their democracy in a way that bolsters the rule of law and protects human dignity.

I have spent the last few months in listening mode because I wanted to hear the voices of Armenians and the future they envision for their country. I wanted to learn about Armenia’s priorities so I could determine how the United States can best capitalize on our shared values to ensure a mutually beneficial path forward.

I am especially encouraged by the government’s efforts to root out corruption and promote transparency. This will help level the playing field and signal to the international community that Armenia is a country that respects the rule of law and is open for business. This is particularly important given the strong potential for an improved U.S.-Armenian economic relationship. A stronger trade and investment relationship will support our mutual desire to secure sustainable and inclusive economic growth, achieve greater economic diversification, and foster competition and innovation. And of course, innovative, dynamic business leaders and entrepreneurs contribute their expertise to help grow the domestic economy and compete internationally.

We can point to several recent successful developments in these areas. Over the past few years, we have witnessed sustained U.S. business interest in the Armenian market in the hydroelectric, IT, finance, retail and agricultural sectors.

This includes ContourGlobal’s purchase of the Vorotan Cascade Hydro Power Plant, a deal involving $250 million worth of investment.

It also includes the work of our Overseas Private Investment Corporation, or OPIC, which has recently provided three loans worth $20 million to the First Mortgage Company – the first private residential mortgage finance company in Armenia. OPIC has also supported the expansion into Armenia of the Gazelle Fund, an investment fund that provides business advice to small and growing Armenian enterprises and provides the financing they need to expand their businesses and create jobs.

But, there is still a great deal of untapped potential in our economic relationship. Armenia’s strong economic growth in recent years, over 7% in 2017 and 5% in 2018, demonstrates the potential for ongoing robust growth – but only if the business environment is conducive to sustained economic activity, investment, and innovation. Businesses are looking for Armenia to continue its efforts to create a fair, predictable, and transparent investment climate. We look forward to seeing the Armenian government pursue serious reforms that eliminate corruption, strengthen institutions, and bolster the rule of law.

For our part, the U.S. Embassy will continue to engage the Armenian government and private sector as we pursue business facilitation efforts and demonstrate the very best of what U.S. companies have to offer: their world-class technology, unrivaled know-how, and highest standards of business culture. We engage with U.S. companies every day as they look to Armenia as a destination for making new investments and expanding their operations. We will continue to support them as they seek out new partners here and we will advocate on their behalf where appropriate as we deepen our trade and investment relationship.

Investment and innovation in the IT and STEM fields as a means to drive economic development is just one of many shared values between our countries. Armenia stands out on the world stage for its deep stock of human capital. The Armenian people are known as innovators and visionaries in numerous fields. Of course, maintaining this prized position requires constant attention and effort, and I have every confidence Armenia is up to the challenge.

I recently attended my first hackathon – a remarkable, innovative concept where teams of technologically-minded young people get together to solve pressing problems facing their country. For me, it was the perfect example of how government, civil society, and youth can work constructively together to improve government transparency, accountability and efficiency through the innovative use of technology. I was proud that the U.S. Embassy was behind this initiative and that we could offer small seed money to the winners to develop the projects they dreamed up at the hackathon. One group came up with a prototype of an electronic mechanism to improve irrigation systems – a project that would ensure more effective use of scarce water resources and support Armenia’s critically important agricultural sector. Again, the government cannot carry out all the needed reforms on its own – in a democracy, it needs help from the people. It needs vibrant and robust partnerships among all sectors of society.

One constant refrain I hear in my conversations with Armenians about the economy is that economic development outside of Yerevan is vital to Armenia’s overall economic success. I believe them. I’ve already met Armenians from all over the country who are innovative, motivated, and eager to contribute to their country’s prosperity – and that motivation needs to be nurtured. Especially when those ambitions are coming from young people – the future of this country. We must do all we can to keep them in Armenia, and to empower them to achieve their dreams.

One young woman I met during a recent trip to Gyumri is doing just that. Gayane Ghandilyan is spearheading the development of Armenia’s IT sector as a Chief Operating Officer at the software development company Digital Pomegranate. Her work is directly tackling the challenge of attracting talent to Gyumri. The Embassy is committed to supporting leaders like Ms. Ghandilyan in their efforts to drive economic recovery and development in Gyumri and in other regions of Armenia. But it is important for local and national government to also work to create the necessary conditions to recruit and retain talent outside of Yerevan. It would be a shame to overlook the tremendous talent and potential contributions of Armenians all over the country.

The United States has shown our commitment to regional development in Armenia through our assistance programs. Through collaboration with our Armenian partners, these programs help this country grow as a sovereign and democratic state.

Since 1992, the U.S. government has provided more than 2 billion dollars in assistance funding to improve the lives of the Armenian people, supporting their efforts to strengthen democratic, economic, and social governance.

In 2018, the United States provided $26.7 million in assistance funding to Armenia. But this does not tell the whole story, since so many of our assistance projects span multiple years. Right now, the total value of all of our active USAID grants and contracts in Armenia is $66 million.

Now that I’ve thrown a bunch of numbers at you, let me explain what all this funding does. The goal is to help develop a more engaged, prosperous and well governed Armenian society through Armenian-led reforms and initiatives. Fifty percent of assistance is programmed through the Government of Armenia and local organizations. This strategy means projects are more cost-effective, more sustainable, and more relevant to local populations – because they start with Armenians. And the impact of this assistance extends far beyond the immediate beneficiaries – it is a catalyst for additional investment which will drive inclusive and sustainable economic growth and create a brighter future for Armenians.

For example, I recently had the opportunity to participate in the launch of the USAID-funded Rural Economic Development-New Economic Opportunities Program to support Armenia’s critical agricultural sector by helping to improve the performance of rural businesses and their ability to meet quality standards. This project will benefit at least 100 rural businesses in at least 60 rural communities over the next five years – creating economic opportunity all over Armenia.

This is just one example of the many positive outcomes of our bilateral relationship. Of course, like in any relationship, we do not agree on everything – and that’s OK. The important thing is that we have open lines of communication on all issues – even the more challenging ones. And we do! Open and honest dialogue between friends ensures that our relationship will continue to progress.

Progress, in our view, means strengthening Armenia’s democratic institutions, which will drive economic development and opportunity, which in turn ensures Armenia’s sovereignty and security, giving you the freedom to make your own choices, including choosing to move toward further integration with the West.

Armenia has already shown its commitment to partnering with the United States in the international arena in many ways. For instance, we value Armenia’s work with NATO in the Partnership for Peace – including your participation in NATO missions, such as the Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan. Armenia is a solid partner with the U.S. European Command, promoting regional stability in Kosovo. And Armenia’s strong partnership with the state of Kansas and the Kansas National Guard has resulted in fifteen years of fruitful exchanges that have brought our countries closer together.
Of course, we recognize that our relationship does not exist in a vacuum. We understand and appreciate that Armenia has a plethora of bilateral and multilateral international relationships, and, as a sovereign, democratic country, makes choices according to its own national interest. We also understand that as a reality of geography and history, Armenia maintains strong ties to Russia. But I think most Armenians agree with me that the Armenia-Russia relationship should not and does not preclude Armenia from also pursuing strong, mutually beneficial relations with the United States, the European Union, and other potential partners. And while Armenia’s geography and history link it to Russia, your values connect you to the West. These relationships are not mutually exclusive. Foreign affairs is not a zero-sum game.

So just as we seek to strengthen coordination and cooperation with our European allies, we will continue to work with Russia on issues of common interest, including working together toward a resolution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group format.

Today, I am more encouraged than ever with the Minsk Group process. It has been a long road and there are no easy solutions, but the events of recent months have led me to believe that progress is possible. High-level meetings between the sides, a reduction in violence and tensions, agreement on next steps and a commitment to continued dialogue show that progress is not out of the realm of possibility. And I am hearing from Armenians – especially young Armenians – that they are ready for progress.

It is because of this enthusiasm and great potential of this generation of Armenians that the U.S. Embassy remains committed to investing in the youth of Armenia. Some of you may have seen my introductory video that outlined a few key U.S. policy priorities. At the beginning of that video, I met a young woman named Yeva – she is an alumna of our FLEX exchange program for high school students. Yeva is a perfect example of why we invest in these types of programs – we are investing in Armenia’s human potential – men and women. Yeva is committed to her country and proud to return to Armenia and use her U.S. experience to better herself and create opportunities for others. The Embassy will continue to invest in programs like this that broaden horizons and build human potential through experience in the United States.

The good news in Armenia is of course, as I have mentioned, the motivation to continue to drive change in society is alive and well. As I have seen repeatedly in my brief time in Armenia, Armenians are invested and engaged in improving their future. They already know that change starts at home. Solidification of the democratic gains that have been achieved in the last year depends on Armenians. But I pledge to you that the United States is here as your friend and partner to support you as Armenia continues to move forward, develop its democracy, strengthen its economy, and build space for peace and prosperity.

168: Future of the Council of Europe

Categories
Politics
World

This year marks the 70th anniversary of the creation of the Council of Europe – an ambitious endeavour aimed at putting an end to centuries of wars on the European continent and at establishing – to quote the resolution of The Hague Congress of Europe in May 1948 – a democratic social system to free people from all types of slavery and economic insecurity. This European project, which by all accounts has resulted – at least in Western Europe – in the longest period of peace in human history and unprecedented quality of life for ordinary people, rests on some European institutions. Among them, the Council of Europe, founded in May 1949, which ensure democratic security based on shared values by upholding political democracy to protect people against the exercise of arbitrary power. It was created after the Second World War in order to achieve a greater unity between its members for the purpose of safeguarding and realising the ideals and principles which are our common heritage and facilitating their economic and social progress.

In 70 years, the Council of Europe has succeeded in creating a democratic system based on the strong institutions of democratic governance, a human rights protection mechanism and a common space of the rule of law.  This model of democratic governance at both national and local level represents as much of a landmark feature as its unique system of human rights protection centred on the European Convention and Court of Human Rights. The Council of Europe has played a key role in building pluralist and cohesive societies, which can be rightly seen as one of its main achievements.

Yet today, this model is in danger of unravelling. The protection it offers to Europeans is being challenged by far-reaching changes that affect, to varying degrees, all nations. We are witnessing the deterioration of democratic security as common values and standards are being called into question in multiple member states, and the rule of law is being regarded as an obstacle to action. We are witnessing the loss of public confidence in politicians and the institutions of governance, and in their ability to protect citizens and respond to their needs. We are witnessing the birth of new social and political movements initiated by citizens who feel ignored and let down by the system.

According to the European Union’s Eurobarometer of November 2018, more than 6 out of 10 EU citizens do not trust their government or parliament, and 8 out of 10 express mistrust in political parties. This crisis of political representation seriously undermines the functioning of representative democracy and tears at the very fabric of our societies, driving a wedge between “Us” and “Them” and fuelling a “clash” vision of society rather than a culture of living together. Stopping this destructive momentum, restoring the link between citizens and authorities requires an honest dialogue with people, a dialogue between the State and communities. This dialogue has been ongoing in our villages and towns, at the local level of our territories where mayors and councillors, local elected representatives have remained at the frontline of major events in community life, the first line of response to citizens’ concerns – and the last rampart against a more widespread rejection of political representation.

The same 2018 Eurobarometer placed the level of trust in local authorities at 50 per cent, well above the level of confidence in national governments and parliaments. Mayors and councillors, as local elected officials, are the representatives of public authorities who are closest to citizens. Central governments can and must use this proximity, the trust in local authorities and their network to rekindle democracy. Local and regional authorities are indeed crucial for upholding a strong social fabric, and there is a need to reassess their role in building a European democracy, and their impact on citizens’ participation in public institutions. The local level is an ideal one for participatory democracy as it ensures a substantial degree of people’s engagement in public affairs and decision making and provides an excellent platform for using innovative practices and tools.

Local and regional communities are also key players in asserting cultural identity and implementing national policies. National governments themselves recognised this when, in the preamble to the European Charter of Local Self-Government, they defined local democracy as one of the main foundations of any democratic regime.

They also recognised this when, in 1957, they showed their political vision by creating a conference of local authorities within the Council of Europe and transforming it 25 years ago into the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities – with the task of advancing local democracy and strengthening the important role played by local and regional communities and their elected representatives. The mission of the Council of Europe is as relevant today, in the face of the current challenges to European democracy, as it was 70 years ago, in the wake of the Second World War. Back then, a few years after the Council of Europe’s creation, member States recognised the importance of local democracy and local authorities, and the need for their input to the European construction. This role of local authorities is as ever more important today.

Today, sustaining the European model requires, as never before, greater involvement of the local communities and their authorities. Local and regional authorities can help significantly to reconnect with citizens and restore confidence in institutions The Council of Europe member States created the Congress to strengthen the local and regional dimension of European democracy. As the assembly of local and regional elected representatives of 47 European countries, as the voice of more than 150 000 territorial communities in Europe, and the monitoring body for the European Charter of Local Self-Government, the Congress is well placed to contribute its experience and that of the municipalities and regions it represents, in order to develop comprehensive strategies aimed at revitalising and regenerating European democracy.

As we celebrate 70 years of the Council of Europe, it is essential to recognise territorial democracy as a crucial pillar of our democratic system.

Anders KNAPE

President of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities

The article was provided by Anders Knape to Emin Yeritsyan, the head of Armenian delegation in Congress of Local and Regional Authorities and the head of Union of Communities of Armenia. 




RFE/RL Armenian Report – 05/15/2019

                                        Wednesday, 
Karabakh Speaker Defends Calls For Kocharian’s Release
        • Ruzanna Stepanian
Armenia -- Parliament speaker Ararat Mirzoyan (L) and his Karabakh counterpart 
Ashot Ghulian hold a news conference in Yerevan, .
Calls for Robert Kocharian’s release from custody voiced by Nagorno-Karabakh’s 
present and former leaders reflect public opinion in the Armenian 
ex-president’s native region, the speaker of the Karabakh parliament said on 
Wednesday.
In a joint letter to Armenia’s Prosecutor-General Artur Davtian sent last week, 
Karabakh President Bako Sahakian and is predecessor Arkadi Ghukasian said 
Kocharian should be freed at least until a verdict in his trial. They cited his 
“huge contribution” to the Armenian victory in the 1991-1994 war with 
Azerbaijan.
Davtian’s office said in response that he is no longer in a position to grant 
such requests because the case has already been sent to a court in Yerevan.
The Karabakh leaders made a similar appeal to the court on Tuesday on the 
second day of Kocharian’s high-profile trial. They said they can guarantee that 
the ex-president will display “appropriate behavior” and not obstruct justice 
if set free.
Nagorno-Karabakh -- Armenian President Robert Kocharian (L), newly inaugurated 
Karabakh President Bako Sahakian (C) and his predecessor Arkadi Ghukasian walk 
in Stepanakert, September 7, 2007.
The presiding judge responded by saying that both Sahakian and Ghukasian must 
come to the court and personally offer such guarantees. According to 
Kocharian’s lawyers, both men are ready to do so.
Ashot Ghulian, the Karabakh speaker, sought to justify those appeals during a 
visit to Yerevan. “I think that what has been presented and said is enough to 
understand that we are talking about not influencing the trial but changing the 
[pre-trial] arrest,” Ghulian said after holding talks with Armenian parliament 
speaker Ararat Mirzoyan.
“I want us to view that as being the result of purely humanitarian and friendly 
relationships,” he told reporters. “I’m sure -- and you probably also know that 
-- that there is such sentiment in Artsakh (Karabakh) and it’s impossible not 
to react to that sentiment.”
Ghulian noted in that regard that Karabakh’s three leading parliamentary 
parties jointly urged Kocharian’s release in late December, three weeks after 
the latter was again taken into custody on charges stemming from the 2008 
post-election violence in the Armenian capital. One of those parties is led by 
the speaker.
Nagorno-Karabakh -- Supporters of Armenia's arrested former President Robert 
Kocharian demosntrate in Stepanakert, December 22, 2018.
Born and raised in Karabakh, Kocharian governed the Armenian-populated 
territory from 1992-1997. He denies the charges as politically motivated. 
Armenia’s current government and law-enforcement bodies deny any political 
motives behind his prosecution.
Kocharian’s continuing imprisonment provoked last week a war of words between 
Vitaly Balasanian, a senior Karabakh security official, and Prime Minister 
Nikol Pashinian’s press secretary, Vladimir Karapetian. Balasanian criticized 
the Armenian authorities for not heeding the current and former Karabakh 
presidents’ appeals.
Mirzoyan, who is a key Pashinian ally, dismissed talk of mounting tensions 
between the authorities in Yerevan and Stepanakert. But he did rebuke 
Balasanian, implying that the retired army general is already gearing up for a 
presidential election that will be held in Karabakh next year.
“I can understand that the pre-election period has already started in Artsakh 
but I would suggest that our partners don’t get ahead of events,” Mirzoyan told 
at a joint news conference with Ghulian. “With regard Mr. Balasanian’s 
statements, I would call for statements made in front of TV cameras to match 
assurances made in the absence of TV cameras.”
U.S. Envoy Hails Democratic Change In Armenia
        • Sargis Harutyunyan
Armenia -- U.S. Ambassador Lynne Tracy addresses members of the American 
Chamber of Commerce in Yerevan, .
Armenia has become more democratic than ever before since last year’s mass 
protests that brought down its former government, the U.S. ambassador in 
Yerevan, Lynne Tracy, said on Wednesday.
Tracy praised the current Armenian authorities for holding “free, fair and 
democratic” parliamentary elections in December and combatting corruption.
“I don’t need to tell you that democracy in Armenia is stronger than ever,” she 
said, addressing members the American Chamber of Commerce in Armenia (AmCham). 
“And as the events of last spring showed us, change starts with and is driven 
by Armenians.”
“I plan to continue to support the Armenian people as they make choices to 
develop and solidify their democracy in a way that bolsters the rule of law and 
protects human dignity,” she said.
“I am especially encouraged by the government’s efforts to root out corruption 
and promote transparency,” Tracy went on. “This will help level the playing 
field and signal to the international community that Armenia is a country that 
respects the rule of law and is open for business. This is particularly 
important given the strong potential for improved U.S.-Armenian economic 
relationship.”
In a September 2018 letter to Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, U.S. President 
Donald Trump praised the “velvet revolution” and expressed readiness to help 
the new Armenian government implement sweeping reforms promised by it. U.S. 
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo similarly saluted the “remarkable changes” in 
Armenia.
Belgium - U.S. President Donald Trump and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian talk during a NATO summit in Brussels, 11 July 2018.
Pashinian complained in March, however, about Washington’s “zero reaction” to 
democratic change in his country. He seemed unhappy with the fact that there 
has been no significant increase in U.S. economic assistance to Yerevan since 
the revolution which brought him to power.
Tracy countered afterwards that in 2018 the United States provided $26.7 
million in assistance to Armenia in addition to an ongoing $66 million aid 
program implemented by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
The U.S. ambassador again cited these figures in her latest speech. She also 
emphasized that overall U.S. assistance to the South Caucasus nation has 
totaled over $2 billion since 1992. And she confirmed that Washington will 
allocate up to $16 million in fresh aid to Yerevan this year.
U.S. and Armenian government delegations announced an agreement on that aid 
allocation last week after holding talks in Yerevan described by them as 
“strategic dialogue.” The U.S. delegation was led by Deputy Assistant Secretary 
of State George Kent. Tracy described the talks as “fruitful and frank.”
Armenia’s Ties With Russia, West ‘Not Mutually Exclusive’
U.S. - Armenian soldiers are trained at a Kansas National Guard facility in 
Salina in July 2017.
The alliance with Russia does not prevent Armenia from forging close ties with 
the United States and the European Union, a senior U.S. diplomat insisted on 
Wednesday.
“We understand that as a reality of geography and history Armenia maintains 
strong ties to Russia,” said U.S. Ambassador Lynne Tracy. “But I think most 
Armenians agree with me that the Armenian-Russian relationship should not and 
does not preclude Armenia from also pursuing strong, mutually beneficial 
relations with the United States, the European Union, and other partners.”
“And while Armenia’s geography and history link it to Russia, your values 
connect you to the West,” Tracy stressed in a speech delivered in Yerevan.
“These relationships are not mutually exclusive. Foreign affairs is not a 
zero-sum game,” she added, echoing statements made by her predecessor, Richard 
Mills.
Armenia - Russian soldiers march in an Armenian military parade in Yerevan, 
21Sep2016.
Successive governments in Yerevan have sought to complement Armenia’s 
membership in Russian-led defense and trade blocs with close partnership with 
the Western powers. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian has essentially stuck to 
this foreign policy strategy since he came to power one year ago. He had 
previously called for Armenia’s withdrawal from the Eurasian Economic Union.
Tracy said that although Washington and Yerevan “do not agree on everything” 
they deal with issues of mutual interest through an “open and honest dialogue.” 
She praised Armenia’s continuing participation in the NATO-led missions in 
Afghanistan and Kosovo.
The envoy also made clear that the U.S. will continue to work together with 
Russia in trying to broker a peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh 
conflict. The two nations as well as France co-chair the Minsk Group of the 
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
“Today I am more encouraged than ever with the Minsk Group process,” Tracy said 
in reference to high-level Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations held in the last 
several months. “It has been a long road and there are no easy solutions. But 
the events of recent months have led me to believe that progress is possible.”
Press Review
“Zhamanak” reports that the current and former presidents of Nagorno-Karabakh 
have “redirected” their calls for former President Robert Kocharian’s release 
from Armenia’s Prosecutor-General Artur Davtian to a court in Yerevan. In their 
letter to Davtian, they said Kocharian should be able to attend the May 9 
celebrations of Karabakh’s main public holiday. The paper calls that argument 
an “emotional ploy,” saying that the Karabakh leaders continued to seek 
Kocharian’s release even after the celebrations. They are simply showing 
“political support for their friend or partner,” it says.
“Aravot” says the appeal to Davtian was “wrong from both the legal and 
political standpoints.” “By law, only the court can make such a decision, and 
yesterday the leaders of Artsakh seemingly corrected that mistake by presenting 
a guarantee to the court,” writes the paper. “As far as politics is concerned, 
Armenian public opinion is presently very hostile to Kocharian and our citizens 
have reason to have such sentiment.” The paper is also critical of what it sees 
as Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s decision to “threaten Karabakh’s leadership 
with a revolution.” “We all should be interested in stability in the Republic 
of Artsakh,” it says.
“Zhoghovurd” reports that top European Union officials and the foreign 
ministers of ex-Soviet states involved in the EU’s Eastern Partnership program 
failed to adopt a joint statement after meeting in Brussels earlier this week. 
“Baku refused to sign the declaration because it made no mention of 
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity,” explains the paper. “This principle was 
mentioned in [Eastern Partnership] documents adopted previously. But this time 
European leader rejected Baku’s demands and worded the document the way they 
had planned to.” The paper claims that the EU did not reckon with Armenia’s 
position on the issue until now because the former Armenian authorities “had no 
legitimacy” and were regarded as corrupt. “It was easy for international 
organizations to exert pressure on them,” it says. “The situation has changed 
since the velvet revolution.”
(Lilit Harutiunian)
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2019 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org

Calendar of Events – 05/16/2019

                        Armenian News's Calendar of events
                        (All times local to events)
                =========================================
What:           "A Cultural Performance for May 28th Independence Day by 
Armenian Youth"
                with the participation of Vahan and Anoush Chamlian School 
Students
When:           May 23 2019 7:30pm
Where:          Armenian Apostolic Church of Crescenta Valley
                Western Prelacy's Hall, 6252 Honolulu Ave., La Crescenta, CA
Misc:           The students will present May 28th Armenian Independence
                historical events, with appropriate recitals and group songs.
                The event is free of charge to the public. There will be a
                reception at the end of the program.
Tel:            818-244-9639
                =========================================
What:           Event dedicated to "Iraqi Armenian Educational Institutions"
When:           Mar 24 2019 4:30pm
Where:          St. Gregory Armenian Catholic Cathedral's Hall
                1510 E. Mountain St. Glendale, CA 91207
Misc:           With a high sense of gratitude to our Iraqi national Schools
                and educators, we have organized an event dedicated to "Iraqi
                Armenian Educational Institutions" under sponsorship of the
                Hamazkayin USA Western Region.
                Participating in the event are our youth with recited poem, who
                had received their Armenian education in Iraq, Singers, the
                screening of Iraqi Armenian Schools history video, former
                principals and teachers eyewitness testimony video, and remark
                of the Hamazkayin Board member.
                The event is free of charge to the public. There will be a
                reception at the end of the program.
Tel:            818-244-9639
                =========================================
What:           Armenian Economic Association 2019 Annual Meetings
When:           Jun 27 2019 10am
                to Jun 29 2019 7pm
Where:          Armenian State University of Economics, 
                the Armenian National Agrarian University, and the American
                University of Armenia
Misc:           Scholars, researchers, and graduate students are invited to
                present their research in all areas of economics and finance. 
                No cost to present or attend.
Online Contact: [email protected]
Web:            
***************************************************************************
Armenian News's calendar of events is collected and updated mostly from
announcements posted on this list, and submissions to Armenian [email protected].
To submit, send to Armenian [email protected], and please note the following
important points:
a) Armenian News's administrators have final say on what may be included in
        Armenian News's calendar of events.
b) Posting time will is on Thursdays, 06:00 US Pacific time, to squeeze in
        a final reminder before weekend activities kick in.
c) Calendar items are short, functional, and edited to fit a template.
d) There is no guarantee or promise that an item will be published on time.
e) Calendar information is believed to be from reliable sources. However,
        no responsibility by the List's Administation or by USC is assumed
        for inaccuracies and there is no guarantee that the information is
        up-to-date.
f) No commercial events will be accepted.
        (Dinners, dances, forget it. This is not an ad-space.)
g) Armenian News is a non-commercial, non-partisan, pan-Armenian outlet.
*******************************************************************
    The Critical Corner
    The Literary Armenian News
    Review & Outlook
    World News
    The Entertainment Wire
    Probing the Photographic Record
    Armenia House Museums
    ...and much more
© Copyright 2019,  Armenian News Network / Armenian News, all rights reserved.
Regards,
--
Armenian News Network / Armenian News
Los Angeles, CA     / USA

Baghdad: President Saleh: Armenians Are An Essential Component Of The Iraqi Social Fabric

National Iraqi News Agency (NINA)
Tuesday
President Saleh: Armenians Are An Essential Component Of The Iraqi Social Fabric
 
 
BAGHDAD / NINA /-President Barham Salih affirmed that Armenians are an essential component of the Iraqi social fabric.
 
A presidential statement said, “Saleh received at al-Salam Palace in Baghdad on Tuesday Avak Asadourian, President of the Armenian Orthodox Church in Iraq and his accompanying delegation, praising their determination to uphold their national identity and peaceful coexistence with the rest of the components, expressing his readiness to support the legitimate demands of them in a free and dignified life with the rest of the people.”
 
In turn, Archbishop Asadurian expressed his appreciation for the role played by the President of the Republic in order to bring all Iraqi components closer together and enhance the spirit of national understanding.
 
During the meeting, they discussed the need to pay greater attention to the Armenian role in the legislative and executive institutions. / End