Category: 2019
Sports: European Championships: Armenia’s Hrachya Poghosyan loses semifinal
Five Armenian Greco-Roman wrestlers performed on the first day of the Junior European Championships taking place in Pontevedra, Spain.
Hrachya Poghosyan (63 kg) made it to the semifinal after claiming three victories. In a fight for the final he competed with Turk Abdulah Toprak but lost 3-4. Hrachya Poghosyan will today wrestle for a bronze medal, the National Olympic Committee reports.
After a victorious start Gevorg Sukiasyan (55 kg) lost the quarter-final to Georgian Pridon Abduladze who reached the final. Sukiasyan will fight for bronze today.
Hakob Baghdasaryan (87 kg) and Samvel Simonyan (130 kg) lost the first bouts and left the struggle. Vahe Poghosyan (77 kg) suffered defeat after starting with a win.
Sahak Hovhannisyan (60 kg), Hayk Melikyan (67 kg), Malkhas Amoyan (72 kg) and Karen Khachatryan (82 kg) have also left for the tournament with the Armenia Greco-Roman junior team.
Sports: Armenian boxers win 8 medals in Georgia
Sports: Karen Khachanov advances to Grand Slam quarterfinals for first time
Judge examining complaint of Kocharyan’s lawyer recuses himself
Judge examining complaint of Kocharyan’s lawyer recuses himself
20:28, 3 June, 2019
YEREVAN, JUNE 3, ARMENPRESS. Judge of the Court of Appeal of Armenia Vazgen Rshtuni, who examines the complaint against the decision of the court of 1st instance not to drop criminal charges against Robert Kocharyan on the grounds of immunity, has recused himself.
ARMENPRESS reports head of the investigative group on March 1 case Hrach Musheghyan had submitted a motion for the judge to recuse himself. The reason for the investigator to submit a motion for recuse is the position of the mentioned judge on Kocharyan’s case which he had expressed in the past.
The March 1 case refers to the 2008 post-presidential election unrest in Yerevan when eight protesters and two security officers were killed in clashes during large demonstrations against alleged vote rigging. Kocharyan was the outgoing president at that time. He is accused of unlawfully ordering the military to interfere and disperse the protests.
Robert Kocharyan is charged with “overthrowing Constitutional order” and “accepting particularly large bribe”.
Other indicted officials are: ex-Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan (overthrowing Constitutional order). In 2008 Ohanyan served as Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces; Yuri Khachaturov (overthrowing Constitutional order). In 2008, Khachaturov was the Deputy Minister of Defense; Armen Gevorgyan (conspiracy to overthrow Constitutional order, accepting particularly large bribe and money laundering). Gevorgyan served as Chief of Staff of the Presidential Administration. Gevorgyan’s most recent government position was Deputy Prime Minister.
Yuri Khachaturov is an Armenian general who served as Secretary General of the CSTO until being recalled by Armenia for criminal proceedings in 2018.
They all deny wrongdoing.
Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan
A1+: Syrian-Armenian convinces his Armenian wife which country’s cuisine is the best
Asbarez: 4th Class of Students Graduate from UWC Dilijan
DILIJAN, Armenia—UWC Dilijan celebrates the graduation of its 4th class of graduates—104 international students. With this, the school sends 104 young ambassadors with a knowledge of, and connection to, Armenia into the world.
Founding Partner and Chair of the Board of Governors of UWC Dilijan Veronika Zonabend, Member of the Board of Governors of UWC Dilijan, President of the Board of Directors of the Free University of Brussels Pierre Gurdjian, his excellency ambassador of Armenia to Japan Hrant Poghosyan, Professor of Paro College of Education, Bhutan, Kinzang Lhendup will be present at the graduation ceremony. Donors, community and guests from all over the world will arrive in Dilijan to celebrate the special day with students. The graduation is the culmination of series of events that take place on May 31 and June 1, including a tree planting ceremony and a thank you event for donors.
“Graduations are emotional landmarks in all schools. At UWC Dilijan, our soon-to-be-graduates have an additional emotional layer, as most of them will leave Armenia, a country that has been their home for two years. One could argue that Armenia now has a new cohort of ambassadors from all over the world. Graduations are also a moment of pausing to take stock of the progress made and to celebrate the successes and the failures, as they all are learning opportunities. We are very proud of each of our students’ individual paths and cannot wait to see what they will achieve as they follow their passions,” stated Gabriel Ernesto Abad Fernandez, Head of UWC DIlijan College
“I literally started from nothing. Before this I never traveled abroad, and everything happening was a challenge for me. I could not even speak proper English and the language barrier was immense for me. However, not giving up and doing my best to succeed paid off. Not everyone has been given a chance to study at this amazing school, let alone on a full scholarship, like me. This made me proud and at the same time I felt like I had no chance to let those people down. People who had faith in me, and believed in me. UWC Dilijan gave me the chance to become the person that I dreamt to be. We here are as a one big family. Caring for each other, helping each other and holding each other when the times are tough. I am endlessly grateful as this has been the experience of my life. I know that everything I learnt from here is going to guide me throughout my life, no matter where I find myself in the future,“ said Aido, a UWCD class of 2019 graduate from Iraq. He is the first recipient of an annual Lamiya Haji Bashar Scholarship
The graduating class’ students come from 61 countries, with 79% of graduates on scholarships supported by the generosity of donors. Students are accepted based on merit, and not the ability of their families to afford tuition. Some of the current scholarships are named after Lamya Haji Bashar, Amal Clooney and Charles Aznavour.
Asbarez: Artsakh Soldier Killed by Azerbaijani Fire
Private of the Artsakh Defense Army Sipan Melkonyan (born in 2000) was killed by Azerbaijani fire
Private of the Artsakh Defense Army Sipan Melkonyan (born in 2000) was killed by Azerbaijani fire at about 7:30 a.m. on Saturday, the Artsakh Defense Ministry reported.
The incident took place in the southeastern border of Artsakh-Azerbaijan in Martuni.
The defense ministry has launched an official investigation.
Artsakh President Bako Sahakian posthumously awarded Melkonyan the Medal for Service in Battle in recognition of his bravery during the defense of the Artsakh’s state border.
Melkonyan’s killing, once again, brought the long dormant issue of the need for mechanisms to monitor and control ceasefire violation, a topic that was widely discussed following the April 2016 War.
The Artsakh foreign ministry issued a statement condemning Melkonyan’s killing and also warning about Azerbaijan’s disinformation campaign whereby on May 30 Baku falsely claimed that Artsakh forces had killed an Azerbaijani soldier. Azerbaijan’s claim was immediately refuted by the Artsakh defense ministry.
“On June 1, the Azerbaijan blatantly violated the cease-fire regime, as a result of which a serviceman of the Artsakh Defence Army was killed. This premeditated killing was preceded by a disinformation campaign with fabricated accusations against Artsakh of alleged shooting of positions of the Azerbaijani army, which allegedly resulted in the death of an Azerbaijani serviceman,” said the Artsakh foreign ministry statement.
“It is evident that this disinformation campaign by Azerbaijan aimed to create the necessary background for the subsequent violation of the cease-fire. Both episodes are links in the same chain and may indicate Azerbaijan’s unwillingness to comply with its obligations to strengthen the cease-fire,” observed the Artsakh foreign ministry.
“The attempt by the Azerbaijan to initiate an escalation of tension serves as yet another example of the urgency to introduce an international mechanism to control the cease-fire in the Karabakh conflict zone. As part of these efforts, it is necessary to finally start the implementation of the agreements reached in Vienna and St. Petersburg in 2016 on investigating possible cease-fire violations, as well as on expansion of the office of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office with a view to increasing their monitoring capacities,” said the Artsakh foreign ministry, which added that such a mechanism will allow a prompt response to violations, curtail mutual accusation of ceasefire violations and prevent the escalation of tension under false pretenses.
Armenia’s foreign ministry echoed the need for the monitoring mechanism and reiterated Yerevan’s commitment to the Karabakh peace process.
“The proposal to establish an atmosphere conducive to peace came from Armenia. Therefore, the Armenian side cannot turn down its own offer. Armenia and Artsakh are loyal to their commitments,” said Armenian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Anna Naghdalyan.
She said it would be impossible to disseminate disinformation had an investigation mechanism been in place. She reminded that the mechanism has not been implemented because of Azerbaijan.
“By disseminating fake news, Baku is trying to lay the burden of its non-constructive policy on Armenia and Artsakh,” said Naghdalyan referring to Azerbaijan’s false claim of an attack by Artsakh forces.
The California Courier Online, June 6, 2019
1 – Azerbaijan May be Expelled from Council
Of Europe for Violating Court Ruling
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com
2- Europa League final: Arsenal fans wearing
Mkhitaryan shirts stopped by Baku police
3 – Manoukian Memorial Unveiled During May 28 Celebrations
4- Anti-Pashinyan Facebook group forms new political party
5- Three Decades of Impropriety Comes to a Close
*****************************************
******************************************
1 – Azerbaijan May be Expelled from Council
Of Europe for Violating Court Ruling
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com
All members of the European Council had agreed to comply with
judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). However,
Azerbaijan has violated that commitment ever since 2014, according to
the unanimous ruling of ECHR’s Grand Chamber of 17 judges, including
the judge representing Azerbaijan, on May 29, 2019.
The case involves Azerbaijan’s imprisonment of political activist
Ilgar Mammadov who was charged with criminal offenses and placed “in
pre-trial detention in 2013 without there being any reasonable
suspicion that he had committed an offense. [The European] Court
considered the circumstances indicated the actual purpose of those
measures was to silence or punish Mammadov for criticizing the
Government [of Azerbaijan],” according to a press release by ECHR.
ECHR “found in particular that the Government [of Azerbaijan] had
taken only limited steps to implement the judgment, which had not
amounted to Azerbaijan acting in ‘good faith’ or in a manner which was
in accordance with the ‘conclusions and spirit’ of its ruling in
Mammadov’s case. It concluded that Azerbaijan had failed to fulfill
its obligation under the Convention to abide by the judgment,”
according to ECHR’s press release.
On December 5, 2017, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of
Europe, which is responsible for supervising the enforcement of the
ECHR’s judgments, referred Azerbaijan’s violation back to European
Court to determine whether that country had failed to abide by its
2014 judgment by not releasing Mammadov unconditionally.
After ECHR’s Grand Chamber ruled on May 29, 2019 that Azerbaijan had
indeed violated its 2014 judgment, ECHR referred the case back to the
Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for consideration of
further measures to be taken.
The Committee of Ministers stressed that there were fundamental flaws
in the criminal proceedings against Mammadov and “called many times
for Azerbaijan to release Mammadov as an essential step towards
redressing the violations the [European] Court had found. However, he
remained in detention for almost four years after the ECHR’s judgment
had become final on 13 October 2014, until his conditional release on
13 August 2018, following the initiation of the infringement
proceedings. In March 2019 [Azerbaijan’s] Supreme Court, after
reducing his sentence, found he had served his time in full and set
aside the probation order and other conditions on his release,”
according to ECHR’s Grand Chamber.
Here is the background of Mammadov’s case as described by ECHR’s press
release: He was born in 1970 and lives in Baku. He is a political
blogger and activist who had also announced his intention to run as
president of Azerbaijan in 2013. He was placed in pre-trial detention
in February 2013 after writing on his blog about disturbances in
Ismayilli. Mammadov said, among other things, that people there had
been reacting to the “corruption and insolence” of public officials.
He was subsequently charged with organizing or actively participating
in actions causing a breach of public order, and later he was accused
of stirring mass disorder and resistance to or violence against public
officials, posing a threat to their life or health.
Mammadov applied to ECHR on February 25, 2013, alleging that he had
been arrested and detained without a “reasonable suspicion” of a
criminal offence; that his right to be presumed innocent had been
breached; and that he had been prosecuted for his political views and
the threat he had presented to the regime as a potential presidential
candidate. In March 2014, Azerbaijan’s court convicted and sentenced
him to seven years in prison.
In the Grand Chamber’s judgment of May 22, 2014 (the first Mammadov
judgment) ECHR found violations of his right to liberty and security,
right to judicial review of detention, presumption of innocence, and
limitation on use of restrictions on rights. The ECHR also ordered the
government of Azerbaijan to pay him 20,000 euros in compensation.
The Committee of Ministers first examined the case in December 2014.
It took numerous decisions and interim resolutions, highlighting the
State’s obligation under the Convention to adopt individual measures
to put an end to any violations that had been established and to erase
their consequences so as to put Mammadov in the position he would have
been in if his rights had not been violated.
In October 2017, the Committee put Azerbaijan on formal notice that,
in its view, it had failed to fulfill its obligation under the
Convention, the first step in an infringement procedure. The Committee
of Ministers in December 2017 also referred a question to ECHR on
Azerbaijan’s fulfillment of its obligation.
Mammadov was freed on probation in August 2018. In March 2019,
Azerbaijan’s Supreme Court reduced his sentence, found he had served
his time in full and set aside the conditions on his release. In
November 2017, ECHR found that Mammadov’s trial on the same criminal
charges as those criticized in its 2014 judgment had also violated his
rights (the second Mammadov judgment).
If Azerbaijan continues not to comply with ECHR’s judgments, it may
eventually be expelled from the Council of Europe.
************************************************************************************************************************************************
2- Europa League final: Arsenal fans wearing
Mkhitaryan shirts stopped by Baku police
By Tom Kershaw
Footage has emerged showing Azerbaijani police stopping Arsenal fans
wearing Henrikh Mkhitaryan shirts on the streets in Baku, ahead of the
Europa League final against Chelsea.
Mkhitaryan chose not to travel with the Arsenal squad due to fears for
his safety, owing to his native Armenia’s conflict with Azerbaijan,
despite the local FA insisting he would be safe to make the trip.
Speaking ahead of the match, both Granit Xhaka and Sokratis
Papastathopoulos said that Mkhitaryan’s absence had provided them with
extra motivation to win the Europa League in his honor, while Bernd
Leno claimed the situation was a “scandal” earlier this week.
“Of course we are disappointed he’s not here but I think we spoke a
lot about Mkhitaryan, and a lot of political things, and it’s time to
speak about football,” Xhaka said on Tuesday. “He’s very important for
us, and we want to give him a trophy tomorrow. We’ve been twice in a
row in the Europa League, and a club like Arsenal has to be in the
Champions League. It’s an amazing and important game for us, because
we want to give the club and the fans the Champions League back.”
Sokratis, who wrote a social media post in support of Mkhitaryan’s
decision, added: “We’ve had five or six years together, I know him
very well, we are good friends. So I just wrote what I feel. But we
have also to play for him and for the players who are injured, and
tomorrow if we win this game, it’s also for them.”
***************************************************************************************************
3 – Manoukian Memorial Unveiled During May 28 Celebrations
The highlight of this year’s celebrations marking the 101st
anniversary of Armenia’s Independence was the unveiling of monument
dedicated to the founder of the republic Aram Manoukian at the
Sardarabad Memorial Complex outside of Yerevan.
The Aram Manoukian monument, dedicated to the republic founder’s
birthday is strategically placed near the Sardarabad monument, with a
sword, the eagle and the eternity sign as its symbols. The building of
the monument was organized by the Armenian Revolutionary Federation,
which worked with the National Museum of Ethnography and Liberation
War History in Sardarabad.
Members of the ARF celebrated the unveiling with ARF Bureau and
Supreme Council of Armenia leaders leading the pilgrimage to
Sardarabad.
The project was initiated by the ARF Canada region, with one of its
members from Toronto, Varouj Lapoyan sponsoring the entire cost of the
construction. The almost 20-foot high monument was designed by
architect Hayk Asatryan and executed by sculptor Artak Hambardzumyan
Earlier on Tuesday, together with President Armen Sarkissian, His
Holiness Karekin II, Catholicos of All Armenia and other high-ranking
government officials, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan headed the
official celebration of the independence at Sardarabad.
After laying wreaths at the memorial for the fallen heroes of
Sardarabad, the official delegation headed to the site of the monument
dedicated to the 140th birthday of Republic founder Aram Manoukian for
the inauguration ceremony.
The government delegation also attended an exhibit, “Formation of
First Armenian Republic and History of Heroic Battles of
Independence,” which opened at the National Museum of Ethnography and
Liberation War History in Sardarabad.
*****************************************************************************************************
4- Anti-Pashinyan Facebook group forms new political party
By Ani Mejlumyan
Armenia’s newest political party has been born out of a nationalist,
conservative social media platform that portrays the new government as
a threat to Armenian identity and values.
The Facebook-group-turned-party, Adekvad, announced its intention to
enter politics in a May 27 post. “Since the political system is
currently handicapped and is absolutely not viable to solve the issues
the country faces, we urgently need to call on a political entity that
will resolutely stand against the risks that challenge our statehood,”
the post read. It used common anti-globalist imagery, evoking “the
notion of an unassailable fortress” and warning that, under its
current trajectory, Armenia could “melt with the majority and vanish
in the haze of history.”
The Adekvad Facebook page was launched in June 2018 and quickly became
popular, with more than 27,000 followers, and known for its
nationalist, anti-Western and right-wing stances. It has called the
fact that many of Armenia’s young elite have been educated or trained
in the United States “the second stage of the genocide.” Other
favorite targets include Armenia’s LGBT minority and financier and
philanthropist George Soros. But the most frequent target is Prime
Minister Nikol Pashinyan for the fact that he has allegedly opened the
door to all those influences on Armenia.
One of the leading members of the group, however, used to be an ally
of Pashinyan, a strategist for the prime minister’s Civil Contract
party. In an April interview on Kentron TV, Artur Danielyan said that
he left the party over philosophical differences with Pashinyan. “I
was with Civil Contract for a year and, in the beginning we had
agreement that the party will not have a dominant leader and during
our last meeting I told him that he lied to me, that’s it,” he said.
Among other prominent members are Narek Malyan, a former adviser to
former chief of police Vladimir Gasparyan, who regularly criticizes
Pashinyan on law-and-order issues; and Konstantin Nakalyan, founder of
the tabloid website blognews.am.
Inevitably, Adekvad has been accused of conspiring with Russia. The
Washington-based think tank Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic
Research lab published an article suggesting that Adekvad and another
affiliated site, antifake.am, were part of Russia’s influence
operations based solely on the fact that the website’s IP address is
registered in St. Petersburg. (It’s not uncommon for Armenian news
sites to be registered abroad.) Adekvad responded conspiratorially,
suggesting that they would soon be blocked along with other “right
information sources” whose “political views don’t match with those of
Facebook’s leadership.”
In recent months, Adekvad has moved from cyberspace to the streets.
They launched a campaign to get supporters to spray-paint “#SutNikol”
– “#LiarNikol” – around Armenia, and organized a contest, “Who can
present the prime minister’s biggest lie through art!?”
There have even been physical clashes. In March, Malyan was attacked
by members of a pro-Pashinyan student group, “Restart,” who accosted
him in Yerevan and attempted to throw him into a garbage can. In May,
a member of Civil Contract, Arthur Ispiryan, claims that he was
accosted in a café near Yerevan’s Cascade by a group of people
including Danielyan.
As a new party with no power, Adekvad will have no tangible
opportunities to make real change. But they can nevertheless present a
challenge to Pashinyan: they have not been tarnished by previous turns
in government, in contrast to other opposition parties like the
Republican Party or the Armenian Revolutionary Federation. And they
speak a social media-friendly language attractive to young people,
including the Facebook live videos that Pashinyan himself has used to
great effect.
Ani Mejlumyan is a reporter based in Yerevan.
This article appeared in Eurasianet on May 29, 2019.
**********************************************************************************************************************************************
5- Three Decades of Impropriety Comes to a Close
On April 25, The Improper Bostonian publisher Wendy Semonian Eppich
announced in a letter on the magazine’s website that the magazine
would cease publication. “After nearly 28 years in business, we are
closing The Improper Bostonian effective today. While this news might
be surprising, the company has had a great run and we’re hopefully
leaving this incredible city better and brighter since our inception
in 1991,” wrote Semonian Eppich.
“A special thanks to my family, our ownership: Thank you for believing
in The Improper Bostonian and all of its employees from the beginning,
and for providing incredible support. Mark Semonian, our founder:
Thank you for creating and conceiving something that is such an
important part of the fabric of our city,” she wrote.
“Improper staff, past and present: Thank you for all of your hard
work. You amaze me every day and are smart, creative, kind, humble,
loyal, fun and fabulous. You’ve been an absolute joy along this
Improper journey. In the business world, a company is only as good as
the people you work with—and I feel fortunate and appreciative to have
worked with all of you. Your fingerprints have left a lasting
impression on The Improper brand,” she wrote.
“Our partners and vendors: Thank you for your invaluable help along
the way. Our advertisers: Thank you for believing in The Improper and
trusting us with the chance to promote your business. We have enjoyed
many memorable collaborations throughout the years. Our loyal readers:
Thank you for picking us up every two weeks and putting us on your
coffee tables—or in recent years, for also clicking on our website. It
has been a pleasure to entertain, inspire, inform and amuse you. Our
staff was always delighted when you shared your love and passion for
the brand. Your feedback gave us a lot of pride in what we did and
motivated us to continue doing it,” wrote Semonian Eppich.
“As you remember The Improper, try to think of how you can enrich the
lives of others while celebrating and enjoying life in this wonderful
city—something we are fond of doing ourselves,” wrote Semonian Eppich,
in closing.
In August 1991, Mark Semonian published the first issue of The
Improper Bostonian. After coming up with the name and a million ideas,
Mark gathered a team of young, smart individuals, and a magazine was
born in a loft in Brookline Village.
In 2003, Wendy Semonian Eppich, Mark’s sister, became publisher of the
magazine, which was headquartered in the Pledge of Allegiance building
in the Back Bay. Twenty-eight years after its founding, The Improper
became a local institution that reached an audience of more than
426,000 readers, with 24 issues a year covering everything from food
and fashion to arts and entertainment, highlighting what makes Boston
a world-class city.
**********************************************************************************************************************************************
California Courier Online provides viewers of the Armenian News News Service
with a few of the articles in this week’s issue of The California
Courier. Letters to the editor are encouraged through our e-mail
address, However, authors are
requested to provide their names, addresses, and/or telephone numbers
to verify identity, if any question arises. California Courier
subscribers are requested not to use this service to change, or modify
mailing addresses. Those changes can be made through our e-mail,
, or by phone, (818) 409-0949.
RFE/RL Armenian Report – 06/03/2019
Monday,
Tsarukian Disavows Ally’s Support For Kocharian
• Ruzanna Stepanian
Armenia - Gyumri Mayor Vartan Ghukasian speaks at an event in 2012.
Gagik Tsarukian on Monday warned parliament deputies from his Prosperous
Armenia Party (BHK) against publicly expressing their personal opinions after
one of them voiced support for the indicted former President Robert Kocharian.
“I stand for freedom for Robert Kocharian,” the lawmaker, Vartan Ghukasian,
said late last week amid continuing political fallout from an Armenian court’s
May 18 decision to free the ex-president from custody.
The statement led Tsarukian to hold an emergency meeting of the BHK’s
parliamentary group, the second largest in the National Assembly.
“For that reason I held today a meeting during which I warned everyone that
nobody has the right to express their personal opinion,” the BHK leader told
reporters. BHK deputies should make public statements on various issues only if
the opposition party formulates a position on them, he said.
A senior BHK figure, Naira Zohrabian, stressed that Ghukasian’s remark does not
reflect the party line. “That is Mr. Ghukasian’s personal opinion, and I can
reaffirm today that it is not the BHK faction’s opinion,” she said.
Zohrabian also told RFE/RL’s Armenian service that Ghukasian did not attend the
faction meeting chaired by Tsarukian.
Ghukasian, 58, served as mayor of Armenia’s second largest city of Gyumri
during and after Kocharian’s 1998-2008 presidency. He strongly supported the
ex-president who was arrested last year on charges stemming from the 2008
post-election violence in Yerevan.
Armenia - Former President Robert Kocharian (second from right) and Prosperous
Armenia Party leader Gagik Tsarukian at an awards ceremony organized for
prominent Armenian athletes near Yerevan, 26Dec2013.
Tsarukian likewise had a cordial rapport with Kocharian. But both he and his
party have sought to distance themselves from the latter since last spring’s
“velvet revolution” which brought Nikol Pashinian to power. They have pointedly
declined to criticize Kocharian’s prosecution as politically motivated.
“The BHK view is that in the new Armenia political processes must not be mixed
with legal processes,” said Zohrabian. “It’s a totally legal process. We want
to be sure that there is and there will be no political pressure on legal
processes.”
Tsarukian was irked on May 29 by a reporter’s remark that Kocharian had helped
him make a big fortune. “I don’t have obligations to anyone,” he stated in that
regard.
Deadly Truce Violations Reported In Karabakh
Nagorno-Karabakh -- Ethnic Armenian soldiers walk in a trench at their position
near Nagorno-Karabakh's boundary, April 8, 2016
Armenia and Azerbaijan have accused each other of trying to torpedo peace talks
on Nagorno-Karabakh after reporting the most serious ceasefire violations in
the Karabakh conflict zone in months.
The Azerbaijani military said on Thursday one of its servicemen, was shot and
killed by enemy fire near Karabakh. The victim identified as Aqil Omarov was
reportedly a mid-ranking officer.
The Foreign Ministry in Baku seized upon the reported incident to accuse
Armenia of seeking to scuttle more high-level negotiations planned by the two
sides.
Karabakh’s Armenian-backed Defense Army insisted that its troops did not breach
the ceasefire at any section of “the line of contact.” The army reported a
sharp rise in Azerbaijani truce violations on the night from Friday to
Saturday. One of its soldiers, Sipan Melkonian, died as a result.
In a weekend statement, Armenia’s Foreign Ministry accused Azerbaijan of
deliberately “escalating the situation” and said its actions represent a
“serious setback for all the efforts taken over the past months.” The statement
also questioned Baku’s commitment to confidence-building understandings reached
by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham
Aliyev.
Aliyev’s and Pashinian’s first face-to-face meeting held in Tajikistan in
September was followed by a significant decrease in ceasefire violations.
The Azerbaijani side brushed aside the “emotional” and “contradictory”
statement. It said Armenian “occupation of Azerbaijani lands” is the root cause
of the Karabakh conflict and resulting casualties.
The tensions around Karabakh rose as U.S., Russian and French mediators
co-heading the OSCE Minsk Group wrapped up their latest tour of the conflict
zone with a meeting with Aliyev held in Baku. “The Co-Chairs expressed deep
concern about recent casualties and called on the parties to exercise maximum
restraint to avoid escalation,” read a joint statement released by them.
Commenting on their talks in Yerevan, Stepanakert and Baku, the mediators said
they presented the conflicting parties with “proposals for concrete next steps
in the settlement process.” “The Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan
accepted the Co-Chairs’ proposal to meet soon under their auspices, and will
announce details at the appropriate time,” added their statement.
The date and venue of the ministers’ meeting has not been announced yet.
Judge Declines To Deal With Kocharian’s Immunity Claim
• Naira Nalbandian
Armenia -- Judge Vazgen Rshtuni holds a court hearing in Yerevan, June 3, 2019.
The chairman of Armenia’s Court of Appeals, Vazgen Rshtuni, accepted on Monday
prosecutors’ demand that he recuse himself from hearings on immunity from
prosecution claimed by former President Robert Kocharian.
Kocharian and his legal team cite an article of the Armenian constitution which
stipulates: “During the term of his or her powers and thereafter, the President
of the Republic may not be prosecuted and subjected to liability for actions
deriving from his or her status.”
Earlier this year they asked a district court in Yerevan to free the
ex-president and throw out coup charges brought against him in connection with
the 2008 post-election violence in Yerevan.
The court ruled on April 12, however, that Kocharian cannot be protected from
prosecution. It thus accepted prosecutors’ claims that the constitutional
provision does not apply to him because his actions in February-March 2008 were
illegal.
Kocharian and his lawyers appealed against that ruling before the case was
assigned to Rshtuni.
Hrach Musheghian, a senior law-enforcement official leading a probe of the 2008
violence, said last week that Rshtuni cannot be impartial because he publicly
approved of another Court of Appeals judge’s decision in August to free
Kocharian from custody and uphold his immunity from prosecution. The
prosecution backed Musheghian’s demand.
But one of Kocharian’s lawyers, Samvel Khudoyan, objected to it. “In my view,
the consideration of our appeal has nothing to do with the opinion expressed by
[Rshtuni,]” Khudoyan told RFE/RL’s Armenian service (Azatutyun.am) on Monday.
Nevertheless, Rshtuni agreed to have another judge consider and rule on the
appeal. He argued that “one of the parties to the trial lacks trust in me.”
Rshtuni also pointed to media allegations that he was instrumental in the May
18 decision by a district court judge, Davit Grigorian, to order Kocharian
released from prison pending a verdict in the high-profile case. Rshtuni, who
has strongly denied the allegations, said he wants to be exonerated by
“relevant bodies.”
Grigorian also controversially decided to suspend Kocharian’s trial which began
on May 13. He cited a “suspicion of discrepancy” between the Armenian
constitution and the charges. And he suggested that the constitution does give
the ex-president immunity from prosecution.
Parliament Panel To Investigate 2016 War In Karabakh
• Ruzanna Stepanian
Nagorno-Karabakh -- Ethnic Armenian soldiers stand next to a cannon at
artillery positions near the Nagorno-Karabakh's town of Martuni, April 7, 2016
The pro-government majority in Armenia’s National Assembly has set up an ad hoc
parliamentary commission tasked with investigating the April 2016 war in
Nagorno-Karabakh.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian called for the creation of such a commission on
May 20 as he lambasted the Armenian judiciary and accused it of having ties
with the country’s former leadership.
Pashinian claimed that “specific forces representing the former corrupt system”
are also “using their corrupt connections to carry out false propaganda”
against him in Karabakh. He suggested that they are intent on provoking a war
with Azerbaijan, losing “some territories” to the enemy and blaming that defeat
on his government.
Pashinian did not name anyone involved in the alleged conspiracy. He announced
instead that “the time has come to form an investigative parliamentary
commission to examine circumstances of the April 2016 war and find answers to a
number of questions preoccupying us.”
Some opposition politicians and other critics of the Armenian government
denounced Pashinian’s statement, saying that the prime minister is playing the
Karabakh card for domestic political purposes.
The commission was formally set up late last week after 47 deputies
representing Pashinian’s My Step alliance signed a petition in support of its
creation. It will be headed by Andranik Kocharian, the pro-government chairman
of a standing parliament committee on defense and security, and also comprise
10 other lawmakers.
The commission, which will hold its first meeting on Tuesday, is specifically
tasked with scrutinizing the Armenian military’s response to an Azerbaijani
offensive in Karabakh that led to the four-day hostilities, which left around
80 Armenian soldiers and volunteers dead. It will not only be able to question
senior government and military officials but also have access to classified
documents.
Four of the commission members are supposed to be named by the opposition
Prosperous Armenia (BHK) and Bright Armenia (LHK) parties.
Naira Zohrabian, a senior BHK parliamentarian, hit out at the parliament
majority on Monday, saying that it did not consult with her party before
setting up the special panel.
“Nobody from My Step approached us,” Zohrabian told RFE/RL’s Armenian service.
“Moreover, we learned from the media that the investigative commission has been
created by the signatures of 47 My Step deputies. I regard this as [a
manifestation of] a non-businesslike atmosphere in the parliament.”
My Step’s parliamentary leader, Lilit Makunts, dismissed the criticism. She
said that the parliament majority has followed legal procedures and
requirements regulating the formation of such commissions.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2019 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org