Verelq: Who is for and who is against, but not Nikol Pashinyan, but the resolution of the crisis?

  • 01.05.2018
  •  

  • Armenia:
  •  

12
 1051

A little while ago, the discussions on the election of the RA Prime Minister ended in the National Assembly. The representatives of the NA factions also held a meeting, presenting their position on how they will vote, for or against Nikol Pashinyan.


SIDE: Armen Rustamyan, ARF faction leader

I have to refer to Aghvan Vardanyan’s statement, which was a surprise for his faction. Of course, we respect his decision, but this is Dashnaktsutyun, and we will certainly evaluate that behavior.


And the position of Dashnaktsutyun is the same and unchanged: we will vote in favor of Nikol Pashinyan. We must reach such a solution that will benefit the Armenian people in Armenia and the Diaspora. 



SIDE: Mikael Melkumyan, “Tsarukyan” faction


We record that the extent of the mistake of the current authorities is such that he cannot stay, he must leave. We are standing on the edge of a watershed, if we make a mistake today we will be thrown back a decade. The Tsarukyan bloc has joined the popular movement and will vote for Nikol Pashinyan.


AGAINST: Vahram Baghdasaryan, Republican faction

Political decisions are not made through ultimatums, blackmails, curses. We have accepted the victory of the people, we agree with the criticisms, we have taken into account the people’s movement. We recognize that a grassroots movement can support any candidate. But the Republican faction will vote against the issue of Nikol Pashinyan becoming the prime minister, trying to stop the dangerous wave that will be born in our country. 


Ara Babloyan, Speaker of the National Assembly, RPA party, extraordinary speech


What we all want is that we definitely have to do things smoothly and smoothly. During the recent discussions of political forces, both positive and negative phenomena in the country came to light. At the same time, all the criticisms that were also voiced by the RPA members prove that without eliminating these shortcomings, the situation can be improved and the country’s progress ensured. It is a fact that today we are in a political crisis and it should be solved in a peaceful and acceptable way for everyone.


Mr. Pashinyan, instead of dialogue, you want to oppress and defeat the parliamentary majority. As a skilled politician, how do you imagine getting votes without dialogue? I am convinced that we must continue to move forward on the path of political negotiations, outlining a tomorrow without tsunamis and upheavals.


Verelq: RPA members came out against. Nikol Pashinyan was not elected Prime Minister of Armenia

  • 01.05.2018
  •  

  • Armenia:
  •  

     

48
 577

Voting on the election of the Prime Minister of Armenia ended on May 1 in the National Assembly.


Leader of the opposition nominated for the post of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan with the distribution of votes 45 in favor and 56 against, the RA Prime Minister was not elected.


Deputies of the faction of the ruling Republican Party voted against. The deputies of the opposition “Yelk”, “Tsarukyan” alliances and factions of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation spoke in favor.


So the leader of the opposition Nikol Pashinyan Prime Minister was not elected. 


It should be noted that the only deputy member of the RPA faction who voted for Nikol Pashinyan is the former governor of Shirak. Felix Tsolakyan is


Speaker of the National Assembly Ara Babloyan announced that the next discussion on the issue of the RA Prime Minister will take place in the National Assembly in 7 days. 


It should be noted that according to the Constitution, in case of not confirming the candidacy of the prime minister for the second time, the National Assembly must be dissolved and extraordinary elections must be held.


ARF GM demands Aghvan Vardanyan to resign his parliamentary mandate

  • 01.05.2018
  •  

  • Armenia:
  •  

83
 459

The Supreme Body of the ARF of Armenia informs that the opinion expressed today by ARF faction deputy Aghvan Vardanyan in the RA National Assembly is a personal decision and does not correspond to H.Y. To the official position of the Federation.


A gross disciplinary violation has been committed, which will be the subject of an investigation.


According to that, the General Assembly of ARF Armenia demands Aghvan Vardanyan to resign his parliamentary mandate early.


To remind, Vardanyan announced that he will not vote for Nikol Pashinyan.


Armenian Opposition Leader Calls for Strike as He Fails to Become Prime Minister

Sputnik, Russia
May 1 2018
© REUTERS / Gleb Garanich
World

Armenian opposition leader Nikol Pashinyan has not been elected as the country’s interim prime minister amid ongoing protests.

The National Assembly of Armenia failed to elect Nikol Pashinyan, the only candidate in the vote, for the post of prime minister.

Forty-three out of the 105 parliamentarians had supported Pahinyan, while he needed 53 votes to get elected. Lawmakers of the ruling Republican Party voted against the opposition leader’s candidacy, despite his warnings of a “political tsunami” in case he wasn’t elected.

Pashinyan, who has been at the helm of the weeks-long rallies in Armenia, has slammed the ruling party for its decision, calling it an “insult to the people.”

In a heated address after the vote, the opposition leader said a nationwide strike will be held on Wednesday. He called on people to block the streets, airports and railway stations, adding that the protests will be peaceful. Pashinyan also urged police to put down their shields and join his movement.

© AP Photo / Gleb Garanich

The vote was held amid protests in Armenia that have been ongoing for several weeks. Media reported that about 20,000 people took to the streets of the country’s capital, Yerevan, on Tuesday. The massive rallies started after the opposition protested against the nomination of ex-President Serzh Sargsyan as the head of the government. The opposition feared that after two terms as the president, Sargsyan was attempting to stay in power.

Briefing by Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova, Moscow, April 26, 2018

Russian Government News
Monday 10:16 AM EEST
Briefing by Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova, Moscow, April 26, 2018
 
[Armenian News note: parts not related to Armenia or Armenians have been omitted]

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s meeting with Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandyan

Today, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov had a short meeting with Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia Eduard Nalbandyan. Among other things, the officials discussed the situation on the line of contact between Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan.

Answers to media questions:

Question: You said that Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandyan discussed the situation on the line of contact. Did they discuss future interaction and cooperation between the two foreign ministries, given the events in Armenia?

Maria Zakharova: This question is both weird and scary. We maintain contact with Yerevan, communication has not been interrupted. Embassies continue to operate, both in Moscow and in Armenia’s capital. I cannot really understand what made you ask this question.

Question: Probably the changes in the Armenian leadership.

Maria Zakharova: We proceed from the fact that diplomats serve the people of Russia and the people of Armenia, for their benefit and well-being. It is not the people who have to adjust, but we, diplomats of all kinds, must think about how our countries and peoples live and develop, build a common future, given the historically friendly ties that we have.

Russia has done everything that it can to develop such ties for the benefit of the future. I think that we have nothing to be reproached of. We have fulfilled our obligations and continue to proceed on the basis of these obligations, in connection with the development of bilateral relations and also the regional problem, which is an open wound, for both Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Question: Could you specify whether the Foreign Ministry sees any prospects for settling the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in the near future?

Maria Zakharova: We have released a comment to this effect, and it remains relevant. Just like many countries in the region and across the world in general, we continue to follow closely the developments in Armenia. As I have already said, our two countries share a long-standing tradition of friendship, have large-scale cooperation in many areas as well as an allied relationship.

It is our sincere hope that the situation remains entirely within the limits of the law and the constitution, and all the political forces act responsibly and show readiness to engage in a constructive dialogue. Russia strongly believes that it would be in the vital interests of brotherly Armenia and its people to ensure that the situation in the country returns back to normal and social accord is restored as quickly as possible.

Taking into consideration that in today’s information space people can learn and see how the world lives, what happened over the past few years in various countries, we must act on this knowledge. We must draw conclusions from what is happening around the world and where it is leading.

Question: Does Russia believe that the situation will stabilise and the two sides in the conflict will resume negotiations?

Maria Zakharova: We sincerely hope so, and believe that this would be the right way to go.

Question: Nikol Pashinyan, the leader of the “velvet revolution” in Armenia, recently met with Russian Ambassador to Armenia Ivan Volynkin. Mr Pashinyan said after the meeting that the protests in the country are not directed against any other nation, including Russia. At the same time US Ambassador Richard Mills met with Acting Prime Minister Karen Karapetyan where the US diplomat in fact repeated Mr Karapetyan’s words that the Armenian prime minister may not be elected in the streets, as constitutional mechanisms must be used. Can we say that at present the great powers’ preferences are taking shape with regard to Armenia? In particular, does Richard Mills’ statement suggest that they are placing their bets not on the opposition and the demonstrators, but on the current authorities?

Maria Zakharova: Asking who the great powers are betting on is insulting to Yerevan, Armenia and its people.

This is a people with a very ancient history, with a culture and state dating back many centuries. I think we have stated unambiguously that the people of Armenia should overcome this political and social crisis themselves. Such situations regularly occur in different countries. The question is whether the people, and also those they have empowered to represent them, show wisdom and peacefully resolve the crisis without bloodshed, or turn it into a lengthy process with an unpredictable result.

We believe this is an internal matter for Armenia, and in accordance with all laws – international law, the laws of life and logic – Armenia should reach a consensus and public accord as to who is going to govern the country and how, which course to choose. We reiterate that it should be based on the laws of the country.

Contacts are ongoing. This is absolutely normal, it is international practice. We do not see anything improper in it. As I said today, contacts are being held at the level of embassies and ministers. It is, of course, the responsibility of the people of Armenia, those who created the country, its culture and history, to find the strength to achieve a wise political settlement of this situation on the basis of the law and the constitution.

Question: Several important meetings have been held recently, including between Director of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service Sergey Naryshkin and President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev [in Baku] and between Ilham Aliyev and President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Turkey. Is this situation precarious? Could it spin out of control? I am referring to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Maria Zakharova: We don’t think the situation will deteriorate.

We have put forth our position on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict many times. It must be settled through peaceful political talks and agreements. No complications, including those you mentioned, should be allowed, because this would only worsen the situation. Peaceful negotiations are the only solution to this problem.

Question: Has Moscow formulated its position on the developments in Armenia, which resulted in the resignation of Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan? The Foreign Ministry and the Kremlin only express the hope that the situation will be settled under the law. But what does Moscow think about the resignation of the prime minister because of large-scale opposition protests?

Maria Zakharova: I believe we have said absolutely clearly that all this is Armenia’s internal affair. You may have overlooked this statement.

Question: Does this mean that the actions [that resulted in the prime minister’s resignation] were legitimate?

Maria Zakharova: This issue concerns the social development of a sovereign state. This issue should not be discussed officially, but by political analysts and historians who follow these issues and who can assess the trends and the reasons behind them. This is the internal affair of Armenia. I said this today, and I can say it again. Of course, we are urging all sides to show wisdom and to take a responsible attitude to settle this problem based on the constitution.

Question: You say this is the internal affair of Armenia? They just held elections as a result of which…

Maria Zakharova: It would be fair and logical to ask the Armenian government about its views on the issue. As for us, we witnessed a situation where Yerevan announced the resignation of its prime minister. This problem must be settled in accordance with the constitution. This is an extremely clear position that does not leave room for misinterpretation. It is an absolutely clear-cut position.

Question: As reported by Interfax today, in addition to Foreign Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandian, Acting First Deputy Prime Minister Armen Gevorgyan came to Moscow as well. You said that Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov had a meeting with the Foreign Minister of Armenia. Was Armen Gevorgyan present during the meeting? If not, whom did he meet with?

Maria Zakharova: I have no detailed information about this meeting. I only have the information that I already shared with you. Surprisingly, this meeting led to conclusions which are nothing short of a conspiracy theory. It’s very strange. We never hide anything in terms of contacts. But I do not have any details. I can make inquiries and answer you later.

Question: It’s just that a source in Interfax said that the internal political situation in Armenia will also be discussed at the meeting in addition to bilateral relations.

Maria Zakharova: Again, I commented on this in the first part. I don’t believe we have ever let you down in this sense. I can clarify who was present at the meeting.

Question: Is there any limit to the number of diplomatic personnel in each particular country? For example, today you demonstrated the raider attack by the United States with regard to Russian property. The diplomatic mission in Armenia is one of the largest with over 1,500 diplomats. Are there any limits to that number?

Maria Zakharova: This is a matter of bilateral agreements. Each country agrees with another country about the number of diplomats to be sent to that country. It’s a matter of mutual agreement. If there are complications in relations similar to the ones we now have with the United States, there is a form of parity, where one country, seeing unfriendly steps and lack of respect and in order to somehow let the other country know that such an approach is inappropriate, offers parity, so that no one has any advantages. This was the case with us and the United States. They had a clear prevalence in the number of diplomats. They had several times more employees than other embassies. No other country has as many embassy employees as they do. In particular, in the wake of these expulsions and rude behaviour with regard to Russian property, diplomatic sites and diplomats, parity was proposed and the numbers are now even. This is also a conventional arrangement, because we have a Permanent Mission to the United Nations which, by virtue of history, functions on the territory of the United States. It has its own symbolism. Traditionally, the countries agree on the number of diplomats on a bilateral basis. Actually, opening consulates general and the format of an embassy are also the subject of mutual agreements based on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 and on the 1963 one on consular relations. This is the legal basis, while the details are agreed by the parties.

Project: Bridges: Fostering Turkish-Armenian Tourism Cooperation

TendersInfo – Project Notices
Monday
Bridges: Fostering Turkish-Armenian Tourism Cooperation
 
 
The objective of the Bridges Project is to promote tourism cooperation in Armenia and Turkey. The activity will identify high potential tourism products and experiences in the cross border region (East Anatolia and Armenia), establish a Network of Armenian and Turkish Tour Operators that will create cross-border tourism packages, and promote the region as a tourism destination through online marketing, discovery tours for international travel writers and photojournalists, and through cross-border events created by the network of tour operators.The activity, in partnership with EkP, a Turkish economic “think-tank” will create a new tourism corridor focused on the Turkey-Armenia cross-border region. The activity encompasses the trail between Istanbul and Meghri, and focuses on the cross-border regions of Armenia and Turkey. This activity will be aligned and linked up with the USAID-funded Black Sea Silk Road Corridor (BSSRC), including through the use of common marketing platforms.
 
 
Project completion date : 2022-12-31 12:00:00
Major organization : U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
 
Address : 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW Washington,
DC 20523
 
Country :United States
Url :
 
Financier : UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (USAID),

Azerbaijani Press: Russia Fears Losing Its Position in Armenia

Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijani Opposition Media
Monday
Russia Fears Losing Its Position in Armenia
 
 
Baku / 30.04.18 / Turan: Over the past weekend, emissaries from Moscow have visited Yerevan, trying to understand the events taking place there, and they openly expressed their concern over the possibility of Armenia’s “withdrawal” to the West.
 
At the same time, members of the Armenian government visited Moscow, where they held talks at the Foreign Ministry and other offices.
 
Realizing that they cannot keep Serzh Sargsyan’s team in power, the Kremlin realized the danger of changing the political regime, that is, the possible loss of the power by the Republican Party.
 
A Russian MP and the former Prime Minister of the former USSR Nikolai Ryzhkov, visiting Yerevan, even called the leader of the protests, Nikol Pashinyan, a “fool” and shamed Armenians for giving him such an opportunity.
 
Another Russian MP, Konstantin Zatulin, put it more clearly: if the new Armenian authorities renounce agreements with Russia, Moscow will move from de jure to de facto relations. Zatulin made it clear that Moscow will not support Armenia if it changes its pro-Russian orientation.
 
Finally, the Russian television channels controlled by the Kremlin stated very clearly that Armenia should continue to keep the Russian military base free of charge in Gyumri and remain in the CSTO and the Customs Union. This is exactly what the ruling Republican Party of Armenia, which is now being overthrown by thousands of protesters, guaranteed to Moscow.
 
It seems the breakthrough is already coming and two factions of the parliament – Dashnaktsutyun and the Tsarukyan bloc – have expressed their support for Nikol Pashinyan.
 
Elections of the Prime Minister will be held on May 1. The Republican Party has 58 MP seats, the Tsarukyan bloc has 31, the supporters of Pashinyan from the Elk bloc have 9, and Dashnaktsutyun has 7.
 
The Premier will be elected by a simple majority of votes of 105 MPs. Now 47 MPs are ready to vote for Pashinyan, but he needs at least 53. But the Republicans, who refused to nominate their candidate, do not intend to support Pashinyan.
 
If the Prime Minister is not elected, then the parliament will have to be dissolved. However, then the provisional government of the Republican Party will be able to conduct new elections, according to the constitution. For this very reason, the protesters demand a complete change of power, so that the Republican Party surrenders all positions, recognizing its defeat.
 
Apparently, the supporters of Serzh Sargsyan will not be able to retain power, and they will yield to the protesters, in exchange for security guarantees.
 
Against this background, the main intrigue remains the foreign policy issues of the future new government of Armenia and, above all, its relations with Azerbaijan and Turkey.
 
Pashinyan in every possible way avoids the issue of the Karabakh settlement. He has not previously had a special program on this issue, which will play a key role not only in the fate of his government, but also in Armenia.
 
Meanwhile Pashinyan has confined himself to statements that he does not plan any geopolitical changes. However, he will not succeed in avoiding this topic, and in the near future this issue will have vital importance for the Pashinyan team. -02D-

Pashinyan calls Armenia-Russia relations strategic, seeks broader ties with EU

Interfax – Russia & CIS General Newswire
Monday 3:43 PM MSK
Pashinyan calls Armenia-Russia relations strategic, seeks broader ties with EU
 
YEREVAN. April 30
 
Moscow and Yerevan have allied relations, Armenian protest movement leader and Elk parliamentary faction head Nikol Pashinyan said.
 
“Armenian-Russian relations are indeed strategic and allied. This is the reality that we take into consideration,” Pashinyan said at a meeting with members of the parliamentary faction of Armenia’s ruling Republican Party.
 
“As far as the CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization] is concerned, it would be useful to specify allied relations and relations of partnership within the framework of this organization. Mutual obligations should be documented in order to precisely formulate expectations as well. We will not raise the possibility of quitting the CSTO,” he said.
 
Pashinyan also reiterated the need to further promote Armenia’s relations with the European Union.
 
“We ought to develop relations with the EU, but not to the detriment of relations with other countries. It is wrong to describe our movement as pro-American or pro-Russian. Our movement is pro-Armenian,” he said.
 
Russian weapons sales to Azerbaijan will stay on the agenda of Armenia’s new government, Pashinyan said later.
 
“As you know, we have already met with Russian colleagues. The topic of Russian arms sales to Azerbaijan was discussed as well. We will continue to discuss this issue and keep this increasingly important problem in our spotlight,” he said.

In search of a community lost in time

The Daily Star, Bangladesh
 
 
In search of a community lost in time
 
Armen Arslanian, warden of the Armenian Church of the Holy Resurrection in Armanitola, talks to The Daily Star about the importance of preserving and researching the history of the Armenian community in Dhaka and how it was linked to a broader global community
 
  
 
by Moyukh Mahtab
 
“Whenever forty or more of the Armenian Nation shall become Inhabitants in any of the Garrisons, Cities or Towns belonging to the Company in the East Indies, the said Armenians shall not only have and enjoy the free use and exercise of their Religion, but there shall also be allotted to them a parcel of Ground to erect a Church thereon …”
 
– From 1688 agreement between English East India Company and Armenian merchants
 
When we speak of the Armenian Church of the Holy Resurrection in Armanitola in Old Dhaka, it is almost always of the once prominent role the Armenian community here—their businesses, their zamindaris, and the impact they had on the development of the city. Yet, what is often overlooked, and what is now understood much better due to recent scholarship by historian Sebouh David Aslanian, is that the Armenians in Dhaka were part of a truly global network. They had bases in Surat, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Chinsura, Calcutta and Dhaka to as far as Canton, Jakarta, Lhasa and Singapore. But this too was only part of the expansive network of settlements, connected to the central node of New Julfa in Isfahan in Safavid Iran. These merchants, trading all sorts of goods including textile, had settlements in St Petersburg, Moscow, Astrakhan, Istanbul, Venice, Livorno, Paris and Amsterdam, to name only a few.
 
Armen Arslanian, warden of the Armenian Church of the Holy Resurrection
 
Armen Arslanian, the current warden of the Armenian Church in Dhaka, feels this history of Armenian migration has been largely forgotten among even Armenians today. The more recent history of the Armenian Genocide in 1915 which resulted in large-scale migration of Armenians to different parts of the world overshadows the history of the Armenian merchant community. And yet, he himself inhabits a world shaped by both histories.
 
Armen was born and raised in Argentina. His parents emigrated there from Cilicia, now under Turkey, after the Armenian Genocide. Their initial plan was to eventually return. After five years in a refugee camp in Greece, when they saw there was no progress, they decided to go to Argentina. “They went with nothing, but Argentina was a very generous country—it still is. It gave them the opportunity to start over and be what they are today—the Armenians are a thriving community there still today,” says the 58-year-old.
 
Photo: Moyukh Mahtab
 
Today, as the warden of a church built by Armenian merchants in 1781, Armen is trying to preserve the rich heritage and history of their presence in the Indian subcontinent—which could possibly date back as far as the 16th century—and how it was connected to the regional and the global. As he explains: “The Armenians in this side of the world, in India, Bangladesh or Burma who came here in the 16th, 17th, 18th century were not refugees. They were following the routes of business.”
 
The 1688 agreement between the English East India Company and Armenian merchants encouraged Armenians to alter the course of their trade to and from Europe. The agreement promised special privileges to the merchants, including low customs fares. It also promised religious freedom to the Armenians, most of whom belonged to the Armenian Apostolic Church. Along with the founding of New Julfa in Isfahan in Iran in 1605 due to the deportation of Armenians from Old Julfa in Armenia by Safavid ruler Shah Abbas, this is considered today as one of the principal reasons which accelerated migration and settlement of Julfan Armenian merchants to India in the seventeenth century.
 
“They came as a community, they embraced the country and the cultures—they got along with the Mughals, the British and then with the local authorities afterwards. After the partition, their business was not favourable anymore. Because of that a lot of them went looking for better horizons. I am no historian, but as far as I know, a lot of them went to Australia and Canada after the ’70s,” says Armen.
 
***
 
The story of how Armen, from another part of the world, came to be in-charge of a church in Dhaka is just as intriguing.
 
As he narrates it: “Wherever Armenians went, they developed themselves as businessmen—that’s how they came here. That is the case even today; I am a living example of that. I came to Bangladesh in 2008 as we were opening a business here. Even three weeks before my first visit, I had no idea about the existence of this church. My daughter who was going to an Armenian school in LA, when she learnt I was coming here, told me there was an Armenian church in Bangladesh.” Armen initially thought his daughter was referring to a church in India. “So the first thing I asked my business partner when I came to Dhaka was if he had heard about the Armenian Church. That’s how we ended up coming here and meeting Mr Martin.”
 
Armenian Church of the Holy Resurrection in Armanitola, Old Dhaka. COURTESY: BANGLADESH ARMENIAN CHURCH FACEBOOK PAGE
 
Mikel Housep Martirossian (anglicised Micheal Joseph Martin), had been probably the last Armenian living in Bangladesh at the time—even in 1871, there were around 100 Armenians living in the city.
 
Armen says: “I was in a state of awe when I came through that door, it was really amazing. From then on, every time I came to Dhaka, I came to the church and met Mr Martin and got to know each other very well.” Out of respect, Armen always insisted that if Mr Martin needed anything, he should contact him.
 
Martin had a stroke in 2014. His daughters, who had already emigrated to Canada, decided that there was no way he could continue to live alone and take care of the church. And thus, at the insistence of Martin, the wardenship of the church went to Armen, since he was the only Armenian Martin knew who had frequent connections with the city. Armen still reveres Martin, now living in Canada, as his mentor: “For a long time he was the only Armenian in Dhaka and he stood his ground and kept this place for the future generations.”
 
***
 
Photo: Moyukh Mahtab
 
The Armenian Church in Armanitola today stands in almost the exact conditions as it was built. Before 1781, the grounds of the church were a graveyard. The church once even had a clock tower which was destroyed in an earthquake in 1897. The massive bell from the church’s belfry was also stolen over time, and has now been replaced with four smaller ones.
 
Today, we know that churches were significant for Julfan traders as a means of fostering a sense of common identity worldwide. The church in Dhaka, along with Armenian churches in Chinsura and Saidabad in India, used to be under the jurisdiction of the regional node, the Church of Holy Nazareth in Calcutta. These regional nodes were in turn under the jurisdiction of the Armenian church in New Julfa, and this network was one of the means of communication between the trade community scattered throughout the world.
 
So, Armen feels that although the church has a religious value, it also has a historical value which should be preserved. “Mr Martin did a wonderful job of preserving the church and keeping it intact. We changed the electricity lines and restored the two paintings that you now see.”
 
And indeed, one is struck by the beauty of the paintings as soon as they enter the church. Possibly the work of English painter Charles Pote, who was also a headmaster of the Pogose School in Old Dhaka, these paintings were in tatters. “So from the Armenian Church, they sent two diplomat restorers who had studied in Italy. Gevorg Endza Babakhanyam and Rev Fr Sevak Saribekyan, came over here and did the restoration—they did an amazing job. I had initially thought one of the paintings was beyond repair.”
 
***
 
One of the two paintings at the church alter before restoration. Courtesy: Gevorg Endza Babakhanyan
 
Armen has big plans for the church. His idea is to promote the place as a site of historical value and cultural exchange. To that end, he also wants to promote research work on the Armenian community in Bangladesh. But over the years, many church documents, which would be of immense historical value, have disappeared. Armen, after he took over, could find only some registers of births, deaths or marriages. “But when it comes to older documents or pictures, there were not many left.”
 
He continues, “We want to conduct research through professionals about the community in the Bengal area, to find out how the Armenians here were linked to the Armenians in Kolkata and from Kolkata to Julfa.”
 
“I have a lot of expectations about the research. We constantly receive questions about the community—what had happened to them. There is little information available and whatever exists is not compiled. So one of our projects is to conduct a research study and make a professional compilation of the history of the Armenian community in Bangladesh, from the beginning until today.”
 
For preservation purposes, Armen also got in touch with the Armenian ambassador to Bangladesh, the Ministry of Cultural Affairs in Bangladesh and Unesco for designating the church as a Unesco world heritage site. “The process is complicated. But, this initiative has the support of the board of the church, the Armenian Church in Armenia, and Mr Asaduzzaman Noor has expressed support too. The process has to be started here from the local government, and he has said he is interested in promoting it.”
 
The two restored paintings at the altar of the church, The Last Supper and the Crucifixion, most probably the work of Charles Pote, were in a dismal state when Armen took over wardenship. Photo: Moyukh Mahtab
 
Now, he is getting mail from some Armenians about how they had visited the church, or telling him how one of their forefathers lies buried here. But Armen feels that Armenians still don’t know much about their historical presence in this part of the world. He says: “The Armenian diaspora probably amounts to seven million people living outside Armenia, mostly in western countries. Among most of them there is very little knowledge about the Armenians who came to the Indian subcontinent. I remember that when we were kids, we knew that there were some Armenians in India and this and that but it was very vague information. The lack of awareness is something I am personally working on. I always send out and share articles published on Armenia. Now we are receiving emails expressing surprise, asking questions.”
 
Armen’s interest goes beyond just the church. He says, “We keep hearing of other Armenian settlements here even beyond Dhaka. I was told about the Pogose School, one of the first private schools in Dhaka which was built by the Armenian Zamindar Nicholas Pogose. I went to the school, and the state of the place is pitiful. So maybe we can bring some relief to the school—maybe some funding from Armenians. We think it is our duty to do something since it is part of our heritage.”
 
As the warden of the church, Armen visits Bangladesh every one and a half months or so. “I wish I had more time to work here. We would love to see if somehow the City Corporation can help us with the entrance. We want the outside to be a bit more accessible. We can do a lot more. If we can make the cultural centre, I think it would be a great contribution, as long as the Bangladeshi community embraces the place.”
 
Armen Arslanian’s work on the church has not only meant better preserved premises, but the church is also drawing more visitors. But, he is also trying to make the church a more integral part of the community in Bangladesh. The church arranges to feed 300-400 local underprivileged people twice every month now, and also arranges free medical camps for locals.
 
“My goal is to preserve the history and the future of the church in hope that its legacy is one that will be remembered for generations to come,” says Armen.
 
________________________________
 
The Armenian Church would love to hear from anyone with an association to the Armenian families who once lived in this part of the world for their forthcoming research project. To get in touch, email
 
________________________________

Armenian Canadians join Velvet Revolution in their homeland

Radio Canada International
May 1 2018


Many Canadian Armenians are watching with baited breath as a non-violent
grassroots protest movement in Armenia is about to complete the transfer of
power from the governing party to the leader of the opposition whose
unprecedented campaign of civil disobedience forced the resignation of the
country’s prime minister and former president.

Armenia’s parliament is scheduled to vote for a new prime minister on
Tuesday, eight days after former Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan, who ruled
Armenia for 10 years, stepped down following 11 days of mass and largely
peaceful protests against his continued rule in the former Soviet republic.

Sargsyan, who had already served two terms as the country’s president,
changed the constitution in 2015 to turn Armenia from a presidential republic
where the executive power was held by the president, into a parliamentary
republic where the executive power is held by the prime minister and the
president plays a largely ceremonial role.

Sargsyan was forced to resign after tens of thousands of people flooded the
streets in the capital of Yerevan and other cities and towns to protest his
political maneuvering to cling to power despite repeated promises not to run for
the position of the prime minister.

Nikol Pashinyan, the leader of the opposition Yelq (Exit) movement who has
accused Sargsyan and his ruling Republican Party of mass election fraud and vote
buying, is demanding that the Republican-controlled parliament elect him as
interim prime minister so he can organize free and fair elections in
Armenia.

Protests in support of Pashinyan have been held all across Armenia and
Armenian Diaspora communities scattered around the world, including a protest on
Sunday in front of the Armenian embassy in Canada.

Vadz Ghazaryan, an IT professional who immigrated to Canada from Armenia in
2014, said the protests have transformed the political landscape in his
homeland, giving people hope that the corrupt political system led by the
Republican Party can finally be reformed.

(click to listen to the interview with Vadz Ghazaryan)