Mnatsakanyan: New Armenian government committed to continue close partnership with EU

Arminfo, Armenia
Mnatsakanyan: New Armenian government committed to continue close partnership with EU

Yerevan May 30

Mariana Mkrtchyan. Armenian Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanyan congratulated everyone on the Day of Europe.

“The symbol of the day – peace and unity, best characterizes modern Europe.” In fact, the lessons learned by Europe, which went through the test of two destructive wars, can become a guidebook for all mankind. If only with respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, on the basis of democracy and the rest of universal values, a stable and developing society is being built, a real citizen is being formed, since historical times Armenia has been a part of European civilization and has tried to make its modest contribution to its development. Today Armenia continues to expand relations with the EU and its Member States to strengthen its position in the European structures, in particular the Council of Europe, contributing to the work of the OSCE”, the head of the Armenian Foreign Ministry said.

According to him, since last year’s celebrations of the Days of Europe in Armenia, significant progress has been made in the relations between Yerevan and Brussels. He recalled that in November of last year an agreement on an expanded and comprehensive Armenia-EU partnership was signed, and already in April of this year the Armenian parliament ratified this document. “This is not just a legal document regulating Armenia-EU relations, but a reflection of the interaction based on a common system of values.” Moreover, in February this year, a decision was signed to approve a document on Armenia-EU partnership priorities, which, together with the agreement, is the main guidebook I can say with confidence that the new agreement is a project of specific development, with its clear goals and road map, the successful implementation of which will have a profound impact Practical all spheres of public life”, stated the Armenian minister.

At the same time, he stressed that the interest in the events in the framework of the Days of Europe is obvious both in Yerevan and in the regions of the country. Mnatsakanyan said that he would like these interests and approaches to spread to the whole range of Armenia-EU relations, the entire bilateral agenda and its successful implementation. According to him, the new government of Armenia is committed to continue close partnership with the EU, remaining true to the agenda, joint vector and commitment to regional stability, strengthening peace and stable development.

‘Javakheti is a bridge in Armenian-Georgian relations’ – expert on PM Pashinyan’s visit

ArmenPress, Armenia
‘Javakheti is a bridge in Armenian-Georgian relations’ – expert on PM Pashinyan’s visit



YEREVAN, MAY 30, ARMENPRESS. The agenda of Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan’s visit to Georgia is rather busy, with important emphases, expert Joni Melikyan told ARMENPRESS.

Melikyan noted the rather expanded delegation of the PM, suggesting a comprehensive and effective visit.

“This visit also bears a courtesy nature, but in addition to getting to know each other issues of bilateral interest will be raised during a number of planned meetings,” he said, adding that a new phase of development in the Armenian-Georgian ties can be expected after this visit.

The Armenian PM is also expected to visit Javakheti.

Only two official visits from Armenia were made to Javakheti in the last 15 years – one by Serzh Sargsyan who was serving as defense minister at the time, and the other by PM Andranik Margaryan.

“The visit to Javakheti is very important. Firstly it is agreed with Tbilisi, which is a bilateral message – both to certain external powers and certain internal political circles. The message is the following: Javakheti is not a disconnecting, but a connecting area in the Armenian-Georgian relations. It is a bridge in the Armenian-Georgian ties,” Melikyan said.

The one-on-one meeting of Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan and Georgian PM Giorgi Kvirikashvili has kicked off in the governmental seat of Georgia in Tbilisi.

The Armenian PM was welcomed outside the governmental seat in Tbilisi in an official welcoming ceremony.

The one-on-one meeting will be followed by an expanded format meetings of delegations.

The Prime Ministers will deliver a joint press conference afterwards.

Later the Armenian PM will have meetings with Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili, Speaker of Parliament Irakli Kobakhidze, and President Giorgi Margvelashvili.

The Prime Minister will lay flowers at the tombs of Hovhannes Tumanyan, Raffi and Gabriel Sundukyan and Sayat Nova in the Khojivank pantheon.

As part of the two-day visit, PM Pashinyan will also visit Javakheti and meet with the Armenian community.

The delegation of the Armenian PM includes his deputy Tigran Avinyan, defense minister Davit Tonoyan, foreign minister Zohrab Mnatsakanyan, education and science minister Arayik Harutyunyan, culture minister Lilit Makunts, minister of diaspora Mkhitar Hayrapetyan, minister of transportation, communication and IT Ashot Hakobyan and other government officials.

The Armenian PM arrived in Georgia on May 30.

English –translator/editor:Stepan Kocharyan

9th Pan-Armenian Forum of Journalists kicks off in Yerevan

ArmenPress, Armenia
9th Pan-Armenian Forum of Journalists kicks off in Yerevan


YEREVAN, MAY 30, ARMENPRESS. Reporters and journalists from Armenia, Artsakh and the Diaspora from over 70 countries are taking part in the 9th Pan-Armenian Forum. The forum kicked off today in the Diaspora ministry HQ in Yerevan.

The forum will focus on the media coverage of the latest events in Armenia, the role of reporters in the events and journalism and press of the First Armenian Republic. Armenia celebrated the centennial Republic Day on May 28 – the 100th anniversary of establishment of the First Armenian Republic.

ARMENPRESS Editor-In-Chief Mrs. Narine Nazaryan is also participating in the forum.

English –translator/editor:Stepan Kocharyan

Music: Istanbul-based Armenian band “Vomank” to perform concerts in Armenia

Panorama, Armenia
Culture 10:49 31/05/2018 Armenia

An alternative Armenian band “Vomank” is set to perform five concerts Armenia – three in Yerevan and two in Gyumri and Vanadzor.  Ermenihaber reports, that the concerts are organized with the support of Armenia’s ministry of Diaspora, “Dayl’Ayl Production” and producer Sevan Ataoglu.

It gains inspiration from traditional Armenian music but takes a more alternative approach to its interpretation.

Vomank has been performing throughout Istanbul and abroad and has a wide music repertoire, which includes well known traditional songs of Anatolia that are sung with similar melodies but in different languages by people that were or are living there. Vomank has its own compositions in Turkish and Armenian and also has works inspired from important figures of Armenian literature.

Vomank released its first album ‘Demo’ in 2015. Their second album ‘PanAlik’ was released in 2017, in which some songs are featured with Arto Tuncboyaciyan.

Vomank’s aim is to narrate the present story of Anatolia and other lands in which Armenian culture used to and still exists, and to meld the past and the dream of the future together.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 05/31/2018

                                        Thursday, 
Armenian Mayor Arrested Over Attack On Protesters
Armenia - Davit Hambardzumian, the mayor of Masis.
The mayor of an Armenian town affiliated with the former ruling Republican 
Party (HHK) and four other men have been arrested on suspicion of assaulting 
protesters in Yerevan last month.
The incident took place in the city’s southern Erebuni district just hours 
after Nikol Pashinian, the main organizer of mass protests against HHK leader 
Serzh Sarkisian’s continued rule, was detained on April 22. Hundreds of 
Pashinian supporters demonstrating there were attacked by several dozen men 
wearing medical masks and wielding sticks and even electric shock guns. They 
threw stones at the crowd and beat up some of the protesters.
Law-enforcement authorities launched a criminal investigation into the attack 
after Sarkisian resigned as prime minister on April 23. Pashinian demanded such 
a probe immediately after being elected as the country’s new premier on May 8.
Armenia’s Investigative Committee said on Thursday that it has arrested five 
persons on suspicion of participating in the “mass disturbances” in Erebuni. It 
said they include Davit Hambardzumian, the mayor of Masis, a small town about 
10 kilometers south of Yerevan, his deputy Karen Ohanian and three other Masis 
residents.
Armenia - A screenshot of a video of thugs beating up an opposition protester 
in Yerevan's Erebuni district on 22 April 2018.
The law-enforcement body said its investigators have looked into online videos 
of the violence and other media reports about it. “The investigation is 
continuing,” it said in a statement. “Measures are being taken to ensure a 
comprehensive, full and objective examination of all circumstances of the 
incident.”
A screenshot of one such video publicized by the “Haykakan Zhamanak” daily 
purportedly shows that Hambardzumian was among the masked thugs who attacked 
the protesters in Erebuni.
It was not immediately clear whether the Masis mayor and the other detained men 
admit their involvement in the attack.
Hambardzumian, 32, is an HHK member who was elected mayor in 2016 with the help 
of the then ruling party. He is reportedly related to Arshak Hakobian, the 
chief bodyguard of Vladimir Gasparian, the former chief of the Armenian police 
sacked by Pashinian earlier this month.
Law-enforcement authorities have also made at least three other arrests in 
connection with similar incidents that occurred in two other parts of Yerevan 
during the Pashinian-led protest movement. Some Armenian media outlets have 
accused Yerevan Mayor Taron Markarian and Mihran Poghosian, a controversial 
parliamentarian, of orchestrating those attacks on protesters. Both men 
affiliated with the HHK deny that.
Greater U.S. Assistance To Armenia Under Discussion
        • Sargis Harutyunyan
Armenia - US Ambassador to Armenia Richard Mills speaks in Yerevan, .
The U.S. government is discussing with the new authorities in Yerevan the 
possibility of providing more economic assistance to Armenia under a special 
program designed to foster reforms in developing nations, U.S. Ambassador 
Richard Mills said on Thursday.
“We are very pleased to be fully engaged with the new government and have an 
opportunity to talk about how the U.S. government can help the new government,” 
Mills told reporters.
Armenia qualified for the Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) program shortly 
after Washington launched it in 2006, receiving $177 million for the 
rehabilitation of rural irrigation networks.
The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), a U.S. government agency running 
the aid scheme, also planned to allocate $60 million for the reconstruction of 
the country’s rural roads. But it scrapped that allocation shortly after a 
disputed 2008 presidential election that was followed by a harsh government 
crackdown on the Armenian opposition.
The administration of former President Serzh Sarkisian tried unsuccessfully to 
restore Yerevan’s eligibility for the multimillion-dollar scheme in the 
following years. U.S. officials said, among other things, that it is not doing 
enough to combat widespread corruption.
Armenia - Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisian (L) and Patrick Fine, vice-president 
of the U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation, visit a newly constructed pumping 
station in Ararat province, 03Oct2011.
The United States signaled its readiness to boost economic aid to Armenia 
following the recent democratic revolution there. Visiting Yerevan earlier this 
week, a U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state, Bridget Brink, offered U.S. 
assistance to the new Armenian government’s ambitious anti-corruption agenda.
Mills said Brink discussed with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and other senior 
Armenian officials “possible options” for increasing U.S. aid. Those include 
renewed MCA funding, he said.
“We will continue those discussions,” added the U.S. ambassador.
Immediately after Pashinian took office on May 8, the Armenian National 
Committee of America (ANCA), an influential lobbying group, renewed its calls 
for $140 million in fresh MCA funding to Armenia. In a letter to U.S. Secretary 
of State Mike Pompeo, the ANCA chairman, Raffi Hamparian, said that would help 
to cement the country’s “democratic development.”
Pompeo replied to Hamparian on May 17, saying that he shares the ANCA’s 
“enthusiasm about the peaceful, constitutional political transition that 
transpired in Armenia.” “We hope to see the Armenian government make progress 
on MCC’s eligibility criteria (‘scorecard’) this year so that the MCC Board of 
Directors may consider Armenia for a compact during the annual selection 
process,” he wrote.
The ANCA wants the MCC to mostly spend the proposed sum on improving science, 
technology, engineering and math education in Armenia’s underfunded public 
schools. It says that would ultimately benefit the country’s burgeoning 
information technology (IT) industry.
Energy Firm Hits Back At Armenian Government
        • Hovannes Movsisian
Armenia - An electricity transmission tower.
A company belonging to Russian-Armenian billionaire Samvel Karapetian said on 
Thursday it itself has pulled out of an agreement with the Armenian government 
to manage the country’s electricity transmission network.
The Russian-based company, Tashir Kapital, denied the recently appointed Energy 
Minister Artur Grigorian's claim that the new government has decided to 
terminate the management contract because some of its provisions are “not 
beneficial for the state.”
“During the process of termination of the agreement between the Armenian 
government and Tashir Kapital no provisions were discussed and there were no 
negotiations on any [specific] issue, especially with the participation of the 
newly appointed [energy] minister,” read a company statement.
The previous government moved last year to authorize Tashir Kapital to manage 
the High-Voltage Electric Networks (HVEN) for the next 25 years. Government 
officials said at the time that the new operator will cut costs by 
“synchronizing” Armenia’s power transmission and distribution networks. They 
said Tashir Kapital will also obtain large-scale loans that will be used for 
refurbishing electricity transmission lines and substations and building new 
facilities.
Grigorian did not specify the reasons for the government’s decision to scrap 
the deal when he spoke to journalists on Wednesday. For its part, Tashir 
Kapital gave no reasons for its purported decision not to run HVEN.
Instead, Tashir Kapital listed a raft of data meant to show that HVEN has been 
badly mismanaged and is a heavy burden on state finances. In particular, ts 
statement pointed to $520 million in outstanding debts incurred by the 
state-owned network in the last 15 years.
The statement said that Tashir Kapital would slash HVEN’s “inflated” 
operational costs by 40 percent if the deal did not fall through. The company 
also claimed that the cost of a planned new power transmission line connecting 
Armenia to Georgia, estimated by the government at $200 million, is 
disproportionately high. It said it could have built the line with only $70 
million in investments.
“HVEN cannot be of interest to Tashir Kapital as a source of profit,” added the 
statement. “The main motive for the negotiations was to ease [HVEN’s] impact on 
the [electricity] tariffs.”
Tashir purchased the Electric Networks of Armenia (ENA), the debt-ridden 
national power utility, and a large power plant in the Armenian town of Hrazdan 
from a state-run Russian energy company in 2015. The new owner appears to have 
significantly cut ENA’s massive losses since then.
Samvel Karapetian strongly supported former Prime Minister Karen Karapetian (no 
relation) throughout the latter’s tenure which came to an end when former 
President Serzh Sarkisian became prime minister on April 17. Karen Karapetian 
took over as acting prime minister after Sarkisian stepped down on April 23 
amid mass protests against his continued rule.
Pashinian Ends Visit To Georgia
        • Karlen Aslanian
Georgia - Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian is greeted by people outside 
an Armenian church in Tbilisi, .
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian sounded optimistic about the future of 
Georgian-Armenian relations on Thursday as he toured Armenian-populated areas 
of Georgia at the end of a two-day official visit to the country.
Pashinian lavished praise on his Georgian counterpart Giorgi Kvirikashvili, 
calling him a “good friend” of Armenia the day after they met for the first 
time in Tbilisi.
“I want to say that the most important result of this visit is that a warm 
personal relationship, friendship has been established between Georgian Prime 
Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili and me,” he said.
The two premiers pledged to give new impetus to bilateral ties after their 
talks. They attended later on Wednesday an official reception at the Tbilisi 
City Hall dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the establishment of Armenia’s 
first independent republic.
Speaking at the event, Kvirikashvili hailed the recent peaceful protests in 
Armenia that brought Pashinian to power. “All the signs are the changes in 
Armenia laid the firm foundation for Armenia’s further development,” he said.
Pashinian met with the influential head of the Georgian Orthodox Church, 
Patriarch Ilia II, and businesspeople in Tbilisi on Thursday morning before 
heading to Georgia’s Javakheti region mostly populated by ethnic Armenians. He 
visited several local towns and villages where scores of people gathered to 
greet him and listen to his speeches.
Georgia - Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Georgian Foreign Minister 
Mikheil Janelidze meet with residents of Akhalkalaki, .
“I believe that after this official visit a new page will be opened in 
Armenia’s relations with Georgia and Armenian-Georgian relations in general,” 
Pashinian said at a rally held in the village of Gandza. “We think that 
Armenian-Georgian relations must be based on the following new formula. 
Georgia’s government and people must be confident that there is no conspiracy 
and threats towards Georgia and the Georgian people in the actions of Armenia 
and the Armenian people.”
“By the same token, Armenia and the Armenian people must be confident that 
there is no conspiracy and threats towards Armenia and the Armenian people in 
the actions of the Georgian state and the Georgian people,” he added. “It is on 
this basis that we need to build a new relationship, new friendship, new 
brotherhood.”
Pashinian insisted that the current Georgian government is committed to 
tackling high unemployment and other socioeconomic problems in Javakheti that 
have long fueled discontent among local residents.
Press Review
“Zhamanak” comments on allegations by the National Security Service (NSS) that 
businessman Samvel Aleksanian’s Alex Holding group has evaded millions of 
dollars in taxes. “The NSS has revealed something which just about every active 
citizen of Armenia knows,” writes the paper. The only question, it says, is 
that how much Aleksanian and other influential tycoons paid the country’s 
previous rulers for their privileged positions in business.
“After the velvet revolution the [former ruling] HHK has found itself in a pit 
whit itself had dug,” writes “Zhoghovurd.” The paper sees an “outflow” of 
deputies from the HHK’s parliamentary faction, saying that the party has no 
“legislative levers” to force defectors to resign from the parliament. It says 
that the HHK itself had previously resisted calls for obligating such defectors 
to relinquish their parliament seats. “The HHK elite now regrets not taking 
that measure,” it says. “It did not occur to HHK figures that Serzh Sarkisian 
will resign and they will lose power one day.”
“Haykakan Zhamanak” suggests that the new Armenian government will try to 
achieve a reduction in the prices of electricity and natural gas in the 
country. “Even without complex calculations, it is evident that there are 
substantial resources for cutting the tariffs,” writes the paper. “The thing is 
that the energy and gas sectors have always been murky to the public. They are 
closed systems with huge amounts of money in circulation. For many years the 
Armenian energy sector has been controlled by loyalists of the ruling clan. 
People holding high-level and mid-level positions there have made huge 
fortunes.”
“Hayots Ashkhar” sees a growing Azerbaijani military threat to Armenia 
emanating from the Nakhichevan exclave. The paper points out that in recent 
weeks Azerbaijani troops deployed there have moved their positions closer to 
Armenian army posts at some sections of the Armenia-Nakhichevan border.
(Tigran Avetisian)
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2018 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org

Armed Incident in Karbi Village; One Person Arrested, Gun Found

Category
Society

A criminal case was initiated in Aragatsotn Regional Investigative Department of the RA Investigative Committee on the armed incident that took place on May 27 in the village of Karbi. In the result of urgent measures circumstances significant for the criminal case were found out, one person was arrested.

Pursuant to initial data, on May 27, 2018 at about 22:30 at the area near municipality building in the community of Karbi of Aragatsotn region a row erupted between a group of people which turned into brawl. During the incident a firearm, cutting-piercing item were used. As a result, 4 people with bodily injuries of different gravities were taken to medical center; 2 of them – with firearm injuries, one – stabbed.

A criminal case was initiated in the RA IC Aragatsotn Regional Investigative Department according to the Part 4 of the Article 258, the Points 1, 6 of the Part 2 of the Article 34-104, the Part 1 of the Article 112 and the Part 1 of the Article 235 of RA Criminal Code. Through inspection of the scene 7 capsules, blood like traces were found.

An investigatory group was formed, an investigatory plan was worked out, working hypotheses were put forward, cameras located at the area of the neighborhood of the scene were confiscated.

In the result of investigatory and operative-searching measures of great volume a number of circumstances significant for the criminal case were found out, actual data were obtained on the identity of the person having fired shots in a way dangerous for many people’s life; he is a resident of Karbi. In the result of investigatory action conducted with his participation the gun, which was the crime tool, was found at the area of the cemetery of the village of Ohanavan and confiscated.

The suspect was arrested.

Preliminary investigation is ongoing. Measures are taken to provide the comprehensive, complete and objective investigation of circumstances of the case, to identify everyone involved in the incident and to personalize their actions.

Note; Everyone charged with alleged crime offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

ACNIS reView #19, 2018: There are rats, but there’s nowhere to run

 

Editorial

25  MAY 2018

 

An
ambiguous, unforeseen situation has arisen in Armenia: the majority of the
parliament is the opposition, and the smallest faction is the government. This
is a consequence of the RPA policy. The parliamentary majority is not
considered legitimate on the part of society, that is, the institution of
elections has been so raped that it is regarded as a prostitute, and the
government, in fact, was formed through direct public intervention.

The current
situation is not a constitutional crisis, but a discredited parliamentary
crisis due to electoral fraud, which caused such an exotic situation. As a
result, the main topic of the public discourse of today’s Armenia is a possible
solution to this situation. In particular, two possible options are considered:

A / Counter-revolution.
Most of the National Assembly, feeling that public confidence in the current
government is weakening, is restoring its positions. In other words, being
incapable of accepting the necessary bills, the government either has to
resign, or a year later the majority of the National Assembly expresses a vote
of no-confidence in the government.

B / Rat
Races
. The RPA faction is collapsing, and the parliament
becomes manageable for the executive body. A significant part of the RPA
faction, businessmen and local authorities, are under the control of the
government. To control them, the latter has at hand two effective tools –
direct dependence on the government and increased attention of law enforcement.
The RPA political group becomes a minority in the National Assembly.

Both
“counterrevolutionaries” and “revolutionaries” are in the
same trap and have one option – to meet public demand. Demand remains the same:
joint efforts to implement deep structural reforms that will not allow us to
return to the pre-revolutionary situation. The changes will guarantee that both
sides can continue to live in Armenia. And now let’s consider the probability
of two scenarios.

 

The revolution
was not realized for the sake of the Civil Contract party, but against the
system embodied by Serzh Sargsyan. The attitude of people towards the current
government can change, but in no case will it change with respect to the former
government and a return to the old order and old people will not be allowed.
This is the cornerstone of the national agreement. And in this sense, the
expectations of “counterrevolution” are false. Neither Nikol
Pashinyan nor the current government is the main obstacle to the return to the
old order. This is the mass of young people who do not want to return to Old
Armenia.

 

This
“optimistic” approach is conditioned by the precedent of the
“Yerkrapaitisation” of the “Hanrapetutiun” (Republic)
Faction of the ANM, which occurred within one day in 1998. Republicans are
concerned about the possibility of “rat race”, but they do not
understand one simple thing: the rat race will be the first blow not for
themselves, but for the current government. In 1998 there was a coup d’état,
and there were no qualitative changes either in the management system or in the
public consciousness. “Racers” were traitors to their former
teammates, and the public was indifferent to this phenomenon. In this
situation, the current government can not tolerate this “gift” in its
ranks, because the revolutionary society will not accept it. They can not be in
a new management system in any status.

Both sides are
compelled to fulfill the demand of the public – to make irreversible changes in
the country, which will not allow us to return to the old ways and relations.
Other scenarios are dangerous for both sides.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACNIS reView

Analytical

 

  

 

From the first days of the formation of the interim government of Armenia, discussions began in the country, first of all, about finding ways to fight corruption and creating conditions for holding free elections. The growing wave of information about large-scale machinations of the former authorities to the state budget caused a shock in all layers of society. Citizens simply don’t understand how to fix a public administration that has been mired in pervasive corruption schemes for decades. For now, the new government only promises to submit to the public’s court specific facts related to appropriations of budget funds and returning these funds to the budget.

However
the country’s problem is not only budget robberies. Capital and politics
complete convergence has other, no less dangerous consequences for the state.
The state budget is not only being looted, but also to be formed in the necessary volume
does not have the possibility of large-scale shadow business entities
due to economic activity. These entities act developed
within the framework of shadow mechanisms, receiving excessive profits and paying shadow taxes
at the top of the pyramid of power. The beginning and the end of those financial flows at once
almost impossible to bid on.

But
something else can be revealed. the situation described above in the country of ownership
is a consequence of lack of protection. When property is not protected, it
the only way to protect it is to usurp the levers of state power. this is the
what we witnessed in Armenia for more than two decades. And the government?
the usurpation leads to inevitable consequences: the elimination of justice and
paralysis of the mechanism of free elections. This is exactly the picture in Armenia
we see It is true that the people aborted all those shady connections that
maintained such a political regime, but it would be naïve to think that
without reforms in the financial and economic sectors, this picture can
to change.  

Question:
arises: why does property in Armenia not have protection until now?
mechanisms. The answer is simple: society does not recognize that property.
and first of all, the legality of the big one. A large property has been acquired
illegally, it was simply seized from the citizens of the country. And naturally
that citizens do not recognize its legitimacy. Large is also natural
owners to protect themselves from the demands of society through usurpation of power
the aspiration. That closes the circle. But with this property protected
does not become And here’s the problem.

Deprived of property and opportunities to form state power, the society is unwittingly ready to always support the efforts of any ruler who encroaches on other people’s property. If a large owner opposes the ruler, he puts his property at risk. That property is easily taken to the “applause” of destitute citizens. In other words, the society isolated from politics and appropriated national wealth turns into an ally of another property occupier “above”. Thus, society’s denial towards the government and big owners the attitude becomes the main condition of coups and property redistribution in the “clan-oligarchic” system.

Up
the given arguments allow to construct property insecurity
the algorithm is:

  • big
    owners usurp the power of the society and
    using property to form power to society
    in removing from mechanisms;
  • society
    sees his political opponents in the big owners, who
    he is removed from the mechanism of forming the legal government;
  • from property
    deprived society is not inclined to recognize the legitimacy of property and
    tends to support any effort to redistribute ownership.

This
the main point in the whole algorithm is that society is not inclined
to legally recognize “from above” property. This is a sufficient basis for anyone
for the permanent redistribution of property by one. Property always
becomes a target of political processes.

Basic:
the conclusion can be the following. property can get
sufficient guarantees of protection if the public stands up for itself
to property. That is, property protection guarantees can be born
in society and not in power.

But
society can defend property if in the owner
not to see him as an enemy, but as an ally for the regulation of a just way of life. Nothing else
nothing can unite the one who has nothing with the one who has. Specifically, this
requires the position of the owners in the formation of the state authority
a radical change that can protect the interests of society.

For modern owners who
have accumulated their property, relying on the government, it is still not easy to understand
this logic. Indeed, it is not easy for owners to understand that
talking to the public in the language of bribery and forming the government
rather than removing the public from the mechanisms is much more beneficial
to cooperate with the society in the formation of the elected government and
shift to the practice of sharing financial opportunities with society.

Surely the owners might one day
realize that the issue of property protection should not be confused
with relations with government, other society. Realize that
property should be removed from the field of political processes – political
passing on opportunities to society. Protection of property
in return, a “tax” should be given not to the highest authority, but to the society
turning the arrows of public denial from the self to the government.

And the logic is that if legal
in the formation of the government, the owners become the society
allies then power in the redistribution of property
becomes
 powerless, because of such intentions of the government
in this case, the society will protect the owners, seeing in them its own
source of well-being and protection of political and economic rights
question to his allies. That would be it society’s wealth and
the first joint of the unisex classes
 the beginning of interest formation:
the interest that exists in creating a system of universal legal protection
in action.

The analysis presented in this article is weak
to assert that the key problem of Armenia is the property protection program
is implementation and getting rid of politics from the dictates of capital. This is possible
is to do with the adoption of a number of laws that will regulate economic and political
the activity. Economical համաներումը՝ big owners compensation to society
payment of tax
 provided, to regulate the state
is the most effective way. Towards a state management system for businessmen
blocking the way, the parallel adoption of the Law on Parties second
is the bracket that separates the world of politics from the world of capital. Everything else
which will be regulated by the “domino principle” in the state.

 

Manvel Sargsyan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACNIS reView

 

Editorial

 

An ambiguous situation has arisen in Armenia,
unforeseen situation: the majority of parliament is the opposition, and the smallest
faction – power. This is a consequence of the RPA policy. The parliamentary majority is not
is considered legitimate by society, that is, the institution of elections is so
raped, that he is treated as a prostitute, and the government,
in fact, it was formed through direct public intervention.

The current situation is not a constitutional crisis, but
discredited parliamentary crisis due to election fraud, which
caused such an exotic situation. As a result, the main topic of public
the discourse of today’s Armenia is a possible solution to this situation. B
In particular, two possible options are being considered:

A / Counter-revolution. The majority of the National Assembly, feeling that public confidence in
the current government is weakening and regaining its position. Others
In other words, being unable to pass the necessary bills, the government
either forced to resign, or a year later the majority of the National
The meeting expresses a vote of no confidence in the government.

B/ Rat race: The RPA faction is collapsing, and the parliament
becomes manageable for the executive body. A significant part of the faction
The RPA, businessmen and local authorities, come under the control of the government.
To control them, the government has at hand two effective
instrument – direct dependence on it and increased attention
law enforcement agencies. The RPA political group becomes a minority in
National Assembly.

Both “counter-revolutionaries” and “revolutionaries” are in
one trap and have one option – to meet public demand.
The demand is still the same: to jointly implement deep state
reforms that will not allow a return to the pre-revolutionary situation. Changes
will guarantee that both parties will be able to continue to live in Armenia.
Now let’s look at
probability of two scenarios.

 

The revolution was not realized for the sake of the Civil Party
agreement,” but against the system embodied by Serzh Sargsyan. People’s attitude towards
the current government may change, but in no case will it change
in relation to the previous government and a return to the previous order and the old
persons will not be allowed. This is the cornerstone of the national agreement.
And in this sense, the expectations of “counter-revolution” are false. Neither Nikol Pashinyan nor
the current government is not the main obstacle to return
to the old order. This is a mass of young people who do not want to return to
Old Armenia.

 

This “optimistic” approach is driven by precedent
“Yerkrapaization” of the “Hanrapetutyun” faction of the ANM, which occurred within one
days in 1998. Republicans are concerned about the possibility of a “rat race”
however, they do not understand one simple thing: the rat race will not be the first blow
for themselves, but for the current government. In 1998 there was
coup d’etat, and there were no qualitative changes in either
management system, nor in the public consciousness. “Runners” were traitors to
their former teammates, and the public was indifferent to this phenomenon. B
Given the situation, the current government cannot tolerate this “gift” in its
ranks, because revolutionary society will not accept him. They can’t be in
new management system in no status.

Both sides are forced to comply with the public demand
– make irreversible changes in the country that will not allow a return to the previous
orders and relationships.
Other scenarios are dangerous for both sides.

 

 

 

 

https://acnis.am/ru/editorial/19-2018-ru

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACNIS reView

Editorial

 

MAY25 2018

 

 

 

In Armenia
An ambiguous situation, not foreseen by the Constitution, has been created: the parliament
the majority is the opposition, and the smallest faction is the government.
It is the consequence of the policy conducted by the RPA. Parliamentary majority
is not considered legitimate among the public, that is, the institution of elections
raped so much that she is treated as a prostitute,
as a result, the government was formed directly by the public
thanks to the intervention.

Created
the situation is not a constitutional crisis, but due to electoral fraud
the crisis of the discredited parliament, which brought about such an exotic existence.
As a result, the main topic of today’s public discourse in Armenia is that state 
are possible solutions. Two in particular are considered
possible option

A/ Counter-revolution. National
the majority of the assembly, feeling that public to the existing government
confidence weakens, regains its position. That is, not being able to
pass the necessary bills, the government is forced to resign
gives, or a year later the majority of the National Assembly expresses no confidence
to the government.

B/ Rat race. RPA:
the faction collapses and the parliament becomes an executive body
manageable. A significant part of the RPA faction is businessmen and regional
authorities, pass under the control of the government. To them
the latter has two powerful tools to control: directly from the government
being addicted and the close attention of law enforcement agencies. RPA:
the political team becomes a minority in the National Assembly. 

Two possible
even in the case of scenarios, the created situation is not fully understood. either
Both “counter-revolutionaries” and “revolutionaries” are in the same trap
have one option: to submit to public demand. It’s one more
implement deep state reforms with joint efforts, which are not weak
let’s go back to the pre-revolutionary situation. Changes to the warranty
will happen so that both parties can continue to live in Armenia. And?
now let’s consider the probability of both scenarios one by one.

 

The revolution
it was not implemented for the sake of the “Civil Contract” party, but against it
of the system embodied by Serzh Sargsyan. The attitude of the people
towards the current government can be changed, but not towards the previous government
under no circumstances will it change, and a return to the old order and old faces will not be tolerated.
That is the core of popular agreement. And in that sense
The expectations of “counter-revolution” are in vain. Basic back to the old ways
the obstacle is neither Nikol Pashinyan nor the current government. That
it is the mass of young people who do not want to return to Old Armenia.

 

Similar
The “optimistic” approach is due to the “Republic” of the ANM in 1998.
with the precedent of the faction’s “land reservation” that took place within one day. Republicans are concerned about the possibility of the “rat race”, but one thing is simple
they don’t understand. the rat race will primarily be a blow not to them, but to
of the current government. In 1998, there was a coup and no government
there were no qualitative changes in the system or public consciousness. The “Runners” were traitors to their former teammates, and to the public
was indifferent to that phenomenon. In today’s case, the current government
he cannot tolerate that “gift” in his ranks, because he made a revolution
the public will not accept it. Are they in any position in the new management system?
they cannot be.

Both sides
are also condemned to fulfill the public demand to implement in the country
irreversible changes, which will not allow to return to the previous order and
to the relationship. The other scenarios are dangerous for both sides.