150 ceasefire violations by Azerbaijan registered in past week

PanArmenian, Armenia

PanARMENIAN.Net – About 150 ceasefire violations – more than 1300 shots in total – by Azerbaijani army were registered on the contact line with Nagorno Karabakh (Artsakh) in the period of July 15-21, the Karabakh Defense Army said in a statement.

The Karabakh frontline units continue controlling the situation on the line of contact and protecting their positions.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said at a meeting with reporters on Friday, July 20 that he is ready to negotiate with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on the process of the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

Turkey and the Netherlands resume full diplomatic ties

Panorama, Armenia
Politics 13:26 21/07/2018 Armenia

Turkey and the Netherlands have agreed to restore relations strained after a diplomatic row last year, Al Jazeera reported. In a joint statement on Friday, the two countries stated their “readiness for normalisation” and that the countries are resuming full diplomatic ties.

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu and his Dutch counterpart Stef Blok met on the sidelines of a NATO summit in Brussels last week.

“To that extent, the ministers agreed to reinstate ambassadors in Ankara and The Hague shortly,” the statement added.

The source reminds that the dispute started when the Netherlands blocked Turkey’s Family Minister Fatma Betul Sayan Kayar from entering the Turkish consulate in Rotterdam in March 2017.
The Dutch government also withdrew landing permission for Cavusoglu’s plane, as the two Turkish politicians sought to campaign to expatriate Turks ahead of Turkey’s April 2017 constitutional referendum in the Netherlands.

In response, Turkey summoned the Dutch envoy to Ankara in protest over the ban, while Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan promised retaliation against Dutch diplomatic flights and called the Dutch government “Nazi remnants”.

Ambassador: The presence of Japanese tourists in Armenia speaks of the country’s safety

Panorama, Armenia
Politics 13:59 21/07/2018 Armenia

Armenia is safe country in terms of terrorist threats another forms of crimes, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Japan to Armenia Jun Yamada stated Saturday at a meeting with the Chief of Armenian National Security Service (NSS) Artur Vanetsyan.

As the press service at NSS reported, Ambassador Yamada attributed that to the effecient of of the security service of Armenia, adding the presence of Japanese tourists in Armenia speaks of the country’s safety.
NBSS Chief Vanetysan expressed condolences over the on the tragic consequences of the recent floods in Japan and the innocents victims.

During the meeting Vanetyan expressed readiness to cooperate with Japanese special services on exchange of information and experience.

The issue of Armenia’s obtaining of special security equipment envisaged for security services was discussed during the meeting. Arthur Vanetsyan noted the meeting will lay firm ground for future cooperation and partnership between the security agencies of the two countries, the release said.

Pashinyan is puzzled that there are still officials in EU who do not notice changes taking place in Armenia

Arminfo, Armenia
Pashinyan is puzzled that there are still officials in EU who do not notice changes taking place in Armenia

July 20

Marianna Mkrtchyan. Armenia did nothing and will not do it for the sake of financial assistance from outside. This was stated by the Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan at a meeting with journalists on July 20, referring to his statement made at the Brussels airport on relations with the EU.

“During all the meetings held within the framework of my visit to Brussels, I clearly stated that, firstly, democracy is not an element of foreign policy orientation for us, it is our belief and faith.

And the processes that have taken place recently in Armenia have demonstrated that this is the embodiment of the political values of our people. Secondly, over the years the EU has stated that it builds relations with the Eastern Partnership countries conditionally speaking by the formula “Greater in exchange for more.” Moreover, it concerned the values known to us – democracy, independent judiciary, transparency, the rule of law, the fight against corruption, “Pashinyan said.

At the same time, he noted that before his visit to Brussels, the European Union declared its readiness to assist Armenia in some way. The head of government stressed that in the course of his well-known statement, he expressed bewilderment that the formula proposed by the EU in fact does not work. “And I am amazed that a number of European officials, during meetings with me, say that they expect changes in Armenia both today and today, and I am surprised that there are still officials in the EU who do not notice the changes that have In order to make everything clear, I gave specific examples, in particular, I informed that today’s government, in two months or even a month, without spending a penny, has done more in the area of fighting corruption, than was done in the interaction with the EU by the former government, spending tens of millions of euros on it. I just said it, “Pashinyan assured.

At the same time, he once again stressed that Armenia did nothing, and will not do for the sake of financial assistance. The head of the Armenian government noted that all that the present authorities are doing, she is doing for the sake of her people and the realization of the mandate that she received from the people. “I want this position to be clear, and we clearly sent our messages to our partners, and we stressed that this is our position and they should get used to it,” the Armenian Prime Minister summed up.

Pashinyan: Armenia will not change foreign policy guidelines

Arminfo, Armenia
Pashinyan: Armenia will not change foreign policy guidelines

 Yerevan July 20

Naira Badalyan. Armenia once again confirms that foreign policy is not expected to change. The Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan at a press conference stated this on July 20, touching on the talks about what a number of Russian experts called the visit of the Armenian government delegation to Brussels during the July NATO summit a provocation.

According to Pashinyan, the government delegation paid a working visit to the Kingdom of Belgium on July 11-13 to attend the NATO summit itself, and at the meeting of the mission in Afghanistan “Resolute Support” in the format of the heads of state and government of the non-member countries of NATO Alliance, which was held as part of the summit of the North Atlantic alliance.

As the prime minister reminded, Armenia earlier repeatedly participated at the level of the head of state in the person of Serzh Sargsyan in the mission’s work. Thus, this visit, as Nikol Pashinyan pointed out, does not mean a change in foreign policy. Only, Armenia does not refuse to fulfill the international obligations taken by the republic before the “velvet revolution,” Pashinyan said.

During his visit to Brussels Nikol Pashinyan met with heads of EU structures. The Prime Minister also met with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.

The NATO mission, called Resolute Support, began operating in Afghanistan on January 1, 2015, after the military stage of the US operation and its alliance allies has been completed. Armenia has been participating in the international security forces in Afghanistan since 2010. Currently, Armenian peacekeepers (131 servicemen), are carrying out the defense of the checkpoint of the Mike-Spann military base and the adjacent territory. All costs for the training and technical support of the contingent of Armenia’s peacekeeping forces in Afghanistan were assumed by Germany.


Nikol Pashinyan did not give up the idea to reduce the powers of the prime minister

Arminfo, Armenia
Nikol Pashinyan did not give up the idea to reduce the powers of the prime minister

Yerevan July 20

Naira Badalyan. The head of the Armenian government plans in the future to review his own powers, enshrined in the new Constitution of the Republic of Armenia. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced this on July 20, commenting on the journalist’s question about “how convenient it is for him to dress as a super-prime minister.”

According to Pashinyan, he did not abandon the idea at the legislative level to reduce the powers of the prime minister. Today, as well as when he was an oppositionist, Nikol Pashinyan believes that there should not be a super-premier institute in Armenia.

As the prime minister pointed out, it is necessary to do this in a way that does not violate the stability of the entire state system. In the future, according to Pashinyan, establishing new powers, Armenia should balance not between the president and the prime minister, but between the government and the parliament, as is done, say, in Germany.

When exactly there will be legislative changes that will lead to the eradication of the institution of super- premiership, established by the “legislative efforts” of the authors of the new Constitution, today the head of the Armenian government refrained from calling.


Yerevan says Russia capable of preventing Armenia-Azerbaijan war

Public Television of Armenia
Yerevan says Russia capable of preventing Armenia-Azerbaijan war

[Armenian News note: the below is translated from Armenian]

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said that Russia has the “levers” to prevent a resumption of war between Baku and Yerevan.

Pashinyan was speaking at a news conference for Armenian journalists in Yerevan on 20 July. The news conference was carried live by Armenian Public TV.

Pashinyan also said that Azerbaijan was not ready to make concessions regarding the Karabakh conflict. He added that he saw no solution to the conflict without Karabakh’s involvement in the peace talks.

Baku and Yerevan are locked in a conflict over Azerbaijan’s breakaway Nagorno-Karabakh region, which, along with seven surrounding districts, came under the control of ethnic Armenian troops in the early 1990s. Peace talks between Baku and Yerevan have been mediated by France, Russia and the United States in their capacity as co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group. The breakaway region is not a party to the talks.

Russia has the “levers”

“I think we all understand that as a super power the Russian Federation is capable of not letting war resume in our region. I cannot believe that Russia, which is Armenia’s strategic partner and friend, will fail to use its levers to not let hostilities resume in the region,” he said.

Pashinyan said that the situation on the border with Azerbaijan was tense, as was the military and political situation in general. He said that the threat of war existed and Armenia had to be prepared for war. At the same time, he expressed belief that Russia would not allow a new war to break out in the region. “I cannot believe that Russia will allow a war or that Russia will fail to use its levers to hold Azerbaijan back from provocation,” he said.

Mutual concessions

Pashinyan said that it was wrong to talk about the resolution of the Karabakh conflict based on the idea of ceding territories around Karabakh to Azerbaijan in exchange for its status.

“Has anyone asked whether this solution is acceptable for Azerbaijan or not? … When we are saying mutual concessions, it means that there are two sides that are ready for concessions. I want to understand why we want to discuss our readiness to go for concessions if it is obvious that Azerbaijan is not ready to go for concessions,” he said.

Pashinyan said that not only the government but the entire nation would decide on the “limits” of mutual concessions “if we get a message that Azerbaijan is ready for concessions”.

“I rule out any solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict that will not be acceptable for our people,” he said.

Pashinyan said there could not be any government in Armenia that would solve the issue in this way. He stressed that one of the important goals of his government was to ensure public involvement in the making of state decisions.

Karabakh and peace talks

Pashinyan reiterated that there could be no solution to the conflict without Karabakh’s direct participation in the peace talks.

“If we are talking about the final resolution of the Artsakh [Karabakh] issue, then Artsakh must be involved,” he said.

Pashinyan said he was ready to hold discussions with the Azerbaijani president, which might be “useful” toward creating an atmosphere of trust. At the same time, he said that Azerbaijan’s continuous “militant and aggressive” rhetoric was unacceptable.

Pashinyan argued that Azerbaijan’s “increased aggressive behaviour” was due to its leadership’s concern that democratic processes might move from Armenia to Azerbaijan.

Meeting with first president

Pashinyan also said that he had discussed the Karabakh conflict settlement with first Armenian President Levon Ter-Petrosyan at the latter’s initiative. He said Ter-Petrosyan wanted to provide him with information that he thought he might not possess.

Pashinyan said the conversation was “very useful” but that he learnt no new information since he was well-informed about all processes regarding Karabakh from the very first day he took office as prime minister on 8 May.

Turkey, Netherlands agree to mend ties, reinstate ambassadors

dpa-AFX International ProFeed, Germany
Friday 3:02 PM GMT
Turkey, Netherlands agree to mend ties, reinstate ambassadors
 
 
By Anindita Ramaswamy, dpa
ISTANBUL (dpa-AFX) – Turkey and the Netherlands have agreed to normalize ties after a row in 2017, when the Dutch government banned Turkish politicians from campaigning ahead of a controversial referendum. The Turkish Foreign Ministry said Friday that the decision was reached during a phone call between Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu and his Dutch counterpart, Stef Blok.
 
The two also agreed to soon reinstate their respective ambassadors in Ankara and The Hague. When they met on the sidelines of last week’s NATO summit, the ministers ‘discussed the regretful events that took place in March 2017, which resulted in a deterioration of the relations between the Netherlands and Turkey,’ the statement said. Turkish politicians were banned from entering the country to conduct election rallies for Turkish expatriates in the Netherlands ahead of a controversial constitutional referendum in Turkey in April. Germany also blocked the events, triggering a backlash from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who called European leaders ‘Nazis.’ Earlier this year, the Dutch parliament voted overwhelmingly in favour of a resolution recognizing the mass killing of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire during World War I as genocide, in a move condemned by Turkey. Ankara in turn accused the Netherlands of turning a blind eye to the genocide of Muslim Bosniaks by Bosnian Serb troops that took place in Srebrenica during the Bosnian War in 1995. However, Cavusoglu and Blok underlined their link as NATO allies for six decades, their trade ties and their history of more than four centuries, the Turkish Foreign Ministry said. Blok will visit Turkey in the second half of the year, it added.

How Britain enables routine, everyday corruption and fraud in former USSR

The Herald (Glasgow), Scotland
Friday
How Britain enables routine, everyday corruption and fraud in former USSR
 
by David Leask
 
 
IN Armenia and Siberia there are questions about millions of dollars of missing tax. In Kazakhstan, holidaymakers are complaining about a hard-sell timeshare scheme.
 
These are all routine stories of crime, corruption and unethical trading published in the former Soviet Union over the last few months.
 
They all have one thing on common: at their very centre is the alleged abuse of a Scottish limited partnership or SLP, the corporate structure long dubbed “Britain’s home-grown secrecy vehicle”.
 
In fact, there are so many international revelations, big and small, about SLPs and similar English, Northern Irish and Scottish entities called limited liability partnerships or LLPs, that we would need a special edition of The Herald just to cover them all.
 
This article catalogues just a few recent scandals to emerge since UK Government – under pressure from the SNP and transparency campaigners – announced in the spring that it would reform SLPs (but not English or Scottish LLPs). A consultation on those changes ends this weekend.
 
Let’s start with a big story from Armenia. Its National Security Service recently arrested three officials at a business called Norfolk Consulting which last year secured a monopoly on handling customs processing for cargo from neighbouring Turkey, China and the United Arab Emirates.
 
The men have been charged with serious tax evasion. Local media suggest some $7 million in import duties has been lost between August of last year and May of this year.
 
Armenia said Norfolk Consulting was owned by a business registered in Edinburgh last year, Norfolk Project. This SLP was created just as the UK Government last summer forced such entities to name a person of significant control, or PSC.
 
This policy was designed to deter abuse. Norfolk Project has named its official owner, a man with an Armenian name who lives in Moscow.
 
The case in Armenia continues. The general director of Norfolk Consulting was last month remanded in custody pending trial.
 
Armenia’s story has echoes thousands of miles away. Journalists in the Siberian republic of Khakassia, part of Russia, are asking questions about tax there. They want to know why a huge open-cast coal mine is selling millions of tonnes of coal at below-market prices to a Russian-registered intermediary, which then sells the fuel on to two British firms. One of those UK businesses is an SLP and shares an Edinburgh address with Norfolk Project. The other is an English LLP. Neither have revealed their owners. Local news sites have found paperwork for the Russian intermediary. One of its beneficiaries, they said, is the 90-year-old father of an MP.
 
Just across the border from Khakassia, in Kazakhstan there is a rolling row with consumers saying they have been given an unfair hard-sell by a holiday company flogging timeshares. Customers entered into deals through the holiday firm with a London LLP and an SLP registered at the same address, a well-known mass mailbox, as Armenia’s Norfolk Project and the Khakassian coal case SLP.
 
At the other end of the old former Soviet Union, in the Latvian capital Riga, there are questions about a lawyer gunned down earlier this year.
 
Martins Bunkus was working on the insolvency of a Trasta Komercbanka, which lost its licence over breaches of money-laundering and counter-terror rules two years ago. Trasta was where shell firms involved in the Russian Laundromat – the biggest ever scandal to feature SLPs and LLPs – had many of their accounts.
 
Mr Bunkus was killed in his Range Rover. He also drove an Aston Martin. Both were leased by a firm ultimately owned by LLPs registered in Milton Keynes.
 
Latvia is currently cleaning up its banks, which have started to drop their offshore clients, including many SLPs and LLPs and their usually secret ultimate owners. It has come under pressure from the US and European Union to do so, not least because of a series of money-laundering scandals involving the rest of the former Soviet Union.
 
Ukraine is the country which most frequently throws up stories involving SLPs and LLPs, frequently with Latvian banks and often with Trasta.
 
Only this week Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau or Nabu announced it was looking at the accounts of the country’s publicly owned research institute for the nitrogen industry. Nitrogen is a big deal in an agriculturally rich place like Ukraine: think fertiliser.
 
Nabu has a formal criminal investigation in to the alleged theft of some $7.5m from the institute, which goes by the Ukrainian acronym UkrGIAP. Detectives from Nabu said the institute had ordered goods and services from seven overseas firms for the $7.5m, with payment up front to Baltic banks. The goods were never delivered, according to court filings made as part of the investigation and reported in local media.
 
The firms paid? Two were SLPs: Fukuyama Invest of Edinburgh’s Montgomery Street and Europe Inter Corp of Glasgow’s Bath Street. Both firms dissolved on the same day almost a year ago. Two were LLPs, both from London.
 
Nabu has secured court permission to ask UK authorities for support in the case. The agency also wants Britain’s help on the “possible theft” of $2.5m from a state enterprise which reconditions aircraft, Aviakon.
 
According to court filings, Aviakon overpaid for new fuel tanks it bought for helicopters from a business in the notorious tax haven of Nevis. Nabu says money from those deals went to offshore firms, including an LLP in Leith and a Berkshire business of the same kind.
 
An LLP from Newcastle been named in the Ukrainian press as part owner of a factory producing cigarettes so cheap there have been questions about whether excise has been paid.
 
An opponent of the now ousted president Viktor Yanukovych, senior Ukrainian MP, Borislav Rozenblat, was last year caught on tape describing how a “Scottish firm” could be used to export Ukrainian amber falsely described as Polish. He denies any wrongdoing.
 
Now Ukraine’s defence ministry is buying military-grade drones from a firm in neighbouring Moldova owned by his wife. The drones were made from parts supplied by an SLP.
 
Chris Law, an SNP MP, earlier this year visited Ukraine as part of a party delegation meeting senior figures in the country. Scottish shell firms were firmly on the agenda, he said. “We were left in no doubt, by those at the highest levels, that SLPs pose a real threat, not only to the Ukrainian economy, but to security as well, as faith in the democratic process is undermined by the dead weight of corruption,” Mr Law said. “Stopping this abuse of SLPs would be probably the most significant support the UK Government could make to help Ukraine to becoming a full democracy, by allowing it to use the wealth it creates for the benefit of the Ukrainian people.”

Macron Pledges to Continue Efforts to Promote Nagorno-Karabakh Settlement – Elysee Palace

Sputnik News Service
Friday 11:49 PM UTC
UPDATE – Macron Pledges to Continue Efforts to Promote Nagorno-Karabakh Settlement – Elysee Palace
 
 
(Updates with quotes on EU-Azerbaijan Comprehensive Agreement in paras 6-8)
 
PARIS, July 20 (Sputnik) – French President Emmanuel Macron assured his Azerbaijani counterpart Ilham Aliyev on Friday that Paris would continue efforts to facilitate the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict’s settlement, the Elysee Palace said.
 
Earlier in the say, Aliyev arrived in Paris for an official visit.
 
“The two presidents discussed the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. France, which is a co-chair of the [OSCE] Minsk Group, bears a special responsibility for ensuring sustainable peace in the region. The president of the republic stressed that he would continue working on the search for a solution on the basis of talks, which is the only option to put an end to the conflict and meet the interests of all peoples in the region,” the statement said.
 
According to the statement, Macron also welcomed the July 11 meeting of the Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign ministers, held in Brussels under the mediation of the OSCE Minsk Group.
 
“The president of the republic will continue watching the situation, and France, jointly with the Russian and US co-chairs, will support any initiative aimed at progress in the settlement,” the statement added.
 
Macron also promised to support the new EU-Azerbaijan Comprehensive Agreement, which is expected to replace the 1996 Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between Baku and the bloc, the statement added.
 
“The president of the republic reassured President Aliyev of his support for the prospect of the new EU-Azerbaijan agreement, which may be signed in the end of the year,” the statement said.
 
Macron also reaffirmed that France was ready to support Azerbaijan in its economic development.
 
Armenian-dominated Nagorno-Karabakh has been locked in a decades-long conflict with Baku since it announced its secession from the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic in 1988.
 
In 1991, the region proclaimed independence from Azerbaijan and the creation of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. This move triggered a military conflict, which led to Baku losing control over the region.
 
The OSCE Minsk Group, chaired by Russia, the United States and France, monitors the situation in the region and has been facilitating peace negotiations since its creation in 1992.