Deputy director of the Investigative Committee Aram Tamazyan has resigned.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has signed an order on relieving Tamazyan from duties at the latter’s request, according to e-gov.am.
Deputy director of the Investigative Committee Aram Tamazyan has resigned.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has signed an order on relieving Tamazyan from duties at the latter’s request, according to e-gov.am.
Large-scale tactical military exercises have kicked off at the Russian military base stationed in Armenia. The drills involve 3,000 troops, TASS reported.
According to TASS, the Southern Military District of Russia, which encompasses the base in Armenia, issued a statement saying that the exercises will run until July 28.
In addition to the 3,000 troops, the exercises involve 500 units of equipment, including air defense, military and unmanned aviation systems.
There is nothing strange in what happened in Panik village, political analyst Alexander Iskandaryan said at a press conference referring to the Russian military drills in the Armenian village.
“This is a very small event. Such incidents have taken place and will take place again. You can’t avoid this,” he said.
According to him the Armenian-Russian relations will not be affected after the incident. He said the relations will remain the same.
“The Armenian-Russian relations are ready for such incidents.
Iskandaryan also talked about the upcoming early parliamentary elections and the Yerevan City Council elections. According to him a power change will take place in the Yerevan City Council too: the Republicans will transfer their position to the political force of PM Nikol Pashinyan.
“Yerevan is 1/3rd of Armenia, and having power here is a very serious priority for any political force. I don’t believe that after the elections people outside the current government will have office in the Yerevan City Council,” he said.
He expressed a similar viewpoint on the parliamentary elections also.
“In addition to Civil Contract party the two other parties would be better off by running under an alliance because this way their chances of appearing in the parliament will be higher. While Civil Contract needs to take someone with it to parliament to have a coalition partner in the future,” Iskandaryan said.
The sooner the early elections take place the greater success the incumbent government will have from the revolutionary euphoria, according to him.
The military alliance between Turkey and Azerbaijan is a source of concern for Armenia because the policy of this alliance is directed against the national security of Armenia, defense minister Davit Tonoyan said in an interview to EADaily when asked whether Turkey is considered to be a threat for Armenia’s security.
“Certainly, the cooperation of the abovementioned two countries is a threat for us, especially when we take into account the fact that Azerbaijan is openly threatening Armenia with war, and Turkey is supporting with all means the realization of Baku’s military intentions,” Tonoyan said, reminding that generally in terms of military cooperation Turkey is Azerbaijan’s main partner.
He noted Armenia’s initiation of an attempt to normalize relations with Turkey in 2008, when official Ankara did not make any steps in response.
“Eventually the process stopped as a result of the preconditions brought forwards by Turkey’s leadership. Turkey continues linking the issue of normalizing bilateral relations with the solution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. But we insist that the best solution will be the establishment of dialogue between Armenia and Turkey without preconditions, which will enable our countries to gradually head in the direction of establishing complete bilateral relations. However, taking into account the failure of the previous process, it is now Turkey’s turn to bring forward a constructive initiative,” Armenia’s defense minister said.
Armenia is cooperating with NATO within the framework of the Individual Partnership Action Plan , which is revised and modernized every 2-3 years. The program is based on realities relating to political and security affairs, and it entirely complies with Armenia’s interests, Armenia’s defense minister Davit Tonoyan told EADaily in an interview when asked to assess the Armenia-NATO relations.
As cooperation pillars, the defense minister pointed out political dialogue, reforms of the defense area, the participation of the Armenian military in NATO peacekeeping missions and educational programs.
Tonoyan attached importance to cooperation with NATO in terms of both multilateral development and international partnership of the Armenian Armed Forces, as well as the military-political processes which are carried out within the framework of the Euro-Atlantic security system.
“We strongly believe that Armenia’s cooperation with NATO doesn’t contradict our collegial obligations within the framework of the CSTO. Moreover, Armenia builds its defense policy by taking into account the interests of CSTO partners and always urges them to act similarly. Armenia has active role in CSTO integration processes. Certainly, the interests of partner states, therefore also policy can’t be identical. We try to approach with understanding the military-political cooperation of our partners with countries which have clear hostile attitude towards Armenia. At the same time it is necessary to work hard over strengthening CSTO collegial mechanisms, in order for a common attitude to be displayed over issues relating to the security of CSTO members countries,” Tonoyan said.
Due to technical and procedural decision the surprise factor of future probable enemy attacks has been ruled out, Armenia’s defense minister Davit Tonoyan told EADaily in an interview.
He said that the Armenian side has drawn many conclusions from the 2016 April War of Artsakh.
“We first of all made military conclusions after the 2016 April battles. Azerbaijan will not be allowed to maintain the position of escalating the situation, the right to monopoly of deciding the time and scale. Conclusions have been made also over a number of practical and strategic issues. As a result we have carried out necessary changes in areas like positioning of troops, implementation of combat missions in the frontline and provision of armaments and equipment,” he said.
According to the minister, conclusions should indeed be drawn from the April War, but it shouldn’t be left in the epicenter of the Armenian side’s military mind.
“Examples aren’t few in military science history when even the most experiences commanders and armies have made mistakes when preparing for the next wars based on results of previous military operations. Therefore, we are widely preparing for probable military operations, taking into account not only previous incidents,” Tonoyan said.
He said that he is concerned over the equipment which Azerbaijan displayed at its latest military exercises, however he said he is more concerned over the fact as to from where and in what conditions these equipment were acquired.
“Eventually, it is up to Azerbaijan that so many necessary financial investments, which could’ve increased the quality of life of its citizens, it is actually directing for the acquisition of attack systems. There are countermeasures for any military equipment, and in this issue the Armenian side certainly doesn’t sit idly. But we are concerned over the sources of acquisition of the military equipment which was presented. It is regretful to see that Armenia’s allied countries are selling weapons to a country which….threatens the existence of Armenia,” Tonoyan said.
Tonoyan drew the attention of the countries dealing with the NK conflict settlement on this issue.
“Especially the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairing countries, which are dealing with the settlement of the Artsakh issue, should refrain from selling various types of assault weapons to Azerbaijan. Eventually, a question arises – why is it needed to breach the existing military balance between two countries in the beginning, and then only attempt to restore it,” he said.
Speaking about media reports that Armenia is planning to acquire Russian SU 30 SM fighter jets, Tonoyan said that now they are considering various models for acquisition, but they have a need to establish dominance in the sky.
“Having a dominant position in the air has always been considered as guarantee for result and achievements in military operations. If until today we have given preference to air defense in the issue of having dominant positions in the air through existing resources, as well as application of the air force, then now we are planning to develop our air force potential. We are considering various models of military aircraft for acquisition,” he said.
Armenia’s defense minister Davit Tonoyan says he is especially concerned over the activation of Azerbaijani armed forces in the Nakhijevan direction of the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, where a relative calm existed until now.
“Any manifestation of military provocation in this section is fraught with incitement of crisis, which will also relate to other regional actors,” Tonoyan said during an interview with EADaily.
At the same time, Tonoyan emphasized that Armenia is not in a status of peace requester and that it might not endure the temptation of using its entire military arsenal in an event of an Azerbaijan aggression.
“Along with Armenia’s constructive stance, I wouldn’t want you to have an impression that Armenia is in a position of a peace requestor. I would advise the Azerbaijani side not to be so certain that it is the one controlling the issue of escalating the military situation. Meaning it will not be the way that mediators will succeed in convincing the Armenian side to stop response-punitive actions in an event of Azerbaijan re-launching military operations, even in an event if limited scale military operations carried out by Baku. In an event of a repetition of the 2016 April War aggression scenario the Armenian side might not refrain from the temptation of using its entire available arsenal to give a massive and decisive counter-blow to the adversary,” Tonoyan said.
Speaking about the dangers of new large scale military operations and Azerbaijani build-ups of manpower and military equipment along the Artsakh-Azerbaijan line of contact, the Armenian defense minister said that the likelihood of resumption of large scale military operations is always high in conditions of Baku’s maximalist demands during negotiations.
“Reports about the activation and build-ups of Azerbaijani military are accurate and similar processes are observed not only at the Artsakh-Azerbaijan line of contact, but also at the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, namely in the Nakhijevan direction. Azerbaijan’s conduct is nothing else but threat to use force, whereas it is the ruling out of the use of force that is the basis of the peaceful settlement process of the NK conflict, like of any other conflict,” he said.
Monday,
Armenian Side ‘Also Responsible’ For Russian Drill Scare
• Satenik Kaghzvantsian
Armenia - Defense Minister Davit Tonoyan speaks to reporters in Panik village,
.
Armenian officials are also to blame for a Russian military exercise that
scared residents of a village in the northwestern Shirak province, Defense
Minister Davit Tonoyan said on Sunday.
His remarks contrasted with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s furious reaction
to the July 17 exercise held by Russian troops in and around the village of
Panik. The sound of gunfire and explosions terrified many local residents, who
were not notified about the drill beforehand.
Pashinian condemned the incident as a “provocation against Armenia’s
sovereignty” when he spoke at a July 19 cabinet meeting in Yerevan.
Tonoyan sounded more cautious during a weekend visit to Panik where he met with
local government officials and the commander of a Russian military base
stationed in Armenia, Colonel Vladimir Yelkanov. He spoke of “mistakes
committed by both the Russian side and the Armenian side.”
“I officially declare that one day before [the exercise] the Russian side
informed [Armenian officials] about the movement of a military column and said
that there will be a training exercise without specifying the site of the
training,” Tonoyan told reporters after the meeting. “From the legal
standpoint, it had to coordinate.”
“But they have admitted their mistake and officially apologized and we have
already drawn conclusions, as a result of which there will be greater
coordination,” he said.
The minister added that not only the Russians but also the Armenian side is
investigating the incident. “As regards the Armenian side, internal inquiries
are being conducted in our agencies with the aim of identifying the guilty,” he
said without going into details.
Panik is located close to one of the two shooting grounds used by the Russian
base headquartered in Gyumri, the administrative center of Shirak.
The base has up to 5,000 soldiers mainly deployed along Armenia’s closed border
with Turkey as well as tanks, armored vehicles, artillery systems and MiG-29
fighter jets. Moscow has bolstered the base with helicopter gunships and other
military hardware since a 2010 Russian-Armenian agreement extended its basing
rights in Armenia to 2044.
Successive Armenian governments have regarded the Russian military presence in
Armenia as a key element of the country’s national security strategy.
Arrested Sarkisian Bodyguard In No Rush To Post Bail
• Naira Bulghadarian
Armenia - Vachagan Ghazarian (R), President Serzh Sarkisian's chief bodyguard,
is pictured at an official event in Yerevan, 11 July 2015.
Former President Serzh Sarkisian’s former chief bodyguard prosecuted on
corruption charges remained in custody on Monday because of failing to post a 1
billion-dram ($2.1 million) bail set by Armenia’s Court of Appeals.
The court granted Vache Ghazarian bail on Friday in a ruling on his appeal
against a lower court’s June 28 decision to sanction his pre-trial arrest.
A spokeswoman for the Special Investigative Service (SIS) told RFE/RL’s
Armenian service (Azatutyun.am) that Ghazarian did not make the hefty payment
as of Monday afternoon. He has therefore not been set free yet, said the
official, Marina Ohanjanian.
Ghazarian’s lawyer, Armen Harutiunian, confirmed the information. He said he
does not know when his client will pay the sum.
Ghazarian, who headed Sarkisian’s security detail for more than two decades,
stands accused of illegally enriching himself and failing to disclose his
assets to a state anti-corruption body.He was detained on June 25 five days
after police raided his apartment in Yerevan and found $1.1 million and 230,000
euros ($267,000) in cash there. He allegedly carried a further $120,000 and 436
million drams ($900,000) in a bag when he was caught outside a commercial bank
in Yerevan.
In a June 25 statement, the National Security Service (NSS) said Ghazarian was
also planning to withdraw 1.5 billion drams ($3.1 million) kept by him and his
wife at another Armenian bank. He claimed that he “forgot” to add these sums to
his official income declarations, according to the statement.
Such declarations are mandatory for Armenia’s high-ranking state officials and
their close relatives. Ghazarian was such an official until being sacked in
late May as first deputy head of a security agency providing bodyguards to the
country’s leaders.
Putin, Pashinian Discuss Eurasian Union
Russia - President Vladimir Putin meets with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol
Pashinian in Moscow, 13 June 2018.
Russian President Vladimir Putin telephoned Armenian Prime Minister Nikol
Pashinian on Monday to discuss close ties between their countries and the
future of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU).
Putin also had separate phone calls earlier in the day with the presidents of
Kazakhstan and Belarus, two other members of the Russian-led trade bloc.
In a short statement, the Kremlin said Putin and Pashinian touched upon “issues
pertaining to the Eurasian Economic Union and bilateral cooperation.” It did
not elaborate.
Pashinian’s press office likewise said that they “exchanged thoughts on further
development of integration processes in the EEU framework.”
The two men most recently held talks in Moscow on June 13. In his opening
remarks at that meeting, Putin pointed to rapidly growing Armenian exports to
Russia. He attributed that to Armenia’s membership in the EEU.
Pashinian has opposed that membership in the past. However, he made clear that
he will not pull his country out of the EEU or the Collective Security Treaty
Organization (CSTO) after sweeping to power in a wave of mass protests in May.
According to the official Armenian readout of the phone call, Pashinian and
Putin also discussed “a number of issues on the agenda of Russian-Armenian
allied relations.” No details were reported.
Last Thursday, Pashinian strongly criticized Russian troops stationed in
Armenia for holding an exercise in an Armenian village that caused panic among
local residents. Speaking at a news conference the following day, the premier
said Yerevan expects Moscow to prevent Azerbaijan from starting another war in
Nagorno-Karabakh.
Armenian Defense Chief Warns Baku
Armenia - Defense Minister Davit Tonoyan (R) visits an Armenian army post on
the border with Azerbaijan's Nakhichevan exclave, 21 July 2018.
Armenia will strike back harder if Azerbaijan again launches offensive military
operations in Nagorno-Karabakh, Defense Minister Davit Tonoyan said in an
interview published on Sunday.
Speaking to the Russian publication EADaily.com , Tonoyan warned Baku against a
repeat of the April 2016 “aggression” against Karabakh which nearly degenerated
into an all-out Armenian-Azerbaijani war.
He said the Armenian military has “drawn conclusions” from the four-day
hostilities that left at least 190 soldiers from both sides dead. Those include
unspecified measures that have “excluded the element of surprise” another
Azerbaijani might have, he said.
“I don’t want you to be left with the impression that Armenia is a solicitor of
peace,” said Tonoyan. “I would advise the Azerbaijani side not to be so
confident that it controls the issue of escalation of the military situation.
It’s not that mediators will manage to convince the Armenian side to suspend
retaliatory punitive actions if the Azerbaijani side resumes hostilities, even
if Baku conducts a military operation of limited scale.”
“In case of a repeat of the scenario of the April 2016 aggression, the Armenian
side may not resist the ‘temptation’ of using its entire arsenal to counter the
enemy in a resolute and large-scale way … Azerbaijan would not be allowed to
retain a monopoly on determining the place, time and scale of escalating the
situation,” he warned.
President Ilham Aliyev and other Azerbaijani leaders regularly threaten a
military solution to the Karabakh conflict. Senior military officials in
Yerevan and Stepanakert say that the Azerbaijani military has deployed more
troops along the “line of contact” around Karabakh since April.
“The war is not over. Only its first phase has ended,” Aliyev said during a
military parade in Baku on June 26. He threatened military strikes against
“strategic” Armenian targets.
During the parade the Azerbaijani army demonstrated 240 pieces of military
equipment, including Belarusian-made Polonez and Israeli-made LORA missiles
which were reportedly purchased by Baku in recent months.
While admitting that Yerevan is “worried” about weapons demonstrated during the
parade, Tonoyan stressed: “There are means of countering any type of weapon and
the Armenian side not sitting idly by.”
Press Review
(Saturday, July 21)
“Zhamanak” welcomes Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s claim that Russia can
prevent a war in Nagorno-Karabakh because it has strong leverage against
Azerbaijan. “Thus Nikol Pashinian placed responsibility for Azerbaijan’s
actions on Russia,” comments the paper. It says Pashinian is sending
“complementary tough messages to Brussels and Moscow,” speculating that he
wants the Russians to appreciate his criticism of the European Union with
concrete gestures on the security front. “These complementary messages are
undoubtedly based on the legitimacy of his government,” it says.
“Hraparak” says that Armenia has grown very dependent on Russia because of
grave security challenges facing it. The paper says the new Armenian government
needs to address this problem.
“Aravot” says that deputy parliament speaker Arpine Hovannisian was wrong to
seemingly insult Daniel Ioannisian, a member of a government working group
dealing with electoral reform, during a recent discussion in the Armenian
parliament. “That is certainly condemnable,” writes the paper. “It’s wrong to
insult anyone, be it a deputy, a worker, an entrepreneur or an unemployed
person. But let’s look at a diametrically opposite scenario and assume that
Daniel Ioannisian or another Pashinian ally branded an HHK member as ‘mentally
retarded.’ How would Facebook Armenians react to that?” The paper believes that
they would hail such insults. Nor would the country’s leading civic groups
issue a joint statement condemning them, it says.
Meanwhile, Davit Harutiunian, a senior member of the former ruling HHK, tells
“Hayots Ashkhar” that despite their lingering differences the government and
the parliamentary forces now agree on “many conceptual issues” relating to
electoral reform.
(Tigran Avetisian)
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2018 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org
Armenia needs all Armenians, from Yerevan to Washington, from Paris to Tokyo, First Deputy Prime Minister Ararat Mirzoyan told representatives of the Armenian community in a meeting at the Armenian Embassy in Washington D.C. USA.
“In Yerevan, in the government, in any private home, in Washington, in Paris, in Tokyo and anywhere where there are any Armenians, we must all realize and have huge responsibility for the chance which has been created in Armenia. I am sure I won’t overestimate to say that we have an exceptional opportunity to increase the reputation of the Armenian nation, to ensure development in Armenia and in the Diaspora,” Mirzoyan said, according to the Voice of America.
The First Deputy PM stated that the Armenian government expects states with democratic values to support them.
“Whatever happens to Armenia, be it success or failure, it won’t be solely the success or failure of our political team. It won’t even be only Armenia’s success or failure.
It will be a trial, success or failure of democracy, democratic values in the world. All governments which by believing or not declare themselves defenders of democracy don’t have an alternative today other than supporting the new government of Yerevan and protecting democracy in Armenia,” he said.
Azerbaijani armed forces have made nearly 150 individual ceasefire violations in one week (July 15 – July 21) in the line of contact, Artsakh’s defense ministry said in a statement.
Artsakh’s military said Azerbaijani forces fired more than 1300 rounds at their positions during the week.
Artsakh said their military controls the tactical-strategic situation and continues its service “confidently”.