Republican Party of Armenia not to nominates candidates for Yerevan Council of Elders election

ARKA, Armenia
Aug 28 2018

YEREVAN, August 28. /ARKA/. The Republican Party of Armenia (HHK) will not nominate candidates for the election to the Council of Elders of Yerevan, slated for September 23, deputy parliament speaker from HHK Eduard Sharmazanov told reporters on Tuesday.

Sharmazanov explained the decision of the party by several factors, one of which is the post-revolutionary situation and because ‘there are more important external and internal challenges than local elections.”   

Sharmazanov said the party is still discussing what political party to support in the forthcoming election. The post of the mayor became vacant after former mayor Taron Margaryan resigned on July 9 amid a corruption scandal.

On August 16, the Armenian government terminated the powers of the Council of Elders. Elections to the Council of Elders are held by party lists. The deadline for parties’ nomination is August 29. The deadline for registration is September 3. The 10-day election campaign is to start a week after the registration is completed.

If a party wins more than 50% of the seats in the Council of Elders, the first number in the party’s list is considered elected mayor.

The Civil Contract party, headed by the Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, nominated a popular actor Hayk Marutyan as a mayoral candidate. The Prosperous Armenia party nominated MP Naira Zohrabyan. 

Candidates for the post of mayor were also nominated by the Zharangutyun (Heritage) Party, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation/Dashnaktsutyun, the Orinats Yerkir (Country of Law) party and the Light alliance of justice minister Artak Zeynalyan.-0-


Angela Merkel concludes visits to Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan

OC Media
Aug 28 2018

Georgian Prime Minister Mamuka Bakhtadze and German Chan­cel­lor Angela Merkel (Facebook)

German Chan­cel­lor Angela Merkel has concluded a three-day long tour to the South Caucasus. During her trip Merkel faced questions about Georgia’s Western ambitions, her position on the region’s conflicts, and human rights abuses in Azer­bai­jan, and also suggested Georgians may soon be able to work in Germany.

Merkel kicked off her South Caucasus tour in Georgia. During her visit to Tbilisi State Uni­ver­si­ty, Merkel said Germany would introduce ‘work quotas for Georgia and West Balkan countries’ that would allow workers from certain fields to work legally in Germany.

At a press-con­fer­ence following her meeting with Georgian Prime Minister Mamuka Bakhtadze, the German Chan­cel­lor said the number of Georgian asylum seekers in Germany had increased after visa lib­er­al­i­sa­tion. The new visa regime, which came into effect for Georgia in March 2017, allowed Georgians to travel without visas to 26 Schengen Area countries for up to three months.

She noted that Prime Minister Bakhtadze had promised ‘the numbers will go down further’, and said the issue was not a ‘big problem’, adding that Germany now con­sid­ered Georgia a ‘safe’ country of origin — something that would simplify depor­ta­tion pro­ce­dures.

Bakhtadze said the number of Georgians seeking asylum in Germany had already decreased by 70% from January.

This, in addition to Georgian organised crime syn­di­cates in Germany and other European countries, led some officials in Tbilisi to speculate that the EU could invoke visa sus­pen­sion mechanism. The mechanism is a part of the visa-free deal and can be activated if the EU faces large numbers of illegal overstays, if it is affecting the security situation, or if a sig­nif­i­cant number legally seek to stay beyond 90 days.

Merkel abstained from making ‘hasty promises’ on Georgia’s inte­gra­tion into the EU, saying that Georgia was not being con­sid­ered an active mem­ber­ship candidate country, as currently only the Western Balkans were on the EU’s enlarge­ment agenda.

Her comments echoed messages from the 5th Eastern Part­ner­ship summit dec­la­ra­tion in November, which left Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine, the EU’s three ‘asso­ci­at­ed’, Eastern partners that aspire for mem­ber­ship, with little promises for EU enlarge­ment beyond the Western Balkans.

Of Georgia’s NATO mem­ber­ship ambitions, Merkel said during a meeting with students that given the conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Germany’s position was not to support a fast-tracked mem­ber­ship for Georgia. The Chan­cel­lor confirmed her support for Georgia’s ter­ri­to­r­i­al integrity and called the situation regarding the conflict zones a ‘great injustice’.

Merkel visited the village Odzisi, on the South Ossetian border, along with the EU Mon­i­tor­ing Mission.

During her two day visit to Georgia, the Chan­cel­lor also met with political oppo­si­tion parties European Georgia and the United National Movement (UNM). After the meeting, Davit Bakradze, pres­i­den­tial candidate from European Georgia, said Merkel had ‘promised’ German support in imple­ment­ing an EU res­o­lu­tion on Georgia’s Otkho­zo­ria-Tatu­nashvili sanctions list.

Merkel started her visit to Armenia on 24 August by paying tribute to victims of the Armenian Genocide at the Tsit­ser­nakabert Memorial in Yerevan. The Chan­cel­lor referred to the 1915–1917 atroc­i­ties against ethnic Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as ‘heinous crimes’ but avoided using the term ‘genocide’. However, she made reference to a 2016 Bundestag res­o­lu­tion recog­nis­ing the Armenian Genocide.

Holding separate meetings with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and President Armen Sarkiss­ian, Merkel vowed her country’s support for the peaceful res­o­lu­tion of conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, express­ing Germany’s readiness to play a more active role in the peace process.

Merkel also promised to help Armenia implement its ‘Com­pre­hen­sive and Enhanced Part­ner­ship Agreement’ with the EU, and com­ple­ment­ed Armenia as exemplary in balancing relations with Russia and the EU.

German Chan­cel­lor walked with Pashinyan and Sarkiss­ian on the pedes­tri­an North Avenue in Yerevan (Facebook)

‘It is unlikely that the EU and Eurasian Economic Union will hold talks in the nearest future, but I think the Armenian example shows that such an oppor­tu­ni­ty might appear in the future’, Merkel said at the press-con­fer­ence.

The EU–Armenia agreement is an alter­na­tive to more com­pre­hen­sive ‘asso­ci­a­tion agree­ments’ between the EU and Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine.

Merkel said she would ‘do every­thing […] to achieve progress’ in visa lib­er­al­i­sa­tion for Armenians wishing to travel to the EU, but also noted that the issue was ‘closely related to migration policy’.

At the end of her visit, the German Chan­cel­lor walked with Pashinyan and Sarkiss­ian on the pedes­tri­an North Avenue in Yerevan, taking selfies with Armenians.

Rather than being greeted by the head of a state like in Armenia and Georgia, in Azer­bai­jan Merkel was welcomed upon landing by the country’s First Deputy Prime Minister Yaqub Eyyubov and the Deputy Foreign Minister Khalaf Khalafov. After visiting the Alley of Martyrs to pay respect to Azer­bai­jani war heroes, Merkel met President Ilham Aliyev.

At a press-con­fer­ence following the meeting, Aliyev commented on the pos­si­bil­i­ty of adding Turk­menistan to the South Caucasus Corridor (SGC), an EU-supported pipeline project to transport natural gas from the Caspian Sea to the EU through Azer­bai­jan, Georgia, and Turkey.

Aliyev said it was up to the Central Asian republic to show the ini­tia­tive.

During the latest NATO summit in Brussels in July, US President Donald Trump called Germany a ‘captive of Russia’, referring to their reliance on Russian gas. The European Union receives about a quarter of its gas from Russia, mostly via Ukraine. This became a concern for some European countries after a series of price disputes over gas between Russia and Ukraine led to Russia cutting off the gas supply.

Worries about the EU’s energy depen­dence on Russia have been exac­er­bat­ed by Nord Stream 2 — a joint venture between Russia’s Gazprom and several European companies to transport Russian gas through an undersea pipeline in the Baltic Sea to Germany’s Greif­swald Bay. Critics have said it is aimed at sidelin­ing Ukraine as a transit country.

Merkel, who supports the Nord Stream 2 project was forced to comment on the issue in Tbilisi, where she reit­er­at­ed her position that Ukraine would remain an important gas transit country.

Angela Merkel and Ilham Aliyev (president.az)

During the press-con­fer­ence in Baku, Merkel called Azer­bai­jan ‘a big factor in the energy diver­si­fi­ca­tion of the EU’ and also hailed the opening of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railroad.

She said a ‘very frank dis­cus­sion’ between her and Aliyev had also touched on the ‘domestic situation’ in Azer­bai­jan, including human rights. The German said she had argued that ‘a strong civil society must be part of an open, secular society’ and ‘made clear’ that Germany would like to see a ‘strong civil society’ in Azer­bai­jan.

Merkel also met with civil society and oppo­si­tion figures, as well as formerly jailed inves­tiga­tive jour­nal­ist Khadija Ismay­ilo­va.

The Chancellor’s visit to Azer­bai­jan was marred by Baku’s earlier decision to deny a visa to a member of the German del­e­ga­tion, MP Albert Weiler, for violating Azer­bai­jani law in visiting Nagorno-Karabakh without Baku’s per­mis­sion. Weiler called the decision ‘unde­mo­c­ra­t­ic’, while Merkel vowed to raise the issue during the visit.

On 23 August, Nagorno-Karabakh’s Foreign Ministry slammed the decision, calling on the inter­na­tion­al community to condemn the practice of black­list­ing those who visit Nagorno-Karabakh, describ­ing it as a ‘gross violation of the rights to free movement’. Azer­bai­jani Foreign Ministry spokesper­son Hikmet Hajiyev stated that being a member of the German par­lia­ment was  ‘no ground to violate another country’s laws’.

While local press critical of the gov­ern­ment were report­ed­ly not allowed at the joint press-con­fer­ence, Aliyev was asked by Deutsche Welle to address the human rights situation in Azer­bai­jan. Aliyev claimed the country was ‘committed to demo­c­ra­t­ic values’ and ‘all freedoms, including freedom of speech and press’ were provided.

‘There are hundreds of press outlets func­tion­ing in Azer­bai­jan, among them are quite a few oppo­si­tion­al ones. That is, no one is per­se­cut­ed, no one is punished for criticism and different point of view in Azer­bai­jan’, stated Aliyev.

In her reply to a similar question, the German Chan­cel­lor noted that dis­cus­sions around demo­c­ra­t­ic standards in Azer­bai­jan were taking place both ‘on a bilateral level and also within the framework of Council of Europe’. ‘We discussed these issues in details’, said Merkel.

Two days prior to Merkel’s visit, Azer­bai­jani political dis­si­dents in Germany held a gathering in front of Merkel’s Berlin residence urging the Chan­cel­lor to raise issues of media and political freedoms, including political prisoners, during her meeting with the Azer­bai­jani leader.  

Merkel’s South Caucasus tour included several gaffes, with a jour­nal­ist from Deutsche Welle acci­den­tal­ly referring to Azer­bai­jan as ‘Afghanistan’ in her question to President Aliyev, the German gov­ern­ment website and official social media channels showing a road with Armenian state flags as footage of Merkel’s trip to Azer­bai­jan, and according to Sputnik Deutsch­land, her official Instagram story showing scenery in Yerevan with the text ‘Guten Morgen aus Aser­baid­schan’, which was report­ed­ly taken down later.

Moderate earthquake – Armenia-azerbaijan-iran Border Reg. – August 28, 2018

Earthquake Report
Aug 28 2018


Shares

Have you felt the shaking? If Yes, tell us by using the I FELT IT form behind the earthquake or at the bottom of this page.
Using our EQ Report iOS or Android app would even be easier and very informative (links in banner above this text).

 

Most important Earthquake Data:

Magnitude : 4.6

Local Time (conversion only below land) : 2018-08-28 16:57:14

GMT/UTC Time : 2018-08-28 12:57:14

Depth (Hypocenter) : 10 km

Depth and Magnitude updates in the list below.

Share your earthquake experience (I Have Felt It) with our readers.
Click on the “I Felt It” button behind the corresponding earthquake. Your earthquake experience is not only important for science, but also for people in the area as well as our global readership.


NUS academic called in for questioning after police report filed on his Facebook posting in July

 The Online Citizen, SIngapore
Aug 28 2018
 
 
NUS academic called in for questioning after police report filed on his Facebook posting in July
 
Danisha Hakeem 2018-08-28 Investigations & Inquiries
 
Adjunct Professor at the Department of Architecture at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Mr Tay Kheng Soon was called in for questioning today (28 Aug) by the police, following a report made as a result of a Facebook discussion on a picture of the Genocide Memorial in Armenia, which he had posted on Facebook on 15 July this year.
 
It appears that the police report was made as a result of his description of the photograph:
 
I reported what I saw, and learnt of the 1,500,000 Armenian Christians who were exterminated by the Ottoman Turks in 1911. It was a case of convert or die.
 
Mr Tay said that a Facebook user by the name of Azhari Ali had accused him of “unfairly singling out Islam”, in reference to the Ottoman Turks, “even though I had no such intention”.
 
Mr Tay told the police that in his discussion with Mr Azhari, he posited the following:
 
[…] no sacred text of whatever religion can be taken literally. Because once such text is rendered in human language the denotations and therefore connotations of language cannot be avoided and therefore texts have to be interpreted in context and meaning.
 
To go by literal interpretation fails to recognise that times and social practices have changed and therefore readings of texts have also to take into account new conditions.
 
Mr Tay then urged the Chief of Police and the Minister of Home Affairs to “together establish guidelines to ascertain what should be appropriate responses to complaints made by the public as to their import.”
 
He added that “if a complaint is substantive, meaning that the issue complained about is of such importance which might lead to violence and major social unrest, then action is called for not otherwise.”

I just came from jurong police hq at their invitation to be interviewed following a report made to the police following my FB discussion with a Azhari Ali.

This was after i posted on FB a picture of the Genocide Memorial i visited in Armenia recently. I reported what i saw and learnt of the 1,500,000 Armenian Christians exterminated by the Ottoman Turks in 1911. It was a case of convert or die. Azhari objected. He felt that i unfairly singled out islam though i had no such intention. I was merely reporting what i saw.

Someone made a police report on what transpired on FB and i was called up to explain my motives. I explained to the police that my role on FB is educational and i explained what i said that seemed to have upset Azhari Ali. I dont know who made the police report and i am not suggesting that Azhari did. I just dont know.

I had said in my intelocution with Azhari Ali that no sacred text of whatever religion can be taken literally. Because once such text is rendered in human language the denotations and therefore connotations of language cannot be avoided and therefore texts have to be interpreted in context and meaning.

For example marrying a 9year old girl child was ok in times past but not ok today.

To go by literal interpretation fails to recognise that times and social practices have changed and therefore readings of texts have also to take into account new conditions.

In my statement to the police i urge the Chief of Police and the Minister of Home Affairs to together establish guidelines to ascertain what should be appropriate responses to complaints made by the public as to their import. If a complaint is substantive, meaning that the issue complain ed about is of such importance which might lead to violence and major social unrest then action is called for not otherwise.

In cases which represent only some irritation felt by an individual then such reports can politely be set aside. Otherwise as in my case so much time and inconvenience is wasted for so many people just because someone is intolerant of views that dont accord with their own

Worse, the complainant has used the police as a weapon against people whose views dont agree with them. Lets not allow the law to be weaponise against academic discussants just to satisfy an individual’s ruffled feelings. Modern Singapore i hope has matured enough to accept robust, sincere and polite discourse.

I should conclude that my police interlocuter acquitted herself very professionally and courteously which made the encounter with the law rather pleasant to my relief!

Mr Tay also expressed his disappointment against the complainant, who he believes “has used the police as a weapon against people whose views don’t agree with them”, and hoped that “modern Singapore has matured enough to accept robust, sincere and polite discourse”.

 
He has also credited his police interlocutor for conducting her investigations “very professionally and courteously, which made the encounter with the law rather pleasant” to his relief.
 
Subsequently, Mr Tay had posted the following:
 
Zai Kuning made a great suggestion. The police should make it a requirement for every person who makes a police report to personally go to the police HQ to explain what and why he or she is aggrieved befor police take action if at all.
 
 
 

Vendettas In Armenia

Tsarizm
Aug 27 2018


Image by Yerevantsi
Komitas Avenue, Yerevan

As the ancient Confucius saying goes, “Before you embark on a journey of revenge, first dig two graves.” Nikol Pashinyan and his zealous prosecutors should remember this truism.

The newly minted prime minister of Armenia, who campaigned on removing corruption from the country’s politics, seems to be taking pages from the time-honored playbook of Third World, tin-pot dictators – the prosecution and jailing of the political opposition. This does not bode well for the judicial future of Armenia, a strategically placed nation in the Caucasus.

New Armenian PM Pays Tribute To Moscow

Former Armenian President Robert Kocharyan was arrested July 26 (and released two weeks later) in a move organized by Mr. Pashinyan and executed by the Armenian security service (“Special Investigative Service”). The charges of constitutional violations from 2008 cover up a deep-set conflict between Mr. Pashinyan and Mr. Kocharyan. I am not vouching personally for Mr. Kocharyan or his past behavior, but from a judicial perspective, these actions seem to be leading Armenia again down a very dangerous road of illegality.

On March 1, 2008, disturbances and clashes over the election eventually led to situations that threatened the life of the nation and led Mr. Kocharyan to proclaim a state of emergency. Ten people were killed and more than 200 were injured during the crisis, including police. The state of emergency was lifted 20 days later.

The simple fact is the Constitutional Court of Armenia has the exclusive jurisdiction to establish the constitutionality of the president’s decree. Mr. Pashinyan’s investigator has breached the principal of lawfulness, meaning he is only entitled to perform actions which are legally authorized. The Armenian Parliament unanimously declared the decree met the requirements of legality, necessity and proportionality. The emergency measures were consistent with Armenia’s obligations under international law, specifically Article 14 of the European Conveniton of Human Rights, the U.N. Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, the U.N. basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials, and the Paris Minimum Standards of Human Rights Norms in a State of Emergency.

Anahit Chilingaryan, a Human Rights Watch analyst based in Yerevan, the capital of Armenia, said: “As a new government sets the agenda in Yerevan, it is high time to consider the excessive use of pretrial detention in politically sensitive trials. One step prosecutors and judges can take right away is to stop the blanket use of pretrial custody. They will also need to ensure that charges are based on sound evidence and are not excessive, intended to silence others, or to settle scores with people whose messages the authorities don’t agree with. Resolving the issue of politically motivated prosecutions will be challenging, but very important to restore faith in Armenia’s criminal justice.”

Laurence Broers, an associate fellow at London-based Chatham House, also opined about the situation, saying that it is questionable whether Armenia’s judiciary will be able to offer Mr. Kocharyan a “credible legal process.”

Azerbaijan Warns Armenia It’s Ready For ‘Large-Scale Military Operations’

“The problem is that Armenia’s justice sector has hardly had time to reform, and the danger is that any failure to uphold the highest standards could make the process look more like ‘victor’s justice’ than a society coming to terms with its past … Pashinyan would do well to look at the lessons from neighboring Georgia, where successive United National Movement and Georgian Dream administrations tainted their wider agendas for political reform with dubious justice meted out to opponents and rivals…and could come back to haunt Pashinyan in the long-term.”

The arrest and prosecution of the former president is only the tip of the iceberg. The new rulers of Armenia are trying to abuse they tried and true bugaboo of fighting corruption to settle old political scores and to go after their political opponents.
Mr. Pashinyan promised to be a temporary leadership figure, but “conveniently” there is no election law and no date for the elections. In the meantime Mr. Pashinyan and his people are engaged in a massive power grab in which their remnants of democracy in Armenia may be destroyed.

If Armenia is serious about pursuing its Western-oriented policy, including more European integration, it needs to abide by international legal and human rights norms, including respecting Council of Europe decisions from 2008, which approved the outcome of the 2008 elections.

America is very much interested in stability for the Caucasus region, the soft underbelly of Europe which has been a hotbed of Islamic terror. Upholding the rule of law in Armenia is paramount to enabling this stability. Violations of human rights and legal norms can be systemically destructive for a country, which is the case of Mr. Kocharyan.

While it is understandable that Mr. Pashinyan is a political novice, he should not cross some red lines, including engaging in a vendetta and destroying the brittle and weak rule of law in Armenia.

Everyone knows that Mr. Kocharyan brought similar charges against Mr. Pashinyan during his reign. Committing the same illegalities will only damage Mr. Pashinyan in the long run.

Originally posted at The Washington Times



Merkel heard what she wanted to hear in Armenia

Vetsnik Kavkaza
Aug 28 2018
27 Aug in 17:32 Susanna Petrosyan, Yerevan. Exclusively for Vestnik Kavkaza

As part of the South Caucasus tour, German Chancellor Angela Merkel visited Armenia, where the visit was called historic. Germany is Armenia’s third largest trade partner after Russia and China. According to the National Statistical Service, in the first half of this year Armenian-German trade increased by 53.6% compared to the same period of last year to $216.6 million. Armenia exports copper, ferromolybdenum and aluminum foil production to Germany, in recent years clothes and other goods also have been exported in small amounts. There are 150 companies with German capital in Armenia, the largest of which is the Zangezur Copper and Molybdenum Combine.

Armenia imports more than 800 types of goods from Germany, including cars, medicines, household items, various equipment. For more than 20 years, Germany has been a donor country for Armenia and contributed to its reforms, as well as the development of hydropower and regional structures. Merkel highly appreciated the peaceful nature of the “velvet” revolution, which took place in the spring and said that Germany “wants to help Armenia in making these bold changes.” During the visit, the sides specified areas for deepening cooperation. In particular, they discussed education, research and economics.

Armenian experts drew attention to the fact that Merkel’s visit coincided with the new conditions that emerged in the country after the “April” revolution: an active fight against corruption, the creation of more healthy and equal business conditions, the protection of small and medium-sized businesses from the previous heavy taxation burden. These and other circumstances can play a significant role in providing a new impulse in the development of bilateral relations, including attracting German investments in the Armenian economy.

“In political terms, we have a dynamic and reliable partnership with Germany, however, the great economic potential has not been used yet,” Armenian Ambassador to Germany Ashot Smbatyan said.

During the Chancellor’s visit, foreign policy issues were also discussed. Merkel again advocated the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. They also touched on Armenia’s cooperation with the EU, including the implementation of the EU-Armenia Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement. Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan said that Armenia does not build foreign policy on the principles of counterbalance and has no intention to make sharp changes in its foreign policy: “We intend to develop relations with Russia within the Eurasian Economic Union and CSTO. At the same time, we intend to develop relations with the EU.” In response, the German Chancellor expressed the opinion that Armenia could serve as an example of how a country can cooperate with Russia and the European Union at the same time.

Armenian experts note that against the background of the processes taking place in some post-Soviet republics, namely their aspirations to enter the EU and NATO, the European leader heard what she wanted to hear in Armenia. Given a number of serious issues, including Russia’s painful reaction to these trends, the Germans seek to place the issues of possible accession of the former Soviet republics to the EU on hold. Given the existence of certain contradictions between Germany and the United States, Berlin seeks to find the right format for its relations with Russia, avoiding all sorts of problems and complications in every possible way.

Ancient Armenian church in Turkey put up for sale for $1.5 million

Panorama, Armenia
Aug 28 2018
Society 11:29 28/08/2018 Armenia

A 300 year-old Armenian church in Turkey’s northwestern city of Bursa has been put up for sale for $1.5 million.

The sales advert of the church located in the Setbasi neighbourhood has been posted on Bursasehirportali.com by a real estate agent on behalf of its owner, since the latter lives abroad, Ermenihaber  reports  .

The 1986 Bursa General Directorate of Foundations, where the building is registered, affirms it is an ancient church. The photos of the building show the dome of the three-story ramshackle church.

According to real estate agent Tayfun Ozenginler, the Setbasi neighbourhood were the church is located was once inhabited by Armenians, adding after the Kemalist movement the church began to be used for many different purposes. 

“You can smell the history in every corner. Before 1980s it served for different purposes, turning into an abandoned building later,” he said.

Bursa and its neighbouring districts were home to a total of 17 Armenian churches before 1915.     

EU and Armenia Seize Momentum to Enhance Partnership and Cooperation

Modern Diplomacy
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2018/08/27/eu-and-armenia-seize-momentum-to-enhance-partnership-and-cooperation/
Aug 27 2018

Published

  

on

 

By

 Angela Amirjanyan 

  • 0 Comments

On the sidelines of recent NATO summit, the leader of Armenian “Velvet revolution”, current Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan had separate talks with the European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker and the president of the European Council Donald Tusk during which the leaders exchanged views on different issues over the further deepening of the Armenia-EU ties. The EU top officials affirmed their commitment to support Armenia’s comprehensive reform agenda. EC president Donald Tusk reaffirmed the EU’s willingness to assist in the future reforms in Armenia, promising a continued support to democracy-building efforts in the country.

“What happened in Armenia was extraordinary and, I must say,very European.The example you set was very promising, and you can expect the European Union’s support in the process of implementing reforms,” Tusk said.

Apparently, branding the “Velvet revolution” in Armenia as European-style movement wasn’t an empty statement rather than a gentle hint about the contribution that EU had in civil society development in Armenia and the investment in the youth through mobility projects in the field of education and training to encourage democratic engagement and civic participation. Undeniably, youth activists and civil society were at the core of the recent revolutionary struggle in Armenia. In this regard, the “Velvet revolution”in Armenia was unique and historic as it involved mainly youth, including schoolchildren and students, who moved to streets to challenge adult society.

After holding the talks with EU leaders, Armenian PM Nikol Pahinyan in his turn voiced sharp criticism of EU for not increasing its financial assistance to Armenia following mass protests that led to change in government which is now committed to zero tolerance approach towards corruption.

“I am surprised that certain officials in the EU haven’t noticed the ongoing changes in Armenia,” he stressed at news conference.

The EU most probably incurred Pashinyan’s reproach for providing financial aid to previous leadership, which haven’t made much progress towards democracy and economic growth, and which often vowed zero tolerance for corruption, but  its anti-corruption rhetoric was more likely an aspiration for the future rather than a practical political agenda.

Indeed, it would be unwise to dispute the veracity of the statements expressed by the EU leaders and Armenian PM, given the EU’s profound impact on Armenia’s democratization, rule of law and good governance, and Armenia’s need to diversify its foreign policy having channels open with the West,and the need for financial support to modernize itself.

To deepen understanding of the vital role EU plays in the transformation of Armenian society, we should delve into the EU’s financial support schemes Armenia benefits from.

Article 8 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) states that ‘‘the Union shall develop a special relationship with neighbouring countries, aiming to establish an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, founded on the values of the Union and characterised by close and peaceful relations based on cooperation’’. The EU distributes its development assistance through its external financing instruments.These are the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (ISP), European Instrument for Democracy & Human Rights (EIDHR), the Partnership Instrument (PI) and the three relevant geographic instruments-the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance II (IPA), the European Neighborhood Instrument (ENI) and the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI).

As known, EU cooperates with Armenia in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy and its eastern regional dimension, the Eastern Partnership. The European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) is the key financial instrument established in 2014 to fund the European Neighborhood Policy for the period 2014-2020. It replaces the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) of 2007-2013. The ENI is designed to promote integration by partner countries into the EU market; economic development; good relations and bilateral and multilateral collaboration; institution and capacity building; democracy, the rule of law and human rights; and orderly and legal movement of people across the EU’s external borders.

Support through the ENI is programmed and given in three different ways:

  1. Bilateral programmes covering Union support to one partner country;
  2. Multi-country programmes which address challenges common to all or a number of partner countries, and regional and sub-regional cooperation between two or more partner countries;
  3. Cross-Border Cooperation programmes between Member States and partner countries taking place along their shared part of the external border of the EU (including Russia).

Armenia participates also in regional programmes funded under the ENI (mainly in environment, energy, transport, culture and youth), in the Eastern Partnership Flagship Initiatives, and in initiatives open to all Neighbour countries: Erasmus+, TAIEX, SIGMA, and the Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF). The NIF in Armenia targets primarily investment projects in energy and transport infrastructure projects. It does so by pooling EU and Member State funds to leverage loans from European financial institutions and contributors in the ENP partner countries.

In addition to the ENI, Armenia is eligible for financial support under the EU thematic programmes: the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace, Civil Society Organisations and Local Authorities, Human Development and Migration & Asylum.

The priorities and indicative allocations for financial assistance to Armenia are set out in the Single Support Framework (SSF). For the programming period 2017-2020 the indicative allocation is EUR 144,000,000 to EUR 176,000,000.

Under the Support Framework the priority sectors selected for support are:

  • Economic development and market opportunities (indicatively 35% of total budget);
  • Strengthening institutions and good governance (indicatively 15% of total budget);
  • Connectivity, energy efficiency, environment and climate change (indicatively 15% of total budget);
  • Mobility and people-to-people contacts (indicatively 15% of total budget);

A key complementary support also will be provided through regional and multi-country programmes for

  • capacity development/institution building and strategic communication
  • ( indicatively 15% of total budget)
  • civil society development (indicatively 5% of total budget).

While analyzing the Programming of the European Neighbourhood Instrument’s Single Support Framework for EU support to Armenia-2017-2020, we see that the main risks to achieving progress vis-à-vis the above-mentioned priority sector objectives are mainly the lack of the promotion and coordination of the relevant policy measures, especially concerning business environment and fair play; government commitment to the reforms in public administration, but especially in the judicial sector, fighting corruption and promoting human rights; governance, in particular   the strategy and prioritization of investments; and political will.

The latter is believed to be sine qua non of any successful anti-corruption policy. Apparently, the new Armenian government has taken a route of intense fight against corruption by making a number of scandalous disclosures, involving high-ranking officials. Other above-mentioned risks can be mitigated through investor-friendly and development-oriented policies to be carried out by the new government. Hence, the future progress towards reform objectives will justify more EU support and investments. New agreement with Armenia, known as the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement (CEPA) initiated by previous authorities, which promises financial assistance and trade opportunities, can become an impetus for further domestic reforms.

So, the new Armenian government should seize the momentum to strengthen the relations with EU to support the democratic aspirations of the Armenians. The EU, in its turn, should make correct use of conditionality and align its approach with Armenia’s strategic objectives.

Princess perfect: How a cruise line has harnessed the stars

The Australian
August 25, 2018 Saturday
Princess perfect: How a cruise line has harnessed the stars
 
by  KATRINA LOBLEY, SUSAN KUROSAWA
 
How a cruise line has harnessed the stars
 
In a meeting room an hour’s run up the I-5 from Hollywood, Gavin MacLeod bursts through the door. The actor, best known for playing Captain Merrill Stubing in the TV series The Love Boat, is singing the show’s theme song at full volume. The showbiz veteran sure knows how to make an entrance.
 
The razzmatazz unfolds in the most incongruous of settings.
 
Princess Cruises’ global HQ is in Santa Clarita, a city not usually on tourists’ radars, unless they’re into roller-coasters and zipping to the Magic Mountain theme park.
 
Chatting with MacLeod is part of a behind-the-scenes look at how Princess buffs and polishes passenger experiences for its 17 ships until they’re as shiny as an Oscar statuette.
 
In May, Princess Cruises and The Love Boat’s original cast received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. The much-loved show, which ran on television screens from 1977-86, was mainly set on a real Princess ship. Today, passengers who switch on their cabin’s TV can catch re-runs and see the cast reunited in a tongue-in-cheek safety video.
 
MacLeod has been Princess’s global ambassador for 32 years. After watching him in action for an hour, fielding any question thrown his way and dealing with starstruck Princess employees who bump into him on his way out of the building, it seems like the guy who grew up in Pleasantville, New York, is indeed a brand ambassador straight from central casting.
 
Santa Clarita is also home to Princess’s -rehearsal studios, where the ships’ stage shows are finessed. Here, 15 dancers from across the world, including Australia, are rehearsing a disco-themed show in their active wear and dance shoes. Taped lines on the floor guide them to the right spot for spacing and pre-programmed lighting. They must find their marks while keeping up those high kicks and dazzling smiles.
 
The building also houses $500,000 worth of shoes. Some feature non-slip rubber soles, others leather soles for ballroom-style gliding. High heels are braced so they don’t snap off when women land after a lift. Each dancer typically takes 10 pairs aboard for the season. With 17 ships to staff and each ship a home away from home for two casts a year, that adds up to a lot of expensive footwear.
 
The shoes share space with kaleidoscopic racks of costumes from retired shows. Still in good shape, these fantasias might emerge for a cameo such as a single show aboard a three-month-long cruise. As storage space tightens, the line donates the handmade costumes to appreciative local theatres and dance schools.
 
Many of the spangled outfits come from Silvia’s Costumes, a revered Hollywood workshop. Silvia Tchakmakjian, with her -“Armenian army” of designers, pattern–makers, cutters, fitters and beaders, creates costumes for a galaxy of stars such as Dolly Parton, Taylor Swift, Lady Gaga, Pink, Jennifer Lopez, Katy Perry and pint-sized Danny DeVito. Signed publicity photos from many hang in the workshop’s foyer.
 
Her team also works to breathtakingly short deadlines. “I’m going to tell in front of them,” the straight-shooting Tchakmakjian says, nodding at the Princess representatives in the room. “They don’t ever give me enough time.” Her workshop is in demand not only for the quality of its work, particularly beading, but because she delivers on time.
 
Yet even Silvia’s can cut it fine. One story involves Tchakmakjian inviting a FedEx man inside to enjoy a little Armenian food, turning up the music and encouraging him to dance, while her army was putting finishing touches to the costumes he was there to pick up.
 
It’s a short run from Silvia’s up to Griffith Observatory. Before darkness falls, though, Princess combines two of its illuminati with a dinner at neighbourhood eatery Electric Owl. Chef Ernesto Uchimura created a signature burger, the Ernesto, for Princess’s The Salty Dog Gastropub aboard select ships.
 
Cruise Critic gave this tongue-tingling burger, which includes caramelised kimchi and beer–battered jalapenos, the title of Best Burger at Sea. This month, Princess -announced the burger was available on land for the first time at Electric Owl.
 
At the dinner table is former gun-carrying teen gangster turned astrophysicist Hakeem Oluseyi. His story is the kind of Cinderella-style fairytale Tinseltown loves. His series of space-themed lectures, filmed while cruising the Mediterranean aboard Island Princess, can be viewed in cabins across the Princess fleet. At the art deco observatory he shares titbits about the stars, which are struggling to compete with the glittering streetlights that map out the sprawl of Los Angeles.
 
Stars? The town’s full of ’em. One of the most unusual, Kermit the Frog, appears to burst through a wall at the Hollywood headquarters of Jim Henson’s Creature Shop. Princess worked with the renowned company to create life-size puppets that appear in its stage show The Secret Silk, rolling out this year aboard Royal Princess, Island Princess and Diamond Princess.
 
Another three Princess ships – Emerald, Ruby and Sun – feature Australian chef -Curtis Stone’s specialty restaurant Share. Stone’s touch is evident on other Princess ships, too, thanks to his dishes featuring on menus in the main dining rooms.
 
He’s made it big in LA with television cooking shows, his newly wine-centric Beverly Hills fine-diner Maude, and its more boisterous meat-centric Hollywood counterpart, Gwen. Outside Gwen’s butcher shop, on Sunset Boulevard, Stone jumps up into the back of a produce truck to taste-test strawberries, corn, golden raisins and purple daikon radish. Passers-by pause when they recognise the strapping figure in chef’s whites and navy butcher’s apron.
 
Certainly, Stone knows how to fast-track his way to people’s hearts. He pauses to say: “We make great coffees here. Cappuccino? Latte? Americano?” He memorises the complicated orders and makes them happen.
 
Stars come in all shapes and sizes but, for me, it’s how they behave away from the limelight that really floats my boat.
 
Katrina Lobley was a guest of Princess Cruises.
 
IN THE KNOW Majestic Princess will arrive in Sydney on September 15 for its inaugural season down under. With capacity for 3560 passengers, the new mega-liner is the largest Princess ship to sail in Australian waters. Princess Cruises announced this week that its fifth Royal Class liner, Enchanted Princess, is scheduled to launch on June 15, 2020 with a series of European summer voyages. It can’t be easy coming up with ship names, whether river or ocean (surely all the celestial, propitious weather and musical terms are taken), but the Enchanted label has a certain dreamy elegance about it and the 3660-passenger liner will be followed in 2022 by the debut of the sixth member of the Royal Class fleet. The line is in expansion mode with two Liquefied Natural Gas powered ships also on order. Meantime, construction of Enchanted Princess will take place in Italy’s Fincantieri Monfalcone shipyard and bookings will open for the maiden season on November 8 this year.
 
â–  princess.com SUSAN KUROSAWA
 
More to the story When Princess Cruises wanted to rethink its passenger sleep experience, including the 44,000 mattresses aboard its fleet, it turned to LA celebrity sleep doctor Michael Breus.
 
The fresh-faced doctor (pictured), whose clients include actors, musicians and athletes, says his “superpower” is distilling complicated sleep research into bite-sized chunks – a power that’s in demand because there’s a “sleep-deprivation epidemic”.
 
Want to alleviate jet lag? Use daylight to reset the body clock. “Light is the same as a cup of coffee for your brain except it lasts longer and helps shift that circadian rhythm,” he says. To induce sleepiness, eat a bedtime snack that’s about 70 per cent carbs and 30 per cent protein, such as cheese and crackers, nut butter on apple, or avocado on toast.
 
A hot bath or shower raises your core temperature and, as the body cools, releases the sleep-inducing hormone melatonin.
 
Princess passengers have access to a bag of sleep-inducing goodies designed by Breus, including lavender spray, earplugs, eye mask and accessories for that pre-bed hot shower. They also get to loll in a bed fitted with a soft-as-a-cloud mattress topper, removable for those who prefer a firm mattress. KATRINA LOBLEY
 
 

Book Review: The Shoemaker and His Daughter review: a personal glimpse of Soviet Union

The Irish Times

August 25, 2018 Saturday


Conor O’Clery draws on wife’s family history to map turbulent events and a path to Siberia



by Kathleen MacMahon

Stanislav Suvorov is Conor O’Clery’s father-in-law and the father of his wife Zhanna.

In the many accounts of the history of the world, the importance of good footwear is surely under-represented. The Shoemaker and His Daughter goes some way towards addressing this deficit, telling us that the production of an innovative new type of military boot in wartime Russia was of equal importance in defeating the Germans as the invention of the Katyusha rocket launcher. We learn that Khrushchev himself “once said that in his early days in tsarist Russia every villager dreamed of owning a pair of boots”. Even after the war, the quality of mass-produced shoes in the Soviet Union remained poor. “Protruding nails, inadequate waterproofing, cardboard vamps – uppers – and even heels tacked on in the wrong place” were common complaints.

No surprise then that the titular shoemaker of this fascinating personal history becomes a self-made man in postwar Grozny by running a clandestine workshop at the back of his house producing bespoke shoes and boots. Stanislav Suvorov was Conor O’Clery’s father-in-law – father of his wife, Zhanna – and through the story of their family O’Clery takes us deep into the history of the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Russia.

The family tree at the start of the book gives a preview of the tangled web of relationships the reader is about to enter. The politics are complicated too, following the Suvorovs from their origins in Nagorno-Karabakh and Chechnya to a remote city in Siberia, from the Stalinist era to that of Putin. O’Clery’s use of this one family as a viewfinder renders this vastly dense history easily navigable. Everything becomes personal, from the party system of patronage that rewards the skills of the shoemaker – again the importance of footwear – to the nuclear missile installation that lurks behind the trees at the summer dacha the Suvorovs buy in the 1980s.

The Suvorovs are Armenians. They’ve made their home in Grozny, the Chechen capital. In a place of relative bounty compared with other parts of the Soviet Union, the young Stanislav and his highly capable wife, Marietta, carve out a good life for themselves under Khrushchev, with a standard of living comparable to that of a middle-class American family. They have a nice house, with a garden where they grow fruit and vegetables. Most of all, they have a car – a blue Volga sedan – bought on the black market and later sold at a profit. But the sale brings about an abrupt reversal in the family’s fortunes when the shoemaker is arrested and jailed for violating the Soviet ban on profiteering.

Stanislav’s jail sentence haunts the family, driving them on his release to abandon their Grozny home, with its apricot trees and jasmine, and move to Siberia. They settle in the city of Krasnoyarsk, where Zhanna’s school closes only when the temperature drops to minus 51, and where “the metallic cold outside, the depressing landscape of factories and prisons and the polluted air”, are mitigated by a climate of greater freedom. People are not afraid to speak out, because “what can Moscow do? Send them to Siberia?”

Through Zhanna’s story we experience the isolation of life in Soviet Russia where “near abroad” is Latvia and Armenia, while “real abroad” extends only to Romania and Bulgaria. When Zhanna is brought as a translator on a Mediterranean cruise in 1983 she is warned by the KGB not to give any foreigner her home address. Her relationship with O’Clery – a romance he recounts with a shy discretion that is nonetheless touching – brings the KGB down on her again.

Zhanna has grown up unaware of what Gorbachev calls “the blank pages of history”, but with the advent of glasnost “people wonder not just what the future will look like in a year’s time but what their past will look like”. The Moscow beauty spot the O’Clerys can see from their balcony turns out to hold the mass graves of Stalin’s victims. The system Zhanna once respected was founded on “lies and monstrous crimes”. Added to her disillusion is the loss of her parents’ savings in the hyperinflation that follows the collapse of communism, the growing criminality, and the ethnic conflict ravaging their home place in the southern Caucasus.

This history is told in the present tense, which gives it immediacy, and O’Clery, who retired from The Irish Times in 2005, after reporting from Washington, DC, as well as from Moscow, is an elegant and scrupulous writer. His consistently excellent reportage is further enriched by Zhanna’s memories. Memories of the four-day train journey with her grandmother from Grozny to Moscow where they lined up to see Lenin’s embalmed body. Memories of the “magic briefcase” her father would open to reveal scarce treats like sausages and sweets, and the summer picnics of roast lamb and aubergine the family enjoyed in the subarctic forests of Siberia.

In this detail there is for the reader the fascination of other lives lived, in other places, in the grip of turbulent events.

          
Book Title:
The Shoemaker and His Daughter

ISBN-13:
978-1781620434

Author:
Conor O’Clery

Publisher:
Doubleday Ireland

Guideline Price:
£14.99

Kathleen MacMahon’s most recent novel is
The Long Hot Summer