Category: 2018

Dear Friends,

                                        Tuesday, 
Pashinian Urges Yerevan Voters To Reaffirm Victory Of ‘Revolution’
        • Karlen Aslanian
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian speaks at a rally for Yerevan mayoral 
candidate Hayk Marutian, Yerevan, 10Sep2018
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian called on voters in Yerevan to reaffirm 
the results of last spring’s “velvet revolution” in an upcoming ballot in the 
capital – the first major election in Armenia since the change of government.
Twelve parties and alliances are contesting the ballot in which Yerevan’s 
municipal assembly and eventually mayor will be elected.
A pro-Pashinian alliance in the elections called My Step is led by popular 
actor and producer Hayk Marutian.
Speaking at a rally launching the My Step campaign on Monday night Pashinian 
said that more than just a mayoral position and Marutian’s candidacy were at 
stake.
“Those who vote for My Step and for Hayk Marutian vote for early parliamentary 
elections,” he said.
The holding of early parliamentary elections within a year is part of the 
program of the Pashinian government approved last May.
Under the current Constitution, snap general elections can be held only if the 
prime minister resigns and lawmakers twice fail to elect his or her replacement.
In the past several weeks Pashinian publicly spoke of scenarios in which former 
President Serzh Sarkisian’s Republican Party of Armenia (HHK) that still 
dominates the National Assembly could break political agreements and try to 
install another prime minister if he steps down as prime minister. As an 
additional safeguard he, therefore, suggested a constitutional amendment that 
would allow the parliament to dissolve itself.
Addressing the pro-Marutian rally, Pashinian warned other political parties and 
groups, which he did not name, against planning a “counterrevolution.”
“Some political forces that present themselves as advocates of the revolution 
are conducting negotiations with the HHK for the latter to help them with their 
vote-rigging resource,” Pashinian asserted. “Come to your senses, madmen!”
The head of the Armenian government said, therefore, the September 23 vote has 
an “exceptionally important political meaning.” “As at these elections people, 
citizens of Armenia at polling stations should reaffirm the victory that they 
registered in Republic Square…, reaffirm people’s power, the victory of the 
people’s nonviolent velvet revolution in Armenia,” Pashinian underscored.
My Step’s candidate Marutian, who was one of the active Pashinian supporters 
during peaceful antigovernment protests in spring, was criticizes by political 
rivals last week for his remarks in which he made a division of the political 
spectrum into “whites and blacks” ahead of the Yerevan elections.
“It’s a very clear situation in Armenia today. There are white forces and black 
forces. I want to officially state that we are white forces, and all those who 
do not want us to succeed are black forces,” Marutian said on September 2.
The remarks were swiftly construed by representatives of the former government 
as discrimination against part of society that does not share the ideas of the 
political team that came to power in Armenia in the wake of last spring’s 
‘velvet revolution’.
Marutian later publicly regretted having used the expression. Pashinian then 
weighed in on the issue, acknowledging that Marutian’s remarks were “not quite 
correct.”
The HHK is not participating in the Yerevan elections. Its senior member Taron 
Markarian resigned in July after serving as Yerevan mayor for seven years. The 
Council of Elders could not elect a new mayor, triggering early elections.
Armenia Expounds On Planned Syria Mission
        • Sargis Harutyunyan
Syria - Russian soldiers distribute humanitarian aid sent by Armenia in Aleppo, 
14Feb2017.
Armenia will engage in a humanitarian mission in Syria by sending mostly 
doctors and engineers, according to a senior Defense Ministry official in 
Yerevan.
Following his talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on 
September 8 Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian announced a joint Armenian-Russian 
humanitarian program for Syria, but did not disclose any details.
In an interview with RFE/RL’s Armenian service (Azatutyun.am) on Tuesday Deputy 
Defense Minister Gabriel Balayan said that the Armenian mission will be 
operating in the war-torn Middle Eastern country within the framework of a 2015 
UN Security Council resolution and an intergovernmental agreement with the 
Syrian government.
“The non-military group will be exclusively subordinated to the relevant 
department of the Republic of Armenia. We do not rule out cooperation with 
Russia in some ways, but the group will operate exclusively under the flag of 
the Republic of Armenia,” he said.
As for the mission, Balayan said that Armenian medics and engineers will help 
civilians in Aleppo, including ethnic Armenians living in this Syrian city.
“At the request of the Syrian government we will be sending specialists who 
will try to be of help to civilians,” the Armenian deputy defense minister 
said, adding that Armenian sappers will help demine and destroy self-made mines 
that have been stockpiled in Aleppo.
Aleppo was home to the majority of an estimated 80,000 ethnic Armenians who 
lived in Syria before the outbreak of the conflict in 2011. Tens of thousands 
of Syrian Armenians fled their homes since the start of hostilities in the Arab 
republic. Many of the displaced Armenians took refuge in Armenia.
Speaking in Yerevan on Tuesday, Armenian Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanian 
also confirmed that Armenian specialists in Syria will be involved “exclusively 
in the humanitarian context of security.”
“The security of Armenians living in Syria is one of the major issues on our 
agenda,” the top Armenian diplomat stressed.
In recent years the Armenian government sent several planeloads of humanitarian 
assistance to civilians in Syria. The relief was delivered to the war-torn 
country by Russian transport planes.
Receiving Syria’s ambassador in Yerevan Muhammad Haj Ibrahim last week Armenian 
Parliament Speaker Ara Babloyan said Yerevan was willing to take part in the 
reconstruction of Syria. He did not elaborate.
Russia, which has helped Syrian government forces to restore control over much 
of the country’s territory, has been seeking greater Western involvement in the 
reconstruction of Syria. The United States and its allies, however, are tying 
reconstruction assistance to a process that includes UN-supervised elections 
and a political transition in Syria. Washington blames Syrian President Bashar 
al-Assad for the country’s devastation.
Armenian PM Condemns Wiretapping Of Top Law-Enforcement Officials
Armenia - National Security Service Director Artur Vanetsian and Special 
Investigation Service head Sasun Khachatrian comment on the wiretapping scandal 
in a press conference in Yerevan, 11Sept, 2018
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian has condemned the wiretapping and 
posting of telephone conversations that took place between the chiefs of 
security and investigation agencies in late July and concerned the prosecution 
of ex-president Robert Kocharian and other former officials in connection with 
2008 deadly post-election events.
The audio of the conversations between National Security Service (NSS) Director 
Artur Vanetsian and Special Investigation Service (SIS) head Sasun Khachatrian, 
both of whom have confirmed its autheticisty, was leaked to the media and 
published by several news websites on Tuesday.
Based on the contents of the recording critics have accused the Pashinian 
administration of reneging on its public pledge not to guide the work of the 
judiciary.
In the audio Vanetsian and Khachatrian discuss particular circumstances of the 
case against Kocharian, who is charged with overthrowing Armenia’s 
constitutional order during the 2008 violence in which 10 people were killed.
In particular, Vanetsian says that the judge who was supposed to decide on 
Kocharian’s arrest was afraid to make a decision and telephoned him to ask for 
directions. In the audio the NSS chief also repeatedly warned the SIS head not 
to arrest former deputy defense minister Yuri Khachaturov, who currently serves 
as secretary-general of the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty 
Organization. Vanetsian explained that Khachaturov’s arrest could entail 
“political problems.”
Reacting to the wiretapped conversations, the office of Kocharian issued a 
statement today, describing the case as “a classical example of a political 
vendetta.”
In a live Facebook broadcast later today Pashinian condemned the fact of the 
secrete recording and posting of an audio with a telephone conversation between 
two security agencies chiefs. At the same time, he put a brave face on the 
situation, doubting the value of the “revelation” and its implications.
Referring to his earlier public statements in which he repeatedly said that he 
would not use his office to influence the judiciary, the prime minister 
emphasized that he did not say that judges, most of whom were appointed still 
by the former “corrupt” system, did not continue to call and ask for guidance.
Armenia -- Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian comments on the wiretapping scandal 
in a live Facebook broadcast, Yerevan, 11Sep2018
“Still at a rally in Yerevan’s Republic Square on August 17 I stated that in 
general, in my opinion, the March 1, 2008 case was disclosed and that murderers 
will be brought to justice,” he said. “I have said before that judges were 
calling and asking what they should do, how they should decide on one matter or 
another.There is no secret in it. And I have said that I refuse to give 
instructions to the judiciary,” Pashinian said.
The prime minister suggested that a number of former “small and large” 
officials, including Kocharian, ex-president Serzh Sarkisian, ex-prime minister 
Hovik Abrahamian, ex-Yerevan mayor Taron Markarian and others, were interested 
in thwarting the process of justice in Armenia. But he stressed that his 
government “will not yield to blackmail.”
“The case of March 1, 2008 must be disclosed, the murderers must be brought to 
justice, what has been plundered must be recovered,” Pashinian declared in a 
stern tone.
The prime minister stressed that his government will continue an uncompromising 
struggle against corruption and urged people to turn out in large numbers for a 
campaign rally of his ally, Hayk Marutian, who is running for Yerevan mayor, 
which was planned to be held in one of Yerevan’s neighborhoods on Tuesday 
night. Pashinian stressed that this way people will show their support for his 
government and its fight against corruption.
Later, at the rally, Pashinian described the wiretapping of the security 
official as “a conspiracy and crime against the statehood of Armenia.” “I have 
instructed the National Security Service, the police to find those who 
organized the conspiracy within the shortest possible period of time and hold 
them accountable in the strictest terms,” the Armenian premier said.
Pashinian ordered security services to start raids to “disarm oligarchs and 
their so-called bodyguards” who had “imported wiretapping equipment and set up 
their own special services within the state.”
Meanwhile, at a joint press conference with the SIS head held the same day NSS 
Director Vanetsian said that a criminal case was launched in connection with 
the fact of the wiretapping. He voiced confidence that those responsible will 
be held accountable.
As for the contents of the coversation, Vanetsian said they discussed legal 
issues connected with the cases of two senior former officials. At the same 
time, he stressed that the fight against corruption and crime will continue.
“Money plundered from Armenia will be recovered and the murderers will appear 
in court. This process is unstoppable,” the NSS chief declared.
Special Army Units Accused Of Firing At People In 2008 Post-Election Unrest
Armenia -- Tanks on the streets of Yerevan following deadly clashes, March 2, 
2008
The army not only participated in quelling post-election protests in Armenia in 
2008, but also fired at people and residential buildings, a top Armenian 
investigator insisted on Tuesday, referring to special army units allegedly 
formed by former authorities for the purpose.
Sasun Khachatrian, the head of the Special Investigative Service (SSS), held a 
joint press conference with Director of the National Security Service (NSS) 
Artur Vanetsian convened at short notice following a wiretapping scandal that 
broke out on Tuesday.
A secretly recorded audio of telephone conversations of the two concerning the 
prosecution of ex-President Robert Kocharian and other former officials in 
connection with the deadly events of March 1-2, 2008 was leaked to the press by 
an anonymous source in an apparent attempt to show that the administration of 
recently elected Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian allegedly influenced the 
judiciary in related cases.
Pashinian, who came to power on the wave of last spring’s peaceful street 
protests with an agenda of political reforms and anti-corruption struggle, has 
brushed aside the accusations, stressing that his government “will not yield to 
blackmail” and will press ahead with anti-corruption cases and reopened 
investigations into alleged crimes committed by former officials.
Kocharian and several other senior former officials are accused of breaching 
the constitution by ordering the use of the army to quell opposition protests 
in the wake of a disputed presidential election in 2008. Ten people, including 
two security officers, were killed in the violence.
The investigation of the events conducted during the 10-year presidency of 
Serzh Sarkisian, Kocharian’s longtime ally and hand-picked successor, revealed 
no one who could be charged in connection with the killings.
After the change of government ex-president Kocharian was arrested on July 28, 
but an appeals court released him on August 13, finding that the Armenian 
constitution gives him immunity from prosecution. Prosecutors have appealed the 
decision at a higher judicial instance since. In the meantime, a decision has 
been made not to allow Kocharian to leave Armenia pending investigation.
At today’s press conference SIS head Khachatrian disclosed some details of the 
investigation, arguing that investigators have proof of the army’s involvement 
in the events.
“Our investigation has already established that the army not only participated 
in the events of March 1-2, 2008, but also fired in the direction of people, 
apartments, that is, the army fully participated in these actions. Secondly, I 
want to disclose more details that I frankly did not want to do, but today 
there is an occasion for that and the public should know it. After the secret 
order when it was decided to gather servicemen from different military units in 
Yerevan, soldiers were in service at border posts without shifts, as a result a 
very dangerous situation was created, and you know that there was an 
[Azerbaijani commando] raid,” Khachatrian said.
Special Investigation Service head Sasun Khachatrian, Yerevan, 11Sept, 2018
According to the top investigator, the most disgraceful thing that happened to 
the army during those days was that the country’s then leaders “turned soldier 
into mercenaries and used them against the people.”
“Within the framework of the criminal case it has already been established that 
in the period after February 23, [2008] and until March 7-8, [2008] oligarchs 
gave money to soldiers to protect them, their property, their political 
aspirations,” the SIS head said, showing an original register “with names and 
signatures of soldiers and their commanders and sums of payments that were made 
from [bank] accounts of oligarchs and senior officials.”
When asked whether the SIS was going to make those names public, Khachatrian 
replied: “I will give the names later. Why name them now? Only for them to run 
away?”
Press Review
“Haykakan Zhamanak” suggests that despite the speculation that the Russian 
leadership has prohibited the country’s ethnic Armenian businessmen to make 
investments in Armenia it has not found at least one such businessman who would 
confirm that. “It is not difficult to guess where that speculation comes from. 
During the days of the revolution representatives of the already former 
government spared no effort to make an impression of having the Kremlin’s 
backing in order to stop the revolution and shore up their positions. A group 
of Russia-based Armenian businessmen, who had managed to establish some times 
with Russian political elites, were helping them with that. That help, however, 
in no way thwarted the course of the revolution, and the same group is 
currently trying to economically sabotage the current government,” the paper 
writes.
On the same subject “Zhoghovurd” reports, citing its own sources, that Armenian 
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s meeting with ethnic Armenian businessmen in 
Moscow went not quite smoothly. “Those who gathered there were mainly 
businessmen tied to the former government in different ways, businessmen who 
did not feel quite comfortable working with Armenia’s new government. Many of 
them attended the meeting as observers. Some in private conversations with each 
other said that they would no longer invest in Armenia because they feared the 
new Armenian government would cause them additional headache – they don’t want 
to make investments facing the prospect of being put behind bars,” the paper 
says.
“If the Civil Contract party wins a majority, then I am against joining it 
purely for coming to power,” Aram Sargsian, the leader of the Hanrapetutyun 
party and an ally of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian in the current parliament, 
told “Zhamanak”, speaking about the prospect of early parliamentary elections. 
“The issue of the Yelk alliance appears to have been closed, and the sides 
involved know all too well that it is dictated by the political situation. 
Regardless of the different personal and political motivations of the 
participants of the alliance, the logic of domestic and external political 
realities makes it more important not to preserve the Yelk alliance, which was 
a mechanism formed within the logic of the former political configuration, but 
to form a new logic and a new system corresponding to the new situation,” the 
paper writes.
(Tigran Avetisian)
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2018 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org

Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijani Opposition Press
 Monday
Russia is not interested in Armenia's withdrawal from the zone of its influence
 ASTNA.biz
- What can you say about the outcome of the meeting between the Prime
Minister of Armenia and the President of Russia?
-The meeting once again confirmed that Russia does not want the
accelerated withdrawal of Armenia from its control. Even before the
meeting, the Armenian President said that "it would be naive to expect
any result from this meeting." Indeed, it was hardly worth expecting
Russia to offer Armenia a new roadmap. On the other hand, Armenia is
not in a position to completely move away from Russia. During this
meeting, the existing projects between Russia and Armenia were more
affected.
The talk is the supply of the Russian gas to Armenia, the
participation of the Russian Federation in the modernization of the
Hrazdan nuclear power plant, the growth of investments by Russian
entrepreneurs in the Armenian economy.
Naturally, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was also discussed. The
Russian side called on Armenia to make compromises.
Pashinyan's answer to Putin "To compromise before the threats of
Azerbaijan would look like our weakness" was in fact an attempt to
move the arrows in the other direction.
In fact, Russia has made sure that the Armenian Armed Forces will take
part in the humanitarian mission in Syria. This should be understood
as compelling Russia to again operate in Armenia within its own
interests.
After Pashinyan"s coming to power in Armenia, the relations between
Yerevan and Moscow became somewhat colder. Therefore, it was expected
that the meeting between Pashinyan and Putin would take place in a
tense atmosphere. However, after the meeting, Pashinyan said that the
talks were held in normal conditions. Is it possible that tension
between the two countries has already been eliminated, or is Pashinyan
maneuvering with Moscow on the eve of early parliamentary elections,
which he wants to lead temporarily?
- In reality, it was inevitable that Pashinyan would be in a tense
state at the meeting.
-His forced release of Robert Kocharyan and suspension of the CSTO
Secretary General's persecution testifies that he is preparing for a
visit to Moscow with a relaxed position. Neither the Russian press,
nor the Armenian media either wrote that either Pashinyan had shown
some kind of tough stance in the negotiations with Putin. Pashinyan's
only message was: "Do not interfere in the internal affairs of
Armenia." And this is a normal call, and any head of state makes such
statements when there is interference in his state. Therefore, this
meeting did not change anything. At this meeting, there was no trace
of aggressive anti-Russian statements that sounded inside Armenia.
- Azerbaijan expected the results of this meeting because of the
Karabakh conflict. When Russia's relations with Pashinyan's government
cooled, Moscow made statements that met the interests of Azerbaijan.
The ideas of the return of the occupied lands were often heard. Moscow
and Yerevan reconciled, does it mean that such talks will decrease?
- The talks that Azerbaijan expected something special from this
meeting were an invention of our press. The leadership of Azerbaijan
did not expect anything new from this meeting. Our press wrote that
Putin allegedly will discuss with Pashinyan the issue of Azerbaijan's
joining the CSTO. However, Azerbaijani officials did not say anything
like that. Moreover, during his visit to Croatia, the President
(Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev) announced Azerbaijan's intention to expand
cooperation with NATO. As for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, nothing
new has been discussed either. If it was discussed, but nothing
significant.
Because of Putin's lack of a plan proposing something new to resolve
the conflict, it is not clear that he could discuss with Armenia in
this direction. The maximum that he could offer is to come to a common
compromise, agreement in negotiations with Azerbaijan. For Putin, the
main thing is that the parties do not lose the potential for
negotiations, they do not go to confrontation, they would not
undermine the stable period of the South Caucasus policy of Russia.
- In early September, the Presidents of Azerbaijan and Russia met in
Sochi. Then Putin and Pashinyan met. At the end of September, Putin's
visit to Azerbaijan is planned. Although the content of the
negotiations behind closed doors is not known, it is clear that the
Karabakh issue is mainly discussed. However, we do not know what
exactly is being discussed. Maybe you will share your assumptions.
What do these intensifying meetings and talks say? What can be the
results of this?
- The main interest of the Azerbaijani side in expanding relations
with Russia is its assistance in the resolution of the Karabakh
conflict. In no other issue Azerbaijan needs intervention and support
from Russia. On the contrary, Moscow has the ability to create
obstacles in all ambitious projects of Azerbaijan. Therefore, the
country's leadership is doing everything possible to remove obstacles
to the Russian Federation. I believe that at all meetings the
Azerbaijani side raises the question of Russia's influence on Armenia
in the resolution of the Karabakh conflict.
Taking into account Russia"s ability to interfere in the internal
affairs of the former Soviet republics, it has a lever of interference
in the political processes of Azerbaijan. Moscow has always had the
opportunity to threaten Baku with the deportation of Azerbaijanis.
However, Azerbaijan managed to prevent this every time.
- By the way, for a long time the issue of Azerbaijan's membership in
the CSTO is being discussed. Is it possible to discuss this issue with
the leadership of Azerbaijan and Armenia?
- It became known from Pashinyan's statement made during the trip to
Tavush region that he did not discuss this issue with Putin. At the
same time, Ilham Aliyev's statement in Croatia on improving relations
with NATO shows that talks about the possible membership of Azerbaijan
in NATO do not correspond to reality. I have not heard serious
comments from the Azerbaijani officials on this matter.
- In general, what can you say about the processes taking place in the
region? What is Russia going to do now?
- The processes taking place in the region show that competition
between Russia and Europe is continuing to increase its influence in
the region. Russia has a powerful base of influence in the region.
Europe is increasingly showing interest in maintaining control over
political processes in the region. The example of Georgia shows that
Europe strives to integrate this region according to its standards.
Because Russia has no integration potential, the political potential
and potential of civil society in Europe will grow in the region.
Russia will always try to use methods of threats and pressure, which
has no prospects. -0-

Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijani Opposition Press
 Monday
What could be expected in response to the praise of the CSTO?
Analytical Service Turan
In mid-August, Chairman of the Committee on Legal Policy and State
Building of the Milli Majlis of Azerbaijan, Ali Huseynli, spoke about
the advantages of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO)
of the CIS. The public regarded the opinion of A. Huseynli as "the
first step of Azerbaijan intending to join the CSTO". Although, the
public reaction Huseynli"s words was negative, his proposal caused
only questions in people's minds, as Armenia, one of the six members
of the CSTO, for many years has been occupying 20% of the territory of
Azerbaijan. On the other hand, in terms of ensuring its own security,
Armenia relies most on the CSTO and its locomotive - Russia.
It is not known, if Huseynli, speaking about the merits of the CSTO,
took into account the "factor of Armenia" (which, basically, was
caused by the reaction of the Azerbaijani society to his statements.)
However, the member of the Azerbaijani parliament did not make him
wait long for his speech, Armenia reminded herself.
In an interview with "Kommersant" (September 10), Prime Minister Nikol
Pashinyan, who visited Russia three times since he seized power in
May, finally clarified the issue of the CSTO from the position of his
country.
Answering the question from the correspondent of the newspaper
Vladimir Solovyov, "... there are talks about the establishment in the
CSTO of the status of "observer country" and "cooperating country". If
Azerbaijan claims these statuses, what will be the position of
Armenia?" Prime Minister Pashinyan replied: "Probably everyone knows
that without the consent of Armenia such decisions cannot be accepted.
All of you know about the relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan
today. Every day we hear threats against Armenia from Azerbaijan. In
my opinion, Armenia's clear position on this issue is conditioned by
this".
The Prime Minister stressed that if Azerbaijan wants to achieve CSTO
membership, "first of all, it should establish relations with
Armenia."
According to Nikolai Vovaevich, Azerbaijan, expecting deterioration of
relations between Armenia and Russia, hoped, using this, to start
"provocative actions". He expressed confidence that this policy of
Azerbaijan has not yielded results.
However, Azerbaijan's concern may be caused more by Pashinyan's
attempt to present Nagorno-Karabakh as a separate state, than the
question of membership in the CSTO, touched on by the Prime Minister
of Armenia.
"They have their own power, their government, their president," said
Pashinyan, trying to transfer Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent
subject to the discussion center. Can his words be considered a
response to the Azerbaijani MP singing praises the CSTO?
In other words, can official Baku, thinking about the CSTO, be put
before the demand to "recognize Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent
subject"? In addition, N. Pashinyan refers to the joint statement of
the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair countries. Allegedly, they said that the
issue of the final status of Nagorno-Karabakh "must be resolved by the
will of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh."
The interview of the Armenian Prime Minister with the "Kommersant"
newspaper can again update the issue of the CSTO, which has not been
discussed for two weeks: has Azerbaijan benefited so much from
praising the CSTO by Huseynli, or ...?

Interfax - Russia & CIS Military Newswire
 Monday 6:51 PM MSK
Armenia to send doctors, sappers to Aleppo
YEREVAN. Sept 10
Armenia is planning to send military medics, engineers, mine clearance
experts to Syria to provide assistance to Aleppo residents, Armenian
Deputy Defense Minister Gabriel Balayan said.
"Those are doctors, engineers, mine clearance experts, people of a
humanitarian occupation, who will help Aleppo residents, mainly its
Armenian community. On the basis of a request of the Syrian
government, we will send experts, who would try to provide assistance
to civilians by means of their knowledge, in addition to humanitarian
aid we are sending," Balayan told Armenia's Radio Liberty.
The group, which is to be sent, will not be a member of any coalition, he said.
"It is exclusively Armenia's assistance. The group is being sent as
part of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2254 of 2015
and an intergovernmental agreement on cooperation with Syria. That is
a result of the Armenian-Syrian agreement. The group will be
subordinate to a relevant Armenian agency. But we also do not rule out
certain cooperation with Russia or other parties, if the need should
arise in the process," Balayan said.
The deadline of the sending and the duration of the work have not been
definitively determined, because talks are still ongoing, the deputy
minister said.