Sports: Situation around Henrikh Mkhitaryan remains complex, Azerbaijani commentator admits

Panorama, Armenia
Sept 29 2018
Sport 13:39 29/09/2018

Arsenal are due to travel to Baku on October 4 for a EUFA Europa League group stage tie against Azerbaijani champions Qarabag. It is still unclear whether Armenian national team captain and Arsenal midfielder Henrikh Mkhitaryan will travel Baku amid the ban to enter Azerbaijan and out of out of security concerns. 

Commentator at Russian Match TV Channel Elvin Qerimov has spoken about the topic, sport 24.ru reports.

“The situation around Mkhitaryan is complex. No athlete should ever face similar situation. The Europa League final will also be played in Baku and it is important to solve the matter to the benefit of football not politics. Sport unites people, helps to interact, get friends which may lead to reconciliation and not to the opposite,” Qerimov said. 

Azerbaijani Press: Azerbaijan and Armenia in the conditions of war

Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijani Opposition Press
Friday
Azerbaijan and Armenia in the conditions of war
 
by  Analytical Service Turan
 
 
For the first time Armenia, carrying out maneuvers, started them with the declaration of the conditional war by the country’s parliament. In its turn, Azerbaijan for the first time declared that the aim of the September maneuvers is the defeat of the military units of Armenia occupying the Azerbaijani territory.
 
Both sides reported on the successful completion of all the goals and tasks set in the planning of maneuvers. Armenia declared defeat in the course of maneuvers of Azerbaijani armed formations, and Azerbaijan, accordingly, defeated the Armenian. During the maneuvers both sides stated that the firing was combat.
 
The President of Turkey R. Erdogan attended the military parade, held in honor of the 100th anniversary of the liberation of Baku from the Bolshevik-Armenian occupiers by the joint Turkish-Azerbaijani forces held on September 15, 2018. The Turkish leader said that the brotherhood of Turkey and Azerbaijan is inviolable, and that “there can be no talk of opening the Turkish-Armenian border until the Karabakh conflict is resolved fairly …”
 
Military maneuvers and preparations for the conflicting parties were accompanied by a previously unpredictable verbal duel launched by the new leader of Armenia, Pashinyan, who, apparently, still continues to be dominated by revolutionary euphoria.
 
Immediately upon coming to power, Pashinyan said:
 
– that he refuses negotiations, which lead to nothing;
 
– that Karabakh should participate in the negotiation process;
 
– that Armenia will defeat Azerbaijan, because now it is completely different – a rallied country that the entire world Armenian Diaspora will actively support,
 
– that it is high time, without hesitation, to annex Karabakh to Armenia.
 
The response of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev did not take long:
 
“The war is not over yet”
 
“Very soon, the Azerbaijani flag will be over Karabakh” and,
 
“It would have been better if Pashinyan calms down and sit down, or he would get such an answer that he will not find himself a little.”
 
Further, both leaders sent their sons to active service in the army – an event unprecedented for these countries, where the elite had previously tried to liberate their offspring from military conscription.
 
On the wave of growth in oil revenues in 2018, Azerbaijan launched a new program to rearm its army. On September 18 at a meeting with residents of the region of Bilasuvar, I.Aliyev said: “We will continue to strengthen our army, we will allocate more funds to the army, and in every possible way we will strengthen its defense capability.”
 
It is interesting that unlike past small and large crises, international mediators did not indicate their attitude to the current aggravation played by Armenian and Azerbaijani staff officers. The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs hardly reacted to the provocative actions of the parties in order to stop the escalation of tension.
 
In this regard, it is worth noting the visit of the Israeli Defense Minister (September 13-18), which spent five days in Baku, negotiating with the President and the Minister of Defense of Azerbaijan to expand military cooperation between the countries, including the sale of Israeli high-tech weapons to Azerbaijan. According to detaly.co.il “in 2017, the volume of Israeli arms exports reached 9.1 billion dollars. 13% of the Israeli arms exports come from Azerbaijan. “
 
On September 27, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited Azerbaijan, who continued the line of the Sochi visit of President Aliyev to the expansion of the Russian-Azerbaijani trade and economic cooperation for the next six years. Publicly nothing was said about the military aspect of cooperation. But it should be noted that Putin’s visit came at the defense exhibition in Baku, where Russian developers and manufacturers lobbied for their weapons, and he could not but discuss the prospects for further deliveries of the Russian arms.
 
All these maneuvers, parades, verbal duels and visits of foreign leaders to the region may seem to observers a harbinger of some large-scale events in the conflict zone. Of the recent statements of Yerevan and Baku, it is also clear that the conflicting parties believe that they are both psychologically and financially ready for a big war to a victorious end. But how much is such a war possible? Armenia does not want a large-scale war, it is pleased with the current status quo quite. Russia does not want such a war, because its current status quo, in which both conflicting countries are dependent on Russian support, is quite satisfactory.
 
The West is also not a supporter of such a war, because it could harm multibillion-dollar investments invested in the extraction and transportation of Caspian energy resources and other existing and promising projects. The “war of liberation” is desired only for Azerbaijan, but even at the stage of preparation for a major war, Baku will most likely face an influential world “peacekeeping” alliance.
 
Such a war can be effective for Azerbaijan in the event of a weakening of the “peacekeeping” alliance, which can happen, while satisfying the interests of countries or alliances – moderators of the conflict. The latter are stepping up activity in the Azerbaijani field, where deals continue around oil and gas, militaristic and other billion projects, which, with the correct redistribution, can become an advantage of Baku and its security umbrella.
 
Armenian military games with the designation of real, not conditional, enemy will remain head quarters in such a situation, and the status of “neither war, nor peace” in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict can begin to crumble. Azerbaijan is unlikely to give up creating a constant tension on the contact line with the enemy, in order not to let Armenia feel at ease. Armenian soldiers will perish from mines and snipers in foreign territory. Such a status quo, as the economic, demographic degradation of Armenia and its regional isolation show, will not be easy for the Armenian society to sustain.
 

Book: Art history professor Christina Maranci to speak on Armenian art, new book

Tafts Daily
Sept 28 2018
  • BY SETENAY MUFTI AND STEPHANIE HOECHST
  • •   SEPTEMBER 28, 2018

    Christina Maranci will give a lecture on her recently published book, “The Art of Armenia: An Introduction,” on Oct. 4, in which she will discuss the meaning and content of her book, as well as her own academic and creative processes. Maranci serves as chair of Tufts’ Art History department, as well as the Arthur H. Dadian and Ara T. Oztemel Professor of Armenian Art and Architecture. The talk is co-sponsored by the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR), the Tufts Armenian Club and the Darakjian Jafarian Chair in Armenian History at Tufts. “The Art of Armenia,” Maranci’s fourth book to date, seems to have been a long time coming.

    As Maranci explains, the book is not intended to provide a comprehensive study of Armenian art but rather to give a solid overview of the region’s complicated cultural and artistic history.

    “My book is a general study of Armenian art from the Paleolithic period to the early 18th century, [including] all media [and] all regions of historical Armenia,” Maranci told the Daily in an email.

    This includes a range of artifacts, from Armenia’s famed illuminated manuscripts from the Middle Ages to the oldest shoe ever discovered.

    Creating an accessible guide to Armenian art presents a more significant challenge than many, including even some art historians, might think. Historically, Armenian territory has included large swaths of the Middle East and Caucasus regions. As a result, Armenian culture has adopted and appropriated elements of many other civilizations and empires, ranging from Urartu to Rome to Persia, and has become even more complex after the nationwide conversion to Christianity in the late third or early fourth century AD. After the Sassanian Period, Armenia became part of the Umayyad Caliphate, as well as the Byzantine Empire. It was partially conquered by the Ottoman Empire in the 16th century, and Western Armenia remained under Ottoman control until the mass killings and deportations of the Armenian Genocide in 1915 — a label still rejected by Turkey and not recognized by the United States.

    “The Art of Armenia” attempts to outline all of these cultural elements in a comprehensive way. As a result of its diverse history, the historical aesthetic of Armenian art is multi-faceted and often inconsistent. This may explain why so many art historians tend to overlook the significance of Armenia, according to Maranci. It is not that Armenia is an obscure, empty country; on the contrary, it is fascinating and rich to the point of inconvenience for anyone trying to construct a clear narrative of its artistic tradition. The lack of thorough yet accessible books about Armenian art history compelled Maranci to develop one.

    “I wrote it because I needed a good text to assign to my students,” Maranci said. “Available literature was either outdated or at the wrong level.”

    Maranci specified that although a great body of work has been written about Armenian art, much of it is dense, specialized and in languages like Armenian, Russian and French. This makes these sources inaccessible to many people seeking an introduction to Armenian art. For this reason, Maranci has also made the effort to cite mostly English and French-language sources in the bibliography of “The Art of Armenia.”

    Not only is the book useful for art history students and professors who want to consider Armenia as a case study at the crossroads of cultures, it also gives Armenians to appreciate their own heritage, according to Maranci, who is Armenian herself and was galvanized by the Armenian community’s need for self-appreciation.

    This personal connection manifests itself in Maranci’s sense of urgency against the cultural destruction of Armenian art, particularly that of churches standing in the historical Armenian state, whose borders have included parts of modern-day Turkey, Azerbaijan, Iran and Georgia. Maranci’s interest in the preservation of these churches began in 2013, when she visited the Cathedral of Mren in Turkey. After studying and exploring the cathedral from afar, she arrived in Turkey to find it semi-collapsed and in a state of ruin. In 2015, the World Monuments Fund and the U.S. Department of State’s Ambassadors Fund for Cultural Preservation used three-dimensional scanning and extensive documentation to prepare an emergency conservation plan.

    Although Maranci is not a conservator, she and other scholars have attempted to gain access to sites like the Mren Cathedral for research purposes, only to be blocked or even apprehended by the Turkish government. Mren is in a militarized zone, which is partially responsible for its inaccessibility to foreign researchers. Moreover, the cathedral has been left to crumble for hundreds of years quite intentionally. For this reason, Maranci’s book includes a postscript on issues of cultural memory and heritage, particularly in light of the Genocide of 1915–1922.”

    Artifacts from around the world are currently locked in transnational debates over their repatriation and right to cultural heritage. It seems that political and geographical struggles for power are as relevant to Armenia today as they were in antiquity.

    Despite the plethora of challenges for those interested in studying Armenian art, it seems to be gaining appreciation in the United States, including at Tufts. The Metropolitan Museum of Art debuted its “Armenia!” exhibit on Sept. 22, describing it as “the first major exhibition to explore the remarkable artistic and cultural achievements of the Armenian people in a global context over fourteen centuries.” In Boston this month, the South End’s Galatea Fine Art has hosted an exhibit called “Resiliency and Resistance,” which showcases the contemporary artwork of four Armenian women. At Tufts, Maranci’s course “Armenian Art, Architecture & Politics” has gone from a novelty of the art history department to a popular class in its own right; the course’s enrollment this fall is among its highest to date.

    Maranci’s lecture on Oct. 4 is an exciting opportunity for her to showcase her book and its journey, which she has described as a labor of love.

    “So much of book-writing is solitary, and this will give me a chance to talk about the problems of writing, the revelations of writing it and [to] give people an inside peek into the book,” Maranci said.

    She hopes to communicate “how astonishing Armenian art is,” while highlighting the tragedy of its exclusion from Western art history.

    “The Art of Armenia: An Illustrated Lecture by Dr. Christina Maranci” will be on Oct. 4 at 7:30 p.m. in Alumnae Lounge. The event is free and open to the public.

Azerbaijani Press: MG Co-Chairs about results of their meeting with the FM of Armenia and Azerbaijan

Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijani Opposition Press
MG Co-Chairs about results of their meeting with the FM of Armenia and Azerbaijan


New York/28.09.18/Turan: The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group (Igor Popov of the Russian Federation, Stephane Visconti of France, and Andrew Schofer of the United States of America) met separately and jointly with the Foreign Minister of Armenia, Zohrab Mnatsakanyan, and the Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan, Elmar Mammadyarov, between 25 and 27 September on the margins of the UN General Assembly.

The Co-Chairs were joined in their meetings by the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office, Andrzej Kasprzyk. They also met with the OSCE Secretary General, UN Under-Secretary General for Political Affairs, and a representative of the Italian OSCE Chairmanship.

The Ministers continued negotiations on the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The Co-Chairs and the Ministers discussed the situation in the region and sought clarification with respect to several recent statements and incidents of concern. The Co-Chairs expressed deep regret over the continuing and unnecessary loss of life. They cautioned the Ministers about the dangers of escalation, called on the parties to engage constructively in a positive atmosphere, and to avoid inflammatory rhetoric. The Co-Chairs underscored that a comprehensive settlement will require compromises on all sides.

In this context, the Ministers confirmed the importance of taking measures to intensify the negotiation process and to take additional steps to reduce tensions. The Ministers agreed to meet again before the end of the year.

The Co-Chairs plan to visit the region in the near future and will then brief the OSCE Minsk Group and the Permanent Council on the status of negotiations, reads a press release of the OSCE Minsk Group. -02D-

Azerbaijani Press: N.Pashinyan Disclosed Content of Meeting with I.Aliyev

Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijani Opposition Press
N.Pashinyan Disclosed Content of Meeting with I.Aliyev

Baku / 28.09.18 / Turan: Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev discussed three points in the bilateral relations of the neighboring countries. As reported by Sputnik-Armenia, Pashinyan said this during a live broadcast on the Facebook social network.

According to him, despite the fact that Russian President Vladimir Putin introduced them during the World Football Championship, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan did not manage to talk in Moscow at that time.

“The heads of the Ministry of Defense of Armenia and Azerbaijan must agree to prevent incidents on the border,” Pashinyan said.

The head of the Armenian government noted that immediately after the meeting Bako Sahakyan (the head of the separatist regime in Nagorno-Karabakh) was informed about this agreement. According to him, it is necessary to prevent any incidents on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border and in the zone of the Karabakh conflict.

“This night, for the first time in four months, not a single incident was recorded at the border, it was the first quiet night during my premiership,” Pashinyan stressed.

The second point the Armenian Prime Minister and the Azerbaijani President agreed was to be committed to dialogue and negotiations. Both stressed the importance of a peaceful resolution of the Karabakh issue.

“The third important decision to which we have come was the organization of an operative communication between us. We will assign it to the relevant bodies in our countries,” Pashinyan said.

According to him, it is very important to have such a connection in order to preserve the stability of the cease-fire regime.

At the same time, the Premier noted that there were no substantive negotiations, despite the fact that the leaders of the two countries communicated on the evening of September 27 and on September 28.

“The main problem for us was the prevention of violations of the ceasefire … There was no discussion of the content; at this stage only the reduction of tension was discussed. If we are talking about a settlement, it is clear that an appropriate atmosphere is needed. It is illogical to talk about a settlement when shooting … Honestly saying, I am glad that we were able to agree with him,” Pashinyan stressed.

Previously, Pashinyan insisted on the connection of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh to the negotiation process. However, this was rejected by Baku, and was not supported by international mediators. Now, judging by the position voiced by Pashinyan, Yerevan is ready to continue negotiations in the already formed format.

Official Baku has not yet commented on the meeting of the leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia in Dushanbe. -06D–

Louisette Texier Survived the Armenian Genocide to Become a Pioneering Rally Driver

Jalopnik
Sept 29 2018
 
 
Louisette Texier Survived the Armenian Genocide to Become a Pioneering Rally Driver
 
Elizabeth Werth
Photo: Louisette Texier Archive

In 1915, Louisette Texier’s father was hanged by the Turks in the midst of a large-scale extermination of Armenians. Lost, afraid, with seemingly no options left to her, Texier’s mother placed both of her daughters in an orphanage in Istanbul. When she returned to reclaim her daughters, she found they’d been separated and evacuated. Louisette was sent to Marseille, never destined to see her family or homeland again.

The young girl was never adopted. She stayed in the system until she aged out, sent to a boarding school in the suburbs of Paris. But at age 15, already a rebel, Texier snuck out of school to become a cabaret dancer.

Texier was determined to live a life full of independence. According to Fast Ladies by Jean François Bouzanquet, Texier saved up enough money in the world of dancing to open her own line of ready-to-wear clothing boutiques in Neuilly, a suburb of Paris, where she was among one of the first people to actually market jeans for women.

As with many of the aspiring drivers in France, Texier’s racing career started at the banked track of Montlhéry. In the mid-1950s, women still weren’t the primary owners of vehicles—but Mdme. Texier, with a successful business and big dreams, was one of the rare ones who did. A friend named Georges Houel asked her to drive him out to Montlhéry to watch a friend race.

It was there that Texier met the famous Jean Behra. So infatuated was he with rallying that he waxed poetic about it to the impressionable youngsters who had come out to the track that day. Something about his words struck a chord with Texier. A few months later, she teamed up with Germaine Rouault to compete in the Monte Carlo rally. It wasn’t a stunning outing, given the fact that Texier was showing up with next to no experience. Out of 223 finishers, Texier and Rouault ended up in 119th place.

Advertisement

But it was the beginning of the rest of her life. The experience thrilled Texier, her heart brimming with the excitement of competition. She bought an Alfa TI and started entering whatever competition she could manage—the only vacations she would take from running her business.

Alongside Anne Soisbault, Texier won the 1960 Lyons-Charbonnières rally. Behind the wheel of Jaguar MK2, she won the 1964 Tourisme du Tour Auto Ladies’ Cup. She and Soisbault made quite the team; both were as capable of driving as they were of navigating, and they’d often swap roles.

The hardships of her early life hardened Texier right from the start, earning herself the nicknames “Bulldozer” and “Le Louisette” (a cheeky reference to the guillotine). At Charbonnièrres, Texier smashed her windshield just in time for a pouring rain to start battering the field. Despite that, she powered through nearly 500 miles to finish third overall in race conditions that even the veteran drivers found near impossible.

Advertisement

Being a woman in the rally world wasn’t easy. Some of her male competitors were known to fill the trunk of her car with heavy baggage when she wasn’t paying attention in an attempt to gain the upper hand on a woman who proved next to impossible to dishearten.

One of her final rallies was the Tour d’Europe alongside Lise Renaud. Knowing that it was one of the most difficult rallies one could compete in, the two women made it their express mission to make it to get to checkpoints ahead of everyone else—if only just to touch up their makeup and hair to look as composed and relaxed as possible when the haggard, fatigued men started clocking in.

Louisette never really stopped racing. She just took a break from competing. She found success in her business and began to build a family (although she did divorce her husband, claiming that she preferred to live her life to the fullest and had gotten tired of men trying to control her). Texier is still alive at 105 years old and, despite needing a walker to get around, she still doesn’t hesitate to hop in a go-kart and challenge her grandchildren (and great-grandchildren) to a race. Hell, she was even taking off to Africa at the spry age of 80 for a chance to get behind the wheel in unfamiliar territory.

Texier was a stunning driver in her day, someone with a dazzling personality and the rare ability to balance a successful business and a successful racing career during her prime. This series has covered plenty of women whose careers were cut short by outside forces—war, economic depression, you name it—and it’s refreshing to find a woman who was not only able to overcome the hardships she endured in her own life but was able to turn that into success all across the board.

Armenian Defense Ministry holds board meeting

The Armenian Defense Ministry held a board meeting on Friday, during which the development of the Armed Forces of the Republic was discussed.

According to Defense Ministry press service, within cooperation of the Armed Forces of the two Armenian states, the meeting was attended by the representatives of the Defense Ministry’s command.

Before proceeding to the agenda of the meeting, Defense Minister David Tonoyan congratulated the officers who were awarded on Independence Day.

Armenia-Azerbaijan: 1.5-2.5 – first defeat of our team

Today, the most enthusiastic and tense meeting was held at the World Chess Olympiad. In the 5th round of the men’s team of Armenia, the three-time winner of the Olympiad, met with Azerbaijan, which has never been a winner.

Levon Aronian defeated Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, and Hrant Melkumyan won Arkady Naydish.

Gabriel Sargisyan and Hayk Martirosyan played with black pieces, respectively, with Teimour Radjabov and Rauf Mamedov.

Martirosyan ended the game with a drew, and Gabriel Sargsyan lost.

Thus, our team lost to Azerbaijan with the score of 1.5:2.5.

Mother learns about pregnancy minutes before birth (video)

Grigoryan’s 7th baby was born in Gyumri maternity hospital with a weight of 2 kg 900 g and 50 cm in height.

As the baby’s mother mentioned, she learned about the baby during the 9th month of the pregnancy, when she was taken to the hospital for an abdominal pain in an ambulance car and gave birth after some minutes.

Although the baby was unexpected, he already is a loved child for parents and family. So, the family will live with 9 children in a single-room apartment. Shirak governor Karen Sarukhanyan also visited the newborn.

He also congratulated everyone, underlining that the Armenian army was enriched with another soldier.

More information is in “Tsayg” TV footage.

Armenian, Azerbaijani FMs agree to meet once again before the end of year

Categories
Artsakh
Region

The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group (Igor Popov of the Russian Federation, Stephane Visconti of France, and Andrew Schofer of the United States of America) met separately and jointly with the Foreign Minister of Armenia, Zohrab Mnatsakanyan, and the Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan, Elmar Mammadyarov, between 25 and 27 September on the margins of the UN General Assembly,  the press service of the OSCE informed. The Co-Chairs were joined in their meetings by the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office, Andrzej Kasprzyk. They also met with the OSCE Secretary General, UN Under-Secretary General for Political Affairs, and a representative of the Italian OSCE Chairmanship.

The Ministers continued negotiations on the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The Co-Chairs and the Ministers discussed the situation in the region and sought clarification with respect to several recent statements and incidents of concern. The Co-Chairs expressed deep regret over the continuing and unnecessary loss of life. They cautioned the Ministers about the dangers of escalation, called on the parties to engage constructively in a positive atmosphere, and to avoid inflammatory rhetoric. The Co-Chairs underscored that a comprehensive settlement will require compromises on all sides.

In this context, the Ministers confirmed the importance of taking measures to intensify the negotiation process and to take additional steps to reduce tensions. The Ministers agreed to meet again before the end of the year.

The Co-Chairs plan to visit the region in the near future and will then brief the OSCE Minsk Group and the Permanent Council on the status of negotiations.