Egyptian-Armenian artist Chant Avedissian dies at 67

The National, UAE
Oct 28 2018

Avedissian’s work celebrated pop and folk culture

Chant Avedissian’s ‘You Are Love’ (2008), of Egyptian diva Umm Kulthum. Courtesy Barjeel Art Foundation

Egyptian-Armenian artist Chant Avedissian has died in Cairo at the age of 67. In a statement, his family said he died of lung cancer.

Avedissian’s work engaged with the glories of past Egypt, from Pharaonic hieroglyphs to more recent demigods such as the beloved singer Umm Kulthum. He would print iconic images of these figures against stencilled backgrounds drawn from Ottoman, Bedouin, and traditional Islamic motifs, in a mix of pop culture and folklore
.

Avedissian was born in Cairo in 1951 to Armenian parents, and the relationship between national identity and cultural interest remained of paramount interest throughout his life. His focus was on Egypt’s golden age – that of the Pharaoh’s as well as Gamal Abdel Nasser’s revival of that past – and the wider Arab region: his pantheon of Egyptian figures was quite literally set against patterns from along the Silk Route.
Drawn carefully as the backgrounds to images of well-known Egyptian figures such as Abdel Halim Hafez, Abdel Nasser, Farid Al Atrash and Faten Hamama were motifs from Ottoman textiles from the 15th and 16th centuries, Uzbeiki kaftans, the Abdulaziz Khan Madrassah in Bukhara, wooden Mamluk doors, and Upper Egyptian Bedouin kilims.

Chant Avedissian’s ‘Gamal Abd El Nasser’ from 2008. Courtesy of Barjeel Art Foundation

Avedissian’s fluency with both fine and applied arts was also a factor of his education: he studied fine art in Montreal, Canada and then print-making in Paris at the Ecole nationale superieure des arts decoratifs. This more formal training was altered by his experiences upon his return to Egypt in 1980, when he worked at the Aga Khan Foundation with the architect Hassan Fathy, known as Egypt’s architect of the poor. Fathy had revived traditional Islamic and Egyptian techniques, and introduced Avedissian to local materials. Back then, the young artist began dying textiles according to the Bedouin fashion, and – saying he felt freed by moving away from European classicism – incorporating everyday materials such as corrugated cardboard and Arabic gum into his works.

The Gulf War in 1991 marked a watershed moment for Avedissian, even though the fighting did not spread to Egypt as he feared. He began making works that emphasised memory and cultural history in greater depth. His masterpiece, Icons of the Nile, which he worked on from 1991 until 2004, is a large-scale installation of 120 patterned
drawings arrayed in a grid. Again, here are the big-name figures from Egyptian popular culture and political life, but also images from daily life: typical Egyptian families and historical elements, such as the Egyptian-made Nefertiti sewing machines that were part of Nasser’s promise to create an entirely self-sufficient Egyptian economy. As the critic Kaelen Wilson-Goldie wrote about the mass-media emblems, in a review of the work in The National when it was shown in Beirut in 2010: “This is not straightforward replication, but a sustained rumination on the circulation of images, and the various purposes they serve.” Avedissian’s work, trafficking both in pop culture and folkloric traditions, challenged the separation between the two: both are imagery belonging to the people, and travelling among them, whether among nomads or on newspapers and televisions.

Avedissian’s later years continued his exploration of traditional patterns
, often dotted with Egyptian emblems such as the crocodile or the donkey
, a symbol for the ancient Egyptian god of the afterlife. These appear in his work in bright vinyl stickers – emblematic, too, of his light touch and willingness to work across materials low and high.

In the UAE, Avedissian’s work is in the collection of Guggenheim Abu Dhabi
and Barjeel Art Foundation. It is also held by the US’s National Museum of African Art, the British Museum in London, and the National Gallery of Jordan.

Newborn twins’ mother realized she made wrong decision by leaving them outside Gyumri orphanage

News.am, Armenia
Oct 28 2018
Newborn twins’ mother realized she made wrong decision by leaving them outside Gyumri orphanage Newborn twins’ mother realized she made wrong decision by leaving them outside Gyumri orphanage

19:39, 28.10.2018
                  

YEREVAN. – The Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs of Armenia has disseminated new information regarding the newborn twin boys who were found at the courtyard of an orphanage in Gyumri.

The mother of these twins on Saturday went to a police station and the said orphanage, the ministry informed on Facebook.

Subsequently, it became clear that she truly wishes to raise them herself.

The mother of these babies realized that she had made a wrong decision based on her social conditions, and she admitted that she does not picture her future without her “little ones.”

As reported earlier, the twin boys were found at the courtyard of the said orphanage, and inside a plastic bag.

The biological mother of these babies was found sometime thereafter. According to police, she is an 18-year-old resident of Ararat Province.

The mother of these newborn twins had refused to care for her babies.

Armenia has no need in buying US weapons, says defense minister

TASS, Russia
Oct 28 2018
World

October 28, 16:17 UTC+3 YEREVAN

             

YEREVAN, October 28. /TASS/. Armenian Defense Minister David Tonoyan said on Sunday his country has no need in buying US-made weapons.

“We didn’t discuss a matter of buying American weapons,” he said in an interview with the News.am agency following his meeting with visiting US National Security Adviser John Bolton.

Tonoyan noted that the weapons market is open and Armenia has no need in buying American weapons at this point.

Armenian acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said earlier that the cabinet was ready to look at the issue of buying US-made weapons in case it received “an attractive offer from the American side.”

Meanwhile, Bolton said on October 25 that US weapons were better in terms of quality than Russian armaments and hinted at a possibility to sell them to the Armenian side.

Now, Armenia buys most of its weapons from Russia.

Armenia MOD on buying American weapons: There is no need for it at this point

News.am, Armenia
Oct 28 2018
Armenia MOD on buying American weapons: There is no need for it at this point Armenia MOD on buying American weapons: There is no need for it at this point

17:14, 28.10.2018
                  

YEREVAN. – Acting Defense Minister Davit Tonoyan discussed security issues with US National Security Adviser John Bolton, who paid a visit to Armenia on Thursday.

Tonoyan told about the aforementioned to Armenian News-NEWS.am. He added, however, that military cooperation was not discussed.

Asked whether the chances of selling American weapons to Armenia were conferred on with Bolton, the minister said the arms market is an open market. “[But] we didn’t discuss a matter of buying American weapons,” he added.

And asked whether Armenia would purchase Americans weapons if it were made such an offer, Davit Tonoyan said there was no need for it at this point.

The minister noted that sending an Armenian humanitarian division to Syria also was talked about with John Bolton, and added that this division will be sent.

Map of Armenia displayed in Germany causes ruckus in Turkish media

News.am, Armenia
Oct 28 2018
Map of Armenia displayed in Germany causes ruckus in Turkish media Map of Armenia displayed in Germany causes ruckus in Turkish media

10:54, 27.10.2018
                  

A map of Armenia displayed at a community event in Germany caused a stir in the Turkish media.

The map of ancient Armenia with boundaries covering Cilicia and Western Armenia was presented during the event. This map also covered the territory of the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

Azerbaijani Press: The John Batchelor Show highlights Azerbaijan`s achievements

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
Oct 28 2018
The John Batchelor Show highlights Azerbaijan`s achievements

Baku, October 28, AZERTAC

Popular American radio program “The John Batchelor Show” has interviewed Deputy Head of the Foreign Policy Affairs Department of the Azerbaijani Presidential Administration Hikmat Hajiyev who spoke about the visit of the US National Security Adviser John Bolton to Azerbaijan, Armenia’s occupation against Azerbaijan, the settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, 6th Baku International Humanitarian Forum, and Azerbaijan’s achievements gained during the years of independency.

Hajiyev highlighted the country’s energy policy, regional cooperation and its relations with neighbors. He emphasized that Bolton’s visit to Azerbaijan opens up new opportunities for bilateral cooperation in a number of areas, including energy, security and fight against terrorism.

Hajiyev noted Azerbaijan`s geopolitical and strategic importance as well as energy projects initiated by the country.

He described Armenia’s ongoing aggression against Azerbaijan as the main threat to regional security. Hajiyev said the withdrawal of the Armenian troops from Azerbaijan`s occupied lands is an essential precondition for the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Mentioning Azerbaijan’s achievements made in the years of independence, Hajiyev drew the audience’s attention to the 6th Baku International Humanitarian Forum held on October 25-26. He described the forum as an important global platform for discussing humanitarian issues at the international level. He emphasized that Azerbaijan is rapidly developing and is a modern, secular state which is proud of its multiculturalism traditions.

The John Batchelor Show is a popular American breaking-news program which is focused on current international, military, political and economic topics. The program is widely broadcast by numerous radio channels, both live and as podcasts in various states and cities that are covered by the ABC Radio network in the US.

The program is broadcast all days of the week and enjoys millions of listeners in the US.

Armenia remembers victims of 1999 parliament attack

JAM News
Oct 28 2018

An armed group of individuals forced their way into the National Assembly of Armenia on 27 October 1999 and shot the speaker, PM and MPs

Acting Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan and other officials laid down flowers yesterday at the memorial dedicated to the victims of an attack on parliament which took place on 27 October 1999. The politicians were joined by relatives of MPs who died in the attack.

An armed group forced their way into the National Assembly of Armenia 19 years ago on 27 October 1999. The group said they were carrying out a coup d’état and demanded that MPs turn off their cell phones and lie down on the floor.

The group was led by a man named Nairi Hunanyan. The journalists who were present in the National Assembly later reported that Hunanyan approached then-Prime Minister of Armenia, Vazgen Sargsyan, and said the following phrase: “Stop drinking our blood.” Sargsyan replied: “Everything that is being done is for you and your children.” Hunanyan responded by opening fire and killing Sargsyan.

Seven other people were killed that day, including parliamentary speaker Karen Demirchyan.

• Armenians demand clarification of 1999 parliament attack

Witnesses say shots were heard on the street. Thousands of people gathered outside the parliament building half an hour later. Forces from the Ministry of Internal Affairs also assembled at the scene.

The armed group took around 50 deputies hostage and demanded to have direct talks with President Robert Kocharyan.

Negotiations then took place. The group demanded to go live on air as well as to be guaranteed a fair trial.

The hostages were released and members of the armed group were arrested on 28 October.

All the members of the group, except one, were sentenced to life imprisonment.

The leader of the group, Nairi Hunanyan, continues to serve in prison. However, many of his accomplices, including witnesses of the terrorist attack, have died under unexplained circumstances.

Eduard Grigoryan, who was sentenced to life imprisonment for participating in the 27 October attack, died on 5 November 2017.

Prior to his death, he had threatened to tell everyone that the authorities were trying to hide key information from society in connection with the shooting.

Grigoryan reported chest pain before being taken to hospital where he passed away.

Eight others died before Grigoryan did – all of them either participants in the attack or witnesses to it.

In 2000 Norayr Yeghiazaryan, an electrician, died of an electric shock while in his prison cell. His autopsy report indicated that he died from a 220 volt discharge, while the press reported the presence of head trauma which the authorities failed to explain.

On 27 October 2004, Vram Galstyan, who was sentenced to life in prison for his participation in the attack, committed suicide. Vram Galstyan periodically stated during his trial that he was being given psychotropic drugs and was strongly urged to commit suicide so that people would not learn the truth.

In May 2010 Hamlet Stepanyan also died in the same penitentiary. He had been sentenced to 14 years in prison and would have been free in two years. His autopsy report stated that he died of a heart attack. However, those close to him said he had no heart problems.

Tigran Naghdalyan, a journalist and chairman of the Public Television Council who was closely acquainted with Hunanyan and was a witness in the 27 October case, was killed in 2002 in Yerevan when leaving his parents’ home.

In 2004, MP Mushegh Movsisyan got into an accident on the Aparan-Yerevan highway. He had been arrested for his supposed involvement in the 27 October case, but was later released. Movsisyan was operated on after the accident but never regained consciousness.

Rosa Hovhannisyan, a former nurse who was a member of parliament, died in the United States after an accident. She was in parliament on the day of the attack.

Hasmik Abramyan, an employee of the parliaments’ protocol department, hung herself in the National Assembly building in 2004. She was also listed as a witness in the case.

In 2014 one of the main witnesses, Tigran Nazaryan, a correspondent and commentator on the National Television of Armenia and a close friend of Hunanyan, died in the United States. He entered the National Assembly hall on the day of the terrorist attack and talked with the head of the armed group for about two hours.

The perpetrators of the crime were punished. However, many in Armenia believe that the attack was orchestrated by others whose names have still not surfaced.

The true motives for the crime remain unclear, though several theories exist. One such theory goes that the act was organized by special services of other states. Another version states that the crime was organized by then-president Robert Kocharyan who allegedly wanted to eliminate his political rivals – the same people who were killed during the terrorist attack: Speaker Demirchyan and Prime Minister Sargsyan.

Nikol Pashinyan says that the case will not be reopened unless new details and evidence emerge.

Yerevan makes it into top 10 cities for a career in IT

JAM News
Oct 28 2018

30,000 specialists will be needed in the IT field in Armenia by 2025

Yerevan is one of the most favorable cities for programmers, says Enterprise Times in its list of top 10 cities across the world where it is best to build a career in IT.

The list notes that the need for programmers in Armenia will have increased threefold by 2025, with 30 thousand people in demand. Armenia’s IT sector has in recent years recorded an annual growth of more than 20 per cent, and estimates show that the trend will continue.

  • Computer programmers are the most in-demand specialists in Armenia
  • Drivers and security guards are in-demand in South Ossetia, while lawyers and economists are not

Enterprise Times writes that, in addition to the dynamic development of Armenia’s IT sector, the city is also attractive for its low cost of living and crime rate.

San Francisco, New York, Austin, Singapore, Melbourne, London, Stockholm, Bangalore and Toronto were also included on the list.

The leading IT companies in the world have offices in all of these cities. The number of companies continues to grow, while the need for programmers is also increasing.

  • Five benefits and five limitations of the education system reform in Armenia
  • What does Georgia’s Minister of Education say?

The IT sector has for many years been the fastest growing branch of the economy. Major international brands, including EPAM, Optim, Microsoft, IBM and VMware, have opened representative offices in the country. Some Armenian companies have also achieved success in the international arena – among them PicsArt, Sololearn and ZeroApp.

Leaders of many Armenian IT companies have for many years been trying to resolve the issue of a lack of specialists. Universities are not able to meet the demand, while private schools only partly help to alleviate the problem.

The lack of specialists has also led to a sharp increase in wages in the sector. Armenian programmers earn about the same as their Russian or Ukrainian colleagues. However, this may work against the budding industry, as Armenia may lose its attractiveness to external customers since it will cease to be cheap. This will leave work quality as the only advantage.

Man tries to blow himself up in Armenian government’s office

TASS, Russia
Oct 28 2018
World

October 28, 7:14 UTC+3 YEREVAN

              

© Artyom Geodakyan/TASS

YEREVAN, October 28. /TASS/. A man tried to enter the office of the Armenian Government and blow himself up with a grenade on Saturday evening, a spokesman for the National Security Service, Samson Galstyan, told TASS.

“The man, born in 1975, carried a grenade. He tried to enter the Armenian Government building and blow himself up. National Security Service officers on duty disarmed him,” he said.

According to Galstyan, the man, whose name is not disclosed, was detained, and a criminal case was launched against him. His motives are now being established.

Europe, Middle East map redrawn by WWI

The News International, Pakistan
Oct 28 2018
Listen
Europe, Middle East map redrawn by WWI

PARIS: Empires would fall, regions reconfigure, new countries form: the end of World War I overhauled the global balance of power and redrew the maps of Europe and the Middle East.

Here is an overview.

– Revolution in Russia –

The war rang the death knell for a Russian empire already in bad shape.

Repeated defeats, crippling military spending, famines, popular anger at the World War I bloodbath: all came together in the Marxist Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

In March that year a first revolution lead to the abdication of Nicholas II, Russia’s last tsar, and the formation of a new government that proved unable to assert control.

In November the Bolsheviks seized power in a second revolution. They immediately sought an exit from the devastating war, in which Russia had sided with the Allies against the Central Powers coalition of Germany, Austria-Hungary and others.

By December Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin had agreed an armistice to end combat; in March he agreed to a peace treaty with Germany and its allies that saw Russia give up large swathes of territory at the cost of 30 percent of its population.

Four states were created from territory once held by Russia: Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania.

– Demise of old Austria-Hungary –

At the outbreak of war in 1914, the Habsburg dynasty’s Austro-Hungarian empire — which had dominated central Europe for five centuries — stretched from Switzerland to Ukraine, grouping within it a dozen nationalities and more than 52 million people.

By the end of the conflict, the empire had exploded into several new countries, amid a nationalist fervour for autonomy.

Czechoslovakia was the first to be created, proclaimed in October 1918, and followed immediately by Yugoslavia, made up of Slavs in the southermost parts of the empire.

Austria-Hungary’s break-up was sealed in November with its signing of an armistice with the victorious Allied powers led by Britain, France and the United States.

The Paris Conference of 1919, where the final post-war peace treaty was reached, recognised the new countries and also resulted in the birth of Poland, previously divided between Austria and Russia.

Hungary lost two-thirds of its land, with Italy getting a section of the Alps region of Tyrol. And “the rest is Austria”, as the French prime minister, Georges Clemenceau, famously put it.

The separated Austria and Hungary that remained were reduced to small, landlocked countries.

– Ottoman fallout –

When Ottoman sultan Mehmed V proclaimed the “holy war” against France, Britain and Russia in November 1914, siding with the Central Powers, his empire had already lost most of its European possessions.

The setbacks it went on to suffer on the Russian front from 1915 served as a pretext to turn on its Armenian minority, labelled as traitors and suspected of harbouring nationalist sentiment.

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their people were killed during the war, and almost 30 countries have recognised the killings as genocide. Turkey refuses the term but accepts that massacres took place that, along with a famine, resulted

in the deaths of 300,000-500,000 Armenians and as many Turks.

The Ottoman defeat in World War I led to the final break-up of the once-mighty empire.

A first treaty signed with the victors in Sevres, France, in 1920 chopped off enormous parts of its territory, including Arab lands, and provided for an independent Armenia and autonomous Kurdistan and ceding other areas to Greece.

It was rejected by Turkish nationalists, led by Mustapha Kemal Ataturk, who

went on to topple the sultan and establish a Turkish republic.

They imposed a new treaty that was signed in Lausanne in 1923 and in which the republic retained Anatolia and areas around the Bosphorus Strait.

– Arab raw deal –

The British were able to triumph over the Ottoman empire thanks to the revolt of the Arab tribes in Mesopotamia and Palestine, for whom they held

out the promise of independence.

But Britain was also in secret talks with France to share out the Middle East between them, as set out in the Sykes-Picot Agreement signed in May 1916.

They decided that Lebanon and Syria were to go to France, and Jordan and Iraq to Britain.

The partition would feed Arab frustration. This mounted with the 1917 Balfour Declaration that

led to the establishment within Palestine of “a national home for the Jewish people”.

The state of Israel was created 30 years later, its troubled foundations causing a conflict that continues to disrupt the region today.

PARIS: Empires would fall, regions reconfigure, new countries form: the end of World War I overhauled the global balance of power and redrew the maps of Europe and the Middle East.

Here is an overview.

– Revolution in Russia –

The war rang the death knell for a Russian empire already in bad shape.

Repeated defeats, crippling military spending, famines, popular anger at the World War I bloodbath: all came together in the Marxist Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

In March that year a first revolution lead to the abdication of Nicholas II, Russia’s last tsar, and the formation of a new government that proved unable to assert control.

In November the Bolsheviks seized power in a second revolution. They immediately sought an exit from the devastating war, in which Russia had sided with the Allies against the Central Powers coalition of Germany, Austria-Hungary and others.

By December Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin had agreed an armistice to end combat; in March he agreed to a peace treaty with Germany and its allies that saw Russia give up large swathes of territory at the cost of 30 percent of its population.

Four states were created from territory once held by Russia: Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania.

– Demise of old Austria-Hungary –

At the outbreak of war in 1914, the Habsburg dynasty’s Austro-Hungarian empire — which had dominated central Europe for five centuries — stretched from Switzerland to Ukraine, grouping within it a dozen nationalities and more than 52 million people.

By the end of the conflict, the empire had exploded into several new countries, amid a nationalist fervour for autonomy.

Czechoslovakia was the first to be created, proclaimed in October 1918, and followed immediately by Yugoslavia, made up of Slavs in the southermost parts of the empire.

Austria-Hungary’s break-up was sealed in November with its signing of an armistice with the victorious Allied powers led by Britain, France and the United States.

The Paris Conference of 1919, where the final post-war peace treaty was reached, recognised the new countries and also resulted in the birth of Poland, previously divided between Austria and Russia.

Hungary lost two-thirds of its land, with Italy getting a section of the Alps region of Tyrol. And “the rest is Austria”, as the French prime minister, Georges Clemenceau, famously put it.

The separated Austria and Hungary that remained were reduced to small, landlocked countries.

– Ottoman fallout –

When Ottoman sultan Mehmed V proclaimed the “holy war” against France, Britain and Russia in November 1914, siding with the Central Powers, his empire had already lost most of its European possessions.

The setbacks it went on to suffer on the Russian front from 1915 served as a pretext to turn on its Armenian minority, labelled as traitors and suspected of harbouring nationalist sentiment.

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their people were killed during the war, and almost 30 countries have recognised the killings as genocide. Turkey refuses the term but accepts that massacres took place that, along with a famine, resulted

in the deaths of 300,000-500,000 Armenians and as many Turks.

The Ottoman defeat in World War I led to the final break-up of the once-mighty empire.

A first treaty signed with the victors in Sevres, France, in 1920 chopped off enormous parts of its territory, including Arab lands, and provided for an independent Armenia and autonomous Kurdistan and ceding other areas to Greece.

It was rejected by Turkish nationalists, led by Mustapha Kemal Ataturk, who

went on to topple the sultan and establish a Turkish republic.

They imposed a new treaty that was signed in Lausanne in 1923 and in which the republic retained Anatolia and areas around the Bosphorus Strait.

– Arab raw deal –

The British were able to triumph over the Ottoman empire thanks to the revolt of the Arab tribes in Mesopotamia and Palestine, for whom they held

out the promise of independence.

But Britain was also in secret talks with France to share out the Middle East between them, as set out in the Sykes-Picot Agreement signed in May 1916.

They decided that Lebanon and Syria were to go to France, and Jordan and Iraq to Britain.

The partition would feed Arab frustration. This mounted with the 1917 Balfour Declaration that

led to the establishment within Palestine of “a national home for the Jewish people”.

The state of Israel was created 30 years later, its troubled foundations causing a conflict that continues to disrupt the region today.