The ”epic” of provision of housing to the third president of Armenia continues

Arminfo, Armenia
Nov 3 2018
The ”epic” of provision of housing to the third president of Armenia continues

Yerevan November 3

Tatevik Shahunyan. The epic of the provision of housing to the third Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan has not ended yet.

As the head of the government’s office Eduard Aghajanyan told journalists, according to the law, the state is obliged to provide housing for the retired president, but all the options offered by the government have so far been rejected by Serzh Sargsyan, who, without waiting for the “proper” offer, left the “government mansions” and moved to the mansion of his son-in-law in the village of Jrvezh.

However, according to Agadzhanyan, the issue was not resolved by this, since the law obliges the state to provide housing for the retired president, and this requirement must be fulfilled. “I think that the question can be settled as follows – either Serzh Sargsyan refuses in written form the claims to receive housing from the state, or the state acquires housing for him, and then he himself decides whether to live in it or use it in any other way” Agadzhanyan explained.

To note, claiming the post of Prime Minister, the retired President Serzh Sargsyan also claimed the ownership of the mansion in the “government mansions” where he lived during the last 10 years of his presidency. However, after riots began in April, Sargsyan abandoned his idea, obviously thinking that this would calm the passions. After that, the government offered him various mansions, however, Sargsyan, under specious excuses, refused them, and eventually moved to the mansion of his son-in-law, without waiting for the coveted proposal. -l–

MG Co-Chairs welcome the agreements reached between Armenia and Azerbaijan in Dushanbe

Arminfo, Armenia
Nov 3 2018
MG Co-Chairs welcome the agreements reached between Armenia and Azerbaijan in Dushanbe

Yerevan November 3

Tatevik Shahunyan. The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group (Igor Popov of the Russian Federation, Stephane Visconti of France, and Andrew Schofer of the United States of America), together with the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk, visited the region from 29 October to 2 November, the press statement of the Co- Chairs reads.

The main purpose of the visit was to discuss the results of the conversation between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan on the margins of the CIS summit in Dushanbe in September, outline next steps in the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process, and review the overall evolution of the situation on the ground.

The Co-Chairs met with Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in Yerevan on 29 October and with President Ilham Aliyev in Baku on 1 November. In both capitals, they held consultations with the respective foreign ministers and defense ministers. On October 30-31, Co-Chairs met with the de facto authorities in Nagorno-Karabakh and visited the districts of Kelbajar and Agdam. On October 31, they participated in an OSCE ceasefire monitoring mission along the Line of Contact near Agdam. In Baku, the Co-Chairs met with representatives of Azerbaijani communities affected by the conflict. While in the region, the Co-Chairs discussed the situation with representatives from the ICRC and UNHCR. In their meetings with the Co-Chairs, the leaders in both capitals confirmed that the level of violence has fallen significantly since they reaffirmed in Dushanbe their commitment to reduce tensions. In their consultations, the Co-Chairs received additional details about the implementation of the Dushanbe understanding, including with regard to the establishment of direct communication links. The Co-Chairs welcomed these developments, commended the sides for implementing constructive measures in good faith, and expressed support for the leaders’ readiness to continue their dialogue. The Co-Chairs stressed the importance of sustaining a climate of trust for intensive negotiations on the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The Foreign Ministers agreed to meet again before the end of the year. The Co-Chairs will soon travel to Vienna to brief the OSCE Permanent Council and the members of the Minsk Group.

Book Review: Counting the cost of the Ottomans: Saul David on a brilliant travelogue through eleven countries that were once part of the Ottoman empire

The Daily Telegraph (London)
November 3, 2018 Saturday
Counting the cost of the Ottomans
BOOKS REVIEWS:  Saul David on a brilliant travelogue through eleven countries that were once part of the Ottoman empire
 
by Saul Davidon
  
OTTOMAN ODYSSEY
by Alev Scott
320pp,
Riverrun, £20, ebook £13.99
The First World War did for the Ottoman Empire – as it did for so many others – and in 1923, Ataturk’s Republic of Turkey rose from its ashes. Almost a century on, President Erdogan is trying to reassume the Ottomans’ role as leader of the Middle East, which seems as good a time as any for Alev Scott to ask: what was the legacy of Ottoman rule for the people of the Balkans, the Caucasus and the Levant? And what impact is that having on the political and social make-up of this troubled region? To answer these questions, the Anglo-Turkish Scott – recently banned from returning to her Istanbul home for writing articles critical of Erdogan – goes on her own odyssey through 11 countries of the former empire. Among her interviewees are descendants of ancient minorities that flourished in the empire, but have since been intimidated, or even expelled; and those who live far from Turkey but who identify as “Ottoman in some vague but visceral sense, encouraged by the current Turkish government’s attempts to resurrect regional influence”.
 
Along the way, Scott quizzes them – and herself – about difficult subjects such as “forced migration, genocide, exile, diaspora, collective memory and identity, not just about religious coexistence”. One of the most moving sections of this beautifully written book – which combines history, travel writing and personal discovery – is when Scott, an avowed Turkophile, visits Yerevan’s Genocide Museum in Armenia, set up in memory of the million or so Armenians killed by the Turks in 1915. As a child, Scott “absorbed a certain suspicion that the West had used the genocide unfairly as a stick with which to beat Turkey for the crimes of their Ottoman predecessors”. The trip to the museum changes everything. “There was,” she writes, “so much proof, too much proof that a genocide had taken place.”
 
Comparing the relationship between Turkey and Armenia with that of Israel and Palestine – “historical claims to land, displaced people, religious partisanship, genocide recognition and beleaguered diplomacy” – she worries that countries that fail to acknowledge their dark past are in danger of repeating their crimes. The solution, she feels, is for Turkey to take a leaf out of Spain and Portugal’s book – both have offered citizenship to Sephardic Jews to atone for the Inquisition – and offer residency to all Armenians.
 
Scott is similarly clear-eyed about the forced migration of millions of Greek-born Muslims to Turkey and the reciprocal dispatch of Ottoman Christians to Greece, as per the terms of the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne. Despite their religion, many spoke only their national language – Turkish in the case of the former group, Greek for the latter – and were understandably traumatised by the upheaval.
 
But there has been the odd silver lining. Modern ethnically cleansed Turkey – and Greece for that matter – is less susceptible to the sort of internecine strife that is tearing Syria apart. Scott thinks it is no coincidence that the residents of Lesbos – about 60 per cent of whom are descended from Christians deported from Turkey – have shown great generosity to the thousands of Syrian refugees who have descended on their shores.
 
Visiting Jerusalem, she notes the alarming statistic that, in 1917, in the last days of Ottoman control, “Arabs made up 90 per cent of the population of Palestine”. Today they comprise just 20 per cent of the state of the Israel, a huge population shift that was set in motion by the Balfour Declaration, the British government’s statement of support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine in November 1917. Before that, notes Scott, there was a lot of social interaction between Jewish and Muslim families. Not any more.
 
In Lebanon, Scott meets the former Druze warlord Walid Jumblatt, who asks: “Who is not bloody and ruthless in Lebanon? We are all ruthless; everybody is a warlord!” For all his bluster, Scott detects a Macbeth-like figure: “ambitious and ruthless”, but also “horrified by the inevitability of conflict – and perhaps by his own part in it”. Keen to understand more about the Druze, a “pacifist, puritanical faith” that believes in reincarnation and gives Plato and Pythagoras’s teachings “equal weight to those of the Abrahamic prophets”, Scott meets two spiritual leaders, sheikhs Saleh and Majed.
 
The first tells her that she, a non-Druze, is damned because of her choices “over the past hundreds of millions of years”. The second insists his faith is gender-blind, yet refuses to have his picture taken with her (he has no problem posing for one with her male colleague).
 
Scott’s writing is lyrical.
 
Jerusalem is “pockmarked by conflict and heavy with tension”, its air “laced with a mix of winter street food: roasted chestnuts, Turkish coffee and frying meat, overlaid with the occasional waft of cheap frankincense”. This book is only her second, yet she writes with a maturity and insight that belies her age, and is surely a rising star of the literary world. Her overall message is one of optimism: that identity is as much about language as it is about location and religion; and that a “shared culture” will trump jingoistic national differences. I hope she’s right.
 
Call 0844 871 1514 to order a copy from the Telegraph for £16.99
 
Almost a century on, Erdogan is trying to make Turkey leader of the Middle East again

Top marks for summit of osteoporosis societies in Armenia!

International Osteoporosis Foundation
Oct 30, 2018 Saturday
Top marks for summit of osteoporosis societies in Armenia!
 
The 2nd Summit for Eurasian and Eastern European societies, held on October 23, 2018, was an outstanding event and highly valued opportunity for networking, learning and sharing new ideas.

“It was unforgettable and inspiring!” stated IOF CEO Philippe Halbout when describing the 2nd International Summit in Armenia for Eurasian and Eastern European Countries. The Summit, held in Yerevan, Armenia and hosted by the Armenian Osteoporosis Association, brought together IOF member societies from 19 countries (see participant list below).

Held for the second time, the Summit has become a highly anticipated event thanks to the efforts of Dr John Bilezikian, Professor of Medicine and of Pharmacology at the College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, and Chief of the Division of Endocrinology and Director of the Metabolic Bone Diseases Program at Columbia University Medical Centre. 

The Summit is a networking and capacity-building event for IOF member societies and other patient and medical organizations in the Eastern European and Eurasian region. It was followed by the 12th Annual International Osteoporosis Symposium in Armenia, a conference (founded by Prof. Bilezikian), which attracts speakers from America and Europe and shares the latest clinical developments with health professionals in the region.

The Summit programme included ten-minute presentations by Olga Ershova, President of OSTEORUS, Russia; Gulzhan Gabdulina, President of the Kazakhstan Association of Medical Doctors on Osteoporosis; Olga Lovanchenko, President, Kyrgyz Ass. on Osteoporosis; and Angela Chicu, President of the Ass. of Prophylaxis of Osteoporosis from Moldova. A Roundtable for all patient societies was followed by an overview of the development of country-specific FRAX models, and 10-minute presentations on the utilization of FRAX by speakers from Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Romania. The development of Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) worldwide was discussed in a one-hour session by speakers Olga Ershova (Russia), Edward Czerwinski (Poland) and John Bilizikian (USA). Concluding remarks were made by IOF President Philippe Halbout and Summit directors Olga Lesnyak, Varta Babalyan, and John Bilezikian.

Varta Babalyan, President of the Armenian Osteoporosis Association stated:

The Summit, the second to be initiated by John Bilezikian, is a very important event for Armenia. The focus of the summit was to unite the regional associations and it seems to have succeeded!”

Professor Bilezikian added:

The exchange of information in the field of osteoporosis is very important. Unlike the first summit, today more specialists have arrived in Armenia to introduce the activities, problems and achievements of their associations, and this is very important.”

Dr Olga Lesnyak, President of the Russian Osteoporosis Association, commented:

We find it very important to participate in this kind of event, as there is an opportunity to listen and compare. Moreover, we are neighbours, so we have the same problems, which is not accidental. Almost all countries of the former Soviet Union have a very similar healthcare system.”

Dr Lesnyak expressed her appreciation of the work done by the Armenian Osteoporosis Association and added: “Armenia can serve as an example for many countries. The Armenian Osteoporosis Association carries out a lot of activities and the tremendous impact is obvious. I am sure that the participants will learn a lot from this experience.”

As honoured guest of the Summit, Dr Philippe Halbout, IOF Chief Executive Officer, emphasized IOF’s admiration and appreciation:

It is a great honour for us to participate at this Summit which is attended by leading specialists and 22 osteoporosis-related associations representing 19 countries.  The participants are here to raise awareness of the issues and problems in their countries – in which they play an invaluable role in helping to alleviate suffering and in promoting prevention and treatment for at-risk patients.  I am delighted to see the quantity and quality of the education and awareness campaigns, and the widespread use of IOF resources by the organizations in this region.”

Lavrov: Until internal political processes in Armenia are completed, it will hardly be possible to seriously consider concrete options for resolving the Karabakh crisis

Arminfo, Armenia
Nov 2 2018
Lavrov: Until internal political processes in Armenia are completed, it will hardly be possible to seriously consider concrete options for resolving the Karabakh crisis

Yerevan November 2

Marianna Mkrtchyan. Until internal political processes in Armenia are completed, it will hardly be possible to work seriously, to consider concrete options for getting out of this crisis and ensuring a full-fledged Nagorno-Karabakh settlement. This was announced on November 2 in Moscow during a press conference with OSCE Secretary General Thomas Greminger by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, commenting on the recent processes around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the agreement in Dushanbe, as well as appeals from Yerevan to draw Artsakh to the negotiating table.

He recalled that Russia is one of the three countries of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs. According to him, it is in this format that quite intensive efforts have been made in recent years to find ways to unblock the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. “As far as I know, the agreement of the Dushanbey meeting of the RA Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev was that contacts should be continued, and that the foreign ministers would meet, and that, of course, both Armenia and Azerbaijan will work with the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs, we welcome such an agreement, although of course we understand that as long as the internal political processes in Armenia are not completed, such stormy ones that we are seeing now are hardly possible to work seriously, assmatrivat specific options out of the crisis, and to ensure full functionality of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict “, – Lavrov expressed his belief.

Although, according to the Russian minister, contacts are planned in the process of preparing for these extraordinary parliamentary elections, which are scheduled for December in Armenia, and the co-chairs visit the region, meet with the leadership of Armenia and Azerbaijan, with the foreign ministers. According to him, the maintenance of such contacts, it is probably important that, as soon as circumstances allow, to engage in a serious consideration of issues related to the settlement.

“As for the announcements that Pashinyan made on several occasions about the need to involve the Nagorno-Karabakh party in the negotiations, we have already commented on these statements. This is an issue that should be resolved by the parties to the conflict In due time, the Karabakh representatives took part in the talks between Baku and Yerevan, at the suggestion of the Armenian leadership, this practice was changed and negotiations have been going on for many years only between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Of course, we proceed from the fact that Yerevan, in its negotiating positions, takes into account the approaches of Karabakh, but in order to change the current bilateral negotiation format, we need the consent of both parties. As far as we know, there is no such agreement. And I would not, frankly, put forward preliminary conditions in order to begin to consider the essential issues of the Karabakh settlement, “Lavrov concluded.

Conditions for normalization of relations with Armenia were called in Ankara

Arminfo, Armenia
Nov 2 2018
Conditions for normalization of relations with Armenia were called in Ankara

Yerevan November 2

Marianna Mkrtchyan. Turkey’s position on Armenia is district and clear – there can be no talk about the normalization of relations without the liberation of the “occupied Azerbaijani territories”.

Ankara also stressed that, as before, she will support Azerbaijan and keep the Karabakh issue on its foreign policy agenda, Trend reports with reference to the presidential administration of Turkey.

“If Armenia wants to normalize relations with Turkey, then it should immediately release the ”occupied Azerbaijani territories””, the Turkish Presidential Administration said, adding that Armenia should renounce claims about the events of 1915 against Turkey.

“Despite all appeals by Turkey to open the archives and create a joint commission to investigate of 1915, Armenia has not yet taken any steps in this direction. Armenia’s refusal of Turkey’s proposal to open the archives and the creation of a joint commission itself speaks about that there was no Armenian Genocide in the history of Turkey, “the Erdogan administration said.

Yerterday, from the rostrum of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia, Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that Armenia is ready to settle relations with Turkey without preconditions. According to him, this position should not be tied to the process of international recognition of the Armenian Genocide, which for Yerevan is a matter of national and international security, since it is aimed at preventing new genocides. “From Armenia’s side, the borders with Turkey are open, they are opened by Turkey itself, linking the unblocking of borders with the resolution of the Karabakh conflict in favor of Azerbaijan. This is an erroneous policy; the Prime Minister, adding that such a position leads to even greater cohesion of the Armenian and Artsakh societies.

Zohrab Mnatsakanyan: Pashinyan’s statement on the possible closure of the Armenian-Iranian border should be considered in the context of the geopolitical situation

Arminfo, Armenia
Nov 2 2018
Zohrab Mnatsakanyan: Pashinyan’s statement on the possible closure of the Armenian-Iranian border should be considered in the context of the geopolitical situation

Yerevan November 02

Ani Mshetsyan. Pashinyan’s statement on the possible closure of the Armenian-Iranian border should be viewed in the context of the geopolitical situation in the world. This was announced on November 2 in the parliament by the Acting Armenian Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanyan.

He noted that in any situation the interests of Armenia are of prime importance. “Armenia conducts its foreign policy on the basis of its interests, and international relations serve us to advance our interests. Sometimes we have to pursue foreign policy on the basis of the current situation when we need to make a serious choice. All issues related to foreign policy relations with Armenia’s neighbors are included in the program government “, – stressed Mnatsakanyan.

He stressed that relations with both Iran and Georgia are very important for Armenia. “The manifestation of this policy takes place in a situation in which there are many challenges. How events will develop and how this will affect our relations with Iran is the most important issue for us. Our main task is to defend the interests of Armenia, cooperating with those partners who play the main role for her “, – stressed. Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Mnatsakanyan assured that in his statement Pashinyan appealed to the deep-seated challenges facing the republic about their possible negative consequences. “In our foreign policy, we work with all partners to solve problems through cooperation and dialogue in order to reduce risks,” said Mnatsakanyan. He noted that Armenia has developed friendly relations with Iran.

Note that yesterday and. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, speaking of geopolitical risks, said that “the de facto Armenian-Iranian border can be closed at any moment due to relations between Iran and the United States.”

Zohrab Mnatsakanyan: The main aspects of Armenia’s foreign policy were presented during Bolton’s visit

Arminfo, Armenia
Nov 2 2018
Zohrab Mnatsakanyan: The main aspects of Armenia’s foreign policy were presented during Bolton’s visit

Yerevan November 02

Ani Mshetsyan. The visit of such a high-ranking US official as John Bolton to Armenia is very important, especially considering the geopolitical situation in the world. This was announced on November 2 in the Armenian parliament by the acting president. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia Zohrab Mnatsakanyan.

“It is very important for us to discuss the geopolitical situation, to have support and understand each other on all the issues related to our national security. For us it was a very good reason to explain the logic of our actions with our partners from the United States,” said Mnatsakanyan.

He also stated that this was neither the beginning nor the end of the Armenian-American cooperation. “It was a good opportunity to discuss and compare our approaches on a number of issues that are of primary importance for us. Our policy is pro-Armenian and formed within reasonable assessments, and one of the most important goals for us is to explain this policy to our foreign partners. Bolton’s visit to Armenia is important. This is an opportunity to hear our colleagues, become a friend, become more understandable and continue our cooperation, “said Mnatsakanyan.

He noted that Armenia is a small country, and the issue of its security is a priority, since the republic faces various challenges. “We have a dialogue with Russia, with Iran. We have opportunities to develop our cooperation at all platforms where we can express our position. And when we talk about the importance of Bolton’s visit, we should note that this importance lies in the fact that touched a very rich foreign policy agenda. Our main goal was to make our policy understandable. The dialogue was very successful, and the US understood our logic of relations with the Russian Federation, Iran, our position on the Nagorno- Karabakh issue, relations with Turkey, etc. Moreover, we noted h for we do not build our relations with this or that country, at the expense of relations with other partners “, – concluded Mnatsakanyan.

During the February Munich Security Conference, the key topic will be the Karabakh settlement

Arminfo, Armenia
Nov 2 2018
During the February Munich Security Conference, the key topic will be the Karabakh settlement

Yerevan November 02

Tatevik Shahunyan. During the February Munich Security Conference, the key issue will be the Karabakh settlement. The President of Armenia Armen Sargsyan said this in a conversation with journalists.

He noted that the initiative to discuss the Karabakh issue at the next conference belongs to him. “This will in no way hinder the activities of the OSCE Minsk Group, but rather contribute to it,” said Sargsyan, adding that the Prime Minister of Armenia and the President of Azerbaijan will also attend the conference. According to the president, the Armenian side is the initiator in the Karabakh settlement.

“After all, it’s in Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan that offered to President Ilham Aliyev the agreements that provide for an armistice regime today,” Sargsyan said, adding that Armenia cannot stay away from global geopolitical processes. “At such conferences, we understand that our destiny is in our hands,” he stressed. During the conference itself, Sarkitsyan responded to the accusation of the Azerbaijani delegates that the second and third presidents of Armenia did not have the right to govern the country, since they were not its citizens: “Only the Armenian people have the right to raise questions of the legitimacy of the presidents of Armenia.” Further, Sargsyan expressed concern about the militarization of Azerbaijan. “With this in mind, it can be stated that time does not play for the benefit of the world. There is a possibility of a chain reaction. There will soon be elections in Armenia, after which a legitimate power will be fully formed in the country, people who sit at the negotiating table will be elected, everyone the hands of the people “, – said Sargsyan. Calling to listen to the will of the Artsakh people, Sargsyan thanked the OSCE Minsk Group for the peacemaking efforts. “There is no military way of the Karabakh conflict if the war resumes, everyone will suffer – – Artsakh, Armenia, Azerbaijan,” he concluded.


Ara Güler: Photographer whose pictures of Istanbul evoked the sadness of the loss of the Ottoman Empire

The Daily Telegraph (London)
November 2, 2018 Friday
Ara Güler: Photographer whose pictures of Istanbul evoked the sadness of the loss of the Ottoman Empire
 

 
ARA GÜLER, who has died aged 90, was a photojournalist who became known as the “eye of Istanbul” for his atmospheric black and white photographs of the city, taken over more than 60 years, which seemed to evoke what the Nobel Prize-winning novelist Orhan Pamuk described as “the cloud of gloom and loss that the fall of the Ottoman Empire had spread over Istanbul”.
 
As a member of the Magnum photographic agency, Güler travelled the world, taking colour photographs of scenes in India, Bangladesh, Burma, the Philippines, Kenya, Senegal and many more, and making portraits of such figures as Churchill, Bertrand Russell, Maria Callas, Alfred Hitchcock, Picasso and Tennessee Williams. Yet he was most proud of his work in his native Turkey and especially in Istanbul, where he lived all his life and whose crumbling charms are increasingly being lost to slick commercialisation.
 
Güler’s photographs featured views of abandoned wooden houses, fog-wreathed minarets, ice on the Bosporus – and the people of the city: a grubby child peering from behind decaying tombstones inscribed with ornate Arabic script; labourers unloading hulking freighters; fishermen in coffee shops mending their nets, couples walking down foggy streets; old men gazing out over their drinks; horses pulling carts up snowy hillsides, and Muslim worshippers bowing in prayer. Orhan Pamuk used some to illustrate his nostalgic memoir Istanbul: Memories of a City, helping him to evoke his “huzun” – sense of desolation – at what had happened to his beloved city since his childhood.
 
The Turkish writer Yasar Kemal, who compared Güler’s talents to those of Cezanne, Turner and Gauguin, observed that he delved deeply “into both nature and man … For years perhaps he carries within him a certain face, a certain smile, a certain _expression_ of pain or sadness. And then, when the time is ripe, he presses the button.” Güler acknowledged having learned his technique through studying great painters. But he dismissed the idea that he was an artist, insisting that he was a mere “press photographer”: “Photography looks like art, but art has to have some kind of depth. Painting is art. Music is art … Photography is interpretation. I hate the idea of becoming an artist. My job is to travel and record what I see.” He was born Ara Derderyan to Armenian parents on August 16 1928 in Beyoglu, Istanbul. In 1935 a law compelled them to take a Turkish surname. His father owned a pharmacy in the Galatasaray neighbourhood and sold many of the powders and chemicals used by Turkish filmmakers to develop their film, inspiring Ara to pursue a career in cinema.
 
While at the Getronagan Armenian High School, he did odd jobs in film studios and attended drama courses. One day, however, there was a huge fire in the studio where he was working and he had to climb on to the roof to be rescued. The building eventually collapsed. “My father decided that enough was enough, and he got me a job in a newspaper. There, I learned that writing an article takes a long time. I liked photography better. You got faster results.”
 
He joined the newspaper Yeni Istanbul in 1950 and studied Economics at the University of Istanbul at the same time. He moved to another paper, Hürriyet, before joining the Turkish magazine Hayat as head of the photographic department. In 1958 he was hired by the American magazine group Time Life, which had opened an office in Istanbul. Henri Cartier-Bresson and Marc Riboud recruited him for the Magnum agency; later on he left to work freelance.
 
In 1961 the British magazine, Photography Annual, named him one of the world’s seven greatest photographers, and he became the only Turkish member of the American Society of Magazine Photographers. The same year the Swiss magazine Camera devoted an issue to him.
 
Though of Armenian ancestry, Güler claimed that he considered himself “just a Turkish person like any Ahmet or Mehmet”. Yet Orhan Pamuk recently recalled in the New York Times how Guler walked into his office in 2005 after he (Pamuk) had received death threats from Turkish nationalists. Pamuk had given an interview complaining that it was still impossible to talk in Turkey about the terrible things that were done to the Ottoman Armenians 90 years before. Guler “was out of breath and cursing everything and everyone, in his characteristic manner. Then he embraced me with his huge frame and started to cry. Those who knew Ara … will understand my amazement at seeing him cry like that. He kept on swearing and telling me, ‘They can’t touch you, those people!’ “After crying for a very long time, Ara finally calmed down, and then, as if this had been the whole purpose of his visit to my office, he drank a glass of water and left.” In their previous conversations, Pamuk had never felt able to touch upon the destruction of the Ottoman Armenians, but now, “I no longer felt the urge to ask him about his grandfathers and grandmothers. The great photographer had already told me everything through his tears.”
 
Güler felt that the young of Istanbul no longer knew or appreciated the history of their city: “What they know is the junk of Istanbul. The poetic, romantic, aesthetic aspect of the city is lost. I understand the smell of Istanbul … But the great culture I knew is gone.” Güler’s first marriage, to Perihan Sariöz, was dissolved. His second wife, Suna Taskiran, died in 2010.
 
Ara Güler, born August 16 1928, died October 17 2018