ANCC Statement on Remembrance Day

Armenian
National Committee of Canada

Comité
National Arménien du Canada

 

Tel./Tél. (613) 235-2622

E-mail/Courriel:[email protected]

www.anccanada.org

 

-PRESS RELEASE-

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

                                                                        Contact: Sevag Belian (613) 235-2622

 

 

ANCC Statement on Remembrance Day

 

 

OTTAWA.-
The ultimate sacrifice, of one’s life, in defense of a nation, of peace, of
freedom, is a sacrifice we must always remember and honour.

 

Armenians
who survived the Genocide and deportations from their ancestral lands early in
the 20th century spread around the world in search of freedom and dignity.
The sons and daughters of those who landed in Canada have proudly served Canada
in every foreign mission dating from the First World War through Afghanistan
and the present day.

 

Learning
from the lessons of our own history, Armenian Canadians also have a moral
obligation to remember and to pay tribute to the many unknown victims of war,
of war crimes and of crimes against humanity. They, too, are amongst those
brave men and women who have sacrificed their lives for our wellbeing today.

 

On
behalf of the Armenian-Canadian community, The Armenian National Committee of
Canada would like to thank the Canadian Government and its armed forces for the
security and safety they bring to our community and our country from coast to
coast. We remember and are grateful for the ultimate sacrifices of all those
who have fallen on and off the battlefields to protect our welfare.

 

This
year, on the 102
nd anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, we also
remember and thank the Canadian civilians and missionaries who supported and
saved Armenian lives in the Ottoman Empire during World War I, and helped many
of them build new lives in Canada.

 

Remembering
the Armenian-Canadian soldiers of the World Wars

 

Today,
we mark Remembrance Day and the end of the hostilities of the First World War.
It was under the cover of World War I that the Armenian Genocide was undertaken
in 1915. It was in the midst of the fighting that the Republic of Armenia
declared its independence in 1918. It was the consequent peace process that
vested the United States as arbitrator for the new republic’s border with
Turkey, which was decided by President Woodrow Wilson.

 

Often
overlooked, however, is the contribution that Armenian-Canadians played in the
Canadian Armed Forces during both the first and second world wars. Today, as we
honour all those who put their life on the line to defend our freedom, let us
also remember:

 

Andrew
Artinian, Charles Artinian, Dikran Artinian, Herman Aram Asadourian, George
Asadourian, Reggie Avedisian, Andrew Antranig Chichakian, Samuel Chichakian,
Richard Essraelian, Sarkis Halagian, Richard Hoogasian, George Kalagian,
Nigoghos Kalagian, Susan Kalagian, Shoghomon Koloian, Edward Krekorian, Arthur
Ashod Kuderian, John Magarian, Levon Magarian, Kirk Matosian, Michael Minoian,
Avak Moligian, Arthur Avedis Mooradian, John Moukperian, George Sahakian, Paul
Solomonian, Hagop Torosian, Harry Torosian, Hygus Torosian, and William
Zampigian.

 

-30-

 

******

 

 

The ANCC is the largest and the most influential Armenian-Canadian
grassroots human rights organization. Working in coordination with a network of
offices, chapters, and supporters throughout Canada and affiliated
organizations around the world, the ANCC actively advances the concerns of the Armenian-Canadian
community on a broad range of issues and works to eliminate abuses of human
rights throughout Canada and the world.

Sevag Belian – Executive Director
Armenian National Committee of Canada
T: (613) 235-2622 | C: (905) 329-8526
E:

Farewell ceremony for President of Moldova held in Armenian Presidential Palace

Categories
Official
Politics

Farewell ceremony for President of Moldova Igor Dodon was held in the Armenian Presidential Palace on November 10, press service of the President’s Office reported.

Before the ceremony the Armenian and Moldovan Presidents held a private meeting during which they highly appreciated the results of talks during Mr. Dodon’s visit which will give new impetus to the development of bilateral friendly ties and deepening the cooperation in fields of mutual interest.

“Dear Mr. President,

I want to once again express confidence that your visit to Armenia will enrich the agenda of our relations and cooperation in political, economic and humanitarian spheres since in fact we need this, and it derives from the interests of our peoples. Yesterday you visited the Parliament, today you will meet the Prime Minister of Armenia, in other words, there is a chance to hold talks on all issues.

Of course, we have a lot in common both in bilateral relations and aspirations of our peoples, as well as in our personal aspirations, and we will reach success through cooperation. I think we need to move forward in this way. Once again I want to thank you for the visit. We held productive talks discussing many issues of mutual interest”, the Armenian President said.

In his turn the Moldovan President thanked his Armenian counterpart for the invitation and wonderful reception, stating that he can say for sure that the visit was effective as expected.

“In fact, yesterday we touched upon all issues of bilateral cooperation. We agreed to hold a session of the Inter-governmental commission in near future. I hope it will take place in the first half of next year together with the business forum.

Yesterday we had many effective talks with the leadership of the Parliament and lawmakers. We agreed to propose an initiative, and we will invite Armenian MPs, who will work in the inter-parliamentary friendship group, to Moldova. I hope this will happen in the upcoming months. We have also discussed other issues relating to cooperation of our countries. I once again want to thank for the invitation.

Mr. President, we look forward to your visit to Moldova”, Igor Dodon said.

“Very important to be in cradle of Christianity” – Moldova President inspired and impressed with Etchmiatsin

Category
Society

President of Moldova Igor Dodon is impressed by the Mother See of Holy Etchmiatsin, and by talking to people who preserve Christian values.

“For me, as an Orthodox Christian, and a leader of a country where more than 98% of the population is Orthodox Christian, was very important to be in the cradle of Christianity. Christianity appeared on this land earlier than in other countries. The sacred sites, this 4th century Cathedral where are now is inspiring, and the interactions with people who preserve these values”, Igor Dodon said during his visit to Etchmiatsin.

He wished to the Armenians of the Diaspora faith, optimism and mentioned that he is convinced that everything will succeed for both the Armenians and Moldovans.

The President and First Lady toured the Alek and Mari Manukyan Treasury-Museum and the Mother See’s Museum.

400 Educators Participate in Prelacy Schools’ Professional Development Day Conference

Board of Regents Members with Archbishop Mardirossian and Dr. Kaloust Hagopian, Executive Council Member

NORTHRIDGE, Calif.—The Board of Regents of Prelacy Armenian Schools held its 2017-2018 Annual Professional Development Day (APDD) conference on Saturday, October 28th at California State University, Northridge.

This year’s APDD, which has been taking place for over fifteen years, was once again organized in cooperation with CSUN’s Armenian Studies Program. Alongside the Prelacy Armenian Schools and Preschools, the conference also included teachers and faculty from Sahag Mesrob Armenian Christian School, Armenian Sisters Academy, Charlie Keyan Armenian Community School of Fresno and Armenian Relief Society Saturday Schools, bringing the number of participants to over 400.

Dr. Hasmig Baran, Board of Regents member, welcomed all the participants to this year’s APDD and invited Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian, Prelate of the Western Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church, to deliver the invocation. In his address, the prelate emphasized the significance of ongoing professional development. Archbishop Mardirossian stated, “Competent and well-performing teachers are the most valuable assets to any educational institution, and can have a great impact on the quality of education. Thus, it is crucial for both new and veteran teachers to have adequate support and training and ongoing opportunities to learn from each other, as well as to keep up-to-date on new learning methods and resources, emerging technology, and more.

Lisa Gaboudian, Chairwoman of the Board of Regents of Prelacy Armenian Schools, welcomed the educators and expressed her appreciation for the level of dedication and commitment from all the participants. After commending the attending Armenian Daily Schools and Preschools and their respective Principals and Directors, she thanked Dr. Vahram Shemmassian, Director of the Armenian Studies Program at CSUN, for working in tangent with the Board of Regents and for once again hosting the Annual Professional Development Day conference. During her remarks, Gaboudian underscored the importance of “teachers becoming learners themselves” and the significance of instilling Armenian principles and values in students while also preparing them to become well-rounded and outstanding Armenian-American citizens. She asked the participants to think about the following quotation from John Meehan, “We are not ‘just’ teachers, we are managers of the world’s greatest resources: CHILDREN.”

Some of the 400 participants at the Prelacy Board of Regents annual Professional Development Conference

The keynote address of the day was delivered by Mrs. Vivian Ekchian, Associate Superintendent of the Los Angeles Unified School District. Mrs. Ekchian, who is not a stranger to the Prelacy Schools, shared her dual experiences within both the Armenian and non-Armenian communities and highlighted the opportunities these conferences provide for teachers to grow both personally and professionally. She qualified teachers as “heroes” who dedicate their time, energy and expertise educating the next generation of adults. She asked teachers to carry on their responsibilities with pride.

Following the keynote address, Suren Seropian, Director of Development – College of Humanities at CSUN, shared the logistics for the day, including a general overview of the scheduled sessions and their presenters.

An unprecedented variety of topics were presented by experts in their own fields and many Prelacy Armenian school teachers.

  • Effective Communication with Press & Media – Ara Khachatourian
  • Teaching Language Through Song – Dr. Karenn Chutjian Presti
  • The Art of Communication and Effective Listening – Nora Chitilian Kalachian
  • The Psychological Effects of Bullying and Prevention Programs – Natalie Jambazian
  • Educational Apps – Dr. Brian Landisi
  • Differentiated Instruction – Ari Ryan Sarafian
  • RTI – Interventions vs. Strategies – Souzy Ohanian
  • Design-Based Learning – Natalie Bezdjian
  • Integrating Academic Language Across the Curriculum – Sandra Halajian
  • How to Crank Up the Rigor & Engagement in Your AP Classes – Lilit Vartanian
  • Armenian Digital Library – Razmig Haroun and Tamar Tufenkjian
  • What Does STEM Excellence Look Like In ECE – Kristina Movsessian
  • World of Puppets – Lilit Alajajian
  • Armenian Language Revitalization Committee Projects – Armen Abrahamian
  • Classroom Observation – Dr. Brian Landisi, Lena Kortoshian, and Armineh Papazian
  • Integrating Technology Into the Classroom – Ara Chouljian
  • A Taste of Good Health – Best Practices in School-Based Obesity Prevention – Jocelyn Harrison
  • New Resources for Armenian Education – Saro Nazarian
  • Introduction to Robotics – Hrant Papazian
  • Importance of Abstract Quantitative Reasoning in Real World Math Problems – Armond Khodagulyan
  • Preparing Students for Success in AP Literature – Mashelle Kirkman
  • Course Expectations and Introduction to AP Sciences – Moushegh Bedhoian
  • Effective Teaching Methods: Spelling, Vocabulary, and Fluency – Talin Ordekian
  • Early Intervention for Preschool/Kindergarten Students with Challenging Behaviors – Jeannine Topalian

Based on the positive feedback from the attendees, the Board of Regents is confident that this year’s conference was a tremendous success. The Annual Professional Development Day conference serves as a unique opportunity for educators of Armenian Schools to come together, get acquainted with one another, and share their experiences and expertise. These workshops are designed to further advance the educational knowledge of the participants, while expanding their horizons with innovative and new educational approaches.

En 1924, la France a acheté à la Turquie plus de 400 tonnes d’os de Grecs et d’Arméniens massacrés par les Turcs

La Gazette Du Citoyen
1 nov 2017
En 1924, la France a acheté à la Turquie plus de 400 tonnes d’os de Grecs et d’Arméniens massacrés par les Turcs

Publié le 1 novembre 2017

Les Turcs ont vendu les os des Grecs et des Arméniens qu’ils avaient massacrés après la 1ere guerre mondiale. 400 tonnes d’os ont été achetées par la France pour un usage industriel.

Ces massacres en Asie Mineure ont entraîné la mort de milliers de personnes (en septembre 1922, plus de 200,000 civils grecs ont été tués par les Turcs à Smyrne) et le déplacement de 1,5 million de Grecs.

Un autre crime commis par les Turcs s’est produit deux ans plus tard et est resté inconnu pendant des années. Il s’agit de la vente des ossements de tous les gens qui avaient été massacrés par les Jeunes Turcs de Mustafa Kemal.

A gauche, les ossements vendus, à droite, Mustafa Kemal

Selon les rapports, les os des Grecs ont été vendus par les Turcs aux Français pour un “usage” industriel! Au total, 400 tonnes d’ossements humains, soit les ossements de 50,000 personnes, ont été transférées aux industries françaises à Marseille. Le 13 décembre 1924, un navire britannique est arrivé à Thessalonique, en Grèce. Lorsque les travailleurs du port ont su que la cargaison se composait d’os, ils ont empêché le bateau de repartir. Ensuite, des réfugiés choqués qui réclamaient la saisie de l’envoi ont manifestés dans la ville, .

Finalement, le consulat du Royaume Uni est intervenu et le gouvernement grec a autorisé le départ du bateau afin d’éviter un conflit avec les Britanniques. Le 14 décembre 1924, le journal “Macedonia” confirmait l’arrivée du navire à Thessalonique mais ne mentionnait pas que la cargaison de ce dernier se composait d’ossements humains.

Le même mois, le New York Times publiait un article avec le titre suivant: “Une incroyable histoire d’une expédition d’os humains.” Un autre article du journal français Midi mentionnait les ossements des victimes du génocide arménien humains qui devaient être vendus à Marseille.

A gauche, l’article du New York Times, à droite celui de Midi

Elias Venezis dans son livre “Number 31328” mentionne le processus de collecte des ossements par des personnes capturées par les Turcs. Quand il avait 18 ans, Venezis a été capturé avec 3.000 autres personnes. Il a écrit le livre après son retour d’Orient, pour décrire les difficultés que lui et d’autres prisonniers ont traversées après la catastrophe d’Asie Mineure.

Dans le prologue de son livre, il écrit: “Il n’y a rien de plus profond et de plus saint qu’un corps en souffrance, ce livre est dédié à cette souffrance.”

Lien de l’article en anglais:

http://www.thinkinghumanity.com/2017/10/they-sold-the-bones-of-greeks-and-armenians-who-were-killed-in-turkey-400-tons-of-bones-were-transferred-to-france-for-industrial-use.html

They Sold the Bones of Greeks And Armenians Who Were Killed in Turkey. 400 Tons Of Bones Were Transferred to France for Industrial ‘Use’

Thinking Humanity
November 2017
They Sold the Bones of Greeks And Armenians Who Were Killed in Turkey. 400 Tons Of Bones Were Transferred to France for Industrial ‘Use’

Asia Minor Catastrophe led to the death of thousands of people and the displacement of 1,5 million Greeks. One more crime made by Turks occurred two years later and had been unknown for years. The crime had to do with the selling of the bones of all the people who were slaughtered by Kemal’s Young Turks.

According to reports, Greeks’ bones were sold by Turks to French for industrial ‘use’! In total, 400 tons of human bones, which means the bones of 50.000 people, were transferred to the French industries in Marseilles. In 13th December 1924, the boat with the British flag arrived in Thessaloniki, Greece. When the workers in the port were informed of the bones, they didn’t allow the boat’s departure. Soon, there were demonstrations in the city from shocked refugees, who asked for the seizure of the shipment.

Finally, the English Consulate intervened, and the Greek government allowed the boat to depart so that there was no conflict with the British. The newspaper ‘Macedonia’ that was published on 14th December 1924 confirmed the arrival of the boat in Thessaloniki but didn’t mention the human bones the boat carried.

The same month, New York Times published the news with the following headline: “An unbelievable story of a shipment with human bones.” Also, the French newspaper Midi published the news, mentioning the human bones which were to be sold in Marseille.
Elias Venezis in his book Number 31328 mentions the process of collecting bones by people who were captured by Turks. When he was 18 years old, Venezis was captured with 3.000 people. He wrote the book after he returned from the East, to describe the hardships he and other captives went through after the Asia Minor Catastrophe.
In the book’s prologue, he wrote: “There’s nothing deeper and holier than a body in pain. This book is dedicated to this pain.”

Israel’s Unknown Heroic Spies of World War I

AISH.com
Nov 2017
Israel’s Unknown Heroic Spies of World War I
by Dr. Yvette Alt Miller

, marks Armistice day, the anniversary of the end of World War I.That bloody conflict drew to a close as Winston Churchill famously described, at 11am, the Eleventh Hour of the Eleventh Day of the Eleventh Month in 1918.

Amid the ceremonies marking this day around the globe, few, if any, will remember the courageous band of Jewish spies who formed the top-secret organization NILI, based in the Israeli town of Zichron Yaakov, who spied for Britain during the War. British intelligence official Baron William Ormsby-Gore said that NILI was “admittedly the most valuable nucleus of our intelligence in Palestine during the war.” A secret letter thanking the NILI network acknowledged that Britain could not have won the War without the aid of the NILI spies.

The heroes who made up NILI are all but forgotten. As we recall World War I a century later, let’s reclaim the legacy of the Jews of NILI and proclaim their decisive contribution to the Allied victory to the world.

The story of the NILI spy ring begins in Zichron Yaakov, a town settled by Jewish immigrants from Romania in 1882. They were part of a group of idealistic Jews who were beginning to buy land in the Land of Israel, then controlled by the Ottoman Empire, and establish Jewish farms and towns. When Romania gained independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1878, it effectively stripped most of its Jews from citizenship and began a system of anti-Semitic persecution. Many Romanian Jews fled to the United States. Others turned to the Land of Israel as a haven.

Life wasn’t easy for these idealistic, young Zionists. Historian Howard M. Sachar writes, “Eaten alive…by flies, periodically robbed of their livestock by Bedouins, the settlers and their families quickly began to wilt under disease, heat, and sheer exhaustion.”

Edmond de Rothschild, the ennobled French Jew who had amassed a fortune in banking, supported the struggling Jewish towns and farms. Zichron Yaakov is named for Edmund de Rothschild’s father, Jacob. (Zichron Yaakov means “memory of Jacob” in Hebrew.)

A hundred Jewish families moved from Romania to Zichron Yaakov in the 1880s. Among these were Ephraim and Malkah Aaronsohn and their six children.

One of the Aaronsohn’s sons, Aaron, became one of the world’s foremost agronomists. In 1906, he discovered the genetic forebear of wheat and in 1909 he established the Jewish Agricultural Experiment Station, where he experimented with adapting new growth to the arid conditions of the Middle East. A passionate Zionist, he travelled the world, explaining to people how Jewish farmers were transforming the Land of Israel, making the desert bloom.

Aaron was often assisted by his younger sister Sarah, an exceptional woman who spoke Hebrew, Yiddish, Turkish, French, Arabic and English.

Sarah Aaronsohn

In 1914, Sarah married an older man, a Jewish immigrant from Bulgaria, and moved with him to Istanbul. The marriage was an unhappy one, and the following year, as Turkey was in the midst of fighting in World War I alongside Germany, Sarah left her husband and travelled home by train to Zichron Yaakov.

The sights that Sarah saw from her train carriage as it moved through the Ottoman countryside horrified her. Ottoman Turks were in the midst of conducting what would be known as the Armenian Genocide, which saw the murder of one million men, women and children during World War I. Sarah later described seeing hundreds of bodies being loaded onto trains, and witnessing the brutal murder of up to 5,000 Armenians, whose bodies were then piled in a pyramid with kindling, and set on fire.

Aaron Aaronsohn

The Ottoman Turks who administered the Land of Israel made no secret of their hatred of Jews, and Sarah feared that the genocide she’d witnessed against the Armenians of the Ottoman Empire would next be directed against Jews if the Ottomans won the war. When she returned to Zichron Yaakov, she was determined to do all she could to aid Great Britain, which was fighting Ottoman Forces across the Middle East.

With the outbreak of World War I in 1914, the Ottoman Empire had joined with the Central Powers – Germany and Austria – to fight the allies, led by Britain and France. The Jews living in the Land of Israel, which was then under Ottoman rule, found themselves the target of anti-Semitism. The Ottoman Empire ruled that Jews and Christians must be drafted to fight – or else pay ruinous taxes to be exempted from military service.

In 1914, Sultan Mehmed V announced that that the Ottoman Empire was joining the Great War – and also declared that this was a jihad, a religious war against non-Muslims as well. As historian Eugene Rogan recounts, “On 14 November … the call for holy war (was) read out in public to a large crowd gathered outside the Mosque of Mehmed the Conqueror in the sultan’s name. The crowd roared its support.”

Inside the Jewish settlements, panic ensued. Were the Jews, like the Ottoman Empire’s Armenians and other minorities, going to become target of hate and violence?

The Aaronsohns decided to do what they could to support Britain in the war against the Turkish Ottomans. They founded a secret group, aided by their brother-in-law Avshalom Feinberg and close friend Joseph Lishansky. About 40 other young Jews joined the group, which was dubbed NILI, an acronym for the Biblical phrase Netzah Yisrael Lo Yeshaker, The Eternal One of Israel does not lie (Samuel I 15:29).

Sarah Aaronsohn and Avshalom Feinberg, 1916

NILI wanted to help Britain invade the Land of Israel from their bases in Egypt, but at first British forces rebuffed NILI’s top-secret overtures. Finally, in late 1916, Aaron Aaronsohn managed to cross Turkish lines and traversed the Sinai Peninsula to reach Cairo, and convince British forces there to trust the Jewish spy ring.

Sarah took over leadership of NILI. Together, the spies of NILI gathered intelligence on Turkish troop movements, fortifications, railroads, water locations, troop movements, and weather patterns. Sarah encoded messages and communicated with British headquarters by sending secret codes to the British warship Managam anchored off the coast of Palestine every two weeks. At first, the NILI spies used light signals to convey information to the ship.

When British troops stopped sending the frigate to pick up NILI’s messages, the Jewish spies used homing pigeons, sending Britain’s General Edmund Allenby valuable information that would enable him to traverse the Negev Desert and attack Turkish troops in Beersheva.

NILI also received funds from supporters in America and helped distribute money to the Jews in Ottoman-controlled Israel who were near starvation due to Turkish anti-Semitic policies and ruinous taxes on the Jewish community. The Ottoman forces had no idea that Sarah was leading the Middle East’s largest spy ring.

In September 1918, one of NILI’s homing pigeons landed on a house belonging to the Turkish governor of Caesarea. Ottoman officials found the message the bird carried and decoded it, realizing that a large pro-British spying ring was operating with impunity somewhere in northern Israel. They made finding the spy ring’s members and leaders their priority.

One by one, Ottoman forces rounded up members of the NILI spy ring, using torture to extract information about other members. Finally, on October 1, 2017, Sarah Aaronsohn was arrested and taken to a makeshift Turkish prison in Zichron Yaakov. For several days, she watched her father being tortured. Then she was brutally tortured herself. Drawing on near-superhuman reserves of strength, Sarah refused to divulge information about NILI. Instead, she taunted her captors, assuring them they would lose the war and be punished for their oppression of Jews and their massacre of Armenians.

Betar Jewish youth movement salutes at Sarah Aaronsohn’s grave in Zichron Yaakov, circa 1942

After nearly a week of agony, Sarah was informed that she would be transferred to prison in Damascus where she would face even greater torture. She asked if she could be allowed to visit her family home one last time to bathe and change her clothes. Early one morning, as most of Zichron Yaakov slept, Sarah was led down the town’s main street to her family home, which stood abandoned, its inhabitants imprisoned. As Sarah walked, she sang a song about a little bird that flies away. This was no innocent tune; it was her final signal to her surviving NILI comrades that the ring was broken and they were to cease any further activity in order to save themselves.

Once in the house, Sarah opened a secret compartment in a wall and retrieved a hidden handgun. Concealing the gun in the folds of her dress, she entered the bathroom and turned on the water. She scribbled a hasty note, tossed it out of the window and then shot herself in the mouth. Instead of dying instantly, she lingered for three excruciating days before passing away on October 10, 1918.

On December 11, 1918, British troops entered Jerusalem. Just weeks earlier, Britain had issued the landmark Balfour Declaration, throwing its support behind the establishment of a Jewish state in the ancient Land of Israel.

Ten months later, after brutal fighting, the Ottoman Turks finally surrendered to Britain near Megiddo, ending 400 years of Ottoman rule over the Land of Israel.

The Aaronsohn House in Zichron Yaakov

Today, Baron William Ormsby-Gore’s letter acknowledging that Britain could not have won without the aid of the NILI spies and other artifacts are held in a small museum commemorating NILI spies in Zichron Yaakov. Also there is the last letter that Sarah Aaronsohn wrote, moments before she shot herself. In it, she asks us to “describe all our suffering to those who shall come after we have passed away, and tell them about our martyrdom and let them know that Sarah has asked that each drop of blood be avenged….”

As we commemorate the Allies’ victory in World War I nearly a century ago, let’s heed her words and restore the name of the valiant NILI spy ring to our memories of the Great War.

For more information, read Spies in Palestine: Love, Betrayal and the Heroic Life of Sarah Aaronsohn, by James Strodes.



North–South Transport Corridor: Russia Wins, Armenia Loses

The Jamestown Foundation
Nov 9 2017


A long-proposed alternative to the western Caspian (or Azerbaijani) route within the NSTC is the Armenian-Iranian rail link, also known as the South Armenian Railway, which would connect Iran’s Bandar Abbas port to the Black Sea and Russia through Armenia and Georgia (Regnum, October 17, 2016; Civilnet.am March 23, 2017; EurAsia Daily, January 13, 2016; Ritmeurasia.org, February 17, 2016). However, since Baku is a crossing point for both North–South and East–West transcontinental transport corridors currently under development, Azerbaijan has gained a great opportunity to synergize the Russia–Azerbaijan–Iran railway with the just inaugurated Baku–Tbilisi–Kars (BTK) railroad, which is part of the East–West “Silk Road” corridor from China to Europe. Indeed, President Aliyev pointedly mentioned last month that the two transport corridors would be integrated (President.az, October 30, 2017). Such synergy of the North–South and East–West transport infrastructures rules out any prospects for the South Armenian Railway. This effectively puts an end to Armenia’s ambitions to become a regional transit country and adversely affects it politically as well as economically. Yet, Armenia’s closest ally, Russia, has essentially been unsupportive of Yerevan’s position on this issue. Why?

First, the Azerbaijani route will solidify the blockade on Armenia implemented by Azerbaijan and Turkey due to the Karabakh conflict. And the more isolated Armenia is, the more dependent on Russia it becomes. Indeed, a major rationale for the Armenian-Iranian railway was to subvert the blockade of Armenia while simultaneously reducing its dependence on Russia. This reasoning also explains why the United States was not opposed to the construction of a rail line linking its regional adversary Iran with Armenia, which is home to Russian military bases (see EDM, January 30).

The second basis for Russia’s indifference is the fact that the choice of the Azerbaijani route over the Armenian-Iranian railway will seriously undermine Yerevan’s attempts to build closer relations with Tehran independent of Moscow. It will also prevent Armenia from developing stronger transport connectivity with Europe as well as Georgia. As noted above, the Armenian-Iranian route would have continued northward into Georgia, which is politically at odds with Russia (Jam-news.net, February 28).

Third, at a cost of around $3.5 billion, the South Armenian Railway is not commercially viable (Newsarmenia.am, October 31). This sum is close to Armenia’s entire state budget. Yerevan has no prospects to finance the Iranian-Armenian railway on its own, while Baku has agreed to fund the $500 million still needed for the completion of the missing railway segment of the NSTC. In 2015, the president of Russian Railways made it clear that Moscow was not interested in the South Armenian Railway project, calling it “commercially unviable” (Azatutyun.am, June 9, 2015; Arka.am, January 19, 2016).

Russia’s current position on the business sense of building the South Armenian Railway sharply contradicts its policy from years earlier—before Armenia was as closely tied (politically and economically) to Russia as it is today. Back in 2008, Moscow had in fact assured Yerevan that it would participate in the implementation of the Iranian-Armenian rail link (Asbarez.com, November 14, 2008). At that time, the Russian Railways company took over Armenian Railways in a 30-year deal, which is extendable by another 20 years. Moreover, the proposed railroad was apparently on the agenda of the Armenian and Russian presidents’ Moscow meeting on September 3, 2013. Right after this, President Serzh Sargsyan announced Armenia’s decision to abandon the association agreement being negotiated with the European Union and declared his country’s intention to join the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union (News.am, September 3, 2013 Arovat-ru.am, February 27, 2016; Jam-news.net, March 13, 2017).

Fourth, by supporting the Azerbaijani route, Moscow also aims to neutralize Chinese intentions to help fund the Iranian-Armenian railway to serve the One Belt, One Road project (Armenpress.am, November 16, 2015). The South Armenian Railway and China’s involvement in bringing it to fruition would have pulled Armenia out of Russia’s exclusive control. President Sargsyan had publicly stated that this project would lead to a stronger Chinese presence in the South Caucasus, something Moscow obviously would not like to see.

Last but not least, the Azerbaijani route will provide Russia with faster, easier and cheaper direct railway access to Iran as well as an overland passage to the Gulf and the Middle East. Due to Russia’s role in the Syrian conflict, burgeoning partnership and trade with Iran, and rising relations with Iraq, this railway connection can serve Moscow’s interest to project power into the region. Indeed, Russia’s attempted involvement in the recent Qatari-Saudi rift illustrates that Moscow is seeking a stronger presence in the Gulf region (see EDM, June 12). Iran’s Bandar Abbas port—the other end of the NSTC link—provides easier passage to Qatar and other Gulf countries for Russian goods.

Many in Armenia feel betrayed by Russia due to the effective failure of the Iranian-Armenian railway project. Yerevan has repeatedly counted on Moscow’s political support or economic backing for various regional initiatives, only to be disappointed. Ultimately, it seems, Armenia is simply too small to sacrifice Russian interests for (see EDM, April 14, 2016; February 13, 2017). This disconnect, however, has yet to fully register for the Armenian ruling elite (see EDM, July 27, September 8). And the reality is, Yerevan’s stubbornness on the Karabakh conflict has made the economy of Armenia and the prosperity of its people hostage to unrealistic ambitions for more than 25 years.

Film Review: ‘Intent to Destroy: Death, Denial & Depiction’

Variety Magazine
Nov 10 2017
Director: Joe Berlinger
Cast: Terry George, Atom Egoyan, Eric Bogosian
Release Date: Nov 10, 2017
1 hour 55 minutes   
Official Site: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6794462/ 

Perhaps the surest proof of Winston Churchill’s theorem that “history is written by the victors” comes from none other than Adolf Hitler: “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?” the German Fuhrer said by way of a chilling corollary, effectively paving the way for the most insidious ethnic cleansing of the modern era. Between 1915 and 1918, an estimated 1.5 million Armenians living in Ottoman Turkey had been rounded up and either marched to their deaths or murdered outright.

But “history” — as in the public study of past events, and the way they are positioned and discussed by society at large — has been ambiguous about the Armenian Genocide. Even that label is a point of contention among contemporary Turks, who resist the “G word” (coined in 1944 by Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin to describe Germany’s systematic murder of Jewish citizens) as a legal definition that, they say, should not retroactively apply to conflicts in their own past — conflicts which time has given those now in power plenty of time to obscure, re-write or otherwise justify.

Several years ago, Berlinger was approached by a wealthy Armenian producer about making a straightforward nonfiction film about the genocide, which he declined. But a few months later, after getting wind that a massive, Kirk Kerkorian-backed feature film called “The Promise” was underway, a light went off: Berlinger pitched the idea of “embedding” himself with the production — a first-of-its-kind, blockbuster-scale independent film about the Armenian Genocide, conceived as “Doctor Zhivago” set against the horrific backdrop of Turkish atrocity.

Except “The Promise” never lived up to its promise. While well cast (with the likes of Oscar Isaac and Christian Bale) and respectably overseen by “Hotel Rwanda” helmer Terry George, the film muddies its history with melodrama, earning back just $8.2 million of its estimated $90 million budget. That meant Berlinger’s film — which plays like a glossy DVD extra at times — had a problem. As a broader look at the Armenian Genocide, it has the classiest recreation footage imaginable (clips from “The Promise,” paired with voiceover from a pre-production table read); but as a vérité record of a landmark film production … well, “The Promise” was a bust. And bizarrely enough, Berlinger ignores most of what might be interesting.

Why did George, Isaac and Bale agree to make the film? Were they personally invested in the subject, or was this just an opportunistic paycheck for them? And considering the enormous pushback anything that remotely touches on the Armenian Genocide receives from all fronts, where is the Turkish pushback on “The Promise”? (I speak from experience, since no subject generates more hate mail and threats — a lesson I learned when reviewing the documentary “Screamers” about Armenian band System of a Down during my first days at Variety.

In addition to reminding that the plight of persecuted Armenians was one of America’s top causes in the first quarter of the 20th century, Berlinger reveals through telegrams and evidence how Robert P. Skinner, U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, succeeded in pressuring MGM (via the State Department) into scrapping an adaptation of “The Forty Days of Musa Dagh” in 1935 (the same battle inspired the climax of “The Promise”). But the closest anyone in “Intent to Destroy” comes to suggesting similar obstacles is when a crew member claims that no one even considered shooting the film in Turkey — whereas revisionist counter-salvo “The Ottoman Lieutenant,” starring Josh Hartnett (a 2017 release never mentioned here), took full advantage of Turkish locations.

Still, there are hints of conflict (check the IMDb page for “The Promise,” and you can see how an organized group of Turks has succeeded in sabotaging the movie’s user score), reflected in a paranoid on-set interview with actor Daniel Giménez Cacho, who reveals how the Turkish ambassador supplied him with a book called “Turks and Armenians” by controversial historian — and vocal genocide refuter — Justin McCarthy, whom Berlinger invites to share his position in the film. However “balanced” that decision may seem, the trouble with giving airtime to denialists is that it introduces doubt into the discussion of world events, suggesting that there can be “two sides” to any issue — which in this case, typically comes with a “they started it”-style justification, in which Armenian Christians are accused of conspiring with Russians and acting like terrorists against Turkish Muslims, effectively necessitating their own exile and extermination. (Trust me, the Turkish “side” is adequately represented elsewhere, taught as history and publicly reinforced by the country’s political advantage on the world stage, strong-arming even U.S. presidents and ambassadors into submission — including former diplomat John Marshall Evans, who was reprimanded and forced to make a public retraction after publicly using the word “genocide,” but allowed to speak his mind freely here.)

Whereas the documentary material related to “The Promise” looks good, but adds little (apart from a congratulatory behind-the-scenes souvenir for all involved in the production), interviews with director Atom Egoyan paint a different picture about the making of his 2002 film “Ararat.” In the film’s most eloquent interview, Egoyan candidly explains how Turkish activists attempted to intimidate him into abandoning the project. Like “The Promise,” “Ararat” also would have been more powerful if only it were a better film, although it shares Berlinger’s interest in the challenges, borth artistic and political, in depicting such an event.

Film Review: ‘Intent to Destroy: Death, Denial & Depiction’

Reviewed online, Los Angeles, Nov. 8, 2017. Running time: 115 MIN.

Production: An Abramorama release, presented with Survival Pictures, of a RadicalMedia, Third Eye Motion Picture Co. production, in association Bloom Project. Producers: Eric Esrailian, Chip Rosenbloom, Joe Berlinger. Executive producers: Anthony Mandekic, Patricia L. Glaser, Dan Taylor, Sheri Sani, Jon Kamen, Dave O’Connor, Justin Wilkes. Director: Joe Berlinger. Writers: Berlinger, Cy Christiansen. Camera (color/B&W): Bob Richman. Editor: Christiansen. Music: Serj Tankian.

With: Terry George, Atom Egoyan, Eric Bogosian