Wednesday, Russia's Ties With Armenia `Unhurt' By Arms Sales To Azerbaijan . Astghik Bedevian Russia -- A "TOS-1 Buratino" multiple rocket launcher fires during the "Russia Arms Expo 2013" 9th international exhibition of arms, military equipment and ammunition, in the Urals city of Nizhny Tagil, September 25, 2013 A senior Armenian official on Wednesday criticized continuing Russian arms sales to Azerbaijan but made clear that they will not undermine Armenia's close military ties with Russia. "Azerbaijan is not the kind of state that can be supplied with weapons because weapons ought to be sold to those countries that aim to use them for self-defense. I hope that everyone will agree with this over time," said deputy parliament speaker Eduard Sharmazanov, who is also the chief spokesman for the ruling Republican Party of Armenia (HHK). "On the other hand, this must not impede the deepening of Russian-Armenian strategic military-political relations," Sharmazanov told reporters. "They must not be conditioned only by Russian-Azerbaijani relations. Russian-Armenian relations are deeper and stem from the interests of the two countries." Russia has sold around $5 billion worth of tanks, artillery systems and other weapons to Azerbaijan in line with defense contracts mostly signed in 2009-2011. The arms supplies continued even after Armenian leaders strongly criticized them following Azerbaijan's April 2016 offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh. According to the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, the Russians shipped six heavy artillery systems to the Azerbaijani military last year. Late last month, a Russian cargo ship delivered a new batch of anti-tank missile systems to Baku's Caspian Sea port. And earlier this week, Azerbaijan's Defense Ministry announced that it has received hundreds of Russian thermobaric rockets for TOS-1A multiple-launch systems which it had purchased from Moscow earlier. Russian President Vladimir Putin defended the lucrative arms deals with Baku after holding talks with his Armenian counterpart Serzh Sarkisian in Moscow last August. Putin implied that oil-rich Azerbaijan could have bought offensive weapons from other nations. He also argued that Russia has long been providing substantial military aid to Armenia. The Armenia army demonstrated new weapons recently acquired from Russia during a September 2016 military parade in Yerevan. Those included state-of-the-art Iskander ballistic missiles. Russia has been Armenia's principal supplier of weapons and ammunition owing to the military alliance between the two nations. Yerevan has received Russian weapons at discounted prices or even for free. Yerevan Hopes For Russian-Georgian Transport Deal . Sargis Harutyunyan Georgia -- A warning sign is pictured behind a wire barricade erected by Russian and South Ossetian troops along Georgia's de-facto border with its breakaway region of South Ossetia in the village of Khurvaleti, July 14, 2015 Transport Minister Vahan Martirosian expressed hope on Wednesday that Russia and Georgia will agree after all to open new transport corridors that would facilitate Armenia's foreign trade. Senior Russian and Georgian diplomats have been discussing the possibility of reviving a 2011 agreement meant to enable their countries to maintain commercial ties in the absence of diplomatic relations. They have specifically looked into modalities of reopening two highways that used to connect Georgia to Russia via the breakaway Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The two sides would hire a Swiss company to operate customs checkpoints to be set up on the administrative boundaries of the two territories controversially recognized by Russia as independent states. The Moscow daily "Kommersant" reported this week that they finalized such a deal at the latest round of negotiations held in Prague. The Georgian government has not officially confirmed this yet. Commenting on the report, Martirosian said: "That depends, first and foremost, on Russian-Georgian relations. We hope that a solution will be found in the near future." The minister told reporters that the new Russian-Georgian corridors would benefit Armenia by reducing transportation costs in its trade with Russia, its number one trading partner, and other states. Most of Russian-Armenian trade is currently carried out through the sole Russian-Georgian border crossing at Upper Lars. Traffic along that mountainous road is frequently blocked by blizzards in winter months. Hence, Yerevan's strong interest in the launch of new trade routes to Russia. Armenian Prime Minister Karen Karapetian discussed the matter with his Georgian counterpart Giorgi Kvirikashvili when he visited Tbilisi in February. Karapetian said after their talks that "there will be an alternative to the Lars road" but did not give details. Karabakh Leader Faces Reelection Challenge From Opposition . Hovannes Movsisian Nagorno-Karabakh - The parliament building in Stepanakert, 2Sep2016. An opposition member of Nagorno-Karabakh's parliament announced on Wednesday his candidacy for the post of the unrecognized republic's next, interim president that will be elected by local lawmakers later this month. Eduard Aghabekian, a former mayor of Stepanakert, thus challenged Karabakh President Bako Sahakian's controversial plans to extend his rule by at least three years. Aghabekian accused Sahakian's administration of failing to address economic and security challenges facing the Armenian-populated territory. In line with a new constitution enacted in a referendum in February, Karabakh will switch to the presidential system of government which will lead to the abolition of the post of prime minister. The authorities in Stepanakert say the constitutional change will put Karabakh in a better position to cope with the unresolved conflict with Azerbaijan. Their opponents maintain, however, Sahakian is simply keen to stay in power after he completes his second and what was supposed to be final five-year term in September 2017. The new constitution will fully come into force after the current parliament dominated by Sahakian's supporters serves out its term in 2020.Karabakh will be governed by an interim president chosen by the parliament until then. Three pro-government parties holding the vast majority of parliament seats have already decided to back Sahakian's reelection. The largest of those parties, Free Fatherland, is led by Ara Harutiunian, the Karabakh prime minister. Another senior Free Fatherland figure, Artur Tovmasian, defended Sahakian's track record, pointing to high rates of economic growth recorded by the Karabakh authorities. He said Sahakian has pledged to ensure that the local economy expands by around 10 percent annually for the next three years. "If there are candidates who think that a growth rate of up to 50 percent is possible in Karabakh then it's absurd," Tovmasian told RFE/RL's Armenian service (Azatutyun.am). Aghabekian's Movement-88 party holds only three parliament seats, compared with 28 seats controlled by Free Fatherand and the two other pro-government groups: the Democratic Party of Artsakh and the Karabakh branch of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun). Sahakian's challenger may also be backed by Hayk Khanumian, the holder of another opposition party's sole parliament seat. "I personally have a positive attitude towards Aghabekian but believe that he stands no chance of getting elected," Khanumian said on Wednesday. Aghabekian admitted that he is unlikely to unseat Sahakian. He said he is primarily challenging the Karabakh leader in order to draw public attention to Karabakh's lingering problems. Press Review "Aravot" claims that Azerbaijan seems to have failed to achieve "political and propaganda results" with its "provocative" actions taken on the Karabakh frontlines this month. "They have failed to prove their legend about `bloody-thirsty Armenians,'" writes the paper. One of the reasons for that, it says, is a glaring contradiction between Baku's declared commitment to peace and regular threats to win back not only Karabakh but also "historical Azerbaijani lands" in Armenia proper. The paper also points to apparent problems that have emerged in Azerbaijan's relationship with Russia. "Analysts believe the reason for their differences is competition over gas, an area where the interests of these two countries do not converge," it says. "Who will be Armenia's prime minister after 2018? This is the number one issue on the Armenian political agenda at the moment," writes "Hayots Ashkhar." The pro-presidential paper disapproves of the opposition Yelk alliance's growing efforts to bring up this matter on the parliament floor. It says that instead of discussing President Serzh Sarkisian's political future, Yelk and other opposition forces should seek to "impose their own agenda" on the country's rulers. "The country is faced with unprecedented external and internal challenges, and in this situation the opposition # is bothering with changes that will occur within the ruling elite in 2018," it says. "Haykakan Zhamanak" reacts to reports that Russia and Georgia have finalized a deal to open transport corridors through South Ossetia and Abkhazia. "This is an extremely important development for Armenia," comments the paper. "The thing is that the only road currently connecting Armenia to Russia passes through the Upper Lars [mountain pass,] which is causing our entrepreneurs considerable damage. If Russia's and Georgia's representatives indeed reached a final and irreversible agreement, then Armenia will get a very convenient, reliable and short overland link to Russia." (Tigran Avetisian) Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL Copyright (c) 2017 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc. 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036. www.rferl.org
Category: 2017
Armenia-Singapore air communication to be regulated
An intergovernmental agreement on air communication between Armenia and Singapore was signed Wednesday.
The document was signed along the lines of the visit to Singapore by the head of the General Department of Civil Aviation of Armenia, Sergey Avetisyan.
This agreement will contribute to a proper legal regulation of Armenia-Singapore relations in the aviation sector.
The Spandaryan-Kechut water tunnel, put into operation in 2004, has not transported even one liter of water to Lake Sevan. ЧБХ
Dear media,please publishnext tothe articlekeeping all active links (hyperlinks).
Armenian Environmental Front (AEF) Civil Initiative
Address: Yerevan, Spendiaryan 5, apt. 24:00
Address: 5 Spendiaryan str. apt. 24, Yerevan, Armenia
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Karabakh MOD: Defense army is ready to take offensive actions if needed
STEPANAKERT. – The Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic/NKR) Defense Minister and Defense Army Commander, Levon Mnatsakanyan, on Wednesday received a group of MPs from the National Assembly of Armenia.
At their request, he reflected on the military actions that occurred in April of the year past, and assessed them as Azerbaijan’s massive attack against Artsakh, the NKR Ministry of Defense informed Armenian News-NEWS.am. Subsequently, Mnatsakanyan spoke about the activities being carried out since these hostilities.
And assessing the present-day situation at the frontline as stably controlled, he assured that the Artsakh defense army is capable of responding adequately to the adversary’s provocations and ready to also take offensive actions consistent with the situation.
Armenian lawmaker: Azerbaijan not a country to sell weapons to
YEREVAN. – The Armenian side repeatedly expressed its opinion on Russia’s arms sales to Azerbaijan, deputy speaker of the Armenian parliament said.
Eduard Sharmazanov said discontent was expressed even during meetings with Russian colleagues.
“My opinion has not changed. Azerbaijan is not a state to which one can sell arms. It can be sold to those who defend,” said the deputy speaker.
At the same time, Sharmazanov believes, this should not hinder the deepening of political and military-political cooperation between Armenia and Russia.
“Armenia and Russia are implementing the provisions envisaged by the agreement. Relations between Armenia and Russia should not be conditioned by this,” he added.
What did Armenia, Azerbaijan FMs discuss?
YEREVAN. – A meeting between Edward Nalbandian and Elmar Mammadyarov, Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan, took place Tuesday in Brussels, at the initiative and presence of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs Igor Popov, Stéphane Visconti and Richard Hoagland, and which was attended by Andrzej Kasprzyk, the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office.
During the meeting discussions were held on the modalities of advancement of the Nagorno-Karabakh negotiating process, press service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Armenia informed Armenian News-NEWS.am.
Nalbandian underscored the importance of stabilization of the situation on the Line of Contact, and, in this regard, emphasized the necessity to implement the agreements reached during the Vienna and St. Petersburg Summits.
The Co-Chairs asked the ministers to convey to the presidents their proposal on organizing a summit in the course of this year.
An agreement was reached to convene the next meeting between the ministers in September in New York, in the margins of the General Assembly of the United Nations.
CSTO Secretary General Khachaturov to address at Russia State Duma
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) Secretary General Yuri Khachaturov on Thursday will deliver an address at the Russian State Duma committee for the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), the CSTO official website informed on Wednesday.
In his remarks, Khachaturov will speak about the priorities of this organization, and the preparations for the upcoming meeting of its parliamentary assembly.
The Collective Security Treaty Organization comprises Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan.
Turkey writer: Armenian Genocide denial is equal to losing own dignity
YEREVAN. – Yerevan is a beautiful city, stated Turkish writer and publicist Zeynel Abidin Kızılyaprak, at Wednesday’s press conference in the capital city of Armenia.
He has arrived in Armenia within the framework of the “Let’s Overcome Boundaries” journalists’ program by the Hrant Dink Foundation.
“I’m happy that the media and the NGOs in Armenia ‘hold their hands on the pulse,’” Kızılyaprak stressed. “I’m in the country of the people that survived genocide. I want to respect myself. Man loses dignity when he denies the fact of genocide, doesn’t call it like it is.”
Addressing Turkey—and the Turkish state, first and foremost—he added that respect needs to be earned and that the rest is secondary.
Also, Zeynel Abidin Kızılyaprak pointed to the development trends of Turkish society.
“The new [Turkish] generation is very different [than the older generation],” he concluded. “It sees the world, travels.”
‘Serzh Sargsyan is my military fellow, will remain my military fellow, it is an axiom, you understand?’ Sasun Mikaelyan
“Yelq” bloc boycotted and did not partake in the first session of the newly formed National Assembly, during Serzh Sargsyan’s and Catholicos’ speeches until Serzh Sargsyan left. And during Yerevan City Mayor Taron Margaryan’s inauguration day Serzh Sargsyan similarly made a speech and “Yelq” decided to participate, not to boycott. If the principle was that you boycott Serzh Sargsyan’s speech, why did you do that in the Parliament and not in the Municipality? To this question, “Yelq” bloc MP Sasun Mikaelyan answered: “Was “Yelq” present in the Municipality? I am not informed. Well, the Parliament is a little bit another tribune.”
Asked whether he neglects the case of the Municipality, Sasun Mikaelyan replied: “No, I do not neglect, but we have expressed our viewpoint from this common high tribune. I have told then as well, that this has somehow been a step of a discontent. I personally, would have not participated, forasmuch as we have seen in these years…”
Asked why he would have not participated, whether he disliked Serzh Sargsyan that much, Sasun Mikaelyan replied: “Serzh Sargsyan is my military fellow, will remain, my military fellow, it is an axiom, you understand? Another path we have passed together. But it does not mean that from the political standpoint, we should not do that, leave the principles.”
Hripsime JEBEJYAN
Edward Nalbandian: As long as Azerbaijan fails to respect its international commitments Baku bears full responsibility for all consequences
Statement by H.E. Mr. Edward Nalbandian, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of the OSCE
“Building trust through dialogue and cooperation”
Mr. Chairman,
Dear Colleagues,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I would like to thank the Austrian Chairmanship and particularly Minister Sebastian Kurz for organizing this informal Ministerial discussion.
Joining efforts with a view to overcoming distrust and increasing confidence is enshrined in the birth certificate of this Organization, while dialogue and cooperation have been long identified as the instruments for achieving our common goals. We appreciate the Chairmanship’s initiative to once again apply to the foundations of the OSCE, since neither dialogue, nor cooperation can be taken as granted nowadays. We hope that this kind of discussions can contribute to reviving the true spirit of cooperation, being mindful that the most noticeable accomplishments of the OSCE have been secured through dialogue and compromise, political will and good faith.
The setbacks of our cooperation and erosion of trust do not merely limit to the existing disagreements on number of areas. Here we refer also to the abuse of the principle of consensus, the consequences of which go far beyond from damaging the trust, especially in the cases where there is none, but rather shaking the very essence of the OSCE which is designed to solve the issues through dialogue and cooperation and never through imposing the position of one participating State at the expense of all others and the entire Organization. Thus, the refusal of Azerbaijan to join the consensus on the extension of the mandate of the OSCE Office in Yerevan damages not merely the integrity of the field missions of the OSCE but its capacity of inclusive cooperation in implementing the commitments. Azerbaijan failed to respect the OSCE commitments back home and eliminated the OSCE Office in its own country before it attacked and closed the OSCE last assets in the region.
The violation and abuse of shared norms and principles do not happen in a vacuum. It does not come as a surprise that this participating State found itself alone and in isolation in challenging the OSCE Office in Yerevan.
Ladies and gentlemen,
The dire record of Azerbaijan’s noncompliance encompasses all three dimensions of the OSCE. The leadership of Azerbaijan uses every opportunity to boast about multiculturalism allegedly cultivated by them. In reality thousands masterpieces of Armenian cultural and historic heritage, sacred sites, churches, monasteries, cross stones destroyed and erased by Azerbaijan testify to the contrary. The 2016 report of the European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance states: “Political leaders, educational institutions and media have continued using hate speech against Armenians; an entire generation of Azerbaijanis has now grown up listening to this hateful rhetoric”. It is this generation raised in the environment of such propaganda that again and again commits despicable crimes. How could the leadership of Baku talk about multiculturalism at the same time declaring that “all Armenians of the world are number one enemies of Azerbaijan”? Probably it considers this to be part of Baku’s self-proclaimed “intelligent power”. There is nothing smart in trying to mislead the international community, especially those countries that do not have, difficulty to find out the truth, to warn their citizens of the Armenian origin to avoid visiting Azerbaijan, where they will be subjected to outrageous racist discriminating practice on the basis of their ethnicity.
Mr. Chairman,
In April 2016 Azerbaijan unleashed a large scale aggression against Nagorno-Karabakh that was accompanied by the grave violations of international humanitarian law, atrocities against the civilian population, including children, women and elderly persons, mutilation of the bodies, Daesh-style beheadings, which have been condemned by international community.
The OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair countries initiated Summits in Vienna and St. Petersburg aimed at overcoming the consequences of Azerbaijan’s aggression as well as at creating conducive conditions for the advancement of the negotiation process.
During the Vienna Summit it was particularly agreed upon and then reconfirmed in St. Petersburg to establish the OSCE mechanism for investigation of the ceasefire violations; to increase the number and enhance the capacity of the OSCE monitors on the line of contact between Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan, and on the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The commitment on the exclusively peaceful settlement of the conflict was reiterated, the strict adherence to the 1994-1995 ceasefire agreements was emphasised.
Trust and confidence are built when agreements are implemented. With this understanding Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh gave their consents to implement the mentioned high level agreements. Azerbaijan backtracked from those agreements as it had done with prior commitments many times before. This attitude of Azerbaijan questions its credibility for being a party to negotiations, which honours its agreements.
Ladies and gentlemen,
In the framework of the OSCE trust means first of all trust into Organization and its ability to address eminent security challenges in Europe. We firmly believe that based on the proposals of the Co-Chairs the OSCE should enhance its presence on the ground in the conflict zone on more permanent and stronger basis. In this respect the OSCE could help all parties to the conflict to respect ceasefire, avoid military escalation and build trust and confidence. The OSCE is an organization which was created on the lessons of history and history teaches us on many occasions that war is an outcome of misperception and miscalculation of security environment while peace is an outcome of trust. Azerbaijan has chosen a different path.
People on all sides of the conflict deserve to know who pushes them to the path of loss and suffering. Identifying the security threats in impartial and responsible manner is important for credibility of this Organization as well.
We took note that in their statement the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs identified Azerbaijan as a party who first resorted to the violence. This has been far not the first appeal of the Co-Chairs addressed directly to Azerbaijan. On previous occasions the Co-Chairs have made a number of clear cut statements calling Baku to refrain from the escalation of the situation, to reaffirm the commitment to peaceful settlement of the issue, to refrain from criticizing the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair countries and to respect their mandate, give up efforts to shift the conflict resolution to other formats, to agree to the establishment of investigation mechanism of ceasefire violations. In response to Azerbaijan’s claims that tried to question the validity of the ceasefire agreements of 1994 and 1995, the Co-Chairs clearly stated that these agreements have no time limitation and should be strictly adhered to.
However, Azerbaijan ignores all appeals of the Co-Chair countries and continues to stick to its highly destructive attitude at the negotiation table and provocative actions in the conflict zone.
On July 4th the Azerbaijani leadership once again resorted to the tactics of notorious terrorist organizations and as many times before used its civilian population as a human shield for shelling the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh by heavy weaponry, including by multiple rocket launcher systems. In response, the Defense Army of Nagorno-Karabakh was obliged to exercise self-defense against the aggressive actions of the Azerbaijani side. Baku clearly demonstrated that it is not capable to comprehend the appeals of the Co Chairs.
As long as Azerbaijan fails to respect its international commitments in compliance with 1994-1995 trilateral ceasefire agreements, refuses to implement the Vienna and St. Petersburg Summit commitments, especially on the creation of the mechanism for investigation of the ceasefire violations, that can become also a mechanism for prevention of escalation, Baku bears full responsibility for all consequences for such behaviour.
This stresses once again the imperative for the international community to consider more tangible means to curb Azerbaijan.
We are bound together to advance the cause of peace and security through the OSCE. We will continue to be actively involved in all efforts aimed at building cooperation, consent and trust in the OSCE area.
Thank you.