The Middle East: Spiritual Battlefield?

The Media Line, NY
Dec 27 2007

The Middle East: Spiritual Battlefield?

Written by Rachelle Kliger
Published Thursday, December 27, 2007

[Egypt] Under a woolen canopy, wisps of smoke from an outdoor
fireplace mix with the scent of tobacco and rose tea. Magdi, an
Egyptian Copt, nimbly rolls himself a cigarette. Sitting cross-legged
on the cushioned floor, he ponders out loud how it came to be that
all of his peers are happily married, while he is 32, good looking,
intelligent, well-off– and yet still painfully single.

The problem, he believes, is that his Christian religion limits his
options for finding a soul mate in Egypt.

`If I married a Muslim girl my mother would kill me,’ he says. `If it
was a Jewish girl, she wouldn’t mind so much. But a Muslim? Never.’

Magdi cannot quite explain his mother’s unyielding attitude. But her
attitude is typical of the prevailing feelings in this part of the
world. The antagonism between Muslims and Christians goes back a long
way, and the ever-present chasm between the two communities is
noticeable in every walk of life.

The enmity is not limited to Egypt. The slaying of a Christian
bookstore manager in Gaza in October marked a sad milestone in the
relations between Muslims and Christians in the Palestinian
territories.

Rami Ayyad was stabbed and shot to death after being accused by
Gaza-based Islamic groups of engaging in missionary activity.

Similar incidents occurred this year in Turkey, Afghanistan and Iraq.
A group of 31 suspected Al-Qa’ida members were charged in Lebanon
recently for plotting to bomb a church.

The list goes on. The Middle East is awash with religion-motivated
violence.

Today, as Middle Eastern Christians dwindle in numbers and cling to
their last vestiges, some are wondering whether Christians and
Muslims here are engaged in a battle over the survival of the
fittest.

Spiritual Warfare

Rev. Steven Khoury, head of the Calvary Baptist Ministries in Israel
and the Palestinian territories, says the tension between Muslims and
Christians is simmering beneath the surface. Paradoxically, he
believes it will explode when the political crises in the Middle East
are solved.

`Right now everybody — Muslims and Christians — is busy with
politics,’ Khoury says, tidying a pile of Arabic-language bibles at
his chapel in eastern Jerusalem.

`Once the politics settle down, I believe it’s going to turn into
more of a religious battle than a political battle.’

Once the politics are out of the picture, what remains will be
spiritual warfare and the religious communities will be left alone to
fight out their war to the bloody end, he predicts.

Not everyone agrees. `I’d resist the notion that there was a battle
between the two religions,’ says Prof. Gerald Hawting, a professor of
Middle Eastern history at the School of Oriental and African Studies
(SOAS).

>From the advent of Islam there has been a religious dispute between
local Christians and Muslims, but Hawting dismisses the notion that
battles between the Byzantines and the Muslims in the ninth and tenth
centuries, for example, were faith-based. Religion, he concedes, was
often used as a propaganda tool to arouse the soldiers, but was not
the main premise of the battle.

Crusades – A Quest for Earthly Gains?

And then came the crusades.

In the early crusades, Hawting says, the religious elements were very
strong.

`The Europeans feel they’re engaged in a religious venture and
they’re promised access to paradise if they’re killed in battle, and
forgiveness for their sins,’ he says.

But even in these early stages, there were other elements at play,
such as economic and political gain, and the crusades gradually
became more motivated by pragmatism.

`There’s a feudal system in Europe producing landless young men who
haven’t much future in Europe. So sending them off to conquer land in
the Middle East is a good way to keep them employed,’ Hawting says.

As time progressed, European cities developed trade interests in the
Middle East, and this, too, became an important motive.

Hawting does not believe the crusades is reason that Christians in
the Middle East are discriminated against today.

`I think it’s convenient for some Muslims to raise that, but I don’t
think the present difficulties between Christians and Muslims are to
do with that. It’s to do with the reassertion of Islam and in the
current situation. Local Christians are seen by some Muslims as a
possible fifth column who are loyal to someone from outside.’

Wilfred Wong, a researcher with the Jubilee Campaign, says many
Muslims in the Middle East have unofficially declared war on the
Christians in the region, partly because of the United States and
coalition forces fighting in Muslim countries.

Wong suggests that the Christians are wrongly perceived as being an
extension of the Western forces, causing resentment towards them from
many Muslims. The general increase in Islamic fundamentalism has also
caused many Muslims in the Middle East to become more intolerant and
resentful towards Christians and other non-Muslims living in their
midst, he adds.

Wong says Christians are not trying to take over.

`Some Muslims are leading a crusade against the Christians, who just
want to get on with their lives and stay in their ancient homeland.’

Persecution

Christians are a minority in the Middle East among a Muslim majority.
Historically, in states governed by Islamic law, Jews and Christians
were considered "People of the Book" and were given a special status
under Muslim rule known as "Dhimmi." They had fewer legal and social
rights than Muslims and were obligated to pay a tax known as jizya.
But their life, property and faith were protected.

Today, rights organizations talk about severe encroachments on
religious freedoms throughout the Middle East. Christians are often
the first to bear the brunt.

`We’ve lived with this discrimination for 1,400 years,’ says Nader
Fawzy, President of the Canada-based Middle East Christians
Association (MECA).

Contrary to Hawting, Fawzy believes the discrimination stems first
and foremost from the religious differences.

`They cut our tongues and burned our churches,’ he says. `The
discrimination has nothing to do with the government more than it has
to do with Islam.’

Nina Shea, director of the Center of Religious Freedom at the Hudson
Institute, says that while the attitude of the regimes toward
Christians in the Middle East varies from country to country,
generally their situation relative to many other minorities in this
part of the world, is bad.

The one positive exception, Shea notes, is in the Gulf states, where
religious tolerance has improved in places like Qatar and Bahrain.

But elsewhere, the pattern in which Jews were coerced into leaving
Muslim countries is now repeating itself with Christians. Countries
are going from a once-Christian majority to having no Christians at
all.

`And it’s accelerating,’ Shea says. `I think it’s a very dismal
picture.’

Not everyone paints such a bleak picture regarding Christian-Muslim
relations. Mitri Raheb, pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Christmas
Church in Bethlehem, says the main problem facing his community is
not the Muslims. The one to blame for the Christians’ situation is
Israel, because of its policies in the Palestinian territories, and
the West.

`I think the main problem is the interference of the West here,
militarily,’ Raheb says.

`This interference is not letting our region enjoy any stability.’

Raheb is particularly concerned about Western efforts to recruit the
Middle East’s Christian community as a tool against the Muslims.

Mohsen Haredy, an Islamic scholar and editor of the online
information service, Ask About Islam, urges caution in generalizing
about the suffering of Christians in the Middle East.

`Ordinary people, Muslims and Christians, live their life normally
and they have good relations with each other,’ he says.

`If some Christians are suffering somewhere in the Middle East, they
are victims of the political agenda of some states, the same way
Muslims are suffering, too.’

Conversion Attempts

Assuming the Christian claims of persecution are accurate, some
Muslims say they are not entirely unprovoked. The primary grievance
leveled against the Middle East’s Christians is their efforts to
convert Muslims to Christianity, a practiced disdained by Islam.

Christians, on the other hand, complain of forcible conversions to
Islam. In Egypt, there have been reports of Christian girls being
kidnapped and coerced into becoming Muslims; or Christians who are
bribed with jobs and money to change their faith.

The boom in media channels, satellite television and especially the
Internet has created new ways for both faiths to reach out to
potential newcomers, making the practice more difficult to counter.

Khoury does not deny encouraging people to embrace his faith.

`I believe that each Christian should do their duty and that is to
preach the gospel and to speak about the life that Christ lived,’ he
says. `I don’t think it’s wrong at all to speak about my Savior.’

Khoury does not believe in aggressive missionizing, but the
sensitivity of the issue will not push him to the shadows.

`If I keep a low profile, how effective will I be?’ he asks. `If a
Muslim wants to listen about my religion and my faith, I’ll be more
than happy to speak with him. I don’t think it’s wrong.’

This attitude does not fare well with the Muslim community. In
response to a query posted by a reader on the popular website Islam
Online, a religious advisor listed instructions about how Muslims
should deal with evangelizing campaigns in Islamic countries.

Muslims should learn to identify the problem and deal with it through
preventative methods and educational programs, it says.

`Determine the outlets through which these missionizing messages are
coming,’ the site instructed. `Whether it’s through films, leaflets,
magazines or other means. Do not let them through, and punish anyone
who violates this with a deterring penalty.’

It also advises the more well-off Muslims to provide social support
to the underprivileged and tend to their needs, so that evangelizing
Christians will have no reason to reach out to the poor and take
advantage of them.

`Muslims don’t want Christians to trade with their religion,’ Haredy
says.

Christians should not be exploiting the poverty and ill health of
others in order to pull them into the religion. Calling on any belief
should be based on dialogue and understanding.’

Other Muslim scholars voiced similar concerns about Christianity
using the poor status of some Muslims to recruit them to the
Christian faith.

Dr. Hamza Dib, a lecturer on Islamic law at Al-Quds University in
eastern Jerusalem, maintains that the most disturbing element is that
those targeted are often uneducated and do not have the intellectual
tools to challenge the conversion attempts.

`I’m not concerned for those who know about Islamic religion. I’m
afraid for those who don’t,’ he says.

While religious figures on both sides claim the relationship between
the Muslim and Christian communities on a daily basis is mostly
cordial and even warm, the attitude of Muslims toward their
co-religionists who convert to Christianity is an entirely different
story.

Muslims who insist on converting to Christianity testify to
horrendous difficulties in maintaining their faith.

`This is a catacomb existence for these new Christians,’ says Shea.
`It’s not a flowering of Christianity. There are some conversions,
but it’s a hard cultivation and there’s much intolerance in these
places. They have to hide their conversion.’

A case in point is Sam (The Media Line is withholding his real name
out of concern for his safety). Sam, who is Middle East native,
converted from Islam to Christianity nearly 20 years ago and has
since made a home for himself in Europe.

`It was a long journey. I’m one of the early converts,’ he says.

The problems facing converts in his home country apply to every
aspect of life: including issuing an identity card, getting married,
educating children, and securing an inheritance. The harassment is
both bureaucratic, from the government, and physical, from friends
and even family members, he says.

Sam insists that he was not encouraged by the Christian community to
become a Christian because `they were scared.’

`I had a friend, a young lady from a family of strong Muslims, and
her family slaughtered her because she became a Christian,’ he says.

The government does not systematically kill people if they convert,
but if they are killed by someone in the community, the murder will
be met with impunity, he explains.

According to Islam, Muslims must not convert from their faith.

Traditionally, a Muslim man who turned his back on the religion would
be executed and a woman would be imprisoned until she repented. But
this penalty is only applied if these people pose a threat to Muslim
society, such as propagating their new religion, says Dr. Muhammad
Serag, a professor of Islamic studies at the American University in
Cairo.

He explains that this severe attitude toward converts was originally
adopted for political reasons — in order to preserve the interests
of the Muslim society.

`In the past it could be appreciated, understood or justified, but
not in modern times.’

Conversion from Islam is still frowned upon in Muslim society.

Haredy says Muslims have no problem with people of other faiths and
cites the Quranic verse `Let there be no compulsion in religion,’
(Al-Baqara, 2:256) as evidence.

`If some Muslims are not practicing this, then the problem is with
their understanding of Islam, not with Islam itself. Islam should not
be judged by the bad practice of Muslims.’

Fawzy, like Khoury, believes there is a battle between the two
religions, and does not see an end in sight under the current
conditions.

`The only way to end the war is to say Christianity is in the church,
Islam is in the mosque and let us live as Egyptians. We don’t need to
have religion everywhere in our lives,’ he says.

Many identify this perceived battle between Muslims and Christians
with the clash between East and West. But while the battle has until
now been limited to conventional war-like tactics, the 21st century
could mark a dangerous turning point, with the weapons available
today becoming both more effective and more destructive.

Dwindling Numbers

Quantifying the number of Christians in the Middle East today,
compared with their numbers in the past, is a difficult, if not
impossible task. Governments in the region have an interest in
keeping census data quiet for political reasons, while Christians
tend to inflate their numbers.

`Religious demographics are so sensitive in these places that they
don’t take censuses that are meaningful, so we’re just guessing the
figures,’ says Nina Shea, director of the Center of Religious Freedom
at the Hudson Institute.

Any census of religious groups would also include ethnic minorities,
so the results could upset the delicate balance of power in countries
where the relative strength of one group compared to another can
affect the political make-up. Lebanon is a prime example of the
phenomenon.

Numerous United Nations organizations and NGOs contacted by The Media
Line could not provide sufficient data to point to an accurate trend
in Christian demographics in the Middle East over the past century.
However, several Christian sources and academics estimated that
Christians comprised between 20 and 30 percent of the population at
the beginning of the Twentieth Century.

The major changes came about through civil wars, and especially in
the massacre and deportation of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire
during World War I.

Today, with the exception of Lebanon, Christians comprise less than
10% of the populations of most Middle Eastern countries. In some
states, such as Saudi Arabia, Mauritania and Somalia, there are none.
(See chart below)

The reasons for the decline in the numbers of Christians vary. Some
are fleeing because of discrimination from their societies or from
the regime; and some are being persecuted.

The ease of travel has made it much simpler now than in the past to
leave the region. Many Christians are well-educated and find that
they have more opportunities in the Western world than in the Middle
East.

The fact that Christians have a lower birthrate than Muslims also
works against them demographically.

Conversions from Christianity to Islam, whether forced or voluntary,
is another contributing factor – although not a major factor,
numerically – in their dwindling numbers.

Raheb, pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Christmas Church in
Bethlehem, points to another disturbing aspect of this exodus. It is
not just the Christians leaving the Middle East, he says. Those
departing also include secular Muslims and in the case of Israel,
liberal Jews.

The region, he says, is gradually losing its pluralism and leaving a
disgruntled, homogeneous and more radical society behind.

The Christian population in Iraq, for example, has diminished
significantly since the war in 2003, because many are fleeing from
both the hardships of war and persecution.

It is estimated that Iraqi Christians account for nearly 40% of the
refugees who have fled the country, a percentage several times higher
than their proportion in the general Iraqi population.

According to the CIA’s World Factbook, the percentages of Christians
living in countries and territories which are members of the Arab
League are as follows:

1) Algeria – Less than 1%
2) Bahrain – 9%
3) Comoros – 2%
4) Djibouti – 6%
5) Egypt – 10%
6) Iraq – 3%
7) Jordan – 6%
8) Kuwait – Less than 15%
9) Lebanon – 39%
10) Libya – Less than 3%, if any (no info)
11) Mauritania – None
12) Morocco – 1.1%
13) Oman – None
14) Qatar – 8.5%
15) Saudi Arabia – None
16) Somalia – None
17) Sudan – 5%
18) Syria – 10%
19) Tunisia – 1%
20) West Bank – 8%, Gaza – 0.7%
21) United Arab Emirates – Less than 4%
22) Yemen – No info, except that there are some very small
Christian communities

It is worth noting that because of a lack of hard data, many of these
figures are based on estimates. In several cases, Christians in these
countries say their true numbers are much higher.

?NewsID024

http://www.themedialine.org/news/news_detail.asp

Survey gives lead to Georgian opposition candidate

ARMENPRESS

SURVEY GIVES LEAD TO GEORGIAN OPPOSITION CANDIDATE

TBILISI, DECEMBER 28, ARMENPRESS: The Common
European Cause, a Ukraine-based organization, which
will conduct an exit-poll after early January 5
presidential election in Georgia, said there will be a
run-off.
A public opinion survey conducted by the
organization showed that some 31 percent of voters
would cast their ballots in favor of the joint
opposition candidate, Levan Gachechiladze.
Business tycoon Badri Patarkatsishvili, who made it
clear he would pull out of the race, would get 17.6
percent of votes and Mikhail Saakashvili 16.5 percent.
The survey found that 18 percent were still
undecided. Only 4 percent said they would boycott the
election.
The survey was conducted between December 19-24
among 2,400 people.

BAKU: FM: Outcome of negotiations on NK will be coord. with people

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Dec 26 2007

Azerbaijani Foreign Minister: Outcome of negotiations on the
settlement of Nagorno Karabakh conflict will be coordinated with
people

[ 26 Dec 2007 16:23 ]

New elements were included into document presented to conflict
parties by OSCE Minsk Group’s co-chairs-mediators on the settlement
of Nagorno Karabakh conflict, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov told the journalists APA reports

It is normal that co-chairs included new elements into the document.
There are proposals in the document that can be adopted by
Azerbaijan.
`The others should be worked step by step,’ he said. Minister stated
that basic principles of settlement have been determined and stressed
that outcome of negotiations will be coordinated with people./APA/

Armenian Embassy In Russia Verifying Information On Detention Of Arm

ARMENIAN EMBASSY IN RUSSIA VERIFYING INFORMATION ON DETENTION OF ARMED ARMENIANS NEAR RESIDENCE OF RUSSIAN PRESIDENT

2007-12-25 15:08:00

ArmInfo. Armenian Embassy in Russia is verifying information that
armed Armenians were detained near the residence of Russian President,
Press Secretary of Armenian Foreign Ministry Vladimir Karapetyan
told ArmInfo.

‘The Embassy has not been informed officially’, V. Karapetyan said.

Media reported yesterday that the detained Armenians were armed. They
said they had arrived from Nizhghorod district and occurred near the
residence because of losing their way.

US Official Says 2008 Poll Important For Armenia’s Transition To Dem

US OFFICIAL SAYS 2008 POLL IMPORTANT FOR ARMENIA’S TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY

Mediamax News Agency
Dec 25 2007
Armenia

US co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group for settlement of the Nagornyy
Karabakh conflict, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European
and Eurasian Affairs Matthew Bryza, has said Armenia’s upcoming
presidential election "is an important moment for Armenia’s transition
to democracy as it will present the opportunity to strengthen and unite
achievements in the sphere of political freedoms and civil rights".

In an exclusive interview with the Armenian Mediamax news agency
published on 25 December, Bryza voiced the hope that the election
will be "the most free and fair in Armenia’s history".

Bryza also welcomed Armenia’s decision to invite OSCE observers, saying
that this would "ensure conditions for a free and uncensored press".

In a separate report, the agency quoted Bryza as saying he hoped
that it will be possible "to reach a verbal, gentleman’s agreement"
on the settlement of the Nagornyy Karabakh issue before the Armenian
presidential election. Bryza said that the latest draft of the key
principles for the conflict’s settlement was presented to the Armenian
and Azerbaijani authorities in Madrid and that it "contains suggestions
on overcoming the disagreements between Armenia and Azerbaijan on
several questions".

He added that the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen are going to visit
the region in mid-January 2008 "to get to know the reactions of the
presidents, Armenia’s Robert Kocharyan and Azerbaijan’s Ilham Aliyev
to the latest suggestions".

"The co-chairmen hope that the presidents will reach a verbal
agreement concerning this document before the presidential election in
Armenia. Reaching such a verbal agreement will provide the opportunity
to start negotiations on a peace treaty, which will be based on the
key principles," Bryza said.

Bryza said that the current key principles are not identical to those
proposed three years ago, the agency added. "Some of the changes,
taken into consideration by the mediators, are considerable and are
a result of important compromises on both sides," Bryza added.

"The president should be themselves sure that the mediators’ proposal
promises real benefits and complies with the national interests of
their countries. When each of the presidents admits that he and his
colleague have reached the finish line in the search for concessions,
they will face a decisive choice – to agree to the just compromise
on the table or start from zero with a risk of a start of an armed
conflict? We hope that the presidents will choose the key principles,
which outline the just and long term settlement," Bryza said.

TEHRAN: Iran, Armenia Seek Further Co-Op

IRAN, ARMENIA SEEK FURTHER CO-OP

Press TV, Iran
Dec 24 2007

The Armenian President Robert Kocharian has called Tehran-Yerevan
bilateral relations significantly beneficial, valuable and
constructive.

During a meeting with Iran’s outgoing ambassador, Alireza Haqiqian,
the Armenian President said that Iran and Armenia share many joint
projects that will be fulfilled soon.

The gas transfer pipelines between the two states and two electricity
transfer lines have been the most significant joint projects of the
two states during the past two years.

Tehran and Yerevan are also planning to construct a power station
on the Aras River, which forms the common border between the two
countries, and a wind power plant in Armenia.

Democracy And Human Rights Are More Important For Levon Ter-Petrosia

DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS ARE MORE IMPORTANT FOR LEVON TER-PETROSIAN THAN HIS NATION’S INTERESTS, POLITICAL SCIENTIST CONSIDERS

Noyan Tapan
Dec 24 2007

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 24, NOYAN TAPAN. As political scientist Levon
Melik-Shahnazarian predicted, though force major situations in the
South Caucasian region are not excluded, nevertheless, the probability
of resumption of Armenian-Azeri war is reduced to minimum. As he
mentioned at the December 24 press conference, operations between the
two countries do not proceed from big powers’ interests. According to
him, Nagorno Karabakh problem’s moving from the Minsk Group format
to the framework of GUAM cooperation is also improbable in 2008,
but Armenia should be also ready for such developments.

The problem will receive a fair solution favorable for Armenia,
if, in M. Shahnazarian’s opinion, a candidate having national way
of thinking wins the 2008 presidential elections of Armenia. In
response to the question of what candidate he means precisely, the
political scientist said: "National way of thinking may be found in
all candidates, except Levon Ter-Petrosian."

According to Melik-Shahnazarian, the first RA President in the years
of his tenure proved that democracy, human rights are more important
for hom than his nation’s interests.

Parliamentary Hearings On Armenian-Turkish Relations Come Up To Expe

PARLIAMENTARY HEARINGS ON ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS COME UP TO EXPECTATIONS OF ORGANIZERS

Noyan Tapan
Dec 20, 2007

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 20, NOYAN TAPAN. The hearings on the subject
"Armenian-Turkish Relations. Problems and Prospects" held in the
RA National Assembly on December 19-20 came up to the organizers’
expectations and provided rich material for developing a concept,
said Armen Rustamian, the chairman of the NA Standing Committee on
Foreign Relations that initiated these hearings.

According to him, in order to summarize the hearings and develop a
conclusion, the standing committee will soon create a subcommittee
on Armenian-Turkish relations, which will be composed of NA deputies
and experts. A. Rustamian said that the conclusion should include
conceptual provisions and be agreed on with the respective bodies of
the executive power, particularly with the foreign ministry. "This
will be our initial document to direct our steps both at legislative
and executive levels," he said.

According to A. Rustamian, the materials of the hearings will soon
be published in a booklet.

Armenian Foreign Minister: Turkey Does Not Have A Moral Right To Rai

ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTER: TURKEY DOES NOT HAVE A MORAL RIGHT TO RAISE A PROBLEM OF ARMENIA’S REFUSAL FROM INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

arminfo
2007-12-19 23:24:00

ArmInfo. ‘Official Ankara puts three pre-conditions against us for
establishing of relations with Yerevan – recognition of the Turkish
borders by Armenia, settlement of the Karabakh conflict in favour of
Azerbaijan and refusal from international recognition of the Armenian
genocide of 1915’, – Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan said
over the parliamentary hearings dedicated to the Armenian-Turkish
relations.

He also added that Turkey does not have a moral right to raise a
problem of Armenia’s refusal from international recognition of the
Armenian genocide.

Ankara saying of its aspiration to resolve the Karabakh conflict
peacefully, at the same time closes its border to Armenia. This
is nonsense, as such an approach is unacceptable in international
relations. Oskanyan recalled that over the last 16-17 years Turkey
twice lost its chance to contribute in normalizing and stabilizing
of the region and resolving of economic problems. First, it was
in 1991 when the USSR collapsed, and Russia was too weak to affect
the region. ‘That time Turkey could not contradict its ethnic and
political interests to strategic interests of the region. Secondly,
it happened in 2003 when they started the talks on Turkey’s joining
the European Union. Turkey had to explain to its people that for
joining the EU one should establish relations with its neighbours
and open the borders, but it did not happen, Oskanyan emphasized.

U.S. Consulate Issues More Visa Data On Armenians

U.S. CONSULATE ISSUES MORE VISA DATA ON ARMENIANS
By Anna Saghabalian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Dec 19 2007

Nearly two in three Armenians seeking to travel to the United States
are denied an entry visa due to a high risk of their failure to return
home on time, the U.S. consul general in Yerevan said on Wednesday.

Robin Busse revealed that some 10,400 Armenian nationals have applied
for a U.S. visa and less than 40 percent have been granted one this
year. "The refusal rate has been stable over the last ten years,"
he said.

The U.S. consulate in Yerevan has regularly released the number of
non-immigrant visa applications processed by it but has until now
avoided specifying how many of them were granted.

Busse said the refusal rate is quite high because many Armenians
traveling to the U.S. have overstayed their visas. "A fair number
of Armenians do violate the non-immigrant visa and don’t return," he
told reporters. "Every time that happens, it makes it more difficult
for other people to get visas because you start having a lack of
confidence," added the consul.

The U.S. and the state of California in particular has been a major
destination for hundreds of thousands of Armenians who have left
their country in search of employment abroad. According to some
expert estimates, some 200,000 of them currently live and work,
often illegally, in California.

According to Busse, the main requirement to visa applicants is to
prove that they have strong personal, financial and other links
to Armenia. He said U.S. consular officials are usually right in
assessing their chances of becoming an illegal immigrant. But he
could not say what percentage of Armenian travelers to America has
failed to return home in recent years.