A Groban Look-Alike, A Brooding Violin

A GROBAN LOOK-ALIKE, A BROODING VIOLIN
David Patrick Stearns

Philadelphia Inquirer
A_Groban_look-alike__a_brooding_violin.html
April 16 2009

Inquirer Classical Music Critic

In a world of concert violinists that’s increasingly crowded with the
young and the charismatic, Sergey Khachatryan stands apart: He looks
as young as any but seems almost too old to be alive.

A brooding, slightly pained presence, the 24-year-old winner of
Belgium’s famous Queen Elisabeth Competition seems to submit to
the great violin concertos as much as he plays them – doing so with
truth-probing tempos and intimacy of expression, he seems to speak
through the violin as if it were a first language. Seen on the street,
he’s a skinny kid in a hoodie, with Josh Groban eyes. With a violin,
he’s a musical lightning rod.

"The only place my emotions are coming out is on the stage – in
my whole life," he explained on Tuesday, having arrived here for
this week’s concerts with the Philadelphia Orchestra tomorrow and
Saturday at the Kimmel Center. "Maybe God made me like that. Maybe
my emotions are so strong onstage because it’s the only place I can
show them. . . .

"To be on the stage is a completely different world. For example, if
you have some pain in your body, when you step on stage, everything
goes. I’ve played concerts when ill. I had a temperature of 38 Celsius
[100.4], which is kind of high. . . . But the stage is a miracle
place where you forget everything but being in the music. And this
gives you a lot of energy."

Sometimes he has more energy than conductors can keep up with. That’s
reportedly what happened when he was in the final movement of the
Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto with the Philadelphia Orchestra in Saratoga
last August. That’s also true in Shostakovich’s Violin Concerto No. 1
(which he plays this week in Philadelphia) as seen on YouTube. No
wonder he plays only 50 to 55 concerts a year – each one leaves him
so empty, he says, "I need to refill everything. I don’t want to do
this as an everyday job."

What could be mistaken for an iconoclastic manner is, in fact,
his commitment to making music live in the moment. That’s why his
Philadelphia performances are philosophically bound to be different
from his 2007 recording of the Shostakovich concerto (in which he
collaborates with the same conductor, Kurt Masur). Added to that
is a concrete difference from past performances: It’s Khachatryan’s
first with a new violin: His prescribed four years with the "Huggins"
Stradivarius as part of the Queen Elisabeth prize ended; the Nippon
Foundation has now loaned him the "Lord Newlands" Strad.

That instrument offers a narrower range of possibilities – put it
under physical pressure and sound quality suffers – but Khachatryan
doesn’t necessarily feel restricted. He frequently talks about comfort
as being dangerous: He’d love to take up conducting – but no, it’s
too comfortable. He also rejects the conventionally fluid fingerings
when playing violin. Growing up in a family of pianists, he conceived
phrase readings in purely musical terms, not violinistic ones.

"The violin isn’t comfortable for the human body in general, that’s
why we’ve sacrificed a lot in the way of phrasing, because it has
to be comfortable for us," he says. "You don’t hear a big difference
between violinists anymore because you’re used to that comfort."

Much about Khachatryan is explained by his being Armenian –
seriously Armenian. He talks about his country’s ancient alphabet
and civilization. He’s one of the few who dislikes David Oistrakh’s
classic recordings of the Khachaturian Violin Concerto because there’s
so little sense of Armenian folklore.

The fact that his father gave him a violin when he was 5 – and he
didn’t give it up amid teenage rebellion – reflects a distinctively
Armenian faith in and respect for family. Thus, when the family
moved for job-related reasons from Yerevan, Armenia, to Frankfurt,
Khachatryan got solid German training, and at age 15 was the
youngest-ever winner of the Jean Sibelius International Competition.

His American presence began when he placed in the 2002 Indianapolis
Violin Competition (three years before his career-making Queen
Elisabeth win), and continues as he makes his other home with his
parents in Glendale, Calif., a city dominated by such a large,
close Armenian community that even the non-Armenians speak bits of
the language. Through that, he also acquired a green card, essential
for cutting through post-9/11 red tape to which so many non-American
musicians are subjected.

When he made his 2006 New York debut at the Mostly Mozart Festival with
the monumental Beethoven Violin Concerto, he audaciously played, as
an encore, the other great violin monument, Bach’s 16-minute Chaconne
in D minor for unaccompanied violin. A youthful flight of ego? No,
an Armenian family thing: Both parents had birthdays and this was
their present. (He also asked the orchestra’s permission to do so two
days in advance.) His recital partner is his sister, Lusine. He says,
"I can say nowadays that these are the only people I really trust."

But is there life beyond family and violin? Since he plays only a
third the number of engagements once played by Maxim Vengerov (now
a retired case of burnout), he has time to be a gearhead: He loves
his Subaru rally car in Frankfurt, even improving it with his own
automotive-engineering innovations. No significant other is on the
scene. His musical world has yet to include opera. But he refers to
jazz greats like Ella Fitzgerald by first names.

This other life is another reason why his approach to Shostakovich
has undergone a major shift. His recording was made amid a passionate
infatuation with the music. "That’s wonderful for the player," he says,
"but for the listener, it’s not so great.

"How to explain this? Whenever you’re burning about something, when
you’re emotionally completely inside the piece, it just stays there. It
doesn’t go out. You have to see the whole thing. If you’re standing
in front of a van Gogh painting close up, you can never understand
what he has to say. Now, I can see the music more globally."

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/magazine/20090416_

Armenia To Delegate Police Unit To CSTO Collective Forces

ARMENIA TO DELEGATE POLICE UNIT TO CSTO COLLECTIVE FORCES

Interfax
April 15 2009
Russia

The Armenian police will attach a unit from its organized crime
department to the Collective Operational Response Forces within the
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), Armenian police chief
Alik Sarkisian said at a press conference on Wednesday.

"A special unit from the Armenian police’s 6th main department will
be sent to the CSTO Collective Operational Response Forces. It has
been decided to send about 30 people now," Sarkisian said in response
to a question from Interfax.

Russian Interior Minister Rashid Nurgaliyev said two Russian police
units would be attached to the CSTO collective forces.

"A hundred people will be delegated from OMON [the riot police
forces] and 150 people from the special purpose police forces,"
Nurgaliyev said.

Yerevan hosted a first meeting between the CSTO interior ministers on
Wednesday. They discussed the establishment and functioning of the
CSTO Collective Operational Response Forces and interaction between
the Interior Ministries within the CSTO format.

Visit Of President Of Armenian NOC To Khankendi Does Not Comply With

VISIT OF PRESIDENT OF ARMENIAN NOC TO KHANKENDI DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SERZH SARGSYAN’S STATEMENTS THAT ARMENIA DOES NOT BEAR ATTITUDE TO "NKR": VICE PRESIDENT OF AZERBAIJANI NOC

Today.Az
47.html
April 15 2009
Azerbaijan

Vice president of the National Olympic Committee of Azerbaijan Khazar
Isayev has commented on the visit of president of the Armenian National
Olympic Committee Gagik Tsarukyan to the capital of unrecognized
"Nagorno Karabakh" Khankendi.

I do not accept such a state as "Nagorno Karabakh Republic" and do
not understand how Tsarukyan pays an official visit to Khankendi and
holds talks on the construction of a sport school where Armenians
want to raise up Olympic champions.

This does not correspond to the statements of the Armenian side headed
by president Serzh Sargsyan that Armenia bears no attitude to "NKR",
then how they invest to Khankendi’s sport and want to develop an
Olympic movement in this region? This is a pure schovinism", said
Isayev in his interview to Azerisport.

A new sport school will appear in Khankendi. The agreement about
construction of a sport school was attained during the visit of a
delegation, headed by president of the National Olympic Committee
of Armenia, deputy of National Assembly, leader of the "Flourishing
Armenia" Gagik Tsarukyan to the separatist formation.

"This school will become a good place for our sportsmen, among whom
we can select participants of the Olympic games", said he.

Tsarukyan assured that the sport administration of Armenia will help
the separatist territorial formation in the issue of specialists.

http://www.today.az/news/society/515

Armenian Figure Skaters To Participate In Crystal Skate Internationa

ARMENIAN FIGURE SKATERS TO PARTICIPATE IN CRYSTAL SKATE INTERNATIONAL TOURNAMENT

PanARMENIAN.Net
14.04.2009 12:31 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian figure skaters Sargis Hayrapetyan and
Slavik Hayrapetyan will participate in Crystal Skate international
tournament due in Moscow on April 25 and 26.

"Only Karapetyan brothers will depart for the Russian capital. Our
girls have not trained enough for the competition," President of
the Figure Skating Federation of Armenia Samvel Khachatryan told a
PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

"We will be back in Yerevan on April 27," he said.

On The Package Of Draft Amendments To Broadcast Legislation

ON THE PACKAGE OF DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO BROADCAST LEGISLATION

A1+
10:02 pm | April 09, 2009

Society

STATEMENT
OF YEREVAN PRESS CLUB,
"INTERNEWS" MEDIA SUPPORT NGO,
MEDIA DIVERSITY INSTITUTE-ARMENIA,
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION,
"ASPAREZ" JOURNALIST’S CLUB,
VANADZOR PRESS CLUB

ON THE PACKAGE OF DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO BROADCAST LEGISLATION

The agenda of the RA National Assembly includes the second hearing
of the package of draft amendments to the RA Laws "On Television
and Radio", "Regulations of the National Commission on Television
and Radio", "Regulations of the RA National Assembly", "On State
Duty". Despite the few improvements against the previous version of
the package strongly criticized by our organizations in the statement
of February 3, 2009, the document, as we see it, remains far from
the demands of the time.

Any legislative initiative on television and radio must today be
assessed from the perspective of solving the four cornerstone problems
of the Armenian broadcast sphere:

– ensuring the independence of the National Commission on Television
and Radio – the body that regulates the activities of TV and radio
companies;

– real reformation of the Public TV and Radio Company, inclusion of
PTRC in the field of legal regulation, creation of mechanisms of its
responsibility and accountability to the society;

– formation of new legal conditions of impartial and transparent
broadcast licensing competitions;

– revocation of the ban on allocation of frequencies.

The legislative changes that do not entail basic solutions to the
problems above can be only seen as cosmetic.

In this regard the improvement of certain provisions of the draft law
package on broadcasting, proposed for the second hearing by the RA
National Assembly, are nothing but a reform imitation and do not in
any way contribute to overcoming the total control of the authorities
over the TV and radio air in Armenia.

As a main argument to support the package its authors refer to the
positive assessment of the Council of Europe expert. Meanwhile, the
CE assessment, while phrased in a very polite and cautious manner,
contains criticism of a number of important clauses of the drafts. In
particular, this document clearly states the absence of due guarantees
to the independence of the National Commission on Television and Radio
and the Council of Public TV and Radio Company, as well as about the
incompliance of the PTRC structure to the internationally accepted
standards of good governance.

Even if one shares the satisfaction of the CE expert with most
of the remaining provisions of the package, the two mentioned
shortcomings, referring to the cornerstone issues of the broadcasting
legislation, render the voting of the RA NA deputies for the package
questionable. What is the value of amendments to the RA Law "On
Television and Radio", if they do not call for a basic review of the
mechanisms permanently criticized over the past 12 years, ever since
the debate of the broadcast legislation started?

It is quite surprising that the Council of Europe expert, assessing the
package of the draft law on regulating the broadcasting, overlooked
the recommendations of the Resolutions of the Parliamentary Assembly
of the Council of Europe 1532 (2007), 1609 (2008), 1620 (2008) and
1643 (2009). Addressing the issues of Armenia’s compliance with its
commitments to the Council of Europe and functioning of democratic
institutions in the country, these Resolutions, proceeding from the
political situation in the country, define the agenda of reforms,
also with regard to media. The recommendations raise the issues of
independence of the regulatory body, the transparency of broadcast
licensing competitions, and the possibility of "A1+" TV company
taking part in them, the ban on frequency allocation. Considering
the draft package without taking into account the four most recent
PACE recommendations on Armenia, the Council of Europe expert, on
the one hand, actually overlooked some questionable provisions of the
legislation in force (first of all, the ban on frequency allocation),
and on the other – assessed a whole number of legislative innovations
without taking into account the problematic practices of late
(transparency and impartiality of broadcast licensing competitions).

The expert welcomes the expansion of Article 50 of the RA Law "On
Television and Radio" that call for the provision of "full reasons"
to the applicants that were refused a license. A reference is made
here to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of June
17, 2008 on the case of "A1+" TV company founder, "Meltex" LLC. Yet,
in essence, the new draft law proposes nothing new with regard to
justification of license refusal, the mechanisms of defining criteria
that NCTR members should be guided with during the assessment of the
applications are still not prescribed.

One could have quoted a number of other examples of the insufficiently
thorough analysis of the draft law package by CE expert. Yet the
problem lies not with the particularities, but with the technique
that the media legislation is being shaped with in Armenia. Despite
the fact that a working group of local experts is set up adjacently
to the specialized standing committee of the National Assembly, the
recent drafts have not been discussed with this working group. The
international experts meet and discuss drafts only with their authors
or MPs interested in the draft promotion. Objections, comments,
clarifications as to the problems of practical applications of certain
clauses that the representatives of Armenian media community could
share, public debate – all this is of no interest to any one for
a long time already. Such closed process of legislation formation
cannot yield other results than the ones we have today.

Meanwhile, when the authorities are interested to promote certain
initiative, even if extremely unprofessional in its development,
it is immediately in the limelight of attention, debate is raised
about it on all TV channels. A vivid example of this is the draft law
on introducing new provisions to the Civil Code, stipulating moral
damage compensation, that has made so much noise lately. The vehement
endorsement of this initiative can be hardly regarded as anything other
than an attempt to divert the public attention from real problems
in media, obstruction of efforts of journalistic organizations in
legislation and media self-regulation.

Unfortunately, such red herrings have been used more than once and
run contrary to the policy of strengthening civil society as declared
by the RA authorities.

Proceeding from this, we call on the RA National Assembly:

1. To revoke from circulation the package of draft laws on broadcasting
and to come back to it after thorough review and improvement
in accordance with the international commitments of Armenia and
the suggestions of the working group at the RA National Assembly
Standing Committee on Science, Education, Culture, Youth and Sport
Issues. Otherwise we see no point in further participation in the
working group and shall call back our representatives from it;

2. To immediately include a draft law on abolishing the ban on
holding broadcast licensing competitions in the agenda of the National
Assembly. To refuse from the idea of digitalization at the expense
of free competition and media plurality. To hold open debate of the
TV and radio broadcast digitalization program;

3. To delay the initiatives related to new forms of journalistic
liability for defamation until the completion of processes aimed at
improving the broadcast legislation, guaranteeing true public service
broadcasting, pluralistic private TV and radio, media accountability
system formation. The attempts of prioritizing the issue of legal
liability of journalists damaging the development of civilized media
market will be viewed by us to be directed at the restriction of free
expression in Armenia.

Obama Avoids ‘Genocide’ Term

OBAMA AVOIDS ‘GENOCIDE’ TERM
Christi Parsons and Laura King

Los Angeles Times
April 7, 2009 Tuesday

He says he hasn’t changed his views on Armenian massacre, but omits
the word while visiting Turkey.

President Obama, steering a delicate course on an explosive issue,
said Monday his views on the mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman
Turks in the early 20th century have not changed since he declared
it a "genocide" last year, but he avoided using that term in front
of his Turkish hosts.

Instead, Obama emphasized the need to improve relations between
Turkey and Armenia, and pointed to hopes for a breakthrough to ease
long-standing tensions.

"If they can move forward and deal with a difficult and tragic history,
I think the whole world will encourage them," Obama told reporters
in Ankara, the Turkish capital.

By refraining from calling the deaths of as many as 1.5 million
Armenians beginning in 1915 a genocide, Obama for the moment avoided
offending a country whose help U.S. officials need in Iraq, Afghanistan
and elsewhere. At the same time, he avoided infuriating his Armenian
American supporters.

But Obama also contributed to the suspense surrounding a likely
presidential proclamation expected in time for April 24, the annual
Armenian remembrance day.

U.S. presidents usually issue statements deploring the mass killings
without calling them genocide. Armenian American organizations are
urging Obama to make good on his campaign pledge.

"We fully expect President Obama to honor his commitment and reaffirm
the Armenian genocide," the Armenian Assembly, a U.S. Armenian advocacy
group, said in a statement.

Turkish President Abdullah Gul emphasized that Turkey was willing to
open its archives to historians investigating the subject and allow
a joint commission to draw conclusions.

"It is not a political but an historic issue," he said. "That’s why
we should let historians discuss the matter." Obama administration
officials said delicate talks are continuing between Turkey and
Armenia over normalizing relations. Late in the evening at Istanbul’s
Dolmabahce Palace, the president met with the foreign ministers of
Turkey and Armenia to urge a quick agreement.

Obama’s remarks Monday, issued as he stood beside Gul, appeared
carefully calibrated. Though he didn’t utter the word "genocide"
or press Gul to address the issue, he pointedly reaffirmed previous
remarks on the subject.

In 2008, Obama said "the Armenian genocide is not an allegation, a
personal opinion or a point of view, but rather a widely documented
fact supported by an overwhelming body of historical evidence.

"The facts are undeniable."

Three years ago, Obama criticized the Bush administration for firing
John Evans, then-ambassador to Armenia, after Evans used the term
"genocide" to describe the slaughter.

After a private meeting with Gul in Ankara, Obama said at the news
conference that he hadn’t changed his views.

"My views are on the record and I have not changed views," Obama
said. "What I have been very encouraged by is news that under President
Gul ‘s leadership, you are seeing a series of negotiations, a process,
in place between Armenia and Turkey to resolve a whole host of
long-standing issues, including this one."

Turkey and Armenia have no diplomatic ties. Gul last year became the
first modern Turkish leader to visit Armenia, attending a World Cup
qualifying match between the teams of the two countries. Other events
in recent years, though, have brought wrenching reminders of the two
neighbors’ historic enmity.

In January 2007, a prominent Armenian editor, Hrant Dink, was gunned
down outside his newspaper’s office in central Istanbul, a killing
that shocked the country. The assailant was a 17-year-old Turkish
nationalist.

Before the assassination, nationalistic websites had expressed
outrage over Dink’s repeated calls for Turkey to recognize the
Armenian genocide and ensure that its Armenian minority did not
face persecution.

U.S. Armenian groups expressed disappointment over Obama’s comments
in Ankara, but did not criticize the president. Obama "missed a
valuable opportunity to honor his public pledge to recognize the
Armenian genocide," said Aram Hamparian, executive director of the
Armenian National Committee of America.

The Turkish Coalition of America said it was "encouraged" by Obama’s
remarks concerning Turkish-Armenian relations, but didn’t comment on
the genocide issue.

In Istanbul, Ilter Turan, a professor of political science at Bilgi
University, said he thought Obama had handled the Armenian issue
deftly.

"He expressed the view that problems arising from the past can be
resolved, and in a clear way," he said.

Armenian-Turkish Border Won’t Be Open On Apr. 16 =?x-unknown?

ARMENIAN-TURKISH BORDER WON’T BE OPEN ON APR. 16

PanARMENIAN.Net
06.04.2009 20:14 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian-Turkish border is unlikely to open
on Apr. 16, Caucasus Institute director, politologist Alexander
Iskandaryan told a news conference in Yerevan. Still, Yerevan and
Ankara might sign a memorandum on opening of borders and establishment
of diplomatic relations, Iskandaryan said.

According to Iskandaryan, there are both positive and negative
aspects to opening of borders. "There mustn’t be any closed borders
in the 21st century. Opening of borders will facilitate interaction
with European countries and enable to introduce Armenian capital in
eastern regions of Turkey. Among negative aspects is the inflow of
people from Eastern Turkey in Armenia and vice versa."

Iskandaryan also noted that numerous forces in Turkey are opposed
to opening of Armenian – Turkish border, so Azeri lobby is not the
first in the list.

"Nationalists, religious circles, ethnic Azeries are opposed to
normalization of Turkish – Armenian ties. Today Azerbaijan uses
all of its bargaining tools in dealing with Turkey," Alexander
Iskandaryan noted.

Candidate for Council of Elders killed in Yerevan

Candidate for Council of Elders killed in Yerevan

2009-04-04 12:25:00

ArmInfo. Candidate for the Council of Elders Karen Hakopyan, who held
the 101st place in RPA list, has been killed in Yerevan.

As "Haykakan Zhamanak" Yerevan newspaper reports, Hakopyan was killed
by an unknown person in a skirmish during the attack at another
candidate from the same party, Artur Sedrakyan, holding the 43rd place
in the party list. According to the source, the skirmish is connected
with the upcoming May 31 election to the Council of Elders of Yerevan.
The newspaper reports that A. Sedrakyan, who also got a gunshot wound,
came to the Police and gave evidences. K. Hakopyan was taken to the
hospital April 2 night, where he died without recovering consciousness.

According to the Police data, the incident happened in Raffi Street.
Four shells were found at the site of occurrence. Investigation is
underway.

BEIRUT: Ramgavar Party Opposes LF Armenian Catholic Pick in Beirut 1

NaharNet, Lebanon
April 5 2009

Ramgavar Party Opposes LF’s Armenian Catholic Pick in Beirut 1

The Ramgavar party has objected to the Lebanese Forces’ (LF)
nomination of Richard Kuyumjian for the Armenian Catholic seat in
Beirut’s first district.

In a meeting on Saturday, the party’s executive committee affirmed its
"support and solidarity with MP Serge Tor Sarkissian as March 14’s
candidate for the Armenian Catholic seat" in the district.

The committee mentioned that the party had previously coordinated with
other March 14 authorities on the issue of the bloc’s Armenian
candidates.

Informed sources told An Nahar newspaper that Tor Sarkissian’s
nomination was still under debate.

Beirut, 05 Apr 09, 10:19

FM to attend the `Alliance of Civilizations’ forum in Istanbul

Minister Nalbandian to attend the `Alliance of Civilizations’ forum in
Istanbul

armradio.am
04.04.2009 15:48

April 6-7 the Foreign Minister of Armenia, Edward Nalbandian, will
visit Istanbul to participate in the 2nd `Alliance of Civilizations’
forum under the auspices of the UN.

The aim of the `Alliance of Civilizations’ forum is to develop the
intercultural understanding and cooperation. The first forum took place
in Madrid in January 2008.

The forum in Istanbul will feature senior officials from 30 countries `
Presidents, Prime Ministers and Foreign Ministers.