Credit Agreement Signed Between Armenia’s Ministry Of Finance And Wo

CREDIT AGREEMENT SIGNED BETWEEN ARMENIA’S MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND WORLD BANK YEREVAN OFFICE
Hasmik Dilanyan

"Radiolur"
05.06.2009 14:49

A new credit agreement was signed today between the Ministry of Finance
of the Republic of Armenia and the World Bank Office in Yerevan. This
time the $25 million will be allocated to the improvement of the
sphere of education.

Diretor of the World Bank Yerevan Office Aristomene Varoudakis highly
appreciated the initiative of the Armenian Government to render
support to the field of education even under the conditions of the
global crisis.

Finance Minister Tigran Davtyan informed reporters about the amount
of external debt of Armenia. He said the external debt was normal
and three were no grounds to worry.

As for the $500 million Russia has promised, the Minister of Finance
said it was expecte din Armenia next week.

Yerevan To Host "The Turkic World, The Caucasus, And Iran: Civilisat

YEREVAN TO HOST "THE TURKIC WORLD, THE CAUCASUS, AND IRAN: CIVILISATIONAL CROSSROADS OF INTERACTIONS" CONFERENCE

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
03.06.2009 14:17 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The International Journal Iran and the Caucasus
(BRILL: Leiden – Boston), the Department of Iranian Studies at Yerevan
State University, the Makhtumquli Feraqi Centre for Turkic Studies at
ARYA International University (Yerevan), the Association for the Study
of Persianate Societies (Armenian Branch), in collaboration with the
International Society for the Study of Iran and the Caucasus (ISSIC),
Caucasian Centre for Iranian Studies (Yerevan), the Armenian-Turkmen
Cooperation Centre "Partev" (Yerevan), and the Armenian Association
for Academic Partnership and Support – ARMACAD (Yerevan) are organizing
an international conference entitled "The Turkic World, the Caucasus,
and Iran: Civilisational Crossroads of Interactions".

The Conference will be held at ARYA International University, Yerevan,
Armenia on July 10-12, 2009, The region of civilization interactions
from Central Asia to Eastern Europe and from Southern Russia to
Northern Iran has been one of the focal geographical points in world
history. The main cultural, political and civilization players in this
domain have been the Iranian and Turkic peoples, while the Caucasus
and the Transcaucasian region with their cultural, ethnographical
and linguistic uniqueness have served as a connecting link and an
arena for wars and peaceful cohabitation. Though the main stress of
the conference will be on cultures, histories (including archaeology,
etc.), languages and the literatures of this vast area, presentations
on modern political and regional issues, as well as the human ecology
topics are also welcomed. The conference seeks to emphasize links
between the Turkic world, the Caucasus, and Iran.

Working languages of the conference are English and Russian.

S. Ali Saghaian Says The Construction Of Iran-Armenia Railroad Is A

S. ALI SAGHAIAN SAYS THE CONSTRUCTION OF IRAN-ARMENIA RAILROAD IS A PROJECT OF GREAT STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE NOT ONLY FOR THE TWO STATES BUT ALSO FOR THE WHOLE REGION

ARMENPRESS
JUNE 2, 2009
YEREVAN

Construction of Iran-Armenia railroad is a project of great strategic
importance not only for the two states but also for the whole region.

Ambassador of Iran to Armenia Seyed Ali Saghayan told Armenpress
that the railroad can be considered a very convenient direction for
cargo transportation.

According to him, the Iranian technical-expert group has lately visited
Armenia to study in what direction the railroad must be constructed.

"Besides that we expect the investors to display interest towards
the project and Russia seems to be interested in the participation
of the project implementation," the Ambassador noted.

According to S. Ali Saghayan the political decision of construction of
the railroad has already been reached – during the Armenian President
Serzh Sargsyan’s visit to Iran an agreement has been reached and at
present the discussion of technical issues is being conducted.

Different variants of the direction of the railroad are being
discussed. With the initial information investment of 2 billion USD
will be needed for the construction of Iran-Armenia railroad. The
World Bank and Asian Development Bank have expressed interest in the
railroad construction project.

Armenian Ruling Party Wins Yerevan Mayor’s Seat

ARMENIAN RULING PARTY WINS YEREVAN MAYOR’S SEAT

June 1 2009
Turkey

Armenia’s ruling party candidate has been re-elected mayor of the
capital Yerevan, official results showed.

Armenia’s ruling party candidate has been re-elected mayor of the
capital Yerevan, official results showed on Monday, dashing opposition
hopes of winning support due to the country’s economic crisis.

When polling stations closed last night, the opposition said the
election was rigged and it would hold protest rallies.

International observers said the election met European standards
although there were some faults.

"This election was a step forward in comparison with elections held
in September 2008," Nigel Mermagen, head of the Council of Europe
observation mission, told a news conference.

"Some shortcomings were recorded," he said.

The Central Election Commission said President Serzh Sarksyan’s
Republican Party won more than 40 percent of the votes in the city,
which accounts for 1.1 million of Armenia’s 3.2 million people.

The party backed incumbent mayor Gagik Beglaryan.

Prosperous Armenia, which is a ruling party’s ally, won around 22
percent. The opposition Armenian National Congress led by former
President Levon Ter-Petrosyan won around 17 percent of the votes in
the 65-seat city council.

Economic hardships

Ter-Petrosyan, Armenia’s first president after independence from the
Soviet Union in 1991, lost to Sarksyan in presidential elections in
February 2008. Ter-Petrosyan’s supporters cried foul and 10 people
were killed in resulting unrest.

In the run-up to the mayoral election, the opposition hoped it could
capitalise on discontent over the economy, which has dived with the
global economic crisis and the impact of strategic ally Russia sliding
into recession.

GDP in the landlocked country is forecast to contract by 5.8 percent
in 2009 and prices have crept up since the Central Bank floated the
dram currency in March.

Sarksyan has also faced criticsim fire for a plan to normalise ties
with Turkey after a century of hostility over the World War One
killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks.

Many Armenians welcomed the deal in the belief Turkey would open
their border, which Ankara closed in 1993 over Armenia’s backing for
ethnic Armenian separatists fighting a war in Azerbaijan’s breakaway
Nagorno-Karabakh region.

But Turkish leaders have since said the frontier will remain shut
until Armenia makes concessions on Nagorno-Karabakh.

www.worldbulletin.net

Gagik Beglaryan Elected Mayor Of Yerevan

GAGIK BEGLARYAN ELECTED MAYOR OF YEREVAN

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
01.06.2009 11:39 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Republican Party of Armenia has won the May 31
elections to Yerevan city council.

According to the latest data, the RPA garnered 46.6% of votes. Gagik
Beglaryan, who topped the party’s list, retained the post of Mayor.

The turnout at elections to the Yerevan city council totaled 52.85%.

41.66% turnout recorded in elections to Yerevan city council by 6pm

41.66% turnout recorded in elections to Yerevan city council on Sunday
by 18:00 local time

YEREVAN, May 31. /ARKA/. Abram Bakhchagulyan, secretary of Armenian
Central Election Commission says 41.66% turnout was recorded in
elections to Yerevan city council on Sunday by 18:00 local time.

`There are 771,477 Yerevan residents eligible to vote. Of them, 321,403
or 41.66% have voted by 17:00′, he said.

Bakhchagulyan said that 49.97 voted in Shengavit (the highest turnout)
and 31.67% in Erebuni (the lowest turnout).

He said 40.53% voted in Nor-Nork, 40.43% in Kanaker-Zeytun, 34.66% in
Arabkir, 47.96% in Davitashen, 39.35 in Nubarashen, 49.62% in Avan,
43.38% in Achapnyak, 45.59% in Malatia-Sebastia, 39.37% in Kentron and
44.5% in Nork-Marash.

Only ten people restored their right to vote by 17:00 and then voted on
additional lists.

Elections to the city council are being held in Yerevan for the first
time. The council will consist of 65 members.

The first number in the list of the party than wins the majority of
seats in the council will automatically take up the mayor post.

Six political parties and one bloc will run in the elections.

Three of them ` Republican Party of Armenia, Prosperous Armenia and
Orinats Yerkir ` are members of the ruling coalition.

Other competitors are Armenian revolutionary federation Dasgnaktsutiun,
People’s Party, Labor Socialist Party of Armenia and20Armenian National
Congress opposition bloc.

Now Republican Gagic Beglaryan is the mayor of Yerevan. M.V.-0—

Polad Bulbul Oghly stated he’ll pass though Azerbaijan, should he…

Polad Bulbul Oghly stated that he’ll pass though Azerbaijan, should he
visit Stepanakert
30.05.2009 11:20 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Azerbaijan Ambassador to Russia Polad Bulbul Oghly
denied the information on his intention to visit NKR jointly with RA
Ambassador to Russia Armen Smbatyan.
`Our position is that such visits promote communication between
representatives of both countries societies, further peace process and
strengthen mutual trust. In this sense, even after the first visit, we
periodically discussed the possibility of second trip. Yet no concrete
agreements concerning format, structure, terms and organizational
condition of the trip are reached yet. As for the route, I’d like to
confirm that our passage through Armenia while on our way to NKR,
especially `with the permission of NKR authorities’ is
impossible. These are just surmises.
Should the second trip take place, it will be fulfilled via the route
of the first one. Meaning, the Azeri delegation will visit NKR through
Azerbaijan, while Armenian delegation will pass through Armenia,’
Vesti.Az cited Bulbul Oghly as saying.
As PanARMENIAN.Net learnt from reliable sources, Azerbaijan Ambassador
to Russia Polad Bulbul Ogly and RA Ambassador to Russia Armen Smbatyan
plan to visit Armenia on their way to NKR in the middle of July .The
diplomats will pass through Armenia to visit NKR, having received
official permission from NKR authorities.
The ambassadors have scheduled a meeting with NKR President Bako
Sahakyan, a visit to Amaras and Shushi. Most probably, Smbatyan and
Bulbul Ogly will cross NKR border by car and will proceed their way to
Baku
On June 28, 2007, representatives of Armenian and Azeri intelligentsia
paid a visit to Stepanakert, Yerevan and Baku on the initiative of
Azeri and Armenian Ambassadors to RF, Armen Smbatyan and Polad Bulbul
Ogly.

Decline of economy will make 7-12% in late 2009 – Hrant Bagratian

Decline of Armenian economy will make 7-12% in late 2009, Hrant
Bagratian says

YEREVAN, MAY 30, NOYAN TAPAN. The decline of Armenian economy will make
7-12% in late 2009. However, as the former prime minister of Armenia,
head of Freedom party Hrant Bagratian stated at the May 26 press
conference, new forecasts can be made and new corrections can be
probably be introduced in August.

In his words, the crisis in Armenia has now entered the second stage
which leads to a deep budgetary and banking crisis. He said that it is
not ruled out that the crisis in Armenia will have a fourth stage as
well. "This crisis has revealed the wrong policy conducted by the state
in the past 10 years," he noted.

As for the anti-crisis program of Armenian government, he said that the
government does not have any program as the budgetary allocations are
directed to where they are not necessary. "For example, 10 million
dollars was given to mining industry, but it is not known whom this
money was given to. Kajaran Copper and Molybdenum Enterprise that has
serious problems today is mentioned, but Robert Kocharian is behind
that enterprise," the former prime minister said.

H. Bagratian called the package of legislative tax amendments, which
became a subject of heated discussion at the National Assembly",
"absolute nonsense".

According to H. Bagratian, the decline of Russian economy is dependent
on oil prices. If oil price rises in Russia, then this country will
have a real opportunity to overcome the crisis, which in its turn will
result in regulation of the economic situation in Armenia. Besides, if
the anti-crisis program of the U.S. administration is successfully
completed in the summer, economic growth will be recorded in Russia in
6-9 months. "It means that there will be a positive change in Armenia
as well but it will take place in 2011-2012," H. Bagratian said.

Book Review: Spark that consumed a nation

Weekend Australian
May 30, 2009 Saturday
5 – All-round Review Edition

Spark that consumed a nation

by Richard Morrison

SECTION: REVIEW; Pg. 16

A new book reveals the tragic cost of Adolf Hitler’s first big
propaganda success, writes Richard Morrison

BY midnight on that startling evening, the flames from the bonfires
were leaping 9m into the air. Thousands had gathered to watch the
spectacle. Joseph Goebbels had already spoken, proclaiming the end of
“the age of exaggerated Jewish intellectualism”. But still the books
burned, thousands of them. And not just on the Opernplatz in Berlin
but in cities across Germany. By the end of the night a nation had
voluntarily consigned to the flames the best works of its finest
living writers.

The date — May 10, 1933 — is now as infamous in the annals of Nazi
tyranny as the Night of the Long Knives the following year or
Kristallnacht in 1938. All are seen as symbolic and horrific
milestones on the road to genocide. But who chose the authors whose
books were to be so publicly burned and whose reputations were
instantaneously trashed? Why were some pro-Nazi writers included? And
what became of the authors in the aftermath?

Until now, the answers have been sketchy at best. But a gripping new
book, just out in Germany, tackles these matters with tenacity and
brilliance. “I realised I had to write it the first time I saw the
list of authors whose books were burned,” says Volker Weidermann, the
journalist who has written Das Buch der Verbranntem Bucher (The Book
of the Burning Books).

“I’ve studied German literature of that period and I read books for
my living [Weidermann is literary editor of the Frankfurter Allgemeine
Sonntagszeitung]. Yet of the 100-odd German names on the list, I
hadn’t heard of half of them. I thought: `Who were these authors? And
were they so bad that, even now, they don’t deserve to have their
books read?’ So I started tracking down the books and reading them.”

That wasn’t easy. Weidermann found some titles advertised on the
internet. Some he discovered in antiquarian bookshops. Then, almost as
he had completed his herculean quest, he came across an old man: a
book collector living near Munich who had spent all his life and money
collecting 15,000 first editions of these banned books. “He’s now
over 80 and desperate for a public library to take on his collection,
but so far none has agreed. It would be a tragedy if these books were
lost all over again.”

What Weidermann discovered when he opened all these banned books
astonished him. “There are at least four or five of these banned
authors whose books, in my opinion, are forgotten masterpieces. People
such as Maria Leitner, who was terrifically courageous; even when
banned she kept returning to Germany to write reports that were
published abroad. She disappeared in 1941. Or Armin Wegner, who wrote
brilliant eyewitness accounts about the slaughter of the Armenians in
Turkey. In 1933 he actually wrote an open letter to Hitler, explaining
why the Jews were important for Germany. It was an amazingly brave
thing to do. It took just a week or two after that before they found
him, imprisoned him and tortured him.”

Weidermann concedes that there are also badly written books among
those consigned to the flames. “But as Joseph Roth wrote: `I hold all
the writers whose books were burned in high esteem because the fire
has purified them and ennobled them.’ And for any book by the banned
131 authors to have survived the Nazi bonfire is a little triumph:
evidence that someone, somewhere, was resisting tyranny.”

But how did the book burning come about? It’s easy to generalise that
the Nazis banned literature, music and art by people they hated. But
these were the first months of the new regime. The Nazis were far from
confident, despite the pro-Hitler euphoria, about how quickly they
could impose anti-Semitic policies. Only a month earlier a boycott of
Jewish shops organised by the regime had failed embarrassingly. That
didn’t lessen the resolve of Hitler and his henchmen to persecute the
Jews. But it did make them wary of identifying themselves with any
more anti-Semitic demonstrations that might fall flat.

Instead it was university students who played the leading role in
getting the books burned. That may seem incredible to us today.
Students are supposed to be free-thinking rebels, not rabble-rousers
for the far Right. But as Weidermann points out: “To support the
Nazis in the early 1930s was an act of rebellion. You were rebelling
against all the confusion of the Weimar Republic, against the
humiliating Treaty of Versailles and in favour of a strong, united,
nationalist Germany.”

In April 1933, the Nazi Students’ League called for the “public
burning of subversive Jewish writings by university students in
response to the shameless anti-German smear campaign conducted by
international Jewry”. These bonfires, in university cities throughout
Germany, were to include material seized from university and public
libraries, as well as bookshops and private
collections. Astonishingly, there was virtually no opposition from
booksellers or university professors. Far from defending free
expression, many academics seemed as enthusiastic about the book
burning as their students. Cologne University announced that “the
Senate and rector have decided to attend the occasion. Dress: dark
suit.”

But who would draw up this first list of banned books? After all, it
wasn’t just a matter of including Jewish authors (who comprised only
40per cent of the list). The Nazis were also keen to suppress the
pacifists and communists who had dominated the Berlin avant-garde cafe
scene in the ’20s. The task demanded someone who had read a lot, who
knew the literary scene, yet was firmly fascist. In short, it needed a
Nazi librarian. Step forward, Wolfgang Herrmann.

The ambitious, 25-year-old Herrmann was already giving lectures on
“Nazi librarianship” back in 1929, when he was still handing out
fines for overdue books in Breslau Municipal Library. By 1932 he was
drawing up lists of “good books” for German libraries. Now came the
other side of the coin: the chance to name and shame “bad books” as
well. Responding to a request by the militant students, he quickly
wrote down the titles of books by 131 undesirable authors.

His choice was extraordinary. Several American authors, including
Ernest Hemingway, were on the list. So, even more inexplicably, were
three or four pro-Nazi German authors. “Clearly Herrmann used his big
moment to bring down some people in the literary world that he simply
didn’t like,” Weidermann says.

But Herrmann himself was soon brought down. A year or two earlier he
had written the true but incautious observation that Hitler’s Mein
Kampf contained “no intellectually original and theoretically
well-developed ideas”. A couple of weeks after the book burning, this
rashview came back to haunt him. This was atime of vicious infighting
in the Nazis’ ranks. Herrmann belonged to one faction. A rival group
was furious to have fallen behind in the race to purify German
culture, so it set about purging thepurgers. Herrmann’s review of Mein
Kampf was dredged up. His career never recovered. Foryears he battled
to prove his loyalty to the fuhrer, without much success. When war
came he joined the German Army and was killed in 1945.

Meanwhile, what were the repercussions of May 10 for the Nazi
leadership and the persecuted writers? The former was horribly
emboldened. As Goebbels frankly admitted in his speech at the Berlin
bonfire, the party hierarchy was astonished that “so swift and
radical a clearance could be carried out in Germany”.

They were right to be astonished. Without any coercion, the German
public had watched with apparent delight as the books of superstar
authors went up in smoke. Anti-Semitism clearly converged with
anti-intellectualism that night. The Nazi leaders gleefully took
note. Within a year, similar purges were being instigated in concert
life, opera houses, theatres and art galleries.

There was utter disbelief, too, among the writers whose books were
burned. But this was disbelief mingled with dismay, fear or plain
bewilderment. “My books are burning at the stake in front of the
university where I used to address thousands of people!” wrote Stefan
Zweig to his friend Romain Rolland. “And not a single German writer
is protesting at this auto-da-fe. Not even in private letters.”

“Some writers were far-sighted enough to sense what would happen in
Germany, right up to the war and the Holocaust,” Weidermann says.
“Others had no conception of what was going on or its repercussions.
Some authors immediately emigrated, but many didn’t. That wasn’t
necessarily because they approved of the regime. Many felt, as Armin
Wegner said, that `emigrating is like dying’.”

One way or another, however, an entire generation of German authors
was silenced, many permanently, on May 10, 1933. “Just 20 per cent of
the 131 writers whose works were burned that night survived the next
12 years of Hitler’s regime,” Weidermann says. “Many killed
themselves, often in exile. Some, like Maria Leitner, probably starved
to death. With others, we just don’t know. Those were years in which
people simply disappeared.”

For those who did survive until 1945, there was one last, bitter pill
to swallow. “Many of the famous authors returning to Germany after
the war were devastated to find that there was no audience for them,”
Weidermann says. “The public that had burned their books in 1933
still didn’t want them! That was utterly humiliating for someone like
Thomas Mann, who thought that there was a `better Germany’ that would
welcome him back.”

By then, of course, a new tyranny was rising in the east, new in
political complexion but horribly similar in its attitude to literary
freedom.

“During my research I found a list in an antiquarian bookshop of the
thousands of books banned by the East German authorities in the ’50s
and ’60s,” Weidermann says. “Many of the authors were the same ones
that had books burned by the Nazis.”

The faces of the persecutors had changed but the persecution went on.

Das Buch der Verbrannten Bucher is published by Kiepenheuer & Witsch,
Cologne.

Eastern Partnership Parliamentary Assembly Can Have Center In Vilniu

EASTERN PARTNERSHIP PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY CAN HAVE CENTER IN VILNIUS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
29.05.2009 18:33 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Emanuelis Zingeris, member of Parliamentary Committee
on Foreign Affairs, proposes that EU Eastern Partnership Parliamentary
Assembly have centre in Vilnius.

The Lithuanian official anticipates a positive decision, considering
his country an active advocate of EU eastern neighbors.

"Lithuania has greatly contributed to the establishment of a European
Humanitarian University and actively supports Georgia, Ukraine and
Azerbaijan’s efforts. Lithuanian politicians permanently cooperate
with politicians from EU eastern neighbors. Lithuania’s becoming
winner is desirable, considering the country’s role as an advocate
and lobbyist of eastern states," Zingeris noted.

The Lithuanian official believes that political decision on
Parliamentary Assembly’s residence will be favorable for his country
during Switzerland’s chairmanship.

Currently discussions are held for choosing one of EU member states’
towns as residence.