OSCE MG U.S. Co-Chairman Sure That George Bush Administartion Will S

OSCE MG U.S. CO-CHAIRMAN SURE THAT GEORGE BUSH ADMINISTRATION WILL STRONGLY OPPOSE ANY DRAFT LAW ON RECOGNITION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

ArmInfo News Agency, Armenia
Nov 13 2006

Matt Bryza, a top-level official from the U.S. State Department,
U.S. Co-chairman of OSCE Minsk Group for settlement of Karabakh
conflict, asserted that the George Bush Administration would strongly
oppose any draft law on the recognition of Armenian genocide.

However, he added that given the complexity of the new political
environment since the midterm elections, it was hard for them to
precisely foresee any outcome.

Zaman reports that Matt Bryza was speaking at the annual convention of
the Assembly of Turkish- American Associations (ATAA) and commented
on the possibility of an Armenian genocide bill introduced to the
House of Representatives, where the Democrats have recently gained
control. He described the new situation as a change in the political
reality and said that it was impossible for the administration to
predict how the new mechanism would operate with regards to the fate
of any proposal for recognition of the Armenian genocide.

Newly ensconced House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, promised the
Armenian lobby to support any bill regarding the genocide.

Meanwhile, in his address at the meeting, Bryza, drew attention to
Russian attempts at being the sole energy supplier to the region and
underlined the importance of Turkish-American strategic cooperation.

Analysis: 99-Percent Vote Not Quite So Clear-Cut (South Ossetia)

ANALYSIS: 99-PERCENT VOTE NOT QUITE SO CLEAR-CUT (SOUTH OSSETIA)
By Tony Halpin of The Times

The Times, UK
Nov 13 2006

The Times Moscow Correspondent examines the implications of the South
Ossetian vote for independence from Georgia

The 99-per cent vote in favour of independence for South Ossetia,
almost Soviet in the scale of its declared certainty, deepens the
bitter rift in relations between Georgia and Russia.

The breakaway region of Georgia openly declares that independence
is only a stepping stone to unification with Russia, an ambition
the Kremlin has quietly encouraged by issuing passports to South
Ossetian residents.

Moscow says that the popular mood reflected in the vote should be
respected, even if it will not break ranks with the international
community by recognising the result of the referendum.

However, the poll of 55,000 eligible voters was not as clear-cut as
South Ossetia’s pro-Moscow leadership would have the world believe.

Villages inhabited by 14,000 ethnic Georgians were effectively
denied the vote because only those with South Ossetian passports
could participate.

They want to restore ties with Georgia, severed after a separatist
war in 1992. Georgia’s President Mikhail Saakashvili accuses Moscow
of trying to annexe part of his country and has vowed to reclaim
South Ossetia.

South Ossetia is one of several so-called "frozen conflicts" in the
former Soviet Union whose fate now appears tied up in a much larger
game of diplomatic chess over Kosovo. The UN protectorate is expected
to be offered independence from Serbia when a deadline for settling
its status expires next month.

Russia supports its Slav ally Serbia in opposing independence.

President Putin warned in September that Russia would veto any
solution that treated Kosovo differently from South Ossetia and
Georgia’s other breakaway region of Abkhazia.

Yesterday’s vote strengthens Russia’s case by underlining the UN’s
difficulty in giving precedence to the principle of self-determination
over the territorial integrity of member states.

Similar disputes are simmering in Moldova, where the pro-Moscow
Transdniester region held an independence referendum last month,
and in Nagorno-Karabakh, where the ethnic Armenian majority have
asserted their independence from Azerbaijan.

South Ossetia’s referendum comes as relations between Georgia and
Russia are already at their lowest ebb since the break-up of the
Soviet Union. Moscow has cut all transport links, imposed a trade
embargo, and refused to issue any new visas to Georgians after Tbilisi
arrested, then expelled, four Russian military officers as alleged
spies in September.

BAKU: About 52,000 cars imported to Yerevan over last five years

TREND, Azerbaijan
Nov 11 2006

About 52,000 cars imported to Yerevan over last five years

Source: Trend
Author: Trend

11.11.2006

(ARKA) – Over the last five years 52,000 cars were imported to
Yerevan, the press service of the Yerevan municipality reported.
According to it, the number of motor vehicles in Yerevan grows
annually by 12,000.

"Each year 20,000 motor vehicles enter the Armenian capital. The
number of taxis has grown.

Yerevan Mayor Yervand Zakharyan said that the growth of construction
volume, as well as absence of bypass roads cause additional problems
for road traffic.

The Yerevan mayor pointed out the necessity in a working group for
implementation of urgent scheduled activities aimed at improving the
situation with road traffic.

In the near 10 days, the relevant document will be signed. Zakharyan
pointed out that the issue of purpose use of bus stops is still
urgent. He added that the police will take measures to improve this
situation, reports Trend.

The mayor also reported that funds will be allocated for repair works
on two intersections and construction of several pedestrian subways.
About AMD 600mln are allocated for modernization and automation of
traffic lights. Zakharyan also reported that the municipality holds
negotiations with World Bank over funding the reforms in the
transport sector. ($1 – AMD 380.69).

ANKARA: EU paints mixed picture

From: "Katia M. Peltekian" <[email protected]>
Subject: ANKARA: EU paints mixed picture

The New Anatolian, Turkey
Nov 9 2006

EU paints mixed picture

The New Anatolian / Ankara

The European Commission yesterday released its progress report on
Turkey, covering the progress that has made in Turkey since the
beginning of membership talks in October 2005 and including
criticisms in various areas.

While evaluating the overall progress in Turkey, the country’s place
in fulfilling European Union membership criteria and efforts to
harmonize its laws with that of the bloc, the Commission in its
80-page document urged Ankara to take constructive steps on minority,
women’s and union’s rights, civilian-military relations, the election
system, broadcasting and publication in different languages and
especially in amending controversial Article 301 of the new Turkish
Penal Code.

Though criticizing the slow progress of reforms on the key issue of
Cyprus, the EU didn’t include in the report a suggestion to suspend
talks with Turkey if the country fails to implement the Ankara
Protocol, thereby throwing the ball of making a final decision on
continuing talks with Turkey to the leaders’ summit next month and
paving the way for the continuation of talks on the Finnish
proposals.

"Under the negotiating framework and the Accession Partnership," said
the report, "Turkey is expected to ensure continued support for
efforts to find a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem
within the United Nations framework and in line with the principles
on which the Union is founded, whilst contributing to a better
climate for a comprehensive settlement, implement fully the protocol
adapting the Ankara Agreement to the accession of the 10 new EU
member states including (Greek) Cyprus and take concrete steps for
normalization of bilateral relations with all Member States,
including the (Greek) Republic of Cyprus." The report asked Turkey to
remove all obstacles to the free movement of goods, including
restrictions on means of transport, but without mentioning a possible
suspension of talks if Turkey fails to fulfill the requirements.

The report stated, however, that Turkey’s fulfillment of the
responsibilities will affect the negotiations and should it fail to
do so, the Commission will make recommendations on the issue next
month.

The declaration also stressed that recognition of all member states
is a necessary component of the accession process and underlined the
importance it attaches to the normalization of relations between
Turkey and all EU member states, making direct reference to Greek
Cyprus.

Fine-tuned criticism of military

The European Commission made a carefully worded criticism of the
military’s role in politics in its key report published yesterday,
staying clear of heated domestic debate about secularism but saying
that more time is needed for stronger alignment of civil-military
relations with EU practices.

"Overall, limited progress has been made in aligning civil-military
relations with EU practices," said the chapter on civil-military
relations. "Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) have continued to exercise
significant political influence. Senior members of the armed forces
have expressed their opinion on domestic and foreign policy issues
including Cyprus, secularism, the Kurdish issue and on the indictment
concerning the (November 2005) Semdinli bombing."

On the Semdinli affair, when a bookstore in the southeastern town
left two dead, raising tension over claims TSK officials were
involved in the bombing, the EU was expected to make a stronger
criticism of the military. Some of the ruling Justice and Development
(AK) Party members accused then land forces commander and current
Chief of General Staff Gen. Yasar Buyukanit of having links with the
alleged bombers.

But contrary to many expectations, the report did not mention the
issue in detail. The report also did not make strong criticisms of
the recently increase in statements by top military officials in
defense of Turkey’s principle of secularism and criticizing the
ruling AK Party for not taking the rising Islamic fundamentalism
threat seriously.

Concerning the chapter on civil-military relations in the report,
European diplomats told The New Anatolian that the recently heated
debate in Turkish politics was mainly perceived as an internal debate
ahead of next year’s key presidential election and the EU did not
want to interfere in that. Diplomats also said that more time was
needed in Turkey’s democratization process to come to a point where
civil-military relations were be better aligned with EU practices.

The Commission report raised some other concerns on the issue of
civil-military relations, such as the lack of a parliamentary vote on
Turkey’s National Security Policy Document and the TSK Internal
Service Law remaining unchanged, giving the military wide space to
maneuver in domestic politics. It also underlined the need for
measures to enhance civilian control over the Gendarmerie,
strengthening parliamentary oversight of the military budget and
expenditures.

The report welcomed a law this June amending the relevant provisions
of the Military Criminal Code to assure that no civilian will be
tried in military courts in peacetime unless military personnel and
civilians commit an offense together.

The commission’s report concluded that there was not "back tracking"
but "a limited progress" in this year concerning alignment of
military relations with EU practices, and made the following
suggestion for the TSK:

"Statements by the military should only concern military, defense and
security matters and should only be made under the authority of the
government, while the civilian authorities should fully exercise
their supervisory functions in particular as regards the formulation
of the national security strategy and its implementation including
with regard to relations with neighboring countries."

Stating that the positive statement of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan in 2005 stressing the need to resolve through domestic means
what he called "the Kurdish issue" was not followed up, the EU said
in the report that there is almost no dialogue between the
authorities and locally elected politicians and furthermore, many
locally elected politicians face court challenges.

EU calls for concrete steps on minority rights

Turkey has made little progress on ensuring cultural diversity and
promoting respect for and protection of minorities in accordance with
international standards, the EU said in the progress report, urging
Ankara to take concrete and constructive steps in the issue.

In the key report on Turkey, freedom of religion, minority rights and
their protection were highlighted as the main areas of concern.

On the issue of freedom of religion, according to the progress
report, although freedom of worship continues to be generally
respected, no progress was reported on difficulties encountered by
non-Muslim religious communities.

Stressing that restrictions on the training of clergy and on foreign
clergy working in Turkey remain, the report said, "Turkish
legislation does not provide private higher religious education for
these communities," and therefore urged the reopening of the Greek
Orthodox Halki (Heybeliada) seminary and the recognition of the
"ecumenical" status of the Fener Greek Orthodox Patriarch.

There have been no developments made in relation to the situation of
the Alevis and they face difficulties opening their places of worship
(cemevis), said the report, urging Ankara to recognize cemevis and
give funding to them. Furthermore, the Union criticized the
compulsory religious instruction given to Alevi children in schools.

Another area of concern in the progress report is that although the
mandatory indication of religious affiliation on some personal
documents such as ID cards was abolished in April, such documents
still include information on religion, which according to the EU
leaves open the potential of discriminatory practices.

Furthermore on freedom of religion, Brussels called on Turkey to give
access to legal incorporation to non-Muslin religious minorities and
abolish their restricted property rights.

Touching on the problems of the Greek minority, the report stated
that they continue to encounter problems, particularly related to
education and property rights. "The Greek minority properties on the
island of Gokceada (Imvros) and Bozcaada (Tenedos) are under the
threat of confiscation and tender by the Turkish authorities," it
said.

Call for more Kurdish language broadcasting, education

On the issue of cultural rights of Kurds, the EU called on Turkey to
do more to ensure more broadcasting and education in the Kurdish
language.

Stressing that permission was granted to two local TV channels in
Diyarbakir and to one radio in Sanliurfa to broadcast in Kurdish, the
Union expressed criticism on the time restrictions, the presence of
subtitles or translations in Turkish and the absence of educational
programs teaching the Kurdish language. Stating that the Turkish
Television and Radio Corporation (TRT) has continued broadcasting in
five languages including Kurdish, the Union expressed concern over
the limited duration and scope of TRT’s broadcasts, adding that no
private broadcaster at the national level has applied to broadcast in
languages other than Turkish since the enactment of the 2004
legislation.

The Union also urged Ankara to do more in education in Kurdish,
saying, "Children whose mother tongue is not Turkish cannot learn
their mother tongue in the Turkish public schooling system. As
concerns Kurdish all private courses were also closed down in 2004.
Therefore, there are no possibilities to learn Kurdish today in the
public or private schooling system. Furthermore, there are no
measures taken to facilitate access to public services for those who
do not speak Turkish."

Touching on the overall record of Turkey in the minority rights, the
EU described it as "unchanged" and urged Ankara to determine other
minorities in Turkey besides the Jews, Armenians and Greeks who were
given the status of minorities with the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne.

"The February 2005 visit of the OSCE High Commissioner on National
Minorities (HCNM) to Ankara has not been followed up and no progress
has been made in starting a dialogue on the situation of national
minorities in Turkey," said the report, urging Ankara to include
relevant areas such as minority education, languages, the
participation of minorities in the public life and broadcasting in
minority languages to facilitate Turkey’s further alignment with
international standards and best practice in EU member states to
ensure cultural diversity and to promote respect for and protection
of minorities.

———Ara Baslik———

Need to change Article 301

Brussels also pressed for changes to Article 301 of the new Turkish
Penal Code (TCK), saying that it needed to be brought into line with
the relevant European standards.

"Some progress can be reported in the area of broadcasts in languages
other than Turkish at local and regional level," said the report.
"However, the prosecutions and convictions for the expression of
nonviolent opinion under certain provisions of the new penal code are
a cause for serious concern and may contribute to create a climate of
self-censorship in the country. This is particularly the case for
Article 301 which penalties insulting Turkishness, the republic as
well as the organs and institutions of the state. Although this
article includes a provision that expression of thought intended to
criticize should not constitute a crime, it has repeatedly been used
to prosecute non violent opinions expressed by journalists, writers,
publishers, academics and human rights activists."

‘Parliamentary immunity should be ended to fight corruption’

The European Union also urged Turkey to abolish parliamentary
immunity to better fight corruption within the country in the report.

According to the report, although there has been some limited
progress in the fight against corruption, notably on increasing
transparency in the public administration, overall corruption remains
widespread and anti-corruption authorities and policies are still
weak.

Besides the need to abolish parliamentary immunity to better fight
corruption within the country, according to the EU, Turkey also needs
to improve its legislation on financing and auditing of political
parties.

"With regard to corruption investigations carried out by the
inspection boards, the need for a prior authorization from the
hierarchy when investigating some categories of public officials
hampers the investigation," the report said, underlining the need for
better coordination of the system currently in place for combating
corruption. In line with this conclusion reached by the EU, the
25-nation bloc called on Ankara to establish a sufficient independent
body that will be responsible for the conception and monitoring the
implementation of anti-corruption measures.

Report gives Ocalan, Papadopoulos more than their due

In terminology all but guaranteed to raise hackles in Turkey, the
report refers to terrorist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) leader
Abdullah Ocalan as "Mr.Ocalan" and calls the Greek Cypriot leader
"President Papadopoulos."

The EU’s use of "Mr. Ocalan" despite the PKK’s recognition by the
Union as a terrorist group, is likely to cause anger in Turkey, a
country which seeks support from its allies in its efforts to fight
the terrorist group.

Besides the respectful title for a terrorist, the Union also calls
Greek Cypriot administration leader Tassos Papadopoulos "President
Papadopoulos," another point that could anger Turkey since the
country doesn’t recognize Greek Cyprus.

Highlights:

Civil and political rights:

– The Turkish legal framework includes a comprehensive set of
safeguards against torture and ill-treatment. Cases of torture and
ill-treatment declined over the reporting period. However, concerns
remain regarding cases outside centers, human rights violations in
the southeast and the problem of impunity.

Women’s rights:

– There has been growing public attention on the issue of women’s
rights in Turkey. However, full respect of women’s rights remains a
critical problem, particularly in the poorest areas of country. While
the legal framework is overall satisfactory, its implementation
remains inadequate.

– In parts of the southeast it still occurs that girls are not
registered at birth. This hampers the fight against forced marriage
and crimes in the name of honor since these girls and women cannot be
properly traced.

Children’s rights:

– The right to education for children, particularly girls remains a
problem in some areas.

– In late 2005, ill-treatment of children in an orphanage of the
Social Services and Child Protection Agency (SHCEK) in Malatya
revealed the shortcomings of the child protection system in Turkey.

Trade unions:

– The government submitted to social partners two legislative
proposals aimed at amending the two currently applicable laws in this
area. However, no further progress was made and no formal legislative
initiative has been taken by the government.

– As a result, the current significant shortcomings on the right to
organize and the right to collective bargaining, including the right
to strike, remain in place.

EU urges Ankara to rethink stance on Hamas

Describing Hamas as a "terrorist group," the report indirectly
criticized the AK Party receiving Hamas officials in Ankara early
this year following the Palestinian elections.

According to the progress report, although the Union stated that
"Turkey has broadly continued to align its foreign and security
policy with that of the EU?and has continued to support the Middle
East peace process," it continued by saying, "Turkey declared in
February 2006 to share the objectives EU Common Position on the
application of specific measures to combat terrorism and ensure that
its national policies would conform to that Common Position. Hamas is
on the list included in this Common Position."

On other issues in the chapter about foreign, security and defense
policy, while the Union praised Turkey’s participation in the EU-led
police missions including Bosnia-Herzegovina (EUPM), former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia (Proxima) and in Congo (EUROPOL KINSHASA) and
UN and NATO peace missions for the development of European Security
and Defense Policy (ESDP), it criticized Turkey’s resistance to
including Greek Cyprus and Malta in the EU-NATO strategic cooperation
based on the "Berlin Plus" agreement. The report also noted that
Turkey continues, for political reasons, to block Greek Cyprus’
membership in certain suppliers’ groups, such as the Wassenaar
Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use
Goods and Technologies.

Touching on Turkey’s relations with the Middle East, while the report
said that Turkey’s relations with Syria continued to develop
positively, it also praised Ankara’s efforts and concrete initiatives
to promote stability in Iraq by facilitating dialogue between U.S.
authorities and Sunni Arabs. "Turkey argues that there is a direct
link between the recent escalation of violence in the southeast of
Turkey and increased clashes between Turkish Armed Forces and the PKK
and ‘infiltration of PKK members’ from the Iraqi border," it said in
the report, saying that a significant number of troops were deployed
along the Iraqi border in order to prevent infiltration by PKK
terrorists from northern Iraq.

The report also praised Turkish efforts to encourage Iran to comply
with the demands of the international community and the country’s
support to EU efforts to obtain long-term guarantees for the
implementation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and its
Nuclear Safeguards Agreement with the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) by Iran.

The continued strong support of Turkey for the "Bonn process"
concerning the reconstruction of Afghanistan was also praised in the
report.

Call for opening Turkey’s border with Armenia

The Union, in the chapter on foreign policy, urged Turkey to open its
border with Armenia, stressing that this would be an important step
forward in the establishment of good neighborly relations between the
two countries and would boost trade relations.

While urging Turkey to open its border with Armenia, the EU cited the
lack of significant developments in relations between Turkey and
Armenia since the official exchange of letters between Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Armenian President Robert Kocharian
in April 2005.

However, the EU noted a closer alignment of Turkey’s official
position with EU positions in relation with the Southern Caucasus and
Central Asia. "Turkey has reiterated its support for the European
Neighborhood Policy. Turkey participates in the regional initiative
GUAM (Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova) with observer status.
Turkey followed closely the elections in Azerbaijan. It aligned
itself with the EU Presidency statement on the elections in
Azerbaijan on 10 November 2005," the report said.

Brussels indirectly urges removal of ‘casus belli’ resolution

In the progress report, the Union indirectly called on the Turkish
Parliament to abandon a 1995 resolution on casus belli (cause for
war) in relation to the possible extension of Greek territorial
waters.

In the text, the Commission alluded to the "casus belli" while urging
Ankara to commit to good neighborly relations through "addressing any
sources of friction with its neighbors and refrain from any action
which could negatively affect the process of peaceful settlement of
border disputes."

Reviewing the development of relations and confidence building steps
taken by Turkey and Greece, the EU progress report also noted that
measures to prevent the escalation of tension on the Aegean Sea were
taken "following the collision of Turkish and Greek military air
crafts over the Aegean in May, which caused the death of a Greek
pilot."

U.S. Policy On Armenia Will Not Change

U.S. POLICY ON ARMENIA WILL NOT CHANGE

Lragir, Armenia
Nov 9 2006

If the Democrats win the election to the U.S. Congress, the U.S. policy
on Armenia will not change. Although the executive has more powers
concerning the U.S. foreign policy, which has not changed yet,
there have been a number of elections to the Congress over this time,
which, however, did not disrupt the continuity of the U.S. Policy on
Armenia. This opinion was expressed by the U.S. Charge d’Affaires
Anthony Godfrey on November 8 in Armenia, at the moment when the
votes of the Republicans and Democrats were being counted. Anthony
Godfrey stated that the policy on Armenia will not change, and the
United States will continue to assist Armenia in building democracy.

Anthony Godfrey also stated that it is difficult to say what changes
will be made in the foreign policy of the United States generally.

Anthony Godfry says the American policy and particularly the Iraqi
issue is a matter of race, and they have to wait to see what will
happen. He says voters, including him, expect changes.

Armenian Leader, US Official Discuss Cooperation

ARMENIAN LEADER, US OFFICIAL DISCUSS COOPERATION

Public TV, Armenia
Nov 8 2006

President Robert Kocharyan has received the co-chairman of the working
group on the Armenian-US economic cooperation, Coordinator for US
Assistance to Europe and Eurasia Thomas Adams and the US deputy
ambassador to Armenia, Anthony Godfrey.

President Kocharyan expressed gratitude for US assistance to Armenia
in carrying out effective reforms.

The sides discussed a wide range of issues concerning Armenian-US
cooperation. President Kocharyan pointed out the important role of
the working group on the Armenian-US economic cooperation and said
that the group’s activity had became well-organized and the results
more pleasing.

The sides also discussed the issues of organization and conduct of
fair and just elections. The USA will continue to assist Armenia in
strengthening democracy.

Strategy Of National Security Of Armenia And Methods Of Its Developm

STRATEGY OF NATIONAL SECURITY OF ARMENIA AND METHODS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT: INTERVIEW WITH ARMENIAN DM ADVISOR

Regnum, Russia
Nov 9 2006

The press releases of the Inter-Department Commission on the
Development of the Strategy of National Security of the Republic of
Armenia report that the draft strategy has been approved by the leading
professional centers of Washington, Moscow and Brussels. The press
attache of the Armenian Defense Minister, Colonel Seyran Shakhsuvaryan
has asked the Secretary of the Commission, Maj. Gen. Hayk Kotanjyan
to give some explanations concerning the development process.

The director of this project Hayk Kotanjyan is the advisor of
the Armenian Defense Minister. He has acquired his knowledge and
experience in leading scientific centers of Russia, the US, and
Western Europe. He got the highest qualification in national security
at the Russian Academy of Public Administration, the Center for the
Methodology of International Relations Studies of the Russian FM
Diplomatic Academy and the Department of Military-Political Sciences
of the Military Academy of the Russian AF General Staff. Kotanjyan
is doctor of political sciences. He studied counter-terrorism at the
National Security School of the US National Defense University. He
is graduate of the Marshall European Center for Security Studies and
the Defense and Security Analysis Program of the Graduate School of
the RAND corporation (US).

Dr. Kotanjyan, could you give your explanations concerning the methods
of development of the Strategy of National Security of Armenia…

The Armenian Defense Ministry has been working in this sphere since
1992, since the very birth of the Armed Forces of independent Armenia,
in close cooperation with progressive experts analyzing the strategy
of transitional political processes in post-perestroika democratic
Russia. We received great assistance from our Russian colleagues from
the Center for the Methodology of International Relations Studies of
the Russian FM Diplomatic Academy and the Russian Academy of Public
Administration, who closely cooperated with experts on transitional
processes from Harvard and Yale. We also had fruitful contacts with
the experts of the Russian National and International Security Fund
and the Russian Academy of Military Sciences. The updating of the
"Basic Principles of the Military Policy of the Republic of Armenia:
The Military-Political Aspect of National Security" was started in
2000 when Serzh Sargsyan became Defense Minister.

Well aware of the Russian methods of national security concept
development, Sargsyan providently decided to enlarge the scope of
theoretical-methodological national security knowledge of our ministry
due to the leading research centers of the US and Europe.

Through fellowship programs our DM specialists studied the programs
of the US National Defense University, the RAND and the Marshall
Center. In order to keep pace with the constantly transforming
external security environment, we also studied the NATO strategy of
transformation in the international security system.

Does this mean that our strategy has been copied from the American
or Russia original?

This is an important question. The military-political leadership of
Armenia knows well what problems one Central European country faced
after just making a copy of the American document. We also know that in
some post-Soviet countries national security strategies were written
by foreign experts. The documents were later translated into national
languages, while local departments just feigned they worked on them.

The chairman of the Inter-Department Commission was indisputably right
when he said that each country has a unique security environment,
national interests and goals and peculiar ways and priorities of their
use for ensuring national security. That’s why, based on the most
advanced methodological achievements and the advice of the leading
professional schools of Russia and the West, our Commission chose the
only right way – namely, to work out the national security concept
on its own.

They in the press call the document differently: "concept" or
"strategy" of national security. Can you explain the difference?

The European tradition says that national security documents should
be worked out in two stages. They in Europe stipulate that one should,
first, develop the "concept" – to answer the question "What?"

– and then, on its basis, the "strategy" – to answer the question
"How?"

The modern methodology of national strategy development is based on
a system approach to both question: "What?" and "How?". Armenia has
chosen this dynamic model because it not only systematizes views and
theorizes on threats and counter-measures but also clearly says that
democratic reforms are the primary way to ensure the secure development
of the Armenian society.

What is the peculiarity of the Commission’s product?

In terms of the content, the strategy is peculiar for its attempt
to ensure a multi-vector balance of security orientations and to
transform the society by means of democratic reforms and integration
into the world community. One more important peculiarity is that the
Commission is simultaneously developing two interrelated products:
the Strategy of National Security and the portfolio of department
programs for ensuring its implementation in all spheres.

What is the basis of your work?

At the preparatory stage, we systematized the results of our many-year
cooperation with Russian experts. We also used our monographic research
"The Development of the National Security Concept of the Republic
of Armenia in the Context of the Regional Security Architecture of
the South Caucasus" – the work we defended at the National Security
School of the US National Defense University. The basis of our work
was the Armenian Defense Minister’s report "The Key Directions of
the Strategy of National Security of the Republic of Armenia."

Experts from Moscow, Washington and Brussels said that the DM’s
report was a well-grounded professional document and recommended it
as a basis for our project.

As the secretary of the Inter-Department Commission, how would you
characterize its work?

It is quite effective. During the first meeting the Chairman of the
Commission said that we should work professionally and transparently.

Special attention was given to the problem of methodological
compatibility of representatives of 18 different departments and MPs.

The experts of the Russian Academy of Public Administration consulted
us on the matter. US experts also helped: highly-qualified specialists
of the US National Defense University held a methodological seminar
for the deputy ministers and equivalent officials involved in the
Commission.

The on-line schedule of the Commission’s meetings says that the
Commission has considered the content of the draft twice: first,
when there was a mosaic of proposals based on the text of the DM’s
report and, then, when the edited draft was consolidated. All the
work was carried out with the use of modern computer technologies
and traditional methods of documentation.

615 proposals were made during 7 meetings and were analyzed and
included in the text through collective expert consultations with
the commissioners.

I would like to point out that most of the commissioners showed
high professionalism and responsibility for the quality of personal
contribution in the collective product. I would also like to stress
the tolerant and consolidating approach of the chairman towards the
controversial and sometimes conflicting opinions of representatives
of different departments.

The information about the Commission’s agenda said that the draft was
to be approved by leading foreign centers. Could you tell about them?

The Chairman of the Commission preferred the modern standard of
open professional discussions in the most authoritative expert
centers. In fact, the configuration of the draft approval reflects the
multi-vector character of Armenia’s security policy: Moscow, Washington
and Brussels. All our partners had been notified that the process of
approval would be nontrivial and complex. I am pleased to note that US
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Russian Security Council Secretary
Igor Ivanov and NATO officials readily responded to Serzh Sargsyan’s
official request for organizing external approval of the document.

In short, the diagnosis was as follows: the Academic Committee of
the US National Defense University – "the inter-department process
for developing the Strategy of National Security of the Republic
of Armenia and its product comply with the modern methodological
standards"; the Modern Expert Group of the national security and
international relations departments of the Russian Academy of Public
Administration – "The draft Strategy of National Security of the
Republic of Armenia is the mature product of systematized efforts of
the Inter-Department Commission"; the International Advisor Group for
Security of the NATO European members – "The draft is comprehensive
and scientifically substantiated." The recommendations of professional
schools are especially valuable. It should be noted that the experts
just recommended as they clearly understood that it is for the Armenian
authorities to develop a document of national importance.

As the director of the Institute of Strategic Studies of the Defense
Ministry, what can you say about the Institute’s role in this process?

The recently founded Institute named after General Drastamat Kanayan is
the analytical, coordinating and editorial link of the Inter-Department
Commission. Here we are analyzing and summarizing both internal and
external recommendations and are working out own proposals for the
Commission. At the same time, the development of the national security
strategy is a good instrument for calibrating the Institute’s future
activities in the sphere of national strategic studies.

What are your next steps for promoting the document?

In Nov we are planning to discuss it with the Yerevan State University
Council, the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences and experts
from scientific centers and NGOs. The Chairman of the Commission
Serzh Sargsyan has asked the rector of YSU, professor Aram Simonyan
and the president of the NAS, academic Radik Martirossyan to organize
the discussion.

By Dec we are planning to organize an open parliamentary hearing of
the document. After that, the Commission will submit the document
for the Government’s approval.

Nagorno-Karabakh sets constitutional referendum for December

Nagorno-Karabakh sets constitutional referendum for December

International Herald Tribune, France
Nov 3 2006

The Associated PressPublished: November 3, 2006

YEREVAN, Armenia: The leader of Nagorno-Karabakh, a disputed
Armenian-controlled territory in Azerbaijan, on Friday ordered a
constitutional referendum to be held next month.

President Arkady Gukasian set the referendum for Dec. 10, his office
said. The draft constitution says that Nagorno-Karabakh Republic,
also called the Republic of Artsakh, is a sovereign democratic nation.

Nagorno-Karabakh is a region in Azerbaijan that has been under the
control of Armenian and ethnic-Armenian Karabakh forces since a 1994
cease-fire ended a six-year separatist war that killed about 30,000
people and drove about 1 million from their homes.

The region’s final status has not been worked out, and years of
talks under the auspices of international mediators have brought few
visible results.

What’s good for Turkey is good for France

National Post (Canada)
November 3, 2006 Friday
National Edition

What’s good for Turkey is good for France

by Sumaira Shaikh, National Post

Yesterday, it was announced that an emergency meeting between Turkey
and the European Union had been canceled, dealing a fresh blow to
Turkey’s bid to join the EU. The problem in this case involved a
disagreement over Turkey’s relationship with Cyprus. But the setback
highlights the more general hostility toward Turkey exhibited by many
European nations. That hostility is rooted in the fact that Turkey’s
70 million people are mostly Muslim, while the EU is mostly
Christian.

The roots of this stubborn hostility were on display in October, when
the lower house of France’s legislature sought to criminalize denial
of the 1915-1917 Armenian genocide by the Ottoman Turks, a bill that
predictably caused an uproar in Turkey.

Turkey holds that the deaths of the Armenians were not the result of
an organized, premeditated slaughter. But French President Jacques
Chirac said Turkey must recognize the Armenian deaths as genocide
before it joins the EU. The campaign seems to be aimed at thwarting
Turkey’s membership in the EU for purely cynical reasons: If Turkey
gains entry, it will become the second most populous EU nation, after
Germany, with more power and leverage than France.

The Turkish parliament responded in kind, with a plan to criminalize
denial of the "Algerian genocide" by the French during 132 years of
colonization in Algeria. There was also heated talk of breaking trade
links with France. Turkey wisely abandoned these ideas: They only
would have exacerbated the dispute.

The French bill has had some benefit, though: It exposed European
double standards.

The reality is that both the Ottoman and French Empires did plenty of
bad things. Even modern-day France, for all the lectures it gives the
United States, is beset by racism and de-facto segregation of its
Arab population, problems that rose to the surface during last year’s
suburban Paris riots. If Europe doesn’t allow Turkey into the EU
because of Ankara’s attitude toward past human-rights abuses, then
everyone else should be expelled from the EU club as well. The
region’s history was a violent one, and all nations have blood on
their hands.

France’s government has its head deeper in the sand than most,
however. Last year, the French passed a law that required high-school
teachers to teach the "positive values" associated with colonialism,
and to emphasize the positive role of the French presence abroad,
especially in North Africa.

This created an uproar in former French colonies, leading Abdelaziz
Bouteflika, President of Algeria, to decline a planned friendship
treaty with France. While the offending legislation was repealed
earlier this year, the damage was done. In Canada, legislation like
this would never have even seen the light of day.

Among French politicians, the sense of history is highly selective.
You cannot have a double standard about what is history and what is
not.

The time has now come for France and its European friends to stop
bullying Turkey. They need to accept it into the EU without
hypocritical pre-conditions. No one is innocent in Europe. Everyone
has a part of history to be ashamed of, whether it is Turkey, Germany
or France.

We need to move on and be more constructive. The world is a bad
enough place, with genocides taking place right under our noses in
Darfur and elsewhere. We do little about them, perhaps because we are
too busy fighting over genocides of the past.

[email protected]

– Sumaira Shaikh is a Toronto-based writer.

German-Owned Mining Giant Remains Armenia’s Top Taxpayer

GERMAN-OWNED MINING GIANT REMAINS ARMENIA’S TOP TAXPAYER
By Emil Danielyan

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Nov 2 2006

A German-owned company mining copper and molybdenum remains Armenia’s
largest corporate taxpayer, having contributed 22.7 billion drams
($60 million) to the state treasury during the first nine months of
this year, official statistics show.

The Zangezur Copper and Molybdenum Combine continues to be followed
by two other foreign-owned companies, the ArmenTel telecommunications
operator and the ArmRosGazprom natural gas distributor. According
to the figures provided to RFE/RL by Armenian tax authorities, they
have paid 13 billion drams and 8.3 billion drams respectively during
the same period.

Also high on the official list of the country’s 300 largest taxpayers
are two fuel importing companies, two tobacco firms, the national power
utility, a mobile phone operator, the Metsamor nuclear power plant,
the Zvartnots international airport, a brandy distillery and even a
car dealership. But the amount of various taxes and customs duties
paid by each of them pales in comparison with Zangezur’s contribution
to Armenia’s national budget.

The mining giant is based in the southeastern town of Kajaran and
employs thousands of people. It was privatized in December 2004 for
$132 million by a consortium of local and foreign investors led by
the German metals group Cronimet. The latter owns 75 percent of the
company, both directly and through its Yerevan-based Makur Yerkat
smelter.

The Armenian government is on track to increase its still modest tax
and customs revenues by 20 percent to 375 billion drams (almost $1
billion) this year. It will need to achieve a similar increase next
year in order to successfully implement its 2008 budget projected to
be worth about $1.5 billion.

At the urging of the World Bank and other Western donors, the
government began publicizing two years ago the list of the top
taxpayers as part of its declared crackdown on endemic tax evasion.

It was hoped that the "name-and-shame" policy will embarrass the
country’s wealthiest citizens that are believed to grossly underreport
their earnings. Government officials and some donors say that this
measure alone has forced them to pay more taxes.

The head of the State Tax Service (STS), Felix Tsolakian, insisted
this week that no Armenian company is now off limits to tax
inspectors. "Today tax inspectors have no trouble entering one or
another business," Tsolakian told RFE/RL in an interview.

Still, the latest rankings released by his agency show that many of
Armenia’s government-connected tycoons continue to post modest profits
contrasting with their conspicuous wealth. Gagik Tsarukian, arguably
the most influential and ambitious of the so-called "oligarchs," is
a case in point. The biggest of the companies that are known to be
owned by him, Multi-Leon, occupies a lowly 76 place in the STS list,
with only 411 million drams ($1.1 million) in taxes and other duties
paid from January through August.

Another Tsarukian-controlled business, a big cement factory located
in the southern town of Ararat, paid 248 million drams, or even less
than Yerevan State University. The factory is thought to be operating
at full capacity thanks to Armenia’s construction boom and growing
cement exports to neighboring Iran and Georgia.

The modest taxes sharply contrast with sums spent by Tsarukian on
the ongoing massive distribution of wheat, potato seeds and other
agricultural aid to thousands of farmers across the country reeling
from last summer’s severe drought. The aid, heavily advertised by
Tsarukian-funded media, is being handed out under the aegis of his
Prosperous Armenia party that intends to do well in next year’s
parliamentary elections. Some leaders of Armenia’s mainstream
opposition parties have already denounced it as a large-scale vote
buying operation.