A Noble Conscience

A NOBLE CONSCIENCE
By Nahal Toosi

Associated Press
Providence Journal, Rhode Island
Nov 13 2006

In another life, Orhan Pamuk could have been an escape artist.

Spend an hour with him, and you quickly wonder if he wants to be
somewhere else, or even someone else. Ask him, and he’ll admit that
not being Orhan Pamuk is a constant fantasy.

But Pamuk has good reason to be himself these days. For years, he
has been regarded as a novelist of exceptional talent. Now, he’s a
Nobel Prize-winning novelist of exceptional talent.

What does that mean for a man who wrote he once believed there was
another Orhan somewhere?

Mostly just relief.

"The beautiful part of this prize is that I’m pleased from now on
nobody else will ask me, ‘Will you get the Nobel Prize?’ "
Pamuk says, laughing.

The Nobel is a coda to an extraordinary decade in the 30-year career
of Turkey’s most famous writer – one of steep rise in global exposure.

His works have now been translated into more than 40 languages. He has
traveled to more than 20 countries to promote them. Along the way,
he has made his share of political statements, one of which led to
a trial in Turkey on the charge of "insulting Turkishness."

Meanwhile, the drumbeat for the Nobel grew louder and more maddening.

In a recent interview at Columbia University, where he is a fellow,
Pamuk insisted that the Nobel would not change his character or work
habits, but he also expressed exhaustion with the people who comb
everything he says and writes for controversy. He seems unsure if
the Nobel will be more of a shield or a magnifying glass.

"Politics do not influence my work; politics have influenced my life,
actually," he says. "In fact, I am doing my utmost to preserve my
work from politics."

Pamuk is a tall, slender 54-year-old, with a slightly pudgy face,
almond eyes, ill-fitting glasses and rumpled hair. He laughs loudly,
isn’t above wagging his finger over questions he deems objectionable,
and describes himself as a lover of solitude with a restless
imagination.

"I have this urge to stop this life and start afresh," he says. "I
am in a train, and the train goes into a town, or it passes close
to houses. . . . You see inside the house where a man,
a family, a TV is on, they’re sitting at a table. You see a life there.

There’s an immense impulse to be there, to be them, to be like them."

Pamuk was born into a wealthy family in Istanbul, and defines himself
as Muslim "culturally," with religion never playing much of a role in
his upbringing. In his early 20s, disillusioned with his architecture
studies and painting aspirations, he decided he would write. It was
nearly a decade before he was published.

"Till the age of 30, my father gave me pocket money," he says.

His artistic skills have influenced his structurally complex, visually
piercing novels. He counts among his inspirations Proust and Tolstoy,
and says he loves philosophically and emotionally layered works such
as The Possessed and Anna Karenina.

His own lyrical, dreamlike stories – often drenched in melancholy –
seek harmony in discord, but don’t always find it.

In Snow, his most overtly political novel, Pamuk writes about the
plight of young Muslim girls who wished to wear headscarves in
school but faced legal obstacles in secular Turkey. In the book,
published in the United States in 2004, every character’s point of
view seems to have merit, and in it, both secularists and Islamists in
Turkey found much to like and hate. The topic was especially touchy,
considering the ongoing debate in Turkey over the country’s bid to
join the European Union, a move Pamuk has openly supported.

The push and pull in Turkey, a country that straddles two continents
and has deep religious and secular convictions, haunt Pamuk’s work.

Besides Snow, his best-known novels in the United States are The
Black Book and My Name Is Red. Another well-received book, Istanbul,
is part memoir, part history of the home city Pamuk adores.

Pamuk spends years exploring themes before an idea is transformed
into a book. He still writes in longhand with a fountain pen.

"One of the wonderful joys of writing novels is not the writing, but
fantasizing about other novels one day you will write," he says. "I
have notebooks, notes, so much material about the novels I may someday
write. Then, of course you realistically know you cannot write all
of these novels. But it’s like fantasizing another life.

. . . I like doing that."

He doesn’t believe his best work is behind him, but says the Nobel
is unlikely to be a crutch.

"I’m sure that after two months when I write a page that I’m not
sure about the quality, that I will be upset," he says. "I will be
tormented again if I think that the sentence I’m writing is not good.

No Nobel Prize – no nothing helps that. You’re alone there."

He hopes the Nobel, Turkey’s first, has a positive impact on other
Turkish writers, but he is not convinced that it will protect him
from future political persecution, noting that he was already very
famous when he was put on trial last year.

Pamuk was charged after telling a Swiss publication that Turkey was
unwilling to deal with painful parts of its history involving the
massacres of Armenians during World War I, which Turkey insists was
not a genocide, and the killings of many in its Kurdish population.

The charge was dropped on a technicality in January.

He insists that he is merely "a novelist" writing about what he knows
and what interests him, but that others have interpreted his works
as political commentary during what are tense times between the West
and the Muslim world.

Still, it doesn’t take much to make him say something political. It
is as if he can’t bear to not be honest.

"It’s a conscience," said Maureen Freely, who has known Pamuk for many
years and served as a translator for him. "If it’s important, he’ll say
something. It’s something he regards as a duty he can’t run away from."

Orham Pamuk will be at Brown University tomorrow as a participant
in a sold-out, three-day public event titled Strange Times, My Dear:
A Freedom-to-Write Literary Festival.

"Politics do not influence my work; politics have influenced my
life, actually. In fact, I am doing my utmost to preserve my work
from politics."

Orhan Pamuk "Politics do not influence my work; politics have
influenced my life, actually. In fact, I am doing my utmost to preserve
my work from politics."

Borusewicz: NK should be resolved based on principles of Int’l Law

Public Radio, Armenia
Nov 10 2006

Bogdan Borusewicz: The Karabakh conflict should be resolved based on
principles of international law
10.11.2006 13:47

`There is contradiction between two principles of settlement of the
Karabakh conflict. The first one is the principle of territorial
integrity. The second is the right of self-determination of peoples.
The conflict should be resolved based on the combination of these two
principles,’ Polish Senate Marshal Bogdan Borusewicz said in a press
conference in Baku.
`Poland is not party to the conflict, and I’m not a representative of
any of the sides. But I think that this conflict should be resolved
in a peaceful way, and the only possibility of the settlement of the
conflict is adherence to the provisions set by the OSCE Minsk Group.
The Group has correctly determined the steps that need to be taken
for the resolution of the conflict,’ added the Polish Senate Marshal.

Bogdan Borusewicz repeated the suggestion he made in Yerevan earlier
this week, when he had declared that Poland is ready to act as a
mediator to reduce the tension between Turkey and Armenia.

Olympiques: JO-2008: Franck Piccard Pourrait Defendre Les Couleurs D

JO-2008: FRANCK PICCARD POURRAIT DEFENDRE LES COULEURS DE L’ARMENIE EN VOILE

Agence France Presse
9 novembre 2006 jeudi 6:37 PM GMT

GRENOBLE 9 nov 2006

Le champion olympique de ski savoyard Franck Piccard a annonce jeudi
qu’il pourrait defendre les couleurs de l’Armenie dans les competitions
de voile de 470 aux jeux Olympiques de Pekin en 2008.

"J’ai decouvert la voile avec mon ami le skipper Jean-Philippe
Delapierre et il m’a propose de me lancer dans l’aventure sous
les couleurs de l’Armenie, pays qui est invite d’honneur des jeux
Olympiques de Pekin, et dont les equipes ne sont pas obligees de passer
par les epreuves de selection", a-t-il declare a l’AFP confirmant
ainsi l’information parue a la une de l’hebdomadaire l’Essor Savoyard
de vendredi 10 novembre.

"Nous avons deja dispute des courses de l’Euro Cat a Carnac et nous
avons bien marche. On va participer a des courses l’annee prochaine
sur la Côte d’Azur et surtout aux Championnats du monde de l’ete 2007
au Portugal", a-t-il dit.

Le champion de 45 ans, pour qui la voile est devenue sa "nouvelle
passion", estime qu’il y a de "nombreux points commun entre le ski
et la voile, qui sont des sports de glisse."

Son ami Delapierre et lui meme n’ont pas d’origine armenienne "mais
beaucoup de sympathie pour ce petit pays."

–Boundary_(ID_2aODBCQvrcTYFfTybesI9g )–

ANKARA: Turkish Youths Tried For Fight With Armenians In France

TURKISH YOUTHS TRIED FOR FIGHT WITH ARMENIANS IN FRANCE
By Ali Ihsan Aydin, Paris

Zaman, Turkey
Nov 7 2006

Three Turkish youths living in the city of Valence in France will
be tried after having fought with Armenians who launched a signature
campaign against Turkey.

The Turkish youths, Yilmaz Cevdet, Zengin Semih and Yilmaz Kamber,
could face a two-year jail sentence. Reportedly, the Turkish boys had
trouble finding a lawyer, even one from Lyon, due to Armenian pressure.

The incident in Valence took place in October 2004. A group of
Armenians opened a stand in front of the municipality building,
launching a signature campaign distributing leaflets.

Opposed, the Turkish youths turned to the police. After no results
from local law enforcement, they went back to the protest area and
an argument broke out between the groups, which later turned into a
fight. Some of the Armenians were reportedly injured during the fight.

Syria Calls for USA Not to Provoke Lebanese People against Foreigner

AZG Armenian Daily #211, 04/11/2006

Middle East

SYRIA CALLS FOR USA NOT TO PROVOKE LEBANESE PEOPLE AGAINST FOREIGNERS

Revolution Is Expected to Take Place in Lebanon

Tony Snow, Press Secretary of the White House, stated that Syria,
Iran and Hezbollah decided to fight the current rebellion in
Lebanon. The Bush Administration keeps stating that Syria tries
to hamper investigation of the former Lebanese PM Raffik Hariri’s
assassination case at the international court.

The abovementioned statement of the Bush Administration is conditioned
by the deepening tension in Lebanon. BBC informed that the latter is
caused by Hezbollah’s demand to have 1/3 of the parliament seats. The
movement also demand right for veto. If the demand is met, the movement
can hinder the international court investigation. In case the demand
is refused, thousand of supporters of the movement may express their
protest in the streets of Beirut.

The American fear that the destabilization of the situation in Lebanon
may deprive pro-Western PM Fouad Siniora of his power collapse of the
power. US Embassy to Syria has denied the information that a revolution
is being prepared in the country. The France Press informed that the
Syrian diplomats stated that the suppositions of the USA are merely
ridiculous. They even accused USA in destabilizing the situation
in Lebanon.

"It’s a shame that being a super-power, the USA conducts such
a miserable policy. The inner situation of Lebanon is concern of
Lebanon, solely. The Syrian diplomats stated that Syria supports the
self-governance and doesn’t intend to interfere with the home policy
of the country. Moreover, the Syrian diplomats called for the USA to
keep the rules of proper behavior and not to provoke Lebanese people
against each other and against other states.

By Petros Keshishian

Analysis: EU Gives Turkey Bad Grades

ANALYSIS: EU GIVES TURKEY BAD GRADES
By Stefan Nicola – UPI Germany Correspondent

United Press International
Nov 2 2006

BERLIN, Nov. 1 (UPI) — A new European Union report is set to give
Turkey low grades on its democratic reforms and further delay the
country’s EU accession, a process already under scrutiny by most
of Europe.

An unnamed EU official told the Financial Times Germany newspaper
he was surprised that Turkey was so significantly behind in its
democratization process.

"We would have hoped that Turkey would have delivered a lot more during
the past 18 months, certainly since the beginning of negotiations in
October last year," the official said. "If Turkey had been moving
more, if there was greater freedom of expression, if there wasn’t
any torture, things would be a lot more promising."

The official report, which the newspaper said it has seen, will be
presented next week. It said "prosecutions and convictions for the
expression of non-violent opinion … are a cause for serious concern,"
although on the weekend, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
said he has no plans to change the penal code for such cases, the
newspaper reported.

Such bad grades for Turkey are by no means a surprise, experts say.

"Since the beginning of the accession negotiations, Turkey and the EU
have constantly distanced themselves from each other," Heinz Kramer,
Turkey expert at the German Institute for International and Security
Affairs, a Berlin-based think tank, told United Press International.

"That’s also because the accession process within the EU has not much
or only half-hearted backing."

Public support for Turkey’s EU membership is at an all time low,
with less than one in three Europeans supporting it.

"Large parts of the population and — mostly conservative — political
elites feel that Turkey does not belong to Europe," Kramer said.

A country with unsolved regional conflicts and roughly 70 million
citizens, nearly all of them Muslims, Turkey is seen by many European
governments as a burden, rather than an asset to the EU.

France, Austria, the Netherlands, Denmark and Slovakia are among
the most outspoken opponents, with Paris speaking loudest. In
what observers say was a bid to bank on anti-Turkey sentiments,
France earlier this month adopted a bill that makes it a crime to
deny that an Armenian genocide occurred in Turkey during World War
I, a move that was criticized in most of Europe. France is home to
roughly 500,000 people whose families came from Armenia, many of them
descendants of families that experienced the 1915-1923 violence that
killed some 1.5 million people. Turkey denies that genocide took place.

Another unresolved issue involves the Republic of Cyprus.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently said that if Turkey wants
to be accepted into the EU, Ankara would have to open its ports to
Cypriots and recognize the Republic of Cyprus, an EU member.

Cyprus, a popular Mediterranean tourist destination, has been
divided into a Republic of Cyprus — the Greek Cypriot south —
and a Turkish-occupied north since a 1974 Turkish invasion.

Merkel has been critical of Turkey’s EU accession and favors the
model of a "privileged partnership" instead, although her coalition
government officially endorses the accession process.

Finland, which currently holds the rotating the EU presidency, has
been beefing up efforts to prevent a possible escalation of the Cyprus
crisis, wanted by "neither the EU nor Turkey," Kramer said.

Within the EU, the supporters of a Turkey membership, including Spain
and Britain, argue Turkey could serve as a bridge to the Islamic world,
and fuel democratization efforts in the region. Most EU governments,
however, feel the enlargement process, with Croatia becoming a
member soon, has reached its limits, and pointing to Turkey’s reform
shortcomings is an easy way out of a quick accession.

But the EU, with its half-hearted support of the Turkish accession
process, is also to blame for the lack of reforms in Turkey, Kramer
said.

"In Ankara, politicians think: ‘Why should we make all these efforts
if in the end, nothing comes out of it,’" he told UPI. "From how it
looks now, it may only be a question of time until the whole process
becomes deadlocked."

State-Adopted Documents Not Satisfactory For Assisting With Informat

STATE-ADOPTED DOCUMENTS NOT SATISFACTORY FOR ASSISTING WITH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INTRODUCTION

Noyan Tapan
Nov 01 2006

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 1, NOYAN TAPAN. The results of a survey conducted
in 14 Armenian ministries (of foreign affairs, education and science,
finance and economy, and others), and big universities (the American
University of Armenia, Yerevan State University, and others) show that
the documents adopted by the state for introduction of information
technologies are not satisfactory. Tagui Tumanyan, of the Center for
Information Law and Policy (CILP), stated this on October 31 during
the two-day international conference "Open Source Software Policy
Importance for Information Society Development". According to her,
among such documents are the concept of IT industry development and
the strategy of e-document circulation introduction adopted by the
Armenian government, under which pilot programs are being implemented
in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Finance and Economy
and some other ministries. In these programs, open source software
packages (Linux, Open Office) are used in intradepartmental networks
with the assistance of donor organizations. The speaker noted that 71%
of the organizations surveyed said that they have no IT use policy,
which, in the words of T. Tumanyan, reflects the imperfection of the
state policy on IT use. According to 22% of those surveyed, they try to
develop such a policy for their organizations. Only 7% said that they
use a policy. 29% of surveyed said that 80% of software packages used
by them are licensed, another 29% said that 30% of the packages used
are licensed. 35% of the state governance and educational organizations
surveyed expressed their willingnes to use open source softaware, 29%
said that they are ready to do this, if Microsoft requires that its
licensed software packages be used. 7% said they do not trust open
source software in terms of safety, and 29% replied that they have
not yet decided whether to use open source softaware or not. T.
Tumanyan indicated the following common fact: the internal budgets
of those surveyed did not envisage money for refreshing their software.

Thanks For Armenia’s Balanced Approach

THANKS FOR ARMENIA’S BALANCED APPROACH

AZG Armenian Daily
31/10/2006

Chairman of the National Assembly Tigran Torosian received yesterday
Georgian ambassador to Armenia Revaz Gechachiladze. According to
NA information center, the Georgian ambassador thanked the Armenian
parliament for its balanced, restrained and acceptable approach during
the Georgian-Russian crisis. Tigran Torosian, on his part, expressed
hope that Georgia and Russia will soon overcome the crisis and assured
that Armenia is ready to contribute to a solution. Torosian stated that
our country was always for peace and prosperity in the region. They
also discussed the OSCE report on stability in the South Caucasus
published in San Marino on October 17.

Ruben Hovsepian Elected Prefect Of Yerevan District

RUBEN HOVSEPIAN ELECTED PREFECT OF YEREVAN DISTRICT

Armenpress
Oct 30 2006

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 30, ARMENPRESS: According to preliminary returns
of October 29 mayoral election in Yerevan Achapnyak district,
a non-partisan Ruben Hovsepian, was elected prefect. He received
13,930 votes out of 18,935 ballots.

Iskhan Arshakian from the People’s Path party received 935 votes
and Gagik Sarkisian from the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF)
received 2,146 votes. The voter turnout was 25 percent.

A spokeswoman for Armenian Central Election Commission (CEC) said
654 ballots were invalidated.

Ruben Hovsepian is the brother of Armenia’s prosecutor general Aghvan
Hovsepian.

ANKARA: PvdA Takes A Step Back; Immigrants Cautious

PVDA TAKES A STEP BACK; IMMIGRANTS CAUTIOUS
By Basri Dogan

Kitsap Sun, WA
Oct 30 2006

The Dutch Social Democrat Labor Party (PvdA) has backpedaled about
genocide allegations; this after it had removed the names of Turkish
deputies from its electoral lists prior to general elections on Nov.
22 on the grounds that they did not recognize an Armenian genocide.

In a notice distributed to party members, the PvdA administration
termed the 1915 incidents as a "massacre" admitting that no legal
genocide had taken place.

However, Turkish immigrants in the country found party’s attitude
insincere, feeling that the party acted out of political concerns.

In a letter to Amsterdam and Rotterdam party groups, PvdA leader Michel
Van Hulten said there had been massacres following the events in 1915;
however, there had been no legal genocide.

Van Hulten wrote the letter after he met with Turkish origin members
in the party and indicated that there had been a change in the party’s
opinion about an Armenian genocide.

When asked about the party’s opinion, Hulten quoted Turkish origin
candidate Nebahat Albayrak who said, "There were massacres; however,
there is no genocide in legal terms."

Hulten’s letter also mentioned that historians and jurists should
discuss this issue, and added that as the PvdA, they are against the
adoption of the Armenian bill the French National Assembly passed
earlier this month.