Russia’s Putin Pledges To Attract 300,000 Back To Russia By 2010

RUSSIA’S PUTIN PLEDGES TO ATTRACT 300,000 BACK TO RUSSIA BY 2010

Deutsche Presse-Agentur
October 24, 2006 Tuesday 4:28 PM EST

DPA x Russia Society Russia’s Putin pledges to attract 300,000 back
to Russia by 2010 Moscow Amid an unprecedented demographic crisis,
Russia proposed Tuesday to repatriate 300,000 Russians living abroad
as President Vladimir Putin vowed to make it easier for all foreigners
to live and work in the notoriously immigrant-unfriendly country.

Putin, speaking Tuesday at the opening ceremonies of the so-called
Congress of Compatriots in St. Petersburg, promised measures to
increase immigration, to be introduced January 15.

His comments followed a pledge by Federal Migration Service head
Konstantin Romodanovsky to spend nearly 200 million dollars to lure
50,000 native Russians to the country in 2007. The following years
would respectively see 100,000 and 150,000 return.

To attract people back to Russia, Romodanovsky told government-
controlled newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta on Tuesday, the service would

try to concentrate immigration in 12 of Russia’s 89 regions and open
a number of offices in countries including Germany.

The migration service’s five existing representative offices,
in contrast, are all in former Soviet countries: Armenia, Latvia,
Kyrgyzstan, Tadjikistan and Turmenistan.

Since the fall of the Soviet Union, Russians have immigrated in droves
to the West. An estimated 200,000 Russian natives live in Germany.

Many of the regions designated special resettlement zones are in
Siberia, and others like the Tver region, north-west of Moscow, are
suffering from rampant depopulation. None of the 21 ethnic republics –
inhabited by non-Russian indigenous groups – was on the list.

Russia’s population has fallen to 142 million from 149 million in
the last 14 years. Losing 700,000 people per year, the UN says Russia

could be home to a mere 80 to 100 million by 2050.

Siberia and the Far East have always been among Russia’s least-
populated areas, and many here fear China will overflow into Siberia,

overwhelming the Russian population. The ethnic republics, on the
other hand, have seen positive growth in recent years.

Putin noted that to sustain an economy Russia needed to see immigration
numbers jump, no matter the ethnicity of the newcomers.

"In the modern world, a country’s economy, not its military, determines
its power and potential for development," the Russian leader said.

"Leading Russian companies will have to draw qualified workers without
regard to their ethnicity."

But with a surge in racially-motivated violence in recent years,
Putin’s hopes conflict with present realities. This year alone has
seen over 20 hate killings, and a St. Petersburg court last week
acquitted 17 in the 2004 murder of a Vietnamese student.

The Russian president, however, promised to simplify legalization
procedures and improve social benefits for all immigrants in Russia,
beginning January 15.

The speech came the same day figures showed that 5,000 Georgian
immigrants had been deported back to the Caucasus nation this year.

Putin also said the government would step up its efforts to protect
the Russian language and its speakers across the former Soviet Union.

On Tuesday, Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev ordered his country’s
parliament to consider switching from the Cyrillic alphabet, which
is used in Russia, to Latin letters.

"I think we have to return to the question of moving to the Latin
alphabet," Nazarbayev said, Interfax reported.

But Nazarbayev, one of Putin’s closest allies, also said students
should be taught three languages in Kazakh schools: Kazakh, English
and Russian.

Life To Better In Two Three Years Time

LIFE TO BETTER IN TWO-THREE YEARS TIME

A1+
[07:19 pm] 24 October, 2006

Today, NA Speaker Tigran Torosyan met with Head of the WB Yerevan
office Roger Robinson whose mission in Armenia comes to an end.

Mr. Robinson thanked the NA Speaker for 4.5-year work mutually
beneficial for the two sides underlining that our country has had
serious achievements and stable development over these years.

NA Speaker Tigran Torosyan wished Mr. Robinson good luck in all his
further initiatives and noted that the countries of post-Soviet period
attached great importance to economic developments whereas the future
success and well-being of any country is determined by political,
social and economic amendments.

The NA Speaker mentioned that the amendments in social life may lead
to success in 2-3 years’ time providing perfect opportunities for
better life.

Azerbaijan: A Political Education

AZERBAIJAN: A POLITICAL EDUCATION
Leyla Amirova 10/22/06

EurasiaNet, NY
Oct 22 2006

n January 2006, Turan Aliev and Namiq Feiziev thought they had won a
battle for the opposition in Azerbaijan. They gave up a three-week
hunger strike, believing they had overturned their university
expulsions and wrenched from authorities a concession that students
should not be punished for their political views.

"Today was a victory for justice," Aliev said.

By August, the two young men were in Norway, hoping to win political
asylum.

What happened in between, critics of President Ilham Aliev’s government
say, shows just how concerned the regime is with the emergence of a
new generation of young activists.

"Azeri leaders fear the expansion of youth movements and showed their
resolve to punish any dissent by the example of the two young expelled
students," says Leyla Yunus, director of the Institute of Peace and
Democracy, a civil-society group close to opposition circles.

Today, instead of "victory" for opponents of Aliev’s heavy-handed
rule, it looks like business as usual in Azeri universities. For
students and teachers alike, that means avoiding opposition activity
and professing public support for the ruling Yeni Azerbaijan party.

STARVING FOR JUSTICE

Although open dissent is rare in Azeri academia, universities are
a potential center of activism. Some youth groups work closely with
opposition parties, and during the 2005 parliamentary election campaign
a number of young activists were arrested.

As the 2005-2006 academic year began, Turan Aliev was a fourth-year
student at Baku State University; Feiziev was in his fourth year at
Azerbaijan State Pedagogical University. They were also active in the
opposition, Aliev in the Popular Front party and Feiziev in the Yeni
Fikir youth organization.

Popular Front, along with Musavat and the Democratic Party of
Azerbaijan, was part of the Azadlig coalition, the largest opposition
group to compete in the November 2005 parliamentary election. The
governing party won nearly half the seats, well ahead of Azadlig,
prompting sharp opposition protests. Yeni Fikir – one of the largest
youth organizations in the country, with a claimed membership of
2,000 – often cooperates with Azadlig. In August and September 2005
its leader, Ruslan Bashirli, and two of his deputies were arrested on
charges of plotting with Armenian security agents to overthrow the
Azeri government. Bashirli was sentenced to seven years in prison;
the others received shorter terms.

By the end of 2005, both Aliev and Feiziev had been kicked out of
university. Claiming the expulsions were politically motivated,
they joined other opposition activists in a hunger strike.

The protest attracted international calls for the students’
reinstatement. After a Jan. 19 meeting attended by U.S., British,
and Norwegian diplomats and representatives of the Council of Europe
and Azeri civil society, Education Minister Mardanov said Aliev and
Feiziev would be allowed to resume their education, although they
would have to repeat a year to make up for missed classes.

"This victory demonstrates that a new generation has appeared on
the political scene," opposition supporter Hikmet Hadjizade said,
EurasiaNet.org reported.

But Mardanov’s decision was ignored by the heads of the two
universities. Instead of returning to his study of international
relations, Aliev was ordered to join the army.

"The Narimanov district military registration and enlistment office
called me up for urgent military service," he said. University students
are exempt from conscription; Aliev appealed to the university to
clarify his situation, without success.

"It turned out that I was not a student after all," he said.

Aliev said the expulsion order issued by Baku State Rector Abel
Maharramov cited his urging fellow students to join in street protests,
truancy, posting unlawful documents on bulletin boards and "gross
violation of university rules."

Maharramov was quoted by the Trend news agency as saying Aliev was
expelled for violating internal university rules. The rector also
reportedly mentioned the student’s on-campus political activity,
such as distributing materials and putting up posters.

Maharramov said Aliev was expelled "for having violated discipline.

But before that he had been warned several times," Trend reported.

"I had good examination results and had no problems on the academic
side," Aliev said. "Students who have close contacts with opposition
parties are subjected to unreasonable pressure; they are challenged
by invented academic difficulties. All these measures aim to suppress
youth movements that always stand at the vanguard of the democratic
fight."

Feiziev, who had been studying history at the pedagogical university,
did fail an exam in the summer of 2005, but he claimed he was expelled
without the requisite three warnings. He also said he was fined the
equivalent of $20 for having insulted and threatened to kill the
dean of his university’s philological faculty. Like Aliev, he says
his political activity was the true reason for the university’s action.

According to a EurasiaNet.com report, Education Ministry spokesman
Bayram Huseynzade said the students’ participation in opposition
rallies and distribution of leaflets violated university rules, but he
insisted they were expelled for poor grades and disciplinary problems.

"Hopefully, they will be able to continue their studies at a Norwegian
university," says Seymur Gaziyev of the Platform of Azerbaijan Youth
coalition.

MANDATORY ACTIVISM

Opposition figures and advocates for democratic change in Azerbaijan
believe Ilhan Aliev’s government is concerned by the activities of
young opponents of the regime.

"The authorities put obstacles in the way of the activities of
dissenting youth, trying things like expulsion from university,"
says Emin Alisoy, head of the Musavat party’s youth branch.

Despite the watchful presence of the ruling party, the number of youth
groups in Azerbaijan keeps growing. One of the most vocal called on
supporters to rally against corruption and police violence on Oct. 18,
the anniversary of Azerbaijan’s independence from the Soviet Union.

"As the new academic year starts we will try again to get youth
actively involved in the social and political life of the country,"
despite Baku city officials denying permission to hold the event,
said Ali Ismayilov, chairman of the Yox ("No") organization.

But the march never happened. On 17 October Ismayilov was detained
by police for several hours. He claims to have been warned by a
high-ranking police officer that he would face severe punishment if
the march took place.

Cases like these and the reprisals against Aliev and Feiziev appear
to have dampened some students’ enthusiasm for open opposition.

"I share the views of Musavat and even participated in their protest
acts. But I was lucky that no one in the university knew that I
had participated in the meetings, like Aliev," says one student who
requested anonymity.

"After Aliev’s expulsion from our university, I stopped attending
opposition events," this student says. "I didn’t want to put my career
at stake."

Many students are active on behalf of the ruling party, chiefly because
they feel there is no choice. Sabina Mammadova, a 2005 graduate of
Baku State University, recalling having to walk out on a lecture to
attend a mandatory party meeting.

"We were afraid not to go [to the meeting] because it might have
reflected on our exams," she says.

Teachers have also reportedly lost their jobs for their political
activity. Opposition parliamentary deputy Nasib Nasibli alleges that
three professors at Baku State, Kamil Vali Narimanoglu, Khaladdin
Ibrahimli, and Jahangir Amirov, were fired for their political views
after last year’s elections.

Educators at all levels are expected to toe the ruling-party line.

Independent-minded university teachers can sometimes find a haven in
one of Baku’s private institutions, such as Western University or
Khazar University, which enjoy far more leeway in personnel policy
than state schools.

Still, even at private universities opposition sympathizers seldom
make an open show of their beliefs. "The state sometimes has reason to
be dissatisfied with oppositionist teachers," says Islam Gahramanov,
a professor at the pedagogical university and an opposition supporter.

"I agree that young people needn’t be involved in political activity.

We are at university to teach and not to pursue politics."

EU does not want Armenia to stand apart from regional projects

EU does not want Armenia to stand apart from regional projects

ArmRadio.am
20.10.2006 11:35

"Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey, who are included in the TRACECA,
support the Baku-Tbilisi-Akhalkalak-Kars railway project. However,
the European Union does not support the idea, " National Secretary of
TRACECA Intergovernmental Commission of Azerbaijan Akif Mustafaev said,
Azeri APA agency reports. In his words, the EU does not want Armenia
to stand apart from regional projects. The EU demands to continue
construction of the railway passing through Armenia instead of the
Baku-Tbilisi- Akhalkalak-Kars. "It is, however, impossible before the
settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. The fact that separate
countries do not wish to finance the project will have no impact on its
accomplishment. Countries participating in the project have already
expressed willingness to provide means for implementation of works,"
Mustafaev declared. To remind, the project costs about $350 million.

Oskanyan intends to leave post of FM on eve of elections

RA FM INTENDS TO LEAVE POST OF FOREIGN MINISTER ON THE EVE OF
ELECTIONS

ARMINFO News Agency
October 19, 2006 Thursday

RA FM, Vardan Oskanyan, intends to leave the post of Foreign Minister
on the eve of elections in the Republic, he said in a interview to the
"Haikakan Zhamanak" newspaper.

According to him, it is 10 years on the eve of elections since he
takes up the post of the Minister and it would be incorrect for him
to hold it within the next 5 years. "A person, heading the FM, is to
be changed", V. Oskanyan emphasized. He does not agree with rumors,
according to which the RA FM intends to stand for the President
post in 2008. "I have no decided yet what I will do after I leave
the Minister post, but I know for sure that I want to see Armenia,
where I and my children live, a normal country", V. Oskanyan said.

He reminded that he was mainly engaged in a foreign policy in view
of his position and he has started talking of internal problems very
recently since "elections are coming and I see serious problems",
among which he called the necessity to form a political field,
to eliminate the barrier between the authorities and the society,
the authorities and the people.

New Encyclopedia for Armenian Readers

AZG Armenian Daily #201, 21/10/2006

Bookshelf

NEW ENCYCLOPEDIA FOR ARMENIAN READERS

The presentation of the third volume of "The Family Encyclopedia"
took place at RA National Academy of Sciences, yesterday. The book was
published at "Armencyclopedia" publishing house. The experts elaborated
the third volume in about 10 years. The first volume is entitled
"House Wife," the second one was "Popular Medical Encyclopedia." The
second volume is dedicated to the flora and fauna of Armenia.

Hovhannes Ayvazian, editor-in-chief of the publishing house, the
collection is meant to be used in everyday life, at home, etc.

The third volume includes the description of not only Armenia’s nature
but also that of the Armenian Highland. The volume has been published
in 3000 copies. In total the program cost AMD 24 million. The book
will be sold at AMD 10000 in the book stores.

Hovhannes Ayvazian added that the encyclopedia help to get familiarized
with the nature of our country and with its environment. We are using
our herbal, animal, mineral and water resources very badly. Today,
we face the dnager of desertization," H. Ayvazian said. He added that
the young generation needs to get ecological education and expressed
hope that the book will greatly help in that.

The encyclopedia includes the photos of Tigran Babayan made in the
Western Armenia.

By Tamar Minasian

The Right To Deny Genocide

THE RIGHT TO DENY GENOCIDE
By Timothy Garton Ash

Los Angeles Times, CA
Oct 19 2006

Passing laws that criminalize denying past atrocities is no way to
address historical grievances.

WHAT A magnificent blow for truth, justice and humanity the French
National Assembly has struck. Last week, it voted for a bill that
would make it a crime to deny that the Turks committed genocide
against the Armenians during World War I. Bravo! Chapeau bas! Vive
la France! But let this only be a beginning in a brave new chapter
of European history.

Let Britain’s Parliament now make it a crime to deny that it was
Russians who murdered Polish officers at Katyn in 1940. Let the
Turkish parliament make it a crime to deny that France used torture
against insurgents in Algeria. Let the German parliament pass a bill
making it a crime to deny the existence of the Soviet gulag. Let the
Irish parliament criminalize denial of the horrors of the Spanish
Inquisition. Let the Spanish parliament mandate a minimum of 10 years
imprisonment for anyone who claims that the Serbs did not attempt
genocide against Albanians in Kosovo.

ADVERTISEMENT And the European Parliament should pass into European
law a bill making it obligatory to describe as genocide the American
colonists’ treatment of American Indians. The only pity is that we,
in the European Union, can’t impose the death sentence for these
heinous thought crimes. But perhaps, with time, we may change that too.

Oh brave new Europe! It is entirely beyond me how anyone in their
right mind – apart, of course, from a French Armenian lobbyist –
can regard this proposed bill, which will almost certainly be voted
down in the upper house of the French parliament, as a progressive
and enlightened step.

What right has France to prescribe by law the correct historical
terminology to characterize what another nation did to a third nation
90 years ago? If the French parliament passed a law making it a crime
to deny the complicity of Vichy France in the deportation to the death
camps of French Jews, I would still argue that this was a mistake,
but I could respect the self-critical moral impulse behind it. This
bill, by contrast, has no more moral or historical justification than
any of the other suggestions I have just made.

In an article last Friday, the Guardian averred that "supporters
of the law are doubtless motivated by a sincere desire to redress
a 90-year-old injustice." I wish I could be so confident. Currying
favor with French Armenian voters and putting another obstacle in
the way of Turkey joining the EU might be suggested as other motives.

It will be obvious to every intelligent reader that my argument
has nothing to do with questioning the suffering of the Armenians
who were massacred, expelled or felt impelled to flee in fear of
their lives during and after World War I. Their fate at the hands
of the Turks was terrible and has been too little recalled in the
mainstream of European memory. Reputable historians and writers have
made a strong case that those events deserve the label of genocide,
as it has been defined since 1945. In fact, this year’s winner of the
Nobel Prize in Literature, Orhan Pamuk, and other Turkish writers have
been prosecuted under the Turkish penal code for daring to suggest
exactly that. That is significantly worse than the intended effects
of the new French bill. But two wrongs don’t make a right.

No one can legislate historical truth. Insofar as historical truth
can be established at all, it must be found by unfettered historical
research, with historians arguing over the evidence and the facts,
testing and disputing each other’s claims without fear of prosecution
or persecution.

In the tense ideological politics of our time, this proposed bill is
a step in exactly the wrong direction. How can we credibly criticize
Turkey, Egypt or other states for curbing free speech, through the
legislated protection of historical, national or religious shibboleths,
if we are doing ever more of it ourselves?

Far from creating new, legally enforced taboos about history, national
identity and religion, those European nations that have them should
repeal not only their blasphemy laws but also their laws on Holocaust
denial. Otherwise, a charge of double standards is impossible to
refute.

I recently heard the French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy going
through some impressive intellectual contortions to explain why he
opposed any laws restricting criticism of religion but supported
those on Holocaust denial. It was one thing, he argued, to question
a religious belief, quite another to deny a historical fact. But this
won’t wash. Historical facts are established precisely by their being
disputed and tested against the evidence. Without that process of
contention – up to and including the revisionist extreme of outright
denial – we would never discover which facts are truly hard.

Such consistency requires painful decisions. For example, I have
nothing but abhorrence for some of David Irving’s recorded views about
Nazi Germany’s attempted extermination of the Jews, but I am quite
certain that he should not be sitting in an Austrian jail as a result
of them. You may riposte that the falsehood of some of his claims was
established by a trial in a British court. Yes, but that was not the
British state prosecuting him for Holocaust denial. It was Irving suing
another historian who suggested that he was a Holocaust denier. He was
trying to curb free and fair historical debate; the court defended it.

Only when we are prepared to allow our own most sacred cows to be
poked in the eye can we credibly demand that Islamists, Turks and
others do the same. This is a time not for erecting taboos but for
dismantling them. We must practice what we preach.

TIMOTHY GARTON ASH is professor of European studies at Oxford
University and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford
University.

IT Month Summed Up In Yerevan

IT MONTH SUMMED UP IN YEREVAN

Panorama.am
16:57 18/10/06

The main task of the development of information technologies in
Armenia at the present phase is formation of information community,
Ara Hakobyan, adviser to the Armenian prime minister, told a press
conference today. In his words, it is necessary to qualitatively
change the policy and dispositions to IT to attract the community and
investors to the field which will eventually result in economic growth
of the country. He said IT ratio in GDP makes up 2%, which he said is
"not bad."

Summing up of IT month in Armenia, which ran from September 15
to October 15, the adviser to the head of the government said the
participation involved large geographic scope.

Ara Hakobyan underscored cooperation agreements with Sun Microsystems
and with Incubator of Enterprises, Unions of Information Technologies
of Armenia and an identical organization in Egypt. Hakobyan said the
mentioned documents open opportunities for educational and research
centers in the region and on the international level."

Genocide Armenien : Aznavour Prend Ses Distances Avec Le Vote De L’A

GENOCIDE ARMENIEN : AZNAVOUR PREND SES DISTANCES AVEC LE VOTE DE L’ASSEMBLEE

Agence France Presse
17 octobre 2006 mardi 10:08 PM GMT

Champion de la cause armenienne et vedette de la chanson
internationale, Charles Aznavour a pris ses distances mardi a La
Havane avec le vote en première lecture par le parlement francais
d’une loi reprimant la negation du genocide armenien.

Interroge sur ce point lors d’une conference de presse au terme de
son sejour dans la capitale cubaine, le chanteur francais d’origine
armenienne a estime que "la loi contre le negationisme devrait etre
votee pour tous les crimes et non pas particulièrement pour les
Armeniens, parce que sinon cela fait un drôle d’effet".

"Je suis ravi qu’on y ait pense, mais j’ai quand meme, comme vous le
voyez, une certaine restriction, parce que j’ai l’impression qu’on
oublie d’autres genocides", a-t-il ajoute.

Charles Aznavour, 82 ans, concluait mardi un sejour de dix jours
consacre a l’enregistrement d’un nouvel album realise avec le pianiste
virtuose et compositeur cubain Jesus "Chucho" Valdes.

A propos d’Orhan Pamuk, l’ecrivain turc laureat du prix Nobel 2006
de litterature, Charles Aznavour s’est declare "d’abord heureux qu’un
auteur lointain recoive cet honneur".

"D’autre part, je ne peux qu’etre heureux que ce soit lui, car il
est envers et contre tout justement dans la bonne direction pour la
possibilite de la reconnaissance du genocide armenien" par la Turquie,
a-t-il ajoute.

Les deputes francais ont adopte jeudi en première lecture une
proposition de loi presentee par les socialistes, rendant passible
d’un an de prison et d’une amende de 45.000 euros la negation du
genocide armenien, provoquant la colère d’Ankara et la reprobation
de la Commission europeenne.

Les massacres et deportations d’Armeniens entre 1915 et 1917 dans
l’Empire ottoman ont fait plus de 1,5 million de morts selon les
Armeniens, 250.000 a 500.000 selon la Turquie, qui recuse la notion
de genocide.

–Boundary_(ID_C0svUonAu6gWyZFHmIma8A)- –

Turkey Intends To Amend Article 301 Of The Penal Code

TURKEY INTENDS TO AMEND ARTICLE 301 OF THE PENAL CODE

Public Radio, Armenia
Oct 18 2006

Turkey intends to amend Article 301of the Penal Code, which envisages
considerable restriction of freedom of speech, Turkish Foreign Minister
Abdullah Gul declared during Turkey-EU meeting in Luxemburg.

In his words, Turkey will undertake the reformation of the Penal Code
after November 8, when the report on Turkey’s progress towards the
European Union is to be published.