Author Speaks With Students

AUTHOR SPEAKS WITH STUDENTS
By Jesse Mclean For The Observer
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor -Version: 8.1 — ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Sarnia Observer, Canada
June 12 2008

A celebrated Canadian author spoke to a group of students at SCITS
recently about overcoming adversity and pursuing your dreams.

Marsha Skrypuch, a Brantford-based author who crafts award-winning
fiction about historic atrocities, spoke with the school’s book club
and two English classes.

"Her personal story was that she could not read, but kept it secret
from her teachers and classmates," said librarian Jan Turnbull who
organized the event.

Skrypuch’s illiteracy was eventually discovered after a standardized
test.

"So, she taught herself to read when she was in the Grade 4," said
Turnbull. "She showed the students that things don’t come easy,
but that you can’t give up."

Students were entranced by Skrypuch’s performance, Turnbull said,
which also focused on researching her works on the Armenian genocide
and Ukrainian famine during the early 1930s.

"You could hear a pin drop, (the students) were so intent on
listening," Turnbull said.

SCITS students’ book club, the Coffee Club, are currently reading
one of Skrypuch’s books. The author gave each student a personal
dedication in their own copies.

The same week, Skrypuch received a state award from Ukrainian President
Victor Yushchenko for her famine-inspired story, The Rings.

Bring On The Apocalypse: Essays On Self-Destruction

BRING ON THE APOCALYPSE: ESSAYS ON SELF-DESTRUCTION
JAY SMITH

[email protected]
VUE Weekly, Canada
June 12 2008

The back jacket of George Monbiot’s latest book calls him "one of the
world’s most influential radical thinkers": there aren’t too many
people in the world for whom that would be a tame description. The
Guardian columnist, hardly a household name in North America, just
might become one after he attempted a very public citizen’s arrest of
John Bolton, former US representative to the UN last week. (Bolton,
Monbiot attests, has violated international law in his support of
the invasion of Iraq. Speaking at the Hay Festival in the UK, Bolton
escaped the arrest attempt easily thanks to his bodyguards.)

And, according to Monbiot’s website, he’s taken a metal spike in the
foot during a roads protest, been stung into a coma by hornets and
has been pronounced clinically dead in Kenya after having contracted
cerebral malaria. In every sense easily imaginable, he’s a statistical
outlier in the field of journalism. And this is even before you get
into the man’s politics.

Being the renegade that he is, Monbiot puts a tremendous amount of
his writing on his website (monbiot.com), including his columns for
The Guardian. Accordingly, the publication of Bring on the Apocalypse,
especially with its Canadian subtitle (the American edition seems to
be subtitled "collected writing"), is not exactly the delight that
it would be were his columns not so easily available.

These sorts of publications are always a bit awkward. The essays
in Bring on the Apocalypse are short, just as one would expect
from a collection of newspaper columns. This certainly doesn’t
mean that they don’t pack the proverbial punch–Monbiot is rightly
acclaimed for his ability to concentrate research, statistics and
insight into short pieces that transform how his readers look upon
whatever subject Monbiot has set out to illuminate. A book full of
five-minute reads has its place. It is, however, somewhat frustrating
that the eponymous apocalypse is never overtly deduced. In lieu of
an overarching argument, the book is divided into six "arguments"
which are, respectively, God, Nature, War, Power, Money and Culture.

Particularly in the first three arguments, Monbiot proves himself
one of the most engaging writers around. Although the essays about
the unbelievable deception involved in the Bush administration’s
"justification" of the invasion of Iraq have a decidedly weaker
effect almost six years following their original publication,
Monbiot nevertheless enflames. And his targets are broad: he attacks
(and tracks) the "science" behind the climate change deniers, argues
that the Americans are in grave violation of international law for
using chemical weapons in Iraq (specifically, white phosphorus,
considered a chemical weapon when used against humans) and calls
for better protection of sharks and marine wildlife. While some of
the issues that he takes up–think tax evasion and property rights
legislation in Britain–are largely irrelevant to Canadian readers,
Monbiot’s rendering highlights the philosophical, rather than specific,
injustice.

Part of Monbiot’s stylistic charm, if you can call it that, is his
refusal to tread lightly. In an essay unsubtly entitled, "How Britain
Denies Its Holocausts," Monbiot attacks the Briton’s superiority
attitude toward Turkey’s denial of the Armenian Holocaust. Swiftly,
Monbiot takes a tour through Britain’s colonial history to point out
the utter hypocrisy of such a stance. He points to a famine in India
in the years 1876 – 1878: millions died because the British insisted
that India’s rice and wheat exports continue unabated. Similarly,
in Kenya in the 1950s, after the Kikuyu started to organize against
the British, who had thrown them off their land, the British sent up
to 320 000 of them to concentration camps.

The caption on Monbiot’s website reads, "Tell people something they
know already and they will thank you for it. Tell them something new
and they will hate you for it." Let’s hope that Monbiot gains a few
more haters on this side of the pond with Bring on the Apocalypse. V

Bring on the Apocalypse: Essays on Self-Destruction By George Monbiot
Anchor Canada 242 PP, $22

http://www.vueweekly.com/article.php?id=8740

Russian, Armenian Deputy Fms Discussed Preparation For Serzh Sargsya

RUSSIAN, ARMENIAN DEPUTY FMS DISCUSSED PREPARATION FOR Serzh Sargsyan’s visit to Russia

PanARMENIAN.Net
11.06.20

On June 11, Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin met
with his Armenian counterpart Gegham Gharibjanian, the RF MFA press
office said.

The officials discussed preparation for Serzh Sargsyan’s visit to
Russia and development of the Armenian-Russian relations.

US Senate Foreign Relations Committee To Hold Hearings On Armenia

U.S. SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE TO HOLD HEARINGS ON ARMENIA

DeFacto Agency, Armenia
June 11 2008

The focus of two key Congressional committees will turn to the
Caucasus region next week as Senate Foreign Relations Committee
and House Foreign Affairs Committee members will, in an exercise of
their oversight responsibilities, have the opportunity to question
State Department officials on U.S. policy regarding Armenia and the
surrounding area, reported the Armenian National Committee of America
(ANCA).

"In the days leading up to these important hearings, I want to
encourage every Armenian American to pick up the phone and to share
their thoughts with their legislators who serve on these two panels –
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs
Committee," said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. "Simply call
the Capitol Switch at (202) 225-3121 and asked to be connected to your
Senator or Representative, leave your message, and then drop us a note
at [email protected] with any feedback that you think might be helpful."

The ANCA has also provided sample phone scripts and contact information
for Senators and Representatives at

Assistant Secretary of State for Europe Dan Fried will testify before
the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday June 18th at 10:00
a.m. EDT regarding U.S. policy toward the Caucasus region. Chairman
Howard Berman (D-CA) and his fellow Committee members will be focusing
on a wide range of issues including the ongoing blockade of Armenia,
U.S. policy on the Armenian Genocide, and foreign aid. To note,
the World Bank estimates that Turkey and Azerbaijan’s blockades of
Armenia reduce Armenia’s GDP by up to 38% annually.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), along with Rep. George Radanovich (R-CA)
and Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairs Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ)
and Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) recently introduced the "End the Turkish
Blockade of Armenia" Bill (H.R. 6079), which calls upon Turkey to
end its blockade of Armenia and asks the U.S. Department of State to
report on its efforts towards this end.

It should be added that on Thursday, June 19th, at 2:15pm, the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee is slated to hold a confirmation hearing
for U.S. Ambassador to Armenia nominee Marie Yovanovitch. On March
28, 2008, Pres. Bush nominated Amb. Marie L. Yovanovitch to serve as
America’s next Ambassador to Armenia. The ANCA has spoken to Committee
members about the value of carefully questioning Amb. Yovanovitch
on the many issues she will face as the U.S. envoy in Yerevan, among
them the recognition of the Armenian Genocide, Turkey and Azerbaijan’s
ongoing blockades of Armenia, and the need for a balanced U.S. role
in helping forge a democratic and peaceful resolution to the Nagorno
Karabagh conflict. These efforts have been supported by extensive
on-line outreach and a national postcard campaign to key Senate
Foreign Relations Committee members.

To remind, President Bush’s previous nominee as U.S. Ambassador to
Armenia, Richard Hoagland, was subject to two legislative holds
by Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) and was ultimately withdrawn by the
Administration, following the nominee’s statements denying the Armenian
Genocide. The last U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, John Marshall Evans,
was fired by President Bush for speaking honestly about the Armenian
Genocide. The ANCA led the Armenian American community campaign
opposing Hoagland’s nomination, stating that a genocide denier could
not serve as a credible and effective U.S. spokesperson in Armenia.

www.anca.org.

Artur Javadyan’s Candidacy For Position Of Armenian Central Bank Cha

ARTUR JAVADYAN’S CANDIDACY FOR POSITION OF ARMENIAN CENTRAL BANK CHAIRMAN
APPROVED

2008-06-11 15:04:00

ArmInfo. Armenia Parliament approved the candidacy of the First Vice
Chairman of the Armenian Central Bank Artur Javadyan for the position
of Central Bank Chairman by 92 votes and 2 votes . Another 3 ballots
were recognized invalid.

In his speech, A. Javadyan said the key task of the CB is still
restriction of the rise of prices. Inflation in Armenia may first of
all affect the socially unsecured citizens, hinder economic growth and
accumulation of savings. He underlined that inflation is manageable
so far in the country but there is threat of its growing. He said
that earlier inflation pressures from international markets were
influencing mostly the aggregate demand, whereas now in the background
of growing international tariffs of fuel, foodstuffs and raw-materials,
inflation pressures are felt also from the aggregate supply. A.Javadyan
emphasized the development of insurance, exchange and mortgage lending
markets, creation of mortgage funds and drafting of a conception for
creation of All-Armenian Development Bank.

President of Armenia nominates Chairman of the CB submits the nominee
to the parliament. CB Chairman elected for 6 years. The position
had been vacant since April 2008 when Chairman Tigran Sargsyan was
appointed Prime Minister of Armenia. Artur Javadyan was born on 22
April 1964. He graduated from Yerevan Agricultural University. He
underwent several training courses in abroad. A. Javadyan headed a
commercial bank. He was a member of CB Council, and first Vice Chairman
of CB. A. Javadyan is Director of the Black Sea Trade &Development
Bank for Armenia. Married, has a daughter.

Speaker Of Armenian Parliament Not To Tender His Resignation

SPEAKER OF ARMENIAN PARLIAMENT NOT TO TENDER HIS RESIGNATION

arminfo
2008-06-09 18:37:00

ArmInfo. Speaker of the Armenian parliament Tigran Torosyan disproved
the rumours that he had made an arrangement with ex-deputy of the
parliament Genrik Abrahamyan who has recently refused his deputy
mandate.

As he told journalists he makes no such arrangements. As for Genrik
Abrahamyan, he was appointed the director of the Artashat wine
factory. For this reason he tendered his resignation from the post
of the National Assembly deputy as business activity is incompatible
with the authorities of a deputy, Tigran Torosyan explained. When
commenting on the spread rumours that Torosyan is going to tender
his resignation from the post of the National Assembly speaker,
so that Genrik Abrahamyan’s brother Hovik Abrahamyan be elected to
the post of speaker, Torosyan replied: ‘I am not going to tender my
resignation as there is no ground for that. Moreover, I don’t have a
right to make such a step as it will bring down rating of the country’,
– Tigran Torosyan said.

BAKU: New Opportunities For Nagorno-Karabakh Negotiations

NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR NAGORNO-KARABAKH NEGOTIATIONS

Trend News Agency
June 9 2008
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, 9 June / Т corr S. Agayeva/ "After passing of the
UN Resolution on the Situation in the Occupied Territory of Azerbaijan,
new opportunities have been created for the negotiations on settlement
of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and these must be accepted by
OSCE Minsk Group’s co-chairs and other international organizations,"
Khazar Ibrahim, Spokesperson for Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry, said
to journalists on 9 June.

At the beginning of March, the UN General Assembly supported
the Resolution on the Situation in the Occupied Territory of
Azerbaijan. The Resolution was passed, with 39 countries voting for,
7 against (including OSCE Minsk Group’s co-chairing countries –
Russia, France and USA) and 100 abstained.

The resolution reflects a serious concern that the armed conflict in
the Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan still poses a serious threat
to the international community and security, as well as negatively
affects the humanitarian situation in the South Caucasus countries.

The resolution reflects the necessity for all Armenian armed forces to
immediately and unconditionally withdraw from the occupied Azerbaijani
territories.

According to Ibrahim, Madrid proposals also provide good prospects
to settle the conflict.

Spokesperson said that after the next visit of Minsk Group
intermediaries to the region, scheduled for the end of June, it would
be possible to say whether any progress was achieved in the conflict
settling as a result of the meeting between Azerbaijani and Armenian
Presidents in St Petersburg on 6 June.

The conflict between the two countries of the South Caucasus began
in 1988 due to Armenian territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Since
1992, Armenian Armed Forces have occupied 20% of Azerbaijan including
the Nagorno-Karabakh region and its seven surrounding districts. In
1994, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement at which
time the active hostilities ended. The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk
Group ( Russia, France, and the US) are currently holding peaceful
negotiations.

–Boundary_(ID_oYiBJRxzqHJ +J5v3EDqP8g)–

Armenian side about Sargsyan – Aliyev meeting

Panorama.am

17:56 06/06/2008

ARMENIAN SIDE ABOUT SARGSYAN-ALIEV MEETING

Today the president of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan had a
meeting with the president of Azerbaijan Ilhaam Aliev
in -Baltick Star- hotel in Saint Petersburg. This is
the first meeting of the president of Armenia with his
Azeri counter part. According to the press service of
the president’s administration before the presidents’
meeting the Foreign Minister of the both countries had
an hour long meeting.

According to the source the Foreign Affairs Ministers
of Armenia and Azerbaijan, co-chairmen of the OSCE
Minsk group Yuri Merzliakov, Bernard Fassier and
Mattew Bryza, and the Personal Representative of the
Chairman-in-Office on the Conflict Dealt with by the
OSCE Minsk group Andrzej Kasprzyk were also present at
the meeting. After, the presidents had tête-à-tête
meeting and after an hour the officials joined the
presidents.

Armenian side evaluates the results of the meeting of
the presidents as structural. The presidents talked
about their view points in the negotiating process,
and recommended the Foreign Affairs Ministers to
continue the negotiations with the support of the OSCE
Minsk group co-chairmen. The officials made some
arrangements that the co-chairmen should visit the
region in the end of June.

Source: Panorama.am

Toronto District School Board Reaffirms The Teaching Of The Armenian

TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD REAFFIRMS THE TEACHING OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

armradio.am
04.06.2008 14:58

After an intolerable Turkish campaign aiming at making remove the
Armenian genocide of the school program of Toronto District School
Board, this last unanimously approved, on June 2, the recommendation
of its Review Committee (RC) and its Director to include the Armenian
Genocide in its Grade 11 genocide curriculum, independent correspondent
Jean Eckian informed.

Turkish groups have, in the past six months, lobbied against the
inclusion of the Armenian Genocide in the Grade 11 curriculum. The
PSSC recommendation now goes to the board’s June 25th meeting for
final adoption.

The Council of Turkish Canadians (CTC) objected to the inclusion
of the Armenian Genocide in the curriculum and called for its
removal. Furthermore, CTC threatened to take legal measures to halt
the introduction of the curriculum if the board did not consent to
the CTC demand.

A representative of the Muslim Canadian Congress, Farzana Hassan,
turned the curriculum teaching issue to a religious crusade. She
accused the board and the Western world of religious bias. She made
similar accusations against Canadian media, specially the Globe and
Mail and the Toronto Star newspapers.

Based on June 2 meeting and the approval of the recommendations, the
Armenian Genocide will be part of the Grade 11 genocide curriculum
and it will be taught as one of the three case studies along with
the Holocaust and the Rwandan Genocide and as a separate unit.

In regard to Barbara Coloroso’s book, Extraordinary Evil: A Brief
History of Genocide, even though it will not be required reading;
it will be included in the curriculum as resource material.

ANCC President, Dr. Girair Basmadjian, commended the TDSB for upholding
its moral and ethical principles and for not wavering in the face of
unprecedented revisionist campaign to falsify and rewrite the history
of the Armenian Genocide. "By approving the recommendations, TDSB
proved that the Turkish government interference and manipulation
of academic institutions and its attempt to suppress freedom of
expression is a failed policy. We are confident the curriculum will
create better understanding between Turkish and Armenian students and
will help them rationalize their common history," stated Dr. Basmadjian

Aris Babikian, executive director of ANCC, criticized the Turkish
representatives who tried to use an educational forum to promote
unsubstantiated accusation against the Armenian community by
insinuating that Armenians are teaching hatred against Turks in their
churches, schools and community centres. "Once again, we would like to
emphasize that we do not have any conflict with the Canadian-Turkish
community. At issue is the Turkish government’s denial policy, a
policy which Turkish ultranationalists are using to whip hysteria
and animosity between the two people. A policy which simply does not
fit with the school boards view of history, nor that of Canadians
generally," said Babikian.

Father Lombardi On Religious, Cultural Dialogue

FATHER LOMBARDI ON RELIGIOUS, CULTURAL DIALOGUE

Zenit News Agency
June 2 2008
Italy

"The Media Institutions of the Holy See Play an Important Role"

TORONTO, JUNE 2, 2008 (Zenit.org).- Here is the address Jesuit Father
Federico Lombardi, director of the Vatican press office, Vatican Radio
and Vatican Television Center, gave Friday at the Toronto Catholic
Business Leaders’ Breakfast.

* * *

Your Grace, Archbishop Collins, Reverend Fathers, Dear Friends,

I am delighted to be here in Toronto and have this opportunity to
meet you for this Mass and breakfast for Catholic Business Leaders of
the Archdiocese of Toronto. I applaud the efforts of your archbishop
and his collaborators, Fathers [Joseph] Schner and [Thomas] Rosica,
for organizing these important gatherings. It is an honor to be one
of your guest speakers!

Six years ago I had the privilege and pleasure of being in this very
city for World Youth Day 2002. I cherish the memories of those blessed
days, lived with Pope John Paul II, tens of thousands of young people,
and so many of you who donated your time, talent and treasure to that
wonderful event.

As you know I wear several hats in the Church and in the Society
of Jesus! In my role as director of the Holy See Press Office, I
work closely with the Holy Father and the Curia. I also oversee two
important organs of communications of the Holy See: Vatican Television
and Vatican Radio.

Today I would like to share with you some personal reflections on
my work in the area of communications at the Vatican. In reflecting
aloud with you today, I hope to encourage you in your own important
work at the service of the Church and the truth.

Ecumenical relationships with other Christians

One of the great undertakings recent Popes have pursued with regards
to unity and dialogue in today’s world is that of ecumenism and
relationships with other religions and cultures.

I wish to comment on these undertakings, put into effect by the current
pontiff. Since his first speech in the Sistine Chapel on the morning
following his election, Benedict XVI clearly stated that ecumenism —
the search for unity with other Christian denominations — is one of
the greatest priorities of his pontificate, one that he will carry
on in the footsteps of his predecessor.

The apostolic voyage to Istanbul, which included the visit with the
patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew, has thus far been the most
evident sign of this ecumenical pursuit. As head of communications I
wish to remind you that in these […] occasions we have experienced
exceptional collaboration with the communications department of the
Orthodox patriarchy, whose various members came from America.

For example, all the celebrations including the encounter between
the Pope and the patriarch were internationally broadcast from the
Centro Televisivo Vaticano with live commentary in six different
languages. The live commentary was a result of the joint effort between
the editors of Radio Vaticana, several priests and a team of Orthodox
experts who came to Rome from various parts of the world for the
very purpose of this occasion. The Orthodox communities in America
and other parts of the world, including Australia, have been able
to follow the events via various Catholic television networks such
as EWTN in America, and Salt and Light Television in Canada, among
others. I ask that you forgive me for this specific mention, but it
seems to me a perfect example of how we can put social communications
to the service of ecumenism.

For years, CTV and Radio Vaticana have established intense and
continuous collaboration with the Pontifical Council for Promoting
Christian Unity. Numerous are the broadcasts of the visits to Rome
by patriarchs and important delegations of Greece, Rumania, Bulgaria,
etc, and have been offered free of charge to their respective national
networks.

Substantial ecumenism is achieved by the Pope and his collaborators,
while we, on the other hand, contribute to making it seen, felt and
heard. Among other examples of the ecumenical progress of our times,
I would like to recall the visits to Rome by the archbishop of all
of Greece, Christodoulos — now deceased — and of the archbishop
of Cyprus. These visits have been very significant, because it was
a first for these Orthodox Churches. Other visits, such as the most
recent one on behalf of Catholicos of Armenia, Karekin II, confirm the
good relationships already established by the preceding pontificate.

An ecumenical relationship with the Eastern Church that remains
problematic to this day is the one with the patriarch of Russia. In
spite of the difficulties, there are, however, many blossoming
relationships from which we can cultivate the hope that one day soon
we will arrive to an encounter of the highest level, even if for the
time being any forecast of this kind is clearly premature. In this
regard, social communications can also carry out its service.

A small sign of progress on the Russian front, in which I personally
have been involved, is the recent airing of an hour length documentary
on Pope Benedict XVI on a national Television channel. This documentary
was a co-production between orthodox and Catholics, and contained
a Russian message pronounced by the Pope himself for the Russian
people. It was recorded at an earlier time in our studios for this very
purpose. Naturally, a production of this kind was an "absolute first,"
and it could not have happened without the consent of the Orthodox
patriarch of Moscow. Therefore it is considered a very positive sign.

The relationships with the Christian denominations originating from
the Reform are meaningful events and encounters, even if the distance
from a doctrinal and ecclesial point of view is greater than that
with the non-Catholic Oriental Churches. Having remained in close
contact with the developments and problems of modern Western culture,
these denominations have experienced more than anyone the challenges
and influences of relativism and individualism, which Pope Benedict
characterized as serious risks that bring about negative consequences
for ecumenism as well.

It’s sufficient to think of the various attitudes with regards to
moral problems. Benedict XVI is not afraid to assert that ecumenical
engagement must be verified on the basis of the essential contents
of the Christian faith, which — like "ancient symbols" or "formulas
of faith" — constitute the foundations of Christian unity. In this
sense, a very important and very "Ratzingerian" speech during the
apostolic trip to America, perhaps barely noticed, was exactly that
in the ecumenical encounter.

The Pope said: "Even within the ecumenical movement, Christians may
be reluctant to assert the role of doctrine for fear that it would
only exacerbate rather than heal the wounds of division. Yet a clear,
convincing testimony to the salvation wrought for us in Christ Jesus
has to be based upon the notion of normative apostolic teaching: a
teaching which indeed underlies the inspired word of God and sustains
the sacramental life of Christians today."

Otherwise, everyone will think him or herself more and more capable
of following their own conscience and choose for themselves the
community that best satisfies their personal preferences. But this
is the opposite path way to unity: It is the path of fragmentation
and unending dispersion.

The relationships with other religions

Regarding the relationships with other religions, many have questioned
if, after the great progress of the pontificate of John Paul II
(ie. the encounter in Assisi of the world’s religious leaders), the
new pontificate is taking a different direction, one that is perhaps
less open to dialogue. I think not, but surely Benedict XVI wishes
for a sincere dialogue, one that does not hide the true problems.

Concerning the relationship with Judaism, Benedict XVI has from the
beginning taken meaningful action, not only in receiving illustrious
visitors, but above all, in his visit to the Synagogue of Cologne,
to the extermination camp of Auschwitz, to the memorial of the Jewish
victims of Nazism in Vienna, and most recently, to one of the great
synagogues of New York.

In light of these important public actions, the disputes on the
formulation of a specific prayer in a particular form of celebration of
the Holy Friday liturgy, now hardly used by anyone, appear marginal,
even if they unveil an ongoing sensitivity among many of our Hebrew
brothers and sisters, which requires that we always remain aware,
attentive and respectful.

I like to recall that in his 24-year pontificate, John Paul II visited
one synagogue, the synagogue of Rome, while Benedict XVI in three
years has already visited two: Therefore, he is indeed making progress
on the road paved by his predecessor. This is also true for mosques:
John Paul II visited one after 20 years of pontificate; Benedict has
already visited one after a year and a half.

It goes without saying that the relationship with Islam underwent a
more difficult route via the Regensburg address and the discussions
that followed. Without revisiting the debate over the famous quote
of the Byzantine emperor, it is obvious that the Pope’s intention
was to clearly express his idea that every authentic religious view
must refute violence and use reason when thinking of God and our
relationship with him; only in this way can reason preserve itself
respectful both to God and to the dignity of the human person. This
speech generated various Muslim responses to the Pope’s position as
well as an intense reflection within the Muslim world.

The monarch of Saudi Arabia came to Rome to visit the Pope and
to express his desire for unity in the path to peace between the
great world religions; including the Christians and the Jews. This
reflection is to be considered a positive and promising one considering
the remaining difficulties of this dialogue, a dialogue that must
confront the true problems, such as those concerning the respect of
rights and the person both in Christianity and in Islam.

Over 100 wise Muslims of various views have established common
positions, with which to confront Christians and Jews in light of
the common responsibility to bring peace to humanity. Surely, this
is a promising novelty.

>From my perspective, which is that of the media, I have seen how
on the occasion of the monarch’s visit to Rome, an official Saudi
Arabian Television station interviewed me for a long time in order to
better educate the public of Arabia on the Vatican. That same official
television station has recently returned to interview me again in order
to further explore the themes of dialogue and collaboration of all
religions in formulating the path to peace. These are promising signs.

At the same time, the Pope knows how to be coherent and firm on his
positions. For example, on the Easter Vigil in St. Peter’s, he himself
administered the sacrament of baptism to a famous Egyptian journalist,
Magdi Allam, of Muslim origin. That was truly a brave act, one that
affirmed the right to religious freedom and conversion to Christianity.

Even if I had to explain that this baptism does not signify that
the Pope shares all of Magdi Allam’s ideas, even those regarding
the relationship with Islam — some of which are controversial — it
cannot be denied that this was an important public act in supporting
the right to religious freedom. This makes it clear that the Pope
desires dialogue with Islam to move forward, but not to the extent
of sacrificing essential principles in the process.

Dialogue with the people of the world

Finally, I would like to recall another important aspect of the
dialogue, one which the Church — and the whole world — is closely
following: the one with China. The Holy Father has shown through his
"Letter to Chinese Catholics" how much his thought and prayers were
directed to China in the previous year.

In the document, he explicitly manifested the desire of a normalization
of the relationships with Chinese authorities in order to guarantee
the Church in China a serene life of freedom and extend to her the
friendship of the universal Catholic Church and its dedication to
peace and the integral good of the human family. Just last Saturday,
on May 24, the world celebrated the day of prayer for the Church in
China established by the Pope in his letter.

It is not my job, nor is it my duty to speak here of the goings-on
between the authorities of the Holy See and the representatives of the
Chinese government. But I can speak of a recent episode that involved
social communications and has become a positive and encouraging sign
of hope. It concerns a grand concert that recently occurred in the
Paul VI Hall in the Vatican on behalf of the Philharmonic Orchestra
of Beijing and the Opera of Shanghai.

Present were the Pope, many authorities of the Roman Curia and various
Chinese personalities, in particular Mrs. Deng Rong, daughter of the
famous leader Deng Xiao Ping, and representatives of the government
of Beijing such as the ambassador of China in Italy.

It cannot be ignored that this event, beyond its cultural significance,
represented an important sign of good relationship and friendship. The
Chinese Orchestra chose to perform an important piece, both Western
and religious; the Requiem of Mozart and also a short, beautiful and
popular Chinese song: Jasmin Flowers.

Up until a few years ago it would have been unthinkable that a
Chinese orchestra would perform a Western and religious piece in an
international venue. The Pope attended the concert and gave a short
but meaningful speech on art as a vessel of dialogue between peoples
and cultures, recalling with affection all Chinese Catholics.

The entire concert was broadcast live from the Centro Televisivo
Vaticano, Vatican Radio and repeated on Phoenix TV, the most
watched independent Chinese television station both locally and
abroad. Following government directions — the station also reserved
a three-hour time slot for Vatican specials.

We at the Vatican have enjoyed exceptional collaboration with the
Chinese organization; everyone appeared enthusiastic about this
initiative and very much aware of its historical significance. Since
I was able to send a Chinese translation of the Holy Father’s speech
ahead of time, the Pope was able, for the first time, to speak directly
to a huge number of Chinese.

Unfortunately, the great tragedy of the earthquake in Sichuan occurred
in the following days. The Pope publicly manifested his sympathy and
sorrow, and the Chinese ambassador to Rome shared with me that the
Pope’s words had a wide impact throughout the nation. The Pope is
no longer a stranger to the Chinese people, but a great personality
surrounded by attention and respect.

Furthermore, gradual steps in the normalization of the relationship
between the Holy See and Vietnam are currently taking place and being
followed by China with great interest. Anticipation surrounding the
events of the Olympic Games encourages the opening of China to the
rest of the world. Being aware of the fact that such openings have
often been followed by regress and disappointment, it cannot be denied
that this moment in time marks a concrete sign of hope.

Conclusion

In the vast and diverse range of relationships of the Holy See
and the universal Church with other Christian denominations, other
religious faiths, nations and cultures, social dialogue carries an
important role. It is with deep emotion that today I can speak of
having played a role in the first two appearances of Pope Benedict
XVI on both Russian and Chinese television networks.

In all these things, the media institutions of the Holy See play
an important role, but collaboration within the universal Church
is essential in the spread of information and ideas. No one in the
Church community exists and operates alone.

Your friendship and your encouragement are essential to the
effectiveness of our service.

Thank you and may God bless you all!

Federico Lombardi, S.J.