ANKARA: Armenia Gives Assurances On Border Recognition

ARMENIA GIVES ASSURANCES ON BORDER RECOGNITION

Today’s Zaman
April 15 2009
Turkey

Armenia has given assurances that it will make no territorial
claim on Turkey, as officials of the two countries inch closer to
an agreement that would pave the way for normalization of relations
after a 16-year hiatus. Sources in Yerevan who are close to the talks
also say the final deal is likely to be declared in a third country,
most probably Switzerland, which has reportedly hosted closed-door
negotiations since 2007.

The Turkish-Armenian talks have been held in strict secrecy and
officials are tightlipped on what a possible deal would include. But
as expectations grow higher for a breakthrough soon, details are
beginning to emerge, such as the Armenian guarantee on recognition
of the current Armenian-Turkish border. Ankara, which closed the
border and severed its diplomatic ties with Armenia in 1993, links
normalization to a set of conditions that include formal guarantees
from Armenia recognizing the current border with Turkey. Yerevan
has never formally claimed any rights on Turkish territory but the
Armenian constitution describes eastern Anatolia as western Armenia.

Asked whether Armenia recognizes a 1920 treaty on the border with
Turkey, an Armenian source said: "We are talking about the opening
of the border. Which border is to be opened? Can a border be opened
if it is not recognized?"

The final Turkish-Armenian deal is now expected to include provisions
that the two countries respect each other’s territorial integrity
and borders.

The agreement is also expected to unveil plans to establish low-level
diplomatic relations and create an intergovernmental committee to
study history. Armenia claims 1.5 million Armenians were killed
in a systematic genocide campaign at the hands of the late Ottoman
Empire during the World War I, while Turkey categorically rejects the
accusations of genocide. However, it is expected to take years for the
committee to be established and announce findings on its study. Even
so, although no progress is seen to be forthcoming, Armenia’s nod
to the establishment of such a committee of historians underlines
that the dispute over the World War I events is a matter of history,
not a legal or a political one.

On another problematic issue, the ongoing Armenian occupation of
Azerbaijani territory in the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, the agreement
is expected to make a general reference to the problem. But there
will be no deadline mentioned for a resolution.

The government has been holding closed-door talks with Armenia since
2007 on the normalization of ties, signaling a shift in Turkey’s
longstanding policy, which links restoration of relations to Armenian
withdrawal from Azerbaijani territory and a reversal in the Armenian
policy of lobbying for international recognition of Armenian genocide
claims at the hands of the late Ottoman Empire. Armenian recognition
of the current border is another condition.

Azerbaijan, which fears it would lose a key leverage in its
Nagorno-Karabakh dispute with Armenia if Ankara agrees to have
normal ties with Yerevan anyway, has expressed concern over the
Turkish-Armenian rapprochement and Azerbaijani leader Ilham Aliyev
boycotted a the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC)
meeting held in İstanbul on April 6-7.

The issue has sparked heated debates in Parliament as well. Opposition
parties yesterday lashed out at the government for its plans to
normalize relations with Armenia without Yerevan ending its occupation
of Azerbaijani territory.

"How can we ignore the ongoing occupation of Azerbaijan?" Deniz Baykal,
leader of the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), told
a weekly meeting of his party in Parliament. "How can Turkey follow
a policy that would legitimize seizure of Azerbaijan’s legitimate
territorial rights?"

The closed border with Armenia is a source of irritation in Ankara’s
relations with the European Union, which it aspires to join, and
the United States. It also hampers the government’s plans to expand
influence in the southern Caucasus.

"No one can open the border with Armenia unless claims based on
the genocide lies are withdrawn and Nagorno-Karabakh is returned to
Azerbaijan," said Devlet Bahceli, head of the Nationalist Movement
Party (MHP) and a vehement opponent of normalization in Armenia ties.

"I am warning the government: Your approach to Armenia harms our
dignity," Bahceli said, maintaining that he completely shared the
Azerbaijani people’s "rightful concerns." A group of three deputies
from Bahceli’s MHP departed for Baku yesterday for talks with Azeri
officials.

Dismissing calls from the opposition to share with the public details
about the ongoing talks, President Abdullah Gul said Turkey wants
a normalization that would help stability and peace in the whole of
the Caucasus and added that it would not be in line with diplomatic
tendencies to disclose details of the talks.

Turkish journalists briefly detained

Meanwhile, five Turkish journalists, including this reporter, were
briefly detained on Monday by Armenian forces after they attempted
to film the Turkish-Armenian border without permission from Armenian
authorities.

The journalists were taken to a police station on the border,
where they were offered tea, coffee and cookies. The journalists
were released after two hours, reporting cordial treatment by the
Armenian forces.

RA MFA Refused To Discuss Armenian-Turkish Relations With Miatsum Po

RA MFA REFUSED TO DISCUSS ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS WITH MIATSUM POLITICAL MOVEMENT

PanArmenian
April 15 2009
Armenia

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian Volunteers’ Union organized a discussion
on normalization of Armenian-Turkish ties. Volunteer soldiers of
Artsakh war, intelligentsia and public organizations representatives
participated in the discussion.

One of the participants, writer and publicist Gevorg Yazychyan noted,
"What we witness now is not Armenian-Turkish relations, but only
Armenian-Turkish opposition and hostility."

"We lost part of our motherland and it’s our duty to set it free,"
he stated.

According to film director Tigran Khzmalyan, some day Armenian-Turkish
border will open, yet Armenian people are not ready for it today. "We
don’t want to live a life of seclusion and limited possibilities. We
have to work towards our society’s accepting the challenge," he noted.

When questioned by PanARMENIAN.Net reporter as to their steps
undertaken in that direction, Tigran Khzmalyan stressed that Miatsum
Political Movement repeatedly addressed the RA Foreign Minister to
request a meeting, yet received a refusal. "Important issues of
national identity and security should be discussed at the round
table with representatives of society, intelligentsia and public
organizations," he said.

Parties agreed to continue discussions in future to determine the
line of their further actions.

Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister To Visit Armenia

AZERBAIJANI DEPUTY FOREIGN MINISTER TO VISIT ARMENIA

ANS
14.04.2009 17:06

The aim of the visit is to attend the meeting of the Foreign Ministers
Council of the Black Sea Economic Co-operation Organization.

The Deputy Foreign Minister Mahmud Mammadquliyev will pay a visit to
the Armenian capital city of Yerevan on April 16. The Press Secretary
of the Foreign Ministry Elkhan Poulukhov informed ANS that the aim of
the visit was to attend the meeting of the Foreign Ministers Council of
the Black Sea Co-operation Organisation. Azerbaijan will take over the
chairmanship in the organization. "Therefore, it is necessary that the
Deputy Foreign Minister to take part at the meeting," Poulukhov noted.

BSEC Foreign Ministers will discuss increasing the efficiency
of the organization’s activity by deepening regional cooperation,
implementing joint regional projects in the spheres of transport and
energy, exchanging views to reduce the impact of the global financial
and economic crisis on the member states. Poulukhov further added
that Mammadguliyev was not expected t hold any meetings during the
one-day visit.

Regular Meeting Of CSTO Foreign Ministerial Council To Be Held In Ye

REGULAR MEETING OF CSTO FOREIGN MINISTERIAL COUNCIL TO BE HELD IN YEREVAN APRIL 16-17

ArmInfo
2009-04-14 12:36:00

ArmInfo. Regular meeting of CSTO Foreign Ministerial Council will be
held in Yerevan on April 16-17.

As official representative of Russia’s Foreign Ministry
A. Nesterenko said, it is scheduled to discuss the information of
CSTO Secretary General about the foreign political cooperation of
CSTO member-states on the topical problems of international security
and the main directions of their interaction with international
regional organizations with focus on improvement of the mechanism of
coordination of the approaches to the global problems. The meeting
agenda includes approval of the Memorandum of Cooperation among
CSTO and UN secretariats for establishment of practical interaction
between the two organizations. It is also scheduled to listen
to the information of the Secretary General about the results of
consideration of the prospects of military cooperation till 2020
and enhancement of the efficiency of multilateral cooperation in
counteraction to the new challenges and threats at the sessions of
the Defense Ministerial Council in November, 2008 and the Committee
of Secretaries of Security Councils in December, 2008. An important
place in the agenda has been given to the issue about the intermediate
results of work on fulfillment of the decision of CSTO CSC February 4,
2009 extra session on creation of CSTO Collective Rapid Deployment
Force (CRDF). Directions of CSTO member-states’ joint activity on
assistance to stabilization of the situation in Afghanistan and
counteraction to the drug-threat, originating from Iran, will be
discussed as well. The participants in the meeting will agree the
time and place of the next FMC meeting.

Turkey’s Culture Minister Wants To Cooperate With Armenia

TURKEY’S CULTURE MINISTER WANTS TO COOPERATE WITH ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
14.04.2009 00:34 GMT+04:00

Turkey and Armenia should cooperate to restore the ancient town of Ani,
said Culture Minister Ertugrul Gunay, adding that any such effort would
require a resolution of the problems between Azerbaijan and Armenia,
Hurriyet Daily News reports.

The ministry’s plans for cooperation between the two countries are
not limited to restoration work. He said he hoped to undertake many
joint cultural projects with both Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The ancient town of Ani was the capital of the Kingdom of Armenia
between 961 and 1045. Its ruins are situated in the Arpacay region of
the northeastern province of Kars, on the Turkish side of the border
between the two countries.

Gunay said world-renowned Turkish piano virtuoso Idil Biret would
hold a concert in Armenia in the next few months as part of her
Caucasus tour. "We have certain sensitivities, but we also are aware
that cultural activities can play a key role in resolving political
issues," he said. "This is a first step."

The Turkish government’s practice of calling the town "Ani," rather
than Ani, in order to give it a more Turkish character has also been
a source of controversy. When asked about the matter, Gunay implied
that it would soon be resolved. "I find changing the original names
of historical sites meaningless," he said. "Such names harm no one."

The culture minister said the current restoration efforts in Ani
would soon turn their focus to the town’s cathedral and that Armenian
experts had recently attended a meeting on the project. The World
Monuments Fund would support the restoration of the cathedral, he said.

Gunay added that the ministry was also ready to contribute to the
Turkish-Armenian community in Istanbul’s efforts to find the funds
to restore the 500-year-old Surp Giragos Church in the southeastern
province of Diyarbakir.

But the community fears any application for help would result in the
church being restored as a museum rather than a place of worship that
would serve the community, as happened with the Surp Church on the
island of Akdamar in the eastern province of Van.

Gunay said if the community filed a request, his ministry would be
glad to be of assistance, adding, "We have the utmost respect for
all beliefs."

Conference on Armenian-Turkish Relation Launched in Turkey

CONFERENCE ON ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATION LAUNCHED IN TURKEY

14:19 11/04/2009
Source: Panorama.am

`Armenian-Turkish relations and current situation’ conference is
launched in Turkey. The Mission of the conference is to discuss
Armenian-Turkish relations and to try to ease the tension between
Armenia and Azerbaijan regarding the opening of Armenian-Turkish
border. To attend the conference Azerbaijani delegation arrived in
Turkey.

Armenian President to visit Iran on Monday

ISNA, Iranian Students News Agency
April 12 2009

Armenian President to visit Iran on Monday

TEHRAN, Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian will pay an official visit
to Iran 13 and 14 April.

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian, Energy Minister Armen
Movsesian and Economy Minister Nerses Yeritsyan are in his delegation
in Iran.

Sarkisian is planned to meet Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani and Secretary of Supreme National
Security Council Saeed Jalili.

Officials of the two countries will hold talks on several documents
which are to be signed during the visit including the final agreement
on Iran-Armenia direct railway.

Also Armenia’s Energy Minister Armen Movsesian who is already in
Tehran and Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki have hold talks and
reviewed latest bilateral documents.

IMF Will Assist Armenia Much Possible

IMF WILL ASSIST ARMENIA MUCH POSSIBLE

19:18:39 – 10/04/2009
LRAGIR.AM

Today, the prime minister of Armenia Tigran Sargsyan met with the
newly appointed Middle East and Central Asia regional head of the
International Monetary Fund Masud Ahmed. The IMF representative to
Armenia Ninke Omes was present at the meeting as well. The IMF
regional head underscored that the fund is ready to assist much
possible Armenia in this state. The IMF regional head evaluated as
positive the steps taken in Armenia in connection with the return to
the smart exchange rate policy. Masmud Ahmed noted that the IMF is
likely to discuss the question on allocating additional financial
assistance to Armenia; the press office of the Armenian government
reports.

BEIRUT: Syria Will Win Lebanon’s Elections

SYRIA WILL WIN LEBANON’S ELECTIONS
By Michael Young

Daily Star
April 9 2009
Lebanon

Two months away from Lebanon’s elections, we can begin to discern
clarity amid the vapors of boiling ambition. Over 700 candidates are
registered to contest 128 parliamentary seats, but the real story
lies elsewhere. Whether it is the March 14 coalition and its allies
that wins, or the March 8 coalition with the Aounists, the forthcoming
Parliament will be much friendlier to Syria than the current one is,
representing a marked return of Damascus’ hegemony over Lebanon.

There are several reasons for this, both regional and
local. Regionally, the Saudi-Syrian rapprochement has fundamentally
altered the nature of the political confrontation in Lebanon. Following
the summer war of 2006, the Saudis sought to isolate Syria (and with
it Iran) in Lebanon and the Arab world. However, that effort largely
failed. The Saudis, instead, found themselves isolated as they and
the Egyptians proved unable to derail the Arab League summit in
Damascus in March 2008, before later seeing another rival, Qatar,
host Lebanese reconciliation talks in May, after Hizbullah’s military
onslaught against western Beirut. The Gaza conflict, which confirmed
the extent to which Damascus and Tehran were able to play a spoiler
role on the Palestinian front, persuaded the Saudis to engage President
Bashar Assad in order to break Syria off from Iran, even if there is
great skepticism in Riyadh as to whether that will work.

Skepticism or not, the Saudis are fulfilling their end of the bargain,
particularly in Lebanon. In practical terms this appears to be leading,
for example, to an alliance in Tripoli between Saad Hariri, Najib
Mikati, and, if it goes through, Mohammad Safadi. The Saudis want
to unify Sunni ranks, but in a way where the Syrians will be able
to have their say with the Lebanese. That’s why, whoever wins the
elections, the next prime minister is likely to be Mikati, whom the
Syrians trust but who won’t stray away from the Saudis or from the
Lebanese Sunni consensus.

The first to understand the implications of this shift was Walid
Jumblatt. The Druze leader has irritated many in March 14 by moving
closer to the parliament speaker, Nabih Berri, while persistently
criticizing his own allies. However, Jumblatt knows that Berri is
returning as speaker, so he sees benefits in maintaining a good
relationship with him, as he does in using this to calm Druze-Shiite
tensions. But a longer-term explanation for Jumblatt’s behavior is that
he now needs a conduit to Damascus, and Berri provides one. Kamal
Jumblatt paid with his life for the Syrian-Saudi agreement over
Lebanon in 1976, which left him cut off politically and vulnerable
to assassination. Walid doesn’t want to repeat that.

Whether Jumblatt will once again visit Damascus is an open
question. But it seems highly improbable that he will adopt as hostile
a position against Syria as he did in the past four years. With Saad
Hariri bringing Mikati on board and perhaps having to accept him
as the next prime minister; with Jumblatt realigning on Syria and
strengthening his ties to Berri, who with his bloc will represent
a substantial Syrian stake in the system, alongside Hizbullah,
the Assad regime will find that a substantial share of Muslim
parliamentarians either support close ties with Syria or are in no
position to effectively oppose them.

What of the Christians? Michel Aoun may lose seats, but he is not
likely to lose very many to Syria’s adversaries. The Lebanese Forces
and the Phalange are optimistic about their chances, and have been
rapacious in their demands. However, in several constituencies their
candidates are dependent on volatile electoral alliances. In the Chouf,
the Metn, and perhaps even Beirut 1 if their Armenian Orthodox nominee
stays in the race, the Lebanese Forces candidates are at the mercy of
larger power blocs with whom they are not particularly close. The same
holds for the Phalange in Tripoli, Aley, and Zahleh, while even in the
Metn the party’s expected candidates, Sami Gemayel and Elie Karami,
are not guaranteed a victory if there is under-the-table collusion
against one or both of them.

As for the Metn, if Aoun recedes, the likelihood is that it is Michel
Murr who will gain. As a supporter of President Michel Sleiman,
and given his past, he has no quarrel with Syria. As for Kisirwan
and Jbeil, Aoun’s losses, if any, will mainly add to Sleiman’s
quota. And in the event Aoun retains his seats in both districts,
that will suit Syria just fine. That’s why, for example, Aoun’s
dispute with Berri over the Christian seats in Jezzine and Zahrani
may continue without a resolution. Whether it is Aoun or Berri who
wins, the Syrians will come out ahead in the end, even if they lean
toward Berri. As for Hizbullah, does it really want to see Aoun and
the Christians reaffirming themselves politically in Jezzine, behind
the new defense line the party is building against Israel?

Bashar Assad has promised that the June election will be Syria’s ticket
back into Lebanon, and he appears to be on the road to fulfilling
that promise. The Saudis have made their peace with him, as have the
Egyptians, and the Americans are too preoccupied with Afghanistan
and Iraq to concern themselves with

halting Syrian advances in Lebanon. As long as the southern border
remains quiet, there is little to trouble the international community.

With respect to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, prosecutor Daniel
Bellemare will almost certainly not issue an accusation before
2010, because his predecessor wasted two years by not moving his
investigation substantially forward. That’s plenty of time for
Assad to make himself relevant again internationally and to ensure,
from Beirut, that Lebanese judges on the tribunal will think twice
before pointing the finger at Syria. For all intents and purposes,
the momentum of the Hariri legal case has been lost, and given renewed
Saudi friendliness toward Syria, we shouldn’t expect the Hariri family
to complain about this.

The March 8-March 14 dichotomy no longer seems appropriate today,
despite the furious debate in Lebanon over who will win next
June. Whoever wins, Syria will emerge on top, its crimes forgotten
and its interests protected. That may sound benign when expressed
this way, but those interests will certainly expand in the future, to
Lebanon’s detriment. So much for Lebanon’s so-called Cedar Revolution,
never a revolution in the first place, and now as exposed as any old
tree to being cut down.

Sevak Aramazd’s Book Presentation Launched In Yerevan

SEVAK ARAMAZD’S BOOK PRESENTATION LAUNCHED IN YEREVAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.04.2009 18:28 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Sevak Aramazd’s book presentation launched in Aram
Khatchaturyan Museum, Yerevan.

"Armen" is the first book written by the author in prose.

"Armen" portrays the fate of every Armenian, embodied by the main
character, Armen.

"Every Armenian can see his fate in Armen, as every Armenian is a
victim of destiny. Its often difficult for him to reunite with its
true identity," the writer says.

Sevak Aramazd has authored 7 poetry collections, as well as
Armenian translation of the works buy a number of German writers and
philosophers: Gete, Rilke, Bell, Gesse.