Turkey’s Islamists Deny Armenian Genocide (Cont)

TURKEY’S ISLAMISTS DENY ARMENIAN GENOCIDE (CONT)
By Adrian Morgan

Spero News
=11606
Oct 21 2007

As one of the Sultan’s three cabinet members, the loss of Pasha
weakened the autocracy of Abdul-Hamid. Pasha had manipulated the
Sultan with fake bomb plots which were blamed on Armenians.

Sultan Abdul-Hamid II ruled in an autocratic fashion, fearful of
the break-up of his empire. He employed a secret police force, and
rebellious Kurds had been drafted as irregulars into the Hamidian
Cavalry. These had been involved in the massacres of Armenians in
the 1890s.

While Abdul-Hamid isolated himself with astrologers and favorites
in his palace, the Yildiz Koshku, a nationalist movement started
to grow amongst the intelligentsia and the military. Influenced by
Western political ideals, these individuals have become known by the
name they used in a revolution waged against Abdul-Hamid in 1908 –
the Young Turks.

These individuals had emerged in the 1890s, but had operated in
secret, out of fear of the spies of the palace secret police. Many
of the Young Turks had joined the nationalist group the Committee of
Union and Progress (Ittihad ve Terakki Jemiyeti or CUP). This had
been formed in 1889 at the Royal Medical Academy at Constantinople
by Abdullah Cevdet and four others. In February 1907, the Sultan’s
hated chief of secret police, Fehmi Pasha (Fehim Pasha) had been
forced into exile at the request of Germany, after he had illegally
impounded a Hamburg-bound ship.

As one of the Sultan’s three cabinet members, the loss of Pasha
weakened the autocracy of Abdul-Hamid. Pasha had manipulated the Sultan
with fake bomb plots which were blamed on Armenians. Even after his
exile, he was suspected of engineering a fatal bomb attack against
a former Armenian ally, Andon Keutchoglu.

In July 1908, the Young Turks staged a revolution against Abdul-Hamid
II. Two prominent CUP members led the uprisings amongst the military
– Niazi Bey led a revolt at Resna in Macedonia, closely followed
by Enver Bey in Salonica, Greece. They issued a proclamation that
demanded Abdul-Hamid restore the constitution he had rejected in
1878. The Sultan agreed, and in December the Turkish parliament met.

At some time after the July 1908 revolution, Fehmi Pasha had been
torn pieces by a mob in Bursa, northwestern Turkey.

The Sultan (who was also Caliph) did not approve of a parliament
making decisions, and with the help of the ulemas (senior clerics),
he tried to mount a counter-revolution on April 13, 1909 (March 31
in the Gregorian calendar) in Constantinople. Forces loyal to the
Sultan marched on Constantinople, but were defeated. The Sultan’s
counter-revolution was swiftly crushed, and Abdul-Hamid was forced to
abdicate and go into exile in Salonica. His brother Reshad immediately
succeeded him as Mehmed V. At least 250 counter-revolutionaries were
tried and executed.

For Armenians, the 1908 Young Turk revolution promised them full
citizenship and a role in the voting process, and many supported it.

As explained by Yeghiazar Karapetian, a survivor of the 1915 genocide:
"The Hurriyet (Liberty) offered freedom to all the political
prisoners, after which the Armenians, Turks and Kurds would have
equal rights. Everywhere cries of joy were heard. The law of Hurriyet
put an end to the humiliation, beating, blasphemy, robbery, plunder
and contempt of the Armenians. Anyone involved in a similar behavior
would be subject to the severest punishment; he would even be liable
to be sent to the gallows. The two nations were put in a state of
complete reliance. The Armenians would have the right of free voting,
were allowed to elect and propose their delegate. This was a new
renaissance in the life of the Western Armenians. The new parliament
in its first session issued a series of laws, among them the military
service of the Armenians in the Ottoman army."

The Armenians’ hopes were never fulfilled, as there had always been
nationalist factions within the Young Turk movement that saw Armenians
as enemies of "Turkishness". In 1896, many Muslims arrested after the
Constantinople massacres that accompanied the Ottoman Bank siege were
claimed by the Ottoman authorities to be Young Turk members.

At the time of Abdul-Hamid’s counter-revolution, resentment among his
followers in the army boiled over in Circassia, southeastern Turkey,
and Armenians would become the victims. 30,000 Armenians were said to
have been killed. Attacks took place in Adana and Tarsus (Tarshish)
on the Mediterranean coast. On April 14, Professor Herbert Adams
Gibbons, a mission teacher, in Tarsus was in Adana when the massacres
began. His wife Helen stated shortly after: "Conditions both in Tarsus
and in Adana were indescribable. I saw troops that had come apparently
to protect kill and apply the torch. There were some 4,000 refugees
that came into the mission inclosure."

Later, she would write of the massacres in a book, The Red Rugs of
Tarsus. She would record (pages 115-116) incendiary shells being fired
at Armenian houses in Tarsus: "By opening our shutters cautiously
we could hear the cruel hiss of the flames and smell kerosene in the
smoke. Then the rending and crashing of the floors made a deafening
noise, and the sparks began to alight on our property.

This is the regular order of things, – kill, loot, burn. The
Armenian quarter is the most substantial part of the city. Most of
the people store cotton on the ground floor, and this, together with
liberal applications of kerosene, served to make a holocaust. Now at
evening-time we realize our own imminent danger."

In April 1912, an election saw the CUP gain power, but a military
defeat in a conflict with Italy saw its popularity wane. In July,
a coalition called the "Liberal Union" replaced the CUP. On January
23, 1913, a coup d’etat was mounted. Three leading CUP individuals –
Ismail Enver, Mehmet Talaat and Ahmet Cemal – appointed themselves
the heads of the Ottoman Empire, adopting the title "Pasha".

Deportations And Massacres

The new leadership decided to consolidate Turkey as a "Turkish"
entity with its base in Anatolia. In October, 1912, the Balkan state
of Montenegro, followed by Serbia, Bulgaria and Greece, had declared
war on the Ottoman Empire. Turkey’s planned strategy in this Balkan
War had failed, and all of the Empire’s territories west of Catalca
(less than 20 miles from Constantinople) had been lost. Muslim refugees
from the Balkans had poured into Turkey.

The policies of enforcing Turkishness began with deportations. In early
1914, Mahmut Celal, the secretary of the CUP in Smyrna (Izmir), was
told by Mehmet Talaat Pasha to make the West coast regions entirely
"Turkish". 200,000 Greek Orthodox were forced out by paramilitary
vigilantes, settling in the Aegean islands. In May 1914, a treaty was
signed with Greece, legitimizing "repatriations" from both countries.

The presence of the Armenians was seen by the triumvirate, particularly
by interior minister Mehmet Talaat, as an impediment to their plans to
"Turkify" the nation of Turkey. Armenians were thought to be allied
more to Russia than to Turkey. After August 1914, Turkey had entered
World War One on the side of Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire,
and Russia was now officially the "enemy".

At the outbreak of World War One, many young Armenian males had been
drafted into the army, though few were trusted with weapons.

Beginning in the spring of 1915, the deportations of Armenian villagers
began. Their ultimate destination was to be the deserts of northern
Syria. No transportation was provided by officials. The trek out of
Turkey which would involve a journey of hundreds of miles, was made by
most refugees on foot. Before being rounded up, many massacres took
place in these villages. In Constantinople, Armenian intellectual
leaders were hanged.

The personal accounts of survivors of these forced marches are
heart-breaking, especially as most of these had been children when
they were uprooted. Poignantly, many express nostalgia for rustic
lives on farms and orchards before witnessing horrors of massacres,
and forced deportations. Aghvani was six years old when she was
expelled from a neighbor’s house where she, her siblings and mother had
sought sanctuary in Bitlis: " We came out; the corpses of the killed
Armenians were everywhere; they had massacred all the Armenians. Those
who were still alive, were driven we didn’t know where. On the road
there was confusion and uproar. The Turkish gendarmes drew us forward
with bayonets. At night they came and took away the young women and
girls. One day they took away my mother, too, and then they brought
her back. It was good that my father was not alive and didn’t see
himself dishonored."

Shogher Abraham Tonoyan had been born in 1901 in Vardensis village
in Mush. In August 1915: "The Turkish askyars (policemen) brought
Chechen brigands from Daghestan to massacre us. They came to our
village and robbed everything. They took away our sheep, oxen
and properties. Those who were good-looking were taken away. My
aunt’s young son, who was staying with me, was also taken away,
together with all the males in the town. They gathered the young
and the elderly in the stables of the Avzut village, set fire and
burned them alive. Those cattle-sheds were as large as those of our
collective farms. They shut people in the stables of Malkhas Mardo,
they piled up stacks of hay round them, poured kerosene and set on
fire. Sixty members of our great family were burned in those stables. I
do not wish my enemy to see the days I have seen, lao! Only I and
my brother were saved. From the beginning, they took away the young
pretty brides and girls to turkize them and also they pulled away
the male infants from their mothers’ arms to make them policemen
in the future. The stable was filled with smoke and fire, people
started to cough and to choke. Mothers forgot about their children,
lao! It was a real Sodom and Gomorrah. People ran, on fire, to and
fro, struck against the walls, trod upon the infants and children
who had fallen on the ground. …What I have seen with my eyes,
lao! I don’t wish the wolves of the mountain to see! They say that,
at these distressing scenes, the Turkish mullah hung himself. During
that turmoil the greatest part of the people choked and perished. The
roof of the stable collapsed and fell upon the dead. I wish I and my
little brother had been burned down in that stable and had not seen
how sixty souls were burned down alive. I wish I had not seen the
cruel and ungodly acts of those irreligious people. The Armenians of
the neighboring villages of Vardenis, Meshakhshen, Aghbenis, Avzut,
Khevner and others were burnt in the same manner in their stables."

The account of Souren Sargsian (born 1902), is rich in detail. He
described how the total eclipse of the sun on August 21, 1914
(Julian calendar) was seen as a portent of doom. Ismail Enver Pasha
(pictured) minister of war, visited his village of Sebastia in
December 1914. Horse races took place in the leader’s honor, and
Armenian villagers brought him salt. Enver Pasha spoke of Armenians
fighting for their Ottoman fatherland, but months later when the
Pasha returned "he had a very angry appearance; he was looking at
the people with fury and didn’t speak to the people next to him."

In late April 1915, his mother was gang-raped by Turkish gendarmes,
and then his sister, as his family had given shelter to an Armenian
politician. Soon, all the fit adult men in the village were slaughtered
on the orders of the Ottomans, leaving only a few old men. Orders came
for deportation, but before they left, the soldiers promised that if
they were given gold, they would bring back prisoners from the town.

"A gendarme, a huge notebook in his hand, was supposedly writing down
the name of the prisoner, his address, his age and so on. In a few
hours the saddle-bag was almost filled with money. In the evening
they put he saddle-bag on a horse and went away. The following day
they brought a group of men about 20-30 people, surrounded with
10 gendarmes. They brought also the well-known rich man in town,
Khelkhlik. He was very fat and was seated on a big, white donkey. The
people ran forward, expecting to find their relatives. The gendarmes
drew them back and told them to form a circle. In the center of the
circle, the chief of the gendarmes fired at Khelkhlik behind his ear.

The man fell down bleeding severely, grunting and shuddering. The
gendarmes laughed whole-heartedly, and the people were silent,
horror-stricken. Then they brought forward the others, every five-six
men hugging each other and they fired at them, then they struck them
on the head with clubs until they lay dead, then they threw them into
the torrent and went away."

His descriptions of the journey, passing rivers filled with the bloated
bodies of women, stripped naked and decomposing under the July sun, the
raids by Kurds, rapes, bayonetings and decapitations, are gruesome, but
they illustrate clearly how dehumanizing the deportation process was.

In Aleppo in Syria, the Ottoman prefect was said to be alarmed at what
to do with the numbers of tattered refugees arriving. It is recorded
that on September 15, 1915, one of the three ruling "Pashas", Mehmet
Talaat, sent the Aleppo prefect the chilling message: "You have already
been informed that the government… has decided to destroy completely
all the indicated persons living in Turkey… Their existence must be
terminated, however tragic the measures taken may be, and no regard
must be paid to either age or sex, or to any scruples of conscience."

The sending of this, and other similar telegrams, was later denied
by Mehmet Talaat. The primary source for these telegrams is a work
called Memoirs of Naim Bey, written by Aram Andonian and published in
1920. There is some doubt as to the authenticity of these purported
telegrams. It has been argued by some that once the "smoking gun" of
these telegrams is removed, claims of "genocide" cannot be made about
what happened to the Armenians. This is not true. The definition of
genocide as laid out by the United Nations in 1948 is "to destroy,
in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group."

Purgings of an entire ethnic group from a nation are de facto
genocidal. Dr Tessa Hofmann of the Free University of Berlin has
stated that in modern Turkey, only 72,000 Armenian citizens remain,
with 95% of these living in Istanbul. When one considers that before
World War One there were 2.5 to 3 million Armenians, many of whom
lived in the southeast of Turkey, where now Kurds are the largest
"minority", the terms of 1948’s description are fulfilled. The Hamidian
massacres of 1894 to 1909 were mostly carried out on the orders of the
Sultan/Caliphate and his officials. The massacres of the First World
War were carried out on the orders of local officials allied to the
CUP, and when Kurds slaughtered and robbed the caravans traveling to
Aleppo, little was done to protect the Armenians.

Official Reactions

According to a British government report, which was published in 1915
by Lord James Bryce, while the genocide was still taking place, the
Turkish government ordered at least one 1915 massacre: "Orders came
from Constantinople that all the Armenian Christians in Trebizond
(Trabzon) were to be killed. Many of the Moslems tried to save their
Christian neighbours, and offered them shelter in their houses,
but the Turkish authorities were implacable.

Obeying the orders which they had received, they hunted out all the
Christians, gathered them together, and drove a great crowd of them
down the streets of Trebizond, past the fortress, to the edge of the
sea. There they were all put on board sailing boats, carried out some
distance on the Black Sea, and there thrown overboard and drowned.

Nearly the whole Armenian population of from 8,000 to 10,000 were
destroyed – some in this way, some by slaughter, some by being sent to
death elsewhere. After that, any other story becomes credible; and
I am sorry to say that all the stories that I have received contain
similar elements of horror, intensified in some cases by stories of
shocking torture."

A German account was written by Dr Martin Niepage who was in Aleppo in
September 1915. He later visited sites such as Adana where massacres
and deportations had taken place. He stated: "The object of the
deportations is the extermination of the whole Armenian nation.

This purpose is also proved by the fact that the Turkish Government
declines all assistance from Missionaries, Sisters of Mercy and
European residents in the country, and systematically tries to stop
their work."

Niepage wrote: "What we saw with our own eyes here in Aleppo was
really only the last scene in the great tragedy of the extermination
of the Armenians. It was only a minute fraction of the horrible drama
that was being played out simultaneously in all the other provinces
of Turkey. Many more appalling things were reported by the engineers
of the Baghdad Railway, when they came back from their work on the
section under construction, or by German travellers who met the convoys
of exiles on their journeys. Many of these gentlemen had seen such
appalling sights that they could eat nothing for days.

One of them, Herr Greif, of Aleppo, reported corpses of violated women
lying about naked in heaps on the railway embankment at Tell-Abiad
and Ras-el-Ain. Another, Herr Spiecker, of Aleppo, had seen Turks
tie Armenian men together, fire several volleys of small shot with
fowling-pieces into the human mass, and go off laughing while their
victims slowly perished in frightful convulsions.

Other men had their hands tied behind their back and were rolled
down steep cliffs. Women were standing below, who slashed those
who had rolled down with knives until they were dead. A Protestant
pastor who, two years before, had given a very warm welcome to my
colleague, Doctor Graeter; when he was passing through his village,
had his finger nails torn out."

Turkey’s German allies who were aware of the fate of Armenian deportees
were advised to stay silent. One man who disobeyed such orders
was German second-lieutenant in the Sanitary Corps Armin T. Wegner,
(1886 – 1978). Wegner became stationed in the Ottoman Empire in April
1915. He took photographs, including photographs taken in the Syrian
deportation camps, where refugees were suffering from sickness and
starvation. In 1916, Wegner was transferred to Constantinople. He
brought with him his (and others’) photographic plates, which were
later used as evidence of the atrocities against Armenians.

Henry Morgenthau was US ambassador to the Ottoman Empire between 1913
and 1916. He was in no doubt that several officials in the Turkish
government intended the Armenian deportations as "exterminations". He
wrote: "One day I was discussing these proceedings with a responsible
Turkish official, who was describing the tortures inflicted. He made
no secret of the fact that the Government had instigated them, and,
like all Turks of the official classes, he enthusiastically approved
this treatment of the detested race. This official told me that all
these details were matters of nightly discussion at the headquarters
of the Union and Progress Committee. Each new method of inflicting
pain was hailed as a splendid discovery, and the regular attendants
were constantly ransacking their brains in the effort to devise some
new torment. He told me that they even delved into the records of
the Spanish Inquisition and other historic institutions of torture
and adopted all the suggestions found there. He did not tell me
who carried off the prize in this gruesome competition, but common
reputation through Armenia gave a preeminent infamy to Djevdet Bey,
the Vali of Van, whose activities in that section I have already
described. All through this country Djevdet was generally known as the
"horseshoer of Bashkale" for this connoisseur in torture had invented
what was perhaps the masterpiece of all – that of nailing horseshoes
to the feet of his Armenian victims…."

"….The real purpose of the deportation was robbery and destruction;
it really represented a new method of massacre. When the Turkish
authorities gave the orders for these deportations, they were merely
giving the death warrant to a whole race; they understood this well,
and, in their conversations with me, they made no particular attempt
to conceal the fact."

In a letter to the US Secretary of State, Morgenthau wrote on July
15, 1915: "Deportation of and excesses against peaceful Armenians
is increasing and from harrowing reports of eye witnesses it appears
that a campaign of race extermination is in progress under a pretext
of reprisal against rebellion."

Winston Churchill spoke of the Armenian genocide in the UK parliament:
"In 1915 the Turkish Government began and ruthlessly carried out
the infamous general massacre and deportation of Armenians in Asia
Minor… There is no reasonable doubt that this crime was planned
and executed for political reasons."

It is a shame that in the United States, Republicans and Democrats
have become divided over the nature of the genocide, to the point that
Republicans wish to flatter Turkey by arguing over the semantics of
the terms "massacre" and "genocide". Turkey is at fault here, from
its deliberate denial of uncomfortable facts.

The three CUP leaders – Ismail Enver, Mehmet Talaat and Ahmet Cemal –
along with several minor officials were tried in Turkey. The trials
of the three Young Turk "Pashas" took place in absentia. The three
"Pashas" died without receiving judicial punishment for their crimes.

At the end of the First World War, Ismail Enver had fled to Germany
on a boat, accompanied by Mehmet Talaat and Ahmet Cemal. On July 5,
1919 the three were found guilty of taking Turkey into World War One,
and of committing massacres against Armenians. They were sentenced
to death.

Ismail Enver died fighting the Soviets in Tajikistan on August
4, 1922. Mehmet Talaat was gunned down by an Armenian, Soghomon
Tehlirian, in Berlin in 1921. Ahmed Cemal was shot dead in Tiblisi
on July 21, 1922 by two Armenians, Stepan Dzaghiguian and Bedros
Der-Boghossian. Talaat’s and Cemal’s assassins belonged to the group
called Operation Nemesis.

Most historians accept the events that began in 1915 as "genocide".

In Turkey, one brave historian has examined Ottoman documentary
evidence from the time, and has concluded that there was an Armenian
genocide. This historian, Taner Akcam, has been jailed for publishing
his findings, under Article 301 of the Turkish penal Code – "insulting
Turkishness". A recent interview with him can be found here. During
his researches, Akcam found that "individual Turkish officers often
wrote ‘doubles’ of their mass death-sentence orders, telegrams sent at
precisely the same time that asked their subordinates to ensure there
was sufficient protection and food for the Armenians during their
‘resettlement’."

Occasionally the remains of victims of the Armenian genocide become
uncovered. In Xirabebaba in southeastern Turkey on October 17, 2006,
some Kurds were digging a grave when they uncovered a cache of skeletal
remains in a cave. About 300 individuals were found. It was assumed
that these were the 150 Armenian and 120 Syriac males from the adjacent
town of Dara (Oguz) who had been slaughtered on June 14, 1915.

The news was published in a Kurdish newspaper, but Turkish army
officials arrived and told the villagers to cover the entrance to the
cave, and claimed that stories that the bodies were Armenian were
"lies". Local police demanded to know who had leaked the discovery
to the press.

Turkey refuses to accept that the Armenian Genocide took place,
and expects its allies to collude with its campaigns of lies and
disinformation. Perhaps the House of Congress is not the best place to
discuss aspects of history, but denying history to placate a petulant
ally is undignified. Turkey still wants to join the European Union,
even though this institution has already ruled that the Armenian
Genocide did take place. The protestations and blackmailing from
Turkey’s Islamist prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and its president
Abdullah Gul should be ignored, or responded to in kind. If Turkey
threatens US interests because the US does not officially follow its
false propaganda, Turkey should realize that it has far more to lose
from a breakdown of relations with its principle NATO ally.

This article was also published at FamilySecurityMatters.org

Adrian Morgan is a British based writer and artist who has written for
Western Resistance since its inception. He has previously contributed
to various publications, including the Guardian and New Scientist
and is a former Fellow of the Royal Anthropological Society.

–Boundary_(ID_H+qdNALLDBNYGMel8O3nKg)–

http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id

Armenian patriarch visits Hollywood church

South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale)
October 17, 2007 Wednesday

Armenian patriarch visits Hollywood church: At Hollywood church,
Karekin II urges parishioners to keep the faith

by Kathleen Kernicky, South Florida Sun-Sentinel

Oct. 17–For Arice and Lilia Gharakhanian, the chance to meet their
pontiff, the spiritual leader of 7 million Armenian Christians,
doesn’t happen every day.

So the Tamarac couple and their two children, all dressed in Sunday
attire, drove to St. Mary Armenian Church in Hollywood on Tuesday,
where His Holiness Karekin II presided over prayers and the blessing
of three hand-carved stone crosses brought from Armenia.

"The Armenian community, especially in the U.S., revolves around the
church," said Arice Gharakhanian, 31, who held onto his daughters,
Sedi, 3, and Mila, 7 months. "That’s what brings us all together.
Karekin II is a symbol of our faith and our church."

Karekin II, patriarch of the Armenian Apostolic Church, concluded his
first visit to South Florida with a message to hold onto the faith,
pray for peace and "keep this church vibrant with your presence and
your prayers."

Speaking in Armenian, the 56-year-old bearded pontiff told about 200
parishioners, "The progress and advanced development we see in our
homeland fills us with hope that Armenia will prosper."

Sprinkling incense and reciting prayers, he blessed three ornamental
stone crosses, or khatchkars, carved in Armenia and delivered here
earlier this year.

"We planned about a year ago to bring these stones here as pieces
from Armenia, pieces that would give some kind of Armenian taste to
the church from the inside," said the Rev. Vartan Joulfayan, pastor
of the 500-family parish.

Wearing a gold-and-crimson robe over his black vestment and carrying
a silver staff, Karekin II warmly greeted parishioners in an opening
procession, stopping to bless men, women and children.

"This is a once-in-a-lifetime experience for most of the
parishioners," said Arbo Zakaryan, who also attended services for the
pontiff held in Boca Raton on Monday. The pontiff visited South
Florida as part of a 17-city U.S. tour.

For Armenians in the United States, the importance of a pontifical
visit cannot be underestimated, said Misak Sargsian, of Miami. He
left Armenia in 1993 and is now a physics professor at Florida
International University.

"The institution of the pontiff has existed for 1,700 years,"
Sargsian said. "It’s one thing Armenians connect to. What’s unified
Armenians all over the world is religion. With the Diaspora, the most
important thing for Armenians is keeping their identity, especially
for new generations."

Maria Esmerian, 47, wept as Karekin II blessed parishioners on his
way out of the church. Esmerian and her husband, Jack, 58, who are
both from Lebanon, drove from their home in Coral Gables to see the
pontiff.

"It’s very emotional for me," Maria Esmerian said afterward.

There are about 15,000 Armenians living in South Florida and more
than 1 million in the United States. As spiritual leader of the
world’s Armenian Christians, Karekin II is often compared to Pope
Benedict XVI of the Roman Catholic Church.

Karekin II, who has served as pontiff since 1999, lives in the holy
city of Etchmiadzin, near the Armenian capital of Yerevan.

Turkey’s political hot potato burned Pelosi

Turkey’s political hot potato burned Pelosi

By Associated Press | Saturday, October 20, 2007 |
| U.S. Politics

The two meetings House Speaker Nancy Pelosi attended before a vote on
a resolution labeling the massacre of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey a
genocide foreshadowed the biggest political misstep of her
speakership.

In the hours before a House panel approved the resolution Oct. 10,
Pelosi was told in a tense meeting with Turkey’s ambassador that the
vote would endanger his country’s alliance with the United States. She
had a warmer session with an Armenian cleric and representatives of
Armenian-Americans, who have a large presence in her home state of
California. In both, she made clear she intended to bring the
resolution to a full House vote.

Since then, Pelosi, 67, has been in retreat. Her vow to bring the
measure to a vote outraged Turkey, which recalled its ambassador and
threatened to cut off the use of its military bases to resupply U.S.
troops in Iraq.

On Oct. 17, Pelosi said "it remains to be seen" whether the vote would
occur after more than a dozen lawmakers pulled their names from the
measure and some Democrats asked her to drop it.

"It’s a good resolution but a horrible time to be considering it on
the House floor," said Rep. Mike Ross of Arkansas, one of the
Democrats who withdrew his support.

"She dug in her heels to find that she didn’t have her members with
her," said Rep. Ray LaHood, an Illinois Republican. "If you get too
far out in front of them, it can be embarrassing."

The turnaround is the first major failure for Pelosi, who has
successfully muscled through the agenda she set out when she became
leader of the Democratic majority in January.

Source: /view.bg?articleid=1039272

http://www.bostonherald.com
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics

Politicians should stay home

Fergus Falls Daily Journal, MN
Oct 19 2007

Politicians should stay home
By Dave Churchill (Contact) | The Daily Journal

It sometimes seems like there’s this fever of oddness that must
permeate the halls of Congress. How else to explain the fervor with
which so many representatives were, until recently, signing on to a
resolution that would have condemned genocide?

It sounds like a worthy cause, a good stand for Congress and the
United States to take – until it becomes clear that the genocide in
question occurred in 1915. More than 90 years ago, the Ottoman Empire
slaughtered a huge number of innocent Armenians – a horrible thing.
But why, one has to wonder, was Congress debating it now?

Of course, there probably wouldn’t have been any debate until the
modern Turkish government (none of whose members, it should be noted,
were even alive in 1915) got itself into a snit because it thought
the United States was about to make Turkey look bad.

It all turned into a big fur ball and, at last count, representatives
are backing away from the resolution faster than they signed on in
the first place.

I am sure that for at least a few Americans of Armenian descent, this
is a hot issue. But I couldn’t help laughing out loud at one news
account that noted the resolution would have been `non-binding.’
What’s next, a resolution condemning Caesar for invading Gaul? That
only happened a couple of millennia ago.

Kidding aside, how did this Armenian Ottoman thing ever get so far
down the legislative pipe? Why didn’t someone pop up sooner and say,
`Hey, don’t we have some actual business to attend to?’ Don’t we have
some issues – Iraq, budgets, global warming – on which we could take
action that is useful?

It’s just one more reason that Congress – and the state legislature,
too – should adopt my keep-the-lawmakers-home plan. Despite the jokey
name, it’s a serious idea, but one that is apparently before its
time.

Instead of convening hundreds of representatives and senators in
Washington, where they spend most of their time associating with each
other and with the highly paid lobbyists who are there to influence
government, why not make lawmakers work from their home communities?
With today’s technology, any member of Congress could sit in a comfy
little meeting room in her or his home town, surrounded by big-screen
monitors that show all the other lawmakers with whom contact is
necessary. And there, in the office, would be a dozen or so
comfortable chairs for interested local residents to drop by and keep
an eye on things.

It means our representatives would be eating lunch at the downtown
diner, attending school concerts and shopping for groceries after
work right in the midst of even the busiest legislative periods.
Plenty of opportunity for them to hear from those they are supposed
to be representing – instead of from lobbyists.

Can you imagine the conversation at the check-out line?

`Hey, Congressman, what are you voting on today?’

`Well, we’re thinking of condemning a 90-something-year-old act of
genocide in the Middle East.’

`Huh?’

This stay-at-home plan would definitely keep things focused a little
better in Washington – or, rather, in Congress, wherever it happens
to be. Wouldn’t be so much fun for those who enjoy the Washington
power game, though.

I don’t have any expectation this will ever happen. It makes too much
sense.

s/2007/oct/19/politicians-should-stay-home/

http://www.fergusfallsjournal.com/new

ANKARA; US official regrets Armenian genocide resolution

Anatolia News Agency, Turkey
Oct 18 2007

US official regrets Armenian genocide resolution

Eskisehir: American-Turkish Council (ATC) Chairman Brent Scowcroft
said he felt quite sorry as USA did not support its long time ally
and strategical partner Turkey as it should be, regarding the war on
terror and PKK [Kurdistan Workers’ Party] terrorism.

Attending a meeting held in Eskisehir, Scowcroft expressed his views
on a resolution concerning Armenian allegations on incidents of 1915
and which was recently approved by the foreign affairs committee of
the US House of Representatives.

Scowcroft said they worked hard together with the US government to
stop the adoption of the resolution, however they were unsuccessful.

Describing the adoption of the resolution as a "political decision",
Scowcroft said that the resolution could harm economic relations
between Turkey and the USA. He said it was adopted without taking
into consideration the strategical friendship (between Turkey and the
USA), national security and the US economy.

Scowcroft also said he hoped the resolution would not be brought to
the floor of the House of Representatives.

UN Agency Hails Decreased Malnutrition In Armenia

UN AGENCY HAILS DECREASED MALNUTRITION IN ARMENIA
By Anna Saghabalian

Radio Liberty, Czech rep.
Oct 17 2007

The proportion of Armenians suffering from malnutrition has declined
considerably in recent years and is no longer high by international
standards, a senior official from the United Nations Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) said on Wednesday.

Maria Kadlecikova, the FAO representative to Europe and Central Asia,
welcomed Armenian government data that show the malnutrition rate
falling from 2.8 percent to 1.8 percent between 2002 and 2005.

"You achieved a great improvement in the years 2002-2005," she said.

"This means that the number of those who are undernourished
significantly decreased [in this period.]"

Kadlecikova cautioned, however, that the number of underfed people
in Armenia has not changed since 2005. "This number is not so high,"
she told reporters in Yerevan. "It is improving, but at this moment
we are noting that it is stagnating."

The government portrays the improved nutrition as a further indication
that Armenia’s double-digit economic growth has benefited all segments
of the population. According to government statistics, the percentage
of Armenians living below the official poverty line shrank from 50
percent to 33 percent between 1999 and 2004 and has dropped further
since then. In its policy program approved by parliament in June,
the government forecast that the poverty rate will fall below 12
percent by 2012.

ANKARA: Congressman Miller: Resolution Won’t Accomplish Much

CONGRESSMAN MILLER: RESOLUTION WON’T ACCOMPLISH MUCH

The New Anatolian, Turkey
Oct 16 2007

U.S. Representative Brad Miller says "Holocaust" denial is morally
repugnant but warns that the current genocide resolution passed in
the committee of which he is a member will only anger Turkey and will
not accomplish much.

Miller voted against the genocide resolution.

He is the only member of North Carolina’s congressional delegation on
the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which voted last week to declare
the Ottoman-Turkish killings of Armenians in 1915, in which as many
as 1.5 million people may have died, a "genocide."

Speaking to the press at the committee room sitting near three
survivors of the event, all of them women in their 90s, Miller said
he doesn’t think the U.S. has the international standing to offend
an important ally such as Turkey.

Miller, a Raleigh Democrat, told congressional committee meeting he
didn’t think the resolution would accomplish much.

"I wish we had the standing in the world that if we pass that
resolution, Turkey would stop and examine the history of what happened
and decide whether they should do something to come to terms with
it," Miller said. "But the reality is, in Turkey and the Muslim world
generally, they will simply see the resolution as an insult and will
be angry about it."

After the committee’s vote, Turkey recalled its ambassador for
consultations.

"There is a genocide going on now in Darfur. We need the support
of Turkey and other Muslim countries to try to bring it to an end,"
Miller said.

In the days leading up to the vote, Miller spoke with the Turkish
ambassador and a deputy U.S. secretary of state. He also heard from
members of North Carolina’s Turkish-American community.

Miller said he thinks that Holocaust denial is morally repugnant,
that he was glad Congress apologized for the internment of
Japanese-Americans in World War II and that he voted for a resolution
encouraging Japan to apologize for its treatment of "comfort women"
in the same war.

Still, he said, it’s difficult to know which points in history deserve
modern action.

"Over the course of human history, there’s been remarkable evil,"
he said. "And trying to sort through it all, to acknowledge it all,
I think requires the wisdom of a theologian, not just a politician,"
he concluded.

ANKARA: Turkey Loses Jewish Alliance

TURKEY LOSES JEWISH ALLIANCE
Umit Enginsoy

Turkish Daily News
Oct 15 2007
Turkey

Turkey fails to secure the support of Jewish members in the committee
that gives the U.S. House the go ahead to vote on a resolution to
recognize the events of 1915 as ‘genocide.

Last week’s congressional panel vote in favor of an "Armenian genocide"
resolution has also underlined Turkey’s failure to win the backing
of the committee’s Jewish members despite Ankara’s focused efforts
to woo those lawmakers and Israel.

Seven out of eight Jewish lawmakers in the 50-member Foreign Affairs
Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, including Tom Lantos,
the panel’s powerful chairman and the only Holocaust survivor in
Congress, voted in favor of the genocide bill in last Wednesday’s
mark-up. The resolution calls for recognition of World War-I era
Armenian killings in the Ottoman Empire as genocide.

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced late last week that
she will bring the measure to a House floor vote before Congress’
current session ends on Thanksgiving Day, which is Nov. 22 this year.

In such a vote the resolution is expected to pass easily, as it
already has 226 cosponsors in the 435-member House.

All eight Jewish representatives in the committee were Democrats,
most of whom are involved in a major confrontation with the Republican
administration over President George W. Bush’s foreign policy.

Among them, the only one to vote against the resolution was Robert
Wexler of Florida, cochairman of the Turkish Caucus in Congress.

Overall, the measure passed the committee 27-21 – 19 Democrats and
eight Republicans in favor, and eight Democrats and 13 Republicans
opposed – despite last-minute warnings from Bush and his top aides
that the resolution would harm U.S. national interests.

The Lantos factor

Top Bush administration officials and Turkish leaders warn that
Ankara may cut its assistance to the United States’ efforts in Iraq
and Afghanistan in the event the resolution passes on the House floor.

In addition to Lantos, a representative from California, Gary
Ackerman and Eliot Engel of New York, Howard Berman and Brad Sherman
of California, Ron Klein of Florida and Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona
voted for the bill among the Jewish Congress members.

For the Turks, the biggest dismay was Lantos’ vote. In a long
introduction at the opening of the mark-up, Lantos said: "We have to
weigh the desire to express our solidarity with the Armenian people
and to condemn the historic nightmare through the use of the word
‘genocide,’ against the risk that it could cause young men and women in
the uniform of the United States armed services to pay an even heavier
price [in Iraq and Afghanistan] than they are currently paying."

And when Lantos announced his vote, Turkish parliamentary deputies
and diplomats present at the mark-up were shocked and angered.

This was the third time the same panel approved a genocide bill in
the past seven years. But in 2000, former president Bill Clinton
personally intervened at the last minute and prevented a House floor
vote. And in 2005, the bill passed by the committee reached nowhere
as then House speaker Dennis Hastert, a close ally of Bush, refused
to bring it to the floor.

Lantos was the staunchest supporter of Turkey in the 2000 discussions
of the genocide resolution. But in 2005, angered by the Turkish
government’s rapprochement with Syria and Iran, he voted for the bill
"to punish Ankara" although he admitted that the Armenian killings
did not amount to a genocide.

Jewish lawmakers unimpressed by Turkish lobbying

Egemen Baðýs, a top foreign policy adviser to Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdoðan and a deputy from the ruling Justice and Development
Party (AKP), criticized Lantos’ stance, saying, "we have seen that
his understanding of history is changing in time."

Despite the color of their votes, Lantos and Ackerman also sought to
appease Turkey. Lantos said that he would soon introduce a resolution
marking the U.S.-Turkish friendship. Ackerman said: "This has been
tough for me… I’m a big fan and supporter of Turkey."

Turkish diplomats had made a major effort to urge the committee’s
Jewish members to vote against the resolution. Turkey also lobbied
Israel, with Foreign Minister Ali Babacan recently visiting Yad Vashem,
or the Holocaust museum.

After the Anti-Defamation League, a leading U.S. Jewish group,
shifted its position on the controversy in August, recognizing last
century’s Armenian killings as "tantamount to genocide," Turkey said
the resolution’s eventual approval on the House floor could adversely
affect its close relations with Israel.

But the panel vote proved that Ankara’s warning did not impress the
committee’s Jewish members.

Among them, Sherman, Ackerman, Berman and Engel have consistently voted
for genocide resolutions over the past seven years, while Wexler has
consistently opposed the measures. Klein and Giffords, two junior
lawmakers who are not among the latest measure’s cosponsors, acted
in line with the majority of their fellow Jewish congressmen.

The Bush administration strongly lobbied on Turkey’s behalf before
the vote, managing to persuade several Republicans to vote against
the genocide measure. For instance, Illeana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida,
the ranking Republican member in the committee and earlier a strong
supporter of the Armenian cause, voted against the bill.

In another interesting example, Luis Fortuno, a Republican
representative from Puerto Rico, said he decided to vote against the
resolution after Bush personally called him on his cell phone and
lobbied in Spanish.

–Boundary_(ID_yjynqWwzSuGAJq+8O5IH8g)–

Turkey and the US on collision course

Financial Times, UK
Oct 14 2007

Turkey and the US on collision course

Published: October 14 2007 18:38 | Last updated: October 14 2007
18:38

Collisions between allies rarely come much bigger than the current
spat between the US and Turkey: Ankara has recalled its ambassador to
Washington, outraged at a vote in Congress declaring the massacres of
Armenians by Ottoman Turks in 1915 to be genocide.

The vote, by the foreign affairs committee of the House of
Representatives, has yet to go to a full vote and does not reflect
the view of the Bush administration, which lobbied fiercely against
it. Indeed, eight former secretaries of state signed a letter to
Nancy Pelosi, the House speaker, warning of repercussions for US
national security.

Ms Pelosi and the main sponsor of the bill, Adam Schiff, who both
represent Californian districts with big Armenian populations,
brushed all this aside. Now for the fall-out.

The relationship between these Nato allies had already deteriorated
as a result of the US invasion of Iraq and policy in the Middle East.
The architects of the Iraq war are still angry about the Turkish
parliament’s refusal to allow the US to open a northern front from
Turkey’s soil. Turkey is incensed by the occupation’s consecration of
a de facto state in Iraqi Kurdistan, which it believes encourages
secession by Kurds in south-east Turkey, and is a base to relaunch
insurgency by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party.

After the Armenian vote, Ankara is likely to ignore US pleas and send
in its forces to flush out the rebels, opening a new front in the
multi-sided civil war in Iraq and further destabilising the region.
Turkey may also start to sever links with the US military and deny it
the use of the Incirlik base, one of the main conduits for American
troops and supplies into Iraq.

But the worst of it is that nine out of 10 Turks are now hostile to
the US, whose policies are feeding a revival of rightwing nationalism
and radical Islam. These are not problems that will be resolved by
gesture politics in the US Congress.

The Turkish republic of Ataturk is not responsible for the atrocities
committed against the Armenians by the Ottoman Empire. But nor can it
evade this blood-soaked chapter of Turkish history.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the prime minister, has called on international
scholars to establish the facts and offered them access to the
Ottoman archives. Nothing has happened because his neo-Islamist
government has been locked in a test of wills with the army – which
regards itself as the guardian of national honour. Modern Turkey
needs to settle this account with history. It will not do so if it
believes foreigners are out to do down the country resurrected from
Ottoman ruins.

Will Pargev Ohanyan be punished?

A1+

WILL PARGEV OHANYAN BE PUNISHED?
[03:25 pm] 12 October, 2007

The Council for Justice upheld the decision of the Disciplinary
Commission and petitioned RA President Robert Kocharian to suspend
Pargev Ohanyan’s powers.

To remind, disciplinary proceedings were taken against Pargev Ohanyan,
a judge of Kentron and Nork-Marash communities. The investigation
revealed `insignificant shortcomings,’ advocate Haik Alumyan says.

The Justice Board declined to comment on the decision. Nevertheless,
the last word is after Robert Kocharian to justify or to punish Pargev
Ohanyan.

During an interview with A1+ Pargev Ohanyan voiced hope that the RA
President will have mercy on him and will not annul his powers.

To A1+’s question whether he regrets for his verdict on `Royal
Armenia,’ Ohanyan said, `Surely not. A judge must not regret for his
verdict.

According to Mr. Ohanyan, the judicial system is far from being
independent both subjectively and objectively. Alongside with apparent
drawbacks, judges are bound by the law.