Why Moscow Doesn’t Have A Lot Of Friends

WHY MOSCOW DOESN’T HAVE A LOT OF FRIENDS
By Georgy Bovt

The Moscow Times
April 10 2008
Russia

Some members of Moscow’s political establishment considered the recent
NATO summit in Bucharest a partial victory since Georgia and Ukraine
were not invited to join the alliance. But far from saying "no,"
NATO promised that these countries would eventually become members.

But the main questions for Moscow are: Why are two members of the
Commonwealth of Independent States so eager to join NATO? Why do
our allies want to establish closer ties with the West? Why does the
prospect of better relations with Russia hold so little appeal?

Russia currently has only two staunch allies among CIS countries. The
first is Armenia — a country that is going through difficult
economic times, is dependent upon Russia for its energy supplies
and has chilly relations with most of its other neighbors. Russia’s
other ally is Belarus, a rogue state ruled by a dictator with whom
even Moscow sometimes has difficulty maintaining a dialogue.

The Kremlin has a few theories as to why the former Soviet republics
find NATO membership so appealing. The most popular explanation is
the conspiracy theory. This scenario has the United States continuing
its Cold War struggle for global influence by displacing Russia as
the dominant player in the CIS region. According to this theory,
Washington wins the favor of the political elite in the republics
and then foments color revolutions against Moscow to prevent it from
regaining power. Conspiracy theorists believe that the United States’
main objective is to seize Russia’s limitless natural resources and
take direct control of the country, or else to exercise indirect
control by reducing Russia to an "appendage of the West" that
submissively supplies it with raw materials.

According to this theory, the foreign policy of the United States
and its allies reflects a single aim: to encroach upon Russia using
every weapon in its arsenal — propaganda, economic pressure and even
direct military intervention.

A competing theory holds that the political elite in the former
Soviet republics are the ones pushing for NATO’s expansion. These
leaders supposedly view their countries as being too small to have any
voice among European nations unless they gain membership in powerful
international organizations such as NATO or the European Union. Some
among the Russian elite believe that Ukraine and Georgia fear losing
their status as independent countries unless they join NATO or the
European Union.

These different views reflect the worldviews of the various factions
within Russia’s political elite. Any attempt to dissuade them from
these convictions is futile. Anti-Western, and especially anti-U.S.,
sentiment has reached such heights that the Kremlin summarily dismisses
worthy arguments without even listening.

While these theorists heap scorn on the West, they don’t bother
to ask whether Russia could be a more appealing partner for its
neighbors. Using the energy card as a negotiating tool against other
countries clearly won’t do the trick. Neither will preaching about the
virtues of a multipolar world and the vices of a U.S.-led unipolar
world, and taking every possible opportunity to criticize the West
while rejecting any constructive proposals it puts forward.

Russia must first offer its own society — and only later the world
— an attractive model for development that other countries would
want to follow. The government should formulate a set of political
principles that it would be able to manifest in actual deeds, not
just words. Only then can these values and principles gradually take
root in Russian society.

Then, Moscow’s foreign policy would serve as a logical continuation
of those principles practiced at home. Unfortunately, this strategy
is not part of the Kremlin’s agenda.

Georgy Bovt is a political analyst and hosts a radio program on
City-FM.

New OSCE Chairman Urges Solution Of Region’s Frozen Conflicts

NEW OSCE CHAIRMAN URGES SOLUTION OF REGION’S FROZEN CONFLICTS

armradio.am
10.04.2008 17:49

The OSCE needs to focus on the issues where it can make a real
difference, including solving the region’s frozen conflicts, the
OSCE Chairman-in-Office, newly appointed Finnish Foreign Minister
Alexander Stubb, told the Organization’s Permanent Council today.

"We must seriously look for solutions to the so-called frozen
conflicts. My aim is to re-energize efforts towards peaceful
settlement of these conflicts," said the Chairman-in-Office. "I
sincerely hope that the efforts of the Finnish Chairmanship are met
with constructive engagement by all parties. I continue to support
the existing negotiation mechanisms, including the OSCE Minsk Group
and its Co-Chairs."

The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, which is working to find a
solution for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, are France, Russia and
the United States.

Stubb, who was appointed as Foreign Minister of Finland on 4 April,
also expressed concern over recent incidents in Nagorno-Karabakh and
South Ossetia and appealed to all parties to refrain from violence.

Humanitarian Aid Of 78m Usd Imported To Armenia Last Year

HUMANITARIAN AID OF 78M USD IMPORTED TO ARMENIA LAST YEAR

Noyan Tapan
April 10, 2008

YEREVAN, APRIL 10, NOYAN TAPAN. Work done during 2007 within the
framework of the charity program was taken into consideration at the
RA government’s April 10 sitting. As Simon Ter-Simonian, the Chairman
of the Coordination Committee of Charity Programs of RA government,
informed journalists after the sitting, 126 international and local
organizations implemented charity programs in the country last
year. The Hayastan All Armenian Fund, the Armenian branch of the
U.S. Fund for Armenian Relief, the Armenian Evangelical Association,
and a number of other organizations implemented most large-scale
programs in various spheres.

S. Ter-Simonian said that cargoes with the total customs value of
24.48bn drams (nearly 78m USD) were imported from 40 countries to
Armenia last year, including medicines of 13.9bn drams. According to
him, nearly 72% imported cargoes are of healthcare sphere and only
1.2% are foodstuffs. At that, 76.4% cargoes were received from the
United States.

Christina Binkley On Las Vegas And The Gaming Industry

CHRISTINA BINKLEY ON LAS VEGAS AND THE GAMING INDUSTRY
by Paul Comstock

California Literary Review

April 10 2008
CA

CLR INTERVIEW: Christina Binkley is a columnist for the Wall Street
Journal and spent ten years as their lead reporter covering Las
Vegas. Her new book, Winner Takes All, recounts the phenomenal growth
of Las Vegas and America’s gaming industry. Below is Christina’s
interview with the California Literary Review.

Winner Takes All: Steve Wynn, Kirk Kerkorian, Gary Loveman, and the
Race to Own Las Vegas

by Christina Binkley

Hyperion, 320 pp. As the subtitle of your book suggests, there are
three major players in the Las Vegas casino industry. Would you give
us an overview of their backgrounds and management style as well as
their current holdings? Let’s start with Steve Wynn.

Steve Wynn is the showman of the group and the one who has built his
fortune with charismatic leadership as well as gritty chutzpah. The
spoiled eldest son of an East coast bingo operator, he’s an Ivy League
college graduate and a passionate art collector. He has a wild temper
that can swing from fury to humor at a moment’s notice. People who
work closely with him find that he will flatter them fantastically
one day, and brutally harangue them the next. I think that he is
often unaware of how loud and mean he is perceived as being. Wynn is
a substantial shareholder in the company he took public, Wynn Resorts,
and owns homes in Las Vegas; Sun Valley, Idaho; and New York City.

How about Kirk Kerkorian?

Kirk Kerkorian, a generation older than Wynn, is the son of Armenian
immigrants and was raised first in central California and later in Los
Angeles, where he wound up in reform school-though he doesn’t seem to
have been as troubled as today’s youths who end up in reform school. As
a youth, he worked to help support his parents and siblings. He made
is first fortune in aviation. The casino and movie businesses were
his mid-life career and while casinos have made him richer and more
famous, he manages them quietly and from afar as investments rather
than getting involved in operations. His wealth is tied up in two
entities, Tracinda Corp., which owns most of his various businesses,
and the Lincy Foundation, his charitable enterprise.

Finally, Gary Loveman.

The youngest generation of the three, Gary Loveman never expected to
be a mogul of any sort. He grew up in a blue collar Indiana family
and married his high school sweetheart while pursuing a career in
academics. As one of MIT’s top PhD candidates in economics, he accepted
an offer to teach at Harvard Business School. It was a part-time
consulting gig that led him to Harrah’s Entertainment, but his canny
ideas about marketing to low-roller gamblers eventually earned him
the top job at the company. A few mega-deals later, he’s richer than
his wildest dreams (but not nearly as rich as Wynn and Kerkorian)
and seated at the helm of the world’s largest gambling company.

Your book gives a fascinating insight into the data that’s collected
on gamblers by Harrah’s and how it is used.

While Wynn and Kerkorian catered to high rollers, Harrah’s has long
focused on low rollers. It’s not hard to know your best customers,
keeping track of their birthdays and personal proclivities, but it’s
very difficult to know enough about the multitude of low rollers to
market to them effectively. Harrah’s took the scientific approach,
studying gamblers the way Pavlov studied animal behavior. They tracked
customers’ behavior in casinos, recording how fast they hit a slot
machine button, how long they gamble, and so on-and noting how they
respond to marketing offers such as free food, cash to gamble with,
etc. After years of collecting this data, Harrah’s has created what
some call a "secret recipe" of how to get gamblers to gamble more at
Harrah’s casinos.

One of the depressing things about casinos is watching people gamble
away money it doesn’t look like they can afford to lose. What are
the moral implications of the casino industry using its insights into
the behavior of gamblers to extract more and more money from them?

Casino executives like to make the free will argument-that most
people have the ability to choose between gambling and walking out
the door. The evidence suggests that this is true for most people.

Unfortunately, it’s often the most vulnerable people that get taken
advantage of-just as in the subprime mortgage industry-when highly
sophisticated marketers focus their smarts on less advantaged people
who are chasing a dream. Some casino executives are troubled by
this-my book focuses on one of Harrah’s leading marketing executives,
Rich Mirman, who became troubled by his own methods and innovations.

You mention in your book Steve Wynn’s "genius at social
stratification."

At Wynn Las Vegas, for instance, there is a special and very luxurious
entrance for guests who pay, or are invited to stay in the "Tower
Suites"-hotel rooms that are no larger or different than the rest of
the hotel other than that they have this special entrance and more
intimate front desk. The swimming pool for these suites is literally
above and overlooking the pool for regular folk-so Tower Suite guests
can look down on the hoi polloi. In fact, the whole resort has been
designed to allow these patrons to move around in their own private
sphere. This allows the Wynn to cater to celebrities, business leaders
and others who generally have avoided Las Vegas in the past for its
lack of intimate luxurious offerings.

By catering so skillfully to these folks as well as the masses who keep
his slot machines going, Wynn manages to have his cake and eat it too.

At one time Vegas marketed itself as a family resort. That seems to
have gone by the wayside. How does Vegas see itself now?

Vegas is proudly Sin City once again. The family-resort episode was
revealed as a mistake within months of the openings of a series of
family friendly casinos like the MGM Grand and Treasure Island and
Excalibur. The problem for Las Vegas, though, is that it was stuck
with those casinos long after. The MGM Grand has demolished its Oz
theme, though, and Treasure Island has renovated away the last of
its child-friendly attractions.

It’s hard to imagine Las Vegas building more elaborate and expensive
casinos and continuing to make money, but I guess the pessimists have
always been proved wrong. How do you see things playing out over say,
the next ten years in Las Vegas and also throughout the United States?

There’s no way the planned 40,000 new hotel rooms will be built
there-yet. The current economy will force developers to slow down their
plans in the near term. But in the next ten years, we’ll see far bigger
and more sophisticated resorts opening than are operating today-with
more retail, entertainment and restaurants. CityCenter is the first
of these new style resorts, which are really more like cities, with
condos and interconnected hotels, retail districts and entertainment
zones. Harrah’s, which has plans for something similar yet potentially
bigger, is exploring how to use communications technology like texting
to encourage resort guests to remain within the Harrah’s sphere rather
than migrating to rival properties.

Because of the cash generated from gambling, Las Vegas is in the
forefront of the vast new world of retail and commerce-what we’ll
see there in 10 years, we’ll see elsewhere in 15-not just in terms
of casinos, but also in shopping malls and theme parks.

We’ll also see more regional and Native-American-owned casinos opening
up around the country, and more power concentrated in the hands of
the wealthy Indian tribes who own some of them.

In Bethlehem, Pennsylvania they’re building a casino where the huge
Bethlehem Steel plant used to operate. To me, it’s symbolic of a
country that once produced items of value to the world, now gambling
away its wealth.

Bingo! To coin a hackneyed phrase. I agree that it’s symbolic of
a country that once produced items of value, but is now creating
entertainment that offers little of value other than diversion, and
it’s produced by employees who are paid far more poorly than their
predecessors in manufacturing.

http://calitreview.com/topics/business/543/

BAKU: Ankara Is Most Reliable And Strategic Partner Of Israel In Mid

ANKARA IS MOST RELIABLE AND STRATEGIC PARTNER OF ISRAEL IN MIDDLE EAST: HIGH RANK TURKISH MP

Trend News Agency
April 9 2008
Azerbaijan

Israel, Jerusalem, 9 April / corr. TrendNews R. Abdullayev/ Turkey is
the most reliable and strategic partner of Israel in the Middle East,
said Murat Marjan, the chairman of International Relations Committee
of Turkish parliament.

"There is a serious and enhanced strategic cooperation between our
two countries which covers all spheres of cooperation on the highest
political level," said Marjan in his interview with TrendNews.

Commenting on results of the visit of Turkish delegation to Jerusalem,
Marjan said that meetings have been held with political elite and
government figures of Israel. "The economic relations are on high
level, but I believe that the potential has not been used fully. The
trade turnover between Turkey and Israel makes up $2.5bln and I
am hopeful that this figure will reach $5bln in next 5 years,"
said Marjan.

The Turkish MP stressed the significance of cooperation in fight
against terrorism. "We have been to Sederot and witnessed that the
activities of HAMAS, especially the rocket fires to Israeli territory
are inadmissible," he said. According to Marjan, the citizens of
Gaza suffer from Israeli military operations. "Therefore, Turkey’s
only aim is to reach peace, stability, prosperity and security in the
Middle East. We support all peace initiatives contributing to peace,"
said Marjan.

" Turkey believes that the settlement of conflict between Israel and
Palestine is a key to addressing a number of Middle East problems.

>From this standpoint, we support all diplomatic efforts made to solve
these problems," said Marjan.

Turkey Moves On Freedom Of Speech

TURKEY MOVES ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH

EurActiv
ement/turkey-moves-freedom-speech/article-171423
A pril 8 2008
Belgium

Just days before Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso’s visit
to Ankara, the Turkish government has introduced a bill to soften a
controversial article in the country’s penal code outlawing criticism
of Turkish identity.

Brussels has identified reform of the penal code’s Article 301 as a
priority of the country’s preparations for EU accession.

Speaking to EurActiv in October last year, the EU’s enlargement
commissioner, Olli Rehn, highlighted freedom of expression as "the
first and foremost priority" for Turkey on its path to reform. "This
means that Article 301 must be repealed or revised," he said (EurActiv
23/10/07).

The main change to the so-called "Turkishness" article is that the
permission of the President would be needed to approve prosecutions
related to cases where Turkish identity or the country’s institutions
have been insulted, Turkish media reported yesterday (7 April).

The proposed amendment would also decrease the maximum punishment
from three to two years and replace the wording "denigrating Turkish
identity" with "denigrating the Turkish nation" in an effort to
eliminate the law’s vague notion of "Turkishness".

The existing Article 301 has been used as the basis of a number of
cases against authors and journalists in the last two years, including
the Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk and the Turkish-Armenian journalist
Hrant Dink, who was murdered last year because of his convictions.

The spokesperson of Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn, Krisztina Nagy,
said that the Commission was monitoring the developments closely. "If
these amendments succeed in better protecting freedom of expression,
they will be welcome," she said.

The EU has repeatedly called on the government of Prime Minister Tayyip
Erdogan to amend or scrap the article if Turkey is to prove it is
serious in its bid to join the Union. But although the governing AKP
party has pledged to reform Article 301 many times in recent years,
its has thus far never followed up with concrete action.

The announcement could, however, be seen as part of a broader
government initiative to reaffirm its EU commitment, including a
comprehensive strategy to tackle corruption and harmonise regulations
on unions and strikes.

"Article 301 of the Turkish penal code is one of the priority areas
that needs to be addressed," an official from the Turkish Secretariat
General for EU affairs told the Turkish Daily News.

"But it is not the only one," she added, calling for six other
regulations which restrict the freedom of speech to be modified. She
also urged the Turkish Parliament to agree to the changes "as soon
as possible".

The opposition far-right Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) said it
will oppose any changes related to Article 301. But the AKP’s clear
majority in Parliament would allow it to pass the bill without
additional votes from the opposition.

The government claims that the article’s new provisions will prevent
nationalist prosecutors from exploiting the law to serve their own
political agenda.

http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlarg

RPA Supports Tigran Sargsyan For Prime Minister

RPA SUPPORTS TIGRAN SARGSYAN FOR PRIME MINISTER

PanARMENIAN.Net
08.04.2008 16:06 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The ruling Republican Party of Armenia supports the
nomination of Central Bank President Tigran Sargsyan for the post of
Prime Minister.

The decision to nominate Tigran Sargsyan was taken owing to the rich
experience of the CB President and the RPA’s intention to implement
large-scale economic programs, said Galust Sahakyan, the RPA chairman,
Novosti Armenia reports.

According to Article 55 of the RA Constitution, the President appoints
the Prime Minister within ten days after accepting the government’s
resignation. The government is formed during 20 days after the Prime
Minister assumes the office.

Inauguration of Armenia’s President-elect will take place on April 9.