Author: Vardapetian Ophelia

NKR: Material Aid To Veterans

Vardapetian Ophelia

MATERIAL AID TO VETERANS

Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
29 April 05

The NKR minister of social security Lenston Ghulian informed that by
the government decision N 158 on celebration of the 60th anniversary
of the Victory in Great Patriotic War, the day of the NKR Defense Army
and liberation of Shushi adopted on March 29, 2005 certain groups of
people in NKR will receive lump-sum material aid from the state
budget. The distribution of the aid began on April 26. The aid is
provided to certain groups of people in Stepanakert, the regions of
Askeran, Martuni, Martakert, Hadrut, Shushi, Kashatagh. The disabled
of Great Patriotic War and people granted an equal status will receive
20 thousand drams each, persons who participated in the military
actions during Great Patriotic War will receive 17 thousand drams
each, persons granted an equal status 15 thousand drams each, families
of azatamartiks killed during the NKR defence 10 thousand drams each,
disabled servicemen in NKR 4 thousand drams, sole pensioners who do
not work will receive 3 thousand drams each.

AA.
29-04-2005

CR: United Nations Accountability Act

Vardapetian Ophelia

Representative Louis ‘Louie’ Gohmert (TX) Republican

[Congressional Record: April 28, 2005 (House)]
[Page H2727-H2732]
>From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr28ap05-87]

United Nations Accountability Act

Mr. GOHMERT. Madam Speaker, I do have another bill that has not yet
been filed. We are in the process of gathering sponsors for this bill,
and I have simply entitled it the United Nations Accountability Act. It
is high time we did have some accountability from the U.N.
So what this bill does, it just simply says, and I can just read the
first prohibition. It says simply, United States assistance may not be
provided to a country that opposed the position of the United States in
the United Nations. It goes on to define that as meaning that, opposed
the position of the United States means that the country’s votes in the
United Nations General Assembly during the most recent session of the
General Assembly, and in the case of a country which is a member of the
United Nations Security Council, the country’s votes in the Security
Council during the most recent session were the same as the position of
the United States less than 50 percent of the time, using for this
purpose the overall percentage of voting coincidences set forth in the
annual report submitted to Congress pursuant to section 406 of the
Foreign Relations Authorization Act, fiscal years 1990 and 1991. That
is just the date of the act.
Each year, on March 31, there is a requirement for a new report to be
filed, and in that report, it sets out the votes of all the member
nations. And from that, Madam Speaker, you would be shocked, I imagine,
to know but from that we have gleaned the following information. We
have also gone through and pulled information, most recent we could
find, as to how much U.S. aid is being given to other country.
I want to make this clear. I believe with all my heart every nation
is a sovereign nation. Every nation has the right to make its own
decisions. In the event a nation becomes a threat and threatens those
around it, as Nazi Germany did, as Mussolini’s Italy did, as Saddam
Hussein’s Iraq did, then it becomes necessary for self-defense. In

[[Page H2729]]

Texas, it is just plain old self-defense. In the event it is reasonably
necessary to protect yourself, it is self-defense. We have defended
this world and our country, and we have done it well, and that is a
different matter.
Barring the situation like that, every country gets to make their own
decisions. However, this is the United States of America. We do not
have to pay people to hate us. We do not have to pay people to vote
against us at every turn in the U.N. They want to do that; that is
fine. What this bill says is you want to vote against us all the time
in the U.N., you want to be a constant burr in our saddle, you want to
cause trouble for this country, fine, but we do not have to pay you to
do it.
Running down some of the countries, do you know, Madam Speaker, the
nation of Egypt, great rich history in that nation, Egypt; apparently
U.S. aid is around $1.86 billion and the percentage of the time that
Egypt has voted with the United States in this last session that we
just got the report from in March, 8.5 percent of the time. They are
voting against us 91.5 percent of the time and we are paying them $1.86
billion.
Let me mention also before I go through some of the other highlights
of nations that were on this list, another thing about this assistance
is defined in my bill. The term “United States assistance” means
assistance under chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of
1961 that relates to the Economic Support Fund. Under chapter 5 of part
II of that act, it relates to international military education and
training and also the foreign military financing program account under
section 23 of the Arms Export Control Act.
In other words, we are not going to send you money, we are not going
to take your people and teach them how to fight and how to fight us
while you are voting against us and actually showing yourself to be a
threat to the very things that we hold dear.

{time} 2215

You want to be just a pain, you want to be a threat, that is your
business, but we are not going to pay you to do that. We are not going
to train your military people, we are not going to train your pilots,
you are just going to get cut off.
Now, I also want to point out that under this bill, if it were passed
and signed into law as is, it would not take effect until after the
March 31, 2006, report comes out from the U.N. By that, it would give
countries plenty of time to understand the consequences of their acts.
Just as I talked about in the prior bill, there are consequences to our
actions. There need to be. And people need to know what those
consequences are. So with this bill, we will give them plenty of time.
They are going to know every time they take a vote that it is going to
cost them. It is their choice, but we do not have to pay them to be
disruptive to what we believe in.
Colombia, for example, they get $574 million. They voted with us 10.6
percent of the time in the U.N. in this last year. Jordan, $559 million
we have sent to them. They are much more supportive than Colombia. They
voted with us 16 percent of the time in the last session. Sudan, $435
million. Actually closer to $346 million. They voted with us 13.3
percent of the time. We have Pakistan. They vote with us less than 10
percent of the time, and we have provided $400 million in aid, just in
financial assistance alone. Ethiopia, $354 million. They vote with us
13.8 percent of the time. Liberia. We give them $224 million, and 13.6
percent of the time they vote with us. Uganda, $182 million.
I mean, this really testifies to the generosity of the soul of
America. Generosity is one thing, and I am proud we live in a generous
Nation; but stupidity when coupled with generosity is not necessarily a
real asset. In fact, I was struck. The dean of one of the schools at
Yale, just a delightful, brilliant man, was telling about being in a
cab, I believe it was in Chicago, and the cab driver was a foreigner.
And they got to talking, and since this dean was not originally from
the United States they got to talking about the attributes of America
or the problems in America. And as they discussed America’s strengths
and weaknesses, the cab driver made this comment, and I love it, and I
hope that my fellow Members will remember this. It is a great
observation from someone from another country. He said, America is
particularly lacking in the singular vice of jealousy.
We are a generous country, but we are not a jealous country. Is that
not a great observation from someone who is not from this country? When
you really get to know the heart and soul of America, we are not a
jealous country. When we see another country do well, when we see
another country obtaining freedom and stretching their wings to fly,
this country rushes to their support. We applaud them. We help them
however we can. And it makes me so proud to be a part of a Nation that
is like that, a Nation that is particularly lacking in the singular
vice of jealousy. That is America.
Even so, though we are not a jealous Nation, we do not have to pay
people to hate us. We are paying people to do that very thing. Madam
Speaker, one of the things I ran on and one of the things that drove me
off the bench was that I got sick and tired of seeing case after case
where we were paying people to do what was bad for the country. On the
other hand, we were penalizing people for doing what was good for the
country.
A good example: the marriage penalty. I have heard people talk for so
long about we need to fix the marriage penalty. Well, you know what, it
is real easy. You want to fix the marriage penalties? Even under the
existing code, all you would have to do is say if you are married and
both are working, instead of having thousands of dollars in penalties
because you did the wonderful thing of becoming married, you can file
married jointly or you can file as two single individuals. And in that
case, hey, it is whichever one is better for you. Boom, there goes the
marriage penalty; it is not a problem any more. We do not have to keep
adjusting formulas, it is just fixed, and we no longer penalize people
for doing the right thing.
I have heard elderly couples talk before about they wish they could
get married. They always felt like it was living in sin to be living
together and not married, but they could not afford to get married
because the government would cut some of their Social Security if they
ended up coming together as husband and wife. Well, how tragic is that?
We are paying people to violate their own sense of morals, and this
country should not be about doing that. Likewise, we should not be
about paying countries to do what hurts us.
Going down the list a little more. Peru. We give Peru $180 million-
plus. They vote with us 25 percent of the time. We have Bolivia here,
$155 million-plus. They vote with us 23 percent of the time. And if
somebody is listening and I touch on one of your favorite countries, or
maybe your homeland, and you think, gee, I do not like the way he is
talking about my country, it is like Sergeant Friday used to say, “It
is just the facts, ma’am. Just the facts.”
We have Kenya. We give them $142 million. They vote with us 12.5
percent of the time. Serbia, Montenegro, $134 million. Now, they do
much better. They are with us, looks like 42.6 percent of the time.
Haiti. We have sent our troops, we have sent people to fight on their
behalf, we have given them money, $132 million most recently; and they
vote with us 18 percent of the time. They really appreciate all we have
done for them, obviously.
India, $128 million, 20 percent of the time. And this is just the
U.S. aid. This is just the direct aid. There are probably all other
kinds of other sources we would have to look into. This is just the
direct financial aid that my staff has been able to dig up. And I do
appreciate Mike and Ashley and Brian doing such hard work on this.
We have Indonesia, $125, right at $126 million. Boy, they appreciate
so much our generosity. They vote with us 8.3 percent of the time in
the U.N. We have Ukraine. I really think the world of Ukraine. These
are independent-minded people. When I was on an exchange program over
in Ukraine back in 1973, they struck me a lot like being Texans. They
are very independent-minded. They just had a can-do attitude. We can
make things happen. Ukraine, I am shocked to say, this great nation of
Ukraine, it voted with us 28.6 percent of the time and we gave them
$113 million.

Now, at this point I would like to point out there is an exception in
here

[[Page H2730]]

in this bill, because we know a country can have a change of regime.
And if they have a change of regime, and the new regime is friendly to
us, then we ought to be able to help them at that point. So there is a
provision here that says that if the Secretary of State determines that
since the beginning of the most recent session of the General Assembly
there has been a fundamental change in the leadership and the policies
of the government of a country to which the prohibition in section A
applies, and the Secretary believes that because of that change the
government of that country will no longer oppose the position of the
United States in the U.N., then the Secretary may exempt that country
from the prohibition that is in this act.
So that song Santana did, “You Have Got to Change Your Evil Ways,”
of course it talked about “Jean and Joan and who knows who,” but this
is talking about these countries. They have to change their evil ways.
And if they do, then we will start helping them again. We see a regime
change, the Secretary of State certifies that they are going to be on
our side now, we want to help them all we can. The fact is, we want to
help all these countries. All these countries should be great to help,
but as long as they are doing what they can to undermine all the good,
the truth, the liberty, the freedom, the things that we hold dear, as
long as they are trying to undermine those things, we should not be
paying the billions of dollars that we are to help them do that, to
undermine our great ideas of freedom and democracy.
I do not know if you can see, but, Madam Speaker, this is a two-page
list, fine print going down here of all the people we are giving money
to that vote with us less than 50 percent of the time. You have the
Philippines, $111 million, 13 percent of the time they vote with us.
Russia, $107 million we have given them. And some people think Russia
is the whole big former Soviet Union. Russia was one of 15 states. I
was intrigued when I was in the former Soviet Union back in 1973. Most
people in America knew so little about the Soviet Union. They knew all
about us, and that was most interesting. They knew we had 50 States;
they could talk about George Washington. You talk to Americans, they
did not know much of anything about the Soviet Union.
We also have South Africa. Most folks felt like South Africa was now
on our side. Freedom-loving people in America went to bat for South
Africa. It was so unfair with the disparity and the treatment between
the races. Under God’s plan, as the Declaration of Independence said,
under the Creator’s plan all people should be equal. They were created
that way, and by his grace should be that way. But, unfortunately, in
this world of sorrow, it requires people fighting and dying to secure
that right that God gave us. But here is South Africa. We give them
nearly $100 million. They vote with us 11.4 percent of the time.
Bangladesh. Of course, we remember how generous not just the American
Government was in times of suffering, of flood, our people poured out
their hearts, they poured out their finances. And Bangladesh, they vote
with us 8.6 percent of the time.
Angola, $91.75 million in aid we have given to Angola, and they vote
with us 17 percent of the time.
I realize if there is anybody left watching C-SPAN that they maybe
dozed off. I have been a very restful thing for them to have happen
tonight, and I am pleased I could do that. The trouble is, this is
serious stuff. This is our hard-earned tax dollars that are getting
poured down the drain, because some of these countries have shown their
contempt for freedom, for liberty, again for the things we hold dear.
They are taking our money and pouring it down the drain, and feeding
the egos of dictators and people that should not even be touching the
money. Our taxpayers deserve this money. It is their money, and they
should not have their money paid to countries that are going to stick
it in our face.
So, Madam Speaker, if you do not mind, I am just going to continue
down this list. We have Georgia, the great state of Georgia. I remember
when I was in Ukraine, somebody told me about the fellow walking along
the street in Georgia. And the Georgians like to use their hands all
the time when they talk. So this guy was walking along carrying a
watermelon, and a tourist came up to the Georgian, and this is in the
Asian Georgia, not our U.S. Georgia, but he came up to the fellow
carrying the watermelon and asked him, can you tell me how to get to
the town square?

{time} 2230

The Georgian said, “Will you hold my watermelon?”
The tourist said, “Sure.”
He gave the watermelon to the tourist and said, “I do not know.” He
takes his watermelon and goes on. They like to use their hands. They
have a great sense of humor. We have given them $90 million at least in
aid. They have done a little better. They voted with us 36.7 percent of
the time. Under this bill if it is passed, they will have to do a
little better. If they want to keep having us contribute, because it is
what it is. It is a contribution to a country that has nothing but
disdain for us.
I am not talking about the people. I admire the people in the former
Soviet Union, but you cannot admire or feed a government that does not
believe in freedom and only believes in taking the freedoms of its
people. Now Georgia has made great strides, but there is more to be
done. We do not have to contribute to a government that can not stand
us.
Zambia, we have given them huge amounts of aid, and 12.7 percent of
the time they vote with us.
Nigeria, $80 million, and they vote with us 14.9 percent of the time.
Armenia, $79 million, nearly $80 million just in direct foreign aid,
26.9 percent of the time they vote with us.
Mozambique, right at $80 million, and 10 percent of the time they
vote with us.
Tanzania, $77 million, 11.9 percent of the time they vote with us.
Eritrea, $72 million, 10.6 percent of the time is all they vote with
us.
Here is a shocker. Here is a real shocker. We hear so much talk about
our friends, our neighbors, that we should be supporting each other and
helping each other and I agree with that, we should be good neighbors;
but that neighbor thing is a two-sided thing when it comes to national
policy. I believe in the teachings of Jesus, the golden rule is
critical. We should be loving our neighbor, but I love my children. I
love my three daughters, Katy, Caroline and Sarah with all my heart.
But when they acted up, I was not going to reward that, I was not going
to give positive reinforcement to negative activity. That is just
ridiculous. Simply loving and caring about your neighbor does not
necessarily mean you contribute to their delinquency.
Here the shocker: We give in direct financial aid alone, no telling
how much else, Mexico, $76.8 million and they vote with us 23 percent
of the time in the United Nations. Unbelievable.
According to the most recent report from the U.N., 23 percent of the
time is all that Mexico sees fit to support our positions for freedom,
for liberty, to avoiding suppression, supporting human rights, 23
percent of the time. It is incredible, just amazing. And the thing is
many of us know many Mexican citizens. These are good people. They love
families.
I was recently near where a Hispanic family reunion was taking place
and it was under a big park pavilion, and I thought this is the way
America used to be, families came together for family reunions. I see
great hope for America with Hispanics in America with strong religious
convictions. These things bode well for America, but it does not matter
when you are looking at a country that votes against us so much. That
is not a very friendly thing to do.
The Congo, $71 million, they vote against us 27 percent of the time.
Here with Bosnia we have done so much. So many of our American
soldiers under the Clinton administration went over there to help out.
We are still giving them millions of dollars in financial aid. Bosnia,
they see fit to vote with us 42 percent of the time.
For the record, I have my laptop sitting here and I have not used it
for the entire time I have been speaking.
Ghana, $59 million and they voted with us 14.5 percent of the time.
Ecuador, $55 million, they voted with us 15.7 percent of the time.
Cambodia, $53 million, 11.8 percent of the time they vote with us.

[[Page H2731]]

Honduras, $50 million, they voted with us 23.9 percent of the time.
Turkey, we did such a favor for Turkey of eliminating such a threat
on their southern border, they would not allow us to utilize their
facilities to come in from the north. Our friends in Turkey, we still
give them millions of dollars in direct financial assistance, they vote
with us 34.8 percent of the time.
Guatemala, $50 million plus, they vote with us 23.9 percent of the
time.
Rwanda, $50 million plus, and they vote with us 11.3 percent of the
time.
Macedonia, $49.67 million, and they vote with us 42.4 percent of the
time.
Azerbaijan, $49 million plus, they vote with us 11.5 percent of the
time.
Here is an amazing statistic. With all of the sacrifices that we have
made, DPR of Korea, $45.7 million we are still giving in direct
financial aid, they vote with us 3.3 percent of the time. And we are
still giving them $45.7 million. This is DPR of Korea, but still, we
are giving them $45 million to vote with us 3 percent of the time.
Nepal, $45.31 million, they vote with us 12.7 percent of the time.
Nicaragua, $45 million and they vote with us 26 percent of the time.
El Salvador, $44 million, they vote with us 24.3 percent of the time.
Let me see. We have Mali, $43 million, and 14 percent of the time
they vote with us.
We do a little better with Bulgaria and Romania. We give them each
over $42 million, and they vote with us 44.1 percent of the time. They
can step that up if they want to continue, if we can get this bill
passed.
Kazakhstan, nearly $42 million, and they vote with us 10.9 percent of
the time.
Cyprus, we give them millions, and 40 percent of the time they vote
with us.
Uzbekistan, $38-plus million, and 12.5 percent of the time they vote
with us.
Lebanon, $36.7 million, and they vote with us 8.7 percent of the
time.
Madagascar, nearly $36 million, they vote with us 12.7 percent of the
time.
Poland, we have had such camaraderie with Poland. We were so proud of
their efforts, once again going back to what the foreign cab driver
said, never an ounce of jealousy. We were so proud of what they
accomplished, the way they threw off the shackles that bound them and
grabbed onto freedom. Poland, we are still contributing direct
financial aid, $35 million, basically, and 45.7 percent of the time
they vote with us.
Senegal, $44.3 million, and they vote with us 13.3 percent of the
time.
The Dominican Republic, we give them $34 million in direct aid, and
they vote with us 23.5 percent of the time.
Yemen, $33 million, and they vote with us 8.6 percent of the time.
Brazil, $28 million, they vote with us 14.9 percent of the time.
Republic of Moldova, $27.65 million, they vote with us 36.7 percent
of the time.
Namibia, right at $27 million, 15.1 percent of the time they vote
with us.
Burundi, $26 million, 9.8 percent of the time they vote with us.
Oman, $26 million we give them, and they vote with us 9.9 percent of
the time.
Sri Lanka, $26 million, they vote with us 12.9 percent of the time.
Croatia, $25.7 million in direct financial aid, they vote with us
42.6 percent of the time.
Skipping down, Jamaica, $24 million we give them in direct aid, 12.5
percent.
Some people go that is not that much, $24 million, $25 million, we
are talking about taxpayer after taxpayer, hard working hours, factory
workers, people working outside and earning a living by the sweat of
their brow. We are talking about so many of those type people having
their entire taxation going to a nation that cannot stand us and what
we stand for.
Vietnam, we are still giving them $22 million, and they vote with us
6 percent of the time.
Ireland. This was surprising to me, good friend, but they only vote
with us 42.1 percent of the time.
Cuba, apparently we are somehow giving $21.37 million to Cuba. They
vote with us 7.4 percent of the time.
Chad, $21 million, and they vote with us 22.7 percent of the time.
Morocco, right at $21 million, and they vote with us 11.4 percent of
the time.
Panama, $18 million, and they vote with us 23 percent of the time.
Zimbabwe, $15 million, and they vote with us 7.2 percent of the time.
Down to Mongolia, $14 million, they vote with us 14.5 percent of the
time.
The old Burma, we give $13 million and they vote with us 11.8 percent
of the time.
Paraguay, $12 million, they vote with us 24.7 percent of the time.
Tunisia, $12 million, and they vote with us 10 percent of the time.
Botswana, $11.66 million, and they vote with us 12.5 percent of the
time.
You know, I hold in my heart nothing but hope that these countries
will support the same ideals and the same abstract notions of love and
freedom and liberty and help for others that the United States does,
but I am telling Members, we do not need to pay them to be a thorn in
our side and disrupt the things that we hold so dear.

Armenia to host two major economic gatherings

Vardapetian Ophelia

Armenpress

ARMENIA TO HOST TWO MAJOR ECONOMIC GATHERINGS

YEREVAN, APRIL 28, ARMENPRESS: Yelena Nazinian, head of Baltic and CIS
department of Master Center, established to promote international economic
integration, told Armenpress the Center plans to organize Construction-2005
congress in Armenia’s resort town of Tsakhkadzor on June 17.
She said the three-day congress will discuss a wide range of questions
concerning production of building materials, application of new technologies
and other construction industry-related issues.
She also said some 15 Russian construction companies, which look at
Armenia as a perspective market, as well as companies from Germany, Finland
and Italy have confirmed their participation.
She also said officials of agriculture and economic development
ministries of 11 Russian provinces will arrive in Armenia to participate in
Cooperation-2005 conference in Yerevan slated for next September. The
conference will be held within the frameworks of the Year of Russia in
Armenia.

Minsk Group to interrogate Mamediarov in Frankfurt

Vardapetian Ophelia

AZG Armenian Daily #076, 28/04/2005

Karabakh issue

MINSK GROUP TO INTERROGATE MAMEDIAROV IN FRANKFURT

The OSCE Minsk group co-chairs were to meet the Azerbaijani foreign minister
within the framework of Prague Process in Frankfurt, April 27.

The Minsk group stated in London on April 15 that the next meeting of
Armenian and Azeri foreign ministers will take place on April 27. Russian
co-chair Yuri Merzlyakov told Azeri ANS TV on April 26 that “the co-chairs
will meet Armenia’s foreign minister somewhere in Europe after the Frankfurt
meeting”.

Hamlet Gasparian, Armenian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, told daily Azg
that there was no agreement of a meeting between Oskanian and the Minsk
group. Gasparian said that no place and date for that meeting was specified.

Deputy foreign minister of Azerbaijan, Araz Azimov, stated the day after
tomorrow that “recently Oskanian avoids meetings” and explained that
“official Yerevan is unable to find counterarguments to Azerbaijan’s
logical, objective and practical suggestions”.

By Tatoul Hakobian

ENOKIAN: Armenian Genocide victims are not forgotten

Vardapetian Ophelia

The Illinois Leader, IL
April 26 2005

ENOKIAN: Armenian Genocide victims are not forgotten

By Lee Enokian

OPINION – Today is the 90th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.
Between 1915 and 1923, more than 1.5 million Armenians were murdered
or forcibly exiled because they were the wrong religion and
ethnicity. The world community memorializes the anniversary annually
as Armenian Martyrs Day.

Thousands of Armenians were offered their lives in exchange for their
conversion to Islam. They refused and died as a result. Their
steadfast faithfulness to the Christian faith is not surprising.
Armenia was the first Christian nation and remains the only Christian
nation in the Middle East.

Various Turkish people invaded southwest Asia during the Middle Ages
and carved an empire for themselves from lands occupied by the
indigenous Semitic and Indo-European inhabitants.

Turkish nationalism grew relentlessly during the following centuries.
In the years preceding World War I, they actively sought to Turkify
the Ottoman Empire and strengthen their rule by eliminating fractious
ethnic minorities.

The western two-thirds of Anatolia was once inhabited by Greeks and
other Indo-European peoples. It is now primarily occupied by Turks.

The eastern third of modern Turkey was once Armenian with an Assyrian
minority, but is now populated by Turks and Kurds.

Modern Armenia survived only because it was the single province
controlled, and protected, by the Russian Empire. The rest of the
territory within its historical borders is almost wholly devoid of
ethnic Armenians.

The organized depopulation of Christians and non-Turks from Anatolia
by the Ottoman Empire is one of the worst incidents of racism and
religious intolerance documented in the world.

The Genocide was master-minded by the ultra-nationalist `Young Turk’
government of Ottoman Turkey. Mehmet Talaat Pasha was the Minister of
the Interior and architect of the Armenian Genocide. He was rewarded
by being elevated to the position of Grand Vizier in 1917. Pasha fled
to Germany as his empire collapsed in 1918. He was convicted of
capital crimes, including massacring the Armenians. The post-war
Ottoman government sentenced him to death in absentia.

Just-minded federal, state and local governments throughout the world
continue to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide.

Illinois is no different. Gov. Rod Blagojevich has continued the
practice of his predecessors by remembering the plight of the
Armenian people. Part of his annual proclamation reads: `The Armenian
community, as well as the global community, remembers the Armenian
Genocide, which occurred 90 years ago; and during this tragic
historical period between the years of 1915 and 1923, Armenians were
forced to witness the genocide of their loved ones, and the loss of
their ancestral homelands; and this extermination and forced
relocation of over 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Turks is
recognized every year.’

Sadly, the modern state of Turkey denies the Genocide ever occurred.
It restricts the ability of ethnic Armenians, Kurds and Assyrians to
enter and travel within the country. In fact, Turkey has done its
best to remove every trace of the Armenian people from their
ancestral homeland. These efforts still don’t change history.

Blagojevich concluded his proclamation with the fact that we must
remember hateful events like the Genocide to help prevent their
future institution.

`Both recognition and education concerning past atrocities such as
the Armenian Genocide is, crucial in the prevention of future crimes
against humanity.’

Evil wins when good men turn a blind eye.

ANKARA: Radical Shift in Turkey’s Armenian Policy

Vardapetian Ophelia

Journal of Turkish Weekly
April 26 2005

Radical Shift in Turkey’s Armenian Policy

The rigid Armenian approach and the Yerevan’s rejections to Turkish
dialogue offers cause radical change in Turkish Armenian policy,
Hurriyet reports.

Till now, Turkish governments have called the Armenian side to
establish a joint commission to discuss the historical disputes.
Ankara has argued that historians from both sides should discuss the
differences. However Turkish authorities shifted this `moderate
policy’ after the 24th April Demonstrations all over the world and
the Yerevan’s rigid rejections. After the Turkish Cabinet’s meeting
yesterday Turkish spokesman Cemil Cicek declared the radical change.
Cicek said `the time is to show the reality behind the lies’.

Cicek said that Turkey needs to follow a new policy. He added all
bodies of the Turkish state and Turkish society will do any effort,
will make a total struggle against the allegations.

Dr. Davut Sahiner from ISRO find the decision `understandable’:

`Turkey does not need Armenia or Armenian support in any area, while
Armenia needs to Turkey to survive and to develop. However the
picture is strange. Turkey calls Armenia for dialogue and for
co-operation, and the side in need rejects without any negotiations.
Armenia is an occupier country. 20 percent of Azerbaijani territories
have been Armenian occupation and the EU and OSCE named Armenia
`occupier’ and `aggressive state’. Armenia does not recognize Turkish
borders. Armenian diaspora always Turkish interests outside and makes
anything possible to harm Turkish policies in the EU or in the US.
The Armenian terrorists killed more than 40 innocent Turkish
diplomats, and Armenians call all Armenian terrorists murdered the
diplomats `hero’. They reject any Turkish, American or European offer
to dialogue with the Turkish side. They reject the withdrawal calls
from the EU and the US. So, Ankara can do nothing to normalize
relations with Armenia. It is understood that Armenia is happy with
the status quo. Armenians like to live in the past. We hope Armenian
diaspora will help Armenia to overcome all economic and political
problems as they did in the past (!). Kocharian accuse Turkey and
Turkish people for the current problems in Armenia. So he will
continue to accuse, but will do nothing more’.

JTW

Il y a 90 ans – Le premier genocide du siecle

Vardapetian Ophelia

Le Devoir
23 Avril, 2005

Il y a 90 ans – Le premier génocide du siècle

Avant les Juifs et les Tutsis, les Arméniens furent victimes du
premier génocide moderne

Christian Rioux
Édition du samedi 23 et du dimanche 24 avril 2005

Derrière son sourire, la grand-mère de Claire Mouradian cachait des
cicatrices profondes. Outre la blessure morale, indélébile, son corps
portait des traces de coups de couteau dans les flancs, de lobes
d’oreille arrachés et de quelques balles perdues. En 1915, elle
échappa miraculeusement au massacre. Chez elle, à Diyarbakir, sur les
bords du Tigre, on assassinait à la sortie de la ville, loin des yeux
indiscrets. Elle s’en est tirée, cachée sous un tas de corps. Des
Kurdes, probablement pilleurs de cadavres, l’ont récupérée. Il lui
faudra encore échapper à une famille qui la destinait à un mariage,
gagner Alep où elle rencontra son futur époux et passer par la
Cilicie, l’éphémère Arménie indépendante et la Grèce. En route pour
les États-Unis, elle fit escale en France, d’où elle n’est jamais
repartie.

Embattled Belarus leader visits ally Russia

Vardapetian Ophelia

Embattled Belarus leader visits ally Russia

By Oleg Shchedrov

MOSCOW, April 22 (Reuters) – The embattled president of Belarus on
Friday took a respite from Western calls for change in his ex-Soviet
republic to discuss plans for a joint state with his only ally,
Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Alexander Lukashenko flew to Moscow a day after European Union foreign
policy chief Javier Solana joined U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice in criticising his tough rule and telling him it was time he
went.

“I have no opinion about Rice or about her statements,” Lukashenko
said on arrival in Moscow. “At least she now knows where Belarus is.”

Rice described Belarus — which lies to the west of Russia and has
borders with three new EU members — as “the last true dictatorship in
the centre of Europe.” In comments on Thursday, Solana echoed: “There
is no doubt the time has come for change.”

Lukashenko, who has ruled the Slavic country of 5 million people since
1994, has rooted out the legal opposition and sent to jail some of its
prominent figures.

A pariah for the West, Belarus is a key ally for Russia.

Although the efforts of both leaders in the late 1990s to form a
common state have stumbled on disagreement over administrative and
financial issues, the plan has not been formally dropped and the
leaders regularly meet to discuss cooperation.

“You are welcome here,” Putin told Lukashenko at the start of
one-to-one Kremlin talks before a meeting on cooperation.

WAVE OF POLITICAL CHANGE

Lukashenko’s importance for Moscow grew after a wave of political
changes in ex-Soviet states left Belarus and Armenia Russia’s only
European allies.

Ukraine and Georgia have installed pro-Western governments in peaceful
“velvet revolutions.” Moldova, run by Communist president, has
proclaimed a similar change of orientation.

The United States and European Union have made clear Belarus could be
next in line for change.

Earlier this month Putin and Lukashenko met on the Black Sea coast and
Russian media said they discussed ways of resisting the spread of
“velvet revolutions” to other ex-Soviet states.

Analysts say the big question for Lukashenko is how strong Putin will
defend him if protests erupt in Belarus.

Putin, annoyed by what he sees as Western interference in Russia’s
zone of interests, discussed the situation in the former Soviet
republics with Rice on Wednesday during her visit to Moscow. But there
has been no indication what the outcome of their talks was.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told a NATO meeting in the
Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, on Thursday that Russia was opposed to
any foreign support for “velvet revolutions.”

“I think the democratic process and the process of reform cannot be
imposed from outside,” he said.

However, Russia’s reluctance to put at risk relations with the West by
defending its clients in Ukraine during its “orange revolution” last
year, could be an alarming sign for Lukashenko.

Andrei Cherkizov, a commentator for Ekho Moskvy radio, said Putin
would make a decision driven by his own interests.

“A survival instinct will be the only factor which will decide Putin’s
behaviour,” he said.

04/23/05 03:00 ET