White Fishing Forbidden

WHITE FISHING FORBIDDEN

Panorama.am
16:29 03/04/2008

This year again the hunting of the white fish is forbidden as there
remained little reserves of it in the lakes of Armenia. The Ministry
of Environmental Affairs does not authorize the hunting of white fish
in the Lake Sevan since last year, said Karen Tchenteredjyan of the
ministry of environmental affairs.

According to him the data registered last year showed that the amount
of white fish in Sevan is 600 tones, whereas this figure two years
ago was 1000 tones.

The ministry strengthens its supervision on the illegal fishing
and plans to extend the number and types of fishes. He said that
an investigation will be carried and if it becomes obvious that the
fishing is allowed in the fish industry and that it will not harm to
the decrease of that particular type of fish then the fishers will
be given authorizations.

OSCE, CoE: amendments to Armenia assembly law raise serious concerns

OSCE, Council of Europe: amendments to Armenia’s assembly law raise
serious concerns

STRASBOURG/WARSAW, 02.04.2008 – In a joint legal opinion, the Council of
Europe’s Venice Commission and the OSCE’s Office for Democratic
Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) concluded that recent amendments
to Armenia’s assembly law raise serious concerns.

The amendments to the Law of the Republic of Armenia on Conducting
Meetings, Assemblies, Rallies and Demonstrations
< 2008/CDL(2008)036-e.asp> , passed on 17
March 2008, were reviewed by the ODIHR’s Expert Panel on Freedom of
Assembly and the Venice Commission following a request from the Speaker
of the Armenian Parliament.

"On the basis of a preliminary assessment, the Venice Commission and the
OSCE/ODIHR Expert Panel on Freedom of Assembly do not consider the
proposed amendments to be acceptable, to the extent that they restrict
further the right of assembly in a significant fashion", says the joint
opinion.

The amendments tighten provisions concerning spontaneous assemblies, and
limit the possibility for decisions on restricting assemblies deemed to
pose a risk for public order to be reviewed by an independent tribunal
or court. In addition, a provision allowing for small events to develop
spontaneously into bigger assemblies – which was considered a good
practice example and made the Law in its previous form stand out as
progressive – has been repealed.

The joint opinion of the Venice Commission and the OSCE/ODIHR
< /CDL(2008)037-e.asp> was shared
with the National Assembly on 28 March 2008, and will be discussed with
National Assembly representatives in Yerevan on 15-16 April 2008.

The joint opinion continues the long-standing cooperation between the
Armenian authorities, the ODIHR and the Venice Commission on the
legislative regulation of public assemblies.

OSCE, Conseil de l’Europe : les amendements à la loi arménienne sur
les rassemblements posent des problèmes sérieux

STRASBOURG/VARSOVIE, 02.04.2008 – Dans un avis juridique conjoint, la
Commission de Venise du Conseil de l’Europe et le Bureau des
Institutions Démocratiques et des Droits de l’Homme (BIDDH) de l’OSCE
ont conclu que les amendements récents à la loi arménienne sur les
rassemblements posent des problèmes sérieux.

Les amendements à la loi de la République d’Arménie sur
l’organisation de réunions, de rassemblements, de manifestations et de
démonstrations
< nt/docs/2008/CDL(2008)036-e.asp> , adoptés le
17 mars 2008, ont été examinés par le Comité d’Experts en
matière de liberté de réunion de l’OSCE/BIDDH et par la
Commission de Venise à la demande du Président du parlement
arménien.

"Sur la base d’une première analyse, la Commission de Venise et le
Comité d’Experts en matière de liberté de réunion du BIDDH ne
considèrent pas ces amendements comme étant acceptables, dans la
mesure où ils limitent davantage, de manière substantielle, le droit
de manifester", dit l’avis conjoint.

Les amendements réduisent la possibilité de tenir des rassemblements
spontanés, ainsi que la possibilité d’avoir recours à un tribunal
ou une cour indépendants contre les décisions interdisant les
rassemblements considérés comme posant des problèmes d’ordre
public. De plus, une disposition permettant à des petits
rassemblements de se transformer spontanément en des manifestations
plus grandes – qui avait été considérée comme étant un exemple
de bonne pratique et rendait la Loi dans sa version précedente
progressive – a été abrogée.

L’avis conjoint de la Commission de Venise et de l’OSCE/ODIHR
< 08/CDL(2008)037-e.asp> a été
transmis à l’Assemblée nationale de la République d’Arménie le
28 mars 2008 et sera discuté à Erevan avec des représentants de
l’Assemblée Nationale arménienne les 15-16 avril 2008.

Cet avis conjoint s’inscrit dans la coopération de longue date entre
les autorités de la République d’Arménie, la Commission de Venise
et l’OSCE/ODIHR en matière de législation sur les rassemblements
publics.

ED057b08

http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/
http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2008
http://www.venice.coe.i
http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/20

People Want To Know The Answer To "Why-s"

PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW THE ANSWER TO "WHYs"

A1+
27 March, 2008

"The fault of the recent events rather lies with the authorities than
with the police as the police executed the authorities’ orders,"
Yerevan citizen Hrachuhy Mesropian said to A1+ when the latter was
conducting polls in the capital streets to know public opinion about
the country’s political scene.

Hrachuhy Mesropian rules out any dialogue between the conflicting
sides as "one cannot conclude an agreement with those who have taken
arms against peaceful people."

Bagrat Dalalian thinks that the situation is stable in the country as
"no weapon was used against demonstrators and there was no breach
of law."

Some respondents note that our enemies, namely Azerbaijan, try to
benefit from the current state in Armenia and attack the country. "The
authorities must realize their plans and take measures.

The authorities violate human rights by detaining the participants of
"political walks." Citizens do not exercise their right to walk freely
in their country," says Lyova Hakobian.

Hakob Shamlian believes that everything will change in Armenia and
people will live in a country they have longed for. "I exclude a
dialogue with the authorities who take arms against champions of
liberty."

Angela Mamikonian thinks there will be more clashes if the sides
don’t compromise.

Others say people went outdoors to restore their rights and freedom.

"Our people want to know the answer to many questions.

Only in case they achieve their goal they will leave in peace and
safety," Aram Khalatian concluded.

BAKU: Armenian Armed Forces Conducted Military Training In Aghdam Re

ARMENIAN ARMED FORCES CONDUCTED MILITARY TRAINING IN AGHDAM REGION, AZERBAIJAN

Azeri Press Agency
March 26 2008
Azerbaijan

Aghdam. Teymur Guliyev-APA. The divisions of Armenian armed forces
have today conducted military training in occupied Uzundere territory
of Aghdam Region of Azerbaijan.

APA Karabakh bureau reports that training has lasted for an hour.

Heavy artillery used by Armenian armed forces is felt in the villages
nearby. The villagers noted their houses had been damaged as a result
of the training.

Opp complains of cont harassment following end of state of emergency

Institute for War & Peace Reporting
Armenia: Arrests Continue
Opposition complains of continued harassment following end of state of
emergency.
By Gegham Vardanian in Yerevan (CRS No. 437 26-Mar-08)

Despite the lifting of the state of emergency in the Armenian capital
Yerevan, the country’s opposition says dozens of its activists remain in
custody, with a greater number facing criminal charges.

Among 135 people in detention are two members of parliament, Myasnik
Malkhasian and Hakob Hakobian, and former foreign minister Aleksandr
Arzumanian.

Former prime minister Aram Sarkisian, the head of the opposition Republic
Party, was accused on March 25 of organising unauthorised demonstrations and
attempting to seize power. He is not in custody but is not being allowed to
leave the country.

On March 26, Arshak Banuchian, the deputy director of Armenia’s ancient
manuscripts institute, the Matenadaran, and a former colleague of
ex-president and opposition leader Levon Ter-Petrosian, was detained on
charges of disturbing public order.

Most of the charges against opposition leaders relate to the violence in
Yerevan on March 1, in which at least eight people died. While the
opposition accuses the government of violently suppressing peaceful
protests, the authorities say they were acting to stop an attempted seizure
of power.

Thomas Hammarberg, human rights commissioner for the Council of Europe, has
recommended that `a comprehensive inquiry be established into the events of
1 March’ and that the enquiry be `independent, impartial, transparent and
perceived as credible by the whole population’.

Media restrictions have now been lifted in Yerevan, but the city is still
tense and Freedom Square around the city’s opera-house, the meeting place of
the opposition, is often ringed with police, especially in the evenings.

At a March 20 press conference, outgoing president Robert Kocharian said the
state of emergency imposed on March 1 after the violence had served a useful
purpose. "Immediately after it was introduced, the situation calmed down, an
opportunity was created for consolidating that stabilisation process with
concrete actions," he said.

Opposition activists have been treated with varying degrees of harshness.
Many have been detained and then released without charge. Others have been
questioned, charged and released. Ter-Petrosian is still under de facto
house arrest with visitors to his house being checked and his government
guards not allowing him to go out `on grounds of security’.

One of those detained on March 1 and later released was Armen Ohanian, who
worked as a representative for Ter-Petrosian during the elections, and who
helped lead the subsequent street protests.

`I was walking down Abovian Street [in central Yerevan] with two colleagues
when we were stopped by two law-enforcement officials and told to follow
them,’ he told IWPR. `We did not resist and they didn’t say on what grounds
they were stopping us and where they were taking us.’

The three men were handcuffed and taken to a police station. Ohanian said
that on the way, the policemen mocked his glasses and called him `Shurik’ in
reference to a bespectacled hero of Soviet cinema comedy.

In the police station, Ohanian’s demand for a lawyer was refused and he was
not allowed to make any telephone calls. He was informed that he had been
detained for `resisting the police’.

`One of the bosses called Abrahamian said that in the record of my detention
it was written that I had hit the policemen,’ he said. `The policeman who
arrested me said that he could not write that as he did not want to be in a
stupid position in court and give false testimony.’

Ohanian said that the policemen treated him normally when their boss was not
in the room but when he wasn’t there they mocked him and promised to beat
him. He spent the night sleeping on chairs in the police station. He was
taken to the prosecutor’s office on March 2 and then released.

Ohanian lodged a written complaint with Armenia’s human rights ombudsman
Armen Harutiunian.

Harutiunian’s press secretary Grigor Grigorian said that he received more
than a dozen complaints about illegal actions and beatings by the police
since March 1. `Some of them have been confirmed and some haven’t,’ said
Grigorian.

Detainees have complained both to representatives of the ombudsman and to
Hammarberg that they were beaten during their arrests and while in
detention.

`Physical harm has been recorded with 12 of the accused and expert reports
have been commissioned to explain the reason for this,’ said Sona Truzian,
press secretary of the prosecutor general.

`Violation of the rights of detainees is happening everywhere,’ said Mikael
Danielian, human rights activist and head of Armenia’s Helsinki Association.
`They are invited orally to come to the police station for a conversation
but this conversation can last three hours or 20 days.’

Danielian said that detainees from the provinces had suffered especially
badly from police abuse.

`In our cell was a boy from Hrazdan who they beat up,’ said detainee Armen
Ohanian. `They beat him up again in my presence when he tried to answer back
to a policeman who insulted him. One of them held him and the other beat
him.’

Ohanian said that many detainees were taken home by friends or relatives
without any evidence being left that they had been arrested in the first
place.

A young man named Sedrak (not his real name) was arrested along with five of
his friends on the morning of March 2, the day after the street clashes in
Yerevan. They had taken part in the opposition demonstration outside the
French embassy. They were held for the entire day in a police station.

`Our parents paid the police 100,000 drams (330 US dollars) for each of us
for us to be released,’ said Sedrak.

Outside Yerevan, opposition supporters also claim harassment.

On March 11, Armen Hovannisian, an official in the administration in Armenia’s
northern Lori region, was sacked from his job because he had taken part in
rallies in support of Ter-Petrosian.

In the written explanation for Hovannisian’s dismissal, his boss, Ashot
Manukian, wrote that it was because of `violations of the principle of
political balance by a civil servant’.

Hovannisian said that he is one of the founders of Ter-Petrosian’s Armenian
National Movement party which used to govern Armenia and campaigned on
behalf of the former president. He says that he deliberately took leave
during and after the election campaign in order to engage in political
activity.

Asked why Hovannisian was not allowed to campaign for the opposition, when
the majority of the Lori administration were members of the pro-government
Republican Party, and took part in rallies in support of official
presidential candidate Serzh Sarkisian, Manukian replied, `But this is the
governing party and it represents the authorities, that is natural.’

In Yerevan, ordinary opposition supporters say they are still suffering
harassment on the street, despite the lifting of the state of emergency.

Street demonstrations are still banned, so instead opposition activists have
taken to staging `walks’ through the streets of Yerevan holding portraits of
detainees. The police in their turn have started detaining participants in
these events. Senior Yerevan police official Valery Osipian said that two
men detained on March 24 had been `breaching public order’.

Gegham Vardanyan is a journalist with Internews in Yerevan. Naira
Bulghadarian in Vanadzor contributed to this article.

Contract Signed Between MCA-Armenia And "Hayjrnakhagits Institute" C

CONTRACT SIGNED BETWEEN MCA-ARMENIA AND "HAYJRNAKHAGITS INSTITUTE" CJSC

armradio.am
25.03.2008 17:23

Millennium Challenge Account – Armenia SNCO announced the award of a
consulting contract to "Hayjrnakhagits Institute" CJSC for the design
and construction supervision of 4 gravity irrigation systems as part of
the MCA-Armenia Irrigated Agriculture Project Infrastructure activity.

The contract was signed by MCA-Armenia CEO Ara Hovsepyan and the
director of "Hayjrnakhagits Institute" CJSC Yuri Javadyan.

This contract will focus on the feasibility analysis, preparation of
final designs and technical supervision of works for constructing
four gravity irrigation systems and effectively replacing up to
22 deteriorated and inefficient Soviet-era pumping stations. The
construction of four gravity irrigation systems will provide a stable
water supply to approximately 3000 hectares of farmland in 16 rural
communities throughout Syunik marz. The four gravity schemes are:
Meghri, Tsav-Shikahogh, Spandaryan and Norashenik (Syunik marz).

The contract value is USD 390,000, spanning a period of 39-months.

President Kocharian Decrees Military Call Up

PRESIDENT KOCHARIAN DECREES MILITARY CALL UP

ARMENPRESS
March 25, 2008

YEREVAN, MARCH 25, ARMENPRESS; Armenia’s president Robert Kocharian
signed a decree on March 20, 2008 on mandatory spring military call-
up and demobilization.

Kocharian"s press office said under the decree, during April-June 2008
all those male citizens who turn 18 before the draft day as well as
those who will no longer be eligible to deferment will be called up
for mandatory military and alternative service.

During April-June 2008 those servicemen who complete their compulsory
military service, will be released.

Forcibly Re-Secularizing Turkey Will Only Backfire

FORCIBLY RE-SECULARIZING TURKEY WILL ONLY BACKFIRE
By Alfred Stepan

The Daily Star
March 22 2008
Lebanon

The chief prosecutor of Turkey’s High Court of Appeals recently
recommended to the country’s Constitutional Court that the ruling
Justice and Development Party (AKP) be permanently banned. Only last
July, the AKP was overwhelmingly re-elected in free and fair elections
to lead the government. The chief prosecutor also formally recommended
that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President Abdullah Gul, and
69 other leading politicians be banned from politics for five years.

Clearly, banning the AKP would trigger a political crisis that
would end Turkey’s efforts to join the European Union in the
foreseeable future and threaten its recent strong economic
growthTrillion-Dollar-Experiment . So the chief prosecutor’s
threat should not be taken lightly – all the more so given that the
Constitutional Court has banned 18 political parties since the current
constitution was introduced in 1982. Indeed, the recent call to ban the
AKP is directly related to its efforts to change Turkey’s constitution.

The underlying charge in the chief prosecutor’s indictment is that
the AKP has been eroding secularism. But the origins of the current
constitution, and its definition of secularism, are highly suspect.

Turkey’s existing constitution was adopted in 1982 as a direct product
of the Turkish military coup of 1980. The five senior generals who
led the coup appointed, directly or indirectly, all 160 members of
the Consultative Assembly that drafted the new constitution, and they
retained veto power over the final document.

In the national ratification referendum that followed, citizens were
allowed to vote against the military-sponsored draft, but not to
argue against it publicly.

As a result, the 1982 constitution has weaker democratic origins than
any in the EU. Its democratic content was also much weaker, assigning,
for example, enormous power (and a military majority) to the National
Security Council. While the AKP has moderated this authoritarian
feature, it is difficult to democratize such a constitution fully,
and official EU reports on Turkey’s prospects for accession repeatedly
call for a new constitution, not merely an amended one.

With public opinion polls indicating that the AKP’s draft constitution,
prepared by an academic committee, would be accepted through normal
democratic procedures, the chief prosecutor acted to uphold the type of
secularism enshrined in the 1982 constitution, which many commentators
liken to French secularism. Yet the comparison with what the French
call laicitŽ is misleading.

Certainly, both French laicitŽ and Turkish secularism (established
by modern Turkey’s founder, Mustapha Kemal Ataturk) began with a
similar hostility toward religion. But now they are quite different.

In Turkey, the only religious education that is tolerated is under
the strict control of the state, whereas in France a wide variety of
privately supported religious education establishments is allowed,
and since 1959 the state has paid for much of the Catholic Church’s
primary school costs. In Turkey, Friday prayers are written by civil
servants in the 70,000-member State Directorate of Religious Affairs,
and all Turkish imams also must be civil servants. No similar controls
exist in France.

Similarly, until the AKP came to power and began to loosen
restrictions, it was virtually impossible in Turkey to create a new
church or synagogue, or to create a Jewish or Christian foundation.

This may be why the Armenian patriarch urged ethnic Armenians in
Turkey to vote for the AKP in last July’s elections. Here, too,
no such restrictions exist in France.

The differences between French and Turkish secularism can be put in
even sharper comparative perspective. In the widely cited "Fox" index
measuring state control of majority and minority religions – in which
zero represents the least state control, and figures in the thirties
represent the greatest degree of control – all but two current EU
member states get scores that are in the zero to six range. France
is at the high end of the EU norm, with a score of six. Turkey,
however, scores 24, worse even than Tunisia’s authoritarian secular
regime. Is this the type of secularism that needs to be perpetuated
by the Turkish chief prosecutor’s not so-soft constitutional coup?

What really worries some democratic secularists in Turkey and
elsewhere is that the AKP’s efforts at constitutional reform might
be simply a first step toward introducing Islamic law, or sharia. If
the constitutional court will not stop a potential AKP-led imposition
of sharia, who will?

There are two responses to this question. First, the AKP insists that
it opposes creating a sharia state, and experts say that there is no
"smoking gun" in the chief prosecutor’s indictment showing that the
AKP has moved toward such a goal. Second, support for sharia, never
high in Turkey, has actually declined since the AKP came to power,
from 19 percent in 1996 to 8 percent in 2007.

Given that the AKP’s true power base is its support in democratic
elections, any attempt to impose sharia would risk alienating many of
its own voters. Given this constraint, there is no reason for anyone,
except for "secular fundamentalists," to support banning the AKP,
Erdogan, or Gul; and every reason for Turkey to continue on its
democratic path. Only that course will enable Turkey to construct a
better constitution than it has now.

Alfred Stepan is a professor of government and director of the Center
for Democracy, Toleration and Religion at Columbia University in
New York. THE DAILY STAR publishes this commentary in collaboration
Project Syndicate (c) ().

–Boundary_(ID_Adifk YK1DvbEIb8v8OQc2w)–

www.project-syndicate.org

Armenia Emergency Lifted, But Protests Continue

ARMENIA EMERGENCY LIFTED, BUT PROTESTS CONTINUE

Reuters
March 21 2008
UK

YEREVAN, March 21 (Reuters) – A state of emergency introduced in
Armenia following post-election clashes that left eight people dead
was lifted on Friday.

Troops left the streets of the capital Yerevan that they had occupied
since the March 1 clampdown, but they were replaced by a heavy
police presence that blocked around 1,500 protesters assembling in
the city centre.

Carrying candles and pictures of those who died, the protesters
instead walked through the city’s main streets in a vigil they
said was to remember the victims of the violent clashes, a Reuters
eyewitness reported.

Addressing the crowd, a police officer urged the protesters to
disperse: "We are all Armenians, please go home."

The country’s outgoing president, Robert Kocharyan, declared the
20-day state of emergency on March 1 after the street battles in
Yerevan between police and opposition protesters, who were demanding
the annulment of a presidential election.

Kocharyan is to step down next month when his long-time ally and
prime minister, Serzh Sarksyan, takes over as president.

Sarksyan defeated opposition candidate and former President Levon
Ter-Petrosyan in the Feb. 19 election.

The country moved towards a political resolution on Friday when
four political parties signed an agreement establishing a coalition,
which included one of the parties that had previously participated
in opposition protests.

But Ter-Petrosyan continues to insist the election was rigged and
blames police brutality for the violence that also left about 200
people injured. (Reporting by Hasmik Lazarian, writing by Conor
Sweeney)