Signatures and ratifications at the Council of Europe – 6/27 – 7/1

Signatures and ratifications at the Council of Europe
Week from 27 June to 1 July 2005
Additional information

Please note the addition to the previous announcement (press release
n° 366) :

1 July 2005

Lithuania ratified :
– the Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the
Convention (CETS No. 194)*

Week from 4 to 8 July 2005

7 July 2005

Armenia signed :
– the European Convention on the Promotion of a Transnational Long-Term
Voluntary Service for Young People (CETS No. 175)*

8 July 2005

Canada signed :
– the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning
the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed
through computer systems (CETS No. 189)*

* * *

Detailed information on the Council of Europe treaties (full text, chart
of signatures and ratifications, reservations and declarations, summary,
explanatory report) is available on the Treaty Office’s web site

—————
(*) CETS : Council of Europe Treaty Series

Press Release
Council of Europe Press Division
Ref: 392a05
Tel: +33 (0)3 88 41 25 60
Fax:+33 (0)3 88 41 39 11
[email protected]
internet: 08.07.2005

To receive our press releases by e-mail, contact :
[email protected]

A political organisation set up in 1949, the Council of Europe works to
promote democracy and human rights continent-wide. It also develops
common responses to social, cultural and legal challenges in its 46
member states.

http://conventions.coe.int
www.coe.int/press

TBILISI: South Caucasus gets armed

The Messenger, Georgia
July 7 2005

South Caucasus gets armed

All three South Caucasus countries have been spending large sums of
money on armaments recently, leading to concerns among regional
analysts that armed hostilities could renew between Azerbaijan and
Armenia.

In Azerbaijan, President Ilham Aliev has overseen a vast increase in
funds allotted to defense – from USD 135 million in 2003 to USD 175
million in 2004 to USD 300 million in 2005. A number of Azeri
politicians including government members have stated that if the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is not resolved soon, they do not rule out
the use of force. Furthermore, Azerbaijan is threatened by the fact
that military material and personnel from the Russian base
Akhalkalaki is headed to the Gyumri base in Armenia. Yerevan itself
has embarked on its own acquisition program, recently purchasing 10
combat jets Su-25 from Slovakia.

For years the Georgian government neglected its own army and the
result was obvious: poorly dressed, poorly armed soldiers, who did
not have basic conditions to train or even stay healthy.
Post-revolution President Mikheil Saakashvili then touted the army as
a leading priority for the country and launched major reforms.

Military reforms are crucially important for the country’s ambitions
to integrate into NATO. However Georgia media reports some observers
in NATO believe Georgia had gone overboard in its procurement
efforts. The newspaper 24 Saati quotes ambassador of Estonia to NATO
Harry Tiido as complaining: “There does not exist a normal program
for weapons buying that considers its appropriate use in the future.
Thus without this, as a result of maintenance current expenses will
grow.”

On the far side of the Caspian, Turkmenistan is reinforcing its own
military, a fact that also troubles Azerbaijan since the two
countries have conflicting views over the division of the Caspian
Sea. The newspaper Kviris Palitra reports that Ukraine recently
announced its willing to provide military assistance in exchange for
natural gas from Turkmenistan. Georgia too provides military material
for Turkmenistan, refurbishing aircraft from the Turkmen airforce in
exchange for debt relief.

To the north there is also concern of increased arms. On Wednesday
Russian Minister of Defense Sergei Ivanov reaffirmed at a press
conference in Nalchik that two extra mountain rifle brigades would be
deployed in the North Caucasus following the withdrawal of Russian
military bases from Georgia. One would be deployed in
Karachai-Cherkessia and the other in Dagestan near the
Georgian-Russian border, he said, stressing that they would be well
equipped and staffed by contracted soldiers. Their mission, he said,
would be to liquidate any terrorists on the Georgian-Russian border.

Ivanov is visiting the region as part of an inspection tour, a tour
that a columnist for RosBusinessConsulting described on Tuesday as
designed to “check up on the battle readiness of troops deployed in
the region.”

The news agency says its analysts have seen a “very strange
situation” developing in the North Caucasus. “The federal leadership
is preparing for large-scale military action in the Russian Caucasus.
At the same time, Moscow is not trying to deal with underlying issues
in the Caucasus through peaceful means. To the contrary, one gets the
impression that the federal leaders are purposely trying to provoke
new inter-ethnic conflicts in the region, playing a complicated game
with Western special services,” the columnist says.

Increased support for the military is obvious in Georgia today and a
welcomed change from previous years when weapons, soldiers and
discipline hit rock bottom. There are also immense risks involved
when a pattern of increased military forces is witnessed throughout
the region. It is at this point that regional cooperation and
diplomacy becomes all the more necessary.

Grand Council of the Canton of Vaud Formally Recognizes The Genocide

PRESS RELEASE
Switzerland-Armenia Association
Contact: Sarkis Shahinian <[email protected]>
Case postale 497
3000 Berne 14
CCP 87-481645-0
eMail: [email protected]

The Grand Council of the Canton of Vaud
Formally Recognizes the Armenian Genocide
Report of the Switzerland-Armenia Association (SAA)

Lausanne, Palais de Rumine, 5 July 2005

In the same room in which the Treaty of Lausanne was signed, after a
dignified debate, the Grand Council (legislative bodies) of the Canton
of Vaud rejected this morning a report of the State Council (executive
body) – written under the supervision of the Federal Council (Swiss
government), published on January 12, 2005 – refusing to characterize
the massacres of the Armenians in 1915 as Genocide. This report has
been issued by the State Council as an answer to the postulate Sandri,
adopted in 2003 by the Grand Council, which was demanding the
recognition of the Armenian genocide by the State Council.

While not wanting to condemn either the Turkish people or the current
government, yet maintaining the importance of honoring the Armenian
people, the Grand Council followed the recommendations of the
commission charged with examining the original report, and adopted a
formal resolution recognizing the Armenian Genocide.

Before voting, the final brief intervention of Cantonal Minister
Jean-Claude Mermoud, director of DIRE (Institutions and External
Relations Department) no longer evoked the main arguments of the
report: the absence of intention of the crime committed by the Young
Turks against the Armenians at the turn of the last century and the
points aimed at diminishing the importance of the worldwide recognition
of the Armenian genocide. The document, which was rife with
imprecisions and omissions – more than simple misjudgment – reflected
the desire not to displease the Swiss Foreign Ministry and the Seco
(State Secreteriat for Economy), given the obvious fact that a topic
close to the highly sensitive nerves of an economic partner (Turkey)
was being touched. Minister Mermoud said that the only difference with
the commission was in “how” to accomplish the task of remembrance and
that he would not place any obstacles in the work of the Swiss Foreign
Ministry.

Fortunately, the representatives – of all political backgrounds –
recognized the erroneous arguments of this report and rejected it with
overwhelming majority (with 85 votes in favor, 51 against, and 12
abstentions). Moreover, they reiterated the task of remembrance assumed
following the adoption of the Sandri postulate, on 23 September 2003,
which resulted in the cancellation of Foreign Minister Calmy-Rey’s
visit to Turkey ten days later.

In the very place where the great European powers and Turkey sanctioned
in 1923 the termination of the political rights of the Armenians, the
Grand Councilors today reaffirmed not only the appropriateness, but
also the responsibility of political bodies to characterize as genocide
this crime against humanity in adopting by an overwhelming majority (86
votes in favor, 35 against, and 25 abstentions) the following
resolution:

« The Grand Council of the Canton of Vaud recognizes the Genocide of
the Armenian people of 1915 and honors the memory of its victims. »

For more information, would you please consult the Website

**********************************************************************
IN FRENCH
******************************************* ***************************

Le Grand Conseil vaudois
reconnaît formellement le génocide des Arméniens
Compte rendu de l’Association Suisse-Arménie (ASA)

Lausanne, Palais de Rumine, le 5 juillet 2005

Dans la salle même où avait été signé en 1923 le Traité de Lausanne
qui voulait clore la question arménienne, et suite à un débat qui
s’est distingué par la dignité de ses propos, le législatif vaudois a
ce matin reconnu formellement le génocide des Arméniens. Il a pour
cela rejeté un rapport, rédigé en collaboration avec le Conseil
fédéral, dans lequel le Conseil d’État refusait de caractériser comme
génocide les crimes commis en 1915 contre les Arméniens. Ce rapport
faisait réponse au Postulat Sandri adopté en 2003.

Tout en soulignant ne pas vouloir condamner ni la population turque ni
le gouvernement actuel, mais bien désirer honorer le peuple arménien,
le parlement cantonal a suivi, par une nette majorité, la
recommandation de la commission chargée d’examiner ce rapport. Cette
commission recommandait de rejeter le rapport et d’adopter une
résolution de reconnaissance formelle du génocide des Arméniens.

Le Conseiller d’État Jean-Claude Mermoud, directeur du DIRE, semblait
fort pressé de conclure au plus vite une affaire qu’il n’arrivait plus
à maîtriser. Sa courte intervention finale n’évoquait plus l’absence
d’intentionalité du crime commis par les Jeunes Turcs à l’encontre des
Arméniens, et surtout elle ne revenait plus sur les argumentations
visant à affaiblir l’importance de la reconnaissance internationale du
génocide des Arméniens. Ces motivations constituaient pourtant la
colonne vertébrale du rapport du Conseil d’État, soulignant ainsi la
superficialité qui avait caractérisé sa rédaction. Le document, plein
d’imprécisions et dont l’ampleur des lacunes allait bien au-delà de la
simple méconnaissance (cf. en annexes la rapport de l’ASA), et qui
touchait à un argument fort sensible pour le partenaire économique
turc, arrivait mal à cacher la volonté de ne pas déplaire au DFAE et
au Seco. M. Mermoud devait conclure en disant qu’il ne s’opposait que
dans la manière d’accomplir le devoir de mémoire.

Les députés – toutes tendances confondues – ont reconnu les erreurs du
rapport et l’ont nettement rejeté par 85 voix contre, 51 pour et 12
abstentions. Ils ont en outre réitéré le devoir de mémoire assumé lors
de l’adoption du postulat Sandri, le 23 septembre 2003. Celui-ci avait
immédiatement provoqué l’annulation par Ankara de la visite de Madame
Calmy-Rey en Turquie, prévue dix jours plus tard. Ainsi, dans ces
lieux mêmes où les Puissances européennes avaient décrété en 1923,
avec la Turquie, la fin des droits politiques des Arméniens, les
Grands conseillers ont eux réaffirmé non seulement la pertinence, mais
surtout la responsabilité du politique de caractériser comme génocide
ce crime contre l’humanité et ils ont adopté, à une écrasante majorité
(86 voix pour, 35 contre et 25 abstentions) la résolution de
reconnaissance suivante:

« Le Grand Conseil du Canton de Vaud reconnaît le génocide du peuple
arménien de 1915 et honore la mémoire des victimes ».

Les interventions:
Suite à la présentation, par le président du groupe M. Roger Saugy,
des conclusions de la commission recommandant de rejeter le rapport du
Conseil d’État et d’adopter le projet de résolution, le député
Alexandre Bidaub (PS) analysait de façon très structurée les
contradictions du rapport; il rappelait la Convention de l’ONU de 1968
sur l’imprescriptibilité des crimes contre l’humanité et des crimes de
guerre, et il concluait que les États fédéraux, en tant que sujets
politiques indépendants, ont les mêmes compétences que les parlements
nationaux en matière de droits humains. M. Jean-Claude Gogniat
(libéral), opposé à l’adoption de la résolution, partait du fait que
beaucoup d’autres génocides n’avaient pas été reconnus jusqu’à présent
et qu’il n’y avait donc pas raison de reconnaître spécifiquement
celui-ci. Selon lui, la Turquie devrait accomplir son devoir de
mémoire seule, sans que l’on exerce sur elle une pression
externe. M. Jean Martin (radical) rappelait lui le juste droit du
Grand Conseil de juger s’il y avait eu génocide. Il était suivi par
François Cadosch (libéral), qui affirmait l’importance pour la Turquie
de laver une fois pour toute devant tous cette tâche de sang de son
drapeau. M. Régis Courdesse (libéral) devait souligner la
superficialité du rapport du Conseil d’État, tandis que M. Christian
Polin rappelait la toute nouvelle reconnaissance du génocide arménien
par le Bundestag allemand et rejettait le rapport, ne voulant pas
devenir ainsi complice de la négation de ce crime contre
l’humanité. M. Massimo Sandri (POP), auteur du postulat qui avait
débouché sur ce rapport, rappelait la phrase de Hitler: `Qui se
rappelle encore donc de l’extermination des Arméniens`, pour conclure
qu’il fallait justement en parler aujourd’hui et ici, dans cette même
salle où avait été signé le Traité de Lausanne. Il faisait projeter
une photo d’époque, où l’on reconnaissait les mêmes tables sur
lesquelles avait été signé le traité qui devait sceller la naissance
de la Turquie moderne et, en même temps, la condamnation des Arméniens
à l’oubli. M. Pierre Zwahlen (PS) intervenait en disant que cette
résolution pouvait aider la Turquie dans son travail de mémoire et que
l’art. 91 de la Constitution vaudoise autorisait le GC a entreprendre
une telle démarche de reconnaissance formelle. M. Denis Bouvier (POP)
introduisait alors une version amendée de la résolution, où le nom de
l’Empire ottoman apparaissait dans le cadre de la responsabilité de ce
génocide. Suite à une critique provenant notamment de l’UDC
(M. Jacques Chollet), préferant nettement la version concise de la
résolution, M. Bouvier décidait finalement de retirer sa
proposition. M. Jean-Claude Rochat (radical) soulignait l’importance
de rendre honneur aux victimes de ce génocide et rappelait que c’était
justement à la suite des pressions politiques externes que l’on
arriverait à pousser un État comme la Turquie à accomplir son devoir
de mémoire.

Pour conclure, le Conseiller d’État Jean-Claude Mermoud a pris la
parole en dernier, affirmant que sa seule divergence d’avec les
intervenants tenait dans la manière d’accomplir ce devoir de mémoire.
Il a exposé les difficultés diplomatiques intervenues à la suite de
l’adoption du postulat Sandri et ceci l’avait poussé à prendre contact
avec le Département de Madame Calmy-Rey. Il souhaitait que cette
résolution n’apporte pas d’avantage de difficultés aux relations
diplomatiques entre la Suisse et la Turquie. Après septante minutes
d’interventions caractérisées par une grande dignité, et destinées par
leur teneur au plus large public de toute la société vaudoise et
suisse, la discussion s’est terminée par l’adoption de la résolution
affirmant le reconnaissance du génocide des Arméniens.

DFAE Département fédéral des affaires étrangères
DIRE Département des institutions et des relations
extérieures (du
Canton de Vaud)
Seco Secrétariat d’Etat à l’économie

www.armenian.ch

NA vice-speaker addresses OSCE Parliamentary Assembly

NA vice-speaker addresses OSCE Parliamentary Assembly

07.07.2005 16:17

YEREVAN (YERKIR) – National Assembly Vice-speaker Vahan Hovhannisian,
who leads the Armenian delegation to the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly,
addressed on July 4 the Assembly session held in Washington, D.C.

Below is the text of Hovhannisian’s address.

Dear Colleagues,

I would like, today, to briefly update the Assembly on the key
elements of the current political situation and recent developments in
Armenia and the South Caucasus region.

But first, I would like to note that this April all Armenians
commemorated the 90th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide perpetrated
by the rulers of Ottoman Turkey starting in 1915. I think it would not
be an exaggeration to say that most of the current in our region stem
from those tragic events.

So, on this occasion, the Armenian delegation would like to express
our deep gratitude to the people and parliaments of the OSCE member
countries that, having found the courage not to remain silent, have
adopted the resolutions recognizing the Armenian Genocide. These
countries include Cyprus, Canada, Russia, Greece, Belgium, Sweden,
France, Italy, Switzerland, Slovakia, Netherlands, Poland, and
Germany.

Their actions represent vital steps toward urging all governments and
parliaments to be alert to the threats of new genocides and vigilant
in taking practical steps to preventing any possible further attempts
of genocide in any part of the world. This is especially important
today in light of our neighbor Turkey’s efforts to secure EU
membership even as it imposes a one-sided blockade on the Republic of
Armenia and refuses to establish diplomatic relations with Armenia.

Dear colleagues, two weeks ago the people of Nagorno Karabakh Republic
held parliamentary elections for the fourth time since establishing
independence in 1991. As many international observers stated in their
reports, the elections were conducted freely and in transparent
manner.

I want to thank the independent observers from many countries, who
have done so much important work in the place of international
organizations such as our distinguished Assembly, for their excellent
efforts in monitoring these elections and their fair and unbiased
attitude. Their reports clearly show that Nagorno Karabakh cannot be
considered a “lawless zone.” Some of Nagorno Karabakh’s neighbors can
learn a great deal from its example of holding democratic elections.

Dear colleagues, we witnessed the adoption of resolutions on Abkhazia
and Moldova. We see how much heated discussions they generated. But
they have one important thing in common: both Georgian and Moldavian
authorities in their sincere desire to settle these conflicts have
been directly negotiating – and are prepared to do so in the future –
with the authorities of Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transdnestria. As
such, we do not see a reason why the Azerbaijani authorities cannot do
the same and try to restore their contacts with elected authorities of
the Nagorno Karabakh, as was proposed by Mr. Lennmarker in his report.

I would like to use this opportunity to join our distinguished
President in commending the outstanding job done by his Special
Representative G. Lennmarker, whose ideas on the Nagorno Karabakh
conflict may provide the basis for future cooperation between the
Parliaments of Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Finally, I would like to note that earlier this year the Armenian
Parliament revised the Electoral Code in accordance with European
standards, a move which was welcomed by the Parliamentary Assembly of
the Council of Europe.

The political parties in Armenia have, at last, reached an agreement
about constitutional changes and amendments in accordance with the
recommendations of the Venice Commission. This accomplishment, I am
glad to report, fulfills our obligations to the Council of Europe.

ANKARA: Armenian Lobby Attempts Border Re-Opening

Zaman Online, Turkey
July 4 2005

Armenian Lobby Attempts Border Re-Opening
By Anadolu News Agency (aa)
Published: Monday July 04, 2005
zaman.com

The Armenian lobby submitted a new bill targeting Turkey to the US
House of Representatives.

The draft developed by Adam Schiff asks Washington to pressure Turkey
to re-open the Turkey-Armenian border gate. Democrat Party member,
Schiff, one of the leaders of the Armenian lobby, claims in the
document that keeping the border gate closed violates international
standards and increases cost of transporting goods to Armenia by
30-35 percent. The new bill, which has been submitted to the
International Relations committee at the House of Representatives,
demands the US make an announcement regarding taking certain measures
for the re-opening of the border gate by the US Secretary of State
within 30 days. “It is time that the US placed pressure on Turkey to
elimination the embargo that Turkey imposes on Armenia,” Schiff said.
Another leader of the Armenian lobby from the Democrat Party Frank
Pallone told in a statement: “President George W. Bush and the
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice cannot let Turkey impose an
embargo on Armenia without voicing their opposition and concerns.”

Schiff said Republican Committee President Henry Hyde promised to
discuss the bill in a sub-committee this month. The Armenian lobby
group at the US Congress had submitted another draft concerning the
recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide to the House of
Representatives on June 14.

Armenian authorities have no right to speak on behalf of Karabakh

Armenian authorities have no right to speak on behalf of Karabakh –
politician

Noyan Tapan news agency
3 Jul 05

YEREVAN

“The Armenian authorities are not authorized to speak on behalf of
Artsakh [Nagornyy Karabakh] today because Armenia has not yet
recognized Artsakh’s independence and has not declared it as its
integral part, Aram Sarkisyan, leader of the Democratic Party of
Armenia, has told journalists.

He expressed his confidence that the authorities of the Nagornyy
Karabakh Republic [NKR] should take back the right to defend the
interests of the NKR since “the Armenian authorities are up to their
eyeballs in corruption, and therefore, will easily agree to make any
compromise”.

A draft frame agreement on a peaceful solution to the Karabakh
conflict was adopted at a recent meeting between public
representatives of Armenia, Nagornyy Karabakh and Azerbaijan in Moscow
within the framework of the Dortmund conference on regional conflicts,
Sarkisyan said.

He believes that the implementation of this project will make it
possible to organize a negotiating process in which all three parties
will be in the same position. The project envisages that discussions
on the thorniest issues like the recognition of the NKR’s independence
by Azerbaijan and the return of the territories to Azerbaijan should
be avoided at the first stage.

Aram Sarkisyan said that the parties considered it expedient to divide
the settlement process into three stages. The first stage will define
the format of the negotiations, including statements by the
conflicting sides recognizing only a peaceful solution to the
problem. The second stage envisages confidence building measures along
with joint ecological and cultural programmes. The third stage
includes a comprehensive solution to the conflict stipulating both the
approval of Karabakh’s political status and a solution to Azerbaijan’s
territorial claims.

[Passage omitted: Other representatives of Armenia took part in the
meeting with journalists]

Aliyev: I wish Karabakh problem to be settled without bloodshed

ALIYEV: I WISH KARABAKH PROBLEM TO BE SETTLED WITHOUT BLOODSHED

Pan Armenian News
29.06.2005 04:56

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ “Various developments in the world are not of
benefit to Armenia. Azerbaijan as a part of the Euro-Atlantic region
is establishing relations with the EU and the US. Armenia is pursuing
a different policy, it has other allies”, Azerbaijani President Ilham
Aliyev stated, CNN-Turk reports. I. Aliyev expressed assurance that
“Armenia cannot compete with Azerbaijan economically.” “Azerbaijan’s
budget exceeds Armenia’s four times and I have ordered the government
to drive the gap up to ten times”, he stated. “Partnership with Turkey
is very important for us, since Azerbaijan, Turkey and Georgia become
a significant force in the region”, he added. “I do not doubt that
we will settle the Karabakh problem. I just want it to be settled
peacefully, without bloodshed”, the Azerbaijani President said.

Armenian, Russian CCIs To Hold Join Meeting In Yerevan

ARMENIAN, RUSSIAN CCIs TO HOLD JOIN MEETING IN YEREVAN

YEREVAN, June 28. /ARKA/. A joint meeting the Armenian and Russian
Chambers of Commerce and Industry (CCI), as well as an Armenian-Russian
business forum, are to be held in Yerevan on October-December
2005. According to the list of major arrangements of the Russian CCI
for the latter half of 2005, the join meeting and the business forum
are aimed at the development of cooperation and direct ties between
the two countries’ business communities. The business meeting will be
held as part of Year of Russia in Armenia. The meeting and business
forum have been organized by the Foreign Relations Department, RF CCI,
and the RA CCI. P.T. -0–

European Cups Draws

GeorgianSoccer.com, Georgia
June 25 2005

European Cups Draws

The draws for the Champions League and UEFA Cup qualifying rounds
were made in Switzerland on Friday. Champions Dinamo Tbilisi will
face the Estonian side Levadia Tallinn. The first leg will take place
in Estonia on either the 12/13th July with the return in Tbilisi a
week later. If Dinamo sucessfully defeats Levadia they will meet
Danish Champions Brondby in the 2nd qualifying round.
“All of the possible opponents for FC Dinamo in the first qualifying
round of the UCL were practically of the same strength. Thus we knew
the level of the club we would face in the preliminary round. Title
holders of Estonian championship can not be weak. Chances for
elimination from the tournament are equal for both teams. However we
promise to take any possible efforts to overcome Baltic barrier. Time
before the first leg match is enough for thorough preparation.” –
commented Dinamo head coach Kakhaber Tskhadadze.

In the UEFA Cup Torpedo Kutaisi were paired with Belarussian side
BATE Borisov. Dinamo Tbilisi faced BATE last season in the UEFA Cup
and defeated them 4-2 over two legs. Torpedo will play at home in the
first leg on 14th July with the return two weeks later in Belarus.
Lokomotivi Tbilisi were paired with Armenian side Banants Yerevan.
Lokomotivi will be in Armenia for the first leg.

Champions League

Levadia Tallinn (Estonia) vs Dinamo Tbilisi
(1st leg 12/13 July, 2nd leg 19/20 July)

Winners will face Brondby

UEFA Cup:

Banants Yerevan (Armenia) vs Lokomotivi Tbilisi
Torpedo Kutaisi vs BATE Borisov (Belarus)
(1st leg 14th July, 2nd leg 28th July)

Good day for Armenia and COE

A1plus

| 18:22:39 | 24-06-2005 | Politics | PACE SUMMER SESSION 2005 |

«GOOD DAY FOR ARMENIA AND COE»

«Today is a fine day both for Armenia and the COE. We did wonderful work
with the Armenian delegation and came to an agreement about all the issues»,
said the Venice Commission secretary Gianni Buquicchio after the end of the
session of the Venice Commission working group with the Armenian delegation.

Mr. Buquicchio mentioned that in all the three disputable issues which refer
to the power distribution, independence of court power and the Yerevan
mayor, and agreement has been reached with the Armenian delegation.

The Venice Commission Constitutional Rights department head Simona
Granata-Mengini, referring to the Yerevan problem, mentioned that the main
issue is no decide the status of Yerevan. «In this matter we came to an
agreement that in the Constitution the principle of Yerevan being a local
self-governing body must be stipulated, and the Yerevan mayor must be
elected. The order of election must be stated by law. The European standards
allow us to elect the mayor both directly and indirectly», she said.

Mrs. Granata-Mengini underlined that the most important thing is to
stipulate the principle of electing the Yerevan mayor by the Constitution.
«If it is stipulated that Yerevan is a community, that is enough, as by
another article in the Constitution it is stated that the community heads
are elected. There will be no problems if the Yerevan mayor is elected in a
different way. What is importnat is that he must be elected».