Political briefing: Foreign-born medic tells positive story

Politics: Political briefing: Foreign-born medic tells a positive story

MICHAEL WHITE, The Guardian – United Kingdom
Published: Jul 05, 2007

It has not been the best of weeks for foreign-born medics working in
the NHS. But the appointment yesterday of Sir Ara Darzi to spearhead
Gordon Brown’s "I Love NHS Staff" campaign tells a more positive story
about their contribution.

A Baghdad-born Armenian who grew up in Ireland, Sir Ara is one of the
world’s leading surgeons, a charismatic Renaissance man who operates at
6am, pioneers robotic non-invasive technology, and still finds time to
be a formidable committee man. His review of London hospital
reorganisation is due out next week.

All of which will come in handy as he becomes Lord Darzi (he needs the
peerage to become a minister) and takes up the challenge announced by
the health secretary, Alan Johnson, after Mr Brown’s first PMQs
yesterday: a sweeping staff-friendly review of how a properly-funded
NHS should function, completed in time for its 60th birthday – one year
from today.

Mr Johnson is admitting publicly what Patricia Hewitt came to
acknowledge privately, that years of hard-driving Whitehall targets,
ring-fenced funds and reorganisations has broken staff morale.

In pushing reform Hewitt became too much the budget-fixated manager,
too little the politician, her friends admit. Johnson’s matey tone and
refreshing candour yesterday (he even admitted that drugs are rationed)
pleased MPs, even those who complain that the Darzi review wasn’t worth
a full oral statement. That misses the point, which is symbolic: "This
time we really are going to listen and learn," ministers are saying.

They are bent on Brown-style devolution: patient choice as a better
driver of efficiency than targets, plus practice-based commissioning of
services – hospitals being given their orders by GPs, GPs who may work
in what Sir Ara likes best; multi-skilled "poly-clinics" which do some
hospital work cheaper.

All difficult stuff and not everyone will welcome a bunch of
clinicians, even led by Sir Ara, taking up the reins of reform. But
doctors’ goodwill, lost despite their generous pay rises, is vital to
pushing through better working practices and the acceptance of hospital
and ward closures. Meanwhile Mr Johnson promises to withdraw from using
his powers to resolve politically-sensitive cases.

Tory spokesman Andrew Lansley, who survived a Cameron cull, was
dismissive enough to invite Johnson to "come on and steal our clothes".
But No 10 seems to have gone off Cameron-esque ideas of a Bank of
England-style independent board to run the NHS. A constitution or
BBC-style charter may be its answer.

There is even speculation that chancellor Brown squirrelled away extra
cash for the NHS that prime minister Brown will announce in his October
spending review. Alan Johnson may have inherited the easy bit.

How The Visit Of The Intellectuals Was Estimated

HOW THE VISIT OF THE INTELLECTUALS WAS ESTIMATED
VARDAN GRIGORYAN

Hayots Ashkharh Daily – Armenia
30 June 07

The one-day visit of the delegation of Armenian and Azerbaijani
intellectuals to Nagorno-Karabakh, headed by Armenian and Azerbaijani
Ambassadors in Russia composers Armen Smbatyan and Polad Biulbiulogly
can be estimated as an initial attempt towards the basis of people’s
diplomacy.
Regardless of the impact of the before mentioned step on the
regulation of Karabakh issue and the improvement of the relations
between the two peoples, it is extremely motivating from the point of
view of the first responses.
The most important thing at present is, how the visit of the
intellectuals will be estimated in the political framework and among
the society. As NKR President Arkady Ghukasyan mentioned during his
meeting with the intellectuals in Stepanakert,’ Unless we take note of
each other’s viewpoint and create an atmosphere of trust, we will
undoubtedly be far from negotiation process.’
People’s diplomacy is aimed at overcoming the atmosphere of distrust
among the countries and the people. That is why the success or failure
of this procedure is measured first of all by the degree of the impact
on this atmosphere. In this respect, the observations of the results of
this visit record a strange fact.
In Armenia and Artsakh no one has uttered any positive or negative
word regarding the visit. Moreover in our society this visit has been
estimated the same way as any other regular visit of an international
organization or a diplomat.
In this respect the visit of the delegation of Armenian and
Azerbaijani intellectuals headed by Armen Smbatyan and Poland
Biulbiulogly had the same influence on our society as the visit of the
Head of the International Currency Fund Marta Castelo-Branko.
It seems that even if Ilham Aliev visits the capital of Armenia
there will be no particular interest towards this visit from the
intellectuals and let alone the society.
From the one hand it is good of course, as it reflects the
deep-rooted belief of our society that Karabakh issue is already
resolved. But on the other hand it is bad, as it demonstrates the
atmosphere of apathy.
But the picture is different in Azerbaijan, where almost all the
famous political and public figures have managed to express their
opinion about that `shocking event’. The variety of the opinions
manifested in Azerbaijan can be divided into three groups.
First: the political figures representing the official standpoint of
the country guided by the announcement of the representative of
Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry according to which the visit is only the
initiative of the two composer-diplomats and that in his opinion it
doesn’t prove the de facto recognition of NKR by Azerbaijan.
The supporters of the second standpoint immediately raised a
hullabaloo stating that the visit of Azerbaijani delegation headed by
Biulbiulogly is a betrayal and demanded to recall Azerbaijani
Ambassador in Moscow. Not only does the head of `Karabakh Liberation
Movement’ Akif Naghly support this idea but also, strange as it may
seem, representatives of influential pro-opposition powers Sardar
Jalaloghly, Isa Ghambar, Aly Kerimly.
The last group of the activists, as well as ex-State Secretary on
Foreign Affairs Vafa Guluzade evaluated this visit as a dangerous
attempt to make Nagorno Karabakh as a conflicting party and it plays
into the hands of Armenian diplomacy.
The third group of estimations includes the small part of
politicians and political figure that are extremely enthusiastic about
this visit.
Thus unlike Armenians, the response of Azerbaijani political
frameworks and the society regarding the first step towards people’s
diplomacy was extremely sharp, thus reconfirming the fact that the two
peoples and societies have diametrically different approaches towards
the dialogues between the two countries.
Armenian society and especially its Armenian sector are quite
indifferent to this issue, but Karabakh people manifest great and
direct interest towards it. As for Azerbaijani society, it preserves
the hostile prejudices characteristic to the `cold war’ period, with
its overwhelming majority.

The unification of the Georgian kingdoms

The unification of the Georgian kingdoms

1/63/
Saturday, 30 June 2007

By George Nikoladze

In 1008, the Bagrationi (Georgian Royal House) ruler Bagrat III of
Georgia united the kingdoms of Abkhazia (Apkhazeti) and rest of Georgia
into a single Georgian feudal state. The second half of the 11th
century was marked by the disastrous invasion of the Seljuk Turks who
by the end of 1040s succeeded in building a vast nomadic empire
including most of the Central Asia and Iran.

In 1071 Seljuk army destroyed the united Byzantine-Armenian and
Georgian forces in the battle of Mantsikert, and by 1081, all of
Armenia, Anatolia, Mesopotamia, Syria and most of Georgia were
conquered and devastated by the Seljuks. The Anti-Seljuk struggle in
Georgia was led by the young King David IV who inherited the throne in
1089 in the age of 16 after the death of his father George II
Bagrationi. Soon after coming to power, David re-built regular army and
created peasant militia in order to be able to resist Seljuk
colonization of the country. The First Crusade (1096-1099) and
Crusaders’ offensive against Seljuk Turks in Anatolia and Syria favored
David’s attempts to re-conquer Georgian lands. By the end of 1099 David
stopped paying tribute to the Seljuks and put most of Georgian lands
except Tbilisi and Ereti under his effective control having Abkhazia
and Svanetia as his reliable rear bases. In 1105-1124 Georgian armies
under King David undertake a series of brilliant campaigns against the
Seljuk Turks and liberate not only the rest of Georgia but also
Christian-populated Ghishi- Kabala area in western Shirvan and a big
portion of Armenia. During the same period of time, Georgian
protectorate was established over Alania (1120) and Islamized eastern
Shirvan (1124). Several months later, King David died (01/1125) leaving
Georgia with the status of a strong regional power. In his country,
King David is called Agmashenebeli. That can be translated into English
as `the re-constructor’ or `the restorer’

http://www.abkhazia.com/content/view/32

It Is Time To Think About New Partnership Program, IMF Mission Says

IT IS TIME TO THINK ABOUT NEW PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, IMF MISSION HEAD SAYS

YEREVAN, JUNE 29, NOYAN TAPAN. The Armenian prime minister Serge
Sargsian on June 28 received the head of the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) mission Martha Castelo-Branco and the delegation headed by
her, NT was informed by the RA Government Information and PR
Department.

M. Castelo-Branco appreciated Armenia’s cooperation with the IMF since
1992 when the country joined the IMF. She underlined that in the IMF’s
opinion, Armenia has registered a considerable growth and conducted a
reasonable tax-budgetary and monetary-credit policy. In her words,
Armenia’s currency exchange rate police has been most flexible as
compared with other regional countries.

At the same time M. Castelo-Branco said that there are still some
challenges, and serious efforts should be made to overcome them. In
particular, among such challenges are the difficulty of maintaining the
two-digit economic growth rates registered in recent years, the review
of tax collection ratio (with a tendency to increase it), internal
competition, problems connected to monopolies, improvement of the
business environment, which in its turn includes a number of issues:
accessibilty of credits, improvement of infrastructures.

The IMF mission head attached importance to the identification of
possible risks and the implementation of steps aimed at overcoming of
these risks, around which discussions are being conducted with the RA
minsitry of finance and economy and the Central Bank of Armenia (CBA).

The IMF program in Armenia will be completed in May 2008. According to
M. Castelo-Branco, it is time to think about the next partnership
program. She attached special importance to such directions as
improvement of tax administration, extension of the tax base,
development of the financial market, and fight agains the shadow
economy. She underlined that the IMF is ready to assist with solution
of these problems and will continue to promote the reforms aimed at
stabilizing Armenia’s macroeconomic, particularly, payment and
settlement system.

The Armenian prime minister in his turn said that henceforth the IMF’s
experience and recommendation will also be useful for Armenia.
According to S. Sargsian, all indices, which the Armenian government
will discuss with the IMF, will be fulfilled.

Armenia’s Position Unchangeable: De Jure Recognition Of Nagorno Kara

ARMENIA’S POSITION UNCHANGEABLE: DE JURE RECOGNITION OF NAGORNO KARABAKH AND PARTICIPATION OF NKR REPRESENTATIVES IN TALKS

PanARMENIAN.Net
29.06.2007 15:26 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Azerbaijan’s problem is the lack of political
will to tell the public about the ongoing talks on the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict. The publics of both states should be informed of
the fundamental settlement principles. The statements of the sides
should not be mutually exclusive," Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan
Oskanian told a news conference in Yerevan.

"The international community knows the worth of Ilham Aliyev’s
statements and doesn’t always rate them as adequate," he said.

"Armenia has numerously repeated the settlement principles. These
are the status of Nagorno Karabakh, security guarantees, overland
communication with Armenia, territorial issues, refugees and displaced
persons. The negotiated document contains all these elements but
before determination of the status I will no comment on other
issues. Armenia’s position has undergone no changes since 1997. We
press for de jure recognition of Nagorno Karabakh and participation
of NKR representatives in the talks. I am ready to work with the next
NKR President," the Minister said.

When commenting on possible changes after the NKR presidential
election, Vartan Oskanian said, "This subject is mush spoken about,
however, there is no serious ground for it."

As to the regular meeting of the Armenian and Azeri FMs, Mr Oskanian
said, "The OSCE MG Co-chairs will hold separate negotiations
with each Minister. After that it will be possible to speak of
Oskanian-Mammadyarov meeting."

Goverment Suggests Amendments Striping RFE/RL Of Air In Armenia

GOVERNMENT SUGGESTS AMENDMENTS STRIPING RFE/RL OF AIR IN ARMENIA

Panorama.am
17:29 28/06/2007

The Armenian parliament extraordinary session is discussing a
package of bills suggesting changes and additions to the Law on
State Dues and the Law on Radio and TV. Submitted by the government,
the package assumes that Armenian TV and radio charge extra state due
for programs broadcast by the national offices or services of foreign
media outlets. Some experts say the bill will endanger freedom of
speech in our country, particularly that of RFE/RL. Internews has
raised concern saying the bill "may cause unforeseen consequences."

Mesrop Harutunyan, an expert of Yerevan Press Club, told Panorama.am:
"This is a political decision" also saying it has been taken at the
House of the Armenian President. According to the expert, some have
been saying from the President’s House since last year RFE/RL is
not objective, therefore, the package "aims to halt RFE/RL programs
in Armenia."

Georgian Minister Of Justice Visits Akhalkalak To Answer Citizens’ Q

GEORGIAN MINISTER OF JUSTICE VISITS AKHALKALAK TO ANSWER CITIZENS’ QUESTIONS

Noyan Tapan
Jun 29, 2007

AKHALKALAK, JUNE 29, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. On June 29, Gia
Kavtaradze, the Minister of Justice of Georgia, arrived in Akhalkalak.

According to Javakhk-Info, the goal of the visit was to meet with the
local citizens, to listen to the questions interesting them trying
to clear them up as far as possible.

"The initiative of organizing such an action belongs to the
Ministry. Its goal is that the local population instead of leaving for
Tbilisi will be able to get the answers of the questions interesting
them connected with the passport and other migration problems on the
spot," said Artur Yeremian, the Head of the Akhalkalak Municipality.

In Turkey Erdoghan’s Ambitious Plans About Building A Joint Future A

IN TURKEY ERDOGHAN’S AMBITIOUS PLANS ABOUT BUILDING A JOINT FUTURE ARE IN DOUBT

PanARMENIAN.Net
26.06.2007 GMT+04:00

One of the most important achievements of the Summit of the
Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation is that EU was
granted the status of observer in BSEC.

The jubilee Summit of BSEC ended with the adoption of the concluding
declaration, where the participants of the Summit spoke of their
intention to make the Black Sea region a stable and prosperous part
of Europe. The BSEC member countries have agreed upon expending the
cooperation especially in the sphere of energy.

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ In the document the parties announced about a
number of important events. "The initiative regarding the project
of the regional cooperation in the Black Sea region justified all
the efforts. Regarding this the parties are willing to continue the
further consolidation of the role of BSEC as an active and reliable
partner in the regional and international affairs. We confirm the
wish to strengthen the cooperation in the sphere of energy taking
into account the interests of the countries, which produce, use and
transfer it," the Declaration states.

According to the Turkish Prime Minister Redgep Erdoghan the Istanbul
Summit will be the turning point in the BSEC activity. "At last we
began the realization of the practical projects. The joint economic
projects among the countries will help to find ways to conflict
resolution in the region and to establish friendly relationship
between the countries of the Black Sea Region," mentioned the Turkish
Prime-Minister. However the Turkish mass media put Erdoghan’s ambitious
plans about building a joint future in doubt. The skepticism was caused
by the announcement made by the RA Minister of Foreign Affairs Vartan
Oskanyan, saying that for developing economic and commercial relations
between Armenia and Turkey, Ankara should first of all open the borders
with Armenia and recognize the Armenian Genocide. "If you take the
dialogue between Yerevan and Ankara seriously, be so kind to first of
all open the borders. If the Armenian-Turkish border is opened, the
Armenian side will be ready to establish cooperation on the government
level for discussing the problems which impede the normalization of
the relations between our countries," noted Vartan Oskanyan.

Oskanyan also mentioned that the absence of the Armenian President
can be explained with the absence of the diplomatic relations
between Armenia and Turkey. "Black Sea has united us during many
centuries. Today we have the same possibility though we don’t take
advantage of this chance in our interest. Sometimes the water is so
deep that we prefer to stay away from it. I think that the political
potential of BSEC isn’t completely covered," underlined the Head of
the RA Department of Foreign Policy.

Vartan Oskanyan also spoke about the Karabakh Conflict,
underlining that "the people of Nagorno-Karabakh have the right
of self-determination and security", which was followed by Ilham
Aliyev’s usual answer, "The war is not over. Only the first stage is
over. The present situation can’t go on forever and we will not let
our territories "in occupation". Strangely enough nothing was said
about the refugees, though he didn’t forget to mention about the 20%
of the Azeri territories that "Armenia has to vacate immediately".

One of the most important achievements of the summit of the
Organization of Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) is that EU was
granted the status of observer in BSEC. According to RF Ministry
of Foreign Affairs it is only the first step. "Equal and mutually
beneficial cooperation will give a boost to building the Big Europe
with no separating lines," believes the First Deputy of the RF Minister
of Foreign Affairs Denisov. However everything is not as smooth
as Russia believes. According to the economist Fatiha Arslan, the
Black Sea region plays a greater role for energy transportation. "We
support the Russian project of establishing a joint energy circle
which would allow connecting all the energy systems of the European
countries in the Black Sea region. As the Russian President assures
each country will have free access to the source. However in Turkey
truthfulness of such announcements are in doubt and it is assured that
such announcements are dictated by the desire of gaining control over
the energy transportation," he believes.

"PanARMENIAN.Net" analytical department

Armenia’s Vanishing Udis

ARMENIA’S VANISHING UDIS
By Tatul Hakopian in Dedebavan

Institute for War and Peace Reporting IWPR, UK
June 28 2007

Small community is slowly losing its ancient language.

Seda Kumsieva, a teacher for 36 years, lives in Armenia although
she used to teach Russian language and literature in the village of
Vardashen in Azerbaijan.

The crisis of the late Eighties that led to the Armenian-Azerbaijani
war over Nagorny Karabakh forced her to flee her home and resettle
in Armenia.

Seda is an ethnic Udi – a Christian group with its own unique language
– but her husband is Armenian, a fact which sealed her fate.

Her family is now scattered across the Caucasus.

"Some of my relatives stayed in Vardashen, others settled in Tbilisi.

I am completely Udi by blood, but my husband is Armenian and we and
other families who had mixed marriages left Azerbaijan," she said.

Eleven Udis from Azerbaijan resettled in Dedebavan and many more have
found homes in other villages. In conversations with IWPR, the Udis
made it clear they feel quite secure in Armenia, but are worried that
their unique culture is dying out.

The head of the village community in Dedebavan Georgy Babayan told
IWPR, "We don’t make any distinction between Armenians and Udis.

During the emigration from Vardashen in 1988, several Udi families
came with the Armenians. Later on, many of them emigrated to Russia.

We are the same as the Udis – we share our joy and grief with them."

Hranush Kharatian, an ethnographer who has written extensively about
the Udis, says that there are only around 200 of them in Armenia.

"The community does not have the status of a national minority,"
he said. "Today there isn’t a single regulatory document on this issue.

Only those groups which systematically try to preserve their ethnic
identity are recognised as minorities."

Kharatian said that the Udis had fled Azerbaijan not just because of
mixed marriages with Armenians, but because they were a persecuted
minority.

"Udis who were persecuted in Nij have resettled in the Georgian village
of Oktomberi. Until the recent deportations from Azerbaijan there
were not just two but five whole Udi villages. We don’t know much
about three of the villages, because although the Udis living there
were Christians, they spoke Azeri. These villages were called Jourlu,
Mirzabeilu and Sultan Nukhi. Several people from there emigrated
to Armenia."

Seda Kumsieva uses her cousins in Tbilisi – who now go by the surname
Kumsiashvili – to get information about relatives who stayed behind in
her home village. She still badly misses Vardashen – now renamed Oduz.

"Although our way of life and traditions are Armenian, Udis have
their own specific festivals," she said. "As a child, I remember how
in May they used to tie multi-coloured threads round the hands of
little children and then hang these little bundles on the branches
of trees. Everyone used to make a wish to have their dream come true.

The festival was called Dimbaz."

Forty-five-year-old Zanna Lalayan is married to an Armenian and her
family is also scattered. "My brother Oleg and other relatives live
in Nij. My other brother and other relatives live in Ukraine – his
children don’t know the Udi language. Our generation of Udis based
in Russia and other countries doesn’t know our language.

"Our nation is gradually dwindling."

Seventy-year-old Arshaluis Movsisian, an Udi whose late husband was
Armenian, lives in the village of Bagratashen and left behind a large
part of her family, a whole troop of nieces and nephews. "My heart is
breaking, I want to see their faces," she said, holding back the tears.

"Like the Armenians, we recognise the cross and the church," she
said. "We didn’t marry our girls off to Azerbaijanis and we didn’t
marry theirs, because we are people of the cross. Like the Armenians,
our brides come out in white clothes, with uncovered faces , we dance
Armenian dances and bury our dead according to Armenian customs.

Apart from the language, we are no different to them."

Armenian historians, like their Azerbaijani counterparts, say that the
Udis are the descendants of the Caucasian Albanians. But Armenians
say the process of assimilation happened much earlier – that the
Albanians converted to the Armenian church in the 5th century and at
the same time began to adopt the Armenian language, customs and names.

The Udis alone, the historians say, survived as a tiny remnant of a
once much bigger culture. They point out that the Udis’ language has
nothing in common with either Indo-European Armenian or Turkic Azeri.

Some unique Udi customs also seem to date back to pre-Christian times.

Arzu Dargiyan recalls how in Azerbaijan they used to pay homage
to sacred trees. "We would choose a fruit tree in the garden and
performed an act of worship in front of it," she said. "We lit candles
and sacrificed animals. It was forbidden to climb the sacred tree or
pick its fruit. You could only eat them if they fell from the tree."

Oleg Dulgarian is an Udi also from Vardashen, although he left as a
small child. He runs a non-governmental organisation for refugees,
and is passionate about trying to preserve the culture of this ancient
but tiny community.

Dulgarian says that he wants to create an organization called "Aghvank"
(the ancient name for Caucasian Albania) that will aim to preserve
traditions and engage in academic study of the Udis.

"It’s not a problem to be an Udi in Armenia; no one forces us
to renounce our ethnicity. The main problems that Udis who have
emigrated from Azerbaijan face are the same as those facing the
Armenian refugees."

Dulgarian wants to get government help for his project but the
main element of Udi culture – their language – is now in apparently
terminal decline.

"My sons don’t speak Udi at all," lamented Alexei Kazarov, who also
fled from Vardashen. "Our nation is gradually disappearing. There
are only eight or ten thousand Udis left in the whole world."

Tatul Hakopian is a political observer for Public Radio in Armenia.

EU, Turkey Resume Integration Talks As France Blocks Expansion – 1

EU, TURKEY RESUME INTEGRATION TALKS AS FRANCE BLOCKS EXPANSION – 1

RIA Novosti, Russia
June 26 2007

BRUSSELS, June 26 (RIA Novosti) — The European Union and Turkey opened
membership talks in two policy areas Tuesday as France blocked a third
‘chapter’ for discussion.

The EU delegation at the talks is led by German Foreign Minister
Frank-Walter Steinmeier, whose country holds the EU presidency,
and Olli Rehn, EU commissioner for enlargement, while the Turkish
delegation is headed by Economy Minister Ali Babacan.

The two sides opened talks on statistics and financial control,
but France vetoed negotiations on economic and monetary policy.

"We are not satisfied with the technical explanations provided to
us so far and hope that [better] progress will be achieved during
Portugal’s EU presidency," Babacan said.

Even before he won presidential elections in France, Nicolas Sarkozy
stated he opposed Turkey’s EU membership, because it belongs "not in
the European Union but a Mediterranean Union."

The EU-Turkey negotiating process, which started in October 2005,
comprises 35 policy areas or chapters. Experts say membership talks
could take anywhere between 10 and 15 years.

Greece’s president, during a visit to Armenia, said Friday that Turkey
should implement all EU conditions required for membership.

"The negotiating process on Turkey’s admission to the EU started in
2005, and Greece has been a supporter from the start of the talks.

However, the Turkish side should fulfill the main condition – respect
the values that other EU countries follow, for example, Bulgaria and
Romania – the latest countries to join the EU," Karolos Papoulias
told journalists.

Papoulias said he hoped Turkey would resolve the issue of its "35,000
strong occupation force currently based on the territory of a sovereign
EU member state [Cyprus]."