Levon Ter-Petrosian Meets With Leadership Of Orinats Yerkir Party

LEVON TER-PETROSIAN MEETS WITH LEADERSHIP OF ORINATS YERKIR PARTY

Noyan Tapan
Oct 16, 2007

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 16, NOYAN TAPAN. On October 16, first Armenian
President Levon Ter-Petrosian met with Artur Baghdasarian, the leader
of the Orinats Yerkir (Country of Law) party and the parliamentary
faction of the same name. As Noyan Tapan correspondent was informed
by a reliable source, Alexander Arzumanian, the former RA Foreign
Minister, a member of the ANM Board, and Heghine Bisharian, the
Vice-Chairwoman of the Orinats Yerkir Party, also took part in the
meeting.

La Stampa: L’America, La Turchia E Il Genocidio Negato

L’AMERICA, LA TURCHIA E IL GENOCIDIO NEGATO

La Stampa, Italia
11 ottobere 2007

Per Ankara è una parola tabù. Ma allora come lo chiamimao il massacro
di massa degli armeni?

La Turchia si sente oltraggiata dall’approvazione in Commissione esteri
del Congresso americano di una mozione che riconosce il carattere di
"genocidio" ai massacri degli armeni di Anatolia negli anni 1915-16,
e richiama il suo ambasciatore a Washington per consultazioni. Bush
ce l"ha messa tutta per evitare che si arrivasse a questo, ma non
controlla completamente il Congresso, e non ce l’ha fatta. Immediata
e viperina reazione di Ankara: "Inaccettabile".

Ora, che gli armeni siano stati brutalmente massacrati in massa, non
è un’opinione, ma un fatto, appurato da storici,testimoni e ricerche.

Vedi, per tutti, il libro, e poi film "La masseria delle allodole",
che racconta qualcosa che, se non si può chiamare genocidio, davvero
non si sa come definire altrimenti.

Tuttavia, in Turchia, anche i più democratici, i più critici verso
il governo, si risentono di questa parola, parlano oscuramente di
casi isolati, rifiutano l’idea. La stampa turca è stata unanime
nel condannare la mozione congressuale americana. Il commento più
feroce è venuto dal giornale Vatan, che definisce "imbecilli" i 27
parlamentari americani che l’hanno votata in commissione, ed aggiunge:
"Hanno svenduto, per ragioni di politica interna, il loro più grande
alleato in questa regione problematica".

Certo, la realpolitik suggerisce di dare ragione ai turchi e e cedere
a quello che pare, ed è, un ricatto. E allora, niente genocidio?

Forse una nicredibile serie di morti accidentali?

=72248740162769&lang=it-IT&w=76308fc3

–B oundary_(ID_85XZrb6M6OT8Vq9IcoEMhQ)–

http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q

"Genocidio" armeno? No, o scoppia l’Iraq

Il Manifesto, Italia
12 Ottobre 2007

«Genocidio» armeno? No, o scoppia l’Iraq
Orsola Casagrande

Lo si potrebbe chiamare voto di scambio. Quello che ieri il
segretario di stato americano Condoleezza Rice, prima, e lo stesso
presidente George W Bush, poi, hanno dichiarato sulla risoluzione
all’esame del Congresso che riconosce il genocidio degli armeni in
Turchia, è sostanzialmente una richiesta di baratto. Approvare quella
risoluzione, ha detto la Rice, «potrebbe creare problemi» agli sforzi
degli Stati Uniti di stabilizzare il Medio Oriente.
Per Rice il rischio, se la risoluzione verrà approvata, è quello di
destabilizzare ulteriormente la regione. Bush, chiedendo ai membri
del Congresso di respingere la risoluzione, ha detto che «approvarla
provocherebbe gravi danni» alle relazioni già teste tra Ankara e
Washington. La Turchia, secondo esercito della Nato e uno dei due
(l’altro è Israele) alleati di ferro degli Usa, attraversa una crisi
pesante nei suoi rapporti con gli americani.
Già nel 2003, quando fu decisa l’invasione dell’Iraq, Ankara voltò le
spalle agli alleati votando in parlamento il rifiuto a concedere le
proprie basi agli aerei e ai militari della coalizione dei
volenterosi. Da allora un lento e complesso lavoro diplomatico è
riuscito a ricucire in parte lo strappo. Ma la situazione in nord
Iraq, dove l’idea di un Kurdistan autonomo è per la Turchia un
anatema e per gli americani l’unica possibilità di mantenere almeno
quel pezzo di Iraq più o meno pacificato, ha nuovamente teso la
corda.
Che rischia di spezzarsi sui continui avvertimenti di Washington
all’alleato che preme per entrare in Iraq, ufficialmente per dare il
colpo di grazia ai guerriglieri kurdi del Pkk. Dopo l’ennesimo
scontro tra militari e guerriglia, a farne le spese del quale sono
stati 13 soldati, le forze armate hanno chiesto e ottenuto dal
governo di Recep Tayyip Erdogan il via libera ad usare qualunque
mezzo necessario, comprese le azioni militari oltre confine, per
contrastare il Pkk. Gli Usa hanno reagito: un intervento armato della
Turchia rischierebbe di compromettere la fragile stabilità nel nord
dell’Iraq.
Non è un mistero infatti che Ankara abbia già in passato alzato la
voce con gli alleati americani proprio sugli armeni. La Turchia, che
in una sorta di rimozione storica collettiva, nega il genocidio e
sostanzialmente anche il massacro degli armeni nel 1915 (un milione e
mezzo di persone, secondo le stime ufficiali), ha minacciato
ritorsioni se tale risoluzione fosse stata approvata. E non è un caso
che il ministro della difesa Robert Gates, al fianco di Condoleezza
Rice, abbia voluto precisare che proprio dai comandanti militari di
stanza in Iraq arriva la preoccupazione per le possibili
ripercussioni che tale risoluzione potrebbe causare. Circa il 70% dei
trasporti cargo aerei diretti in Iraq, ha ricordato Gates, transitano
proprio dalla Turchia.
Più esplicito ancora il presidente Bush. «Sollecito – ha detto – i
membri del Congresso a opporsi alla risoluzione sul genocidio degli
armeni all’esame della Commissione esteri». Bush ha aggiunto: «Siamo
tutti profondamente spiacenti per le tragiche sofferenze del popolo
armeno, cominciate nel 1915, ma questa risoluzione non è la risposta
giusta a questo massacro storico e la sua approvazione causerebbe un
grande danno alle nostre relazioni con un alleato chiave nella Nato e
nella guerra globale al terrorismo».

diano-archivio/11-Ottobre-2007/art51.html

http://www.ilmanifesto.it/Quoti

Gazprom keen on Armenia oil refinery

Press TV, Iran
Oct 13 2007

Gazprom keen on Armenia oil refinery

Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:16:48

Gazprom is interested in constructing a refinery in Armenia.
Russia’s energy Gazprom Company has said it is positive about a joint
project on construction of an oil refinery with Iran in Armenia.

Gazprom Neft – the oil arm of the Russian energy company Gazprom – is
reportedly considering an investment of $1.7 billion to build the
joint oil refinery, which would process oil pumped from Tabriz in
northern Iran, `The Messenger’ reported.

Gazprom officials say it will process 5-6 million tons of oil
annually. Some would be used by Armenia; most would be shipped back
to Iran.

Valery Golubev, head of Gazprom’s investment and construction
department, commented that the project is still in the offing but an
appropriate 400 hectare site for the refinery has yet to be found.

Some Russian commentators suggest the project is motivated by
political rather than financial interests, as usually the most
economically right location for an oil refinery is near a major
pipeline route or at a seaport.

However, Gazprom replies that with effective management, the refinery
could be economically profitable and may offer competition for
Azerbaijan, the main oil exporter in the South Caucasus.

However, Regnum quotes Gobulev as saying, `Building an oil refinery
in Armenia is interesting for Gazprom from the geopolitical point of
view.’

The American Case Against a Turkish Invasion

The Conservative Voice, NC
Oct 13 2007

The American Case Against a Turkish Invasion
October 13, 2007 01:00 PM EST

by Martin Zehr

Recent activity by the Turkish military and government presents a
real danger of invasion by Turkey against the Kurdish Autonomous
region. Next week the Turkish Parliament will be voting to approve
military action against the Kurdish Autonomous Region. While the US
State Department has opposed such actions, as have the EU and Russia,
it clearly remains a likely scenario in the near future that Turkish
troops will invade southern Kurdistan in its never-ending military
campaign against the Kurdish resistance movement. Americans who
support the rights of the Kurdish nation confront a mixed
proposition. While I adamantly oppose the US occupation of Iraq, I
cannot simply stand by and accept Turkish military intervention as a
solution to the oppression of Kurds as a viable option in resolving
the longstanding conflict. For too long, Turkish troops have
displaced hundreds of Kurdish villages and killed tens of thousands
of Kurds in Turkey. It is important now to present a strong and
singular warning to Turkey of the consequences of such an attack on
the Kurdish Autonomous Region within Iraq.

The US Senate recently approved a resolution that recognized the
concept of federalism within the Iraqi state. It is not binding on
Iraq, or on the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). It does propose
that the national aspirations of the Kurdish people be recognized
internationally in the political reconfiguration in regards to the
rights of both sects and the Kurdish nation in post-occupation
scenario. The KRG has proposed a national dialogue within Iraq on
this issue. Too often there is a presumption that the three have
common but distinct goals in the removal of US troops. The fact is
that the Kurdish position focuses on preserving the autonomy of the
Kurdistan Regional Government within the context of a weaker central
Iraqi government or, failing that, to establish its own state. There
is no desire to subordinate the KRG’s ability to protect Kurdish
people to others whose failure to defend the Kurdish people in the
recent past stands as a historical legacy. Neither is it acceptable
for the US to stand blind to the mass murders of Kurds as it did
after the Persian Gulf War.

There is no obscuring the issue given the recent activity of the
Turkish military. Its record in regards to displacements of Kurdish
villages and mass murders stands despite its denials. The historic
actions of the Ottoman Empire against Armenians stand as a clear
warning that the Turkish government’s actions do not match their
words. A Congressional Committee today approved a resolution
condemning this genocide of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire. Clearly,
the Turkish government of Prime Minister Erdogan is seeking not only
to continue to deny the genocide against the Armenians but is seeking
to widen its conflict against the Kurds today.

Americans need to support the Kirkuk referendum as a non-violent and
democratic means of determining the status of Kirkuk within Iraq. If
it is decided to be integrated as part of the Kurdish Autonomous
Region, this would empower those within the borders of Iraq to decide
their own destiny. The Turkish opposition to the right to hold this
referendum is an unwarranted interference in the affairs of another
country. Turkmen within Kirkuk are by no means excluded from this
process, but they are by no means represented by the Turkish
government. If the Turkish goal is to annex the Kurdish Autonomous
Region into Turkey, clearly a military invasion will attempt to make
this a fait accompli. This will not demonstrate the will of the
Kurdish people who have voted overwhelmingly in support of their
national sovereignty. At issue is the very right for the Kurdish
nation to establish their own government to represent their people.

American people need to be taught the recent history of relations
within Iraq and the roles of Iran, Iraq and Turkey and why it is so
critical that Kurds have the ability to determine their future for
themselves. This is not an advocacy for US occupation of Turkey, or
for military action against Iran. There is no hidden alliance here
between the Kurdish nation and Israel to increase Israeli control. It
is solely an effort to defend the legitimate demands of the Kurdish
people and their right to construct their own future. American
military aid to Turkey has made possible their ability to become such
a powerful force in the region. This aid should be suspended until
Turkey ceases its provocations. Turkish occupation is not an
alternative to US occupation. As it stands, the US military has not
played any significant role in the Kurdish Autonomous Region. Peace
and tranquility has been established by the current consensus of
Kurdish peoples to self-government within the Iraqi state.

The rights of the peoples of southern Kurdistan have been
constitutionally defined. The Kirkuk referendum has been mandated in
the Constitution in Article 140. While this is by no means the final
resolution of the issue, the Kurdistan Regional Government has worked
as a distinct entity, recognized by all other parties within Iraq. It
has distinct interests that distinguish it from those in the Sunni
and Shi’a sects. Americans sometimes confuse the sectarian positions
from the Kurdish national right to self-determination. As a
politically recognized entity within Iraq, the Kurdish Autonomous
Region is distinguished from the status of the sects and the parties
that represent them. It is possible to promote the Kurdish rights
without presuming the right of US occupation. There is a need to
demonstrate international commitments to the defense of the Kurdish
nation.

American people can readily accept the distinctions. We have no right
to impose on the Kurdish people, given the actions of Saddam Hussein,
the requirement to support any subjugation of the Kurdish nation. The
solution lies within the expressed desires of the Kurdish people.
Americans need to understand what this means. It means that Turkey
has NO right to interfere in the rights to self-government of the
Kurdish peoples within Iraq.

American people can readily accept the distinctions. We have no right
to impose on the Kurdish people, given the actions of Saddam Hussein,
the requirement to subordinate their effort to self-determination to
the interests of those who have subjected them in the recent past to
mass murders. The solution lies within the expressed desires of the
Kurdish people. Americans need to understand what this means. It
means that Turkey has NO right to interfere in the rights to
self-government of the Kurdish peoples within Iraq.

Educational work is necessary to expose the true character of the
Turkish war against Kurds that has been going on for 30 years. The
role of the PKK in this struggle remains a matter that needs to be
included without fear of being critical of particular tactics that it
has used in its history. The fundamental issue is the discrimination
and national oppression of Kurdish people by the Turkish government
and the reign of terror on rural Kurds by the Turkish military. To
suggest that recent military moves by the Turkish military are based
on attacks on the Turkish military by the PKK needs to be exposed in
the context of Turkey’s unending dedication to crush ANY form of
Kurdish self-government in the region and prevent the construction of
a stable economy.

icle/28594.html

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/art

Turkey too dependent on U.S. to take harsh measures

PanARMENIAN.Net

Turkey too dependent on U.S. to take harsh measures
12.10.2007 13:42 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ `The steps will be the same as in case with France
and Poland when these countries recognized the Armenian
Genocide. There will be condemning statements which, however, will
never result in complete severance of diplomatic relations. Even
after the recent parliamentary elections, Turkey sees itself as a part
of Euro-Atlantic but not Near-Eastern region,’ he said.

`Turkey is being pressed in all directions – from the Kurdish problem
to democratization of the society. The Armenian Genocide resolution
adopted by the U.S. House Foreign Relations Committee is an important
tool in this process,’ Dr Iskandaryan said.

Armenian Killings Called ‘Genocide’ By House Panel

ARMENIAN KILLINGS CALLED ‘GENOCIDE’ BY HOUSE PANEL
By Lisa Friedman, Washington Bureau

Los Angeles Daily News
Oct 11 2007

WASHINGTON – Casting aside threats of international retaliation by
Turkish officials, the House Foreign Affairs Committee voted Wednesday
to unconditionally declare the killing of thousands of Armenians in
the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War I a "genocide."

The 27-21 vote came after more than four hours of searing debate
pitting calls for America to take a moral stand against the realpolitik
of offending Turkey, a major route for air cargo, fuel and other
supplies for U.S. troops in Iraq.

Turks, including three members of parliament who flew to Washington
for the hearing, looked on grimly as the vote tally was read.

Elderly Armenians, including a handful who lived through the massacres
of 1915-23, hugged one another, cheered and wept.

"It’s personal for every Armenian. Almost all Armenians have been
affected in some way from the genocide that occurred," said Andrew
Kzirian of Glendale, in Washington to witness the vote.

Kzirian, executive director of the Armenian National Committee of
America’s Western Region, called the committee’s vote a victory for
human rights.

"It shows that members of Congress are very concerned that genocides
stop occurring. The goal is not to let it happen again," he said.

The resolution now heads to the House floor, where it stands its
first real chance of getting a vote in decades. About 226 lawmakers
have co-sponsored the bill, and it is likely to pass if put to a vote.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has indicated she will move it – possibly
by Thanksgiving – despite unprecedented pressure from the Bush
administration, Turkish officials and many foreign-policy leaders,
including all eight living former secretaries of state.

In 2005, the same measure passed the committee by a wider margin, but
then-Republican leadership blocked it from coming to the House floor.

Lobbying intense

This year several lawmakers, including Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.,
and Florida Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the leading Republican on the
panel, changed their votes to oppose the measure.

"Part of the reason the fight was so intense this year is because the
Turkish lobby knew that (former House Speaker) Dennis Hastert would
never let it go to the floor," said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Pasadena, the
bill’s chief sponsor, who is no longer on the panel. "I was lobbying
members right up until the moment of the vote."

Every California lawmaker on the committee voted in favor of the
resolution, including Reps. Howard Berman, D-Van Nuys; Linda Sanchez,
D-Lakewood; Diane Watson, D-Los Angeles; Elton Gallegly, R-Thousand
Oaks; Ed Royce, R-Fullerton; Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach/Long
Beach; and Brad Sherman, D-Sherman Oaks.

L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa hailed the committee vote and condemned
President George W. Bush for urging Congress to reject it.

"We must never – for any reason – seek to clothe the horror of ethnic
cleansing in bureaucratic euphemisms," Villaraigosa said in a written
statement.

Armenian activists and most historians maintain that 1.5 million
Armenians were deported en masse from their homes in what is now
modern-day Turkey and slaughtered, and their property was confiscated,
as part of a systematic genocide.

Label offends Turks

Turkey acknowledges atrocities were committed in the bloody aftermath
of World War I, but strongly opposes the genocide label.

Turkish officials say about 300,000 Armenians were killed when they
joined forces with French and Russian soldiers to take up arms against
Turks. No lawmakers made that argument Wednesday, however.

Even those who voted against the resolution flatly declared that the
historical facts point to genocide, but said they were voting based
on America’s national security interests.

"There was indeed a genocide of the Armenians, and it will not be
forgotten," said Rep. Michael Pence, R-Indiana, who called his vote
against the resolution "gut-wrenching."

Invoking the biblical saying that to everything there is a season,
Pence said Congress should not vote on the bill while U.S. troops
are at war in Iraq. "This is a season that calls for standing with
our troops first," he said.

Rep. Dan Burton, R-Indiana, took the strongest stand against the
resolution and noted that 70 percent of supplies to U.S. troops
currently travel through Turkey.

"The stability of the entire Middle East could be at risk," he
warned. "Why are we kicking the one ally that is helping us in
the face?"

Turkey has raised the possibility of blocking U.S. access to airfields
and roads if Congress passes the resolution.

Pressure in Turkey

Egemen Bagis, a member of the Turkish Parliament who attended the
hearing, predicted that Turkish lawmakers would face intense political
pressure from their own constituents to retaliate.

"No political party can ignore the public pressure. Turkey will have
to show a reaction," he said.

But the open threats also angered a number of lawmakers, particularly
Californians who said they favor calling Turkey’s bluff.

Rohrabacher said he was angry at "the audacity that some Turks have
to threaten to cut logistics to U.S. troops."

"Isn’t it enough that hundreds of our service members may have died
because of Turkey’s refusal to enter Iraq (in 2003)?" he said.

Sherman, who helped Schiff lead the fight for the bill, pointed out
that the U.S. annually argues for Turkey to gain full membership in
the European Union.

Sherman also noted that in 2003, the U.S. gave Turkey $3 billion,
which the nation leveraged into $8 billion in loan guarantees.

"We cannot provide genocide denial as one of the perks of friendship
with the United States," he said.

Others likened Wednesday’s vote to one earlier this year urging the
Japanese government to apologize for the abuse of "comfort women"
held as sex slaves during World War II.

The Japanese government fought hard against the bill’s passage and
threatened diplomatic retaliation, which lawmakers said has yet
to materialize.

Assemblyman Paul Krekorian, D-Glendale, said there is a direct
connection between Armenian genocide early in the 20th century and
the genocide today in Darfur.

"When we fail to appropriately respond with condemnation and punishment
of those committing genocide we invite the opportunity for future
genocide," he said. "House Resolution 106 is not about the Armenian
community but about whether America will continue to represent a
beacon of justice in the world."

For Dr. Armine Hacopian, a member of the Glendale Community College
Board of Trustees, the resolution strikes close to home.

"My father was orphaned when both of his parents were slaughtered in
front of him at the age of 6," said Hacopian. "It impacted his life and
my family’s life. He is no longer alive, and it’s a shame that a lot of
survivors have passed away and have not lived to see this justice done.

"It’s important that this be recognized because when you recognize
genocide, it keeps it from repeating itself. We have to take a
moral stand."

In the end, many lawmakers acknowledged that Wednesday’s vote was an
emotional one.

Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., pointed to a handful of survivors, some
more than 100 years old, waiting to hear the panel’s verdict on
their history.

"What time can they come back?" Ackerman asked, adding, "Truth never
goes out of season."

Crowley Hails Committee Approval Of Armenian Genocide Resolution

CROWLEY HAILS COMMITTEE APPROVAL OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION

EmpireStateNews.net, New York
Oct 11 2007

Washington — US Congressman Joseph Crowley (D-NY), a member of the
House Committee on Foreign Affairs, commended his colleagues on the
panel for approving the Affirmation of the United States Record on
the Armenian Genocide Resolution. The legislation cleared committee
by a vote of 27 to 21.

"The world must never forget the genocide that occurred against
Armenians 92 years ago," Crowley said. "Today, the House Committee on
Foreign Affairs voted – with my support – to ensure that we never do.

By passing this resolution, we are finally officially recognizing
this heinous chapter in our world history and condemning the murder
of 1.5 million innocent."

Crowley, a co-sponsor of this resolution, has called for official
condemnation of the annihilation of 1.5 million Armenians that began
on April 24, 1915 and for recognition that the tragic killings were
genocide.

Film Backing House Resolution No. 106

FILM BACKING HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 106

Panorama.am
18:09 10/10/2007

The Armenian-American Congress presented a film about the Armenian
Genocide and House Resolution No. 106 in the House of Representatives.

As the Congress reports, the Turkish government continues to send
delegations of deniers to the US with the purpose of presenting
their viewpoint in the halls of Congress. According to members
of the Armenian Congress, Armenians need to make the voice of
truth heard. For that reason, the Armenian Congress produced the
film, which proves the authenticity of the Armenian Genocide. In
any event, the committee session can be seen on the Internet, at
(American time 1:30 p.m.) and by
pressing "live webcast".

We remind that discussion about Resolution No. 106 will take place
today in the US House of Representatives (Armenian time, 10:30
p.m.). We point out that the Armenian-American Congress, in Washington,
is one of the largest such Armenian national organizations, which
seeks to present the Armenian Cause in a just and correct manner.

http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/

RA President And CoE Commissioner Discussed Human Rights In Republic

RA PRESIDENT AND COE COMMISSIONER DISCUSSED HUMAN RIGHTS IN REPUBLIC

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.10.2007 17:36 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian President Robert Kocharian received today
Council of Europe’s Commission for Human Rights, Mr Thomas Hammarberg,
the RA leader’s press office reported.

The parties discussed reforms in the juridical system as a guarantee
for human rights protection in the republic.

They also referred to activities of the institute of human rights
defender.