Weapons Used to Convince Armenia

Kommersant, Russia
March 24 2006

Weapons Used to Convince Armenia

// Russia compensates for its expensive natural gas with cheap arms
Friendship of the Nations

A week before Gazprom is set to increase the price of natural gas for
Armenia, Yerevan has announced significant progress in negotiations.
According to Armenian Defense Minister Serge Sarkisyan, the public
and industry will both receive gas at lower prices than stated
earlier. The price that left Yerevan gasping in horror at the end of
last year – $110 per 1000 cu. m. – has not changed. Kommersant has
learned that the difference lies in a plan proposed by Moscow to
provide a valuable bonus with its expensive gas – the latest Russian
weaponry at rock-bottom prices.
Gas for Property

Although here is only a week left until Russia and Armenia convert to
a new billing system for natural gas, the situation remains far from
clear. On Wednesday evening, Armenian Prime Minister Andranik
Margaryan announced that the price would not change. `The price of
$110 fixed in the bilateral agreement is final, and no change in it
is expected,’ he said, adding that they were still discussing
possible forms of compensation. That much had been known since the
beginning of the year, when Moscow and Yerevan began their search for
a mutually acceptable decision.

When deputy head of Gazprom Alexander Medvedev announced that the
price of gas that Russia will supply to the Transcaucasus will be
$110 per 1000 cu. m. in 2006, Moscow made it clear that that figure
was firm. Medvedev noted in particular that political alliances would
not play any role in the changing price. Moscow did, however, say
that it would consider forms of compensation for the raising price of
gas that would lighten the blow for Armenian consumers.

Moscow expressed interest in buying a large package of shares in
Armrosgazprom. Russia intended the proceeds from that sale to support
low gas prices for the domestic consumer. Russia also proposed buying
all five generating blocks of the Razdan electric plant and the
country’s entire gas transport system. Russian specialists estimated
the value of those objects at $140 million.

Those ideas came to naught thanks to Russia’s `sworn partner’ Iran.
Armenia is giving that country its gas pipeline and one of the Razdan
generating blocks. When the Islamic Republic found our about Russia’s
proposal, it was strongly opposed to it and threatened to undermine
the deal. Armenia was forced to give in to Iran’s ultimatum.

The Search for a Solution

Armenian President Robert Kocharyan visited Moscow in January. His
meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin did not bring results
in gas negotiations, however. `Considering the strategic character of
our relationship with Russia, we were counting on settling the
question of the price of Russian gas more simply and without such
long negotiations,’ the Armenian president’s press secretary Viktor
Sogomonyan commented at the end of the president’s trip.

For the first time in Russian-Armenian relations, he almost made a
veiled threat to Russia. `What concerns us most in the developing
situation is that public opinion in Armenia can hardly be interpreted
as favorable to Russia. We are concerned that that mood may play a
role in the long-term perspective,’ Sogomonyan said.

After that, Armenian politicians formed two camps. Speaker of the
parliament Artur Bagdasaryan stated that, although he remains in
favor of the development of Armenian-Russian strategic relations, he
considered it necessary to `specify their framework.’ Deputy speaker
of parliament and Dashnaktsutyun Party leader Vagan Oganesyan noted
that the `empirically pro-Russian mood’ of the Armenian public would
take on a more pragmatic character after the rise in the price of
Russian gas.

The press began to opine that there was no need for Armenia to ask
continually for lenience from Russia. Yerevan, journalists said,
should look at the example of its neighbors Georgia and Azerbaijan,
which accepted the price hike silently. `At least that gives us the
freedom of political maneuvering,’ one publication noted.

The Armenian government tried not to go to extremes. Defense Minister
Sarkisyan rejected suggestions that the country begin demanding
rental payments for the Russian military base in Armenia. `The price
of Russian gas is in no way related to our security. The Russian
military base was located there at the request of the Armenian
government. It is one of the components of our security and we still
feel the need for that base,’ he said.

Russia made no concessions. In February, while visiting Switzerland,
Kocharyan stated that he still did not know what the price of Russian
gas for Armenia would be after April 1. He noted that negotiations
were continuing on `mechanisms of compensation’ that would reduce the
consequences of the price increase and `could function for two or
three years.’

While the negotiations were going on, the Armrosgazprom company, as
required by Armenian law, applied to the commission on public
utilities regulation to raise the domestic price for natural gas.
They said in the company that they had nothing else to do, since
there had a contract dated December 28, 2005, where it was clearly
written that the new price for gas would be $110. The commission
ruled that, beginning on April 10, the Armenian public would pay 90
drams (about $0.20) per cubic meter, up from 59 drams. Industrial
consumers would pay $146.51 per 1000 cu. m., up from $79.10.

Guns for Gas

Only late Wednesday evening did the Armenian public find out news
from the gas negotiations. `On the instructions of the president of
Armenia, I have sent a letter to the head of Gazprom Mr. Miller with
a number of proposals. On Friday, we received an answer from Miller.
Gazprom is prepared to sign documents before the end of April that
will make it possible for the Armenian public and industry to pay a
lower price than had been suggested earlier,’ Sarkisyan, one of
Armenia’s most influential politicians, stated. He expressed hope
that the rising price would not have a great impact on the public and
industry. He did not hide the fact Gazprom was not conceding on its
$110 price. Kommersant has learned the details of the scheme that is
to save the Russian-Armenian alliance.

According to information obtained by the newspaper, the saving
mechanism was worked out in Moscow. Yerevan will receive a bonus that
will be almost more valuable than the main product. Supplies of
modern Russian weaponry will be made to Armenia at reduced prices.
Part of the contracts will be completely free.

That mechanism is fully acceptable to Armenia. It will allow Yerevan
to use money set aside for armaments as compensation to hold gas
prices, if not at their previous levels, at levels close to the
previous ones. Russia is also expecting to benefit from the scheme.
According to Kommersant’s information, Kremlin analysts are
predicting that the appearance of a large quantity of modern weapons
in Armenia will pique the interest of Azerbaijan. Baku may try to
undermine the deal at first, but it will understand soon enough that
Moscow will stand up for its own interests and then it will make
similar purchases to remain on parity with Armenia. In Moscow, they
are already painting rosy pictures of the future of the military
industrial complex. The dangers of an arms race in such an unstable
region are not being mentioned.

by Ara Tatevosyan, Yerevan; Alexander Reutov

United States Interested In Defense Of Borders Of Armenia

UNITED STATES INTERESTED IN DEFENSE OF BORDERS OF ARMENIA

Lragir/am
22 March 06

Greater effectiveness of defense of borders of Armenia is in the
interests of the international community. The news agency ARKA informs
that this was stated by the U.S. Ambassador to Armenia John Evans. The
entire world should be interested in preventing the proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction, and effective defense of borders of
any country is the best means of prevention, said John Evans. He took
part in the opening ceremony of the Training Center of Border Troops
of Armenia in Yerevan. Ambassador Evans stated that his country had
assisted Armenia in the defense of borders. He mentioned that for a
country like Armenia defense of borders is of prime importance.

BAKU: The EU And Conflict Resolution In The South Caucasus

THE EU AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS

Today, Azerbaijan
URL:
March 21 2006

/

To guarantee its own security, the EU must become more engaged in
resolving the conflicts in the South Caucasus lest they ignite into
full-fledged wars in Europe’s neighbourhood.

“Conflict Resolution in the South Caucasus: The EU’s Role”, the latest
report from the International Crisis Group, examines the EU’s efforts
to address tensions over Nagorno Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia,
and points out how the EU can do more.

“Greater engagement is a challenge Brussels has only just begun
to address”, says Sabine Freizer, Crisis Group’s Caucasus Project
Director. “There have been a few promising steps, but there is a long
way to go”.

Thus far, others have taken the lead in promoting conflict settlement
in the region, but over a decade of negotiations led by the UN in
Abkhazia, and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE) in Nagorno Karabakh and South Ossetia, have not produced
comprehensive peace agreements. With its reputation as an “honest
broker”, access to a range of soft and hard power tools, and the lure
of greater integration into Europe, the EU has a greater role to play,
and offers added value to compliment the UN and the OSCE.

To avoid instability on its borders, the EU seeks a ring of
well-governed countries around it. It is further interested in the
South Caucasus to ensure access to Caspian oil and gas, develop
transport and communication corridors between Europe and Asia, and
contain such threats as smuggling, trafficking and environmental
degradation.

As the EU is unlikely to offer membership to Georgia, Armenia and
Azerbaijan any time soon, it must identify innovative means to
impose conditionality on its aid and exercise influence. European
Neighbourhood Policy Action Plans are being finalised. These offer
a chance for the EU to enhance its role especially if the peaceful
resolution of the conflicts are defined as commitments.

The new EU Special Representative should observe ongoing negotiations
for the Abkhazian, South Ossetian and Nagorno-Karabakh conflicts. The
Commission has allocated significant funding to rehabilitation in
South Ossetia and Abkhazia. It should assess how it can start doing
more in and around Nagorno Karabakh.

“The EU is trying to define its role in a new neighbourhood which is
neither at war nor at peace”, says Nicholas Whyte, Director of Crisis
Group’s Europe Program. “If the EU fails to implement its strategic
vision for a secure neighbourhood, its credibility in the region, and
generally vis-a-vis Russia and the U.S., will suffer. More troublingly,
if the South Caucasus conflicts continue to deteriorate, the EU may
find itself unprepared for responding to wars among its neighbours”.

http://www.today.az/news/politics/24285.html
www.crisisgroup.org/

BAKU: EU Interest in Resolving Conflicts in South Caucasus Increased

EU Interest in Resolving Conflicts in South Caucasus Increased

Baku Today, Azerbaijan
March 18 2006

18/03/2006 19:56

The European Union (EU) appointed a new special representative for
the South Caucasus and made changes to the mandate for this position,
Peter Semnebi, the EU’s new special representative for South Caucasus
told journalists in Baku.

Changes in the mandate provide for more attention to be paid to the
settlement of the frozen conflicts. Regarding Karabakh, the EU is
going to support mechanisms of settlement if a political resolution is
obtained. According to Semnebi, the EU can send observers to conduct
peacekeeping operations, and provide assistance for the rehabilitation
of territories which suffered as a result of the war.

Semnebi said the EU could provide peacekeeping operations both
independently and in coalition with other international structures.

Contrary to the previous special representative Heyke Talvitiye,
whose office was in Finland, Semnebi is working in Brussels. This
will allow him to “more closely and better coordinate the activity
of European structures”.

Semnebi talked about the significant rise of EU’s interest in the
South Caucasus and said that this is connected with the “expansion of
Europe’s borders to the region”. According to him, after confirmation
of the plan of action for the European Neighborhood Project, relations
between the EU and South Caucasus will be strengthened.

Responding to the questions of journalists, Semnebi confirmed that
in Baku he discussed the re- run elections for parliament. The EU
will very attentively follow this process and give assessment on
the matter. Democracy and human rights are the EU’s main principles
of cooperation.”Europe’s experience shows that cooperation can be
successful if it is based on common values. For Europe, these common
values are democracy and human rights,” Semnebi said.

Responding the question about what the EU’s reaction would be in
the case of a threat to the countries of the region by southern or
northern neighbors, Semnebi said it is difficult to say beforehand.

This is Semnebi’s first visit to the region. In Baku he met with the
Azerbaijan’s leadership and opposition leaders, as well as with the
representatives of international organizations.

First Heating Technologies Exhibition Is To Open In Yerevan On March

FIRST HEATING TECHNOLOGIES EXHIBITION IS TO OPEN IN YEREVAN ON MARCH 15, 2006

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
March 15, 2006

YEREVAN, March 15. /ARKA/. The first heating technologies exhibition is
to open in Yerevan on March 15, 2006, according to the press release
received Tuesday by ARKA News Agency from Government-affiliated
Renewable Energy Fund. Armenia heating companies, banks and
representatives of local self-governing bodies will take part in the
event aimed at informing the community about heating technologies
and establishing business ties between all participants of the
market – companies, banks, credit organizations, donors and city
authorities. These ties establishment will lay due groundwork for
establishing relations with Armenian and foreign potential investors
and customers, the press release says.

Armenian Renewable Energy Fund intends to provide credits to potential
heating suppliers through commercial banks and to modernize this area.

The exhibition is organized by the Fund as part of WB-financed program
focused on city heating as well as by the USAID.

Daniel Fried Has Meetings With RA President,Defence And Foreign Mini

DANIEL FRIED HAS MEETINGS WITH RA PRESIDENT, DEFENCE AND FOREIGN MINISTERS, HEADS OF PARTIES

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Mar 16 2006

YEREVAN, MARCH 16, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. Assistant Secretary
for European and Eurasian Affairs Daniel Fried, accompanied by Senior
Advisor for Eurasia Steven Mann, visited Armenia March 15-16 as part of
regional travel. Assistant Secretary Fried traveled to Azerbaijan and
Georgia March 13-15, and will depart for Ankara, Turkey on March 16.

According to the official information submitted to Noyan Tapan
by the Public Ties Department of the U.S. Embassy to Armenia, in
Armenia, Assistant Secretary Fried held meetings with President
Robert Kocharian, Minister of Defense Serzh Sargsian, Minister of
Foreign Affairs Vartan Oskanian, and political leaders from the full
spectrum of local political parties. A number of issues were discussed
during the meetings, including the U.S.-Armenian bilateral relations,
democracy, and Nagorno-Karabakh.

This trip was Ambassador Fried’s second visit to Armenia since his
appointment as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian
Affairs in May 2005. Prior to this position, Ambassador Fried served
as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for European
and Eurasian Affairs at the National Security Council.

Kenya: Raila: ODM To Spill More Beans On The Armenians

RAILA: ODM TO SPILL MORE BEANS ON THE ARMENIANS

Daily Nation, Kenya
March 15 2006

Lang’ata MP Raila Odinga yesterday evening recorded another statement
with police over his claim that the two Armenians currently in the
country are mercenaries.

And he declared that the Orange Democratic Movement would today tell
Kenyans more about the Armenians’ activities and their link to the
Government.

The former Roads minister, who first raised the issue of the
foreigners, said he had gone to give more “urgent information” to an
investigating officer on behalf of the movement.

And he accused the Government of helping the foreigners to concoct
untruths that they had bribed him.

The MP said: “This (lie) is something being concocted by themselves
and the Government.”

In another development, sources said that following Mwingi North MP
Kalonzo Musyoka’s questioning yesterday, police had been asked to go
“slow” on the matter.

The instructions were given as Mr Odinga went to the Kilimani police
station to give what he called “additional, crucial and urgent”
information about the alleged mercenaries.

Mr Odinga was accompanied by his lawyer, Mr Kenneth Marende, who is
also the MP for Emuhaya, during the two and half hours he spent with
the police.

With him were MPs Orwa Ojodeh, Reuben Ndolo and William Omondi.

Mr Odinga, who walked out of the CID office at 7.30pm, said: “We felt
the information that we have is crucially urgent and needed immediate
attention.” He said he had decided to give the police additional
information which, he noted, he had received in the last few days.

Sources said the Liberal Democratic Party leader gave the officers
information on vehicles the Armenian brothers – Artur Sargsyan and
Artur Margaryan – were using and the link they had with powerful
people in the Kibaki Government.

He was also said to have clarified some issues in his first statement.

The Lang’ata MP said that the fact that the foreigners could “concoct
untruths” about him showed that they were up to no good.

“The fact that these characters can concoct statements shows how
dangerous they are,” he said.

“I do not know these characters.”

He maintained that he did not know the two foreigners and dismissed
as rubbish the claim that they had given him Sh108 million in Kenya
and an additional Sh100,000 in Dubai.

Mr Sargsyan and Mr Margaryan have denied being mercenaries, saying
that they are businessmen who are being framed by Mr Odinga so that
he may not pay back the money.

Mr Odinga said he would take legal action against Environment minister
Kivutha Kibwana over his remarks over his link with mercenaries.

He said Prof Kibwana had shown that he (Kibwana) was “an apologist
of one of the most heinous governments” the country had ever had.

After a government of national unity meeting on Tuesday, Prof Kibwana
accused Mr Odinga of acting with impunity by saying that he knew the
presence of mercenaries in the country.

Prof Kibwana questioned how Mr Odinga knew the whereabouts of the
two foreigners if he did not have an intelligence network of his own.

Future Of South Caucasus – Settlement Of All Conflicts

FUTURE OF SOUTH CAUCASUS – SETTLEMENT OF ALL CONFLICTS

PanARMENIAN.Net
16.03.2006 20:29 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ During the visit to the countries of the South
Caucasus three basic topics were discussed: prospects of the Karabakh
peace process, energy security and the future of the region, US
Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs
Daniel Fried stated during a news conference at the US Embassy in
Yerevan. “Speaking of the future of the South Caucasus, I mean the
time, when all conflicts – Nagorno Karabakh, Abkhazian and South
Ossetian are settled, the countries live in peace and choose their
place in this world without any external pressure,” Fried remarked. In
his words, the dialogue with Armenian FM V. Oskanian will continue
in Washington – during the ceremony of signing an agreement between
Armenian Government and the Millennium Challenge Corporation March
27, 2006.

Armenia Fund Reconstructs Artik Hospital

Armenia Fund, Inc.
111 North Jackson St. Ste. 205
Glendale, CA 91206

T | 818-243-6222
F | 818-243-7222
E | [email protected]

For Immediate Release
March 13, 2006

Armenia Fund Reconstructs Artik Hospital
United Kingdom Affiliate Finances Project

Yerevan, Armenia – Armenia Fund is proud to announce that it has
embarked on yet another vital hospital reconstruction project in
the Shirak Region of the Republic of Armenia. The Artik Hospital
will undergo major renovation in order to meet the growing needs of
the region.

Presently, the project is in its design stage. The scope of the
reconstruction will include strengthening of the building and its
foundation, construction of a boiler-house, installation of a modern
heating system, as well as installation of new doors and windows. The
hospital will also undergo crucial seismic retrofitting in order
to prevent collapse in case of an earthquake. In addition to key
structural upgrades, new restroom facilities will be built, as well as
new flooring will be installed throughout the facility. Part of the
new plan will encompass a new electrical conduit system, as well as
safe and reliable wiring throughout the building. Upon completion,
the hospital will have a new and separate sewerage system. The
surrounding landscape of the hospital will be redesigned in order to
be more people friendly.

After a close assessment of the hospital, healthcare specialists
determined that the condition of the hospital is critically
deteriorating. Construction experts revealed major structural damages,
due to a lack of repair and maintenance over the years.

Over the past twenty years, the hospital has been moderately renovated.
Unfortunately, the catastrophic earthquake of 1988 crippled the
hospital’s structural support and foundation lines. Currently, only
one building out of the four is being used for patient services.

The hospital currently has 40 beds and serves as the main healthcare
facility for the town of Artik. Due to a lack of readily available
healthcare facilities, the hospital has come to cater to the Shirak
region’s growing 60,000 population. Armenia Fund plans to expand
patient capacity as soon as reconstruction works are completed.

Armenia Fund, Inc., is a non-profit 501(c)(3) tax-exempt corporation
established in 1994 to facilitate large-scale humanitarian and
infrastructure development assistance to Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh.
Armenia Fund, Inc. is the U.S. Western Region affiliate of “Hayastan”
All-Armenian Fund. Tax ID# 95-4485698

www.armeniafund.org

Roman Ruler’s Head Found In Sewer

ROMAN RULER’S HEAD FOUND IN SEWER

The Seoul Times, South Korea
Oct 18 2005

Life of “Saint Constantine” Who Cristianized Rome

Head statue of The Holy Emperor Constantine

A 1,700-year-old carved marble head of Emperor Constantine has been
found in a sewer in central Rome.

Archaeologists found the 60cm (2ft) head while clearing an ancient
drainage system in the ruins of the Roman Forum.

Eugenio La Rocca, superintendent of Rome’s artefacts, described the
head as a rare find and said it was possible it had been used to
clear a blocked sewer.

Constantine, who reigned from 306 to 337, is known for ending
persecution of Christians and founding Constantinople.

Although most of his subjects remained pagans, he is credited with
helping to establish Europe’s Christian roots by proclaiming religious
freedom.

The white marble head was confirmed as a portrait of Constantine by
experts who compared it with coins and two other giant heads kept in
Rome’s Capitoline Museums.

Probably carved between 312 and 325 AD, when Constantine was at the
height of his power, it may have belonged to a statue of the emperor
in full armour.

“Recovering a portrait of this size and in this state of conservation
in the very heart of the city is really extraordinary,” said Mr
La Rocca.

“We have concluded that the head did not fall by accident into the
passage, but was put there on purpose.

“It could have been used as a big piece of stone to divert water from
the drain, or it could have been put there to symbolise the resentment
of a pagan people for their Christian emperor.”

The head’s unceremonious insertion in the drain may have saved it
from the plundering of the Forum after the fall of the Roman empire
in the 5th Century.

It is expected to go on display in Rome’s museums after a brief period
of restoration.

Life of Contantine the Great

‘Constantine the Great’ ‘Saint Constantine’ Flavius Valerius
Constantinus (AD ca. 285 – AD 337)

Statue of The Holy Emperor Constantine

Constantine was born in Naissus, Upper Moesia, on 27 February in
roughly AD 285. Another account places the year at about AD 272 or 273.

He was the son of Helena, an inn keeper’s daughter, and Constantius
Chlorus. It is unclear if the two were married and so Constantine
may well have been an illegitimate child.

When in Constantius Chlorus in AD 293 was elevated to the rank of
Caesar, Constantine became a member of the court of Diocletian.

Constantine proved an officer of much promise when serving under
Diocletian’s Caesar Galerius against the Persians.

He was still with Galerius when Diocletian and Maximian abdicated
in AD 305, finding himself in the precarious situation of a virtual
hostage to Galerius.

In AD 306 though Galerius, now sure of his position as dominant
Augustus (despite Constantius being senior by rank) let Constantine
return to his father to accompany him on a campaign to Britain.

Constantine however was that suspicious of this sudden change of
heart by Galerius, that he took extensive precautions on his journey
to Britain.

When Constantius Chlorus in AD 306 died of illness at Ebucarum (York),
the troops hailed Constantine as the new Augustus.

Galerius refused to accept this proclamation but, faced with
strong support for Constantius’ son, he saw himself forced to grant
Constantine the rank of Caesar.

Though when Constantine married Fausta, her father Maximian, now
returned to power in Rome, acknowledged him as Augustus. Hence, when
Maximian and Maxentius later became enemies, Maximian was granted
shelter at Constantine’s court.

At the Conference of Carnuntum in AD 308, where all the Caesars and
Augusti met, it was demanded that Constantine give up his title of
Augustus and return to being a Caesar. However, he refused.

“Constantine the Great,” The Holy Emperor Constantine

Not long after the famous conference, Constantine was successfully
campaigning against marauding Germans when news reached him that
Maximian, still residing at his court, had turned against him. Had
Maximian been forced abdicate at the Conference of Carnuntum,
then he now was making yet another bid for power, seeking to usurp
Constantine’s throne.

Denying Maximian any time to organise his defence, Constantine
immediately marched his legions into Gaul. All Maximian could do
was flee to Massilia. Constantine did not relent and laid siege to
the city. The garrison of Massilia surrendered and Maximian either
committed suicide or was executed (AD 310).

With Galerius dead in AD 311 the main authority amongst the emperors
had been removed, leaving them to struggle for dominance.

In the east Licinius and Maximinus Daia fought for supremacy and in
the west Constantine began a war with Maxentius. In AD 312 Constantine
invaded Italy. Maxentius is believed to have had up to four times as
many troops, though they were inexperinced and undisciplined.

Brushing aside the opposition in battles at Augusta Taurinorum (Turin)
and Verona, Constantine marched on Rome.

Constantine later claimed to have had a vision on the way to Rome,
during the night before battle. In this dream he supposedly saw the
‘Chi-Ro’, the symbol of Christ, shining above the sun. Seeing this
as a divine sign, it is said that Constantine had his soldiers paint
the symbol on their shields. Following this Constantine went on to
defeat the numerically stronger army of Maxentius at the Battle at
the Milvian Bridge (Oct AD 312).

Constantine’s opponent Maxentius, together with thousands of his
soldiers, drowned as the bridge of boats his force was retreating
over collapsed.

Constantine saw this victory as directly related to the vision he
had had the night before.

Henceforth Constantine saw himself as an ’emperor of the Christian
people.’ If this made him a Christian is the subject of some debate.

But Constantine, who only had himself baptized on his deathbed, is
generally understood as the first Christian emperor of the Roman world.

With his victory over Maxentius at the Milvian Bridge, Constantine
became the dominant figure in the empire. The senate warmly welcomed
him to Rome and the two remaining emperors, Licinius and Maximinus II
Daia could do little else but agree to his demand that he henceforth
should be the senior Augustus. It was in this senior position that
Constantine ordered Maximinus II Daia to cease his repression of
the Christians.

Though despite this turn toward Christianity, Constantine remained
for some years still very tolerant of the old pagan religions.

Particularly the worship of the sun god was still closely related with
him for some time to come. A fact which can be seen on the carvings
of his triumphal Arch in Rome and on coins minted during his reign.

Then in AD 313 Licinius defeated Maximinus II Daia. This left only
two emperors.

At first both tried to live peacefully aside each other, Constantine
in the west, Licinius in the east. In AD 313 they met at Mediolanum
(Milan), where Licinius even married Constantine’s sister Constantia
and restated that Constantine was the senior Augustus. Yet it was made
clear that Licinius would make his own laws in the east, without the
need to consult Constantine. Further it was agreed that Licinius would
return property to the Christian church which had been confiscated
in the eastern provinces.

As time went on Constantine should become ever more involved with the
Christian church. He appeared at first to have very little grasp of
the basic beliefs governing Christian faith. But gradually he must
have become more acquainted with them. So much so that he sought to
resolve theological disputes among the church itself.

In this role he summoned the bishops of the western provinces to
Arelate (Arles) in AD 314, after the so-called Donatist schism had
split the church in Africa. If this willingness to resolve matters
through peaceful debate showed one side of Constantine, then his brutal
enforcement of the decisions reached at such meetings showed the
other. Following the decision of the council of bishops at Arelate,
donatist churches were confiscated and the followers of this branch
of Christianity were brutally repressed. Evidently Constantine was
also capable of persecuting Christians, if they were deemed to be the
‘wrong type of Christians.’

Problems with Licinius arose when Constantine appointed his
brother-in-law Bassianus as Caesar for Italy and the Danubian
provinces. If the principle of the tetrarchy, established by
Diocletian, still in theory defined government, then Constantine
as senior Augustus had the right to do this. And yet, Diocletian’s
principle’s would have demanded that he appointed an independent man
on merit.

But Licinius saw in Bassianus little else than a puppet of
Constantine. If the Italian territories were Constantine’s, then
the important Danubian military provinces were under the control of
Licinius. If Bassianus was indeed Constantine’s puppet it would have
ment a serious gain of power by Constantine. And so, to prevent his
opponent from yet further increasing his power, Licinius managed to
persuade Bassianus to revolt against Constantine in AD 314 or AD 315.

The rebellion was easily put down, but the involvement of Licinius,
too, was discovered. And this discovery made war inevitable. But
considering the situation responsibility for the war, must lie with
Constantine. It appears that he was simply unwilling to share power
and hence sought to find means by which to bring about a fight.

For a while neither side acted, instead both camps preferred to
prepare for the contest ahead. Then in AD 316 Constantine attacked
with his forces. In July or August at Cibalae in Pannonia he defeated
Licinius larger army, forcing his opponent to retreat.

The next step was taken by Licinius, when he announced Aurelius
Valerius Valens, to be the new emperor of the west. It was an attempt
to undermine Constantine, but it clearly failed to work. Soon after,
another battle followed, at Campus Ardiensis in Thrace. This time
however, neither side gained victory, as the battle proved indecisive.

Once more the two sides reached a treaty (1 March AD 317). Licinius
surrendered all Danubian and Balkan provinces, with the exception of
Thrace, to Constantine. In effect this was little else but confirmation
of the actual balance of power, as Constantine had indeed conquered
these territories and controlled them. Despite his weaker position,
Licinius though still retained complete sovereignty over his remaining
eastern dominions. Also as part of the treaty, Licinius’ alternative
western Augustus was put to death.

The final part of this agreement reached at Serdica was the creation
of three new Caesars. Crispus and Constantine II were both sons
of Constantine, and Licinius the Younger was the infant son of the
eastern emperor and his wife Constantia.

For a short while the empire should enjoy peace. But soon the situation
began to deteriorate again. If Constantine acted more and more in
favour of the Christians, then Licinius began to disagree.

>>From AD 320 onwards Licinius began to suppress the Christian church
in his eastern provinces and also began ejecting any Christians from
government posts.

Another problem arose regarding the consulships. These were by now
widely understood as positions in which emperors would groom their
sons as future rulers. Their treaty at Serdica had hence proposed
that appointments should be made by mutual agreement. Licinius
though believed Constantine favoured his own sons when granting
these positions.

And so, in clear defiance of their agreements, Licinius appointed
himself and his two sons consuls for the eastern provinces for the
year AD 322.

With this declaration it was clear that hostilities between the two
sides would soon begin afresh. Both sides began to prepare for the
struggle ahead.

In AD 323 Constantine created yet another Caesar by elevating his
third son Constantius II to this rank.

If the eastern and western halves of the empire were hostile towards
one another, then in AD 323 a reason was soon found to start a new
civil war. Constantine, while campaigning against Gothic invaders,
strayed into Licinius’ Thracian territory.

It is well possible he did so on purposely in order to provoke a war.

Be that as it may, Licinius took this as the reason to declare war
in spring AD 324.

But it was once again Constantine who moved to attack first in AD 324
with 120’000 infantry and 10’000 cavalry against Licinius’ 150’000
infantry and 15’000 cavalry based at Hadrianopolis. On 3 July AD 324
he severely defeated Licinius’ forces at Hadrianopolis and shortly
after his fleet won victories at sea.

Licinius fled across the Bosporus to Asia Minor (Turkey), but
Constantine having brought with him a fleet of two thousand transport
vessels ferried his army across the water and forced the decisive
battle of Chrysopolis where he utterly defeated Licinius (18 September
AD 324).

Licinius was imprisoned and later executed.

Alas Constantine was sole emperor of the entire Roman world.

Soon after his victory in AD 324 he outlawed pagan sacrifices, now
feeling far more at liberty to enforce his new religious policy. The
treasures of pagan temples were confiscated and used to pay for
the construction of new Christian churches. Gladiatorial contests
were outruled and harsh new laws were issued prohibiting sexual
immorality. Jews in particular were forbidden from owning Christian
slaves.

Constantine continued the reorganization of the army, begun by
Diocletian, re-affirming the difference between frontier garrisons
and mobile forces. The mobile forces consisting largely of heavy
cavalry which could quickly move to trouble spots. The presence of
Germans continued to increase during his reign.

The praetorian guard who’d held such influence over the empire for
so long, was finally disbanded. Their place was taken by the mounted
guard, largely consisting of Germans, which had been introduced
under Diocletian.

As a law maker Constantine was terribly severe.

Edicts were passed by which the sons were forced to take up the
professions of their fathers. Not only was this terribly harsh on
such sons who sought a different career. But by making the recruitment
of veteran’s sons compulsory, and enforcing it ruthlessly with harsh
penalties, widespread fear and hatred was caused.

Also his taxation reforms created extreme hardship. City dwellers were
obliged to pay a tax in gold or silver, the chrysargyron. This tax was
levied every four years, beating and torture being the consequences
for those to poor to pay. Parents are said to have sold their daughters
into prostitution in order to pay the chrysargyron.

Under Constantine, any girl who ran away with her lover was burned
alive. Any chaperone who should assist in such a matter had molten
lead poured into her mouth. Rapists were burned at the stake.

But also their women victims were punished, if they had been raped
away from home, as they, according to Constantine, should have no
business outside the safety of their own homes.

But Constantine is perhaps most famous for the great city which came
to bear his name – Constantinople.

He came to the conclusion that Rome had ceased to be a practical
capital for the empire from which the emperor could exact effective
control over its frontiers.

For a while he set up court in different places; Treviri (Trier),
Arelate (Arles), Mediolanum (Milan), Ticinum, Sirmium and Serdica
(Sofia). Then he decided on the ancient Greek city of Byzantium. And
on 8 November AD 324 Constantine created his new capital there,
renaming it Constantinopolis (City of Constantine).

He was careful to maintain Rome’s ancient privileges, and the new
senate founded in Constantinople was of a lower rank, but he clearly
intended it to be the new center of the Roman world. Measures to
encourage its growth were introduced, most importantly the diversion
of the Egyptian grain supplies, which had traditionally gone to
Rome, to Constantinople. For a Roman-style corn-dole was introduced,
granting every citizen a guaranteed ration of grain.

In AD 325 Constantine once again held a religious council, summoning
the bishops of the east and west to Nicaea. At this council the branch
of the Christian faith known as Arianism was condemned as a heresy
and the only admissible Christian creed of the day (the Nicene Creed)
was precisely defined.

Constantine’s reign was that of a hard, utterly determined and ruthless
man. Nowhere did this show more than when in AD 326, on suspicion of
adultery or treason, he had his own eldest son Crispus executed.

One account of the events tells of Constantine’s wife Fausta falling
in love with Crispus, who was her stepson, and made an accusation
of him committing adultery only once she had been rejected by him,
or because she simply wanted Crispus out of the way, in order to let
her sons acceed to the throne unhindered. Then again, Constantine had
only a month ago passed a strict law against adultery and might have
felt obliged to act. And so Crispus was executed at Pola in Istria.

Though after this execution Constantine’s mother Helena convinced the
emperor of Crispus’ innocence and that Fausta’s accusation had been
false. Escaping the vengeance of her husband, Fausta killed herself
at Treviri.

A brilliant general, Constantine was a man of boundless energy and
determination, yet vain, receptive to flattery and suffering from a
choleric temper.

Had Constantine defeated all contenders to the Roman throne, the need
to defend the borders against the northern barbarians still remained.

In the autumn of AD 328, accompanied by Constantine II, he campaigned
against the Alemanni on the Rhine. This was followed in late AD 332
by a large campaign against the Goths along the Danube until in AD
336 he had re-conquered much of Dacia, once annexed by Trajan and
abandoned by Aurelian.

In AD 333 Constantine’s fourth son Constans was raised to the rank of
Caesar, with in the clear intent to groom him, alongside his brothers,
to jointly inherit the empire. Also Constantine’s nephews Flavius
Dalmatius (who may have been raised to Caesar by Constantine in AD
335 !) and Hannibalianus were raised as future emperors.

Evidently they also were intended to be granted their shares of power
at Constantine’s death.

How, after his own experience of the tetrarchy, Constantine saw it
possible that all five of these heirs should rule peaceably alongside
each other, is hard to understand.

In old age now, Constantine planned a last great campaign, one which
was intended to conquer Persia. He even intended to have himself
baptized as a Christian on the way to the frontier in the waters
of the river Jordan, just as Jesus had been baptized there by John
the Baptist.

As the ruler of these soon to be conquered territories, Constantine
even placed his nephew Hannibalianus on the throne of Armenia, with
the title of King of Kings, which had been the traditional title
borne by the kings of Persia.

But this scheme was not to come to anything, for in the spring of
AD 337, Constantine fell ill. Realising that he was about to die, he
asked to be baptized. This was performed on his deathbed by Eusebius,
bishop of Nicomedia.

Constantine died on 22 May AD 337 at the imperial villa at Ankyrona.

His body was carried to the Church of the Holy Apostles, his mausoleum.

Had his own wish to be buried in Constantinople caused outrage in Rome,
the Roman senate still decided on his deification. A strange decision
as it elevated him, the first Christian emperor, to the status of an
old pagan deity.

ad.php?idx=2201

http://theseoultimes.com/ST/?url=/ST/db/re