The other victims

International Herald Tribune, France

WAR IN IRAQ

The other victims

By Mokhtar Lamani The Boston Globe
Published: September 20, 2007

Armenians, Chaldo-Assyrian Christians, Faili Kurds, Shabaks,
Palestinians, Baha’is, Mandeans, Yazidis, Turkomans and Jews, together
with their Sunni and Shiite neighbors, form an intricate fabric that
gave rise to today’s modern Iraqi state. Ironically, they find
themselves on the fringes of the Iraqi society. Tragically, last
month’s massacre of more than 400 Yazidis – one of Iraq’s numerous
religious minorities – and the international coverage it received, has
placed the spotlight on a forgotten tale in that country’s ongoing de
facto civil war: The continuous and often-underreported violence,
which ethnic minority leaders in the country portray as genocide of
devastating consequences, against minority populations. Both Iraqi and
U.S. officials have blamed the attack on Qaeda-linked Islamic
militants.

The brutal attacks against the Yazidis, who are predominantly ethnic
Kurds whose religion blends elements of Islam, Christianity,
Zoroastrianism and Judaism, dating back more than 4,000 years,
underscored the fear and the harsh reality that reflect the growing
insecurity and anxiety gripping Iraq’s minorities. Minorities are
especially vulnerable given the lack of militias to protect their
communities, a practice often used by the Shiite and Sunni
populations. Notwithstanding press coverage of the daily atrocities,
which have claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of Sunnis and
Shiites and, to a lesser extent, Kurds, the plight of the country’s
disappearing minorities, who are caught in the cross fire of the
ongoing conflict, does not feature high in the international debate on
Iraq.

With this tragic state of affairs and an absence of any semblance of
normality, peace and security, allowing both Shiites and Sunni
extremists to use their discretionary power to bomb churches, massacre
and rape women and girls, and engage in the forced conversion of
numerous innocent Iraqi minorities every month, hundreds of thousands
have fled the country since the overthrow of Saddam’s secular
Baathist-led government, and many more are attempting to run for their
lives.

In what has become the rule rather than the exception, minority groups
across the country are often required to either pay a "protection tax"
or face banishment from their ancestral lands or conversion to
Islam. The consequence of noncompliance with these ultimatums is
usually punishment by death. According to relief agencies and
religious minority leaders in the country, the smaller minorities are
disappearing quickly. The Sabean-Mandean sect, which follows the
teachings of John the Baptist, had a population of 25,000 in 2003. It
now numbers less than 5,000.

Meanwhile, United Nations estimates show that approximately 50 percent
of Iraqi Christians, who numbered 1 to 2 million at the last count in
2003, may have already left the country for neighboring states – Syria
in particular and, to a lesser extent, Jordan, while others have
managed to slip into Western states to join their extended families
who fled with the toppling of Saddam Hussein. They leave behind the
ruins of more than 30 churches destroyed by Islamic extremists.

Given the predicament that minorities find themselves in, and the
eventual withdrawal of the U.S.-led coalition from Iraq, many have
begun contemplating the seemingly discouraging dilemma of figuring out
for themselves what it means to be freed from a tyrannical system of
dictatorship under Saddam, only to be left to the mercy of extremists.

A return to the fundamental understanding of what it means to be an
Iraqi, something that involves an innovative approach to fostering a
real dialogue among Iraqis, based on common citizenship, offers the
best hope of ending the chaos and anarchy that have engulfed Iraqis,
including the country’s disappearing minorities. With precious time
left, neighboring governments and occupying forces ought to muster
enough courage, even to the detriment of their short-term foreign
policy objectives, to treat Iraq’s minorities with special care and
consideration.

Mokhtar Lamani, a former Arab League special representative in Iraq,
is a visiting research fellow at the Center for International
Governance Innovation in Waterloo, Canada. He Hany Besada is senior
researcher at the center. This article first appeared in The Boston
Globe.

Gandzasar on the rise in Armenia

uefa.com, Switzerland

Gandzasar on the rise in Armenia

Friday 21 September 2007 by Khachik Chakhoyan from
Yerevan

In the last month FC Gandzasar Kapan made the biggest
progress of all the top-flight clubs. The team from
the south of Armenia won five matches in a row and
moved from sixth place to third.

Barsegyan replacement
At the beginning of the year, coach Albert Sargsyan
left the team and the board of the club began looking
for a replacement. They signed a short-term contract
with ex-Armenia coach Suren Barsegyan, who started
preparing for the new season. Like all other local
clubs, Gandzasar started the campaign with national
cup games.

Contenders defeated
In the last 16 they beat first division side FC
Bentonit 1-0 at home but lost the away game 2-0 to bow
out of the tournament. After that they made a great
start in the Armenian league, winning their first
match at home to title contenders FC Ararat Yerevan.
This victory inspired Gandzasar and the team went on
to defeat FC Ulis Yerevan and draw with FC Shirak and
FC Kilikia.

Coach departs
After four rounds the team were in second place but
then Barsegyan left the club to take control of Ulis.
Without the coach, the team suffered four subsequent
defeats at the hands of leaders FC Pyunik, FC Banants,
FC MIKA and Ararat. After that ex-Pyunik coach Samvel
Petrosyan was given a place at the helm. This decision
brought an immediate effect with the team becoming
more solid at the back and more aggressive up front.

Awesome August
As a result the Kapan club earned a surprise victory
at Banants then won five games in August. The third
round of the Armenian championship started for
Gandzasar with another win against Ararat. This was
the beginning of a great run of five matches. The most
important victory was gained in an away match against
reigning champions Pyunik (2-1) which saw Gandzasar
pull level with third-placed Banants. Gandzasar’s key
player is the experienced Artur Kocharyan, who is an
idol for local supporters.

Player influx
The striker is their leading goalscorer for the second
year running. Last term he scored 15 goals and has
seven already in this campaign. The squad was recently
strengthened with Pyunik’s Valeri Aleksanyan, Banants’
Artak Oseyan and two Romanian players – Constantin
Paunescu and Virgil Marsavela. Their recent success
has inspired the club’s board to be more active in the
transfer market with four more players currently on
trial.

©uefa.com 1998-2007. All rights reserved.

World Champions Learn Futsal Fate

WORLD CHAMPIONS LEARN FUTSAL FATE

uefa.com
Tuesday 18 September 2007
Switzerland

Spain have been handed games against Croatia and Georgia as they
begin their bid for a third straight FIFA Futsal World Cup.

Spanish challenge Having taken the title in Guatemala in 2000 and
defended it four years later in Chinese Taipei, Spain will aim to
complete a hat-trick in Brazil next autumn. But first they must win
qualifying round Group 3 on home soil to gain one of five places in
the play-offs. The winners of those home and away play-offs will then
qualify for Brazil.

Interesting draw Among the other pools, 2004 runners-up Italy will
host Andorra, Cyprus and Kazakhstan in Group 8, while their fellow
former European champions Russia – who did not qualify for the last
World Cup – are up against Serbia and France in Group 1, which like
Spain’s section boasts only three teams. Of the other teams to compete
in Chinese Taipei, Portugal play Slovakia, Latvia and Turkey, Ukraine
face debutants Moldova, Israel and Bulgaria and the Czech Republic
take on Azerbaijan, Finland and Armenia.

2008 FIFA Futsal World Cup qualifying round 23 February-2 March Hosts
in bold

Group 1 Group 2 Russia Netherlands Serbia Bosnia-Herzegovina France
Lithuania – Estonia

Group 3 Group 4 Spain Hungary Croatia Poland Georgia F.Y.R. Macedonia
– England

Group 5 Group 6 Belgium Czech Republic Belarus Azerbaijan Romania
Finland Montenegro Armenia

Group 7 Group 8 Slovenia Italy Greece Andorra Albania Cyprus Malta
Kazakhstan

Group 9 Group 10 Portugal Ukraine Slovakia Moldova Latvia Israel
Turkey Bulgaria

Any Type Of Encroachment – Intolerable

ANY TYPE OF ENCROACHMENT – INTOLERABLE

Hayoc Ashkharh
Tuesday 18 September 2007

How would you comment on the act of violence against the
editor-in-chief of "Iskakan Iravunk" newspaper Hovhannes Galajyan,
due to which he is in the hospital at the moment?

In response to the question of "Hayots Ashkharh" daily, Presidential
Press-Secretary Victor Soghomonyan said," We strictly condemn any
time of encroachment against the freedom of speech, any journalist,
or Mass Media. We hope our law enforcement agencies will do their
bests to disclose the crime and to call the accused to account."

Update 1-MTS Buys Armenia Operator For 310 Mln Euro

UPDATE 1-MTS BUYS ARMENIA OPERATOR FOR 310 MLN EURO

Reuters.uk, UK
Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:39 PM BST

YEREVAN/MOSCOW, Sept 14 (Russia) – Mobile TeleSystems (MTS) (MBT.N:
Quote, Profile , Research), Russia’s biggest mobile phone service
operator, said on Friday it had acquired 80 percent of Armenia’s
K-Telecom, which operates under the Vivacell brand, for 310 million
euros ($430 million).

MTS, controlled by services conglomerate Sistema (SSAq.L: Quote,
Profile , Research), also said it had an option to buy the remaining
20 percent of what is Armenia’s biggest mobile network provider.

"This acquisition fully complies with our strategy to capture growth
opportunities in the fast growing CIS markets," MTS’s chief executive,
Leonid Melamed, said in a statement.

Russia’s biggest mobile service providers are in fierce competition
to expand into post-Soviet countries where fewer people own mobile
phones and the markets still have a potential to grow.

Mobile phone penetration in Armenia is around 39 percent, MTS said,
while penetration in Russia and Ukraine, MTS biggest markets, already
tops 110 percent.

K-Telecom operates under the GSM-900/1800 standard.

Its licence, valid until the end of 2019, covers the entire territory
of Armenia.

As of July 1 it had a 66 percent market share and provided services
to over 986,000 subscribers, MTS said.

MTS said that it would consolidate the financial results of K-Telecom,
which it bought from Lebanese investment group Fattouche, into its
financial statements from Sept. 14, 2007.

"The option for the remaining 20-percent stake in K-Telecom will
take effect not earlier than 2010 and will be effective until 2012,"
Melamed told reporters.

MTS’s key rival in Russia, Vimpelcom (VIP.N: Quote, Profile ,
Research), bought Armenia’s second-biggest mobile provider, Armentel,
in 2006 for $488 million.

Its client base in the country stands at 530,000.

Armenian PM: No Armenian Cultural Monument Is Subject For Negotiatio

ARMENIAN PM: NO ARMENIAN CULTURAL MONUMENT IS SUBJECT FOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH GEORGIA

ArmInfo
2007-09-12 20:01:00

No Armenian cultural monument is a subject for negotiations with
Georgia, Armenian Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan said at the Armenian
National Assembly, Wednesday, in response to MP Armen Ashotyan’s
question regarding the problem with visits to the Armenian monument
Khorakert on the boundary with Georgia.

The premier said: "the given issue is not a subject for negotiations
with Georgia." However, Armen Ashotyan said Georgia does not allow
Armenian pilgrims to visit the monument threatening with detention for
border crossing. Earlier Armenian pilgrims had no problems with the
visits to the monument. The parliamentarian mentions that Azerbaijan
also faced a similar problem with the monument for David Garedzhi.

Plan For Armenian Park Moves Ahead

PLAN FOR ARMENIAN PARK MOVES AHEAD
By Thomas C. Palmer Jr., Globe Staff, [email protected].

Boston Globe, United States
September 11, 2007

But full genocide memorial might not come to pass

An Armenian-American group’s proposal for a park on the Rose Fitzgerald
Kennedy Greenway to recognize the Armenian genocide in the early 20th
century is suddenly moving forward.

Despite longstanding opposition to Greenway memorials – by park
advocates and by the conservancy that is assuming control of the
parks corridor – the Mayor’s Central Artery Completion Task Force,
the Boston Redevelopment Authority, and others are working to clear
the way for the Armenian-American group.

It wants to donate and maintain the park, which would be built on a
small block near Faneuil Hall Marketplace in downtown Boston.

Yet to be determined is whether the block in question, called Parcel
13, would be a park, a memorial, or some combination.

"We’re trying to understand what a memorial is," Rob Tuchmann,
cochairman of the task force, said yesterday.

"We’re trying to work with the proponents to have words on a plaque
which give recognition and appreciation to the donors, as opposed to
a message of commemoration or a memorial."

The mayor’s task force was scheduled to take up Parcel 13 at a meeting
this morning, where it will ask an established North End community
group to review the proposal.

That group, the North End Central Artery Advisory Committee, will be
charged with setting up guidelines for a park on the half-acre between
Commercial Street and Atlantic Avenue, near Christopher Columbus Park.

"We have been asked to participate in a public process, and we
look forward to doing so," said James M. Kalustian, president of
the Armenian Heritage Foundation, the group that is advancing the
park plan.

Armenian-Americans in Watertown recently convinced the national
Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish group, to acknowledge that the deaths
of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians at the hands of Turks starting
in 1915 amounted to genocide.

The memorial issue is highly charged.

Greenway planners and community members intended the string of parks,
created when the old Central Artery was put underground as part of
the Big Dig, to be free of memorials – unlike, say, the National Mall
in Washington, D.C.

In addition, the Armenian proposal did not go through a "tripartite"
process – involving the surrounding community, the Massachusetts
Turnpike Authority, and the City of Boston – as other Greenway
proposals did.

Rather, it emanated from special legislation in 2000 that directed
the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority to try to find a place for a
genocide memorial in Boston.

The authority has since promoted a park, designed by a team led by
Tellalian Associates Architects & Planners LLC of Boston, for the spot.

The state got involved in June when Ian A. Bowles, secretary of
the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, ruled the
Turnpike Authority "did not follow the ‘joint development’ process
outlined for the Greenway open space parcels." He directed the
authority to help "frame an appropriate application of that process."

The proposed design of the park won praise from many, including
opponents of locating it on the Greenway. It includes a 12-sided
sculpture to recall the 12 former provinces of Armenia, a water jet
and pool, and a labyrinth of paved stone and grass 60 feet in diameter.

City officials and others have suggested other locations for
a full-fledged Armenian genocide memorial park, but the Armenian
Heritage Foundation has said it isn’t interested in other sites.

City officials have not pressed the issue.

"I think there’s a hope everything can be worked out," said Peter
Meade, chairman of the Greenway conservancy. His group’s opposition to
memorials on the Greenway, he said, "has been clear and longstanding
and coincides with the spirit of what folks have been talking about
for a long time."

Meade declined to say whether the conservancy would oppose a plaque
that refers specifically to genocide.

Bernard Cohen, secretary of the Executive Office of Transportation
and Public Works and chairman of the Turnpike Authority, said,
"The process remains open to all proposals."

Trade Turnover Between Armenia And Ukraine To Reach $200 Million In

TRADE TURNOVER BETWEEN ARMENIA AND UKRAINE TO REACH $200 MILLION IN 2007

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
10/09/2007 15:31

YEREVAN, September 10. /ARKA/. Trade turnover between Armenia and
Ukraine is expected to reach $200 million in 2007.

Ukrainian Ambassador Alexander Bozhko told ARKA News Agency that he
viewed this figure very impressive.

"This is a great figure showing a high pace of trade relations
development. We want to retain these relations. Important is that
the trade is carried out with taking into consideration both parties’
interests", he said.

The ambassador said that trade turnover between the two countries grows
30 to 40% every year. The last year’s turnover grew 43% to $170mln.

"Ukraine is an important partner to Armenia", Bozhko said.

He said that Ukraine sells 300 000 liters of Armenian brandy every
year and stressed that this sale is greater than in Armenia.

At the same time, Bozhko pointed out transportation as painful problem
remaining unsolved.

He told ARKA News Agency that he had recently attended a meeting of
all Ukrainian diplomats carrying out missions in foreign countries. It
was said at the meeting that a new ferry way – Kerch-Poti – will be
launched in October. It means prices for cargo carriage will reduce
a great deal.

The ambassador also stressed the importance of joint companies.

"The number of such companies is not so great so far, but our economies
should integrate, especially in those areas already having ground
for that", he said.

Bozhko spoke about the recent meeting with representatives of Armenian
business in Ukraine. He said interesting ideas of establishing joint
companies were proposed at the meeting.

Trade turnover between Armenia and Ukraine grew 44.9% in Jan-July
2007 to $149.3mln. Armenian exports to Ukraine reached $21mln after
growing 2.1 times, compared with the same period a year earlier.

Ukrainian imports to Armenia grew 37.7% to $128.3mln.

Total volume of commodities imported in Armenia from Ukraine amounted
to $88.8 million after growing 43.3%.

Hot Weather Until September 10

HOT WEATHER UNTIL SEPTEMBER 10

Panorama.am
20:23 08/09/2007

The weather in the republic will stay hot until September 9,
with temperatures in Yerevan and the Plains of Ararat reaching 38
degrees Celsius. Head of the Armenian weather forecasting service,
Gagik Surenyan, relayed this news in an interview with a panorama.am
journalist.

In his words, this depends on the penetrating tropical air mass now
covering the republic, which sends noticeable heat into our atmosphere.

Surenyan informed that as of September 10, a cold penetrating air mass
from the West will affect temperatures, lowering them by 4-5 degrees,
with the temperature in Yerevan, from September 10-13, ranging from
33-34 degrees.

Today Yerevan recorded a temperature of 38 degrees.

They may start thinking when there is no way back

Lragir, Armenia
Sept 8 2007

THEY MAY START THINKING WHEN THERE IS NO WAY BACK

With regard to the construction of Baku-Ceyhan some Armenian
political circles said economically it is not practical because it is
costly, the oil it will transport is little. However, like all
through the history of mankind, the world ignored the Armenian
political thought and built the oil pipeline. As if the world
develops despite Armenia. Now they are going to build the railroad
Kars-Akhalkalaki-Tbilisi-Baku, which will be launched solemnly in
October. The Armenian political thought certainly says it has nothing
to do with the world, that the Turks and Azerbaijanis want to build
the railroad to finally isolate Armenia, and misled Georgia into
supporting the anti-Armenian policy. This viewpoint is closer to the
Armenian reality. For Turkey and Azerbaijan, the new railroad will be
another means of isolating the blockade of Armenia. In addition, it
is a rather serious means because it will almost nullify the vision
of operation of the railroad Kars-Gyumri. If a new railroad is built,
Kars-Gyumri will lose its regional importance. One does not need to
be an experienced political scientist or a farsighted politician to
understand this. Of course, it does not mean that if Kars-Akhalkalaki
is built, Kars-Gyumri will never be operated. It will be operated but
it will stop being a regional infrastructure, and Armenia will lose a
significant factor enhancing its role, only Armenia will use
Gyumri-Kars to connect with Turkey and with the region via Turkey in
case the border is opened.

However, describing the construction of Kars-Akhalkalaki as an
anti-Armenian project has perhaps only one purpose – to justify our
weakness against this undesirable development. The proponents of this
opinion say the United States and Europe refused to finance the
construction of the railroad. However, for whatever reason they tend
to forget that the United States and Europe stated through Bryza,
deputy assistant secretary of the U.S. Secretary of State, and the
EU’s special representative for the South Caucasus Semneby that may
not finance but they cannot prevent the construction either. The
problem is that the Armenian lobbies in the United States and the EU
countries could accuse their governments they give money for the
project but cannot accuse that they do not bomb the building site and
stop the construction.

In other words, the West found the best way of agreement not to
offend the Armenians and Armenia, and on the other hand, to enable
the construction of a new infrastructure which will weaken the
Russian influence in the region by one degree. The West found an
indirect way of financing the railroad. The Western money is invested
in the Azerbaijani economy, Azerbaijan lends this money to Georgia to
launch the construction. Turkey has an economy that enables financing
important projects without side support. And the fact that the West
supports indirectly the new railroad means the purpose of it is other
than the isolation of Armenia. Otherwise, the United States would use
its influence on Georgia, and this country would not join the
project, which would mean that it would not be built.

Nevertheless, the most important question is what Armenia could have
done to prevent the construction of the railroad. Perhaps nothing.
Armenia is not the country which can resist to global geopolitical
program. And perhaps there is no need to resist. After all, the
construction of Kars-Akhalkalaki is not a tragedy for us. In this
sense, Vardan Oskanyan was even right. Armenia thus misses the
opportunity of a transit corridor. But who said that this is an
opportunity for Armenia to gain certain importance? Moreover, this
opportunity is perhaps becoming secondary in the world, and the
countries which have technology move forward. In this sense, the
conservation of Armenia may have a certain positive importance for
our country. Apparently, the Armenian government is very slow
regarding a technological breakthrough. Not only regarding high
technology but also modern technology in the political, public and
economic life. In Armenia, they talk much but act little. And perhaps
everything may change if Armenia is cornered, and the government
realizes they cannot retreat any more. It will make the government
consider moving forward. Of course, it is bad that it will not be
conscious but out of the instinct of self-preservation. However, we
must use at least this possibility for progress.

After all, when is an individual or a society skilled? Perhaps when
they can use an undesirable situation in favor of them.
Kars-Akhalkalaki may be this undesirable situation for us. It is a
recurrent one but I wish at least this time we realized the state of
things and the limit of our possibilities instead of accusing the
world of immorality and a global conspiracy. Otherwise, we only have
to redirect investments in elite home construction into the industry
of pickaxes and award a medal for every ten meters of destroyed
railroad.

HAKOB BADALYAN