Who Is Persistantly Looking For A Black Cat?

WHO IS PERSISTANTLY LOOKING FOR A BLACK CAT?
Vardan Griogoryan

Hayots Ashkharh Daily, Armenia
Oct 25 2007

The fact that the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad cut short his
visit and quickly returned to Tehran gave rise to various hypotheses
and gossips in our reality.

In connection with removing several protocol events from the schedule
of the President’s official visit, a lot of things were discussed
and published during the past two days, beginning with some problems
allegedly emerging in the Armenian-Iranian relations, ending with
the Armenian women and girls’ wearing short skirts in the presence
of the high ranking Iranian guests.

The Iranian President’s not visiting Tsitsernakaberd as a result
of the October 23 schedule change became a target of speculations
too. Rumors were spread as if M. Ahmadinejad had received letters of
complaint from the Azeri residents of Iran, that’s why he cut short
his visit and returned to Tehran. This is already the peak of marasmus.

No matter how much the Foreign Ministry officials try to draw
the gossipers’ attention to obvious facts and bear witness to the
information received by the Iranian side which says that the reasons
of M. Ahmadienjad’s urgent departure have no relationship to Armenia,
the pointless discussions won’t cease.

It is partially accounted for by the fact that the information
reported by the Iranian side with regard to the Iranian President’s
urgent return to Tehran clearly refutes the "Armenian version";
however the other aspect of the issue remains uncertain, i.e. there
is no information as to the developments in and around Iran that made
M. Ahmadinejad cut short his visit.

What’s so strange there, though? Is this the first time that the people
engaged in speculations come to know about the confidential practices
characteristic to authorities? Don’t they know that the Iranians do
not like to disclose their own, i.e. domestic problems to anyone? And
if there are such problems, they are obvious to all those who are
more or less familiar with the processes currently under-way in Iran.

For instance, it is no secret for anyone that a new representative from
the Iranian side was to participate in the EU-Iran meeting that was
held in Rome yesterday. Sayid Jalaly, who has replaced Ali Larijani
in the current negotiations around Iran’s Nuclear Program, embodies
M. Ahmadinejad’s hard-line policy. As far back as quite recently, such
policy was supported by the Ayatollahs, the highest clergy producing
a crucial impact on the political developments of the Islamic country.

However, the situation has now taken a turn, so the highest clergy
opposes S. Jalili’s candidacy and especially – the current policy.

And this promises not only external but also internal political
consequences.

However, all this is the internal affair of our neighboring friend
country, and the Armenian-Iranian relations cannot suffer as a result
of the recent developments in and around Iran. Instead, they may be
negatively influenced by the overflow of various propaganda-based
hypothesis and assumptions that have recently flooded into the press
in the strictest sense of the word.

It is no secret that there are serious forces in the world which are
interested in the deterioration of the Armenian-Iranian relations. If
we add to them the anti-Armenian propaganda, from time to time
organized in Iran by the efforts of Turkey and Azerbaijan, it will
become obvious that the fantastic hypotheses and gossips around the
Iranian President’s most recent official visit to Armenia may give
rise to some uncertainty in both countries’ relations.

We are inclined to believe that the changes made in the schedule of
the Iranian President’s official visit were a proper occasion for
some forces and media operating inside our country to vainly look
for a black cat in the Armenian-Iranian relations.

Tennis Player From Karabakh Won First Place In Armenia

TENNIS PLAYER FROM KARABAKH WON FIRST PLACE IN ARMENIA

KarabakhOpen
25-10-2007 16:28:59

The table tennis championship of Armenia was held in Vanadzor on
October 18 to 22. The team of Artsakh included sportsmen from the
Stepanakert Juvenile Sports School and Artsakh Club.

The sportsmen of the sports school were successful in pair
games. Varujan Baghdasaryan took the first place, Anna Adamyan took
the second place.

Turkey’s Iraq Dilemma Poses Hard Questions

TURKEY’S IRAQ DILEMMA POSES HARD QUESTIONS
By Yevgeny Primakov

Moscow News
Oct 25 2007
Russia

The Turkish parliament sanctioned a cross border military operation
in northern Iraq by an overwhelming majority of votes.

Since the authorization to conduct such an operation is valid for one
year, there is good reason to believe that the Turkish armed forces
were given the green light, and now an armed attack is inevitable –
moreover, there may be a series of attacks [Turkish army units crossed
the Iraqi border in a special operation against Kurdish militants,
local newspapers said on Wednesday. The Yeni Safak newspaper reported
that Turkish commandos supported by helicopters were chasing Kurdish
fighters, and F-16 Falcon fighter-bombers and artillery were delivering
pinpoint strikes on militant bases about 50 kilometers (30 miles)
deep into Iraqi territory. – Ed.]

Meanwhile, the prospect of Turkish intervention has provoked a negative
reaction in the world. This is hardly surprising for many reasons. A
military strike will ratchet up hostilities, which would seriously
threaten the situation in Iraqi Kurdistan, which is relatively calmer
than in other parts of the country. Such a move could also destabilize
the neighboring section of Turkey, where an estimated 10 million Kurds
live. Furthermore, the global community is tired of methods based on
the use of force, especially after the launch of the U.S. military
operation in Iraq.

There are also a number of questions connected with Turkey’s military
operation.

First, military action, whose consequences will be clearly negative,
is aimed at suppressing the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which has
been outlawed in Turkey. PKK fighters, based in the north of Iraq,
carry out continuous hit-and-run attacks on Turkish territory, which
result in casualties not only among Turkish military and police
officers, but also among civilians. Speaking about an operation
against Kurdish insurgents, Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan said that
his country would not be deterred by any possible consequences of
an invasion in Iraq. "Whatever price is necessary, we will pay it,"
he said. "Although Turkey respects Iraq’s territorial integrity,
it will not tolerate the aiding and abetting of terrorism, and it
will not be deterred from paying the price to protect its rights,
indivisible integrity and citizens." Does Turkey, in this situation,
have a right to use military force outside its sovereign territory
against forces using terrorist methods?

Second, for many years, Ankara has followed a course aimed at
assimilating the Kurdish population. The Kurds were even called
"Mountain Turks," presumably in an effort to destroy their ethnic
identity. Today, some changes have occurred in the policy toward
the Turkish Kurds, but as recent events show, that does nothing
to weaken their striving for self-determination. At the same time,
while opposing any form of autonomy for the Kurds, Ankara upholds
not only the principle of the country’s territorial integrity but
also the universal character of the Turkish state. One of its basic
arguments here is that granting autonomy to the Kurds would encourage
their secession. Should, in these contradictory conditions, Ankara’s
stance on the Kurdish issue be supported? Or maybe it should, together
with the Turkish Kurds’ right to self-determination? It is difficult
to provide an unequivocal answer to these questions.

Third, Iraq’s territorial integrity has been put on the line – now,
not in some distant future. The majority of its population and all
neighboring countries, as well as other countries, favor a single,
unified state. It is well known that the Iraqi Kurds have for many
decades been fighting for national self-determination. But prior
to the U.S. intervention, the prevailing formula was: strengthening
Kurdish autonomy as part of Iraq. Now the situation is changing in
favor of an independent Kurdish state that could comprise not only
Iraqi Kurds, but also Kurds from Turkey, Iran, and Syria. According to
various estimates, there are between 20 million and 30 million Kurds
in these four countries. So, for all the importance of preserving
Iraq’s territorial integrity, should the aspiration of millions of
Kurds to create their own state be endorsed?

Fourth, the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs, just passed a
resolution labeling the [1915] massacre of Armenians at the end of
the Ottoman period as genocide. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates urged the House not to put the
resolution to the vote. President George Bush also cautioned against
its adoption. But the Representatives refused to budge. From every
indication, the resolution, which provoked strong indignation among the
Turks, has eliminated an impediment that prevented Erdogan from making
good on his threats to invade Iraq. It is an open secret that the
debate around the resolution in the U.S. fit neatly into the context
of the election struggle between the Democrats and the Republicans.

While understanding the feelings of the Armenians, who embraced the
resolution, one cannot ignore the fact that in passing it, the U.S.

was less concerned about the future of the Armenian people than it
was about partisan interests at home. What line should one take on
this resolution, which has so seriously affected the feelings of
both the Armenians and the Turks? Generally speaking, how should
one treat parliamentary resolutions that pass judgment on the past,
on history, and do not aim to search for ways of reconciling nations,
now or in the future?

Fifth, 70 percent of essential supplies, including 30 percent of fuel
and lubricants, goes to the U.S. occupation force via Turkey. That,
without a doubt, is one of the causes for the U.S.’s serious concern
about the current situation. High level U.S. envoys have visited
Ankara, but the problem of Turkish invasion in Iraq has not been
resolved. That might prompt Washington to make public the long awaited
time table for the withdrawal of its troops from Iraq. But is that
reason enough to support Turkey’s actions?

To be frank, I, for one, remain perplexed by these questions.

Anne Derse: US Wants Peaceful Solution To The Karabakh Conflict

ANNE DERSE: US WANTS PEACEFUL SOLUTION TO THE KARABAKH CONFLICT

armradio.am
24.10.2007 17:17

The US eager to see the South Caucasus as the stable and peaceful
region, Anne E. Derse, the US Ambassador to Azerbaijan, said in talks
with journalists on 24 October.

"US wants peaceful solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh," the US Ambassador
said.

According to the Ambassador, the United State, which has joined the
OSCE Minsk Group, renders assistance in holding peace negotiations
and takes every effort to establish stability in the region.

"We will continue our efforts in this direction, as we understand their
importance for Azerbaijan and the whole region," the Ambassador said.

Serge Sargsyan Participated In Meeting Of Armenian-American Working

SERGE SARGSYAN PARTICIPATED IN MEETING OF ARMENIAN-AMERICAN WORKING GROUP

PanARMENIAN.Net
24.10.2007 16:15 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian Prime Minister Serge Sargsyan and Under
Secretary for Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs, Reuben Jeffery
took part in the meeting of the Armenian-American working group.

In his opening remarks, Mr Jeffery praised stability of the Armenian
economy and poverty reduction in rural areas. "The activities of the
working group embrace new fields," he said.

For his part, PM Sargsyan said, "The Armenian authorities attend to
development of rural areas and implementation of poverty reduction
programs but do not hope for foreign assistance. We take measures to
resolve problems available in our villages."

Upon completion of the meeting, Vardan Khachatryan, the Armenian
Minister of Finance and Economy and Thomas C. Adams, Coordinator
of U.S. Assistance to Europe and Eurasia, signed an agreement on
cooperation for civil aviation security, the RA government’s press
office reported.

Rudolph Perina Completing Diplomatic Mission To Armenia October 26

RUDOLPH PERINA COMPLETING DIPLOMATIC MISSION TO ARMENIA OCTOBER 26

PanARMENIAN.Net
24.10.2007 12:14 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The U.S. Charge d’Affairs in Armenia, Rudolph Perina
is completing his diplomatic mission October 26. Spokesman for the
U.S. Embassy, Taguhi Jahukian told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter that
Vice Ambassador Joseph Pennington will act as U.S. Charge d’Affairs
until appointment of Ambassador.

In September 2006, Ambassador John Evans was prematurely recalled
from his post and dismissed because of remarks he made while visiting
California in 2005 regarding his open acknowledgement of the Armenian
Genocide.

Richard Hoagland’s nomination as the next Ambassador to Armenia was
twice blocked by Senator Robert Menendez over Hoagland’s refusal to
recognize Armenian massacre in 1915 as Genocide.

TEHRAN: Iran, Armenia Ink Four Memoranda Of Understanding

IRAN, ARMENIA INK FOUR MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING

Tehran Times
Oct 23 2007
Iran

YEREVAN (IRNA) — Iran and Armenia signed four memoranda of
understanding and issued one joint statement in Yerevan on Monday.

On the first day of a visit by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
and his accompanying delegation to Armenia, officials of the two
countries inked the MOUs.

The foreign ministers of Iran and Armenia signed a MOU to establish
consulates in both countries.

The deputy governor of Central Bank of Armenia and the Deputy Foreign
Minister Mehdi Safari also inked a MOU on banking cooperation between
Iranian and Armenian central banks.

Safari and Head of Armenia Economic Development Agency Davoud Kian
signed the third MOU on making joint investments.

Head of Iran Saba Nirou Company and the deputy energy minister of
Armenia inked another MOU to construct a wind power plant in Armenian
territory.

Ahmadinejad and his Armenian counterpart Robert Kocharian also signed
a joint statement at the end of their negotiations.

The Iranian president arrived in Yerevan, heading a political and
economic delegation, at the official invitation of his Armenian
counterpart.

Ahmadinejad will hold talks with his counterpart and address Armenian
parliament during his two-day visit to Armenia.

The state-owned university of Yerevan is to grant Ahmadinejad an
honorary doctorate and medal.

He will hold talks with Iranian nationals residing in Armenia on the
second day of his stay in Armenia.

Speaker Of The Armenian Parliament About The Reason Of Early Departu

SPEAKER OF THE ARMENIAN PARLIAMENT ABOUT THE REASON OF EARLY DEPARTURE OF THE IRANIAN PRESIDENT

ArmInfo
2007-10-23 14:39:00

Speaker of the Armenian parliament Tigran Torosyan explained the
reason of early departure of the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
from Yerevan.

‘In such situations there is the necessity for the president of
a country to return to his native land’, – Tigran Torosyan told
journalists not explaining what situation made Iranian president to
break his visit.

Tigran Torosyan also said that today morning he met President of
Islamic Republic of Iran and they discussed several issues including
the results of the visit of the head of Iranian state, the prospects
of development of relations between the two states and necessity of
deepening of the inter-parliamentary relations. Torosyan said that
the Iranian president called his visit to Armenia very effective. He
also added that his Iranian counterpart invited him to visit Teheran
at the end of the current year.

Pelosi Takes Steps Back From Armenian Resolution Vote

National Journal’s CongressDaily
October 17, 2007 Wednesday 19:00 pm Eastern Time

Pelosi Takes Steps Back From Armenian Resolution Vote

Under pressure from her own caucus as well as the White House,
Speaker Pelosi today appeared to back away from a pledge to bring a
resolution on Armenian genocide to the floor by the end of the
session, saying it will take a back seat to other legislation. "We
have a short fuse on [the State Children’s Health Insurance Program],
on FISA, the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act. There are other
items on the agenda," she said.

While retreating from her pledge to hold the vote, she did not
retreat on her support for the measure. "There is a reason to bring
this to the floor," she said. "The fact is a genocide occurred."
Pelosi spoke just before a news conference by several House Democrats
calling for her to keep the measure from coming to the floor for a
vote.
Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman John Murtha, D-Pa., was
joined at the event by Reps. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., John Tanner,
D-Tenn., Robert Wexler, D-Fla., and Steve Cohen, D-Tenn. They said
the resolution threatens to disrupt the U.S. alliance with Turkey.
The White House and House Republicans have made similar points. "We
need allies if we are going to win this war," Murtha said. "My point
is this is not a way to win allies." The lawmakers argued that with
Turkey threatening to pull access to U.S. bases in the region and to
invade Kurdish-controlled area of Iraq, the threat to U.S. soldiers
outweighs the moral issues. "It will not be helpful for us to have
another part of Iraq unstable," Murtha said.

House Republican leaders have been hammering Pelosi on the issue even
as they acknowledge that support for the measure has divided members
on both sides of the aisle. Minority Whip Blunt said he plans to work
against the bill if it comes to the floor and hopes mounting pressure
will force the resolution off the agenda. "A number of Democrats are
working with me and others on that to ensure that if there is a vote,
a vote wouldn’t be successful," he said.

— by Christian Bourge and Fawn Johnson

["Katia M. Peltekian" <[email protected]>: Two companies =?unknow

–Boundary_(ID_cLEJ9VQ8t46kL8qNV+I8KA)
Content-typ e: message/rfc822

From: "Katia M. Peltekian" <[email protected]>
Subject: Two companies – Italian and American – to embark on wind electric
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Oct 19 2007

Two companies – Italian and American – to embark on wind electric
plants construction in Armenia in 2008

YEREVAN, October 19. /ARKA/. Two companies – Italian and American –
are to embark on wind electric plants construction in Armenia in
2008, Armenian Deputy Energy Minister Areg Galstyan said Thursday in
Yerevan, at the international conference on geothermal energy.

`90-megawatt plants are planned to be built in Karachakh and
25-megawatt plants in Sotka’, he said.

He also said that new territories would be searched for constructing
wind plants.
The first wind power plant was put into exploitation in December 2005
in province of Lori. Iran has provided $3.5 million as grant for
building that plant. The plant consists of four 2.6-megawatt wind
turbines.

The plant generates 5 million kilowatt/hour power every year.

Armenia’s minimal economically-justified wind energy capacity is 450
megawatt, which makes it possible to generate 1 billion kilowatt/hour
electric power.

The conference is organized by Armenian Energy Ministry and France
Embassy in Armenia. M.V.-0—

_____________________________________ _____________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

–Boundary_(ID_cLEJ9VQ8t46kL8qNV+I8KA)–

http://mail.yahoo.com