Author: Torgomian Varazdat
Over 110 mln coronavirus tests conducted in Russia
11:22,
YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 25, ARMENPRESS. Russian medics have conducted more than 110 mln tests for the presence of the novel coronavirus, TASS reports citing the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing.
“Over 110 mln tests for the presence of the coronavirus have been conducted in the Russian Federation”, the statement said. Over the past 24 hours, 162,000 tests have been made.
According to the agency, currently about 579,900 patients remain under medical observation due to the suspected coronavirus infection.
CivilNet: Highly Likely Amulsar Mine Will Open, Says Armenian PM
By Emilio Luciano Cricchio
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated in an interview with 1in.am news website that it is highly probable that the Amulsar gold mine will open.
“My attitude towards Amulsar has not changed. (…) There is a possibility that the mine will be opened, and we can say that the probability is high,” Pashinyan said.
This comes as many have criticized the Armenian government for not clearly outlining whether it is in favor or against the future opening of the gold mine.
The Armenian PM stipulated that due to the war, the flow of tourists into the country ceased, which along with currency problems caused significant economic hardship.
He went on to say that the mining industry is one of the economic sectors that guarantees cash and currency flows into Armenia.
Despite this, many protesters, environmental activists and residents of Jermuk, the town closest to the mine, have been blockading the entrances of the mine for over two years, stating that the mine’s operation will cause significant environmental consequences, including the possible polluting of local water supplies.
Meanwhile, Lydian International, the company running the mine, has been arguing that the protest blockade is illegal.
An Open Letter to President Biden About the Armenian Genocide
By Sevak Bagumyan
President Joe Biden
Dear Mr. President:
Greetings; Hope this letter finds you well and in good spirits.
As Turkey continues to assault its neighbors and engage in ethnic cleansing against its citizen minorities, and as we approach April 24 – Armenian Genocide commemoration date, I ponder:
If Turkey were held responsible for the Armenian Genocide, would it prevent the Holocaust?
If Turkey were held responsible for past ethnic cleansing and genocide against Greeks, Assyrians, Alevis, Kurds, Jews, Armenians, and Yizidis, would it prevent Turkey’s current ethnic cleansing against its minorities, especially the Kurds?
If Turkey were held responsible for its past crimes against humanity, would Turkey today engage in land grab including cultural and historical misappropriations?
If Turkey and its past leadership were held responsible for war and human crimes including genocide, would its current leader label all who dissent or disagree with him including his own citizen – students, all opposition politicians, LGBT community, Kurds, Armenians, Greeks, Yizidiz, Jews – as ‘terrorists’ deserving to be immediately eliminated?
.
Sevak Bagumyan
If Turkey were held responsible for past war and human crimes, would Turkey today
support lslamist terrorist organizations throughout the world including Hamas with $, men, home base — full political and military support – to commit terror against Israel and other nations?
If Turkey were held responsible for the Armenian Genocide, would Turkey in 2020 condone and cajole with full political and military support including thousands of Syrian jihadi terrorist sent to Azerbaijan to attack and behead Armenians?
If Turkey were timely held responsible for the Armenian Genocide, would it prevent Hitler coming to power to utter the following words when calling for the total slaughter
and elimination of the Jewish people: “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians” [August 22, 1939]?
In conclusion, “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends” – Martin Luther King Jr.
Respectfully submitted,
Sevak S. Bagumyan, Esq.
Azerbaijan protracts return of captives, grossly violates international demands – Armenia’s Ombudsman
Armenian human rights defender reports that yesterday the office sent a detailed report to the UN Human Rights Council informing that the Azerbaijani authorities are protracting the return of captives and grossly violates the international demands.
“The report was sent to the UN Human Rights Council in a separate procedure. Such opportunity have only national institutions of human rights having “A” international status,” Tatoyan wrote.
He stressed that the report clearly notes that the Azerbaijani authorities abuse the legal procedures and politicize the issue of return of captives.
“With this they make our society and first of all the families of the captives suffer, play with their feelings,” Tatoyan noted.
Armenian ruling faction to consider need for snap parliamentary elections in June
Feb 8 (Reuters) – The governing party faction in Armenia’s parliament said on Monday it would weigh the need for early parliamentary elections in June after Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s six-month plan to shore up national stability is completed.
Lilit Makunts, head of the majority “My Step” faction, said the bloc did not currently see the need for early elections but would reconsider once Pashinyan’s action plan was implemented.
“We will continue the implementation of the road map and when it ends, we will return to discussing the need to hold snap parliamentary elections or the absence of such a need,” Makunts told parliament.
Pashinyan, facing pressure to resign after ethnic Armenians lost swathes of territory in a six-week conflict with Azerbaijan late last year, announced in November a road map towards shoring up national stability and security.
Pashinyan has rejected calls for his resignation over what opponents said was his shambolic handling of the war with Azerbaijan, but said he was fully responsible for the outcome and remained responsible for ensuring Armenia’s security. (Reporting by Nvard Hovhannisyan; Editing by Mark Heinrich)
Court allowed former president Kocharyan to conclude property agreements without expropriation risk
The Yerevan General Jurisdiction Court presided by Judge Anna Danibekyan allowed Armenia’s former President Robert Kocharyan
to sign agreements on the seized property that may not result in their expropriation. The petition was submitted by Kocharyan’s lawyers. One of the members of the ex-president defense team Hovhannes Khudoyan informed that there is no risk for expropriation since the agreement may concern only the utility and property indemnity agreements.
To remind, the ex-president’s property was seized and bank accounts were frozen on 30 July 2018, four days after Kocharyan was formally charged with ‘overthrowing’ Armenia’s constitutional order.
Later, the Judge of the Yerevan General Jurisdiction Court partially satisfied the lawyers’ appeal, holding that the ex-president’s rights had been violated. The Court also partially lifted the attachment of the property belonging to Armenia’s second President Robert Kocharyan.
Turkish press: One of the oldest feelings to exist: The history of love
Love, in its simplest definition, is the intense affection a person has for another person, an entity or even a thought. Although the way it manifests itself is constantly changing, it is one of the oldest emotions since the world came into existence. The most evident form of this feeling, which has been the main theme of poems, stories, songs and movies for centuries, can be seen on Valentine’s Day. This feeling, which has expressed itself in different ways throughout all cultures and in all segments of societies for millennia, may have been hidden in handwritten letters in the past but nowadays, it manifests itself as an emoji in instant messages. From the past to the present and the future, it continues to leave stories for generations to come.
The use of the word “love” is different in every language. The more languages there are in the world, the more words there are that describe love. Even though the words are different, even the heroes, the land and the stories themselves are different, the feelings left by people are the same. For this reason, we can say that love is a universal feeling. But love is also a social concept as much as it is universal. The way it expresses and presents itself varies from society to society and even over time. Even people in the same society but of different classes can have a different understanding of love. For that reason only, love is sociological.
In ancient Greece, love meant complete harmony and perfect beauty. In fact, this sublime feeling manifested not only among humans but also among gods. Fast forward to medieval Europe, we saw the meaning of love beginning to change. Love was more apart of morality than a pure feeling. People began expressing a love that has become a virtue, one that should be preserved in a sacred marriage bond. Although this was not the case among the layfolk, love among the nobles had become virtuous, far from the evils and sexual urges that were under the influence of the church. Love, which changes according to geography, religion and even social class, has been influential in Anatolian lands for centuries and has been passed on from generation to generation.
Asia Minor also witnessed many great legends of love, folk songs to crown the dark evenings and stories to be conveyed from language to language. The common feature of these legendary loves is that the lovers could never meet, and even if they did, the ones who left their marks on our hearts were impossible to keep. The people who carried these legendary loves to the present day were folk poets called “aşık,” or lovers, in essence. Accompanied by a bağlama, a type of saz and an eight or ten-stringed lute, they traveled from village to village, town to town, telling stories of love and lessons in life. Being a bard (aşık/folk poet) was also not for everyone. The person who would fall in love had to gain this ability by experiencing this feeling deeply. Just like in the story of Resul, who becomes Aşık Garip for the sake of his love.
After his death, Hodja Ahmet, a wealthy Tabriz merchant thought to have lived between the 16th and 18th centuries, leaves his inheritance to his son Resul. Resul, who went about his days spending his inheritance with his friends, loses all of his money one day. Not being able to hold on to any job, he starts working as an apprentice with folk poets, but he isn’t very successful in that either. One night, Resul sees an old dervish drinking bade (wine) in his dream, and in the same dream, Shah Senem is also drinking bade. Turns out that they both have the same dream the same night and fall in love with each other. Resul, who was very impressed by the dream he saw, starts playing the saz. This love turns the apostle into Aşık (Bard) Garip. After that day, Resul travels around the world in search of Shah Senem. Traveling from Tabriz to Tbilisi, Resul finds his big love here. The story is that Shah Senem’s father, Bilge Sinan, does not want to give away his daughter to a poor boy. Aşık Garip travels the cities and plays his saz in village coffee shops. He managed to save up the gold that Bilge Sinan requested as a dowry, returns to Tbilisi and marries the girl he loves. But love stories in this region do not always have such happy endings. Most of the time, despite all the struggles and obstacles, lovers cannot meet, and their love consumes them, just like Kerem and Aslı.
Sometime in the 16th century, Kerem, the son of the Sultan of Isfahan in Iran (or Persia as it was known), falls in love with Aslı, the daughter of an Armenian monk who is the sultan’s treasurer. However, the two are not meant to be together as they share different beliefs. The Armenian monk cannot accept this situation and flees with his daughter Aslı. Kerem goes after Aslı with her friend Sofu Kardeş. Traveling all over Anatolia, Kerem writes poems to the beauties he sees in Aslı, sharing his troubles with everyone he meets and asks around to find his love. During these journeys, a miracle happens. Kerem runs into the pasha of Aleppo. The pasha, who has a liking to Kerem, manages to persuade the Armenian monk. In the end, Kerem and Aslı marry. But the story doesn’t end here. The monk is actually not willing to officiate their marriage. He casts a spell on the shirt his daughter wears on her wedding night. The buttons of the shirt cannot be undone. Unable to free Aslı from this shirt, Kerem takes a deep sigh and burns to ash with flames coming out of his mouth. Baffled and heartbroken by what has happened, Aslı cries over the ashes of her beloved and a spark ignites her hair. She, too, dies by fire. And finally, the lovers’ ashes meet.
This is just one of the versions of Aslı and Kerem’s love, and there are variations of their story in Azerbaijan and Armenia among many other countries. And in Anatolia, there are countless other legends that tell of lovers who could not be reunited. Leyla and Mecnun, Ferhat and Şirin and many other epics told by folk poets for centuries are some of the most widely known. Although the names and places may change, a recurring theme draws attention. Love was not an easy phenomenon in Anatolian culture. There were obstacles to overcome, roads to travel. And even if these lovers succeeded, it was not guaranteed that you’d be with the one you loved. In these legends, lovers were tested in various ways and expected to achieve extraordinary deeds. Sometimes they were expected to cross deserts like Mecnun, and sometimes they had to pierce a huge mountain like Ferhat. Likewise, Romeo and Juliet, whose tragedy was famously depicted by William Shakespeare in the Italian city of Verona, was no walk in the park either. They all had to overcome difficult tasks to prove their love.
As much as love is a feeling that exists between two people, it is also a social construct, and at times, a class phenomenon. All the love stories told until this time also reveal the social conditions of the period and society’s understanding of love. Love is often not a matter concerning two people, but their religious beliefs, economic factors and social classes. There were social factors, not mountains or monsters, standing as an obstacle against Kerem and Aslı’s love – Bilge Sinan said Kerem was not fit for marriage as he was not at the same economic level and the Armenian monk opposed Kerem because he belonged to a different religion. Likewise, Romeo and Juliet were children of hostile families, and this was the only obstacle to their love.
After all, love is one of our highest and noblest feelings. It’s not in vain, so let’s not write poems and sing songs for it for centuries. Love is one of the oldest feelings to exist, yet it continues to impress us with the same freshness and same effect. Love continues to exist in spite of the changing ages, industrial revolutions, world wars and technological revolutions and takes shape with them. Maybe there are no monsters today, but love stories continue to be passed on. And as the song “Historia de un amor” by Mexican Luis Miguel goes, “Es la historia de un amor, Como no hay otro igual.” (it’s the history of love, there is like no other.)
Asbarez: Rights of Citizens Must Guide Any Border Determination, Says Human Rights Defender
February 1, 2021
Armenia’s Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan
Citing historical errors, Armenia’s Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan on Monday said the rights of Armenia’s citizens should be the basis for any decisions involving the determination of borders.
“When in 1923, in order to artificially separate Armenia from Artsakh, ‘Red Kurdistan’ was formed, the border disputes with Zangezur of the Armenian SSR intensified. One of the main concerns consistently raised by the people of Zangezur at the time was the issue of the rights of the villagers to the lands, along with the winter and summer time pastures and gardens,” Tatoyan said in a statement posted on his Facebook page.
“For example, in October of 1925, a member of the State Committee of the Armenian SSR, A. Yerznkyan, by way of a reference, stated that the areas West of the border with Meghri and Karyagino (Jabrail) were mainly winter pastures, which were actually used by the residents of the villages of Kapan and Meghri without grasslands. One of the main reasons was that without these pastures, the livestock of the villages in the referenced regions would be paralyzed,” explained Tatoyan.
“In another case, the head of the local commission for demarcation of the borders of Zangezur ‘between the provinces of Kurdistan,’ Ya. Kochetkov, by way of an example, based his disagreement with the Azeri proposals on the village of Teghut on the fact that it is one of the districts of Shvanidzor, where the lands (gardens and pastures) are so intertwined that it will be impossible to separate them,” added Tatoyan. “The same disputes over the rights of the villagers took place between the villages of Kapan and Zangelan, Khoznavar and Azerbaijan.”
“In 1924, 1926, 1929, and 1935 sessions of the local commission of the USSR tasked with resolving the border disputes and relevant issues, it is clear from the materials memorializing the efforts of these years, that discussions pertaining to the rights of the villagers of the USSR have repeatedly been woefully inadequate. For example, Zangezur’s scarcity of “village-to-village” connections (administrative, economic, etc.) was ignored, and without an accounting of the difficulties that might arise for the rights of villagers,” said Tatoyan.
“All of these shortcomings once again confirm that the rights of the citizens of the Republic of Armenia should be the basis of decisions when engaged in the process of determining the borders; it is necessary to take into account all the mistakes made in the past; to learn the necessary lessons from them; and to not permit violations or disregard of rights,” the human rights defender urged.
Statement: Handing Tigranashen village over to Azerbaijan not discussed during Armenia PM’s visit to Ararat Province
The Ararat provincial hall has issued a statement noting that the report, according to which the matter of handing Armenia’s Tigranashen village over to Azerbaijan in the near future was discussed during Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s visit to Ararat Province on Wednesday, is not true.
“During the visit, the scope of issues related solely to the programs implemented and to be implemented in the province was discussed, which was presented earlier in an official statement,” the aforesaid statement reads.