Author: Torgomian Varazdat

President meets Turkish counterpart
Baku, May 24, AssA-Irada
On Tuesday, President Ilham Aliyev met with his Turkish counterpart Ahmet
Necdet Sezer, who arrived in Baku on the same day to attend the ceremony of
pumping first oil into the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline.
Sezer said that participating in the BTC commissioning is a historical event,
noting that the pipeline and other economic projects will play an important
role in the development of the two countries’ economies.
The Turkish President said that the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas pipeline will be
commissioned solemnly as well, pointing out the late Azerbaijani President
Heydar Aliyev’s outstanding contribution to the implementation of these
large-scale projects.
`Turkey will further support Azerbaijan’s position on the peaceful
settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Upper Garabagh,’Sezer said.
President Aliyev highly assessed Turkey’s support to Azerbaijan andvoiced
his satisfaction with the level of bilateral political, economic and cultural
relations.*

LOANING PROGRAMME LAUNCHED
Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
16 May 05
The Fund for Development of Small and Medium-Size Business set up by
the NKR government is an important stimulus for business in Nagorno
Karabakh. The non-commercial organization carries out a number of
programmes, including granting privileged loans for expanding or
starting business. Last year 200 million drams was provided by
the state budget for this aim, in 2005 the sum improved to 800
million drams, of which 200 million was provided for viticulture,
cattle-farming and lease of agricultural machines each and 185 million
for industry, science and education, services. On April 15 of the
current year the executive adopted the decision N 187 determining
the directions of loaning and the amount of money for each region.
The second point of the decision instructs providing loans in the
sphere of viticulture to those farmers who will produce grapes on the
land owned by him or leased at a 25 per cent rate and who have been
registered as legal persons in conformity with the NKR legislation.
Last year the concern was expressed that the villagers should benefit
from loans (to solve this question it was necessary to solve the
problem of pledge in rural areas). The problem was partly solved. In
viticulture the government acts as guarantor for the first two years.
After two years (when the vineyard already produces harvest) the
vineyard is pledged. Besides, the guarantee of the head of the
regional administration is required in order for the programme of
loaning to involve mostly the villagers. “In the result of these and
other measures more than 60 per cent of the sum provided for business
loaning was directed at villagers,” said the executive director of
the fund for development of small and medium-size business.
AA. 16-05-2005 [spacer.gif]

Memory and Politics: Press Comments on Significance of Moscow Celebrations
Polish News Bulletin
May 19, 2005
Following last week’s celebrations in Moscow of the 60th anniversary of
the end of world war II, the press carries comments on the significance
of the event for Poland and on the controversies it raised, including
whether president Kwasniewski should have attended it, and whether
Poland was humiliated by Russia’s invitation for general Jaruzelski,
author of the martial law, or Vladimir Putin’s failure to mention
Poland as part of the victorious anti-Nazi coalition. – Maciej Letowski
commentator, Tygodnik Solidarnosc
We have a sense of failure and humiliation. Even those who wanted
president Kwasniewski to go to Moscow are disappointed today, as
they had hoped for more. While we cannot change the humiliation, we
can change the policy that resulted in it. Poland is a country that
will not get anything for granted. We owe both successes (Ukraine)
as well as failures (some provisions of the constitutional treaty) to
our activity. Effective in the former case, ineffective in the latter.
There were two ways to make sure that president Kwasniewski would be
seated in the front row in Moscow. Putin reminded us of the first
one by decorating general Jaruzelski, and the Russian TV did so
by broadcasting, for the 100th time, The Four in a Tank and a Dog
[a popular 70s’ TV series showing world war II from the communist
perspective]. We rejected that path in 1989. We should have paved
our way to the Red Square ourselves, or stayed at home.
For politicians, history is a toolbox from which they pick only
what fits their current policies. On May 9, president Putin showed,
referring to history, what were his goals and ambitions. He wants
Russia to be treated by the world as a global power equal to the US,
China, Japan, and the EU. Hence the invited guests were seated not in
accordance with their importance in 1945 but in 2005. Can a country
whose gross national product is the size of that of the Netherlands
seriously nurse such ambitions? Putin is aware of Russia’s weakness,
so he is seeking a leverage to strengthen his country’s potential.
One such leverage is, for instance, Russian-German reconciliation.
The recent Bild interview shows that the time for which Putin and
Schroeder have common sentiment is the beautiful 19th century.
There was and is no place for Poland either on the Red Square or in
Russia’s policy. Let us console ourselves, however, that there is
no place in it either for the Baltic states, because they are small,
nor for the UK, because it is America’s declared ally. If Poland is
a small country (in the Kremlin’s view) and a strategic partner of
the US, then Kwasniewski’s place was in the third row.
In the front row, in turn, there was place for the president of France,
whose contribution to defeating Nazi Germany was confined to a three
day-long uprising in a couple of Paris’s districts. But the Kremlin
needs France today, and France needs the Kremlin. In this vision
of history there is no room for Britain’s heroic and lone fight
from September 1939 to 1941, just as there is no place for the UK
in Moscow’s policy today. Here is why Tony Blair decided to stay in
Moscow. The elections, after all, were but a pretext.
If there is anyone in Poland who still does not understand Russia’s
policy, the May 9 celebrations were a god lesson. Those vying for
power in Poland must draw practical consequences from that lesson,
and more far-reaching ones than just a simple decision whether or
not to go to Moscow, because that is a crowning of political thought,
not its substitute.
“It was necessary to go to manifest our position,” “the absent are
always in the wrong,” Kwasniewski argued. Today we already know that
the absent (Lithuania and Estonia on the one hand, Georgia on the
other) were quite in the right. What is more, they managed to send the
right message to the global public. The small states’ tough position
was noted and awarded by the European public opinion and the EU leaders
(Verheugen’s and Borell’s speeches). President Bush went to Moscow
through Riga, and on Monday night was already in Tbilisi. On May 9,
the CNN and BBC cameras were both on the Red Square as well as in
the capitals of the countries that had rejected Moscow’s invitation.
That means that Kwasniewski had a choice. If he had stayed, Poland’s
prestige would not have been harmed. What is more, his beautiful
speech (no irony here) would have been heard not only by the Polish
TV viewers. Putin failed to notice Kwasniewski’s presence in Moscow.
He did notice general Jaruzelski’s. He shook hands with him longer
and more cordially, and decorated him for ? well, there is a dispute
here. The kind-hearted say that for his role in overcoming the
Pomeranian Wall in 1945. The sceptics that for suppressing the peaceful
Solidarity uprising in 1981 and the 1968 excursion to Czechoslovakia
? as Czech president Vaclav Klaus and many western commentators said.
Today the mistakes that we made in the recent months have become
clear. Kwasniewski announced too early that he would go to Moscow. He
announced his decision before acquainting himself with the schedule of
the celebrations, and before the Kremlin answered questions about the
Ribbentrop-Molotov pact, Yalta, and Katyn. Acting hastily, he made
things easier for the Russian foreign ministry, and more difficult
for us and our Baltic neighbours. Hurrying is something you simply
do not do in dealing with Russia.
It is also perfectly clear that we made a mistake ? not for the
first time ? by not coordinating our actions with others. Having
received the invitation from Moscow, Poland forgot, for instance,
about Lithuania, though, for historical and political reasons, it
should have remembered. Nor did the Polish diplomacy pay any attention
to Latvia, so close to us historically. Latvia, whose president Vaira
Vike-Freiberga showed more backbone and political instinct in the
recent weeks than anyone else. It is a pity the Polish president did
not stand at her side during that time. At the side of the three Baltic
states for whom Yalta and the Soviet occupation meant even greater
suffering than for Poland. We do not always have to present our wounds
to the world. It is sometimes better to give the floor to others.
Russia sensed a “Polish conspiracy” in the Ukrainian orange
revolution. If Poland had contributed to president Bush’s meeting
with the leaders of the Baltic states, and it could have, one would
have been proud of the Polish diplomacy, and would have gladly read
comments in the Russian press about another “Polish plot.” Alas,
we were busy brooding over the wrongs done to us, forgetting that we
had already received our share of the world’s sympathy during last
year’s Warsaw Uprising celebrations.
It became clear once again that our Ukrainian success was rather
accidental. We made it to Kiev at the last moment, but failed to
make it to the GUAM (Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia, Moldova) summit in
Kishinev. Though invited, Kwasniewski did not go in order “not to
irritate Moscow.” [See “Wasted Opportunity: Kwasniewski’s Absence
from GUAM Summit in Kishinev Illogical and Incomprehensible” in the
May 5 issue of the PNB Weekend Supplement].
If Putin’s intention was to convince the world that Russia was a
global power, able to dictate its own vision of history to others,
he did not achieve his goal. Putin had to swallow a number of bitter
pills to have George Bush at the celebrations: from the US president’s
itinerary, to his condemnation of Russia’s annexation of the Baltic
states. While on May 9 the world televisions showed the Moscow
parade and fragments of Putin’s speech, they also featured extensive
historical reports about Stalin’s policy, the price of victory and its
consequences for the Central European nations. They showed interviews
with the presidents of Latvia or Georgia. They showed reports about
contemporary Russia, including the images of Khodorkovsky waiting for
his trial in an iron cage. Western reporters commented that the parade
resembled the Stalinist times, and that Russia lived in the past,
unable to critically and creatively interpret its history. In fact,
the celebrations weakened rather than strengthened Russia’s image in
the world.
Listening to the opposition, one could conclude that if Lech Kaczynski
or Donald Tusk had been in Kwasniewski’s place, they would not have
gone to Moscow. Even if that would have been be the right step,
it would have been insufficient. What the opposition should do is
critically and thoroughly review all the mistakes committed by the
Polish diplomacy in the recent months, and show how to avoid them in
the future.
Table. Poles on Moscow celebrations (percentages of replies)* Is it
good that president Kwasniewski went to Moscow good bad 42 42 Were the
celebrations a humiliation for Poland yes no 55 29 Did Kwasniewski’s
image suffer yes no no change 21 7 64 */ PBS, May 10, telephone poll,
500-strong representative adult sample; source: Gazeta Wyborcza
The recent events also showed that the rightwing had an excessive
tendency for cultivating historical politics. True, that is Poland’s
important advantage. But it does not make sense to reach for the
historical arguments at any occasion. It does not make sense to
remind the Germans about their crimes when negotiating tax policy,
nor the Russians about Katyn when talking about gas supplies. Those
are “last chance” arguments that should be used as a last resort,
when we really face the wall. – Ireneusz Krzeminski
sociologist, Warsaw University
There is no doubt that the May 9 celebrations in Moscow should become
an important impulse for thinking and acting in Poland’s politics. A
cynical vision of politics as rivalry for power and influence, a
legacy of communism, pushed to the background its other important
functions. As it now turns out, politics must not forget about
important social issues, this time related to the past and to the
society’s image in its own and others’ eyes.
The issue of the second world war and what happened afterwards
divided the Poles. Before we got used to the thought, there had
unexpectedly emerged the issue of different historical memories
in Poland and Germany. The Germans, until then humbly accepting
responsibility for the Nazi crimes, suddenly started raising the
issue of the suffering and losses they had incurred during the
post-war resettlements. Interestingly, they were addressing their
complaints not at the victorious Soviet Union, which had treated the
Germans cruelly, but at Poland and the Poles. We suddenly realised
that Poland and Germany hardly shared a common historical memory,
a very irritating realisation for the majority of Poles.
The Moscow celebrations had prompted a heated debate long before
they started. There is no doubt that Moscow’s symbolical gestures
and Putin’s failure to mention Poles’ wartime contribution will cause
indignation and irritation in Poland. And rightly, because they were
not accidental. President Putin should remember that Polish soldiers
participated in the battle of Berlin ? if only because the Soviet
authorities always celebrated that. The lack of mention was therefore
politically-motivated, showing that Russia was far more skilled than
Poland at using history in shaping up its international image. And
that historical interpretations were an important instrument for
Russian policymakers.
Poland’s justified indignation, on the other hand, is a result of
our own failure to implement a permanent strategy regarding the
symbols protecting Poland’s national interests. Since the beginning
of the Polish democracy, Poland’s image in Europe and the world was
something the politicians cared about only incidentally, when things
got really serious. And yet such moments were a result of long-time
processes and failures.
Above all, it should be remembered that, for the communist regime,
building and cementing a favourable image of Poland and the Poles in
the world was not an important priority, the ideas of internationalism
enjoying preference. The first Solidarity cabinets had, one could
say, more important things on their mind. Still, they did realise
the importance of promoting Poland’s favourable image. Under Jan
Krzysztof Bielecki, many debates were held in the government
spokesman’s office, and then in the government press office,
about the need for developing a strategy of Poland’s promotion,
defalsifying its image, and promoting knowledge about Poland’s past
and present. Little came out of it. One of the main obstacles was the
fact that the successive cabinets and successive presidents lacked
a long-term vision of Poland and its presence in the world. That is
especially true for president Kwasniewski.
There is no doubt that the president found himself in a very
inconvenient situation because Russia’s unsympathetic ? to say the
least ? position towards Poland had been signalled long before the
May 9 anniversary. The opposition had also made its clear quite early
that it believed the president should not go. Kwasniewski thus had at
least three months to develop initiatives that would clearly present
the Polish perspective on the end of the war. He could have organised
a number of politically significant events and initiatives that,
perhaps, would have even forced president Putin to present a truer
vision of the past. Yet Kwasniewski, while rejecting the rightwing
opposition’s ? quite justified ? objections, failed to develop even
a single initiative that would have, loudly and clearly, though
not necessarily polemically, convey to the world the Polish vision
of the end of the war and its consequences. And would have been an
opportunity to not so much remind but tell Europe about our experience
of the past. After all, the European Parliament’s recent rejection of
the motion recognising the Katyn massacre of Polish officers by Soviet
Russia as genocide shows that even educated Europeans know very little
about the tragic history of Poland and Central and Eastern Europe as
a whole. Any initiative ? be it a conference of foreign ministers,
or a roadshow exhibition – would have been very welcome. What was
done was insufficient and came much too late.
One has an irresistible impression that the Polish diplomacy’s
participation in the discussing and promoting of Poland’s national
interests is very superficial. The EU constitution showed that
clearly: a deeper and more committed participation in the drafting
of the document would have produced less tensions and controversies
than actually occurred.
In the context of the European negotiations, it is clear that
the general image of Poland, its interests and values, may be very
important in the negotiations on specific issues. Nursing that image,
and especially the image of the past, telling the world about our
specific experiences ? is a first-rate task for Polish policy,
not only foreign one. Communism’s cynical politics of power proved
quite insufficient in the long run: symbols and public perceptions are
always decisive for the course of things in this world. We should draw
conclusions from that. After all, who knows better than the Poles that
national solidarity and its symbols can overcome violence and tanks.
Poland’s opening to world after 1989 forced us very quickly to
reconsider our own past. That concerned in the first place the
Polish-Jewish relations and the horrible truth about Polish crimes
against the Jews, and those against outlawed Germans. Poles still find
it difficult to acknowledge the various ignoble acts committed against
defenceless Germans in the immediate post-war period. But the most
complicated of all is the issue of Polish-Soviet and Polish-Russian
relations. The fundamental and obvious for most Poles truth that
liberation from under German occupation was the beginning of Soviet
enslavement and Poland’s subsequent dependence on the Soviet Union,
is not being questioned today even by the most fervent post-communist
politicians. At the same time, it is something exotic not only for
the authoritarian, imperialistic pro-Putin elites but also for the
majority of Russians. That cannot be easily changed. – Piotr Pacewicz
Gazeta Wyborcza
The whole national debate declining the word “humiliation” a hundred
ways is harmful and unwise.
It is understandable why the politicians have joined it. Why did
Donald Tusk, standing at the foot of the Westerplatte former military
base in Gdansk [where the first shots on September 1, 1939 were
fired] ask rhetorically “Whom are paying homage to, Mr. President?”
suggesting that Kwasniewski would pay homage to ex-KGB officer Putin?
Because the PO leader is trying to harm Kwasniewski’s image and outbid
the Kaczynski brothers, whose Law and Justice had overtaken the PO
in the polls, in anti-Russian rhetoric.
One bets euro against roubles that Tusk understands perfectly well
Kwasniewski’s political calculation to go to Moscow, understands
the pros and cons, and, as a decent man, knows that he should not be
exploiting the Westerplatte for his own political ends.
The worse thing is that the media too succumbed to the mood of the
moment, and as a result the whole nation felt humiliated. A poll
conducted by Gazeta on the day following the Moscow celebrations showed
four in 10 Poles thinking that Kwasniewski had done right by going. At
the same time, 55 percent said that Poland had been humiliated.
There is a sense of bitterness as if the Poles expected that our
version of history and our contribution to the ultimate victory over
the Third Reich would be appreciated by Putin. That in a crucial
moment of his speech Putin would address Kwasniewski and thank him
for the Polish-Russian brotherhood of arms.
It is perhaps better that he did not because in Putin’s version of
history Poles fought only on the eastern front. He might actually
have said something nasty about the Home Army or those Poles fighting
alongside the western allies.
Imagining that Putin would appreciate the Poles was unreasonable. In
his Russia, the Poles had been cast as such villains that the
anniversary of the Kremlin’s liberation from Polish forces in the 17th
century replaced the anniversary of the October Revolution as Russia’s
most important official holiday The post-Soviet man still regards
the Poles as revolted subjects of the former empire, especially after
Aleksander Kwasniewski helped Ukraine separate itself from Russia.
It is the victory of the orange revolution that was the real
humiliation for the imperial, arrogant policy that Putin had carried
out in Ukraine, supporting Yanukovych and defending falsified
elections. He threw his whole authority at stake ? and lost.
Putin’s words in Moscow were a pathetic version of the imperial
aspirations of a country that not so long ago had sent the first
man into space and ruled half of the globe, and whose gross national
product per head today is sharply lower than Poland’s.
Can such Russia, such Putin humiliate the Poles? Does the fact that
his anachronistic speech did not mention the name “Poland” affronts
our national dignity?
Putin was unable to prevent president Kwasniewski’s demonstrative
gestures, who, paying homage to the victims of Stalinism in Moscow,
tried to tell to the world the truth about history. It is a pity he
did so in a clumsy way, that his speech at the Don Cemetery was not
translated into Russian, but the Polish protests were still noticed
by the world press on par with those of the Baltic states and Georgia.
Let us not get carried away, let us not succumb to the typical Polish
inferiority complex, let us not create new ones. We are no longer a
pawn in Russia’s game with the West.
We are a middle country, and our policy has to be flexible, looking
for opportunities. We did wonderfully in Ukraine, less so in Moscow,
but if Kwasniewski had not gone, Poland’s position in Russia and the
world would not have been better.
And national dignity is something the Poles should be looking for
elsewhere than in Vladimir Putin’s speeches. – Russia Has Disregard
for the Weak
Russia is not interested in good relations with Poland. What can be
done to change that?
“I don’t think this cabinet and this president can really do anything
about it,” says Bartlomiej Sienkiewicz, eastern analyst and former
deputy head of the Eastern Studies Centre (OSW), a Warsaw-based in
Gazeta Wyborcza. “The leftwing’s mandate has been exhausted. Not
because it made some cardinal mistakes, but because it has been
unable to say out loud that there is a conflict between Poland and
Russia. The causes of that conflict lie with the Russian s.”
“For Russia, Poland is not an equal partner. They treat us as a small
country that needs not be reckoned with. Secondly, what for us is
a fundamental national interest, i.e. the EU common foreign policy,
is a threat for them. The third issue is history. Our sense that we
fell victim to two totalitarian regimes is unacceptable for Russia. If
only because of potential compensation claims, but also because it
would equalling Stalin with Hitler.”
What does the ostentatious Russian-German reconciliation mean for
Poland?
“It is worrying because it approaches a situation where other
countries’ interests are not taken into consideration. To some extent,
it is doubtless a result of excellent personal communication between
chancellor Schroeder and president Putin, and the Christian Democrats’
potential electoral victory in Germany could change a lot here.”
So is there no good news?
“We have to get used to the thought that we’re doomed to conflict
with Russia. That there’ll be differences, that our interests are
often divergent. We must talk about it openly, because the Russians
disregard the weak. And the key place for Polish-Russian relations
will be neither Warsaw nor Moscow, but Brussels.”
How is the EU supposed to help us?
“Our opportunity lies in the formulation and implementation of a common
EU foreign policy. For Russia it is a threat because it wants to deal
directly with the leading EU states, ignoring the smaller ones. The
Russians are also trying to treat the new member states differently
than the old ones. They’re controlling the Polish dairy plants,
and I haven’t hear about them controlling the German ones.”
“A common foreign policy would boost the significance of Poland and
the Baltic states. Only with the EU’s support will it be possible to
achieve ambitious goals in the east – democratise Belarus and cement
the reforms in Ukraine.”
“The strengthening of the Commission’s and the Parliament’s position
is also favourable for us. We brought the Parliament over to our side
during the Ukrainian revolution, and we recently scored a small success
in the Commission too – the project of a Baltic pipeline linking
Russia with western Europe wasn’t recognised as a priority for the EU.”
What about the US, Poland main ally?
“We should nurse no illusions here. Our interests and objectives
are different. For the US, relations with Russia are too important
to put them at risk because of the Polish-Russian dispute. In other
words, the US won’t do anything to boost Polish chicken exports to
Russia. That’s something only the EU can help us in.”

Erdogan: Baseless Decisions On So-called Armenian Genocide Are Against Human Rights And Supremacy Of Law
Turkish Press
Published: 5/18/2005
WARSAW (AA) – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said
regarding so-called Armenian genocide claims, “decisions of
uninterested parliaments which were made upon baseless lobbying
activities and lack any proof are wrong in terms of human rights and
supremacy of law.”
Erdogan took the floor at the third plenary session on “European
Architecture” during 3rd Summit of Council of Europe (COE) Heads of
State and Government in Poland on Tuesday.
Assessing so-called Armenian genocide allegations, Erdogan said, “we
have set an action plan regarding the incidents happened during Ottoman
Empire period in 1915. Turkish ruling and opposition parties clearly
stated that decisions of related or uninterested parliaments on the
issue without any proof will not have positive consequences.” “Turkey
has opened all of its archives. More than 1 million documents were
classified so far. We are also opening our military archives. Armenia
shall open its all archives too. After all archives are opened,
historians, jurists and political scientists shall convene and work
on these archives and then present their studies to politicians. If a
decision is to be taken, it should be taken by politicians. Decisions
of uninterested parliaments made upon baseless lobbying activities
and lack any proof are wrong in terms of human rights and supremacy
of law,” he noted.
-COUNCIL OF EUROPE-
Erdogan said, “enlargement process in the EU which is also covering
a large part of COE should not create radical changes in principles
of COE. On the contrary, COE, which unites the whole of Europe on
common principles, should be a guide in basic areas and it should
prevent any division in Europe.” Erdogan noted, “we expect human
rights agency which will be established soon to develop cooperation
between COE and the EU.” Erdogan said, “Turkey supports Poland’s
suggestion to assign Jean-Claude Juncker, Premier of Luxembourg,
to pursue a study on future relations between EU and COE.”

RUSSIAN ARCHEOLOGISTS NOT ALLOWED TO NAKHICHEVAN
Pan Armenian News
18.05.2005 03:06
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Whole Azerbaijan Union protested against
the second visit of the Russian archeological expedition headed by
orientalist Andrey Polyakov to Nakhichevan. In this view some Azeri
officials held a meeting with journalists on May 17 and adopted
a statement. Chairman Agil Samedbeily said that “passing off as
archeological expedition a group of people in 2004 as if looking for
the Noah’s Ark climbed the Turkish part of the Ararat Mountain and
hoisted a Russian flag there. The same group visited Azerbaijan to get
familiarized with the ancient cultural monuments. They took photos and
then published materials humiliating and offending the national dignity
of Azerbaijan. This group was planning digs in Nakhichevan in order
to erect a monument to biblical forefather Noah. With the efforts of
the Nakhichevani authorities, scientists, a number of deputies as well
as ministerial officials the group failed to carry out their plan.”

‘Powerless’ candidates set to take on dominant lists
By Adnan El-Ghoul
The Daily Star, Lebanon
18 May, 2005
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
On the campaign trail
BEIRUT: Former Premier Omar Karami, Zghorta MP Suleiman Franjieh,
General Michel Aoun and many other Lebanese politicians all seem
“powerless” in face of the present electoral alliances: Amal with
Hizbulllah, and Saad Hariri’s Future Movement with Walid Jumblatt’s
Progressive Socialist Party. Described as “bulldozers” by the Lebanese
public, these alliances, created collectively or separately, are
likely to prevent the possibility of genuine political reform in the
near future.
Nevertheless, many of these “powerless” candidates have decided to
meet the challenge in order to truly reflect the voters’ ambitions
and choices.
In Beirut, sitting MPs Adnan Araqji, Beshara Merhej and former MP
Najah Wakim will run in the elections and are looking for support
from Al-Jamaa al-Islamiyya, which has no candidate in Beirut.
To confront Hariri, these political figures and others will concentrate
on exploiting apparent “gaps” in the list, and may attempt to incite
excluded Beiruti families against Hariri.
Another plan might be to attack the Hariri list’s two controversial
Christian candidates, Gebran Tueni and Solange Gemayel, portraying
them as the wrong people for the job, especially given Gemayel’s
recent statement following her uncontested victory, where she claimed
to have won “thanks to Ghattas Khoury’s withdrawal.”
Gemayel declared at the Maronite Patriarchate in Bkirki that she would
not commit herself politically to Hariri’s parliamentary bloc, and
she reiterated her opposition to all those she considers “strangers”
– an old civil- war phrase that might be considered “provocative
language” to many Muslims. Critics say Gemayel should have waited
until Hariri’s list had passed the election test before making such
“embarrassing” statements.
The Armenian community in Beirut is also unsatisfied with Hariri’s
alliances, which “ignored the Armenian political groups and selected
uncommitted members from their community.” In a news conference,
the Tashnag Party called on members and supporters to boycott the
elections and “stay at home on May 29.”
In the North, the “opposition” alliance formed by the Future Movement,
Qornet Shehwan, the Lebanese Forces and the Tripoli Bloc is very
close to announcing a final list, with potential members posing for
photographers Tuesday.
In face of this “powerful” coalition, Karami and Franjieh are
still considering their “final changes” before announcing their list
Thursday. Aoun is expected to be the “envisioned rescuer” and Al-Jamaa
al-Islamiyya the “badly needed catalyst to making up the difference.”
In the South, independent candidates are running with little hope
of winning.
“We want to send a message, a political statement that we object to
the confiscation of the people’s will,” said one leftist activist.
The Democratic Forum and the Democratic Left Movement are to field a
limited list of candidates in Nabatieh’s second electoral district;
they are considering whether to include Nadim Salim from the Democratic
Renewal Bloc and Ziad Aswad of the Free Patriotic Movement.
The Communist Party and the Democratic Labor Party led by Elias Abu
Rizk are forming separate lists of left-wing politicians who seem
unable to unite even now, in these “hard times.”
The traditional Asaad family is also plagued by division, with a father
running against a son, and a distant cousin running against both.
Former Parliament Speaker Kamel al-Assad will compete for the Shiite
seat in the South’s second district with his son Ahmad and two other
candidates representing Amal and Hizbullah.
In the Chouf and Baabda-Aley, Aoun, Talal Arslan, Dory Chamoun’s
National Liberal Party and the Syrian Social Nationalist Party are
still struggling to conclude a meaningful alliance to oppose Jumblatt
and his alliance with the LF.

FEATURE-Syria’s stateless Kurds hope for new rights
By Lin Noueihed
05/16/05 08:00 ET
DAMASCUS (Reuters) – Ismael Hami is a foreigner in the country of
his birth. He cannot vote, run for office or register property in his
name. A pink card stamped “not for travel” is one of a few documents
proving he even exists.
But all that could soon change for Hami, who says he is one of an
estimated 200,000 stateless Kurds living in Syria.
Rights activists and Western diplomats say Syria is mulling a solution
to the status of Kurds in the mainly Arab state. Word is spreading
and cautious hopes are rising among the stateless that they could
finally get citizenship.
“There are rumors that changes are coming,” said Hami, an official
in the small but active Syrian Kurdish Yikiti party.
“They have promised a solution to the stateless Kurds issue. We
have despaired of Syrian policy but hope they reform even if it is
a response to international pressure, not people’s wishes.”
Decades of Kurdish discontent in Syria’s northeastern governorate
of Hasake, where Kurds say a 1962 census omitted 120,000 of their
number, fueled riots that swept several towns in March 2004, after
a brawl between Arab and Kurdish supporters of rival soccer teams in
the town of Kameshli escalated.
The clashes, in which some 30 people were killed, reflected
unprecedented tension between Kurds and the state in Syria, which,
like neighboring Turkey and Iran worries Kurdish autonomy in northern
Iraq could inspire separatism on its soil.
Syria’s estimated 2 million Kurds, many with family ties in Turkey
and Iraq, say they seek rights within the country where they make up
around 10 percent of the population, not a separate state.
They want citizenship — denied to those classified as stateless but
required for higher state education and employment — and the right
to teach and publish in their own language.
UNDER PRESSURE
President Bashar al-Assad, whose country is under U.S. pressure to
reform, had pledged to look into statelessness, raising hopes of an
end to the problem.
In a move Syrian Kurdish activists hope heralds wider reform, Assad
pardoned 312 Syrian Kurds accused of taking part in last year’s riots,
to enhance “national unity.”
“They released some of the detainees. This was a positive move that
all the Syrian movements welcomed,” said Lukman Oso, an activist in
the Kurdish Leftist Party in Syria.
“We are hearing through leaks to the press that they may give stateless
Kurds identity. We would welcome any such move as positive but we
have seen nothing on the ground so far.”
Kurdish activists say they wish to see the stateless Kurds issue
addressed, not least because some have no rights at all.
The offspring of stateless Kurds who married Syrians over generations
when those unions were not officially recognized, are now caught in
legal limbo.
Kurds estimate there are some 75,000 of these so-called undeclared
living in Syria today.
Hami was recently allowed to register his marriage to a Syrian citizen,
finally giving their three children official recognition, if only as
foreign residents living in Syria.
The Kurdish issue is sensitive in Syria, eliciting little official
comment or sympathy among the general public.
But Western diplomats and Syrian activists say they expect the
government to naturalize tens of thousands of Kurds.
“It will happen slowly, slowly. They will probably announce 30,000
then after a few months another 10,000 and so on, but of course they
will not give citizenship to all,” said Ayman Abdel Nour, an engineer
and reform activist.
“They will only give citizenship to those who deserve it, only after
they study their files because many of these people actually come
from Turkey or Iraq, not Syria.”
LONG HISTORY
Kurds have lived in the mountains that straddle Iraq, Turkey, Syria
and Iran, an area some Kurdish nationalists refer to as Kurdistan,
for centuries. Some Syrian Kurds have held senior official posts.
Some Kurds in Syria trace their roots back to one of the greatest
military leaders in the region’s history, Saladin.
A Kurd from modern-day Iraq, Saladin led a Muslim army that vanquished
the Crusaders and reconquered Jerusalem in the 12th century. Saladin
died in Damascus where he is buried.
While Iraqi Kurds were repressed by Saddam Hussein, who gassed the
Kurdish town of Halabja in 1988, and Turkey battled Kurdish separatists
in its southeast during the 1980s and 1990s, Syria has rarely clashed
with its own minority.
Ruled by the secular Baath party, it has traditionally stressed
national unity, avoiding references to its many minorities, including
Assyrians, Armenians and other Christians, Druze, Kurds, Shi’ites
and Assad’s own small Alawite sect.
But some Kurdish political activists accuse the state of trying to
stamp out their distinct cultural identity and dilute the Kurdish
character of the northeastern Jazeera — a fertile plain rich in oil
and gas that Syria’s command economy needs.

ARKA News Agency
May 13 2005
Armenian President discusses constitutional reforms in Armenia with
PACE Monitoring Commission’s Reporters
Armenian-US security relations good: John Evans
Regional international relations program for young civil servants
implemented in Armenia
NKR citizen suspected in spying for Azerbaijan arrested in Nagorno
Karabakh
NKR Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs: one of the main goals of the
Karabakh diplomacy is to achieve transformation of armistice into
final and stable peace
*********************************************************************
ARMENIAN PRESIDENT DISCUSSES CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS IN ARMENIA WITH
PACE MONITORING COMMISSION’S REPORTERS
YEREVAN, May 13. /ARKA/. Armenian President Robert Kocharyan and PACE
Monitoring Commission’s Reporters Yerzhi Yaskernia and George
Columbier as well as the Commission Secretary Bony Theofilova
discussed constitutional reforms in Armenia on Friday. According to
Presidential Press service, the sides paid attention to regional
issues and Karabakh settlement process. M.V. -0–
*********************************************************************
ARMENIAN-US SECURITY RELATIONS GOOD: JOHN EVANS
YEREVAN, May 13. /ARKA/. Armenia and the USA have formed good
relations in the security sphere, US ambassador to Armenia John
Evans. According to him, these relations will be developing and
expanding. This cooperation is chiefly formed within NATO, but direct
bilateral relations will be developed as well, he said. Ambassador
Evans specified that a group of Armenian specialists recently visited
Armenia to conduct a strategic study of direct Armenian-American
relations in the security sphere. Another example is, according to
him, the US financial aid to Armenia’s defense sphere. The USA is
happy that Armenia is cooperating with it in various spheres – in
ratification of antiterrorist conventions or in the dispatch of
non-combatant troops to Iraq, Evans said. He said that Armenia is
cooperating with the USA in frontier-guarding. Armenia’s borders are
not violated by those trying to smuggle weapons of mass destruction,
Evans said. P.T. -0–
*********************************************************************
REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS PROGRAM FOR YOUNG CIVIL SERVANTS
IMPLEMENTED IN ARMENIA
YEREVAN, May 13. /ARKA/. Regional program of international relations
for young civil servants of Armenia and Georgia is being implemented
in Yerevan. Daniel Warner, Deputy Director, Geneva Institute of
International Relations (HEI), said that the goal of the program is
affording civil servants the opportunity to improve the knowledge of
international relations as well as contributing to regional
cooperation. He reported that since 2001 biannual trainings have been
held in Tbilisi for representatives of the three Transcaucasian
countries, and the first training in Yerevan was held last October.
Warner also said that two participants in the program from each
country that demonstrate their capabilities for being leaders will
spend a week in Geneva, where they will hold meetings with
representatives of the Government and of various international
organizations. The program was organized by HEI in cooperation with
the Swiss CIMERA organization, with the sponsorship of the Swiss
Development and Cooperation Agency. The program is being implemented
under the auspices of the RA Foreign Office. Sixty Armenian civil
servants from the RA Central Bank, RA Ministry of Trade and Economic
Development, RA Foreign Office and Ra Supervisory Chamber have so far
been involved in the program. P.T. -0–
*********************************************************************
NKR CITIZEN SUSPECTED IN SPYING FOR AZERBAIJAN ARRESTED IN NAGORNO
KARABAKH
STEPANAKERT, May 13. /ARKA/. As a result of joint manhunt launched by
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic National Security Service and Police, a
citizen of the republic suspected in spying for Azerbaijan has been
arrested in Nagorno Karabakh. Name of the suspect is still kept
secret. According to NKR National Security Service, the arrested has
been in contact with Azerbaijani special services providing
information containing state secret to them. NKR Prosecutor General
Office launched a legal action charging the arrested man with
espionage (Article 299 of NKR Penal Code), carrying from 10 to 15
years in jail. M.V. -0–
*********************************************************************
NKR DEPUTY MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS: ONE OF THE MAIN GOALS OF THE
KARABAKH DIPLOMACY IS TO ACHIEVE TRANSFORMATION OF ARMISTICE INTO
FINAL AND STABLE PEACE
YEREVAN, May 13. /ARKA/. One of the main goals of the Karabakh
diplomacy is to achieve transformation of armistice into final and
stable peace. According to NKR MFA, the NKR Deputy Minister of
Foreign Affairs Masis Mailyan told about it in regard with the
regular anniversary of armistice in the zone of Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict concluded on May 12, 1994 through the mediation of Russia.
According to him, the achievement of ceasefire became the only result
in the process of peaceful settlement of the conflict. According to
Mailyan, support of the regime of ceasefire, notwithstanding any
separate facts of its violation, mostly are preconditioned by the
fact that the agreement is signed by the representatives of the
authorities of the three parties in conflict, namely Azerbaijan,
Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia.
Mailyan was satisfied with the fact that for the recent time the
situation on the front line between the Armed Forces of
Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan became stable. According to him,
significant role in it played the “firm position of international
mediators, who stated about inadmissibility of escalation of tension,
as well as monitoring of a line of demarcation conducted regularly by
the OSCE mission”. A.H.-0–

Armenian MP raps coalition over draft constitutional reform
Noyan Tapan news agency
13 May 05
YEREVAN
“The draft of constitutional reforms proposed by the ruling coalition
reflects the interests of the incumbent president,” the chairman of
the National Democratic Bloc, MP Arshak Sadoyan, told a news
conference today.
He said the draft retains all presidential powers and is only intended
to “pull the wool over Europe’s eyes”.
Sadoyan said it was obvious that the coalition, dictated by the
president, would continue pursuing the same strategy and that the
draft being put on the referendum would not contain any serious
changes. Namely, the president will unilaterally determine the
structure of the government and main directions of the state’s foreign
and domestic policy.
The president will effectively be able to appoint and dismiss the
prime minister, the prosecutor-general and other senior officials. The
president will also retain all control pillars to influence the work
of the justice council, etc.
Arshak Sadoyan believes that such an “evil reform” of the constitution
will turn Armenia into a state with backward “Asian” dictatorship. He
said his party would try to introduce its own draft of reforms.
“We are calling on all political forces, public organizations and
private individuals to join their efforts and say a collective ‘no’ to
these treacherous constitutional reforms,” he said.

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
May 12 2005
AZERBAIJAN DIASPORA BECOMES MORE ACTIVE IN CANADA
[May 12, 2005, 15:06:32]
As was informed from the State Committee on Work with the
Azerbaijanis Living in Foreign Countries, employees of the Committee
were in official trip to Canada where have met representatives of the
Azerbaijan communities which are carrying out activity in the cities
of Ottawa, Toronto, Hamilton and Montreal.
In Canada, where are more than 60 thousand Azerbaijanis, some 10
Diaspora organizations are functioning. The Azerbaijan cultural and
educational center, Association of the Canada-Azerbaijan Cooperation,
Association of Azerbaijanis of Quebec, the Canada -Azerbaijan Chamber
of Commerce, Association of the Canadian Azerbaijanis, Association of
the Azerbaijan-Canadian friendship and other societies carry out
active work directed on bringing of the right voice of Azerbaijan up
to the public, the government and parliament of Canada, and also on
strengthening of links of our compatriots living here with
Motherland, regularly informing them on political processes in our
country.
Carrying out now activity in Canada, the Diaspora organizations
closely cooperate with local Turkish communities and media. Due to
this, the Azerbaijan cultural and educational center has achieved
opening in newspaper “Canada Turk’ of special page issued by large
circulation under the name `Voice of Caucasus’.
The Center has published in a number of newspapers and magazines of
Canada of numerous articles about the Azerbaijan realities, has
released a book titled `Azerbaijan: The Land of Hope’, narrating
about aggression of Armenia against the country. Besides Canada, this
book has been distributed in several countries of the world.
In the near future, it is stipulated to open the Azerbaijan Sunday
schools in Canada, carrying out of Days of Culture of Azerbaijan. The
State Committee will assist maintenance of these schools with
teaching aids.