Reader’s Digest Publishes Article By Ms. Line Abrahamian

PRESS RELEASE
Armenian General Benevolent Union Inc.
Dr. Rita Kuyumjian
Chairperson
805, Manoogian street
Ville St-Laurent, QC H4N 1Z5
Tel: 514-748-2428
Fax: 514-748-6307
E-mail: [email protected]
Website:
Montreal, September 12, 2006 – AGBU Montreal is proud to announce that
Reader’s Digest of Canada, the English publication with the widest
circulation of over 6 million copies, has published an article in its
October issue on the Armenian Genocide, authored by Ms. Line Abrahamian.
Ms. Abrahamian is associate editor of the Reader’s Digest. She is an
active participant in the recently-announced AGBU Nor Jrabert repopulation
committee.
The article is featured on pages 62-69 of the publication. It is preceded
on pages 56-61 by another article which consists of an interview with the
famous actor Orlando Bloom in which he describes his participation in Andrew
Goldberg’s documentary “The Armenian Genocide”, which was showcased this
past spring at AGBU Montreal and was also received by Canada’s Prime
Minister, courtesy of the AGBU.
In addition, the Reader’s Digest website features another sidebar article on
the topic available only on the site, written also by Ms. Abrahamian
containing rare interviews with Turkish intellectuals providing a unique
perspective on the Armenian Genocide and its impact on Turkish society and
its institutions of today. The article can be found at
e.php. The topic of the
Armenian Genocide is thus getting premium coverage.
AGBU Montreal congratulates Ms. Abrahamian on this unique achievement of
getting such widespread coverage of the topic in various media. AGBU
Montreal also urges its members and the Armenian public to support this
initiative, by purchasing and distributing the publication, by writing
letters to the editor and, for residents outside of Canada, by ordering and
distributing copies through the foreign order feature of the same website.
For further information, please contact the AGBU at 514-748-2428 or at
[email protected]

www.agbumontreal.org

Chirac To Visit Armenian Genocide Monument

CHIRAC TO VISIT ARMENIAN GENOCIDE MONUMENT
United Press International
Sept 19 2006
PARIS, Sept. 19 (UPI) — French President Jacques Chirac plans to visit
a monument to the victims of Turkish genocide on a trip to Armenia.
Turkey has been unwilling to acknowledge that thousands of Armenians
were killed during World War I.
A Turkish newspaper, The New Anatolian, reporting on Chirac’s plans,
referred to the massacre as “the so-called Armenian genocide” and
said the president’s trip could be an additional strain on relations
between France and Turkey.
Chirac is scheduled to arrive in Armenia Sept. 29. He and President
Robert Kocharian are expected to discuss Armenian genocide claims and
the relationship between France and Armenia, The New Anatolian said.

State Is Pushed To Sell Itself

STATE IS PUSHED TO SELL ITSELF
By Evelyn Iritani, Times Staff Writer
Los Angeles Times, CA
September 18, 2006
A bill on the governor’s desk mandates a new effort to boost foreign
investment and trade.
California produces some of the world’s finest foods, movies and
software, but unlike other states, it has no outposts abroad to market
its goods to eager buyers.
Unless you count Armenia, a former part of the Soviet Union, where
the trade office is funded by donations from California’s Armenian
American community.
ADVERTISEMENT The Golden State exported more than $116 billion
worth of goods last year and handled 40% of the country’s container
traffic. After Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger took office in 2003, he
vowed to be a “super-salesman” for the state, whose $1.6-trillion
economy ranks among the world’s largest.
Now, a group of lawmakers and business leaders is prodding the governor
and the state to get back to promoting the state’s industries.
Senate Majority Leader Gloria Romero (D-Los Angeles) successfully
pushed legislation requiring the state Business, Transportation
and Housing Agency to develop a strategy for attracting foreign
investment and trade. That bill, which was passed by a wide margin,
has been sent to the governor’s office.
Schwarzenegger has not taken a position on the legislation, said
Darrel Ng, a spokesman for his office.
The state once staffed a dozen trade offices abroad, including in
Tokyo, Shanghai and London. But during the budget crisis of 2003, the
Legislature shut down the California Technology, Trade and Commerce
Agency, which had a $13-million budget and 91 employees, and closed
11 of the 12 outposts.
State Sen. Jack Scott, a Democrat from the Pasadena area, which has
a large Armenian American community, was able to save the Armenia
office because it was privately funded.
Romero said state officials needed to determine whether they should
reopen offices abroad and if so, how they should be managed and
funded. The state also needs to look at the effects of tax policies
and other regulations on foreign companies, she said.
“We have been flying blind in California,” she said.
“We don’t have a trade policy.”
Garrett Ashley, a former Schwarzenegger aide whom the governor picked
to head the state’s international trade efforts, said California has
suffered because it lacked the resources to sell itself overseas.
“I think there’s no question that a state the size of California
and the significance of California needs to have a presence in the
international business arena and a way to promote itself,” Ashley said.
Jock O’Connell, a trade consultant in Sacramento, agrees that the
state’s trade strategy needs an overhaul. But he said foreign trade
offices were a waste of taxpayers’ money because they were too
difficult to manage from afar and often became politicized.
“The common point of view in the private sector is these trade offices
serve political, not commercial, purposes,” he said.
The state would be better off using its resources to modernize
California’s highway system, railroads and ports, O’Connell
said. Airports should be a high priority because more than 50% of
the state’s exports, including electronic components and perishable
commodities, are shipped by air.
The governor has asked voters to approve a $20-billion transportation
bond measure in November that includes $3.1 billion to facilitate
the movement of goods.
On trade missions to Japan, Israel and China, the governor used his
celebrity to hawk California wine, produce and other products. The
governor is taking another group of officials and executives to Mexico
in November.
After Schwarzenegger’s Asia trip, Air China signed multimillion-dollar
contracts with United Airlines to have its San Francisco maintenance
facilities service the Chinese airline’s Boeing 747 and 777 engines,
according to the governor’s office. Schwarzenegger also helped persuade
Virgin America, the new budget U.S. airline partly owned by British
entrepreneur Richard Branson, to locate its headquarters in the Bay
Area hub.
Famima, one of Asia’s biggest convenience store chains, decided to
expand into California after its chief executive saw a billboard in
Tokyo featuring Schwarzenegger, the governor’s office said.
In two years, Famima has opened six of its high-end convenience stores
in Southern California and plans to have a bunch more in place by
year end.
But some foreign employers have recently left the state for better
offers, citing high operating costs and taxes. Last year, Nissan Motor
Co. announced it was moving its U.S. headquarters, which employed
1,300 people, from Gardena to Nashville. Carlos Ghosn, chief executive
of the Japanese auto firm, said Tennessee’s “favorable business and
taxation climate” played a role in the decision to move.
The Organization for International Investment, a Washington-based
lobbyist for foreign firms, has asked the California Franchise Tax
Board to amend its “discriminatory” policy of taxing transactions
between those firms and their California-based subsidiaries, including
royalty payments and interest on loans.
The board has agreed to consider that petition at its meeting
Wednesday.
“I think this is a case of the state sending a mistaken signal of
hostility to these companies when it’s not intending to,” said Todd
Malan, executive director of the group.
State officials argue that they are only trying to collect taxes on
income that is legitimately tied to business within California.
But Alex Spitzer, senior vice president of taxes for the
U.S. subsidiary of Switzerland-based Nestle, said the state’s tax
policies were one reason his company decided to put a $359-million
factory in Indiana instead of California. The food giant employs
7,500 people in California.
The disputed tax policy, he said, “is reflective of the attitude
California projects that, ‘We love the jobs but not the businesses
that create them.’ ”
* [email protected]

Human Rights Ombudsman Believes Babajanian’s Ruling Too Tough

HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN BELIEVES BABAJANIAN’S RULING TOO TOUGH
Panorama.am
13:10 14/09/06
Human Rights Ombudsman Armen Harutunyan is concerned with the recent
violations against reporters which he considers serious threat against
freedom of speech.
“Freedom of speech is one of the layers of democracy,” he told a
press conference today. Harutunyan issued a statement recently asking,
“not to ignore the incidents and discover the perpetrators.”
Asked by a reporter if he believes that the court ruling on Arman
Babajanyan’s was too tough, he ombudsman said, “I do not think his
act deserved four years of imprisonment.”
However, the ombudsman admits he cannot take any other measures
than to include the information in annual reports or other reports
addressed to international organizations. “It is dictated by law on
human rights ombudsman,” he said.

Armenia And Bulgaria Signed Statement On Further Development Of Mili

ARMENIA AND BULGARIA SIGNED STATEMENT ON FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF MILITARY COOPERATION
PanARMENIAN.Net
13.09.2006 16:10 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Since September 11 Armenian Defense Minister Serge
Sargsyan is in Bulgaria on an official visit. During his meeting with
his Bulgarian counterpart Vesselin Bliznakov matters of strengthening
bilateral military cooperation were discussed. The Ministers
agreed to work jointly in democratic control over the armed forces,
working out the military budget and ensuring transparency of defense
planning. Sargsyan and Bliznakov also agreed to create conditions for
exchange of experience and retraining of personnel in higher military
education institutions of Bulgaria. The MOD heads signed a joint
statement on further development of bilateral military cooperation.
S. Sargsyan also met with Bulgarian President Georgy Parvanov,
visited the People’s Council, where he met with its Deputy Chair
Peter Beron and members of the Standing Parliamentary Commission
on Defense. The Armenian MOD head is also scheduled to visit the
National Military University and the military base of Graf Ignatievo
near Plovdiv. Meetings of working groups on Defense Planning and
Logistics were held in Sofia within the cooperation program of the
Defense Ministries of Armenia and Bulgaria, reports the Press Service
of the Armenian MFA.

BAKU: Chingiz Askerov: Azerbaijani IDPs Submitted Over 800 Complaint

CHINGIZ ASKEROV: AZERBAIJANI IDPS SUBMITTED OVER 800 COMPLAINTS TO THE EUROPEAN COURT AGAINST ARMENIA
APA – Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
12 Sen. 2006 15:33
“Some Azerbaijani politicians aim to get money from the Government
by appealing to the European Court”
Azerbaijan’s authorized representative at the European Court of Human
Rights Chingiz Askerov’s exclusive interview to the APA.
– How many appeals have the European Court received from Azerbaijan?
– Azerbaijan has submitted over 100 complaints to the European
Court. Great majority of these complaints were rejected at the
preliminary review. The Court is going to send notification to the
government related to nearly 200 complaints. The Azerbaijani government
received communication on 27 complaints. As a rule, the court appoints
a reporting judge to consider the received complaint. And the court
sends a notification to the government to clarify some questions. It
asks the responsible government whether there is an opportunity
to sign an agreement of reconciliation with the complainant. The
experience shows that there is much likelihood the communicated
complaints contain more cases on human rights violation. Decision
has been made on seven of 27 communicated complaints, and none of
them contained cases on human rights violation.
-What kind of damages do the complaints demand from the Government?
– Different damages are demanded in different countries related to the
violation of the rights protected under the European Convention on
Human Rights and Freedoms. As Azerbaijan is not in the list of with
“old democracy” countries, the demanded damages are not so high. Some
complaints are sent by persons engaged in political activity in
Azerbaijan.
The damages they demand from the Government are measured by 100
million euros. Common citizens claim reasonable damages from the
Government. They want their violated rights to be restored. But most
politicians aim at getting money from the Azerbaijani government by
appealing to the European Court.
-What articles of the Convention are claimed to be violated in the
appeals sent to the European Court from Azerbaijan?
-All of the complaints claim that the 6th article of the Convention
(right to a fair court) is violated. It is natural. According to
the 35th article of the Convention, an individual can appeal to
the European Court after having appealed to all court instances of
his country. Most complainants claim that their rights are violated
during trial hearings. Thus, not both sides can be satisfied with
the court decision.
Therefore, all complaints claim that the 6th article has been
violated. However, during the communication this claim is not made
often. All of the communications the court sent to the Azerbaijani
government are related to rights violations claimed to before 15
April, 2003 (after the Convention came to force) till 2003. We have
not received any communications related to violations after 2003.
-As you mentioned, most of the appeals sent by Azerbaijan are
rejected. What is the reason for that?
– The European Court said in one of the decisions against Azerbaijan
that all the local courts should be appealed before appealing to the
European Court. that is the main reason why mot of the complaints are
rejected. Thus, in most cases citizens complain to the European Court
directly of the decisions of the court of first instance and court
of appeal without appealing to the Supreme Court. In such cases,
the complaints are rejected. Another reason is that the complaints
do not show what rights protected under the Convention have been
violated. If an individual is dissatisfied with the court decision
it does not mean his right has been violated. The violation of the
6th article means violation of procedural rights.
An individual should precisely show what rights of the Convention
have been violated. The European Court will reject a common complaint.
-The European Court delays considering the complaints for years. The
Court is very busy. The 14th protocol has been adopted to carry our
reforms. What amendments are expected to be made to the 14th protocol?
– A reporting judge is appointed to review a complaint received
by the Court. After that procedure, the Committee composed of five
judges reconsiders the complaint and decides whether or not it will
be communicated. Another innovation is that the complainant should
substantiate that he suffered great damages. If the damages are
not great, the European court might reject the complaint. The third
innovation is related to the improvement of controlling mechanism on
implementation of the Court’s decisions. If a responsible government
refuses to comply with the Court’s decision, the Council of Europe
Committee of Ministers can re-appeal to the European Court about it.
Another innovation is about the term of office of judges. The European
court’s judge is elected for nine years term. This protocol has not
came to force as Russia, Turkey, Poland and Belgium have not ratified
it yet.
-When the European Court will consider the appeals submitted from
Azerbaijan?
– The number of appeals sent from Azerbaijan increases and decreases
sometimes. In 2002, The Court received 300 appeals and more appeals in
2003. However, this number decreased in 2004-2005. The European Court
has passed a preliminary decision on Azerbaijan. This is related to
Faina Kungrova’s complaint. Her complaint was rejected. Kungrova
claimed that the 3rd, 5th and 6th articles of the Convention as
well as freedom of expression and avoiding discrimination have been
violated. The European Court decided to consider the complaint on
the 5th article. But later on the plaintiff withdrew her complaint
due to some reasons we do not know. So, the Court rejected it. The
Court is expected to pass a decision on Azerbaijan late this year or
early next year.
-Some human rights defendants claim that a plaintiff should appeal
to Constitutional Court before the European Court.
-The European Court said in its decision on Azerbaijan that the
plenum of the Supreme Court is not an absolute instance. It means a
plaintiff can appeal to the European Court after the decision of the
Supreme Court. It concerns the Constitutional Court as well.
If the Supreme Court plenum and Constitutional Court review the appeal,
the European Court may reject it.
-Have the European Court received any complaints from Armenians once
lived in Azerbaijan and by Azerbaijanis once lived in Armenia?
– Azerbaijani refugees from Armenia can appeal to the European Court
in line with the 35th article of the European Convention. They are
to appeal to interior courts of Armenia. If Armenian courts refuse
to meet their claims, the plaintiffs can appeal to the European
Court. These procedures concern Armenians moved from Azerbaijan. As
coming to Azerbaijan’s complaining to the European Court of Armenia,
all the ways to remove Armenia’s aggression are being investigated,
possible options are being analyzed.
There is not a concrete result yet. Azerbaijanis, who have become
internally displaced persons as a result of Armenian aggression,
have submitted over 800 complaints to the European Court against
the Armenian government. The Armenians, who moved from Azerbaijan,
have also attempted to complain to the Court of the Azerbaijani
government. However, these complaints can be considered if the 35th
Article of the Convention is violated.
-What can you say about the complaints on which the Court is in
correspondence with the Azerbaijani government?
-There are complaints submitted by former politicians.
One of the first complaints was made by Alikram Hummatov. The
European Court passed a relevant decision on the possibility of
considering the complaint. Most of the violations claimed by Hummatov
were rejected. Thus, he claims that commuting of death sentence to
life-term imprisonment is a right violation. But this does not violate
the Convention’s articles, there is no human rights violation here. I
hope local courts will follow this decision of the European Court. The
European Court will consider Alikram Hummatov’s complaint on the
violation of the 3rd and 6th articles of the Convention. There is much
likelihood the Court will pass a relevant decision next year. We hope
the Azerbaijani government will win this case. The European Court will
also review Fahmin Hajiyev’s complaint of the Azerbaijani government.
Hajiyev demands millions of euros from the government claiming the
6th article of the Convention is violated.
-Are there any problems to the application of the European Court’
precedence rule by Azerbaijani courts?
Will it help to remove shortfalls in the activity of the courts?
-This rule will first of all raise law culture in the society, will
give impetus to development of juridical system in line with European
standards. For this purpose,the application of the law on “Modernizing
juridical system of Azerbaijan Republic and making amendments and
additions to some legislative acts of the Azerbaijan Republic” under
President Ilham Aliyev’s January 19, 2006 decree recommends following
European Court’ precedence rule by the courts. The local courts have
applied the European Court’ precedence rule recently. If some judges
follow this rule, the articles of the European Convention will be
obeyed, and the number of complaints on human rights violation will
decrease.

Prison Is Not A Blemish For Vahan Hovhannesyan

PRISON IS NOT A BLEMISH FOR VAHAN HOVHANNESYAN
A1+
[08:37 pm] 11 September, 2006
Aram Manoukyan, member of the Armenian National Movement (ANM), aroused
a question recently; why ANM doesn’t turn to Aghvan Hovsepyan, RA
Attorney General, who was engaged in the case hearings. “Everything
is in their hands, let them close the case,” said Manoukyan. We
turned to Vahan Hovhannesyan, the former main suspect in the case
“Vahan Hovhannesyan – 31.”
The latter answered, “Why should we turn to him?”
I think it was the best time in my and Armen Rustamyian’s lives. We
fought against the regime of those times with all possible means and
we don’t want to cross out that period from our lives.
Isn’t the term “change of political situation” (Vahan Hovhannesyan
was released on that ground) vulnerable in case some other political
situation is established?
If our country turned into the country of fascism, of course, we would
become vulnerable. But we would become vulnerable in either case. Thus,
I don’t see any reason for the reconsideration of the case.
But there are members of your party who are still in prison and are
even sentenced to life imprisonment.
There aren’t such people.
I mean Mnjoyan and Artsruny.
They aren’t members of Dashnaktsutyuan.
I see, but weren’t they sentenced for the crimes ascribed to
Dashnaksutyun?
In the case of “Dro” they tried not to mix black with white; there
were people who were not guilty and there were still others who were
trying to be involved in the crime. But their attempts failed and
they are free now.
Do you mean that the crime of those people who are sentenced to life
imprisonment was proved?
I can only say that it was all upon the court to decide who would be
sentenced and who would be set free.

Armenian DM Refutes Azeri Reports That Armenia Has Bought Mass Destr

ARMENIAN DM REFUTES AZERI REPORTS THAT ARMENIA HAS BOUGHT MASS DESTRUCTION WEAPONS FROM CHINA
Yerevan, September 11. ArmInfo. The Armenian Defense Ministry has
refuted the allegations by the Azeri side that Armenia has bought
weapons of mass destruction from China.
The press secretary of the Armenian DM, Colonel Seyran Shakhsuvaryan
says that this is a lie. This is a stupid statement – one should at
least have systems to be able to buy the missiles.
To note, during a press-conference today the head of the press
and information department of the Azeri FM Tair Tagizade said that
the Azeri FM has instructed its ambassadors in Beijing and Moscow
to inquire into the reports. Only then will Baku make an official
statement.

"Armenian Ariner" Don’t Approve Of The US New Ambassador

“ARMENIAN ARINER” DON’T APPROVE OF THE US NEW AMBASSADOR
A1+
[03:53 pm] 12 September, 2006
The youth organization “Spirit Guards” of Armenian Ariner Order is
against Richard Hogland’s assignment on the post of the US Ambassador
to Armenia.
“The representatives of the youth of Armenia, who are faithful to
their traditional beliefs and customs, consider the appointment of the
homosexual ambassador to Armenia inadmissible and nasty from the moral
point of view. Besides, Richard Hogland has preconceived and biased
opinion about Armenians,” says Edgar Helhelyan, chairman of the board.
The representatives of the organization were indignant at the decision
of calling former US ambassador to Armenia John Evans back. They think
the official Washington has showed its negative attitude towards
Armenia and Armenians spread all over the world. This attitude is
determined by the fact that Americans have common interests with
Turkey on economic, military and political issues. Edgar Helhelyan
claims that John Evans was one of the unique officials in the USA who
could openly divulge the truth and name the mass murders of 1886 –
1923 committed by the Turkish government genocide.”
By the way, the youth organization “Spirit Guards” released a statement
in this connection. They are going to send it to the Armenian and
American authorities. If this act of complaint doesn’t work they are
going to organize rallies on the day of Hogland’s arrival in Armenia.

BAKU: OSCE Representatives Did Not Monitor Armenians’ Firing Shell D

OSCE REPRESENTATIVES DID NOT MONITOR ARMENIANS’ FIRING SHELL DURING MONITORING OF CONTACT FRONT LINE
Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Sept 11 2006
The contact line of Azerbaijani and Armenian troops near the
Gapanli village of Azerbaijani region of Terter was monitored in
accordance with the mandate of personal representative of the OSCE
Chairman-in-Office today.
The monitors were Gunter Folk and Peter Ki, field assistants of
the personal representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office from
Azerbaijani side and Imre Palatinus and Jiri Aberle, field assistants
of the personal representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office from
the opposite side, internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan.
The Defense Ministry told the APA the monitoring passed without any
incidence. However, APA’s Garabagh bureau reports Armenians fired
incendiary shell to Gapanli village during the monitoring. The shell
stroke local resident’s house causing fire.
Though the field assistants were notified about this incident, the
OSCE representatives did not monitor it.