BAKU: Returning The Body Of Armenian Soldier Killed In Azerbaijan On

RETURNING THE BODY OF ARMENIAN SOLDIER KILLED IN AZERBAIJAN ON JULY 19 NEGOTIATED

Azeri Press Agency
July 23 2008
Azerbaijan

Armenian Defense Ministry is investigating the fact of killing the
Armenian soldier in the territory of Azerbaijan on July 19, said
Armenian Defense Minister Seyran Ohanian, APA quotes News Armenia
agency.

He said soldier Gor Manasarian left the military base arbitrarily in
unknown direction. Ohanian said they knew about Manasarian’s death from
the information spread by the Azerbaijan Defense Ministry. Minister
said they contacted with operative shift of the Azerbaijani army and
held preparation for returning the Manasarian’s body. A reconnaissance
group of Armenian armed forces attempted to cross Azerbaijan’s borders
in the direction of Agdam Village of Tovuz region of Azerbaijan at
00.30 on July 19. Azerbaijani servicemen prevented this attempt of
Armenian reconnoiters. One of the enemy’s reconnoiters was killed
and others escaped.

Armenia’s Opposition Would Not Abandon Its

EURASIAN SECRET SERVICES DAILY REVIEW

Axis Information & Analysis
July 21 2008

Armenia’s opposition would not abandon its plans for staging rally
despite ban imposed by National Security Service

Armenia’s opposition has again signaled its readiness to defy the ban
on its planned rally and press ahead with the protest action slated
for August 1, online paper ArmeniaNow reports. Last week Yerevan’s
municipality again cited security reasons to make a decision not to
allow the opposition led by first president Ter-Petrosyan to stage
a rally and a subsequent march either in downtown Liberty Square
or near Matenadaran, a nearby ancient manuscripts museum. Instead,
it advised the opposition to gather near either the city’s largest
Hrazdan football arena or the second largest stadium, Dynamo. The
opposition deems both locations situated just off the city center
unsuitable for its rallies.

In imposing the bans the municipality had invoked information from
the National Security Service (NSS) that large gatherings in downtown
Yerevan posed security risks for immediate participants and other
members of the public, ArmeniaNow marks. However, both opposition
rallies went on peacefully, with no incident reported.

Arman Musinyan, the spokesman for opposition leader Levon
Ter-Petrosyan, would not elaborate on the opposition’s further steps to
try to repeal the municipality’s decision legally. He only emphasized
that the opposition would not abandon its plans for staging the
rally. At the same time, Musinyan called the municipality’s proposal
to hold rallies in other venues "unacceptable". Meanwhile, Head of
the Organization and Inspection Division at the Yerevan Municipality
Gagik Baghdasaryan confirmed to ArmeniaNow that the decision not to
authorize the opposition rally in Liberty Square and near Matenadaran
was based on the data provided by the National Security Service and
police. "Under law, notifications about planned rallies, including
opposition rallies, are sent to police and the National Security
Service. And since I had received a reply that during the planned rally
and a subsequent march there would be participants who, according
to operative data, would attempt to instigate clashes with police
workers by means of unlawful provocative actions, I made a decision
to ban the event," Baghdasaryan explained. "The fact that there were
no incidents during two rallies does not give me reasons to disregard
the National Security Service and police information," he added.

Azerbaijan, Armenia Foreign Ministers To Meet In Moscow

AZERBAIJAN, ARMENIA FOREIGN MINISTERS TO MEET IN MOSCOW

ITAR-TASS
July 21 2008
Russia

The foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia, Elmar Mamedyarov and
Edvard Nalbandian, will meet in Moscow on August 1, Azerbaijani Foreign
Ministry spokesman Khazar Ibragim told a news briefing on Monday.

He said the initiative of the meeting, at which settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will be discussed, came from the OSCE Minsk
Group that is a mediator.

He stressed that the talks would be on proposals by co-chairmen of
the Minsk Group that were offered to the sides in the conflict at
the OSCE summit in Madrid last year.

Mamedyarov and Nalbandian last met in St Petersburg on June 6.

We Will Not Accept Any Trade In Issue Of National-State Interests, I

WE WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY TRADE IN ISSUE OF NATIONAL-STATE INTERESTS, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY STATES

NOYAN TAPAN

JU LY 21

On July 21, the Institute of Human Rights and Democracy expressed
much concern with the statements voiced by the RA authorities lately
and their initiatives over the Artsakh problem and Armenian-Turkish
relations.

According to the statement authors, since Armenia’s becoming
independent in 1991 all RA authorities have had the same defeatest
position in national-state foreign political issues. In 1996 such a
position became one of the main reasons of distrust to the authorities,
which in 1998 resulted in the first President’s resignation. It is
mentioned that the RA authorities’ duty is to rule the country by
serving the interests of Armenian people and Armenian statehood and
following the principles of human rights and democracy.

"Our current political and public elites have again opened the "gates"
of our statehood "stronghold" and each tries to certify his being a
"good servant" to "foreign rulers" by conceding the national-state
interests for receiving or retaining the power, being ready for any
step," the statement of the Institute reads mentioning as evidence
UN General Assembly’s Resolution N A/62/L.42, PACE June Resolution
N 1614 regarding Azerbaijan, as well as statements and initiatives
made by Armenian officials of highest level and foreign diplomats.

"Another manifestation of the position defying our nation’s dignity
is official steps of questioning the Armenian Genocide at the highest
level and making friendly gestures to the Turkish authorities. All this
followed the unfair February elections casting doubt on RA authorities’
legitimacy and the March 1 violence and arbitrary actions. We will
not accept any trade over the Artsakh problem, Armenian Genocide,
and any other problem contradicting the vital interests of the whole
Armenian people and statehood. We sound an alarm and warn that in
case of undertaking such a trade the Armenian people with its whole
potential and organized constructions will rise more strongly in
Armenia, Artsakh, and the Diaspora AGAINST the RA authorities and
perverted elites being their satellite," the statement read.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=115806

Editorial: Hostility And Condescension From The Department Of State

EDITORIAL: HOSTILITY AND CONDESCENSION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

AZG Armenian Daily
22/07/2008

Armenia-US

The following editorial appeared in the June 28 edition of the Armenian
Reporter, which is an English-language weekly newspaper distributed
across the United States. The chief editor, Vincent Lima, is based
in Yerevan.

On Wednesday, June 25, David Kramer, the U.S. assistant secretary of
state for democracy, human rights, and labor, held a press conference
at the U.S. Embassy in Yerevan. In his opening statement and in his
responses to reporters’ questions, Mr. Kramer exhibited a degree of
hostility and condescension toward the Armenian state that reflected
poorly on the United States.

Mr. Kramer prefaced his attacks with the observation that "the United
States and Armenia have very good, strong ties. We are friends,
and friends speak candidly with each other."

He then proceeded to deliver a far-from-friendly and far-from-balanced
discourse with advice for the government and no one else.

Freedom of media and assembly

Noting a downward trend in Armenia’s democratic development in
February and March, Mr. Kramer recalled first that the United States
"strongly recommended that the government restore all freedoms of
assembly and the media." He did not acknowledge, however, that the
Armenian government has already done so.

On March 1, then-President Robert Kocharian had invoked his
constitutional powers to declare a state of emergency and had put in
place restrictions on the media and the freedom of assembly. He lifted
the restrictions on the media in part in mid-March and in full upon
the expiration of the state of emergency on March 20. As before, the
whole gamut of voices can be heard in print and electronic media. And
there is a greater diversity of voices on television today than there
was before the elections.

Restrictions on the freedom of assembly were written into law
in mid-March. But the law has since been amended along the lines
recommended by the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe. The
City of Yerevan and the Police made a set of hard-to-understand
decisions initially to ban an antigovernment demonstration scheduled
for June 20, but police relented at the appointed time and 15,000
people gathered peacefully.

Rather than noting this progress, Mr. Kramer moved the goalpost. He
said he wanted to see the television station A1+ back on the air. (This
television station lost its broadcast frequency back in 2002. Public
Television offered at the time to carry A1+’s decidedly antigovernment
news programming daily, but the owner declined. With a finite number
of TV frequencies available, and all of them taken, there can be
no question now of depriving a station of its seven-year license in
favor of A1+. And the United States is not the competent authority to
determine which businesses are best qualified – in terms of capital,
talent, their business plan, and so on – to win the next tender.)

A friendly representative of a friendly nation might have acknowledged
that Armenia had in fact restored freedoms of assembly and media and
welcomed the fact; one way to build on this progress, he might have
added, would be for the government to should ensure that the next
time television frequencies are up for licensing, the process is
transparent and free of political interference.

A credible investigation

Mr. Kramer reiterated the call for the "launch of a serious, credible
investigation of the events of March 1." An investigation has, of
course, been launched. Does Mr. Kramer believe it has the potential
to be the kind of serious and credible investigation we’d all like to
see? Hard to say, since he ignored it and made his own recommendation
instead: model the commission after the 9/11 Commission, he said,
in which notwithstanding a great deal of mutual distrust, the two
parties were represented in equal numbers. (He did not mean the United
States and Al Qaeda but the two major U.S. political parties.)

Well, it so happens that Armenia’s parliamentary parties are entitled
to equal numbers of seats on the commission that was formed last
week. That means the opposition Heritage Party with 7 members of
parliament was offered two seats and the ruling Republican Party with
over 60 members was also offered two seats. Non^_parliamentary groups
have also been offered nonvoting seats.

Prisoners

Mr. Kramer reiterated the call for the "release of those detained
for expressing their political views." Asked by the daily Hayots
Ashkharh whether he had studied the criminal cases pending against
the individuals detained in connection with the events of March 1,
Mr. Kramer said he had not but was inclined to believe the word
of U.S. Embassy staff over any documents assembled by Armenian
investigators. It is proper that State Department policy makers should
trust the professionals who are their subordinates; it is not proper
for them to cast aspersions on the professionals who staff Armenia’s
law enforcement bodies. It’s a question of respect.

As for the substance of the issue, this page too has raised questions
and concerns about the criminal investigation into the events of March
1. While there is clearly a case to be made that Levon Ter-Petrossian
and his team sought to come to power by bringing about a collapse of
the state apparatus (he was calling for and counting on defections),
charges that an armed insurrection was in the works have yet to be
substantiated. In addition, the fact that no one has yet been charged
in connection with the deaths of 10 individuals is cause for concern.

Legitimacy

Asked by RFE/RL about the U.S. attitude toward the new Armenian
administration, Mr. Kramer outdid himself: Robert Kocharian is no
longer the president, he observed, and U.S. officials deal with the
new occupant of the presidential office as the president.

***

We expect the United States to encourage Armenia in a series of
positive ways to help Armenia become the democratic state it aspires
to be. As people who care deeply about Armenia and its people,
we want to see the U.S. government continue to monitor democratic
developments in Armenia with care. Our diplomats – and indeed the
assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights, and labor –
must speak out when they see problems. By the same token, they must
also recognize progress; they must likewise recognize that all elements
of society have an obligation to play a constructive role.

The Bush administration and the State Department should reexamine
their approach to Armenia – lest their continued posturing serve
further to destabilize Armenia and Armenia’s efforts to move forward.

As we move closer to the presidential and congressional elections in
the United States and meet with elected officials and candidates for
office, we need to encourage the United States to take a constructive,
balanced, and informed approach to supporting Armenia’s transition.

Ten Years Of The International Criminal Court: The Slow But Sure Gro

TEN YEARS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: THE SLOW BUT SURE GROWTH OF WORLD LAW

Newropeans Magazine
July 18 2008
France

For nearly a half a century — almost as long as the United Nations
has been in existence — the General Assembly has recognized the need
to establish such a court to prosecute and punish persons responsible
for crimes such as genocide. Many thought that the horrors of the
Second World War — the camps, the cruelty, the exterminations, the
Holocaust — could never happen again. And yet they have. In Cambodia,
in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in Rwanda. Our time — this decade even–
has shown us that man’s capacity for evil knows no limits. Genocide
is now a word of our time too, a heinous reality that calls for a
historic response – Koffi Annan, then UN Secretary-General

July 17 marks the 10th anniversary of the Diplomatic Conference in Rome
that established the International Criminal Court — a major step in
the creation of world law. Citizens of the world have usually made a
distinction between international law as commonly understood and world
law. International law has come to mean laws that regulate relations
between States, with the International Court of Justice — the World
Court in The Hague — as the supreme body of the international law
system. The Internatiional Court of Justice is the successor to the
Permanent Court of International Justice that was established at the
time of the League of Nations following the First World War. When the
United Nations was formed in 1945, the World Court was re-established
as the principal judicial organ of the UN. It is composed of 15 judges
who are elected by the UN General Assembly and the Security Council.

Only States may be parties in cases before the World Court. An
individual cannot bring a case before the Court, nor can a company
although many transnational companies are active at the world
level. International agencies that are part of the UN system may
request advisory opinions from the Court on legal questions arising
from their activities but advisory opinions are advisory rather
than binding.

Citizens of the world have tended to use the term "world law"
in the sense that Wilfred Jenks, for many years the legal spirit
of the International Labour Organization, used the term the common
law of mankind: "By the common law of mankind is meant the law of
an organized world community, contributed on the basis of States but
discharging its community functions increasingly through a complex of
international and regional institutions, guaranteeing rights to, and
placing obligations upon, the individual citizen, and confronted with
a wide range of economic, social and technological problems calling
for uniform regulation on an international basis which represents a
growing proportion of the subject-matter of the law." It is especially
the ‘rights and obligations’ of the individual person which is the
common theme of world citizens.

The growth of world law has been closely related to the development
of humanitarian law and to the violations of humanitarian law. It was
Gustave Moynier, one of the founders of the International Committee
of the Red Cross (ICRC) and a longtime president of the ICRC who
presented in 1872 the first draft convention for the establishment
of an international criminal court to punish violations of the first
Red Cross standards on the humane treatment of the sick and injured in
periods of war, the 1864 Geneva Convention. The Red Cross conventions
are basically self-enforcing. "If you treat my prisoners of war well,
I will treat yours the same way." Governments were not willing to act
on Moynier’s proposition, but Red Cross standards were often written
into national laws.

The Red Cross Geneva conventions deal with the way individuals should
be treated in time of war. They have been expanded to cover civil wars
and prisoners of civil unrest. The second tradition of humanitarian
law arises from the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and deals
with the weapons of war and the way war is carried on. Most of the
Hague rules, such as the prohibition against bombarding undefended
towns or villages, have fallen by the side, but the Hague spirit of
banning certain weapons continues in the ban on chemical weapons,
land mines and soon, cluster weapons. However, although The Hague
meetings made a codification of war crimes, no monitoring mechanisms
or court for violations was set up.

After the First World War, Great Britain, France and Belgium accused
the Central Powers, in particular Germany and Turkey of war atrocities
such as the deportation of Belgian civilians to Germany for forced
labor, executing civilians, the sinking of the Lusitania and the
killing of Armenians by the Ottoman forces. The Treaty of Versailles,
signed in June 1919 provided in articles 227-229 the legal right
for the Allies to establish an international criminal court. The
jurisdiction of the court would extend from common soldiers to
military and government leaders. Article 227 deals specifically with
Kaiser Wilhelm II, underlining the principle that all individuals
to the highest level can be held accountable for their wartime
actions. However, the USA opposed the creation of an international
criminal court both on the basis of State sovereignty and on the basis
that the German government had changed and that one must look to the
future rather than the past.

The same issues arose after the Second World War with the creation of
two military courts — the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg
and the International Military Tribunal for the Far East. Some have
said that these tribunals were imposing ‘victors’ justice on their
defeated enemies, Germany and Japan. There was no international
trial for Italians as Italy had changed sides at an opportune time,
and there were no prosecutions of Allied soldiers or commanders.

In the first years of the United Nations, there was a discussion of
the creation of an international court. A Special Committee was set
up to look into the issue. The Special Committee mad a report in 1950
just as the Korean War had broken out, marking a Cold War that would
continue until 1990, basically preventing any modifications in the
structure of the UN.

Thus, during the Cold War, while there were any number of candidates
for a war crime tribunal, none was created. For the most part national
courts rarely acted even after changes in government. From Stalin
to Uganda’s Idi Amin to Cambodia’s Pol Pot, war criminals have lived
out their lives in relative calm.

It was only at the end of the Cold War that advances were made. Ad
hoc international criminal courts have been set up to try war crimes
from former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone. Just as the Cold
War was coming to an end, certain countries became concerned with
international drug trafficking. Thus in 1989, Trinidad and Tobago
proposed the establishment of an international court to deal with the
drug trade. The proposal was passed on by the UN General Assembly to
the International Law Commission, the UN’s expert body on international
law. By 1993, the International Law Commission made a comprehensive
report calling for a court able to deal with a wider range of issues
than just drugs — basically what was called the three ‘core crimes’
of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

By the mid-1990s, a good number of governments started to worry about
world trends and the breakdown of the international legal order. The
break up of the federations of the USSR and Yugoslavia, the genocide
in Rwanda, the breakdown of all government functions in Somalia,
the continuing north-south civil war in Sudan — all pointed to the
need for legal restraints on individuals. This was particularly true
with the rise of non-State insurgencies. International law as law
for relations among States was no longer adequate to deal with the
large number on non-State actors.

By the mid-1990s, the door was open to the new concept of world law
dealing with individuals, and the drafting of the statues of the
International Criminal Court went quickly. There is still much to be
done to develop the intellectual basis of world law and to create the
institutions to structure it, but the International Criminal Court
is an important milestone.

Labour’s Favourite Doctor Prescribes Strong Medicine, But Patients A

ABOUR’S FAVOURITE DOCTOR PRESCRIBES STRONG MEDICINE, BUT PATIENTS AND HIS COLLEAGUES MAY NOT SWALLOW IT

AZG Armenian Daily
17/07/2008

Social

The surgeon Ara Darzi likes to listen to Pink Floyd while he wields
his scalpel. After a year-long operation, the music stops tomorrow
when he publishes a review of the NHS that aims to revive the ailing
patient on its 60th anniversary.

One of Gordon Brown’s first acts as prime minister was to call on
Darzi to undertake the task. He was duly ennobled as Lord Darzi
of Denham and made a health minister. Brown’s request "gobsmacked"
the 48-year-old clinician, but stranger things had happened to Darzi.

Born in Iraq to Armenian parents and raised in the Russian Orthodox
faith, he went to a Jewish school before studying medicine in Ireland
and becoming an internationally renowned pioneer of keyhole surgery
in London. His robot-assisted techniques have earned him the nickname
"Robo Doc".

His years in Dublin have left him with an Irish lilt that marks his
affable manner. Courteous, brainy and driven, Darzi has done nothing
to embarrass his patron, unlike Brown’s other coopted "outsiders"
such as Alan West, the security minister, Mark Malloch Brown, the
foreign minister, and Digby Jones, the trade minister.

He achieved heroic status last November by helping to save the life of
Lord Brennan, a Labour peer, who had a heart seizure after attacking
the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill in the Lords.

"I could see from the corner of my eye Lord Brennan was not very well,"
Darzi recalled on Desert Island Discs last week. "He collapsed. You
just forget where you are. So I started jumping on top of benches
and ended up doing a mouth-to-mouth and heart massage to see if I
couldn’t get him back." After several minutes of futile attempts,
Darzi called for an electric defibrillator ("I used the F-word")
and revived Brennan. "As I was shocking him I saw the Archbishop of
York doing his prayers."

Darzi continues to perform operations on Fridays and Saturday mornings
in London: he is honorary consultant surgeon at St Mary’s hospital,
professor of surgery at Imperial College and chair of surgery at
the Royal Marsden. The rest of the weekend is set aside for his wife
Wendy and children Freddie and Nina.

Having left political meetings abruptly when summoned for emergency
operations, he is clear where his priorities lie. He does a humorous
impression of aghast expressions in Downing Street when he raced off
to treat a colleague. "From day one I told them: if one of my patients
[needs attention], that comes first."

Darzi seemed in need of pastoral intercession himself last October
when the interim report of his NHS review proposed 150 polyclinics
or "super-surgeries", open all hours and partly run by private
enterprise, which would bring together family doctors and specialist
consultants. Amid talk of a mass walkout from the health service and
calls for Darzi’s resignation, fears were raised that the innovation
could spell the end of small practices run by family doctors, replacing
them with a wasteful, bureaucratic system.

The clamour has increased in recent weeks, with the British
Medical Association’s "save our surgeries" campaign raising 1.2m
signatures. Scaremongering, protested Darzi, who accused doctors of
"breaking their professional vows" by urging patients to oppose the
plan. In last week’s Sunday Times he singled out some doctors as
"laggards", so intent on protecting their "professional boundaries"
that they obstructed new treatments.

Since Darzi mooted the idea of polyclinics, all 31 London health
trusts have submitted plans for the super-surgeries.

Tomorrow’s review is expected to guarantee minimum standards of care,
setting out the rights and responsibilities of patients – although
plans to force people to lose weight or give up smoking in exchange
for healthcare have been rejected. Darzi also proposes to give a
bigger role to nurses.

Under his slogan "localise where possible, centralise where necessary",
Darzi believes doctors and nurses must treat patients as customers,
inviting them to grade the quality of their care so others can shop
around: "When you go to a restaurant you look at a website and find
out exactly what people said about that restaurant."

He visualises the NHS structured like a pyramid with, at the bottom,
patients receiving more care in the home – and being allowed to die
there, if they wish – while the top tier would consist of centres of
excellence along the lines of the Royal Marsden. Complex surgery and
critical care for serious illnesses would be provided by big hospitals
serving a million or more people.

Critics say aspects of the plan smack of John Major’s "patient’s
charter", introduced to little effect in 1991. They also cast doubt
on Darzi’s avowed reluctance to take on a political role ("I had
sleepless nights thinking about this"), claiming he was used as a pawn
by the government in the 2004 Hartlepool by-election to reinforce its
reassurances that the town’s University hospital would not be closed.

His detractors point to a telling remark by Alan Johnson, the
health secretary, on Brown’s appointment of nonpoliticians to his
"government of all the talents", known by the acronym "goats". Johnson
told The Guardian in January: "We don’t have a goat problem in this
department. Our goat is tethered."

Darzi was born on May 7, 1960, into a family that had fled to Iraq
from the genocide of Armenians by Ottoman Turks in 1915. His father’s
work as an engineer, developing power stations, often took the family
abroad, but Baghdad was then a stable cosmopolitan city in which
Saddam Hussein had yet to appear.

Darzi’s Jewish school was highly disciplined: "Very academic, not
even a playground. There was no such thing as sport, really." At
home he studied Armenian and served as an altar boy in church. He
was expected to emulate his father’s career, but while in hospital
with a life-threatening case of meningitis, his doctor planted the
idea of medicine.

His parents had friends in Ireland, which they considered safe for
his studies, so at 17 he was packed off to Dublin: "Rain, cold,
miserable." Soon he began to fall in love with the place, visiting
little towns in a sailing boat and frequenting Durty Nelly’s bar in
Limerick, which he had been told had the most beautiful girls. Friends
called him "Dara Darcy, the dark Paddy".

To his mind there was a curious parallel between the conflicts in
Ireland and Iraq: "Most of the troubles back in Iraq were between the
factions of the Shi’ites and the Sunnis. In Ireland, is was between
two factions of Christians. That had no logic to me. I found that
quite challenging."

As a student at the Royal College of Surgeons, Darzi took to hanging
around hospitals to see if he could make himself useful and experience
the reality of being a doctor. After conducting his first appendix
operation, a year before qualifying, he said: "It was the most exciting
day of my life."

He met Wendy, the Protestant daughter of a dentist, at a college
function. Their subsequent marriage in 1991 posed interdenominational
problems: "We had to find a church in Ireland to get married, and
also to have an Armenian patriarch to come and give us a blessing."

Darzi first encountered keyhole surgery in Dublin. "Surgery in those
days was a big cut – the bigger the cut, the more macho the surgeon
was." Enthused by accounts of less invasive techniques, he did his
first keyhole operation and was struck by the patient’s quick recovery
time. "The same day we had done an open operation on the patient next
door. It was like chalk and cheese."

Moving to England to gain experience, he encountered resistance
to keyhole surgery from his superior, who pronounced the procedure
dangerous, until Darzi won him round by conducting an operation with
him. "Very quickly we realised this was the tip of the iceberg." The
medical director of St Mary’s hospital was so thrilled by the publicity
that he offered Darzi a consultancy at the youthful age of 31. The
student decided to wait until he had qualified a year later.

Showered with awards, in 2002 he was knighted for services to medicine
and surgery; in 2003 he became a British citizen.

Darzi says his review of England’s healthcare is like no other,
incorporating the views of 2,000 medical experts. His watchwords are
courage, innovation and best practice. "I am a great believer in
bottom-up. When I want to change something in a ward environment,
I go and talk to the student nurses on the ward, because they know
exactly what is happening on the ward."

Yerevan Ararat To Receive Swiss Belinzona On July 17 In Abovian

YEREVAN ARARAT TO RECEIVE SWISS BELINZONA ON JULY 17 IN ABOVIAN

NOYAN TAPAN

JU LY 16

Yerevan Ararat will receive Swiss Belinzona in the first game of
UEFA Cup Tournament first qualification round on July 17 in Abovian
sports ground. French judges group headed by Philippe Kalt will serve
the match.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=115692

Armenia And U.S. To Jointly Combat Nuclear Smuggling

ARMENIA AND U.S. TO JOINTLY COMBAT NUCLEAR SMUGGLING

PanARMENIAN.Net
15.07.2008 14:26 GMT+04:00

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Armenian Foreign Minister
Edward Nalbandian signed on July 14, 2008, the "Joint Action Plan
between the Government of the United States of America and the
Government of the Republic of Armenia on Combating Smuggling of
Nuclear and Radioactive Materials."

This political agreement expresses the intention of the two governments
to cooperate to increase the capabilities of the Republic of Armenia
to prevent, detect, and respond effectively to attempts to smuggle
nuclear or radioactive materials. With this agreement, the U.S. and
Armenian governments are significantly enhancing their collaborative
efforts to combat the threat that nuclear or highly radioactive
materials could be acquired by terrorists.

This is the fifth agreement of this nature that has been concluded by
the U.S. government’s Nuclear Smuggling Outreach Initiative. Previous
agreements were completed with Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Georgia, and the
Kyrgyz Republic. To date, eight countries and three international
organizations have partnered with the U.S. government to provide
assistance to support implementation of these agreements, reported
the press office of the U.S. Embassy in Yerevan

BEIRUT: Cabinet Portfolios From Political Factions’ Perspective

CABINET PORTFOLIOS FROM POLITICAL FACTIONS’ PERSPECTIVE

Naharnet
July 11 2008
Lebanon

The 30-member government of national unity and the first under
President Michel Suleiman brought in new ministers and a change of
portfolios for some old ones.

Suleiman nominated State minister Yusuf Taqla (Greek Catholic, new),
Defence Minister: Elias Murr (Greek Orthodox, unchanged) and Interior
Minister: Ziad Baroud (Maronite, new).

The new cabinet saw the representation of MP Michel Aoun’s FPM for
the first time through Social Affairs Minister Mario Aoun (Maronite,
new), Deputy Prime Minister: Issam Abu Jamra (Greek Orthodox, new),
Telecommunications Minister: Gibran Bassil (Maronite, new).

Al-Mustaqbal Parliamentary Block was represented through Premier
Fouad Saniora, the first woman to hold the education ministry and
sister of assassinated Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, MP Bahia Hariri
(Sunni, new), Finance Minister: Mohammed Shatah (Sunni, new) who
was Saniora’s advisor, and State Minister: Khaled Qabbani (Sunni)
who held education ministry.

MP Walid Jumblat’s Progressive Socialist Party is represented by
State Minister Wael Bou Faour (Druze, new), Public Works and Transport
Minister: Ghazi Aridi who held the information post.

Lebanese Forces was represented by Justice Minister: Ibrahim Najjar
(Greek Orthodox, new), and Environment Minister: Antoine Karam
(Maronite, new).

Phalange Party was represented by Tourism Minister: Elie Marouni
(Maronite, new), whose brother Nasri Marouni was shot dead in Zahle
months ago during a Phalange party event.

Qornet Shehwan Gathering was represented by ex-MP, presidential
candidate State Minister Nassib Lahoud (Maronite, new). He replaced
social affairs minister MP Nayla Muawad.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri’s Amal movement was represented by
Industry Minister: Ghazi Zaayter (Shiite, new), Foreign Minister:
Fawzi Salukh (Shiite) who returned to the post he resigned in 2006, and
Health Minister: Mohammad Khalifeh (Shiite) who also retains his post.

Hizbullah was represented by Labor Minister: Mohammed Fneish (Shiite)
who held the energy portfolio in Saniora’s resignated government.

Tripoli Gathering was represented by its leader Mohammed al-Safadi
who holds now Economy and Trade Minister: Mohammed Safadi (Sunni)
instead of Public Works and Transport portfolio.

Armenian Tashnaq party was represented by Energy and Water Minister:
Alan Taburian (new).

Armenian Hanshaq party was represented by State Minister: Jean
Ogassapian who held the Administrative Development portfolio.

Democratic Party was represented by its leader Sports and Youth
Minister: Talal Erslan (Druze, new).

Populer Block was represented by its leader Agriculture Minister:
Elie Skaff (Greek Catholic, new).

The Syrian Social National Party was represented through its former
leader State Minister Ali Qanso (Shiite, new).

Independents are: Information Minister: Tareq Mitri (Greek Orthodox)
who was education minister in the resignated government, Culture
Minister: Tammam Slam (Sunni, new), Displaced Persons Minister: Raymond
Audi (Greek Orthodox, new) who was nominated by March 14 forces.

Administrative Development Minister: Ibrahim Shamseddin (Shiite, new)
is also an independent minister nominated by March 14 Forces and who
Speaker Berri, reportedly, fiercely opposed his nomination.