BAKU: PACE Subcommittee On Nagorno Karabakh Holds Session In Strasbo

PACE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NAGORNO KARABAKH HOLDS SESSION IN STRASBOURG

Today.Az
tics/44369.html
April 18 2008
Azerbaijan

The PACE Subcommittee on Nagorno Karabakh has held its session under
Lord Russell Johnston’s chairmanship within the spring session of
the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE).

Samad Seyidov, Chief Delegate of Azerbaijan to PACE told APA that the
Subcommittee conducted discussions over the meeting between Azerbaijani
and Armenian delegations in the Subcommittee scheduled for June.

"It was planned to hold this meeting in June, but we decided not
to hold it, because everyone knows the situation in Armenia. We,
the Azerbaijani side, showed our constructiveness. I don’t believe
in this meeting to take place even in October. The presidential
elections will take place in Azerbaijan in October and we will have
to work hard. Perhaps, this meeting can be realized within the January
session and it is clear that it will not take place this year".

Samad Seyidov said regarding the current situation in Armenia that
the PACE Subcommittee on Nagorno Karabakh had not included the visit
to the region on the agenda.

http://www.today.az/news/poli

BAKU: Azerbaijani Consul General To Los Angeles Sends Letter Of Prot

AZERBAIJANI CONSUL GENERAL TO LOS-ANGELES SENDS LETTER OF PROTEST TO WILSHIRE EBELL THEATRE’S GENERAL MANAGER

AzerTag
April 18 2008
Azerbaijan

Elin Suleymanov, Azerbaijani Consul General to Los-Angeles sent a
letter of protest to Philip Miller, General Manager of the Wilshire
Ebell Theatre regarding Armenian Cultural Foundation’s plans to hold an
event called "Artsakh 20th Anniversary Commemoration" at the Theatre.

The letter says "Artsakh 20th Anniversary Commemoration" is a reference
to the beginning of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict in 1988, the most
violent confrontation in the former Soviet Union to date. The reality
is that, on May 2, the Wilshire Ebell Theatre will be hosting the
celebration of a conflict, which costs tens of thousands of lives
in both Armenia and Azerbaijan and led to displacement of over one
million civilians.

Numerous governments, international governmental agencies, as well as
U.S. government policy officially recognize the illegal occupation of
this Azerbaijani territory; acknowledge the ethnic cleansing conducted
by Armenia and the presence of hundreds of thousands of refugees.

As I sit to write this letter, the U.S. government is working
vigorously toward resolving the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict. Please,
understand that, not a single nation, including the United States,
and in fact, Armenia, recognize the separatist regime of so-called
"Artsakh".

I understand that Wilshire Ebell Theatre is a private institution
and that the Armenian Cultural Foundation is entitled to have
private events. However, as the subject involves Azerbaijan’
internationally-recognized territory, as well as the ongoing suffering
of people and wounds yet to be healed on both sides, I urge you
to consider the ethical and moral ramification and affects of this
event. I cannot imagine Azerbaijan ever welcoming a celebration of an
event as painful to Americans as the beginning of this unresolved
conflict is for the Azerbaijanis. Moreover, celebrating ethnic
cleansing and violence against civilians is hardly compatible with
the Wilshire Ebell’s history and reputation.

I look forward to hearing from you and discussing our concerns in
greater detail.

Ensuring Transparency To Be One Of Main Focuses In Armenian Governme

ENSURING TRANSPARENCY TO BE ONE OF MAIN FOCUSES IN ARMENIAN GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES

ARKA
April 17, 2008

YEREVAN, April 17. /ARKA/. Ensuring transparency of government
work will be one of the main focuses in government activities, the
Prime-Minister of Armenia Tigran Sargsian said at the government
sitting Thursday.

Involvement of the public will be the main principle in organizing
government works to ensure, first, quality of government decisions and,
second, legitimacy of government activity so that public discussions
are held on the decisions to be made, Sargsian said.

He also said that from now on citizens will have an opportunity to get
familiar with the draft decisions on ministries’ sites. He stressed
the necessity of feedback on the decisions adopted by the government.

Sargsian reported that government sittings will be broadcast and 250
mass media outlets accredited in the government will have a chance
to follow the course of the sitting online.

The head of the government called the cabinet staff to master modern
work methods and stressed the importance of knowledge and learning. "We
should learn together – not learning is much worse than not knowing.

Reforms are impossible without learning and gaining new knowledge,"
the Prime-Minister said.

The Prime-Minister stressed that two important documents to provide
guidelines for the cabinet are the government activity program by
2012 and the election campaign program of Serge Sargsian. -0–

Edward Nalbandian Appointed Foreign Minister Of Armenia

EDWARD NALBANDIAN APPOINTED FOREIGN MINISTER OF ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
14.04.2008 22:13 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia’s President Serzh Sargsyan signed Monday
a decree on appointment Edward Nalbandian Foreign Minister of the
Republic of Armenia, the RA leader’s press office reported.

Earlier, Edward Nalbandian was dismissed from the post of Armenia’s
Ambassador to France and Vatican.

TOL: From Russia, With Luck

FROM RUSSIA, WITH LUCK
by Marina Kozlova

Transitions Online
April 14 2008
Czech Republic

Branches of Russian universities give select Uzbek students what they
can’t always get locally: prestige and jobs.

TASHKENT | Anya entered the Tashkent branch of an expensive
Russian economics university rather than one of Uzbekistan’s public
universities, gambling that her choice would lead to a good job. With
just weeks to go before receiving her diploma, she’s already lined
up work at a company in Moscow.

The young woman says it has been hard work and, with fees now reaching
$2,000 per year at the local branch of the Plekhanov Russian Academy
of Economics, a substantial investment in a country plagued by deep
economic problems and soaring prices. "It would be a waste of time"
to attend the school without taking the work seriously, she said. A
fellow student – who, like Anya, did not want to be identified because
expression is tightly controlled in Uzbekistan – also said the diploma
from the school is a big plus because it is respected internationally.

They are among a small but growing number of Uzbek students who choose
to forgo free or low-cost degrees offered by state institutions for the
chance to get a prestigious degree and better prospects for employment.

And more opportunities are available these days. The Tashkent branch
of the Plekhanov Academy of Economics opened in 1995, but recent
agreements between the Russian and Uzbek governments have allowed other
institutions to establish campuses here. Cooperation between the two
countries led to the opening of branches of Moscow State University in
2006 and Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas a year later.

Moscow State University’s imposing Tashkent campus. Photo: Moscow
State University in Tashkent.

"The branches were set up as a result of two intergovernmental pacts
and one interdepartmental agreement," said Tatyana Mishukovskaya,
a representative of Roszarubezhcenter, the Russian Center for
International Scientific and Cultural Cooperation under Russia’s
Foreign Ministry in Tashkent.

Moscow State University’s campus now has 80 students in two faculties:
applied mathematics and informatics, and psychology. At Gubkin,
105 students are studying geophysics and techniques for finding and
extracting oil and gas.

"The teachers at Tashkent Technical University envy us – they don’t
have modern equipment, apparatus and books," says Bakhtier Nurtaev,
chief executive of the school’s Tashkent campus.

HELP FROM EAST AND WEST

The Uzbek government under Islam Karimov has taken steps to open up
higher education to competition, often depending on where its political
alliances rest at the time. In 2002, amid warming relations with the
United States and Europe, Westminster International University was
established. Its partners include the University of Westminster in
London, and the Tashkent school offers English-language degrees and
certificates in business, technology and law.

Training in information and communication technology at 32 vocational
colleges has been strengthened through a German-Uzbek cooperation
project that began in 2003. The German government’s aid agency has
pumped 2.28 million euros into the project, and Germany’s KfW Bank
Group has provided nearly 10 million euros in loans and grants.

Despite the influx of help and new institutions, dozens of universities
and other schools remain cash-strapped. The International Monetary Fund
warns that Uzbekistan’s neglected educational system is a detriment
to the country’s economic future.

The IMF’s 2008 Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper cites the "inadequate
quality of the educational process at all stages of education including
the quality of curricula and textbooks, teacher skills as well as the
practical orientation of the educational process to the needs of the
labor market."

The situation in local universities is aggravated by the meager wages
and poor training of teachers. Graft in higher education also hampers
quality. In response to such challenges, the Karimov government in
2004 announced a plan to increase investment in education, improve
teacher qualifications and salaries, and combat corruption.

Where the government turns for help depends on its foreign policy.

When Uzbekistan gambled on improving relations with the United States
and other Western governments by offering military bases to support
the invasion of Afghanistan, the aid followed. But Karimov fell out of
favor with his Western partners after his regime’s brutal suppression
of an uprising in the eastern town of Andijan in May 2005. Karimov
characterized the protests by human rights and anti-poverty advocates
as a revolt stoked by Islamic extremists and blamed them for the
bloodshed. As Western investment and aid dissipated, Russia stepped
in. The Russian ITAR-TASS news agency reported last year that the
total value of investment projects carried out by Russian companies
in the fuel and energy sector of Uzbekistan exceeded $3 billion.

The relationship extends beyond the purely commercial: in 2006,
Uzbekistan joined the Eurasian Economic Community, whose other
members are Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan,
and rejoined the Collective Security Treaty Organization, a grouping
of the same member states plus Armenia, from which it had withdrawn
in 1999. Uzbekistan is also a member of the Shanghai Cooperation
Organization for regional security issues, which includes China,
Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. Tashkent also signed
a military cooperation accord with Moscow three years ago.

The two new branches of the Russian universities opened following a
2005 humanitarian agreement between the Russian and Uzbek governments.

Visiting instructors and higher salaries paid to Uzbek teachers,
combined with better resources, give the institutions an edge
over public universities, where good grades and graft often
go hand-in-hand. "Those sorts of affairs are impossible in our
university," said Gubkin’s Nurtaev. "We have told students that they
can have high marks only thanks to acquired knowledge, and all other
ways are impossible."

PRESTIGE – FOR A PRICE

Students say degrees from these universities are more prestigious,
but that it is harder to get in – and stay in – than at Uzbek national
universities. "We attend classes. The teachers don’t take bribes. It
would be difficult to arrange marks with those who come here from
Moscow," says a first-year student at the Moscow State University
branch.

Students at the Plekhanov Russian Academy of Economics and other
prestigious foreign university branches in Tashkent say they can’t
get away with skipping class and paying teachers for good grades.

Photo: Plekhanov Russian Academy of Economics in Tashkent.

But they also pay dearly for an education in a country where the
average monthly wage was about $160 in late 2006 and where the IMF
expects inflation to hit 10 percent this year. Anya, the graduating
economics student, had a sponsor who helped pay her tuition at the
Plekhanov Academy of Economics. Tuition at the local branch of Moscow
State University costs $2,400 per year. "Many can’t afford study
at the branches of Russian universities, it’s too expensive," says
Marina Pikulina, an independent political analyst. "I know that some
refused to study there after they were told how much they had to pay."

The students who do attend say the cost is worth it. The curricula at
the Russian schools are accredited by education authorities in both
Russia and Uzbekistan. As a result, diplomas attained at the Uzbek
branches are recognized in Russia.

While these universities offer resources and standards not available
at local schools, the Uzbek Ministry of Higher Education welcomes
the competition.

"The branches create a competitive environment in higher education,
so we welcome them," says Rustam Kuchkarov, head of the ministry’s
department of information and communication technologies. "Moreover,
we can study their experience and compare it with our own."

The new universities, with combined enrollments of only a few hundred
students, hardly pose a threat to the Uzbek national system of higher
education. Uzbekistan has 20 universities and more than 40 other
higher educational institutions enrolling more than 280,000 students.

Foreign university branches can’t yet rival the public institutions
because they offer so few slots, says Farkhad Tolipov, an associate
professor at the National University of Uzbekistan. "The market for
educational services in Uzbekistan is not full up."

New Site Www.Maragha.Nk.Am

NEW SITE
Narine Aghabalyan

KarabakhOpen
11-04-2008 10:54:19

The Karabakh-based Tsir Katin company with the assistance of the NKR
government set up a web site at which provides
information about the slaughter of the Armenian population of the
village of Maragha, Karabakh, on April 10, 1992.

The site provides documents, written and oral testimonies, photos
and video.

Currently the site is only in English, soon the Armenian and Russian
pages will be set up.

WWW.MARAGHA.NK.AM
www.maragha.nk.am

RA NA Starts Discussing Draft Statement On Nagorno Karabakh Settleme

RA NA STARTS DISCUSSING DRAFT STATEMENT ON NAGORNO KARABAKH SETTLEMENT

Noyan Tapan
April 10, 2008

YEREVAN, APRIL 10, NOYAN TAPAN. On April 10, the RA National Assembly
started discussing the draft statement of NA on the settlement of
the Nagorno Karabakh problem. At that, in particular, RA NA proposes
the President and government activizing and expanding the efforts
and possibilities of working out and implementing measures aimed at
providing complete information to the international community on
the Nagorno Karabakh problem, formulating within the framework of
the international law the legal bases, which in case of a military
aggression or use of other forcible measures by Azerbaijan will give
RA a possibility to guarantee complete security and defence of NKR.

As the author of the draft, NA Speaker Tigran Torosian, said, the
processes of problem’s settlement do not give an occasion for optimism,
Azerbaijan’s bellicose statements and anti-Armenian propaganda become
deeper and deeper, which does not receive an adequate response at
international instances.

According to him, the growth of Azerbaijan’s profits, first of all
thanks to oil financial flows, creates a false illusion that it
is possible to solve the problem through military operations, and
therefore, misleads its own people.

T. Torosian said that efforts should be strained for the
internationally recognized NKR to be involved in the negotiations
process as a conflict side. According to him, though Armenia can
recognize NKR at any moment, it will be much more efficient if it
concentrates its efforts on NKR’s international recognition.

T. Torosian said that Nagorno Karabakh’s National Assembly is aware
about his initiative, and that issue will be discussed in detail
during the sitting of the two countries’ Interparliamentary Cooperation
Commission to be held next week in Stepanakert.

Turkish Law Change Not Ruled Out

TURKISH LAW CHANGE NOT RULED OUT

Alalam News Network
April 10 2008
Iran

ANKARA, April 10–Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan said on
Thursday he would not rule out amending the constitution if a top court
moves to close his ruling AK Party on charges of Islamic activities.

European Union applicant Turkey has been dealing with a political raw
since a chief prosecutor asked the Constitutional Court last month
to shut down the party.

Erdogan told a joint news conference with European Commission President
Jose Manuel Barroso: "If it is necessary such a step will be taken
but if it is not necessary the legal process will be followed just
as it is."

Giving a cautious response, Barroso said, "What I can tell you frankly
is that I hope the decision of the Constitutional Court will be a
decision compatible with the rule of law, European standards, with
jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights."

AKP supporters see the court case as a fresh attack by hardline
secularists, whose prominent members include some judges, the military
and some academics, after the party’s re-election for a second term
in July with almost 47 percent of the vote.

Barroso urged Turkey speed up democracy reforms, saying that "there
is a long way to go" before it catches up with EU membership criteria.

He urged Ankara to focus on improving freedom of speech, the rights
of women, trade unions and religious and ethnic minorities.

Barroso said he was confident that two new policy areas would be
opened for negotiations with Turkey by July, bringing the total to
eight out of 35 chapters that candidates are required to complete.

Erdogan reassured that Ankara was "putting all its efforts and
determination" behind the country’s accession bid.

"Our common objective is membership and we cannot accept any other
alternative," he said, referring to opposition by EU countries such
as France and Germany, who advocate special partnership rather than
full accession for the mainly Muslim nation.

Keen to mend its pro-EU credibility, the government submitted to
parliament this week a proposal to amend a law the EU has denounced
as a threat to freedom of speech in Turkey.

Barroso welcomed the draft as "a step in the right direction."

The proposal aims to soften Article 301 of the penal code, which
calls for up to three years in jail for "insulting Turkishness"
and has been used mainly against critics of Turkey’s official line
on Armenian massacres under the Ottoman Empire.

BAKU: Novruz Mammadov: "Referendum On Nagorno Karabakh’s Status Shou

NOVRUZ MAMMADOV: "REFERENDUM ON NAGORNO KARABAKH’S STATUS SHOULD ONLY BE HELD IN THE ENTIRE TERRITORY OF AZERBAIJAN"

Azeri Press Agency
April 10 2008
Azerbaijan

Issue on holding referendum on Nagorno Karabakh’s status has not been
put before Azerbaijan.

Baku. Lachin Sultanova – APA. Head of Azerbaijani President’s Office
International Relations Department Novruz Mammadov’s interview to APA

-Can the meeting of Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents take place
by the presidential elections in Azerbaijan?

-Azerbaijan and its President Ilham Aliyev approaches
Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno Karabakh conflict conceptually. The
international community has established the Minsk Group within
the framework of OSCE to solve this conflict. The group has been
operating for more than ten years, no concrete results have been
achieved yet. Of course, it worries Azerbaijani President and
he has made his remarks concerning it. After UN General Assembly
adopted resolution on "The situation in the occupied Azerbaijani
territories" Armenia made statements that Azerbaijani Government did
not want to meet, refused Minsk Group and OSCE and tried to solve
the problem within the framework of UN. All this, is disinformation,
undiplomatic steps taken to influence Azerbaijan’s position to some
extent and do not reflect reality. The ongoing processes in Armenia,
political crisis after the elections are very deep and strong. The
crisis continues and I think will continue for a long time. The report
of the International Crisis Group shows that the ongoing processes
in the country are inadequate, the world community should express
concrete position on the developments in Armenia and pressure should
be exerted on official Yerevan to achieve constructive settlement of
Nagorno Karabakh conflict. During his visit to Romania, Azerbaijani
President met with the co-chairs on their insistence, exchanged views
on their position on the resolution and wanted explanation. Of course,
it was impossible to hold meeting with Armenian authorities in this
situation. Serzh Sarkisian did not have the status of president at
that time, this meeting could be some kind of support for him in
the political crisis he faced. That’s’ why Azerbaijani President
did not do it. But the general opinion is that Azerbaijan does not
refuse Minsk Group, negotiations within the framework of OSCE and
is ready to meet. Azerbaijani President will not certainly refuse
a meeting, if there is a concrete issue, if there is a need to hold
concrete discussions on some points and it is possible to make a step
forward. At the recent meeting the co-chairs persistently said they
would do their best for some kind of self-rehabilitation. The debate
was too tense, Azerbaijani President’s position was very severe. The
President’s position was that such events might influence the relations
of Azerbaijan with the co-chairs and the countries they represent and
that they should take it into account. Azerbaijan is an independent
state, it has independent foreign policy, we know Azerbaijan’s place
and role in Eurasia, international relations and we know how it will
be afterwards. That’s why being self-confident we demand equal-right
and just relations with all. This is our right.

Actually, the West is aware of it. The West is aware of Azerbaijan’s
potentials and realizes Azerbaijan’s importance very well. Year after
year Azerbaijan’s position, role and importance will increase in the
ongoing processes in the world. The doors are open to continue the
negotiations. But it is impossible to say when and where the meeting
will take place. The co-chairs will visit the region. It will be
possible to make a decision after they have talks with both sides.

-Is it possible to meet during the inauguration of Russian newly
elected President Dmitriy Medvedev?

-I don’t think so, because Russians have no traditions to invite to
the inauguration of the president. If there will be such invitation
and the presidents will attend the ceremony, then we can say something.

-May NATO Declaration supporting Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity
be a guarantee of world community for non-violation of the territorial
integrity of our country?

-Undoubtedly, sooner or later, Nagorno Karabakh status will be
restored within the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan. Nagorno
Karabakh is the historic part of Azerbaijan. Armenians despite
their efforts should realize that Azerbaijan will never allow them
to separate Nagorno Karabakh. It has no alternative. Azerbaijan has
changed since early 1990s and has become strong. All Europe, Islamic
world and our neighbors understand the importance of Azerbaijan in
the global processes. Azerbaijani foreign policy is directed toward
the mutual useful cooperation with all countries, which does not
damage anyone. Peaceful neighborhood and useful cooperation is the
main principles of our foreign policy. We have no problems with not
only Georgia and Turkey, but also with Iran and Russia. Armenians
should know once for all that Nagorno Karabakh has never been
recognized as an independent body, is not recognized today and will
never be recognized. All over the world take Azerbaijan’s position
into consideration. Azerbaijan is strengthening its position day
after day. The UN resolution reflects the UN position and carries
the global weight. This document supports Azerbaijan’s territorial
integrity and considers the peaceful solution of the conflict within
the OSCE Minsk Group advisable. NATO Final Declaration also coincides
with the UN resolution. An article in the Declaration shows that NATO
member countries support the territorial integrity, independence and
sovereignty of Azerbaijan and at the same time NATO concerns about
the non-solution of the conflict. It is very objective position,
which makes Azerbaijan’s stance stronger and is also guarantee for
the territorial integrity of our country. International organizations
exist not to make statements and to change it later. Leaders of the
world leading countries and international organizations stated that
Kosovo couldn’t be a precedent for other conflicts. It means that
their position on Azerbaijan and Nagorno Karabakh is different. If they
doubt over the Nagorno Karabakh issue they didn’t speak about Kosovo
as it couldn’t be as a precedent and made different statements. But
every one concretely said that Kosovo shouldn’t be considered as a
precedent for other conflicts.

-Did Azerbaijan receive reply from OSCE to its request for mechanism
of changing the Minsk Group Co-Chairs?

-They cannot reply. Simply it was necessary for us. It happened
suddenly and surprised and made us regretful, because co-chair
countries said they had supported Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity,
but showed opposite position during a voting. It is difficult to
explain it. We requested OSCE as an independent country showing
its foreign policy course. It needs to keep at least two important
sides of these processes on focus. At first, the co-chairs lose the
confidence of Azerbaijani Government, opposition and population. The
world community expects fairness in these relations and we also demand
our rights. Secondly, it is negative case for the international
relations. There are leading countries in the world, which have
established international relations, UN and other international
organizations after the World War II. There is a theoretical ground,
which unites the international law, its norms and principles and bases
on the documents, conventions, treaties and regulations. Nearly 200
countries in the world are interested in the fair processes regulated
by legal norms. The parts violating these norms are known. In fact the
weak parts cannot violate, always the powers violate the norms, which
change opinions about them in Azerbaijan and all over the world. It is
important issue. Even when the most powerful country loses confidence,
it starts losing many things. There were super powers in the world
history, which existed for 100, 200 and 500 years and later lost
confidence and left the scene of history. We are vowing our protest
today, but tens of countries accept it as a resistance.

-Are there any pressures against Azerbaijan to hold referendum on
the future status of Nagorno Karabakh? There are pressures against
official Baku on amendments to the Constitution to hold referendum
in Nagorno Karabakh, according some information…

-It is impossible to put pressure on Azerbaijani President and
Azerbaijan on any issues, including it. Azerbaijan has not faced this
issue and it cannot be any time. Azerbaijani Constitution has been
adopted once and Azerbaijan will further take step with it. Armenia
and its supporters often raised such issues for their interests.

Condition should be created for this referendum. Nagorno Karabakh
should be returned to status quo before referendum. Azerbaijanis
should return to their lands. Several years need to establish normal
life. Referendum should be held in all territories of Azerbaijan
basing on Azerbaijani Constitution. Azerbaijan will not agree to other
version. It is impossible to achieve something by means of pressure.

-Islamic Countries have supported Azerbaijan on Voting for Resolution
in UN. But we have not seen such support from CIS countries. How can
you explain it?

– There are a lot of problems in Islamic World. Unjust approaches
caused to these problems. Therefore Islamic Countries are very
sensitive in such situations and the support is natural. The West
should take position of Islamic World into account. There is not
eternal thing in the world. Islamic World is big. The West should
listen and deal with Islamic World and should be ready for negotiations
and understand it. If the West does not do it, it will cause damage
to it. It is normal that Islamic World supports Azerbaijan. It is not
true to separate international relations into Islamic World and West,
Christian World. Everybody should protect justice and be just.

-Russia has lifted sanctions on economy and transport against
Abkhazia. Does Azerbaijan continue sanctions?

-Russia’s decision is its position. We have not changed our position
on it, certainly we will continue sanctions.

-What is Azerbaijan’s position on the establishment of Russia-Armenia
Union State?

-This is an idea. I cannot say anything concretely. Russia could not
establish Union State with Belarus. Armenia is a province of Russia
and everything belongs to Russia. Russia controls biggest companies,
energy supply, transport. Union State is very suspicious for me. If
it is as a former USSR, it will be controlled by the centre. There
is no need to name it Union State. Two equal right states should be
represented in real Union State. I don’t consider it successful step
and I have great suspicion for its future.