Training Courses Of Diaspora Armenian Teachers To Be Held From July

TRAINING COURSES OF DIASPORA ARMENIAN TEACHERS TO BE HELD JULY 20-AUGUST 17 IN YEREVAN

ARMENPRESS
May 25, 2009

YEREVAN, MAY 25, ARMENPRESS: The Armenian Education and Culture
Ministry will from July 20-August 17 organize training courses for
teachers of Armenian colleges, schools, kinder-gardens and one-day
educational centers in the foreign states.

Public relations department of Armenian Education and Culture Ministry
told Armenpress that the training will be held on the differentiated
program approved by the Ministry. The teachers who have finished the
courses will be provided with corresponding certificates as well as
teaching-methodological literature, text-books and other materials.

Preference will be given to the teachers who have not been trained in
Armenia during the last three years. Meetings, familiarizing-teaching
visits and cultural projects are also intended for the participants.

The Stepanaket Airport Intended To Be Exploited In October 2010

THE STEPANAKERT AIRPORT INTENDED TO BE EXPLOITED IN OCTOBER 2010

ARMENPRESS
May 25, 2009

STEPANAKERT, MAY 25, ARMENPRESS: The preparatory works of
reconstruction of the Stepanakert airport have kicked off.

Head of the "Horizon-95" construction organization which is the
contractor for construction of the airport and the passenger complex
Gagik Galstian told Armenpress that after a long pause the first
plane can land in Artsakh already in October 2010.

Parallel to this the "Horizon-95" concurrently starts the construction
of the Stepanakert laboratory of agricultural food and the building
of Nagorno Karabakh Chief Court in Shushi.

Analyzing The Election Campaign …

ANALYZING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN …

armradio.am
25.05.2009 16:32

President of the Union of the political scientist of Armenia Hmayak
Howhannisyan analyzed the election campaign and the strategy of the
municipality in the club "de facto right". None of the election
campaign satisfied him. In terms of political technologies, he
noticed many failures in various political camps. The Union of the
political scientist of Armenia conducted two public opinion polls:
at the beginning and at the end of the election campaign. The results
of the public opinion polls indicate that 64.5% of the townspeople
will go to the elections. In his opinion there are no serious events
developing to expect after elections.

Turkey, Armenia, and the Azerbaijan delay

Boston Globe, MA
May 24 2009

Turkey, Armenia, and the Azerbaijan delay

By David L. Phillips
May 24, 2009

THE RECENT announcement normalizing Turkish-Armenian relations is a
potentially historic breakthrough. However, the lack of progress in
implementing the "framework agreement" raises questions about Turkey’s
intentions and resolve. Turkey’s prime minister, Tayyip Erdogan, is
buckling to domestic opposition and objections from Azerbaijan.
Moreover, the announcement of the normalization "road map" on the eve
of Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day looks like a cynical effort to
dissuade President Obama from characterizing the events of 1915-1923
as genocide.

The central dispute between Turkey and Armenia involves the occupation
of territories in Azerbaijan, as well as divergent historical
narratives. While some Turks refer to suffering at the end of the
Ottoman Empire as a "shared tragedy," Armenians and others call it
"genocide." After the Soviet Union’s demise and Armenia’s
independence, Armenian forces sought to safeguard the ethnic-Armenian
enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh. In so doing, they displaced about 800,000
Azerbaijanis and occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan.

The Obama administration is committed to good relations with Turkey
and Armenia. Both are US allies and help counter global extremism.
Turkey’s cooperation is critical to US efforts in Afghanistan,
redeploying troops from Iraq, and constraining Iran’s nuclear
development. The Armenian-American community ensures that US-Armenia
ties are permanent and strong.

US mediation was indispensable to the agreement on normalization and
recognition, which Turkish and Armenian officials initialed April
2. The accord establishes a binational commission, a series of
subcommissions, and specifies a timetable for implementation. The
agreement does not, however, take effect until both countries sign
it. Getting from initials to implementation is far from guaranteed.

After meeting with Turkish officials on April 7 in Istanbul, Obama
concluded that resolution of Nagorno-Karabakh was not a formal
precondition for normalization and recognition. But as a practical
matter it is a deal-breaker. Armenian and Azerbaijani negotiators
agree on "basic ideas" for resolving Nagorno-Karabakh’s status, but
work is still needed before the parties approve the proposal.

Turkey’s interests cannot be held hostage by Azerbaijan. The United
States should reaffirm Obama’s understanding: there is no link between
normalizing Turkish-Armenian relations and negotiations between
Armenia and Azerbaijan. Just as there should be no linkage between
normalization and the status of Nagorno-Karabakh, there must be no
linkage between normalization and genocide recognition.

From 2001-2004, I chaired the Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation
Commission, which sought a legal analysis on "The applicability of the
United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide
to events that occurred in the early 20th century."

The analysis determined that international law prohibits the
retroactive application of treaties.

The analysis also defined the crime of genocide: (i) the perpetrator
killed one or more persons; (ii) such person or persons belonged to a
particular national, racial, or religious group; (iii) the perpetrator
intended to destroy in whole or in part that group, as such; and, (iv)
the conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar
conduct directed against the group. Of the criteria, "intent" is the
only one in dispute. The analysis determined that Ottoman figures who
ordered the deportation knew the consequence of their actions and
therefore possessed the requisite genocidal intent.

The finding is not legally binding, but it did give something to both
peoples that can aid the goal of reconciliation.

The commission emphasized open discussion between Turks and
Armenians. So-called track two activities – contact, communication,
and cooperation – help foster mutual understanding, co-mingle
interests, and build trust. To this end, Western governments should
establish a fund for collaborative activities. Civil society
cooperation can consolidate an official agreement; it can also serve
as a safety net if talks founder.

Track two is not, however, a substitute for official diplomacy. The
Obama administration must stay engaged to help Turkey and Armenia
formalize the agreement. Standing with the proponents of
reconciliation puts the United States on the right side of history.

David L. Phillips is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and a
visiting scholar at Columbia University.

torial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/05/24/turkey_arm enia_and_the_azerbaijan_delay/

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/edi

Turk FM intends to discuss Azeri-Turkish and Armenian-Turkish relns

Turkish foreign minister intends to discuss Azeri-Turkish and
Armenian-Turkish relations with Azerbaijani leadership

2009-05-23 14:48:00

ArmInfo. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said in Damascus,
Saturday, that he intends to discuss Azeri-Turkish and Armenian-Turkish
relations with Azerbaijani leadership, Trend reports.

Turkey pays much attention to the Karabakh peace process, he said.

Davutoglu will leave Damascus for Baku, where the 36th sitting of the
Council of foreign ministries of the Organization of Islamic Conference
has started today and will last three days.

Turkish Businessmen May Acquire Armenian Nuclear Power Plant’s Share

TURKISH BUSINESSMEN MAY ACQUIRE ARMENIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT’S SHARES, BUT TURKISH COMPANIES NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN ITS CONSTRUCTION

Noyan Tapan
May 22, 2009

YEREVAN, MAY 22. NOYAN TAPAN. At the May 19 sitting, the National
Security Council of the RA heard the RA Minister of Energy and Natural
Resources Armen Movsisian’s report on the current stage of the program
on construction of a new nuclear power unit in Armenia, discussed the
steps taken in this direction until now and approved these steps. As
the minister said at the RA National Assembly on May 20, by the
government’s decision, an Australian company’s U.S. subsidiary has
been selected the contractor of the power unit’s construction, and it
will select companies to do construction work, control the operation
and the training of employees, etc. 13 companies submitted bids for
participation in the tender, and competition went between two of them.

In response to the concern expressed by member of "ARF" faction Ara
Nranian that for political reasons the construction of the power
plant’s new unit may also be entrusted to a Turkish construction
organization (among others), the minister said that there is no
Turkish company doing construction of nuclear power units. It is quite
another matter that there are no restrictions on investment making,
and Turkish companies may also acquire a certain number of the power
plant’s shares. A. Movsisian underlined that regardless of who will
be the owners, the nuclear power plant will be operated under Armenian
laws and international agreements.

TBILISI: Armenia Says Nagorny Karabakh ‘Separate’ From Turkey Relati

ARMENIA SAYS NAGORNY KARABAKH ‘SEPARATE’ FROM TURKEY RELATIONS

The FINANCIAL
May 22 2009
Georgia

The FINANCIAL — YEREVAN, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan said on
May 22 that Armenian-Turkish ties should be kept separate from the
Nagorny Karabakh conflict.

Turkey is a key ally of Armenia’s neighbor Azerbaijan in the conflict
between the two ex-Soviet states over Nagorny Karabakh, a disputed
region in Azerbaijan with a largely Armenian population.

"Relations between Armenia and Turkey are a separate issue, discussed
during bilateral talks, while negotiations on the Nagorny Karabakh are
a different topic for discussions," Sargsyan told a news conference
after a meeting with Croatian President Stjepan Mesic in Yerevan.

The Armenian leader said Turkey still had a chance to convince the
international community and the Armenian people that it was a modern
country, which conducts its policies on the basis of international law.

Sargsyan and Turkish leader Abdullah Gul met in Prague in May and
agreed to try to rebuild relations within a reasonable timeframe and
without any preconditions.

Armenia and Turkey have had no diplomatic relations since the
Soviet Union broke up in 1991. However, they agreed to a "roadmap"
to normalize their relations under Swiss mediation in April this year.

Turkey closed its border with Armenia in 1993 in a show of support
for Azerbaijan following a bloody conflict over Nagorny Karabakh. Over
35,000 people died in fighting over the area in the early 1990s before
a ceasefire was signed in 1994. Nagorny Karabakh technically remains
part of Azerbaijan, but has its own de facto government.

Turkey Shows Its Discomfiting Side … Again

TURKEY SHOWS ITS DISCOMFITING SIDE … AGAIN
By Seto Boyajian

-shows-its-discomfiting-side-again/
May 22, 2009

Turks used to loath Arabs enough that they preferred to forego
delicious Arab pastries so as to avoid meeting an Arab. Turks even
coined a boastful saying to this effect – "Ne Shamin shekeri, ne
Arapin yuzu" (Neither the sweets of Damascus, nor the face of the
Arab). Armenians by tradition do not nurture such vulgar prejudicial
practices toward other people and nations, epecially towards Arabs,
who have been generous hosts by welcoming into their lands and by
caring for thousands of Armenians fleeing the state-organized Ottoman
Turkish massacres from 1915 to 1923.

Armenians, however, dealing for so many centuries with the Turks,
have developed a keen understanding of the Turkish state of mind in
matters of safety, security and trade. This experience has taught
Armenians that words of the Turkish leadership do not translate into
their true meaning when they are put into action. For this reason,
it would be most appropriate to adapt the above Turkish saying with
a corrective twist – "Ne Turkin sozi, nede onun ishi" (Neither the
Turk’s word, nor his action).

Recent pronouncements by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
come once again to prove, unfortunately, that the disparity between
Turkish word and action is real. It appears that this discomfiting
Turkish attitude towards Armenia and Armenians has become engrained
in Turkish body politic.

Last week, during his visit to Azerbaijan, Erdogan reiterated that
Turkey will neither reopen the border and nor establish diplomatic
relations with Armenia so long as the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict remains
unresolved. Despite the ongoing bilateral negotiations between Armenia
and Turkey, he explicitly reaffirmed the position that there was a
linkage between those negotiations and the Karabakh problem.

At the joint press conference with Azeri President Ilham Aliyev,
Erdogan made this position crystal clear. He stated, "Occupation of
Karabakh is the cause here and closing of the border is the effect. It
is impossible for us to open the border unless that occupation ends."

While in Russia, Erdogan sought Russia’s support for his country’s
bid for a role in the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process. At a joint news
meeting with Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, he claimed that
"Turkey and Russia have responsibilities in the region." He said,
"We have to take steps for the peace and wellbeing of the region. This
includes the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the Middle East dispute,
and the Cyprus issue."

In diplomatic parlance, Erdogan’s claims can only serve the dual
purpose of undermining the Karabakh peace process supervised by the
OSCE Minsk Group (co-chaired by France, Russia, and the U.S.) and
trivializing the ongoing talks with Armenia. Erdogan’s linkage of the
two processes is now beginning to be viewed as an exercise harboring
danger to the peace and stability in the region. So much so that,
at the beginning of this week, the OSCE Minsk Group delegated one
of its co-chairs, Ambassador Bernard Fassier, to Turkey to warn the
Turkish government on its recent linkage policy.

According to Turkish daily Hurriyet, the French co-chair attempted to
impress upon Turkey that the Karabakh peace process cannot be linked
to the normalization of Armenia-Turkey relations, and warned Ankara
that any attempt to link the two can harm both processes. Ambassador
Fassier asserted, "The normalization of Armenia-Turkey relations should
not be confused with the Karabakh conflict. These are different and
parallel processes." He further stressed that for the Minsk Group,
as well as the U.S., Turkey-Armenia negotiations and Karabakh peace
talks are separate processes.

All this adds up to one fact. Namely, words and action are not
correlated in Turkish diplomacy. The tragic aspect of this reality
is that the Obama administration – despite its predecessors’ vast
experience in Turkish unreliability unless supported by billions of
dollars of American money and/or diplomatic/political concessions at
the expense of American values and principles – has yet to learn not
to trust Turkey without verification.

With regards to the promisingly budding "friendly" relations between
Turkey and Armenia, the Obama administration was duped into accepting
Turkey’s word as opposed to its real intents and action. As soon
as the April 24 Presidential Statement was issued, the April 22nd
Armenian-Turkish foreign ministerial joint statement with its fanciful
"roadmap" wore out its utility. Now, the National Security Advisor,
the White House Chief of Staff, and the U.S. Ambassador to the United
Nations have to explain to the President Turkey’s linkage policy that
is endangering the parallel yet separate processes of Turkey-Armenia
negotiations and the Karabakh conflict resolution.

The trio advisors pressingly urged the President – and they carried
the day – to avoid the word Genocide without serious consideration of
the Turkish intent. They failed to grasp that Turkey was playing for
time – at least until April 24, because Turkey would never seriously
entertain the possibility of opening its borders and establish normal
diplomatic relation with Armenia, unless the following three conditions
are met by Armenia:

a. Cessation of the pursuit of the Armenian Genocide recognition
internationally;

b. Acceptance of the voided October 1923 Kars Treaty; and,

c. Return of Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijani jurisdiction.

With all the Turkish hoopla and hype, the President’s said top
advisors did not get and still do not get that Armenia will always be a
hindrance to Turkish strategic designs beyond the Caucasus, that Turkey
cherishes regional interests in conflict to U.S. interests, and that
Turkey seeks to boost its regional role to the detriment of the U.S.

These geopolitical factors should raise serious concern with our
President and his advisers. Hopefully, the next time around, they
too will begin to appreciate the Armenian experience and acquire the
expertise to detect the distinction between Turkish word and action.

http://www.asbarez.com/2009/05/22/turkey

Congress Observes Municipal Elections

CONGRESS OBSERVES MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS

Panorama.am
13:34 21/05/2009

A delegation of the Council of Europe Congress of Local and Regional
Authorites will observe the first municipal elections in Yerevan,
Armenia, on 31 May. The Congress delegation will be headed by Nigel
Mermagen, (UK, ILDG).

As part of the co-operation between the Council of Europe and the
European Union, the delegation will include three members of the EU
Committee of the Regions.

Prior to the Election Day, the delegation will meet with Armen
Gevorgyan, Minister for Territorial Administration and Vice-Prime
Minister of Armenia and Garegin Azaryan, Head of the Central Electoral
Commission.

As a follow-up to the Congress pre-electoral mission (4-6 May 2009),
further encounters with candidates running for the post of Mayor of
Yerevan are planned. The delegation will receive feedback on latest
developments of the electoral campaign from representatives of media
(private and state media) as well as from NGOs representatives.