Standing Up To Barack & Co: Armenia, 3m Realpolitik, And The Integri

STANDING UP TO BARACK & CO: ARMENIA, 3M REALPOLITIK, AND THE INTEGRITY THING
Raffi K. Hovannisian

200 9/07/31 | 22:48

Politics

Yerevan, July 31-It is often easier to fight for one’s principles than
to live up to them. In another time but at the same place, presidential
contender Adlai Stevenson was setting the scene generations later
for President Obama and his administration.

As unfair as it is to be held up as everyone’s lighthouse of liberty
and justice, Barack Obama was elected president on his self-projection
as that very beacon. He and his world-power colleagues, for both
principle and posterity, must not allow themselves the comfort,
however transient, to play feel-good god in mockery of historical
tragedy and in defiance of contemporary imperatives to right the
wrongs of the past.

Earlier this month, G8 leaders Obama, Sarkozy, and Medvedev issued
a joint declaration softly pre-imposing a superpower solution on
Armenia and the freedom-loving people of Artsakh, otherwise known
as Mountainous Karabagh. Years before recognition of Kosovo and
Abkhazia became current fashion and counter-fashion, Karabagh
was the first autonomous territory of the old USSR to challenge
Stalin’s divide-and-conquer legacy and to raise the standard of
decolonization and liberation from its Soviet Azerbaijani yoke by
means of a constitutional referendum on independence in December 1991.

Azerbaijan responded to this legitimate quest for self-determination
with a failed war of aggression, resulting as it did in tens of
thousands of casualties, more than a million refugees, countless
lost birthrights, collaterally damaged cultural heritage, and a new
strategic balance on both sides of the bitter divide, and so sued
for ceasefire in May 1994.

Barack and company now wish for the Armenians, having suffered both an
unrequited genocide and the greatest ever of national dispossessions
at the hands of Ottoman Turkey nearly a century ago, to cede even more
of their ancestral patrimony and their newly-achieved sovereignty
by calling on them to withdraw unilaterally from "occupied" areas
belonging to the Republic of Mountainous Karabagh in exchange for
some foggy-bottomed diplomatic formulation about a future plebiscite.

Armenia says no, thank you.

If President Barack Obama and his distinguished new-age colleagues
want to demonstrate that the conscience of humanity has survived
the second millennium, that equity can still obtain in international
affairs, and that an even and comprehensive application of the law,
not self-serving parochial politics, rules this century, then they
might wake up to a new mirror and proclaim the following.

Should Mountainous Karabagh or any of its constituent parts be
considered by anybody as occupied, then clearly the historical Armenian
heartlands of Shahumian, Getashen, Gardmank, and Nakhichevan must
immediately be acknowledged to be under Azerbaijani occupation. Worse
yet, official Baku is demolishing, with malice aforethought, the
last vestiges of Armenian Christian heritage in its jurisdiction,
the most recent documented crime of dastardly proportions having taken
place in December 2005 upon the no-longer-existent medieval chapels,
cross-stones, and divine offerings at Jugha, Nakhichevan. Had
the perpetrator been the Taliban-or the victim a sacred Semitic
cemetery-America, Europe, Russia, and all of world civilization would
have been rightfully outraged and demanded remedial action forthwith.

If the rule of law is not a hoax or a decoy or an instrument
of whim and duress, then the Mighty Three must together-and
simultaneously-recognize Kosovo, Abkhazia, and Mountainous Karabagh
as independent states fitting the definitional requirements of the
Montevideo Convention. All must be recognized by all, or else none
by none. The sui generis argument is distinction without difference.

The government of republican Turkey-the successor regime bearing the
rights and obligations of its genocidal predecessor-can no longer play
dog-and-tail tag with the United States, the European Union, and the
Russian Federation. Ankara’s normally astute diplomacy has forgone
the 18-year opportunity since Armenia’s declaration of sovereignty to
establish official relations with it without the positing by either
side of any political preconditions. It has, most unfortunately, done
so from the very beginning first by presenting preconditions of its
own (including those turning on Karabagh and "occupied" territories),
then holding Armenia in an unlawful blockade tantamount to an act of
war, and finally speaking the language of blackmail and double-down
intrigue with Washington, Brussels, and Moscow.

Of course, the trinity of power all have talked the walk pursuant to
their own petty interests of the day. President Obama’s double-speak
on genocide and its shameful denial, at Ankara in April followed by
Buchenwald* in June, is a classic in point. But if Obama and friends
are serious about the new global order, then they might find the
fortitude to remind Turkey, as key partner and good neighbor, that it
stands in occupation of the ancient Armenian homeland and owes a debt
of atonement and redemption to the Armenian nation. And no crowning
Bolshevik-Kemalist compact from 1921, a full generation before
Molotov-Ribbentrop, can serve to rationalize the great genocide,
nor purport to regulate the relations and frontiers between the
modern Republics of Turkey and Armenia. That is their sovereign duty
mutually to resolve, but if anyone in Washington or elsewhere requires
guidance on crimes against humanity, ways and means of restitution, and
definitions of occupation, "the memory hole" of expedient forgetting
can be duly overcome in the US National Archives, its records on the
Armenian genocide, and most poignantly the provisions of President
Woodrow Wilson’s arbitral award, issued under his seal in November
1920 and legally controlling to this day, to Armenia and its people.

Now, who was taking that pledge to liberty and justice for all? It
was us, and Obama: "We must be ever-vigilant about the spread of evil
in our own time, that we must reject the false comfort that others’
suffering is not our problem, and commit ourselves to resisting those
who would subjugate others to serve their own interests."*

Raffi K. Hovannisian was independent Armenia’s first minister of
foreign affairs.

http://hetq.am/en/politics/14019/

Georgia Wants U.S. to Monitor Conflict

Georgia Wants U.S. to Monitor Conflict

The New York Times
July 21, 2009

By ELLEN BARRY

KIEV, Ukraine ‘ Georgian leaders hope the United States will join the
European Union’s monitoring effort along the boundary with two
breakaway Georgian enclaves, a step they believe could deter
aggression from Russian or separatist forces, a senior Georgian
official said Monday.

The European Union’s 246 monitors in Georgia are unarmed civilians and
are not allowed into the enclaves, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, which
Russian forces wrested from Georgian control in a short war a year
ago. Still, the official, Eka Tkeshelashvili, the secretary of
Georgia’s National Security Council, said broadening the monitoring
mission to include the United States and other nonunion members would
make it `politically very costly to Russia to do anything on the
ground.’

`It has the potential for reaching a very tangible impact,’ she
said. `It’s always very hard to think what are the red lines that
ultimately Russia might respect, because we saw last year that it
passed most of the red lines that we could have imagined.’

The European Union’s members are having an `informal discussion’ about
whether to invite the United States to participate, a requirement for
any such expansion, said Peter Semneby, the union’s special
representative for the South Caucasus. He said the European Union has
`taken note of the interest on the Georgian side,’ but the decision is
not yet formally on any agenda.

The question will almost certainly come up this week, when Vice
President Joseph R. Biden Jr. is scheduled to meet with leaders in
Ukraine and Georgia. His visit, after President Obama’s meeting with
the Russian president, Dmitri A. Medvedev, in Moscow, is aimed at
reassuring the countries that American support will remain despite an
improvement in Russian relations.

Mr. Biden’s reaction to the monitoring proposal will offer one clue to
how far that support extends: Participating would assert Washington’s
concern
It would also challenge Russia, which wants the United States to
scale back its involvement in post-Soviet republics.

Mr. Biden intends to make it clear on this trip that the United States
will not abandon its allies in deference to Russia, said one of his
senior advisers.

`We will continue to reject the notion of spheres of influence,’
Antony J. Blinken, Mr. Biden’s national security adviser, said in a
conference call with reporters last week. `We will continue to stand
by the principle that sovereign democracies have the right to make
their own decisions and choose their own partnerships and alliances.’

At the same time, said one American official who was not authorized to
speak publicly, `there will also be some tough love in both places.’

The official said Mr. Biden would press both countries to address
their failings ‘ mostly economic ones in Ukraine and political ones in
Georgia ‘ and also make clear to Georgian leaders that they should
have no illusions about using force to reclaim South Ossetia and
Abkhazia.

Every note Mr. Biden strikes will be analyzed `very, very carefully’
in Moscow, said Andranik Migranyan, an analyst in New York at the
Institute of Democracy and Cooperation, a Kremlin-backed research
group. Leaders in the Kremlin were impressed by Mr. Obama but consider
Mr. Biden’s visit to Kiev and Tbilisi, Georgia, a truer indicator of
American intentions, he said.

Mr. Biden could send the message that `sovereignty is equal to
anti-Russian policy and anti-Russian sentiment, which means nullifying
the results of the Obama and Medvedev and Putin summit,’ he said,
referring to the Russian prime minister, Vladimir
V. Putin. Alternately, he said, Mr. Biden could give a different
message: `We ask you to be more responsible in your behavior, not to
be hostile toward Russia.’

`In this case,’ Mr. Migranyan said, `Moscow can really think that
Obama took Russia’s concerns seriously.’

A decision about joining the monitoring mission leaves little room for
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the United
Nations operated missions in South Ossetia and Abkhazia; Americans
participated in both. This year, both were shut down under pressure
from Moscow, which argued that the organizations needed to either
recognize the enclaves’ sovereignty or leave.

That leaves only the European Union’s mission ‘ civilians who work out
of field offices near the edges of South Ossetia and
Abkhazia. America’s contribution could be personnel, upgraded
equipment or technical assistance like access to satellite images,
Ms. Tkeshelashvili said.

David J. Kramer, who was a senior diplomat in the administration of
President George W. Bush, said American participation would reinforce
powerfully the need for stability along the enclaves’
boundaries. Already, simply by visiting Ukraine and Georgia, he added,
Mr. Biden is making it clear that the United States will still respond
to post-Soviet countries reaching out.

`This is not a case of the United States forcing its way into regions
where it’s not wanted ‘ Georgia wants us there,’ said Mr. Kramer, who
is also a senior trans-Atlantic fellow at the German Marshall Fund, a
nonpartisan policy group that studies the relationship between the
United States and Europe. `We’re never going to compete with Russia in
terms of proximity, and we shouldn’t even try. But these are countries
that want closer relations with the United States.’

Peter Baker contributed reporting from Washington.

ld/europe/21georgia.html?hp

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/21/wor

Economic Decline In Armenia In 2009 To Exceed 10% On A Conservative

ECONOMIC DECLINE IN ARMENIA IN 2009 TO EXCEED 10% ON A CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE: ADVISER TO ARMENIAN PARLIAMENTARY SPEAKER

ArmInfo
2009-07-31 13:51:00

ArmInfo. Economic decline in Armenia in 2009 will exceed 10% on a
conservative estimate, Tatul Manaseryan, the Adviser to Armenian
Parliamentary Speaker for Economic Affairs, told media on Friday.

"I am not among optimistic economists who believe that crisis will be
overcome already in 2009. Quite on the contrary, I believe that that
this can hardly be expected even in 2010. Armenia should exert genuine
efforts to maintain even zero growth," T. Manaseryan said. He thinks
that unfavorable balance in import and export may grow as well. "In
this context, the government should focus on the industrial sector
and sales of import substitution products," he said. As regards
the foreign exchange market, the government should take certain
regulatory measures there. "I expect no serious fluctuation there
but the government will have to apply certain mechanisms to avoid
unpredictable scenarios in the market in conditions of instable
economic situation," T. Manaseryan said.

National Statistical Service of Armenia reported 6.8% growth of GDP
for 2008 versus 2007 (nearly 3650 billion drams of $11.9 billion).

A Personal View: For Armenians Like Me, The Loss Of A Lovely Home Vi

A PERSONAL VIEW: FOR ARMENIANS LIKE ME, THE LOSS OF A LOVELY HOME VILLAGE HURTS
By Sara Khojoyan

Institute for War and Peace Reporting IWPR
July 27 2009
UK

In my passport, my place of birth is listed as the Republic of
Azerbaijan. Of course, it was not the Azerbaijan of today, because
I am an Armenian, but the Soviet Socialist Republic, back in 1983,
before the conflict between our two peoples over Nagorny Karabakh.

In 1988, the troubles started and my family fled our home in an area
of Azerbaijan close to Karabakh. We have never been back.

I have many other relatives who are refugees. Although my grandparents
fled the village of Khanlar in the Dashkesan region – which was
inhabited by both Azeris and Armenians – most of my other relatives
came from Zaglik, which was for centuries purely Armenian.

In the 15 years since the ceasefire, they have lost hope that they
will ever return to the land where their ancestors are buried. They
cannot get used to the politicians’ talk of a "return of territory". If
they cannot go back, why should Azeris be able to?

"Our Zaglik was heaven on earth, but we understand we will never
get it back. Both sides now have what they have and you cannot turn
back the clock. I had many Azeri friends, and I am sure that they
think the same. Politicians are a long way from the common people,"
said my uncle, Ashot Khojaian.

In Armenia, almost everyone is connected to the Karabakh
conflict. Although few men actually fought, everyone knows someone
who did. Take Mher Davoian, the editor of the magazine where I used
to work. He and a friend were the only survivors from their division,
and hid in the forests for a week, having been given up for dead.

And now, when almost every week politicians discuss the return of
territory, my former editor refuses to believe it.

"I organised an opinion poll across all of Armenia and I know that
it’s not just me, it’s 80 per cent of Armenians who are ready to take
up arms to defend what belongs to us. This is even though I know that
there won’t be a second war," he said.

And he’s right. Ordinary Armenians cannot countenance giving up Nagorny
Karabakh. Levon Manvelian, my future father-in-law, took three years
to get over the psychological damage he suffered in the war, when he
had to gather up the pieces of his best friend. When he hears talk
of the interim status that the international mediators want to assign
to Karabakh under the Madrid Principles, he just laughs.

"Nagorny Karabakh already has a status. I don’t understand why our
authorities don’t stand by this. I do understand, however, what a
dirty business politics is, and maybe they don’t have the power to
do more than they are. But we the people are strong enough, just like
we were 20 years ago," he told me.

Ordinary people are a long way from diplomacy, and maybe do not
understand the niceties of the principles laid out for regulating the
conflict. A week ago, all the commentators in Armenia started talking
about resolving the Karabakh conflict along the lines of the Madrid
Principles. People at bus stops and coffee shops across the whole
of Yerevan could be heard saying things like, "Apparently, they are
going to return the territory. This cannot be allowed to happen."

I was born on Azeri territory but I have never thought of it as my
homeland. However, I have also never doubted that the village of
Zaglik, in which generations of my ancestors were born and died, is
Armenian land. It is land controlled by Azerbaijan, but it is where
my mother dreams of going, so she can visit the graves of my family.

But this does not trouble me. We are talking here about the territorial
integrity of Azerbaijan. It troubles me that no one in the world
seems to understand that Nagorny Karabakh is not a part of Azerbaijan,
and this is not a question of diplomacy. It is a question of memory,
and this is something we all have.

Many people do not know this, just as they do not know about Zaglik,
my home, which I will probably never see again.

Sara Khojoyan is the acting director of IWPR’s Armenian office.

Internet Night Service Available For Postpaid Subscribers

INTERNET NIGHT SERVICE AVAILABLE FOR POSTPAID SUBSCRIBERS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
27.07.2009 15:56 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ VivaCell-MTS Mobile Operator announced about the
availability of "Internet Night" service for postpaid subscribers
of VivaCell-MTS.

By activating the service, subscribers will be able to use Internet
paying only AMD 40 per MB during the night hours (from 1 to 9 a.m.).

As VivaCell-MTS Press Secretary Vahe Isahakyan told PanARMENIAN.Net
reporter, the service will be provided to prepaid subscribers at AMD
55 per MB (from 1 to 9 a.m.).

To activate the "Internet Night" dial *145#. Activation fee is AMD 300
(including VAT).

Armenian Community Of Malta Registered

ARMENIAN COMMUNITY OF MALTA REGISTERED

Noyan Tapan
July 24, 2009

VALlETTA, JULY 24 , NOYAN TAPAN. The first conference of the Armenian
community officially registered recently will be held in the Hilton
hotel of Valletta, the capital of Malta. The community head will be
elected during the conference.

As Noyan Tapan was informed by the Department of the Armenian
Communities of Europe of the RA Ministry of Diaspora, the structure has
already put into operation its triglot (Armenian, English, Russian)
official website: According to the responsible
for the we bsi te Ilona Sarukhanian, it is envisaged that the community
will open an Armenian Sunday School in Valletta as well as a khachkar
(commermorative crossstone) perpetuating the memory of the Armenian
Genocide victims will be placed in one of the city streets.

According to the website responsible person’s data, 300-350 Armenians
live in Malta.

www.malta-armenia.eu.

Sergey Shakaryants: The Recent Talks In Moscow Were The Most Importa

SERGEY SHAKARYANTS: THE RECENT TALKS IN MOSCOW WERE THE MOST IMPORTANT
Marianna Gyurjyan

"Radiolur"
22.07.2009 15:55

Political scientist Sergey Shakaryants considers that the latest
meeting in Moscow was the most important, because this time Russian
President Dmitry Medvedev aspired to meet the Armenian and Azerbaijan
Presidents without witnesses. "In a quiet atmosphere they discussed
not only the Karabakh issue, but also the urgent regional questions,"
the political scientist said and added that Presidents Serzh Sargsyan
and Ilham Aliyev discussed the most serious issues, but there was
no breakthrough.

"Since none of the Presidents made any statements following the talks,
we have to judge from the statements of the Minsk Group Co-Chairs,"
political scientist Sergey Shakaryants says.

Which was the position of Armenia in the last talks? "I agree with
Russian experts who say Serzh Sargsyan was leaving the negotiation
room more self-confidently both in Moocow and St. Petersburg," the
political scientist said.

Russia is playing a quite different game in the region, which will
not allow anyone to reconfirm its interests in the South Caucasus
through Turkey. The US has received an alarm that Russia does not
agree to any US program in the given region.

As for the publication of the Madrid Principles, Sergey Shakaryants
considers that the great powers are losing patience. This is not
because of Armenia or Azerbaijan. This is because they do not
understand which direction is more acceptable to Armenians or
Azerbaijanis."

Armenian Expert: Turkey Has Not Yet Decided What It Wants And What I

ARMENIAN EXPERT: TURKEY HAS NOT YET DECIDED WHAT IT WANTS AND WHAT IT SHOULD DO

ArmInfo
2009-07-21 16:48:00

ArmInfo. Turkey has not yet decided what it wants and what it should
do. It is surprised because it has underestimated Azerbaijan’s reaction
and overestimated its own capacities, Director of the Armenian Center
for National and International Studies Richard Kirakosian said during
a press-conference today.

Armenia and Turkey have good prospects for rapprochement but even if
the governments fail to normalize their relations the Armenian-Turkish
border will be opened in the minds of people. People in both countries
are actively discussing this subject and, particularly, the Armenian
Genocide issue, an issue that is a matter of future for Turkey.

Today, much more is expected from Turkey than from Armenia. Turkey is
suffering much bigger pressure than Armenia. The Turkish president and
the prime minister are playing a good policeman, bad policeman game,
a show aimed against Armenia. It is early yet to say if this show is
good or bad.

This show will most probably end in Nov and if nothing serious happens
by that time we will be able to say that it was a bad show. Neither the
United States nor Russia will be happy if this show has no logical end.

If Turkey decides to open its border and to establish diplomatic
relations with Armenia it will be a normal decision rather than
a present.

Armenians From Montreal Celebrating Armenian Festival

ARMENIANS FROM MONTREAL CELEBRATING ARMENIAN FESTIVAL

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
17.07.2009 00:55 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenians from all over Laval, Montreal and
areas even further got together for one of Quebec’s biggest annual
celebrations of Armenian culture in the days leading up to this past
Canada Day.

The Armenian Festival attracted thousands of local Armenians who
enjoyed traditional foods, midway games, dancing and live music,
to remind them of their Armenian roots and culture. As many as 9,000
Laval residents are of Armenian descent, Laval News reports.

Organized as a fundraiser by members of the Sourp Kevork Armenian
Apostolic Church, it is one of the largest festivals local
Armenians stage. "We organize every year an Armenian festival in
Laval and everyone is welcome," said Sarkis Majarian, one of the
organizers. "It’s to collect money to build a church, and for some
activities for the young generation, such as basketball, hockey."

Among the dignitaries who dropped by were the Armenian Orthodox
archbishop from Montreal, Bloc Québécois MP for Laval Nicole Demers,
Chomedey Liberal MNA Guy Ouellette, Laval city councillor Ginette
Bernier and others