Prestigious Event At Britain’s Parliament

PRESTIGIOUS EVENT AT BRITAIN’S PARLIAMENT
By Edwina Charles

KurdishMedia.com
2/12/2007

Hrant Dink’s Memorial at the House of Commons –

On January 30th 2007, at the House of Commons, the Great old Britain’s
neo-gothic Parliament building, a most prestigious commemoration
was held for Hrant Dink’s untimely death. The event was organised
by Eilian Williams of Armenia Solidarity and supported by the London
Nor Serount Cultural Association.

A select group of people including Lord Avebury, gathered at 1 pm
(London time) for a vigil at Parliament Square, led by the famous
defender of Human Rights from the House of Lords.

The proceedings inside the Commons (committee room 8) opened, with
the reading of a special message sent by Tony Simpson, an Editor
of the Quarterly The Spokesman, from Professor Ken Coates, Chairman
of the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation, answering a call from his
cherished friend, Professor Khatchatur Pilikian, who took the floor
to pay his tribute to Hrant Dink, with consummate dramatic skill and
poetic panache, holding the audience in spiritual turmoil.

An original poem dedicated to Hrant Dink followed, written and read
by the authoress herself, Ms Seta Cox.

The second main Speaker was Professor Hovhannes I. Pilikian. He
captivated the guests with his biting humour, and scholarly
references. With the cold eye of an historian, Professor Pilikian
made plain that there were harsh lessons to be learnt from what he
saw as the cold blooded political murder of Hrant Dink, his personal
friend. He spoke fondly of the memories of his friend sitting behind
his dingy desk in a dark and dank newspaper-office (of the AGOS Hrant
published) in the European section of Istanbul …Unlike a post-modern
Western news-media Mogul, Hrant hadn’t made a penny out of his popular
newspaper, still on shoe-strings, after a decade of existence!

Respectfully, Pilikian described Hrant as the pure ‘poor’ traditional
intellectual, totally disinterested in sordid money-making; Hrant was
a pioneer of Armenian Turkish reconciliation and it is for this reason
that Pilikian found his assassination an act of impure politics and
sheer stupidity.

Pilikian spoke movingly and passionately, wanting his captive audience
to understand that Hrant’s unlawful death need not be in vain. "There
are four important lessons to be learnt from this" said the Professor
addressing the audience directly.

As Lesson No.1, Professor Pilikian mourned the waste and sheer
stupidity of political assassinations – he drew a parallel with
the ex-Israeli PM Ariel Sharon’s self-declared assassination – with
approval from the American government – of the Palestinian President
Yasser Arafat, who throughout his life had made every possible
concession to … Israel, finally delivering the much derided Oslo
Agreement … securing Israel’s interests for good!

In Lesson No. 2 we learnt of the abuse of the Armenian question
from the moment of its invention by the Western imperialist powers –
Britain, Germany, Tsarist Russia etc. In their need to control their
Muslim populations, they used the stick of the Christianity of the
Armenian people to beat the Ottoman Sultanate with, to plunder its
economy and finally divide up its vast colonial spoils.

Professor Pilikian proved exhaustively that the genocide of the
Armenians was never caused by a religious war, as even the German
Kaiser, Queen Victoria’ s grandson and a prime culprit of the First
World War, had intended. A pamphlet in Arabic published by the
German Embassy in Syria had survived calling on the Muslim Arabs
(the co-religionists of the Ottoman Turks) to declare jihad=Holy War
upon the Armenians. Not only the true Muslims, the Arab peoples of
the Middle East failed the Imperial German efforts, they moreover
ultimately rebelled against them (the Arab Revolution led by
Shariff Hussein), and received the Armenian survivors of the Ottoman
genocide with open arms in the Middle East. Today, Euro Christian
fundamentalists (perhaps led by the Vatican itself) endanger the
safety of the Armenian communities in the Arab countries by cynically
exploiting the "Christian Armenian" card to keep Turkey out of
the European Union, not because it is ruled by a fascist military
political elite, but because it is a … Muslim country! Professor
Pilikian labelled this " the racist pornography of genocidal politics".

Lesson No. 3 consisted of the similitude between the Jewish Holocaust
and the Genocide of the Armenians, which served as the paradigm for
the Nazi genocide of the Jews. Referring to the pioneering work
of the Sociologist Professor Vahakn Dadrian, Professor Pilikian
emphasized the fact that the national archives (in Bonn) of the
German governments is awash with the eye witness reports of the German
imperial functionaries in Istanbul at the time of the genocid, some,
with notes on the margins by the hand of the Kaiser himself!

Two thousand officers of the German imperial army commanded the Ottoman
armies in situ … and later became the Nazi hierarchy, including
Hoss, the Commandant of Auschwitz. The Jewish- American Ambassador in
Istanbul, Morgenthau frequently made the point in his famous Memoires,
that if the German Imperial Government wanted to, could have instantly
stopped the genocide of the Armenians let alone guide its execution.

The audience sat in hushed silence awaiting for the final Lesson No. 4;
the revelation of what Professor Hovhanness Pilikian labelled as
"the grand secret of the British Empire"/ – complex socio-economic
ideological factors that resulted in setting the British imperialist
mindset, secretly provoking genocides, for world-domination.

Similar views are well-established by the work of the American
Professor Noam Chomsky, concerning the attempts at world-domination
by the American political elite.

What was highly original in Professor Pilikian’s own theorizing
was the extraordinary fusion of well-rehearsed historical facts –
the Malthusianism of British politics still active today in the
Thatcherism of the New Labour – blaming the poor for their lot, and
wishing to control their fertility ; The birth of the grotesque Eugenic
movement in Britain, with modern echoes in the US perpetrated by Ku
Klux Clan-type organizations ; He spoke about Social Darwinism which
advocated the Superiority of the Western Christian race – meaning
of course, the Victorian British – entirely grounded on Darwin’s
pseudo-scientific Origin of the Species, the original First Edition
(1859) title of which is nevermore published (thank god!). It reads
(incredibly for modern tastes) – "On the Origin of Species by Means
of Natural Selection or the preservation of favoured Races in the
Struggle for Life". In that use of the conjunctive "or" – Professor
Pilikian pointed out, hangs a genocidal tale … It manifested the
British imperialist Establishment’s ‘secret’ intention to find a
respectable ‘scientific’ theory to justify causing global wars (and
two world wars did follow… in obscene frequency) for ‘the survival
of the fittest’ " Favoured Race" to emerge as a ‘naturally selected’
ruler of the world …

Professor Pilikian’s contention was that the Industrial economic
Revolution created in Britain was evolving (in a Darwinist manner)
into the 19th c British imperialism, with voracious appetites for
global markets – very much the case, he felt, of present so-said
Globalization. Britain let rip the First World War led by Queen
Victoria’s grandson, the German Kaiser who considered himself to be
the better … British! And the trigger for this murderous Darwinian
"laboratory"exercise was the genocide of the Armenians in 1915!

Siegfried Sassoon, an Establishment figure (like Darwin), but an active
war-poet, had "almost" worked this secret out, when he had accused
the British government of deliberately prolonging the first world
war for imperialist greed. As a punishment, the British Establishment
disgraced Sassoon labelling him as mentally ill.

Professor Pilikian concluded his historical analyses with an astounding
conclusion; that these ideas were not in the past, but in fact very
active today in Anglo-American global politics. He referred to British
Prime Minister, Tony Blair’s recent much-trumpeted speech advocating
global warmongering. Mr Blair had successfully destroyed all the
distinctive Socialist traditions of the Labour Party, except one –
its Pacifism. The Prime Minister now wanted to ensure that before
he resigned, he "could genocide" that last Socialist survivor of
Old Labour…

The stunned silence of the distinguished audience was broken by the
woman MP Nia Griffith, fixing Professor Pilikian with a warm stare and
thanking him for all she had learnt today. Turning to the guests, she
added that the stream of information passing through an MP’s office
is unimaginable, and that the process of learning is slow but worth
it, when it is properly organized by constituents as effectively
as today. Ms Griffith herself had put down a Parliamentary Motion
recording Hrant Dink as a campaigner for the Recognition of the
Genocide of the Armenians by Britain.

Among the guests were Lord Rea (with Lord Avebury) very well-known
for his defence of Human Rights issues in the House of Lords;
Dr. Fariudin Hilmi, ex Cabinet Minister of the first government of
Kurdistan in Iraq, who was invited by the Chair Eilian Thomas to pay
his own personal tribute; Paddy Tipping, MP, member of the All-Party
Parliamentary Group on Armenia; David Howard, Liberal Democrat MP;
Martin Short, famous author and documentary film-maker (Inside the
Brotherhood on modern Freemasonry, Crime Inc. on the US Mafia etc.);
Manvel Atamian, an award-winning Armenian poet and Editor of The Voice
of Nor Seroont, the sole London-Armenian bilingual (Armenian/English)
weekly; Vaughan Pilikian, award-winning film-maker, Sanskrittist
Editor and Translator of Clay Sanskrit Library (of a Hundred Volumes)
; Artour Oshakantsi – the renowned Painter from Armenia, regarded as
the Founder of ‘Abstract Naturalism’; Ms Estella Schmid, an excellent
orator, the very well-known London activist and the long-battling
fighter for Kurdish Rights ; the distinguished Turkish human Rights
journalists Koray Duzgoran, his wife Arman, and Mustafa Yasacan,
who paid tribute in the name of progressive Turkish journalists,
and spoke movingly of his personal prediction of the murder a whole
year before it happened …

The guests parted company on an intellectual high … while
congratulating Professor Hovhanness I. Pilikian for his radical
insight into the genocidal politics of the British Empire framing
the genocide of the Armenians as the first of its kind, urged him to
write down his speech, and dispatch copies by e-mail … for further
circulation on the world-wide Net.

ANKARA: New Governor And Police Chief To Be Appointed To Trabzon

NEW GOVERNOR AND POLICE CHIEF TO BE APPOINTED TO TRABZON

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Feb 13 2007

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoðan said a new governor and a
police chief will soon be appointed to Trabzon, a city of the Black
Sea coast where the governor and the police chief were suspended as
part of an investigation into the Jan. 19 killing of ethnic Armenian
journalist Hrant Dink.

"We will present the new appointees to the President for approval. We
have about 10 cities waiting for new governors. Trabzon will be
appointed its new governor and police chief as well," Erdoðan said.

Addressing a crowd in Trabzon, Erdoðan thanked the public for remaining
calm in the face of recent developments. "You gave the most appropriate
response to those who might have malicious plans. Trabzon will be
among the best examples of cities that demonstrate common sense,
peace and unity," Erdoðan said.

Eight suspects from Trabzon, including the alleged teenage triggerman,
are under arrest in relation the killing of Dink in Istanbul. The
slaying prompted international condemnation as well as a debate
within Turkey about freedom speech, and whether state institutions
were tolerant of militant nationalists.

Erdoðan also referred to the problems facing youth saying that they
should be shielded from provocations. "The youth in Trabzon will have
the same opportunities as the youth in Ýstanbul," Erdoðan added. Like
many mid-size Turkish cities, Trabzon contains the ingredients that
cause social discontent. Unemployment is high, the quality of education
is poor, and facilities are few.

–Boundary_(ID_zhBoxkoVAXuKQncfyqMxWw)–

Reports On Defense Technology Accumulation In Jebrail – Baku’s Regul

REPORTS ON DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ACCUMULATION IN JEBRAIL – BAKU’S REGULAR CANARD

PanARMENIAN.Net
12.02.2007 15:53 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The reports of the Azeri media on accumulation of
Armenian defense technology in Jebrail region do not correspond
to reality, said NKR Defense Ministry PR officer, lieutenant
colonel Senor Asratyan. "This information is absolutely false,"
he underscored. Meanwhile Azeri media spread information that "the
Armenian armed forces amass military equipment in the direction of
Laletepe, Jebrail region. Residents of the villages situated near
the frontline say "military equipment is brought to the territory at
night and Armenians fire upon our positions."

Following The Track Of Murders Of Armenians In Russia

FOLLOWING THE TRACK OF MURDERS OF ARMENIANS IN RUSSIA
Anna Nazaryan

"Radiolur"
12.02.2007 16:25

Murder of the 15-year-old Armenian schoolboy Arthur Martirosyan still
remains undisclosed.

Moreover, there are no culprits or suspects.

"President of the "Lex" lawyer agency of Moscow, attorney Simon
Tsaturyan told Radiolur that operative works are currently under way.

The trial of another recently disclosed recently case will start
soon. The matter concerns the detainment of four members of the
skinhead group accused of murdering Narek Kocharyan on November 11,
2006. According to the attorney, the latter have been presented the
charge of "murder on the ground of nationalism."

"Soon the case of murder of Arthur Sahakyan in the electric train
will be brought to court," added Simon Tsaturyan.

The case of Vigen Abrahamyan killed at Pushkinskaya metro station is
more complex one. Despite the fact that the criminal group has been
arrested and the leader of the group – 18-year-old Nikita Senyukov
is known, several other crimes connected with him make the work
difficult. Let us remind, that he is accused of organizing the blast
at Cherkizovskaya market.

Police Briefly Detain 2 Men Suspected Of Planning To Hijack Istanbul

POLICE BRIEFLY DETAIN 2 MEN SUSPECTED OF PLANNING TO HIJACK ISTANBUL FERRY

International Herald Tribune, France
Feb 10 2007

ANKARA, Turkey: Police detained two men Saturday on suspicions that
they were planning to hold up an Istanbul ferry to protest the fact
that pro-Armenian slogans had been chanted at a slain journalist’s
funeral, police said Saturday.

An Istanbul court ordered the two men released after questioning,
saying there was not enough evidence to charge them.

Acting on a tip, police detained the two men at the city’s entrance
Saturday, a police official said. He spoke on condition of anonymity
because of rules that bar civil servants from speaking to reporters
without prior authorization.

Police said the two men – from the eastern city of Igdir, near the
borders with Iran and Armenia – allegedly planned to hijack a ferry
sailing between the Asian and European shores of the Bosporous, copying
a ferry hijacking last month in the Dardanelles strait, police said.

That hijacker had threatened to blow the ferry up in protesting the
pro-American slogans. He had been carrying a gun, but no explosives,
and after about 2 1/2 hours surrendered to police. No passengers
were harmed.

As the two men detained Saturday left the courthouse, they shouted:
"Turks have no other friends but Turks!" the state-run Anatolia news
agency reported.

Ethnic Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, who spoke out about the mass
killings of Armenians in the early 20th century, was gunned down
outside his newspaper in Istanbul on Jan. 19.

Dink had been brought to trial numerous times for allegedly "insulting
Turkishness," a crime under an article in the country’s penal code.

His funeral inspired a massive outpouring of support for reconciliation
between Armenians and Turks, with thousands chanting "We’re all
Armenians." Nationalists however, were angered by the pro-Armenian
slogans.

Report on mission to Istanbul to rep. EP at funeral of Hrant Dink

AB Haber, Belgium
EU-Turkey News Network
Feb 9 2007

Report on the mission to Istanbul of 18 to 19 January 2007 to
represent the European Parliament at the Funeral Mass for the
Armenian journalist Hrant Dink

Rapporteur: Joost Lagendijk

Hrant Dink, publisher and editor-in-chief of the Turkish-Armenian
weekly newspaper Agos, published in Istanbul, was shot in front of
his newspaper’s offices on Friday, 19 January 2007. He died at the
scene from three gunshot wounds to the head. The news spread across
the world within minutes and there was a great sense of outrage
within Turkey and in Europe as a whole. The murderer was a
17-year-old youth from ultra-nationalist circles in the city of
Trabzon. Although those who gave the assassination order have since
been arrested, many questions surrounding this crime remain
unanswered. As well as covering the Mass and visits to the family and
to the editorial staff of the Agos newspaper, this report examines
the background to the crime as well as the significance of Hrant
Dink’s work in the context of efforts to improve relations between
Armenia and Turkey. Let us begin, however, with a brief biography of
Hrant Dink:

Hrant Dink

Hrant Dink was born into an Armenian family from the town of Malayta
in eastern Turkey. The Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople, Mesrob
II, described his development and personality in the following words:

‘His life of struggle and hardship made Hrant Dink a courageous,
sensitive and resolute person. These qualities enabled him to become
an advocate and a symbol of justice, freedom of belief and human
rights. He stood up for his opinions and his ideas without fear of
possible consequences. He was equally resolute in taking action when
he was convinced that action was needed.

Hrant had the same affinity with his native country as he had with
his ethnic roots. He loved his birthplace, his country and its people
without rejecting the values of his origins. His courage reflected
his Anatolian attitude to people – full of love, making no
distinction on the basis of religion, race or origin. In this, Hrant
followed God’s commandment.’

With these words, Patriarch Mesrob II expressed the joy he felt when,
calling on Mrs Dink to express his condolences, he learned that Hrant
believed in Jesus and honoured him as the Saviour. The fact that the
Patriarch did not discover until after Hrant Dink’s death that this
prominent member of his small community had been a Christian believer
says a great deal about Hrant’s work in Turkey. With his liberal
left-wing convictions, he was not only on the side of the opposition
in national politics but he also belonged to the opposition within
the small Armenian community, which is dominated by the Armenian
Apostolic Church. He had been especially critical of the leaders of
the community for not being vociferous enough in condemning the
numerous instances of discrimination against minorities in general
and against the Armenian community in particular. Nevertheless, or
perhaps precisely because of that criticism and that courage, he was
extremely popular within his community.

Hrant Dink, whose journalism was honoured with numerous awards, had
also established a firm place within Turkish society. Agos, the
newspaper he published – which, unlike other Armenian newspapers,
also appears in Turkish – was held in high regard by its Turkish
readers too. His foremost concerns were Turkish-Armenian dialogue and
rapprochement, and the promotion of relations between Turkey and
Armenia.

Hrant firmly believed that the past can only be addressed and
understood where there are prospects of future relations. Armenia’s
painful history exercised his mind no less than the Armenian
Diaspora. But he took a different, and perhaps more effective,
approach to the debate on the Armenian genocide of 1915 than is
customary in Turkey. In his speeches and writings, he tried to avoid
the term ‘genocide’. He informed his readers and listeners,
describing the events of 1915, but left the definition to them and
invited them to find the appropriate term.

Hrant was also loved by his Turkish friends because, like many other
critical journalists in that country, he was persecuted on account of
his work. He was the subject of several criminal trials. He was
sentenced to six months in prison under Article 301 of the Criminal
Code for ‘denigration of Turkishness’. His last newspaper article
contained a very tactful analysis of the reasons why charges against
‘Turkish’ writers such as Orhan Pamuk and Elif Þafak had been dropped
whereas he had been convicted. He could rebel like nobody else
against exclusion and injustice without bowing to anyone or indeed
taking pleasure in his resistance. His conviction hurt him not only
because he considered it unjust but also because he felt it as an
affront to his deeply held anti-racist convictions. This made him a
unique journalist in Turkey, a much-loved and respected figure. His
death is undoubtedly a great loss to Turkey and to the Armenian
community around the world.

The funeral – a political event

The funeral of Hrant Dink turned into one of the largest ever mass
demonstrations in the city of Istanbul. Although it was expected that
thousands would come to pay their last respects to Hrant Dink, not
even the greatest of optimists could have foreseen the vast sea of
more than a hundred thousand people. At 10 a.m. on Tuesday, 23
January, when we[1] arrived in the boulevard in front of the Agos
offices, thousands of people had already gathered for the
demonstration, which was due to begin in one hour’s time. As we
waited for the start of the demonstration, which began with a speech
from Hrant Dink’s widow in the form of a letter, entitled Sevgilim
(‘My Beloved’),[2] floods of people poured into the street in front
of the Agos offices from all parts of the city. Mrs Dink’s speech, a
declaration of love, not only moved the listening crowds to profound
grief but also contained an appeal to refrain from the chanting of
slogans and to accompany Hrant in silence on his final journey. This
wish was respected. It was not easy to take in this mass of
participants, young and old, who seemed to come from all strata of
society. It was as if we were in the midst of a sea and could only
make out waves of people. It was impossible to see where the crowds
began or ended.

After a few kilometres the family and guests left the demonstration
to attend the Funeral Mass in the Church of the Virgin Mary. This was
not easy either. The guests’ path was blocked not only by the
traffic, which had been brought to a standstill by the demonstration,
but also by the sheer mass of people around the church. All the
streets around the Church of the Virgin Mary, the seat of the
Patriarch, were jammed with masses of people. The ambassadors of many
countries, including the United States, the Netherlands and Germany,
had travelled up from Ankara, and the Turkish Government was also
represented by two ministers. The press, representatives of
employers’ organisations, trade unions and political parties, the
Mayor of the City of Istanbul and representatives of the Armenian
community throughout the world were gathered in the church.

In his remarks during the Mass, the Patriarch was very restrained. He
neither attempted to assess the political motives for the murder nor
apportioned blame to the security forces for failing to protect Hrant
Dink, nor did he even comment on speculation and accusations
concerning these matters. Two important demands did, however, emerge
clearly: the Patriarch asked the Turkish Government to grant full
freedom of expression and to ensure that people would no longer be
charged or convicted, let alone murdered, for expressing their
opinion. The second demand related to discrimination against the
Armenian community in Turkey. The Patriarch called for recognition
that ‘the Armenians are Turkish nationals who have lived for
thousands of years in this country, and they must no longer be
perceived as a foreign body or a threat’. The removal of this
prejudice, he said, should begin with the revision of school
textbooks.

The liturgy was accompanied and concluded by Gregorian chant and
hymns. The congregation rejoined the demonstrators at the cemetery.

The family and the editorial staff of Agos

On 22 January, shortly after our arrival, we had visited the family
to express our condolences and convey the condolences of the
President of the European Parliament. The small modest flat in the
Bakýrköy district of Istanbul was crammed with family and friends of
Hrant Dink. Representatives of political parties were in the room.
The youngest daughter was with her mother. Mrs Dink was outwardly
composed, but her grief was evident. The constant flow of callers was
surely stressful, but at the same time it helped to ease the family’s
pain. As we were leaving the flat, the Minister for the Interior
arrived. Two days later, it was reported in the press that the Prime
Minister had paid a call. Mr Erdogan spent more than an hour with the
family. Some press reports seem to indicate that his visit was more
than just a courtesy call.

Thanks to the bookshop that Hrant Dink established in the Bakýrköy
district, the family’s economic circumstances seem to be stable.
Before his murder, he was building a new house to reduce the burden
of a high rent for the bookshop. Nevertheless, it will not be easy
for the family to continue Hrant Dink’s work and maintain his
personal network. His children are still too young to contribute, not
having yet completed their education.

The family will also have to bear his political legacy, a task made
even more onerous by his murder. There is a need not only to maintain
the Agos newspaper, which was partly funded from Hrant Dink’s own
pocket, but also to channel many initiatives designed to keep Hrant
Dink’s ideas alive through the creation of foundations and other
cultural and political activities, and these things are not easy to
organise.

The twenty or so people who work for Agos, his political and cultural
platform, showed through the organisation of the demonstration that
they will continue to run the newspaper successfully. Dink’s closest
friend, the journalist Etyen Mahçupyan, will take over as
editor-in-chief in the meantime and will assist the family, who will
be publishing Agos. The financial situation, though not particularly
stable, seems to be sound enough for the newspaper to cover its
costs. It would be a great loss for Turkey if Agos were to die with
Hrant Dink. We visited the newspaper offices twice and assured the
editorial team of our support.

The murderers and freedom of expression in Turkey

The murderer, a 17-year-old youth, was arrested fairly quickly, two
days after the crime. The murder of an Italian priest a year before,
which was also committed by a youth, aged 16, not only put the city
in the spotlight but also alerted the press to the fact that
fanaticised minors were being used for political assassinations. So
far seven men from ultra-nationalist circles who are believed to have
been behind the crime have been arrested, and they are currently
being questioned. They too are young people in their mid-twenties.
Two theories are being discussed in the Turkish press.

It is being suggested that those who give the orders are using the
same methods as the organisers of suicide bombings and deliberately
choosing minors to carry out their crimes. Fanaticised by
nationalists and fundamentalists, these young people are sent to
assassinate critical journalists, writers and politicians. After his
arrest, one of the young people also made death threats against the
writer Orhan Pamuk, last year’s winner of the Nobel Prize for
Literature, who was likewise charged with a breach of Article 301 of
the Criminal Code. The theory has been advanced that the men behind
these crimes are active members of political parties and also
maintain links with elements of the security forces.

The second theory is that the killers are gangs of youths who have
been fanaticised through the Internet. Initial indications suggest
that these youths are linked in a Web network and communicate with
other ultra-nationalist circles. This scenario would make the
situation even more dangerous since it may be supposed that there are
hundreds of these youth gangs throughout Turkey.

Whichever is the true scenario, it spells danger for all critical
journalists, writers and politicians who have been charged or
convicted under Article 301. Almost all of the journalists and
writers who have been charged under Article 301 are given police
protection – and rightly so, for the last article by Hrant Dink,[3]
which was published in two parts in Agos on 12 and 19 January,
reveals how that provision has been putting journalists’ lives at
risk.

In his article, Hrant bemoans the fact that, in spite of the expert
reports obtained by the court and contrary to the statement made by
the public prosecutor, his accusers secured his conviction, and he
was sentenced to six months in prison. This judgment, he said, hurt
him, because it meant that he had been wrongly convicted of
‘denigrating Turkishness’. He went on to describe how the trial had
made him a target for ultra-nationalist factions. This frequent
pattern in cases involving Article 301 is an important factor in the
present debate, and for this reason we shall briefly focus on it.

On 6 February 2004, Hrant had stated in a newspaper article that
Sabiha Gökçen, the adopted daughter of Kemal Atatürk, had been of
Armenian descent and that Atatürk had adopted her from an orphanage.
As evidence, he accompanied the article with excerpts from his own
conversations with members of Sabiha Gökçen’s family. A report on
this article made front-page headlines in one of the major national
newspapers on 21 February 2004, triggering both a chorus of praise
and a hail of condemnation. The fiercest criticism came from the
general staff of the armed forces, who called Hrant’s article a
criminal act. As a result, he was called to the office of the
provincial governor and given a formal warning. Hrant Dink tried to
point out that for him, as a journalist, discovering that Kemal
Atatürk’s adopted daughter was an Armenian girl was a big news story.
For that reason, ‘instead of only discussing the Armenian question
through the dead’, he had sought to discuss it ‘through living people
and survivors too’. Hrant Dink concluded that it was even more
difficult to involve survivors in the discussion.

In the days that followed, Agos became the target of
ultra-nationalist demonstrations. Hrant Dink’s speeches and writings
were scrutinised. The Turkish "Great Lawyers’ Association", another
ultra-nationalist body, initiated proceedings against him on the
basis of a sentence taken out of context from an article that had
appeared in Agos on 13 February 2004. The public prosecutor
instituted proceedings under Article 301 of the Criminal Code.
Contrary to all judicial logic, Hrant Dink was found guilty at every
stage of the proceedings.

The succession of trials and appeals and the fact that he had to
resort to the European Court of Human Rights weighed heavily on Hrant
Dink. He felt persecuted and even threatened. He told his friends
that he was afraid. His final article conveys a vivid impression of
how he must have felt during the last months of his life.

Hrant Dink’s death has brought two important issues into the public
spotlight in Turkey, namely the threat to freedom of expression and
the Armenian question. The outpouring of sympathy and the throngs of
people who paid their last respects to Hrant Dink mean that we must
ensure that these two issues are high on our agenda in the coming
months and years.

_____

[1] Hélène Flautre, chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights, also
travelled to Istanbul for the funeral.

[2] See annex.

[3] See annex, ‘The "pigeon skittishness" of my soul’ – Agos, 12 and
19 January 2007.

Nancy Pelosi Rejected Request For Meeting With Gul

NANCY PELOSI REJECTED REQUEST FOR MEETING WITH GUL

PanARMENIAN.Net
08.02.2007 16:21 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ With Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul in the US capital
Washington, DC for official visits, it has been a noticeable gap in
his schedule that he has not been able to meet with the new Speaker
of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi. The Turkish Hurriyet
reports that Pelosi, who has voiced her support for the same Armenian
Genocide bill on which Gul is trying to work against, rejected a
request from the Turkish Foreign Ministry for a meeting with Gul,
with claims that her schedule during Gul’s visit to the U.S. capital
would be too busy to fit him in. The Turkish foreign minister tries
to prevent the adoption of the bill during his official meetings with
the George Bush administration representatives.

Pre-Electoral Situation In Armenian Cannot Somehow Hold Up Talks Ove

PRE-ELECTORAL SITUATION IN ARMENIAN CANNOT SOMEHOW HOLD UP TALKS OVER KARABAKH

PanARMENIAN.Net
08.02.2007 17:33 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "My statement on continuing the talks over the
Nagorno Karabakh conflict solution after the parliamentary elections
in Armenia proceeded from taking into account the real situation in
Armenia," stated OSCE PA Chairman Goran Lennmarker to the journalists
before his meeting with Azeri foreign minister. He said he is in favor
of intensive continuation of negotiation process over the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict solution. G. Lennmarker also gives importance to
pre-electoral situation in Armenia and does not think that it can
somehow hold up the talks.

Baltic States Share Military Reform Experience With Armenia

BALTIC STATES SHARE MILITARY REFORM EXPERIENCE WITH ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
07.02.2007 18:19 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Strengthening of civil control over the army is
one of the fundamental stages of the armed forces’ reformation, Dr
Horst Schmalfeld, the deputy director of the George C. Marshall Fund,
said in Yerevan. In his words, during the "Military reform in Armenia:
providing of Defense Ministry with civil personnel and introduction
of amendments in the law On Defense" seminar recommendations that
include openness of armed forces for the civil control and expanded
ties with media were submitted. "We have already achieved progress
in this direction. The Baltic states willingly share experience with
Armenia," said Dr Schmalfeld.

Armenian Youth Writing Competition Winners Announced

PRESS RELEASE
St. Peter Armenian Church & Youth Ministries~R Center
632 W. Stocker St.
Glendale, CA 91202
Contact: Fr. Vazken Movsesian
Tel: 818.244.9696
FAX: 818.244.8090
EMAIL: [email protected]
Web:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE –

Youth Ministries’ Writing Competition Gives Armenian Youth a Voice

The Armenian Church Youth Ministries’ is pleased to announce the winners for
its First Annual Writing Contest. This year’s theme was "The Life of My
Armenian Family during the Genocide." An Apple Macbook® and iPod® are among
the prizes which will be awarded to winners on Sunday, February 11, 2007 at
the St. Peter Youth Ministries’ Center in Glendale.

Entries were received over the course of several months. Ari Jon Filian, 16,
of Pasadena, California, was selected for the first place award for his
touching and powerful short story "Families Not Forgotten".  Filian writes,
"Remember, my fellow Armenians. . . God’s gift to us is our identity, our
heritage. When everything else is taken from us there is God and there is
our heritage. Never forget your people, never forget Armenia!"

Other top winners include Talar Kikilian (14) and Tamar Barsoumian (15) for
their stirring stories of a generation coming to terms with a bloody past.
These stories and others are available for reading at  

The competition is sponsored by the Youth Ministries and funded through a
grant by the Jerry & Mariam Manoukian family of Los Altos, California. The
purpose of the competition is to stimulate and encourage young Armenian
voices in the community. Dr. Mariam Manoukian and Elize Manoukian,
co-authors of "The Other Side of Ararat" (Abril Books, 2005) will be on hand
to make the award presentations.

The public is invited to attend and encourage this new group of writers,
Sunday, February 11, St. Peter Armenian Church & Youth Ministries’ Center,
632 W. Stocker St., Glendale, CA beginning at 10:30AM. Mission director, Fr.
Vazken Movsesian will be addressing the winners and congregation at 11:30. A
light lunch follows the services where prizes will be award.

For further information and to read the winning entries please visit
inhisshoes.org or hyeyouth.com

–Boundary_(ID_okLfvC8nq4ssVaJp5YKvx w)–

http://www.inhisshoes.com/
www.hyeyouth.com.