ANKARA: Armenian MP: Armenia And Turkey Interests Don’t Coincide

ARMENIAN MP: ARMENIA AND TURKEY INTERESTS DON’T COINCIDE
By Melek Tuzluca

Journal of Turkish Weekly
May 22 2008
Turkey

Armen Ashotuan, Armenia MP and member of the ruling Republican Party
of Armenia thinks that the true and announced interests of Turkey
and Armenia do not coincide, Pan-Armenian reports.

Mr. Ashotuan said "If the interests, which are just declared, can be
compared, so the true interests clash only. Ashotyan gave a lecture
in "Global Challenges and Threats: Are Joint Efforts between Armenia
and Turkey Possible?" international conference in Yerevan.

"If Armenia needs Turkey as a steadily developing neighbor,
Turkey needs Armenia at the instigation of world powers and major
international organizations," the MP Ashotuan added.

"Armenia’s global and regional interests focus international
recognition of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic, open communication and
recognition of the Armenian Genocide. Turkey is aspired to join the
EU and maintain Turkish unity," he noted.

* ‘Turkey-Armenian Co-operation is not a Dream’

Turkish scholars however do not share Armenian MP Ashotuan’s
pessimism. Dr. Sedat Laciner, head of the USAK, told the JTW that
Turkey and Armenia can develop good relations and closer ties are
good for both countries:

"Armenia is a tiny country with limited natural sources, small economy
and limited population. It has no sea way. Under these curcumstances,
Yerevan should solve its problems with the neighbours to survive and
to be really an independent country. Turkey is the best (if not the
only one) way to reach the West. Similarly Turkey needs Armenia for
better transportation ways to Central Asia’s Turkic republics. Also
Armenians are very part of Turkish identity and past."

Armenia does not recognise Turkey’s national borders and claims the
eastern part of Anatolia is ‘Western Armenia’. About 20 percent of
Azerbaijain has been under Armenian occupation.

Request To Doctors

REQUEST TO DOCTORS

Panorama.am
17:04 22/05/2008

"The Chairman of the "New Times" Political Party Aram Karapetyan’s
health was damaged in the isolation ward of investigative
administration of the "Yerevan-Kentron" because of bad conditions.

We ask all cardiologist doctors of the world to read the medical
diagnosis below concerning Chairman of the "New Times" Political Party
Aram Karapetyan and send their suggestions and advices concerning
medical treatment to our e-mail address.

We also ask to answer if it is possible to make treatment of the
patient in isolation ward.

The consilium for the patient Aram Karapetyan was organized in
21.05.08 at the cardiopulmonary department of Erebouni Medical Centre
with participation of H.E.Saiyan (deputy head doctor), L.Ye.Atayan
(head of the cardiopulmonary department), H.G.Hayrapetyan (head
of the department of myocardial infarction), A.A.Mamikonyan (chief
endocrinologist), A.R.Nazaryan (invasive cardiologist of Nork-Marash
Medical Centre), professor R.S.Gabrielyan, associate professor
A.Y.Gasparyan, doctor A.E.Margaryan.

The following conclusions were made:

Chief endocrinologist A.A.Mamikonyan: Mild diabetes mellitus, type 2

Invasive cardiologist of Nork-Marash Medical Centre A.R.Nazaryan:
Acute coronary syndrome, arterial hypertension, II stage

Prof. R.S.Gabrielyan, Cardiology Institute Ischaemic heart disease,
progressive unstable angina, heart failure, impairment of blood
circulation, I functional class, arterial hypertension, I stage

Assoc. Prof. Armen Gasparyan: Ischaemic heart disease, progressive
angina, impairment of blood circulation, I functional class, arterial
hypertension, II stage, course with crises

The diagnosis of cardiopulmonary department of Erebouni Medical
Centre: Ischaemic heart disease, stable angina, functional class
III-IV, impairment of blood circulation, I functional class, arterial
hypertension, II stage, hypertonic crisis (16.05.08).

We shall be much appreciated for all necessary suggestions and advices.

Special thanks beforehand".

Press Department of the "Hew Times" Political Party

Public Lavatories To Be Installed At Filling Stations

PUBLIC LAVATORIES TO BE INSTALLED AT FILLING STATIONS

Noyan Tapan

Ma y 22, 2008

YEREVAN, MAY 22, NOYAN TAPAN. By the Armenian government’s decision,
public lavatories have to be installed at filling stations of
the country. The RA minister of economy Nerses Yeritsian said at
the May 22 sitting of the government that the owners of filling
stations will spend about 10 thousand dollars on installation of
each lavatory. Some environmental problems will also be solved in
this way. Public lavatories have to be installed at Yerevan’s filling
stations within a year, in marzes – with three months.

The government decisions also envisage changing some rules of trade.

According to N. Yeritsian, weight checkers have to be installed at
all trade points, including in fairs. Besides, bread sold at trade
facilities shall have a label with its price and weight.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=113666

Ariel Cohen: Turkey Is U.S. Vital Ally In Region Wrought With Danger

ARIEL COHEN: TURKEY IS U.S. VITAL ALLY IN REGION WROUGHT WITH DANGER

PanARMENIAN.Net
20.05.2008 16:06 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Later this year, the Turkish Constitutional Court
will hear a petition aiming to ban from politics the ruling Justice
and Development Party (AKP) and many of its most prominent members,
including Turkey’s prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, its president,
Abdullah Gul, and several dozen more AKP politicians. Since its
establishment in 1962, the Court has heard no fewer than four other
petitions to prohibit political parties. It has granted all of them.

"The trigger for the latest petition, filed by Abdurrahman Yalcinkaya,
the Turkish state prosecutor, was the AKP’s push to allow the wearing
of the hijab (head cover) in Turkish universities. The hijab row has
caused deep concern among the secular, mostly nationalist elite and
state bureaucracy, who believe that the AKP is instigating a creeping
"Islamization" of the Turkish Republic. Most Turks do not want to
live under sharia law and do not want their country to become another
Iran. The extremist wing of the AKP, along with 7 to 8 percent of
the Turkish population, probably does," said Ariel Cohen, a senior
research fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

"However, banning the party would provoke a massive controversy. First,
there is the issue of popular legitimacy. The AKP won 47 percent
of the vote in the last parliamentary elections, giving it a broad
popular mandate. It may be easy to ban a small, radical party, but it
is very difficult to ban a ruling party with a second-term cabinet,
a popular prime minister, and a newly elected president.

"Second, a judiciary crackdown will undoubtedly prompt AKP supporters
to howl about the "persecution of Muslims," creating a powerful
mobilizing factor for the next elections.

"Third, there is the issue of southeast Turkey. In this region, the
AKP is splitting the vote with the Kurdish DTP party, which has ties to
the PKK terrorist group. Banning the AKP would help the DTP to perform
well in the 2008 municipal elections, scheduled for this coming fall.

"The Turkish state prosecutor would have a stronger case against the
AKP if clear evidence of a conspiracy existed, such as documents
outlining a coup plan, tape recordings of a plot to overthrow the
secular republic, or blatantly subversive links to foreign regimes or
terrorist organizations. Instead, the AKP has an amorphous agenda:
parts of its platform smack of Islamization, but the Court lacks a
clear evidentiary base to banish it from politics.

"The international repercussions of this case are enormous. The
vast majority of elite Turks want their country to join the European
Union. The AKP has done much to promote Turkey’s accession, despite
resistance from many European quarters. The EU and European governments
have clearly indicated that if the Court bans the AKP, it will set
back Turkish EU membership for years, if not indefinitely.

"At the same time, preserving the republic and repulsing threats both
external and internal is the top priority for Turkey’s state guardians:
lawyers, judges, military officers, and security commanders.

They will ignore foreign protests if they feel their country is
in peril.

"In deciding the AKP case, the Constitutional Court should use a
laser scalpel, not a sledgehammer. It could place a sanction on the
AKP and block its efforts at Islamization, yet not ban the party and
not destroy the democratic foundations of the Turkish state. The
Court could bar a handful of the most notorious AKP politicians,
but not the popular Erdogan and Gul. It could deny the AKP state
funds for implementation of its Islamization agenda. It could warn
the cabinet not to ignore the country’s secular spirit and legacy.

"Turkey is a vital ally of the United States in a region wrought with
danger. Washington is well advised to stay out of Turkey’s existential
crisis and let the Court settle it the best way it can. Americans
should respect Turkey’s maturity and independence. But Washington
should also emphasize its desire to maintain robust bilateral
relations," Mr Cohen said, The American reports.

Zvartnots Airport Services More Than 372 Thousand Passengers In Firs

ZVARTNOTS AIRPORT SERVICES MORE THAN 372 THOUSAND PASSENGERS IN FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF 2008

Noyan Tapan

Ma y 20, 2008

YEREVAN, MAY 20, NOYAN TAPAN. Zvartnots International Airport serviced
372,179 passengers in the first 4 months of 2008, which is more by
41,861 passengers than in the same period of 2007. In the indicated
period, 218,233 passengers departed from Zvartnots, and 153,946 ones
arrived – as compared with 186,913 and 143,405 passengers respectively
in January-April 2007.

NT correspondent was informed by spokeswoman for the Main Department
of the RA Civil Aviation Gayane Davtian that cargo transportation
made 2,709 tons in January-April 2008, growing by 82 tons on the same
months of 2007.

The number of take off-landings at Zvartnots Airport made 2,566 in
the indicated period, increasing by 316 on the same period of 2007.

Shirak Airport of Gyumri services 6,319 passengers, while cargo
transportation made 2 tons in January-April 2008, which is fewer
by 5,267 passengers and less by 2.7 tons as compared with the same
period of 2007.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=113576

Travels In The Former Soviet Union

TRAVELS IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION
By Joshua Kucera

Washingtonpost
1588/
May 20, 2008, at 1:27 PM ET

TSKHINVALI, South Ossetia–The first time I enter Tskhinvali,
the capital of South Ossetia, the hotel staff immediately calls
the police. They tell me that no one can process my journalist
accreditation until Wednesday. It is a Sunday afternoon, and the
following Tuesday is the May Day holiday, making it a four-day
weekend. Can’t I just stay until then and see the town as a tourist,
I ask? Nope. So about 20 minutes after I arrive, the police drive
me back to the border with Georgia proper and tell me to try again
later. I come back on Wednesday and find that the accreditation process
consists of writing my name in a book and filling out a small piece
of paper that I am told to carry with me everywhere I go. It takes
about a minute.

I’m visiting South Ossetia as part of a tour across the southern edge
of the former Soviet Union, looking at the wildly different directions
the newly independent countries have taken since 1991. In the case
of South Ossetia, a self-proclaimed independent country that is,
in fact, neither independent nor a country, "nowhere" is probably
the best way to describe where it’s gone. It’s perhaps the closest
you can get today to experiencing the old Soviet Union, as well as a
good place to get the flavor of a good old-fashioned, Cold-War-style
proxy war between the United States and Russia. South Ossetia broke
away from Georgia after a chaotic 18-month war that killed 1,000 (of
a population of 60,000) between 1990 and 1992. Today, South Ossetia
is propped up by Russia: Moscow pays government salaries and provides
the bulk of the peacekeeping forces. Billboards around Tskhinvali
show Vladimir Putin with the legend "Our President." (This is during
the summer of 2007. The billboards were later replaced with signs
featuring new President Dmitry Medvedev that read, "The Russian Bear
Is the Friend of the Snow Leopard," leopards being a symbol of the
Ossetian nation.) Meanwhile, in Georgia proper, the United States is
conducting an extensive training program for the Georgian military.

Of course, Washington has bigger fish to fry than South Ossetia–it’s
training the Georgians to serve in Iraq, where the tiny ex-Soviet
country is the highest per-capita contributor of troops, with about
2,000 in the sandbox.

When I finally make it to Tskhinvali, I meet with the head of the
press office, Irina Gagloeva, and she asks me whom I want to talk to.

I give her the list of government officials I’d like to interview.

The president? He’s in Moscow. The prime minister? Likewise. The
minister of defense or the chief of the armed forces? Absolutely
impossible to talk to anyone about anything military, she says.

Finally, we set up meetings with the foreign minister and the deputy
prime minister. That shouldn’t take very long, she says, so you
can leave tomorrow. I tell her I also want time to talk to people
outside the government–journalists, academics, ordinary people–and
to get the flavor of South Ossetia. I was hoping to stay until Sunday,
a four-day trip. No, she says. Finally, she relents and lets me stay
until Saturday. "Saturday, 5 p.m., Joshua goodbye." She also forbids me
to visit Kurta, where a rival government advocating reintegration with
Georgia established itself last year. It’s clear that the government
does not want journalists roaming around South Ossetia.

That afternoon, I set out to walk around town and take some photos.

My first subject is a small group of palm trees that were given to
the government of South Ossetia by Abkhazia, its sister breakaway
territory. A policeman, who looks about 16, comes over and asks for
my passport and accreditation. Everything checks out, and he lets
me go. But a few minutes later, I see a picturesque abandoned shop
with two flags flying out front–South Ossetian and Russian. The
South Ossetian flag is almost never seen here without a Russian flag
alongside. I snap a picture, and another policeman comes up and asks
to see the last photo I took. I figure he thinks I had taken one of
a policeman or some other forbidden subject, so I confidently show
him the photo of the shop. "Come with me," he says, and we get in
his Lada Niva jeep and drive to the nearby police station. "Is there
a problem with the photo?" I ask. "Yes, there’s a problem." At the
police station, I wait on a ratty couch for about an hour, until
two officials from the foreign ministry arrive. They drive me back
to the hotel and tell me to stay there until morning. But I haven’t
eaten dinner, and there is no restaurant in the hotel, I protest. One
relents and says I can go out to eat. But nothing more, and I must
be back at the hotel by 9:30. They tell the receptionist to call the
police if I’m not back. What’s the problem? I ask again. "People might
think you’re a spy," one of them tells me. This is all for my safety,
he explains. What sort of dangers are out there in Tskhinvali? I
ask. "Maybe Georgians would attack you and blame us," he says. I
never find out why they were freaked out by the photo.

The next day, I meet with Deputy Prime Minister Boris Chochiev. When
I tell him about my experiences with the police, he looks concerned
and says he will investigate. Then he adds: "You know, people don’t
trust foreign journalists. The international journalists who travel
from Georgia are usually following someone’s orders." Whose orders?

"The orders of those who support Georgia. They don’t want true
information; they want to represent us as just a small bunch of
separatists that don’t want to live with Georgia. But why don’t we
want to live with Georgia? This is what they don’t want to write."

Chochiev, a jovial man with a bushy mustache, is also a historian,
and he gives me two books that he wrote on this very subject:
South Ossetia: A Chronicle of the Events of the Georgian Aggression
1988-1992 and Memories of a Nation: Victims of Georgia’s Aggressive
Policy Against South Ossetia.

Ossetians say they have nothing in common with Georgia and that
South Ossetia is an artificial creation thrown together by ethnic
Georgian Bolsheviks who wanted to separate and weaken the Ossetian
nation. (A much larger portion of the Ossetian people lives in North
Ossetia, a part of Russia just across the Caucasus mountains from
South Ossetia.) They say that throughout the Soviet era, Georgia
populated South Ossetia with ethnic Georgians and restricted the use
of the Ossetian language.

South Ossetia now appears to be a police state. Close to half the men I
see on the street are police or military, and many men not in uniform
openly wear pistols. Many of the police are engaged in make-work
duties, it appears (including monitoring foreign journalists). There is
a large detachment on the top floor of my hotel, allegedly providing
security for the hotel (although I seem to be the only guest), and
when some rowdy teenagers disrupt a concert celebrating Victory Day,
the anniversary of the Soviet victory over Germany in World War II,
a dozen or so police, including OMON forces (comparable to a SWAT team)
are there to intercede.

There are very few shops and little activity on the streets, even
for a town of 40,000–but especially for the capital of a would-be
independent republic. The biggest industry besides the security
apparatus, which is almost all funded from Moscow, is subsistence
farming.

People here blame the United States for providing military support
to Georgia and emboldening Tbilisi to act against South Ossetia, and
there is no ambivalence about the relationship with Moscow. Russia
and Ossetia have been military allies since at least the 19th
century. Moscow has traditionally relied on its fellow Christian
Ossetians against the many Muslim nations in the Caucasus as well as
against the independent-minded Georgians.

In 2001, the speaker of the South Ossetian parliament wrote a letter
to Russian President Vladimir Putin asking him to annex the country.

Foreign Minister Murat Djioev tells me that joining Russia is also
his desire, but independence is the first step on that path. For now,
though, Russia seems satisfied to exercise de facto control over South
Ossetia. It has given Russian passports to South Ossetians–who can’t
travel on their South Ossetian passports–and now 96 percent of South
Ossetians are Russian citizens. I ask Djioev about the Russian flags
and Putin billboards around town. "I want us to be part of Russia,
but I understand this won’t happen quickly. As Russian citizens, we
want to demonstrate that the Russian flag is our flag and Putin is our
president," he says. Several top officials, including the minister of
defense and the head of the security service, are Russians. Djioev
makes no apologies for it. "When it’s necessary to invite a Russian
specialist here, we’ll do it. In San Marino, many of the top officials
are Italians, and nobody criticizes them for it," he says. (Russia
will, in 2008, move to formalize ties with South Ossetia as well as
Abkhazia, further ratcheting up tensions with Georgia.)

One night at the Café Farn, where I had gotten to know many of the
regulars, a burly, jolly, and extremely drunken man comes over. "He’s
spetsnaz"–a special-forces soldier–one of my friends at the table
tells me. "Russian or South Ossetian spetsnaz?" I ask.

"Russian," he says, to the visible discomfort of the other people at
the table. "Well, Russian and South Ossetian," he says. "But never
mind," he adds and pours a round of vodka shots.

South Ossetia’s position has lately become more precarious. Dmitri
Sanakoev, a former South Ossetian defense minister and veteran of
the 1990-92 war, changed sides, and in 2006 he was elected president
of South Ossetia in an "alternative" poll organized by a few ethnic
Georgian villages in South Ossetia. He now runs a separatist state
within this separatist state, advocating reintegration with Georgia
from a village just on the outskirts of Tskhinvali. It is widely
assumed in South Ossetia that Sanakoev changed sides only because the
Georgian government offered to pay off his considerable gambling debts.

The Georgian government initially held Sanakoev at arm’s length,
but it is now cooperating with him in increasingly high-profile ways.

During my visit, several members of the Georgian parliament went to
Kurta, his capital, for a meeting and photo-op with the government
there.

A crew from South Ossetian state television covered the event, and they
invited along me and Zarina, a 21-year-old assistant press officer
for the South Ossetian government. Zarina has already given me the
South Ossetian nationalist party line: Georgians hate Ossetians and
denied everything to Ossetians under communism. They killed Ossetian
children in the war. The hypercarbonated Ossetian mineral water is
far better than the famed Georgian Borjomi. Oh, and the Internet is
bad in South Ossetia because Georgians interfere with it.

The Kurta government turns on the charm for the visitors from
Tskhinvali. While we wait for the parliamentarians to arrive, a series
of government staffers comes over to the Tskhinvali visitors to make
friendly small talk and offer us coffee. One sixtysomething woman,
wearing an evening dress with a plunging neckline, comes over to
us. Soon she is crying theatrically: "Why can’t we live together?

Why do we have to be divided," she says, sobbing.

The Kurta prime minister introduces himself, flashing a big smile
of gold teeth. "Welcome to Kurta, please come anytime!" he says and
gives each of us his business card, which features the same symbol
the Tskhinvali government uses, but in the Georgian language as well
as Ossetian and Russian.

Zarina is unimpressed with the prime minister and the rest of the
Kurta hospitality. "If someone is smiling at you, and inside you know
he hates you, what can you think?" she asks after he leaves. "He is
the prime minister of four villages," she adds with as much disdain as
she can muster. She seems unaware of the irony of these words coming
from a representative of a government that rules over 60,000 people
but has a president and a foreign ministry.

We notice that the podium flies a South Ossetian flag next to a
Georgian flag. Zarina, again, is appalled. "Our people cannot tolerate
that the Georgian flag and the South Ossetian flag are together after
this genocide, after they killed little children," she says.

It is tempting to dismiss this as hysteria from a government
apparatchik, but the emotion Ossetians feel about the war is real.

After my interview with Chochiev, I went to get lunch at the Café
Farn. When my new friends saw Memories of a Nation, they somberly
paged through, looking for photos of friends and family who had
been killed. After all, 1,000 people in such a small community is
a lot, and the war touched everyone here. Zarina tells me that as a
5-year-old, she lived in nearby Gori, where her father was stationed
as a Soviet army officer. She remembers Georgian soldiers breaking
into the barracks and forcing the family out because they were ethnic
Ossetians. They fled to Tskhinvali. "I didn’t understand anything,
but I was so scared," she says.

Eventually, the parliamentarians arrive, meet, and have a short press
conference. Then the charm offensive resumes, and the Kurta government
press officers invite the Tskhinvali visitors to the cafeteria for
lunch. The Tskhinvalians are mortified at the prospect of breaking
bread with the enemy, torn between two Caucasian imperatives:
hospitality and their nation. The Kurta officials literally have to
drag them by the crooks of their elbows into the cafeteria, and the
Tskhinvalians give in. A bottle of homemade wine is produced. "Let’s
toast! No politics, just to us, all of us," one of the Kurtans
proposes.

We eat as quickly as we can, make awkward conversation, and say our
goodbyes. I ask Zarina what she thinks of it all. "They are monsters,"
she says.

___________________________________________ _________________________________

From: Joshua Kucera Subject: The Cult of Heydar Aliyev Posted Tuesday,
May 20, 2008, at 1:27 PM ET

______________________________________________ ______________________________

GANJA, Azerbaijan–In the State History Museum of Ganja, Azerbaijan’s
second city, there is a painting called "A Great Voice Rises From
Moscow." It shows an ethereal being plunging a fiery sword into
a chaotic city full of rioters. Clearly, there is a message here,
but for the life of me, I can’t figure out what it is.

"This is in 1990, when Russians and Armenians were attacking our people
and we said, ‘Heydar Aliyev, come help us,’ " explains my guide, Ulker,
a second-year university student in history. But I don’t understand
the sword and who is holding it, I say. "This is God saying, ‘Enough,’
" she explains.

That painting is subtle compared with one in the next room that
features a bare-chested Mikhail Gorbachev peering over the turret of
a tank that he is driving across a map of Azerbaijan.

Gorbachev–who is portrayed as hairy as a gorilla–is thrusting a
long spear at Baku, the capital. From outside Azerbaijan’s borders,
sharks and wolves attack from various directions.

"This one is about how everyone attacked us like animals," Ulker
explains.

By most measures, Azerbaijanis shouldn’t have this victimization
complex. Their economy is the fastest-growing in the world, and with
vast, recently discovered reserves of oil and gas off the Caspian
Sea coast, they (unlike most of the neighbors) have largely been able
to run their country without interference from the United States or
Russia, both of which are eager to curry favor with the government
rather than strong-arm it.

But Azerbaijan still smarts from the humiliating loss of nearly 20
percent of its territory, including the former autonomous region of
Nagorno-Karabakh, to its enemies, the Armenians. Aliyev, who died
in 2003 and was succeeded by his son, Ilham, skillfully manipulated
this humiliation to build his personality cult into one of the most
extensive in the world.

Today, Azerbaijan is full of Heydar Aliyev boulevards, parks, statues,
and billboards. Every history museum has at least one room devoted to
Heydar Aliyev, and every major town has a museum devoted exclusively
to him. An American who taught in Azerbaijan tells me that the school
curriculum is similarly Heydar-heavy.

Throughout the museum in Ganja, a simple narrative explains the
country’s recent history: Armenia attacked Azerbaijan without
provocation, Russia schemed behind the scenes to help the Armenians,
and no one in the world was on Azerbaijan’s side. Then Heydar Aliyev
came to lead Azerbaijan into the era of peace and prosperity it
currently enjoys.

"All people love Heydar Aliyev," Ulker says. "Before, we used to be
poor. Now we are rich. He doesn’t think about his family; he only
thinks about the Azerbaijani people," she says.

Ulker asks whether I’d been to Armenia and whether I liked Armenian
people. "Of course. They’re good people, like everywhere," I say. She
is shocked: "No! They killed our people." I say that Azeris killed
Armenians, too. "No, they didn’t," she insists.

I expected the anti-Armenian propaganda. But what surprises me is
how many anti-Russian elements the narrative contains. The standard
villain is "the Armenians and Russians," always paired together. In
the room on World War II, Ulker explains how Azerbaijan sent people
to fight fascism and Moscow took 80 percent of Azerbaijan’s oil.

"Before, the Russians took all our oil and gave it to other countries,
and we were poor. Now we’re independent, and we can sell the oil
ourselves," she says.

Over-the-top propaganda notwithstanding, most Azerbaijanis do seem
to like Heydar Aliyev. Even his critics admit that he was shrewd and
highly intelligent and that his strong hand was what Azerbaijan needed
in the chaos of the early 1990s, during which he succeeded two feckless
post-Soviet presidents at a time when many observers doubted Azerbaijan
could survive as an independent country. And most people, while rarely
as devoted as Ulker, don’t admit any reservations about him. They do,
however, seem faintly embarrassed about the abundance of memorials.

"When he was ruling the country, he didn’t let this cult of personality
get too out-of-hand," says Eldar Namazov, a former top aide to Heydar
Aliyev who broke with the president in the late 1990s and now heads
a small opposition political party. "He was smart, and he knew what
he was doing."

"But the people in charge now aren’t as smart. They’re going too far,
and now people are laughing at it," he says. He describes a fountain
in Baku, which, at its grand opening, spouted a wall of water on which
was projected a movie of Heydar Aliyev saying, "The independence of
Azerbaijan will be forever." Namazov laughs at the memory. "I wouldn’t
believe it if I hadn’t seen it with my own eyes," he says.

The current regime has concerns about its legitimacy, and the
celebrations of Heydar Aliyev are a way of shoring up their authority,
one Western diplomat tells me. He says the government is tying the
broad national agenda that Heydar Aliyev established–secularism and
a Western orientation–to the personality of Aliyev, who is regarded
by most Azerbaijanis as the founder of their nation.

"Ataturk is everywhere in Turkey, and he represents secularism and
democracy. Here it’s the same thing: Heydar Aliyev represents a secular
government and an orientation toward the West," the diplomat says.

The proliferation of Aliyev memorials across the country is not
ordered from the top, both the diplomat and Namazov say; overzealous
local officials are to blame.

"Power is pretty much concentrated at the top here, and local officials
understand that to curry favor with the central government they can
put up these statues and parks," the diplomat says.

Namazov tells me the narrative that I saw in the Ganja museum is one
that Heydar Aliyev himself established. "He had a standard story that
he told a million times whenever he met international officials or
journalists. If the person was new in the region, he told the long
version, which took maybe an hour. If the person knew what he was
doing, he got the short version, which was 15 or 20 minutes."

"There were several key episodes in the story," he says. Heydar Aliyev
was invited to go to Moscow to be part of the Soviet government, but
he didn’t want to go. If he hadn’t been from a Muslim republic, he
would have been premier of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev schemed against
him. He left the Communist Party as a protest against Soviet policy
on Nagorno-Karabakh. He then went back to Nakhcivan, his hometown,
to be a private citizen. After the first two disastrous governments of
independent Azerbaijan, "the people" demanded that he come to Baku and
lead them. As president, there were two assassination attempts and,
again, "the people" saved him.

"He also told this story around Azerbaijan, and this is the same
story you see today–maybe with some embellishments," he says.

"Like the sharks."

–Boundary_(ID_CeQgxEuq79/ArGT0HdiI tw)–

http://www.slate.com/id/219

Vartan Gregorian commencement address – Clark University 5.18.08

PRESS RELEASE
Clark University
University Communications
Jane Salerno
Senior Associate Director, Media Relations
950 Main Street, Worcester, MA 01610-1477
Tel: 508-793-7635
email: [email protected]
web:

Below is text from the Sunday, May 18, Clark University Commencement
address, by Vartan Gregorian, President of the Carnegie Corporation of
New York.

Gregorian is a historian, educator and author. As president of
Carnegie Corporation, a grant-making institution founded by Andrew
Carnegie in 1911, he has worked for the past 10 years to promote
Carnegie’s vision of philanthropy by building on his two major
concerns: advancing education and international peace.

Born in Iran of Armenian parents, Gregorian was educated in Iran and
Lebanon before entering Stanford University where he earned his
B.A. in 1958 and Ph.D. in 1964. After teaching history at several
American universities, he joined the University of Pennsylvania, where
he was appointed founding dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences
(1974), becoming that institution’s 23rd provost four years later. He
went on to become the president of The New York Public Library (1981-
89), where he raised over $300 million, and president of Brown
University (1989-97), where he nearly tripled the University’s
endowment.

Among Gregorian’s numerous awards and fellowships are the Ellis Island
Medal of Honor (1986), the American Academy of the Institute of Arts
and Letters’ Gold Medal of Service to the Arts (1989), the National
Humanities Medal (1998), awarded to him by President Bill Clinton and
the Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian award (2004). He
serves on the boards of many institutions, including Brandeis
University, Central European University, The Museum of Modern Art and
Human Rights Watch and has been a board member of the J. Paul Getty
Trust and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. He has been decorated
by governments around the world.

Gregorian is the author of "The Road To Home: My Life And Times,"
"Islam: A Mosaic, Not a Monolith," and "The Emergence of Modern
Afghanistan, 1880-1946."

The speech, photos and more about Clark’s event can be found online:

Cla rk University Commencement Address
Vartan Gregorian
Sunday, May 18, 2008

President John Bassett, Chairman William Mosakowski, Trustees of Clark
University, Provost David Angel, deans, distinguished faculty,
dedicated staff, proud parents, wonderful students, Senior Class
Speaker Emily Zoback, grateful benefactors who have invested so much
and so wisely in Clark University, fellow honorees-Christopher
Collier, Arthur Remillard, Diana Chapman Walsh-and ladies and
gentlemen. . .

I want to pay tribute to Clark University for not abandoning
Worcester, for not walking away from Worcester; for not giving up on
K-12 education but providing models for its renewal; for not giving up
on local communities but rather forming productive partnerships such
as Clark Park; for Clark’s conviction that democracy and excellence
are not mutually exclusive.

Commencements are special, symbolic, solemn, and joyous occasions
marking the end of one phase of life and the beginning of another. As
I look out today, I am delighted that there are so many people to
celebrate this wonderful day with you. In 1958 when I graduated from
Stanford University, I had no family in this country, and indeed I had
no one to attend my graduation ceremony. So I did not march. In 1964
when Ph.D. degrees were awarded, I was teaching. I had once again no
opportunity to attend that ceremony either. So today it is with envy,
great enthusiasm, and admiration that I am participating in your
commencement, and, for the first time, my sister and brother-in-law
from Iran and my nephew from Boston are attending my graduation.

Rest at ease. I am not a politician in search of votes or in need of
yet another platform to "clarify," once again, my previous positions
on a variety of issues. Thank God I am not one of those who is famous
for being famous. I am here as an academic, to witness this solemn
day of your commencement, your new beginning that marks the sacrifice
of your parents, dedication of your professors and, most importantly,
your own sustained hard work, faith, determination, and
accomplishments.

Commencement speeches mark a rite of passage. While I am honored to
be part of your celebration and the class of 2008, I have no illusion
about my role. After all, hardly anyone remembers their commencement
speech, or even who gave it, unless it was a celebrity like Jennifer
Anniston, Quentin Tarantino, Bruce Willis, Orlando Bloom, Oprah
Winfrey, or even the President of the United States. . .

I checked to see what have been the most memorable commencement
speeches ever given so that I would not be off the mark. Looking back
half a century, I was astonished to find that, according to The
Washington Post, there were three unforgettable commencement
addresses: one was given in 1947 by U.S. Secretary of State George
Marshall, who announced the legendary U.S. plan to rebuild Europe
after World War II. Another was given in 1963 by President John
F. Kennedy, who announced a moratorium on nuclear weapons tests. The
third one, however, which had no news value at all, was given in 1997.

It featured my late friend Kurt Vonnegut. It began with a famous
line: "Ladies and gentlemen of the class of ’97. Wear sunscreen."
Other bits of advice included injunctions to "floss," "sing,"
"stretch" and "don’t mess too much with your hair." My favorite line
was: "Remember compliments you receive. Forget the insults. If you
succeed in doing this, tell me how." Thank God the so-called
"Vonnegut Speech," which set a new tone for commencement speeches,
turned out to be an internet hoax. . .

I have also come here today to pay tribute to American higher
education and one of its exemplary institutions, Clark University, to
Clark’s amazing legacy, its outstanding faculty, its remarkable
leaders. I am here to pay homage to you, students, to your growth as
educated, cultured citizens, to your metamorphosis into the kind of
people-human beings-who have developed the ability at least to try to
comprehend the incomprehensible; to make sense out of confusion;
wrestle some logic out of the illogical; and challenge even ugliness
to show some glimmer of beauty somewhere deep within its core. You
have spent the last four, five or six years at Clark University in
order to learn how to analyze, synthesize and systematize information
and knowledge; to separate the chaff from the wheat; subjectivity from
objectivity; fact from opinion; public interests from private
interests; manipulations from influence; and "spin" from corruption.

I hope you have learned to be flexible in your thinking, adaptable in
your analysis of issues, and appreciative of the complexities that
comprise almost every aspect of daily life-both on the human and
global scale. I’m sure you don’t yet realize just what an
extraordinary skill you have developed, how well it will serve you in
the future, and how desperately the world needs people who are not
paralyzed by complexity but welcome the opportunity it brings to think
new thoughts, develop new ideas, and find new ways to solve problems.
I am sure you are, and always will be, mindful of the great American
humorist H. L. Mencken’s warning that: "there is always an easy
solution to every human problem: neat, plausible…and wrong!"

I am sure your Clark University education has prepared you to begin to
understand the relationship of the unique and individual self to the
social, political, and cultural world around you. I hope it has also
given you the courage to think those big, imponderable thoughts that
are our companions throughout our lives, such as: what is our
relationship to universal order? What is our place as a human being
amongst the great sea of mankind? Though you may never answer these
and other questions for yourselves, and perhaps they will always be
unanswerable, they will help you create a framework for the way you
live your lives.

In this difficult time when many of us worry about our country and its
direction, about its values, its promise and its future, I’m still
convinced that while America is not perfect, it is still
perfectible. It is still a land of opportunity for immigrants and for
international students, not only Americans alone. … Many of you in
the audience today are proof of that as well. It’s amazing, isn’t it,
that until recently two-thirds of all students studying abroad have
been attending American colleges and universities?

But with the opportunity we have all had to study at America’s great
institutions of higher learning, comes responsibility, as well. What
we have learned in school we must find ways to put into action. We
cannot retreat from the big issues of society and the world and our
time into the pygmy world of private piety. Nor can we become cynics
paralyzed by our own disdain, and we must not become-we cannot afford
to become-social, political and moral isolationists.

That is especially true for those of us who are foreign or current
international students. Whether we remain here or to return to our
native countries, we have the obligation to build bridges between our
nations, our societies and the United States, and vice versa,
especially now. And those who come from developing countries have yet
another obligation, and a very weighty one, to work toward creating a
better quality of life for those at home and to advance the
opportunities that are available to them. After all, you represent
their hopes for a better future.

For those of us who were born elsewhere but were educated here and
then became American citizens, we have reason to be doubly
grateful. One, because we received our education in America, not to
mention financial support. And two, because America granted us the
privilege of citizenship in a country whose Constitution proclaims
that "we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain
unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit
of happiness."

These are lofty aspirations. Remember, however, that America has
always been and will always be a work in progress. Every generation
has and must contribute to that ongoing progress. As John Gardner once
said, it is important to be both a loving critic and a critical
lover. America needs all of us to be both.

And now let me come back to you! Clark marks the beginning of your
latest wonderful, arduous journey. It has provided you with the means
to be on your way. It has given you not only an education, a
profession and all the skills and confidences you need to do well in
the world, but it has also given you choices and the ability to
choose. Sometimes you may find you have so many choices that all the
possibilities available to you will be overwhelming. This morning I’d
like to share with you three lessons I have learned that may-I stress
may-assist you in making your choices.

The first lesson, actually, is a well-known one. I believe, if I’m not
mistaken, it was Sir William Osler, professor of medicine at Oxford
University in the early years of the 20th century, who said that young
men-and women-should be careful in the selection of their ambitions
because they’re likely to realize them. Since you have the education,
the knowledge and the training to realize your ambitions, be as sure
as you can that your ambition also reflects what you really love to
do.

Speaking of your ambition, sometimes you may be masters of it, but
watch out. Sometimes you may be its slave, and watch out. Other times
you may be a victim of hubris. No matter what, try to bear in mind the
next lesson: don’t confuse a job with a career. In the past I used to
say to students that in your life, you will have many jobs but only
one career. Now, however, if we keep on the way we are going in terms
of how long we can expect to live, many of you will be octogenarians,
some of you may even be centenarians, so you may have not only many
jobs, but also many careers as well. I haven’t quite reached either
age category as yet, but I have worked in a number of fields, as it
was mentioned-academia, libraries and now philanthropy-and I can share
with you the fact that people often ask me, "Which job did you like
best?" But they’re asking me the wrong question. I’ve never considered
any of the positions I’ve held as jobs. In fact, I even think of them
as more than careers. To me, they have been missions in which teaching
and learning are primary ingredients, with me as the primary student.

So even though this is probably the last thing you want to hear today,
I want to remind you that whether you like it or not, in order to
survive and thrive, you will have to be lifelong students and lifetime
learners. And yes, there are and always will be difficult times when
you will think you have come to a dead end in your life or in your
career, even an apparent point of no return, but let me tell you as
one who has experienced those events once or twice, when that happens,
think of what the author Gabriel Garcia Marquez once said when he
spoke of the condition that human beings are not born once and for all
on the day their mothers gave birth to them, but that life obliges
them to give birth to themselves over and over again. Time,
experience, knowledge, education, love, one’s values, all these can
and do affect us and change us, and enable us to reinvent ourselves. I
have invented myself many times and I’m sure you will do the same
thing.

For me, Marquez’s words have a particular resonance because they
reinforce values that were taught to me by my maternal grandmother, an
illiterate peasant woman. She raised me. My grandmother was an
illiterate peasant, a poor one at that. I don’t believe that she knew
where Greece was, nor Rome, nor the United States. She certainly did
not know who Plutarch was, but even so she taught me the same lesson
as Plutarch highlighted in his celebrated Lives almost 2,000 years
ago, when he said, essentially, that character makes the man and
woman. My grandmother was my first teacher. She instructed me in the
moral lessons of life and the "right way," through her sheer
character, stoic tenacity, formidable dignity, individuality and utter
integrity. She was for me the best example of what good character
means. In spite of many adversities and tragedies, wartime ravages,
poverty, deprivation and the deaths of her seven children, she never
became cynical, never abandoned her values and never compromised her
dignity. Indeed, it was from my grandmother that I learned that
dignity is not negotiable. Your reputation is not for sale and must
not be mortgaged as a down payment on your ambitions. It was my
grandmother’s living example that shaped the very foundation of my
character. Between what I have learned from Plutarch and my
grandmother-a combination of forces I would dare anybody to
challenge!-I feel confident in telling you that in the coming years
you will meet people who are more powerful than you, richer than you,
smarter than you, even handsomer or more beautiful than you, but what
will be your distinguishing mark will always be your character. And
what will define your character? Your conduct, your ability to live by
principles you believe in, even if that means fighting tenaciously for
what is right over what you know to be wrong.

Nobody goes through life without encountering obstacles,
disappointments, and problems. Nobody can keep from making mistakes or
taking a wrong turn. Nobody can escape illness or avoid the specter of
failure. Let me point out that coping with success is easy. How you
deal with adversity, with failure, and with setbacks will reveal your
true character. How nimble you are about getting back on your feet
after some large or small disaster or defeat will help you to
determine just how far those feet of yours will take you in the world.

But that’s where your upbringing, the texture of your education and
your values will help you to develop a distinctive attitude toward
life, an attitude that persistently seeks meaning and perspective, an
attitude that exudes adaptability and resilience in a relentlessly
changing and perplexing world, an attitude of moral courage and
steadfastness in the face of overwhelming human need and
suffering. How to develop and maintain such attitudes in an age where
"individualism" has become a cult and celebrities, icons-where people
are famous for being famous-is not an easy task. We must be reminded
time and time again that we are not mere
consumer/entertainment/socio-economic/socio-b iological and information
units, to be processed. We are not numbers. We are unique, rational,
spiritual and social beings full of competing sentiments, insatiable
yearnings, dreams, imagination, quests and ties that bind us to the
past and the future.

It might be helpful to remind ourselves that it was Alexis de
Tocqueville who in the 1830s coined the word "individualism," to
describe the self-reliant character of Americans. But he also went on
to extol Americans’ generosity, their proclivity to create voluntary
citizens associations and the fact that volunteers and altruists have
played a critical role in preserving and strengthening what he called
the modern world’s first nation that did not have a ruling class. In
that way, he made clear that both the private and public realm,
private good and public good, are interdependent. One without the
other will diminish the bonds of community and creativity. Some 125
years later, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. put it more succinctly: "We
may have all come in different ships but we are in the same boat now."

Today we must be reminded that what is unique about each of us should
be celebrated and cherished, that we must not forget that we also
belong to a larger community, society and, indeed, humanity. As
Americans and as human beings we have an obligation to contribute to
the well-being of our communities; hence, to the public good.

I hope as you climb the ladder of success, you will always remember
the dictum "From those to whom much has been given, much is expected."

In conclusion, I would like to offer you just one last thought about
our shared human condition. Today information floods over us, and a
millisecond later in comes another flood of data and information, and
then another and another. Images of pleasure and pain, fear and joy,
love and hate assault us from all the angles. The world around us is
full of raucous chatter and noise. Amid all this cacophony, it’s hard
to see ourselves as part of a larger whole, a continuing eternal
harmony, that music of the spheres that the ancients thought we would
hear only in our inner ear. Well, today I would like to remind you of
your connection to history. Try to listen with your inner ears to
those who went before you, parents, grandparents, great-grandparents
and on and on, who all wanted to be good ancestors to you.

As an historian, educator and a fellow student, I feel bound to remind
you that the time has come for you to return the favor. You have to
learn to be good ancestors to the future.

Today’s commencement marks the beginning of many other beginnings for
you, many other commencements in your life. Many mornings, many
beginnings are before you. The future is waiting for you with open
arms. I wish you good luck, great success and great humanity. Thank
you very much.

http://www.clarku.edu/commencement/
www.clarku.edu

Adam Schiff Urges U.S. Leadership To Call Upon Turkey To Lift Its Bl

ADAM SCHIFF URGES U.S. LEADERSHIP TO CALL UPON TURKEY TO LIFT ITS BLOCKADE OF ARMENIA

Noyan Tapan

Ma y 19, 2008

WASHINGTON, MAY 20, ARMENIANS TODAY – NOYAN TAPAN. Congressman Adam
Schiff has introduced a bill urging the President and Secretary of
State to call upon Turkey to immediately lift its ongoing blockade
of Armenia. The "End the Turkish Blockade of Armenia Act" requires a
report from the Secretary of State within 30 days of final passage
that will outline steps taken by the U.S. to end Turkey’s blockade
of Armenia.

"We need to step up pressure on Turkey to lift the draconian blockade
of Armenia, permitting Armenian businesses to fully participate in
the global economy and assisting Armenia’s integration into Europe,"
said Adam Schiff.

Rep. Schiff is a member of the Congressional Caucus on Armenian
Issues and the co-founder of the Democratic Study Group on National
Security. He serves on the House Appropriations Committee, the House
Judiciary Committee, and the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=113548

Qatari Emir Steps Up As Talks Make Halting Progress

QATARI EMIR STEPS UP AS TALKS MAKE HALTING PROGRESS
By Hussein Abdallah

The Daily Star
May 19 2008
Lebanon

BEIRUT: Qatari Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani weighed in on
the third day of talks his country his hosting among opposition and
pro-government leaders from Lebanon, meeting separately and jointly
with members of both camps to try to bridge differences, mainly on
the issue of drafting a new electoral law for the 2009 parliamentary
elections.

Well-informed sources in Doha told The Daily Star on Sunday that
Sheikh Hamad has intervened and held talks with the rival leaders in
a bid to address every hurdle in the talks.

The sources said that Qatari officials are satisfied with the rival
leaders’ positive attitude toward the process. As The Daily Star went
to press, there were indications that an interim declaration might
be issued.

The sources added that the two days of talks have thus far focused
on an electoral law, adding that the shape of the new government has
yet to be discussed in detail.

Despite reports that talks may yet stumble over a demand from the
ruling coalition for clear guarantees that Hizbullah would not turn
its guns on them again and that the fate of its arms would be debated
in Lebanon soon, the sources said that the issue of Hizbullah’s arms
has not been put on the negotiations table in Doha yet.

Arab mediators clinched a deal on Thursday to end Lebanon’s worst
internal fighting since the 1975-1990 civil war, in which fighters
from Hizbullah and its allies, the Amal Movement and the Syrian Social
Nationalist Party, routed pro-government gunmen and briefly seized
parts of Beirut.

The fate of Hizbullah’s weapons is not on the agenda, but delegates
said Arab mediators were consulting on the issue with regional
powerbrokers including Iran, which supports the opposition, and Saudi
Arabia, which a leading supporter of the ruling coalition.

"This issue is not under discussion and is not up for discussion on
the table of dialogue in Doha," Hizbullah MP Hussein Hajj Hassan
said. "They are trying to raise this issue for their own private
calculations which are mistaken anyway."

Hizbullah’s chief negotiator, Mohammed Raad, on Sunday accused the
government of trying to "blackmail" the opposition by raising the
subject of Hizbullah’s weapons.

Youth and Sports Minister Ahmad Fatfat said that there would be no
agreement unless the arms issue is addressed.

"The agreement we reached in Beirut includes discussing this issue
and the last clause of the six-point agreement says that all the
points are equally binding," he said.

But Amal Movement MP Ali Hassan Khalil denied that the six-point
agreement reached in Beirut had any mention of Hizbullah’s possession
of arms.

"The agreement speaks about enhancing the authority of the Lebanese
state, and specifies that this issue is not on the agenda of talks
and is to be dealt with later on after electing a new president,"
Khalil said.

Notwithstanding the sensitive issue of Hizbullah’s weapons, the talks
appeared to make headway on Sunday.

A six-member committee created on Saturday to lay the framework for
a new election law has made progress and was now working out the
details of how to divide Beirut.

Tashnak Party MP Hagop Pakradounian told LBC television that there
were major dif-ferences on how to divide Beirut, particularly regarding
the Christian constituency.

Reports from Doha said that the ruling majority has proposed dividing
Beirut into three constituencies – two Sunni-dominated and one
Christian – with the Christian constituency getting to elect only
four of Beirut’s 10 Christian MPs.

The capital’s Christian seats are currently distributed as follows;
four seats for Armenians, two for minority Christians, two for Greek
Orthodox Christians, one for Catholics, and one for Maronites.

Such a proposal was strongly opposed by the opposition amid reports
that the Armenian Tashnak Party, allied with the opposition, protested
leaving the four Armenian seats out of the Christian constituency.

Pakradounian also indicated that some parties from the parliamentary
majority were also against the proposal.

But former President Amin Gemayel sounded more optimistic when speaking
on the electoral law.

"I think we have resolved 90 percent of the hurdles facing the new
election law … We have some obstacles left regarding some electoral
constituencies," Gemayel said.

"Hopefully, by evening we will have published a joint vision. We have
to reach a solution in the end," he added.

Earlier on Sunday, Hajj Hassan accused the parliamentary majority of
doing the math before proposing its formula of a new electoral law.

"They want to know the results of the elections in advance," he
told LBC.

Meanwhile, Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassem bin Jabr
al-Thani had yet to win final approval on the shape of a new government
but had made several proposals, including one to split seats three
ways equally among rivals, delegates said.

Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa told Radio Free Lebanon
on Sunday that he expected "today to be a decisive day" at the Qatar
talks that seek to end the 18-month political stalemate and facilitate
the election of a president after a six-month vacuum.

Moussa also said that he would visit Damascus after the Doha conference
concludes its discussions of the crisis.

The Hizbullah-led opposition wants more say in a cabinet controlled
by the anti-Syrian March 14 Forces.

The ruling coalition’s refusal to yield to the demand for an effective
veto power in the cabinet triggered the resignation of six ministers –
including all five Shiites – in November 2006, crippling a political
system built around a delicate sectarian balance.

Election laws have always been a sensitive subject in Lebanon,
a patchwork of religious sects where redrawing constituencies can
have a dramatic impact on voting results.

A deal would lead to the election of commander of Lebanese Armed
Forces General Michel Suleiman as president.

Both sides have accepted his nomination for a post reserved for a
Maronite Christian in Lebanon’s sectarian power-sharing system. –
With agencies

Bush reiterates call for other countries to side against Hizbullah

SHARM EL-SHEIKH: US President George W. Bush called on Sunday on
Lebanon’s neighbours and other nations in the Middle East to oppose
Hizbullah.

"We must stand with the people of Lebanon in their struggle to
build a sovereign and independent democracy. This means opposing
Hizbullah terrorists, funded by Iran, who recently revealed their
true intentions by taking up arms against the Lebanese people,"
Bush told a forum in Egypt.

He was speaking as rival Lebanese leaders were meeting in Qatar in a
bid to resolve a protracted political crisis that recently threatened
to escalate into all-out civil war.

At least 65 people were killed in six days of street battles between
pro- and anti-government forces that saw opposition gunmen led by
Hizbullah briefly seize control of large swathes of western Beirut.

"Hizbullah militias are the enemy of a free Lebanon and all nations,
especially neighbors in the region, have an interest in helping the
Lebanese people prevail," Bush added.

Groundbreaking Ceremony Of Holy Cross Armenian Church In Laval

GROUNDBREAKING CEREMONY OF HOLY CROSS ARMENIAN CHURCH IN LAVAL

armradio.am
19.05.2008 13:43

The Diocese of the Armenian Church of Canada announces the commencement
of the building of the Laval Armenian Community Center and Holy
Cross Church on 5001 Blvd. de Souvenir. Extensive planning and
consultations during the past two years have finally brought the
Diocese, the steering committee and the Laval Armenian community
closer to realizing this long awaited dream.

Under the auspices of His Eminence Bishop Bagrat Galstanian, Primate
the Steering Committee is organizing the Groundbreaking Ceremony,
to be held on May 31.

Through the establishment of the Holy Cross Armenian Apostolic Church
and the Community Center, the Diocese and the faithful of the community
together are working to provide a home for the future generations. As
the project to build an Armenian Church and Community Center evolves,
the total sum of donations, to date has surpassed the target set by
the Steering Committee.

Presently the Building Fund for the Holy Cross Armenian Church of
Laval has reached $2.3 million. The total project is expected to be
completed at a current estimated cost of $6.5 million.

The steady growth of the Armenian community of Laval necessitated
an action plan to evaluate its future alternatives. Following the
recommendations of that study, the Parish Council started negotiations
with the Commission Scolaire des Ã~Icoles Catholique de Laval for
the purchase of a property on Blvd. des Souvenirs in Laval. After
lengthy negotiations, the land purchase process was realized.

On Saturday, May 31 2008 the most anticipated construction plans
will begin.

The property holds the full potential of housing a church and a
Community Center for the Laval community. While the Church will serve
the spiritual needs of the community, the Community Center will play
an essential role in the mission to serve the Laval residents by
helping them evolve both, culturally and educationally.

–Boundary_(ID_93bjPfvRYzNBfFXdNB5 zfA)–